| openstackgerrit | Matt McEuen proposed openstack/airship-divingbell master: Make README.rst https://review.openstack.org/629074 | 00:10 |
|---|---|---|
| *** georgk has quit IRC | 00:26 | |
| *** aaronsheffield has quit IRC | 00:51 | |
| openstackgerrit | Kaspars Skels proposed openstack/airship-treasuremap master: Revert "Make keystone default host to be consistent with port" https://review.openstack.org/629075 | 00:51 |
| *** roman_g has quit IRC | 01:18 | |
| *** shoaibwr has quit IRC | 02:49 | |
| *** shoaibwr has joined #airshipit | 02:49 | |
| *** portdirect has joined #airshipit | 03:57 | |
| openstackgerrit | Kaspars Skels proposed openstack/airship-treasuremap master: Revert "Make keystone default host to be consistent with port" https://review.openstack.org/629075 | 04:26 |
| *** dims has quit IRC | 04:47 | |
| *** evrardjp_ has joined #airshipit | 08:48 | |
| *** evrardjp__ has joined #airshipit | 08:49 | |
| *** evrardjp has quit IRC | 08:51 | |
| *** evrardjp_ has quit IRC | 08:52 | |
| *** evrardjp__ has quit IRC | 08:53 | |
| *** evrardjp has joined #airshipit | 09:03 | |
| *** roman_g has joined #airshipit | 11:17 | |
| openstackgerrit | Pradeep Kumar proposed openstack/airship-promenade master: This commit is to create logging section in promenade.conf and overriding log_level value in it using values.yaml. https://review.openstack.org/629154 | 11:36 |
| *** dims has joined #airshipit | 13:23 | |
| *** jhesketh has quit IRC | 13:45 | |
| *** jhesketh has joined #airshipit | 13:47 | |
| *** aaronsheffield has joined #airshipit | 13:58 | |
| evrardjp | o/ | 13:58 |
| mattmceuen | Hey jayahn, that's awesome! We'll definitely help get you up and running with deckhand :) | 13:59 |
| mattmceuen | o evrardjp | 13:59 |
| mattmceuen | o/ rather | 13:59 |
| mattmceuen | #startmeeting airship | 14:00 |
| openstack | Meeting started Tue Jan 8 14:00:39 2019 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is mattmceuen. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 14:00 |
| openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 14:00 |
| *** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: airship)" | 14:00 | |
| openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'airship' | 14:00 |
| mattmceuen | #topic rollcall | 14:00 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "rollcall (Meeting topic: airship)" | 14:00 | |
| mattmceuen | good morning / evening / middle of night everyone! | 14:00 |
| evgenyl | o/ | 14:01 |
| hogepodge | Hi! | 14:01 |
| mark-burnett | o/ | 14:01 |
| b-str | o/ | 14:01 |
| aaronsheffield | o/ | 14:01 |
| mattmceuen | Agenda for today: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/airship-meeting-2019-01-08 | 14:01 |
| *** nishant_ has joined #airshipit | 14:01 | |
| dwalt | o/ | 14:01 |
| mattmceuen | Please add in anything additional you'd like to discuss today | 14:01 |
| *** sgrasley has joined #airshipit | 14:02 | |
| *** sthussey has joined #airshipit | 14:02 | |
| mattmceuen | Alrighty | 14:03 |
| mattmceuen | #topic Accessing tiller from behind a proxy | 14:04 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Accessing tiller from behind a proxy (Meeting topic: airship)" | 14:04 | |
| *** georgk has joined #airshipit | 14:04 | |
| mattmceuen | There was a discussion on the ML around accessing tiller from behind the proxy | 14:04 |
| evgenyl | Yes, there is a problem with configuring Armada behind the proxy, no_proxy in grpc (tiller client) does not support cidr for no_proxy, as a result it cannot connect to Tiller. | 14:04 |
| mattmceuen | It led to some good thoughts around how to streamline armada-tiller-shipyard communication in general | 14:04 |
| mattmceuen | but first I was hoping evgenyl could walk through his use case to ground us | 14:05 |
| evgenyl | Scott suggested to configure "proxy" parameter for every repo, I'm wondering if it can be done globally. | 14:05 |
| evgenyl | If we configure tiller with DNS name and use it instead of IP, this should help with no_proxy. | 14:06 |
| mattmceuen | is the proxy issue you're getting happening when you pull images from the repo, or after you pull images and armada is trying to talk to tiller? | 14:06 |
| sthussey | tiller does have a dns name | 14:06 |
| mattmceuen | trying to understand how the repo part fits into this | 14:06 |
| sthussey | there is a tiller service that gets a in-cluster DNS entry | 14:07 |
| sthussey | Ignore me | 14:07 |
| mattmceuen | lol | 14:07 |
| sthussey | That was the previous tiller chart in OSH | 14:07 |
| mattmceuen | ahh | 14:08 |
| evgenyl | mattmceuen: it happens when Armada starts to pull git repos. | 14:08 |
| mattmceuen | I see - that's before armada is actually talking to tiller | 14:08 |
| sthussey | This is why we define proxies per repo | 14:08 |
| sthussey | Because it gives the granularity needed | 14:08 |
| mattmceuen | evgenyl can you give sthussey's idea a try and let us know if it helps, and/or follow on issues? | 14:09 |
| sthussey | I think the issue Evgeny was having isn't functional, it is UX | 14:09 |
| evgenyl | Yes. | 14:10 |
| evgenyl | I was wondering if it can be redefined globally. | 14:10 |
| sthussey | Because in the case of AIAB behind the proxy, he needed to update the proxy for every chart in versions.yaml | 14:10 |
| evgenyl | Does anybody know why DNS was removed from OSH chart? | 14:10 |
| sthussey | We had two charts | 14:10 |
| sthussey | We stopped using OSH | 14:10 |
| sthussey | And use the chart in the Armada repo | 14:11 |
| mattmceuen | #topic Streamlining tiller lookup logic | 14:11 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Streamlining tiller lookup logic (Meeting topic: airship)" | 14:11 | |
| mattmceuen | Segueway :) | 14:11 |
| sthussey | We can certainly add a service to the chart | 14:11 |
| sthussey | Which will yield a DNS entry that could be used | 14:11 |
| portdirect | would just be a revert of: https://github.com/openstack/airship-armada/commit/eb7c112d2ee8e95ab5a4eda0076c69fdd3aeaf66 | 14:12 |
| evgenyl | Yes. There also an idea to move logic of tiller discovery from shipyard into Armada. | 14:12 |
| sthussey | That likely will happen. | 14:12 |
| mattmceuen | ++ | 14:13 |
| sthussey | Tiller will be running as a sidecar to the armada API in the near future | 14:13 |
| sthussey | So resolving what address to access tiller at will need to be in Armada, so might as well make that location logic good for the CLI as well | 14:13 |
| roman_g | o/ | 14:13 |
| mattmceuen | o/ roman_g | 14:14 |
| evgenyl | sthussey: will it have a separate DNS name when running as a sidecar? | 14:14 |
| evgenyl | Ot will it be possible to configure? | 14:14 |
| sthussey | When running as a sidecar it will be inaccessible to anything but the Armada API it runs with | 14:14 |
| sthussey | So there will need to be a few deployment patterns to support use cases of the Armada CLI | 14:15 |
| evgenyl | I'm trying to understand if this DNS change will make sense if Tiller lands as a sidecar. | 14:15 |
| portdirect | presumably then you'd just have it listen on localhost? so the service would not be exposed at all? | 14:16 |
| evgenyl | Oh, in this case PodIP discovery won't be needed. | 14:16 |
| sthussey | That is in the API case | 14:16 |
| sthussey | Does work for the CLI case | 14:16 |
| mattmceuen | sthussey, are you saying that we'd run tiller-in-armada-pod for an armada API based deployment, but to support the CLI we'd also support standalone tiller pods w/ Service (DNS) ? | 14:16 |
| sthussey | Doesn't * | 14:16 |
| sthussey | Right, would need to support multiple patterns | 14:17 |
| mattmceuen | gotcha | 14:17 |
| mattmceuen | so to say differently, you'd choose your adventure, one of: | 14:18 |
| mattmceuen | 1. Deploy the Armada chart | 14:18 |
| mattmceuen | 2. Deploy the Tiller chart (which will include a Service / DNS) and use the Armada client | 14:18 |
| mattmceuen | depending on the operator use case | 14:18 |
| mattmceuen | So in that case | 14:19 |
| evgenyl | So you can use Armada client without having Armada API service? | 14:19 |
| sthussey | yes | 14:19 |
| evgenyl | Oh, ok, this is clear now. | 14:19 |
| dwalt | The CLI looks for the tiller client with labels | 14:19 |
| dwalt | tiller pod* | 14:20 |
| mattmceuen | The normal way to use the Armada client is ArmadaClient->Tiller directly | 14:20 |
| mattmceuen | Although it can be configured to be ArmadaClient->ArmadaAPI->Tiller as well | 14:21 |
| evgenyl | So to summarize it would like: ArmadaClient-> (DNS) Tiller, ArmadaClient->ArmadaAPI->(localhost)Tiller | 14:22 |
| mattmceuen | Would you be running the armada client from inside the cluster or outside the cluster? Just making sure | 14:22 |
| mark-burnett | AFAIK, nobody is using the configuration of Client -> API -> Tiller | 14:22 |
| mattmceuen | I ask because, if inside the cluster, then the Service will be enough to provide DNS-based routability to tiller | 14:23 |
| evgenyl | mattmceuen: I'm interested in a "standard" Shypard -> ArmadaAPI -> Tiller use case | 14:24 |
| mattmceuen | but if you're trying to get to it from outside the cluster, you'd additionally need an ingress for the service into the cluster, along with *publicly* accessible DNS | 14:24 |
| mattmceuen | ok | 14:24 |
| portdirect | or just expose a port, and use the ip | 14:24 |
| mattmceuen | yeah | 14:24 |
| portdirect | the reason we added the service in osh, was much less about dns, but about having a stable vip to hit tiller with | 14:25 |
| evgenyl | The problem with IP gets back to the initial issue with grpc not supporting cidr in no_proxy, isn't it? | 14:26 |
| sthussey | Which isn't standard | 14:26 |
| sthussey | So not surprising | 14:26 |
| evgenyl | Yes. | 14:26 |
| portdirect | yeah - it does not solve that issue, just providing ontext for where it came from | 14:26 |
| portdirect | *context | 14:26 |
| sthussey | So there are two issues in parallel - 1) address resolution and 2) routing | 14:27 |
| sthussey | Address resolution can use DNS, explicit address or label selection. Only DNS would solve the routing issue | 14:27 |
| sthussey | If we add a `proxy` setting at the armada/Manifest/v1 level that will apply to all charts, it solves #2 and makes #1 moot | 14:28 |
| evgenyl | So are there any objections regarding to this? If not I can start looking into that in my spare time. | 14:30 |
| mattmceuen | evgenyl can you try setting the proxy for each chart like sthusey had suggested earlier for now, and we can look to add a manifest-wide proxy setting in the future? | 14:30 |
| mattmceuen | that would be awesome evgenyl :) | 14:30 |
| evgenyl | Sure, let me update AIAB doc with this info as a quick fix. | 14:31 |
| mattmceuen | thanks man | 14:31 |
| mattmceuen | to wrap up the "tiller lookup" topic: | 14:31 |
| *** dimitris_ has joined #airshipit | 14:32 | |
| *** ab2434_ has joined #airshipit | 14:32 | |
| mattmceuen | when we move tiller in-pod with armada, and armada changes to look tiller up via localhost, seems like a natural point to go ahead and take the lookup functionality out of shipyard, any objections? | 14:32 |
| mattmceuen | any other loose ends? | 14:32 |
| mattmceuen | alright - moving on: | 14:33 |
| mattmceuen | #topic Read the Docs jobs not updating documentation | 14:33 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Read the Docs jobs not updating documentation (Meeting topic: airship)" | 14:33 | |
| mattmceuen | This one's yours dwalt | 14:33 |
| dwalt | This is still an issue AFAIK | 14:33 |
| dwalt | For example, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/628420/1 doesn't appear to have triggered an update | 14:33 |
| dwalt | Has anyone heard anymore official information (outside of http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-infra/2018-December/006247.html) from OpenStack regarding this? | 14:34 |
| sthussey | @roman_g | 14:34 |
| evgenyl | My understanding is infra is waiting for this to be merged | 14:34 |
| evgenyl | #link https://github.com/rtfd/readthedocs.org/issues/4986 | 14:34 |
| portdirect | https://github.com/rtfd/readthedocs.org/pull/5009 | 14:35 |
| portdirect | though no indication of the timeline before this is closed out | 14:36 |
| mattmceuen | it seems pretty active | 14:36 |
| evgenyl | Yes, it is broken for several months already. | 14:36 |
| mattmceuen | I'm leaning toward doing manual rtd updates and give this a chance to get fixed | 14:36 |
| mattmceuen | yes but promising that there's discussion 5 days ago too:) | 14:36 |
| evgenyl | Sorry, not several months, for almost a month :) | 14:36 |
| mattmceuen | i.e. hopefully the end is in sight... we can revert to a token-based push if it does stretch out a long time, but better not to spend the cycles on it if the issue gets resolved soon is what I'm thinking. | 14:37 |
| mattmceuen | agree/disagree? | 14:37 |
| dwalt | Agreed. | 14:37 |
| evgenyl | ++ | 14:37 |
| mattmceuen | awesome | 14:38 |
| mattmceuen | next topic: | 14:38 |
| mattmceuen | #topic Adding Airship in the CNCF Landscape | 14:38 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Adding Airship in the CNCF Landscape (Meeting topic: airship)" | 14:38 | |
| sthussey | Who is doing this manual updates? | 14:38 |
| sthussey | these* | 14:38 |
| mattmceuen | Kaspars is what I hear, sthussey | 14:38 |
| dwalt | I am not sure if that's for all repos or just treasuremap | 14:38 |
| dwalt | It has to be manually triggered via RTD from what I understand | 14:39 |
| dwalt | So whoever has access to the account | 14:39 |
| mattmceuen | let's bring it up in this chat when we need doc updates, kaspars or anyone with rtd access to our account can do it | 14:39 |
| mattmceuen | (I think I might have access, it's been a while :) ) | 14:39 |
| mattmceuen | hogepodge for CNCF landscape, this one's yours! Please educate us on what this thing is | 14:40 |
| mattmceuen | https://landscape.cncf.io/grouping=no&license=open-source | 14:40 |
| mattmceuen | I see Zuul in there | 14:40 |
| hogepodge | So the CNCF landscape is an interactive document that tries to captures integrations between CNCF projects an other open source projects | 14:40 |
| hogepodge | So, Zuul is there because it runs CI jobs for K8s on OpenStack, for example | 14:41 |
| hogepodge | Or Kata because it can be a container runtime for Docker and Kubernetes. | 14:41 |
| hogepodge | Since Airship is essentially deployment and hosting tooling, it makes sense to list it in the landscape | 14:41 |
| portdirect | odd that it shows the market cap of the backing company for single vendor projects | 14:42 |
| mattmceuen | Sounds reasonable to me | 14:42 |
| hogepodge | If there are parts of Airship that can stand alone (like Armada say), there's also a possibility of listing those. | 14:42 |
| portdirect | but that sounds great | 14:42 |
| hogepodge | portdirect: it has some... limitations | 14:42 |
| mattmceuen | is it as simple as filling out some request form hogepodge? Or is there beurocracy :) | 14:42 |
| hogepodge | Like they want to pull all data from github, which is fine with mirrors, but for projects run in Gerrit it loses a bunch of data about issues, code reviews, and so on | 14:43 |
| hogepodge | I've never actually added anything myself, I think it's a pull request | 14:43 |
| hogepodge | #link https://github.com/cncf/landscapeapp | 14:43 |
| hogepodge | #link https://github.com/cncf/landscape | 14:44 |
| hogepodge | "If you think your company or project should be included, please open a pull request to add it to landscape.yml. For the logo, you can either upload an SVG to the hosted_logos directory or put a URL as the value, and it will be fetched." | 14:44 |
| mattmceuen | Sounds reasonable to me -- I think perhaps a single PR with two entries, Airship (as a whole) and Armada, using the same Airship logo would be great | 14:45 |
| mattmceuen | Any volunteers for putting in this PR with CNCF? | 14:45 |
| portdirect | i could if you want? | 14:45 |
| hogepodge | I was about to offer, but portdirect got there first ;-) | 14:46 |
| mattmceuen | lol | 14:46 |
| mattmceuen | he did have a question mark | 14:46 |
| mattmceuen | portdirect if you have bandwidth that would be awesome, ty | 14:46 |
| portdirect | np | 14:46 |
| evrardjp | voluntold | 14:46 |
| mattmceuen | thanks for the find hogepodge, free publicity! | 14:47 |
| portdirect | evrardjp: quite the opposite ;) | 14:47 |
| hogepodge | I've been working with Dan on some of the openstack stuff, so it's been on my mind | 14:47 |
| mattmceuen | volunplease | 14:47 |
| mattmceuen | anything else on this topic? | 14:48 |
| mattmceuen | #topic proposed topic: design overview of ovs-dpdk integration | 14:48 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "proposed topic: design overview of ovs-dpdk integration (Meeting topic: airship)" | 14:48 | |
| mattmceuen | georgek - this one's yours! What do you have in mind? | 14:48 |
| georgk | ok, thanks | 14:48 |
| georgk | so, as you know there is a need and some discussions around ovs dpdk intergration in Airship | 14:49 |
| georgk | I wanted to bring the topic here to have a sanity check of work items that have been indentified | 14:49 |
| georgk | and to figure out who is wokring on this | 14:49 |
| georgk | #link https://wiki.akraino.org/display/AK/Support+of+OVS-DPDK+in+Airship | 14:49 |
| georgk | this wiki pages lists a couple of high-level work items that I have identified which need to be done in order to get the integration done | 14:50 |
| mattmceuen | georgek are there user stories in storyboard for this you could point me toward? I'm catching up on this topic | 14:50 |
| portdirect | ^^ | 14:51 |
| georgk | right, that would be a good next step. no, I am not aware of those | 14:51 |
| georgk | but I am not a huge fan of searching in storyboard (might just be me) | 14:52 |
| georgk | if this list is reasonable, I happy transfer it to storyboard | 14:52 |
| portdirect | it would provide more visibility for sure | 14:52 |
| sthussey | that wiki seems to be a bit misinformed | 14:53 |
| mattmceuen | portdirect, can we carry the OSH-related bits of this to the OSH meeting coming up next in openstack-meeting-5? | 14:53 |
| hogepodge | georgk: aside, if you can file an issue about searching in storyboard in the storyboard storyboard we might have some resources coming online to take a look at it | 14:53 |
| sthussey | Since OSH isn't part of Airship | 14:53 |
| portdirect | i was side-stepping that for the moment sthussey | 14:53 |
| mattmceuen | yeah, let's focus on the Airship-specific bits in the few mins left we have (I need to steal one min at the end for another topic) | 14:54 |
| mattmceuen | "deploy neutron openvswitch agentensure chart of openvswitch agent is deployed" | 14:54 |
| portdirect | but i think in general, if you want to get traction in airship then storyboard will be the forum to do that in | 14:54 |
| portdirect | (the same applies for osh, but i digress) | 14:54 |
| portdirect | as not many of us are chacking akrano wiki often, and it doesnt allow us to tie the work in with patchsets | 14:55 |
| georgk | ok, I agree that it should be in storyboard, I wanted to get a sanity check if the items first | 14:55 |
| mattmceuen | for deployment of the OVS agent - from an AIrship perspective, I think that item above is just a matter of supplying the right configuration to the helm chart via deployment manifests | 14:55 |
| sthussey | Most of the Airship items on that list work today | 14:56 |
| portdirect | `DPDK host config: mount hugepages` this is the area i expect you'll find most sticky | 14:56 |
| georgk | sthussey: even better | 14:56 |
| mattmceuen | Yeah, they're mostly "configs" which are operator-specific | 14:56 |
| mattmceuen | so georgek they may take the form of "as an operator, how do I ..." which we can def help answer | 14:56 |
| georgk | I generally consider most things to be configuration issue, but I´d like to avoid missing major gaps in Airship that need to be addressed | 14:57 |
| mattmceuen | for sure | 14:57 |
| mattmceuen | and I haven't looked deep in the list, there may be enhancements to airship needed | 14:57 |
| portdirect | i dont really see any tbh | 14:57 |
| mattmceuen | even better :) | 14:57 |
| mattmceuen | sorry to rush along, but one timely topic needed | 14:58 |
| mattmceuen | #topic pre-pre-PTG planning | 14:58 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "pre-pre-PTG planning (Meeting topic: airship)" | 14:58 | |
| mattmceuen | We need to reserve a room for Airship at the PTG in Denver | 14:58 |
| georgk | ok, so, we continue on the openstack-helm call, I suppose | 14:58 |
| mattmceuen | seems like we were just in the PTG in Denver | 14:58 |
| mattmceuen | that's what I'm mthinking too georgek | 14:58 |
| mattmceuen | Need to have a ROUGH headcount. Note I don't know how many folks my company will be able to send even, but broadly, who here suspects their company will be sending folks to the PTG? | 14:59 |
| hogepodge | Note PTG is same week as Open Infra Summit, so you can combine both events (or pick just one) | 14:59 |
| mattmceuen | two for one, how can I say no | 15:00 |
| portdirect | :) | 15:00 |
| mattmceuen | well give it some thought guys, I'll try to ballpark a number and get it back to the OSF today | 15:00 |
| mattmceuen | we're out of time! Thanks everyone for the discussion! | 15:00 |
| mattmceuen | #endtopic | 15:00 |
| mattmceuen | #endmeeting | 15:00 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "airshipit.org || General Review Dashboard: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:%255Eopenstack/airship.*+status:open,n,z" | 15:01 | |
| openstack | Meeting ended Tue Jan 8 15:00:59 2019 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 15:01 |
| openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/airship/2019/airship.2019-01-08-14.00.html | 15:01 |
| openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/airship/2019/airship.2019-01-08-14.00.txt | 15:01 |
| openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/airship/2019/airship.2019-01-08-14.00.log.html | 15:01 |
| mattmceuen | and feel free to keep discussing here in the chat room (of course) | 15:01 |
| roman_g | kubectl logs -n ucp maas-ingress-58b687f498-v2lpx -c maas-ingress | 15:03 |
| roman_g | F0108 14:59:41.634737 10 main.go:72] Port 8181 is already in use. Please check the flag --default-server-port | 15:03 |
| roman_g | My maas-ingress is in CrashLoopBackOff. It's airship-in-a-bottle with all updated latest charts/containers. | 15:04 |
| roman_g | Does that sound familiar? What should I look for to get it resolved? | 15:04 |
| roman_g | Thank you. | 15:04 |
| mattmceuen | roman_g I suspect that's related to https://review.openstack.org/#/c/625338/ ; sthussey would airship-in-a-bottle need an additional manifest tweak for that or some such? | 15:19 |
| sthussey | Port conflict w/ cluster ingress | 15:20 |
| sthussey | Just need to add an additional override | 15:20 |
| *** jezogwza has joined #airshipit | 15:25 | |
| mattmceuen | georgek - you were asking about how to set hugepages | 15:31 |
| mattmceuen | those settings go in the host profiles for your site, e.g.: https://github.com/openstack/airship-treasuremap/blob/44dafaa96e6cab5c651fd8fdac9c90fc3f3263a0/site/airship-seaworthy/profiles/host/dp_r720.yaml | 15:31 |
| mattmceuen | specifically, any kernel parameters would go under the `kernel_params` key | 15:33 |
| mattmceuen | additional parameters can be set in the hardware profile, see the schema here for reference: https://github.com/openstack/airship-treasuremap/blob/3a1038e122349aa6599691a7e2c6bf167e93d744/global/schemas/drydock/HardwareProfile/v1.yaml | 15:35 |
| mattmceuen | This would be a good thing to get documented and/or exampled in treasuremap, since it'll be a common thing | 15:35 |
| mattmceuen | in the meantime, please ask any questions you have georgek | 15:37 |
| *** georgk has quit IRC | 15:38 | |
| roman_g | mattmceuen: sthussey thank you | 15:38 |
| sthussey | https://airshipit.readthedocs.io/projects/drydock/en/latest/topology.html#defining-node-configuration | 15:40 |
| *** hamerins has joined #airshipit | 16:00 | |
| openstackgerrit | Lev Morgan proposed openstack/airship-pegleg master: pki: Port Promenade's PKI catalog into Pegleg https://review.openstack.org/606131 | 16:35 |
| openstackgerrit | Samantha Blanco proposed openstack/airship-pegleg master: Add service layer https://review.openstack.org/607623 | 16:49 |
| openstackgerrit | Lev Morgan proposed openstack/airship-pegleg master: pki: Port Promenade's PKI catalog into Pegleg https://review.openstack.org/606131 | 17:00 |
| *** nishant_ has quit IRC | 17:11 | |
| openstackgerrit | Alexander Hughes proposed openstack/airship-pegleg master: Add site master passphrase generation https://review.openstack.org/628021 | 17:48 |
| openstackgerrit | Alexander Hughes proposed openstack/airship-pegleg master: Add site master passphrase generation https://review.openstack.org/628021 | 17:51 |
| *** hamerins has quit IRC | 18:09 | |
| *** hamerins has joined #airshipit | 18:11 | |
| *** zogger__ has joined #airshipit | 18:11 | |
| *** zogger__ has quit IRC | 18:12 | |
| *** ds3330 has joined #airshipit | 18:13 | |
| *** elenalind has joined #airshipit | 18:19 | |
| openstackgerrit | Anthony Bellino proposed openstack/airship-divingbell master: Add rerun support for perm module https://review.openstack.org/629045 | 18:27 |
| openstackgerrit | Lev Morgan proposed openstack/airship-pegleg master: pki: Port Promenade's PKI catalog into Pegleg https://review.openstack.org/606131 | 18:55 |
| *** hamerins has quit IRC | 19:34 | |
| *** hamerins has joined #airshipit | 19:35 | |
| openstackgerrit | Bryan Strassner proposed openstack/airship-in-a-bottle master: Update dns for multinode gates to match endpoints https://review.openstack.org/629297 | 19:46 |
| *** georgk has joined #airshipit | 19:50 | |
| openstackgerrit | chinasubbareddy mallavarapu proposed openstack/airship-treasuremap master: Airship-treasuremap: Ceph charts cleanup https://review.openstack.org/629302 | 19:56 |
| *** jamesgu_ has joined #airshipit | 20:03 | |
| *** elenalind has quit IRC | 20:27 | |
| openstackgerrit | PRATEEK REDDY DODDA proposed openstack/airship-drydock master: Added line no to drydock message format for troubeshooting https://review.openstack.org/626367 | 20:41 |
| openstackgerrit | Samantha Blanco proposed openstack/airship-shipyard master: Adds HTTP Security Headers https://review.openstack.org/628286 | 20:42 |
| openstackgerrit | Alexander Hughes proposed openstack/airship-pegleg master: Add site master passphrase generation https://review.openstack.org/628021 | 20:53 |
| openstackgerrit | Sean Eagan proposed openstack/airship-armada master: Automate deletion of test pods https://review.openstack.org/629313 | 21:09 |
| *** hamerins has quit IRC | 21:14 | |
| *** hamerins has joined #airshipit | 21:15 | |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/airship-drydock master: Added line no to drydock message format for troubeshooting https://review.openstack.org/626367 | 21:35 |
| *** JosW has joined #airshipit | 21:58 | |
| *** JosW has quit IRC | 22:10 | |
| openstackgerrit | Bryan Strassner proposed openstack/airship-shipyard master: [WIP] Move airflow scheduler to worker statefulset https://review.openstack.org/629042 | 22:14 |
| *** georgk has quit IRC | 22:18 | |
| *** hamerins has quit IRC | 23:13 | |
| *** ab2434_ has quit IRC | 23:38 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!