| openstackgerrit | Tin Lam proposed openstack/airship-armada master: Fix an Armada wait error https://review.openstack.org/650557 | 01:16 |
|---|---|---|
| *** sthussey has quit IRC | 01:51 | |
| *** debugger_io has quit IRC | 01:56 | |
| openstackgerrit | Rahul Khiyani proposed openstack/airship-maas master: [WIP]Maas: Add pod/container security context - deployment-ingress-errors.yaml - deployment-maas-ingress.yaml https://review.openstack.org/639200 | 01:59 |
| *** roman_g has quit IRC | 02:29 | |
| *** licanwei has joined #airshipit | 02:40 | |
| openstackgerrit | Rahul Khiyani proposed openstack/airship-maas master: [WIP]Maas: Add pod/container security context - deployment-ingress-errors.yaml https://review.openstack.org/639200 | 03:15 |
| *** prabhjot has quit IRC | 03:51 | |
| *** kaspars__ has joined #airshipit | 04:22 | |
| *** jamesgu has quit IRC | 06:14 | |
| *** kaspars__ has quit IRC | 06:48 | |
| *** roman_g has joined #airshipit | 07:39 | |
| *** happyhemant has joined #airshipit | 07:48 | |
| *** aojea has joined #airshipit | 08:03 | |
| *** bh526r has quit IRC | 08:04 | |
| *** debugger_io has joined #airshipit | 08:42 | |
| *** debugger_io has quit IRC | 09:50 | |
| *** debugger_io has joined #airshipit | 10:12 | |
| *** debugger_io has quit IRC | 10:15 | |
| *** debugger_io has joined #airshipit | 10:16 | |
| *** debugger_io has quit IRC | 10:18 | |
| *** debugger_io has joined #airshipit | 10:24 | |
| *** debugger_io has quit IRC | 10:28 | |
| *** debugger_io has joined #airshipit | 10:39 | |
| happyhemant | hello folks, i was trying to deploy horizon on kubernetes cluster with openstack. when I tried to deploy horizon I get some strange error I dont have an idea what is it exactly may be some one is familier with this and help me to solve my issue help will be mich appreciated. thanks https://www.irccloud.com/pastebin/FM7brR5B/ | 10:44 |
| *** arunkant has joined #airshipit | 12:31 | |
| *** openstackgerrit has quit IRC | 12:44 | |
| *** bh526r has joined #airshipit | 12:51 | |
| *** sthussey has joined #airshipit | 12:58 | |
| *** mbeierl has joined #airshipit | 13:02 | |
| *** debugger_io has quit IRC | 13:02 | |
| *** debugger_io has joined #airshipit | 13:06 | |
| *** openstackgerrit has joined #airshipit | 13:14 | |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/airship-armada master: Fix an Armada wait error https://review.openstack.org/650557 | 13:14 |
| *** debugger_io has quit IRC | 13:16 | |
| *** debugger_io has joined #airshipit | 13:17 | |
| *** aaronsheffield has joined #airshipit | 13:21 | |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/airship-armada master: End user logging for audit traceabilty https://review.openstack.org/638124 | 13:22 |
| *** prabhjot has joined #airshipit | 13:25 | |
| openstackgerrit | Sean Eagan proposed openstack/airship-armada master: Introduce v2 docs https://review.openstack.org/648246 | 13:29 |
| *** ab2434_ has joined #airshipit | 13:42 | |
| *** debugger_io has quit IRC | 13:58 | |
| *** sgrasley__ has quit IRC | 14:02 | |
| *** sgrasley has joined #airshipit | 14:02 | |
| openstackgerrit | Ian Pittwood proposed openstack/airship-spyglass master: [WIP] Various fixes to Spyglass to resolve tox errors https://review.openstack.org/648764 | 14:10 |
| *** kaspars__ has joined #airshipit | 14:12 | |
| dwalt | happyhemant: o/ Do you have any additional logs from Armada? Looking for anything that shows it quitting unexpectedly during a previous deployment | 14:13 |
| openstackgerrit | Sean Eagan proposed openstack/airship-armada master: Introduce v2 docs https://review.openstack.org/648246 | 14:14 |
| *** prabhjot has quit IRC | 14:15 | |
| kaspars__ | @kranthikirang when MAAS node is enlisted via PXE it will download some ubuntu package and will require proxy. | 14:15 |
| kaspars__ | Usually as PXE network doesn't have direct access to internet, you can use combination of proxy, as well as MAAS in-built proxy that should make it work | 14:15 |
| kaspars__ | https://github.com/openstack/airship-maas/blob/master/charts/maas/values.yaml#L173 | 14:16 |
| happyhemant | dwalt: all works fine for me but if i tried to redeploy manifest it gives me this strange error :( | 14:16 |
| *** michael-beaver has joined #airshipit | 14:17 | |
| kaspars__ | you will need a) proxy_enabled: true, peer_proxy_enabled: true, proxy_server: "http://your-proxy-here.com:8080" | 14:17 |
| kaspars__ | for MAAS chart/overrides | 14:17 |
| happyhemant | dwalt: I dont have other logs except these https://www.irccloud.com/pastebin/t9Re8qQg/ | 14:19 |
| dwalt | happyhemant: Do you have Tiller deployed in your cluster or are you using the Tiller that runs in the Armada pod? | 14:20 |
| openstackgerrit | Dimitrios Markou proposed openstack/airship-treasuremap master: [WIP] Integrate VIPs in airship-seaworthy https://review.openstack.org/650432 | 14:20 |
| happyhemant | dwalt: yes i have it https://www.irccloud.com/pastebin/UmiUezmQ/ | 14:21 |
| happyhemant | it si deplpyed in my cluster | 14:23 |
| happyhemant | it is deployed in my cluster* | 14:23 |
| dwalt | happyhemant: michael-beaver did a lot of the work to implement this and recently told me that each lock should have a ten minute timeout. Can you try to run armada apply again to see if armada ignores the existing lock? | 14:31 |
| sthussey | @happyhemant did you ctrl-c out of an Armada apply operation? | 14:31 |
| dwalt | If a previous Armada quit unexpectedly, it could leave an orphan lock | 14:32 |
| happyhemant | sthussey: yes i did that dwalt: yes i experiance this timout thing but if i want to redeploy manifest it doesnt work i can not redeploy it again as it is giving same error | 14:35 |
| sthussey | You'll need to manually delete the Armada Lock CR in kubernetes | 14:35 |
| happyhemant | sthussey: to be honest i dont know how to delete could you please tell me ? | 14:36 |
| sthussey | @michael-beaver do you have a quick reference for that? | 14:38 |
| michael-beaver | if you run `kubectl get locks` does it come up with anything? | 14:38 |
| michael-beaver | And like dwalt was mentioning, if there is an orphan lock, the full lock expiration time is set to a default of 10 minutes, so if a lock is over 10 minutes old when armada starts it will go ahead and remove it before continuing | 14:40 |
| happyhemant | michael-beaver : `kubectl get locks` no it give me no resources found. I tried to metion namespaces too but no results | 14:41 |
| happyhemant | michael-beaver : yeah I know about 10 min timout but I chnaged some parameters in `amrada-osh.yaml` file and tried to redeploy it but same error is popping up all the time as i am trying since from last one hour | 14:43 |
| openstackgerrit | Lakshmi Prasanna Goutham Pratapa proposed openstack/airship-promenade master: Add Liveness/Readiness probe to calico-etcd. https://review.openstack.org/645561 | 14:45 |
| happyhemant | michael-beaver : so finally after almost one hour it worked for me I can able to redploy without deleting or chnaging anything | 14:45 |
| *** lemko has joined #airshipit | 14:45 | |
| michael-beaver | So it finally went through? My only thought is that there is/was an armada out there that was continuing to update the lock as it was continuing to do something, as otherwise the old lock being there shouldn't matter | 14:47 |
| michael-beaver | So if it is working now, what does `kubectl get locks --all-namespaces` do for you? | 14:48 |
| lemko | Theses locks in armada look interesting. | 14:51 |
| happyhemant | https://www.irccloud.com/pastebin/DZMTcD9J/ | 14:52 |
| happyhemant | michael-beaver: this is what i get now https://www.irccloud.com/pastebin/IN0iAKKB/ | 14:54 |
| michael-beaver | Awesome! well it looks like it was able to override the previous lock. Just to follow up on what sthussey was saying, in order to manually delete it you should be able to run `kubectl delete locks -n kube-system locks.armada.process.lock` | 14:56 |
| portdirect | michael-beaver: how do you enable locks in a cluster? | 14:58 |
| portdirect | i know somewhat tangental to the above, but I dont seem to have that resource type in my clusters? | 14:59 |
| portdirect | https://www.irccloud.com/pastebin/IFbduB9D/ | 14:59 |
| portdirect | dwalt ^ | 15:02 |
| michael-beaver | With the newest version of Armada it is enabled by default | 15:04 |
| dwalt | portdirect: michael-beaver: it's a custom resource definition, right? I think in order to add one to your cluster, you'd have to create an API document for the resource https://kubernetes.io/docs/tasks/access-kubernetes-api/custom-resources/custom-resource-definitions/#create-a-customresourcedefinition | 15:06 |
| openstackgerrit | Rahul Khiyani proposed openstack/airship-maas master: Maas: Add pod/container security context - deployment-ingress-errors.yaml https://review.openstack.org/639200 | 15:06 |
| happyhemant | dwalt: michael-beaver: sthussey: thanks alot guys for help its working fine now :) | 15:08 |
| sthussey | The Armada chart creates the CRD | 15:08 |
| michael-beaver | dwalt: For the case of Armada, it uses the K8s API to create the CRD so it can get acquire the lock in the bootstrapping phase of genesis | 15:09 |
| openstackgerrit | Ian Pittwood proposed openstack/airship-spyglass master: [WIP] PEP-8 code styling and linting https://review.openstack.org/649692 | 15:14 |
| *** jamesgu has joined #airshipit | 15:15 | |
| mattmceuen | Hi all -- here's the agenda for our meeting in a half hour: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/airship-meeting-2019-04-09 | 15:27 |
| mattmceuen | Please add anything you'd like to discuss today | 15:27 |
| portdirect | sthussey: looks like armada itself creates it: https://github.com/openstack/airship-armada/commit/48920224cc3f70bf1414839de65837fffbfebb68 | 15:39 |
| portdirect | pretty cool michael-beaver | 15:39 |
| sthussey | Even better | 15:39 |
| portdirect | it would be really nice to pull some of this into its own thing - k8s locks would really have huge value across the spectrum | 15:41 |
| *** michael-beaver has quit IRC | 15:42 | |
| *** levmorgan has joined #airshipit | 15:43 | |
| *** michaelbeaver has joined #airshipit | 15:48 | |
| mattmceuen | #startmeeting airship | 16:00 |
| openstack | Meeting started Tue Apr 9 16:00:42 2019 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is mattmceuen. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 16:00 |
| openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 16:00 |
| *** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: airship)" | 16:00 | |
| openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'airship' | 16:00 |
| mattmceuen | #topic Rollcall | 16:00 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Rollcall (Meeting topic: airship)" | 16:00 | |
| mattmceuen | GM / GE everyone! | 16:00 |
| dwalt | o/ gm! | 16:01 |
| michaelbeaver | o/ GM | 16:01 |
| mattmceuen | Here's the agenda for today: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/airship-meeting-2019-04-09 | 16:01 |
| seaneagan | o/ | 16:01 |
| levmorgan | o/ | 16:01 |
| mattmceuen | let's give it a couple mins for folks to trickle in and add items to the agenda | 16:01 |
| *** michaelbeaver has quit IRC | 16:01 | |
| arunkant | o/ | 16:01 |
| mfuller_ | o/ | 16:01 |
| *** michaelbeaver has joined #airshipit | 16:02 | |
| *** shauno_ has joined #airshipit | 16:02 | |
| *** jezogwza has joined #airshipit | 16:02 | |
| mattmceuen | hey everyone thanks for joining | 16:02 |
| *** jamesgu__ has joined #airshipit | 16:03 | |
| mattmceuen | ok, let's get started | 16:03 |
| mattmceuen | #topic How do manage Roadmaps for Airship | 16:03 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "How do manage Roadmaps for Airship (Meeting topic: airship)" | 16:04 | |
| mattmceuen | Rodolfo wanted to discuss this one -- from the agenda | 16:04 |
| mattmceuen | How does Roadmap items / features relate to storyboard or patchsets or labels | 16:04 |
| mattmceuen | How do roadmap features relate to treasuremap Monthly Tags | 16:04 |
| mattmceuen | All yours jezogwza | 16:04 |
| jezogwza | Ok, originlly when we started we used milestones in git to drive definition of features and or milestone releases for the project. Doesnt seem we are doign that anymore | 16:05 |
| jezogwza | Just wondering how we get back to something that allows us to build automation for the treasuremap , and release notes, etc that we can get behind | 16:06 |
| mattmceuen | Excellent topic | 16:06 |
| mattmceuen | As dwalt and myself scraped a ton of git logs to handcraft some release notes, this is near to my heart ;-) | 16:07 |
| jezogwza | Do we know how other projects approach this? | 16:07 |
| sthussey | There are several systems for turning the git history into release notes | 16:07 |
| openstackgerrit | Rahul Khiyani proposed openstack/airship-maas master: Maas: Add pod/container security context - deployment-ingress-errors.yaml https://review.openstack.org/639200 | 16:08 |
| mattmceuen | The OpenStack standard-ish way is to use the OPenStack Reno project -- https://docs.openstack.org/reno/latest/ | 16:08 |
| *** shauno_ has quit IRC | 16:09 | |
| mattmceuen | But I'd be interested in a value comparison among choices | 16:09 |
| mattmceuen | Anyone have substantial experience (or opinions) on this? | 16:09 |
| *** shauno_ has joined #airshipit | 16:09 | |
| dwalt | I see that there is a sphinx extension for the openstack-reno one, that's a bonus | 16:10 |
| mattmceuen | I did try setting up Reno once for OSH, but it never merged :)) | 16:10 |
| * mattmceuen the extent of matts experience | 16:11 | |
| dwalt | mattmceuen: do you still have a link to that patch? Would be interested in taking a look at how it's set up | 16:11 |
| jezogwza | That reno sounds interesting, how however that doesn't solve for Feature management/Roadmap etc. But it could be at least part of that puzzle. | 16:11 |
| sthussey | I think to get real value you'd first need better upstream tracking of defects and enhancements | 16:11 |
| mattmceuen | Yep: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/563481/ | 16:11 |
| mattmceuen | Agree sthussey | 16:11 |
| sthussey | Generally any of these systems are about turning metadata in commit messages into links to existing artifacts | 16:11 |
| mattmceuen | Let's start there | 16:11 |
| sthussey | https://github.com/github-tools/github-release-notes | 16:12 |
| mattmceuen | So one thing we make hit-or-miss use of so far is using the "Story:" and "Task:" metadata in our commits | 16:12 |
| mattmceuen | Those drive story lifecycle in storyboard if you use 'em | 16:12 |
| jezogwza | Seems reasonable to start with choosing one of this tools as our next step. | 16:14 |
| sthussey | https://blogs.sap.com/2018/06/22/generating-release-notes-from-git-commit-messages-using-basic-shell-commands-gitgrep/ | 16:14 |
| mattmceuen | Since kaspars__ is driving monthly releases of Treasuremap (and therefore, of "packaged" airship) does it make sense to start targeting/tracking scope in storyboard for these releases? | 16:14 |
| jezogwza | I was hoping along with his monthly tags, we could at least delivery an understandig of what change between tags | 16:15 |
| mattmceuen | ++ | 16:15 |
| sthussey | It will be non-trivial to generate that documentation | 16:15 |
| mattmceuen | Monthly release notes will make Summittime release notes easy :) | 16:15 |
| sthussey | As his tagged 'release' is an integration of lots of pieces | 16:15 |
| sthussey | So either his release notes will just be 'Upgraded Airship-Drydock to x.y.z' | 16:16 |
| sthussey | Or he'll need to start pulling in all the changes for all the pieces being integrated | 16:16 |
| mattmceuen | Yeah, it will take some transitive data gathering to make that meaningful | 16:16 |
| jezogwza | Could it be that each project can generate its own, and treasuremap just collects. | 16:16 |
| *** shauno_ has quit IRC | 16:16 | |
| seaneagan | we also don't even have x.y.z for airship components yet | 16:16 |
| mattmceuen | The other option is to track scope / monthly releases in storyboard, and let that drive things-- storyboard tying it together directly, rather than the treasuremap integration per se | 16:17 |
| jezogwza | Well it could be ok to start with Dydock : ps 1.. 10, Promenade psn..m, etc | 16:17 |
| jezogwza | Its better than nothing | 16:17 |
| sthussey | I would start with a commit message standard to contain the information that should go in the notes | 16:18 |
| sthussey | because that is going to be the foundation of anything else | 16:18 |
| mattmceuen | The little I know about Reno: it uses a file full of metadata in the project, and then as "changelog worthy" changes are made, the file is appended to as part of the came commit | 16:19 |
| mattmceuen | Just a different spin on the commit message approach | 16:19 |
| sthussey | I prefer the mechanism of just turning commit msgs into release notes | 16:19 |
| sthussey | For a commit that should be omitted, that can be declared in the commit msg | 16:20 |
| sthussey | By default all commits should be accounted for in the release notes IMO | 16:20 |
| *** shauno_ has joined #airshipit | 16:20 | |
| mattmceuen | I suggest let's let this topic rest for today - think about it, select some potential tools / approaches, and revisit in a couple weeks. Agree? | 16:20 |
| jezogwza | Agree | 16:21 |
| sthussey | Sure | 16:21 |
| dwalt | Sounds like a plan | 16:21 |
| mattmceuen | Ok cool. I'll go out of order on the agenda slightly to make this a segueway then | 16:21 |
| mattmceuen | #topic Airship PTG agenda | 16:21 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Airship PTG agenda (Meeting topic: airship)" | 16:21 | |
| mattmceuen | https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/airship-ptg-train | 16:21 |
| mattmceuen | I took an initial stab at an agenda for the PTG | 16:22 |
| mattmceuen | The PTG will be extra short this year, but there will be forums and things at the Summit proper, so I expect some convo to happen ahead of time | 16:22 |
| mattmceuen | Please add in anything you'd like to discuss to the agenda, and then the things that we fit into our day-and-a-half of focused discussion will be prioritized based on what needs the most discussion, and who's able to be there & what they want to discuss | 16:23 |
| *** debugger_io has joined #airshipit | 16:23 | |
| mattmceuen | The segueway bit is that I took a stab at laying out our big rocks of post airship 1.0 roadmap scope | 16:23 |
| *** jezogwza has quit IRC | 16:24 | |
| mattmceuen | I'm sure I missed some things so please add them in if so | 16:24 |
| *** shauno_ has quit IRC | 16:24 | |
| mattmceuen | I will plan to do a comparison between storyboard and that list to get them trued up a bit, as I know that's not all outlined in storyboard yet | 16:24 |
| mattmceuen | Heads up that our PTG meeting time is Friday afternoon and Saturday morning and afternoon | 16:25 |
| mattmceuen | If you have to cut out early please make a note in the etherpad so we prioritize things that need to be discussed on Friday with folks that will be there | 16:25 |
| mattmceuen | That's all I have on that topic, anything else? | 16:25 |
| mattmceuen | Ok, moving on: | 16:26 |
| mattmceuen | #topic Proposed additional project: airship-governance | 16:26 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Proposed additional project: airship-governance (Meeting topic: airship)" | 16:26 | |
| *** shauno_ has joined #airshipit | 16:27 | |
| mattmceuen | We want to post a draft formal Airship governance document, so that we can iterate on discussion and fine tuning it | 16:27 |
| mattmceuen | We need a place to push a patchset :) | 16:27 |
| *** shauno_ has quit IRC | 16:27 | |
| mattmceuen | OpenStack and Starling-X both have their own dedicated governance repos (links in agenda) and that seems to me to be a reasonable approach | 16:27 |
| mattmceuen | As previously discussed we should get some quorum here before creating any new airship repos | 16:28 |
| mattmceuen | Are you all ok with that approach for managing governance docs? Or better ideas? | 16:28 |
| mattmceuen | The value of a separate repo is 1) opportunity to limit the +2'ers down the road, 2) the repo won't change as frequently as other documentation | 16:29 |
| mattmceuen | Please vote with +1 or -1 | 16:29 |
| dwalt | +1 | 16:29 |
| michaelbeaver | +1 | 16:29 |
| *** debugger_io has quit IRC | 16:30 | |
| jamesgu__ | +1 | 16:30 |
| arunkant | +1 | 16:30 |
| mattmceuen | Thanks guys - I will count that as "timeboxed unanimous" :) | 16:31 |
| mfuller_ | +1 | 16:31 |
| mattmceuen | Hope to get draft governance in front of y'all in short order | 16:31 |
| mattmceuen | #action mattmceuen to submit request to create airship-governance repo | 16:31 |
| mattmceuen | #action mattmceuen to review storyboard content against proposed roadmap scope in the PTG etherpad | 16:32 |
| mattmceuen | ok, moving on: | 16:32 |
| mattmceuen | #topic Multi-distro spec : How to get final inputs and approval | 16:32 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Multi-distro spec : How to get final inputs and approval (Meeting topic: airship)" | 16:32 | |
| mattmceuen | thanks for refreshing this arunkant | 16:32 |
| mattmceuen | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/643106/ | 16:33 |
| arunkant | So looks like there are number of comments on suggestion and seems to be agreement on most of topics . | 16:34 |
| mattmceuen | Agree | 16:34 |
| mattmceuen | For folks who have given this a review already - let's give it a final review today | 16:34 |
| arunkant | okay..so can we target this to be reviewed and possibly approved by end of this week ? | 16:35 |
| mattmceuen | I think we should aim for that target - let's get this done | 16:35 |
| arunkant | okay..thanks | 16:36 |
| mattmceuen | anything else on the multi-distro topic today folks? | 16:36 |
| mattmceuen | ok - moving on: | 16:37 |
| mattmceuen | #topic What is the recommended approach to Tempest testing in an Airship deployed site? | 16:37 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "What is the recommended approach to Tempest testing in an Airship deployed site? (Meeting topic: airship)" | 16:37 | |
| mattmceuen | mfuller_ raised this | 16:37 |
| mattmceuen | I think this is a multifaceted question mfuller_ | 16:38 |
| mattmceuen | Are you thinking along the lines of testing Airship itself via Tempest, or testing a deployed OpenStack on top of Airship? | 16:38 |
| mfuller_ | The latter, sorry I should have been more specific | 16:38 |
| mattmceuen | No worries, I think they're both good questions ;-) | 16:39 |
| mattmceuen | So yeah, the helm test flag on OSH components to use tempest is more geared around "helm test" type scenarios - smoke testing or ensuring the widget got deployed right | 16:39 |
| mattmceuen | There is also a Tempest helm chart that OSH has that can be used for more full-suite Tempest validation | 16:40 |
| mattmceuen | I'm not a Tempest expert, but I think the guys in #openstack-helm can probably point you to resources on how to get this started | 16:40 |
| mattmceuen | So that is to say, "standalone chart" and "helm test" both have their place side by side | 16:41 |
| mfuller_ | My experience so far with the run_tempest flag has been mixed. Since it can be enabled per chart, I was expecting the tests would only require that service to be available, but even for services like glance, it requires a compute endpoint to already be defined and running | 16:41 |
| mfuller_ | However, if I instead wait until all OpenStack services are running, I've then run into an issue with the default roles that are created in keystone. The tempest verifier expects 'Member' to be there, but there's only 'member' | 16:43 |
| mattmceuen | ug | 16:43 |
| mfuller_ | and a duplicate role error occurs | 16:43 |
| mfuller_ | So I wasn't sure if going this route was the best approach | 16:44 |
| mattmceuen | I know that's something that had been dealt with in the past; I thought the OSH team had ironed those things out -- possible that a few remained hidden though. I believe the problem may have been that some of the Members changed to members (or vice versa) in some openstack release IIRC | 16:44 |
| mattmceuen | I suggest you bring up that error in #openstack-helm and see if some of the tempest wizards there are already aware and have advice, or, if that's news | 16:45 |
| mfuller_ | Are there plans to implement a global chart for tempest in treasuremap? | 16:45 |
| mattmceuen | I don't think there are plans now, but I don't see why it couldn't be added | 16:46 |
| mattmceuen | Would you be able to collaborate on that mfuller_? | 16:47 |
| mfuller_ | Sure, absolutely, with the caveat that my chart authoring skills are still very green ;) | 16:48 |
| mattmceuen | As the airship team knows the manifest parts well, but less experience with the tempest parts | 16:48 |
| mattmceuen | Perfect collaboration then :) | 16:48 |
| mattmceuen | #action mattmceuen to create Storyboard story to track adding Tempest to Treasuremap | 16:48 |
| mattmceuen | thanks for bringing that up | 16:48 |
| mattmceuen | #topic Roundtable | 16:49 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Roundtable (Meeting topic: airship)" | 16:49 | |
| mattmceuen | Any other topics you's like to discuss today? | 16:49 |
| jamesgu__ | matt: this may have been discussed previously... the airship services has its own htk definition, and osh services uses a common one. what's the reasons behind the difference? | 16:50 |
| dwalt | I don't think roman_g is here, but does anyone know what items are outstanding for the transition to opendev? | 16:50 |
| mattmceuen | jamesgu__: I think the only difference is that they were assembled by different teams. There are pros/cons both ways | 16:51 |
| jamesgu__ | we had a case (at leaast temporarily) we need to use a different version of htk between openstack services. | 16:51 |
| mattmceuen | jamesgu__: in particular, the OSH comonents are all integrated together very frequently with OSH-Infra, so it pushes a little more toward the "keep it simple" approach as there's less likelihood of getting one version of HTK that is not compatible with all OSH charts | 16:52 |
| jamesgu__ | the use case we have is to upgrade/update a openstack service | 16:53 |
| mattmceuen | jamesgu__: OTOH Airship is a collection of different projects, each of which may need to be pinned to a particular HTK due to compatibility reasons (e.g. recently a HTK upgrade impacted divingbell only) | 16:53 |
| jamesgu__ | right, I was wondering if the osh global charts in airship could build in the same flexbility of different htk chart versions. | 16:54 |
| mattmceuen | Since it's all configuration-driven, I think that based on operator needs it's totally fine to have more than one HTK definition for an OSH setup when warranted | 16:54 |
| mattmceuen | kaspars__ or evgenyl, do you have an opinion on that? | 16:54 |
| mattmceuen | dwalt: I haven't heard any updates. Happen to know when roman_g is back? | 16:55 |
| mattmceuen | jamesgu - can I add this as a topic for next week's meeting and get folks to think about it before then? | 16:56 |
| jamesgu__ | yes absolutely. thanks! | 16:56 |
| *** shauno_ has joined #airshipit | 16:56 | |
| mattmceuen | #action mattmceuen get some thoughts on splitting out HTK pins for OSH in TM | 16:56 |
| kaspars__ | I agree, in my view each component should have it's own HTK (e.g. nova, keystone) - but good to hear from OSH team more | 16:56 |
| mattmceuen | That's exactly what I'm thinking too kaspars__, good to see what their lessons learned are | 16:57 |
| mattmceuen | Couple minutes left, any last topics to bring up? | 16:57 |
| mattmceuen | In that case -- thanks everyone for a great meeting | 16:58 |
| mattmceuen | Appreciate your time and thought | 16:58 |
| mattmceuen | have a good week. | 16:58 |
| mattmceuen | #endmeeting | 16:58 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "airshipit.org || General Review Dashboard: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:%255Eopenstack/airship.*+status:open,n,z" | 16:58 | |
| openstack | Meeting ended Tue Apr 9 16:58:41 2019 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 16:58 |
| openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/airship/2019/airship.2019-04-09-16.00.html | 16:58 |
| openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/airship/2019/airship.2019-04-09-16.00.txt | 16:58 |
| openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/airship/2019/airship.2019-04-09-16.00.log.html | 16:58 |
| *** shauno_ has quit IRC | 17:00 | |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/airship-pegleg master: Increase coverage threshold of tox tests to 87% https://review.openstack.org/650925 | 17:05 |
| openstackgerrit | Felipe Monteiro proposed openstack/airship-pegleg master: Refactor: Consolidate catalog/catalogs engine directories together https://review.openstack.org/651331 | 17:07 |
| openstackgerrit | Felipe Monteiro proposed openstack/airship-pegleg master: Refactor: Consolidate catalog/catalogs engine directories together https://review.openstack.org/651331 | 17:16 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/airship-pegleg master: PKI Cert generation and check updates https://review.openstack.org/639414 | 17:18 |
| *** michaelbeaver has quit IRC | 17:31 | |
| *** michael-beaver has joined #airshipit | 17:34 | |
| openstackgerrit | Alexander Hughes proposed openstack/airship-pegleg master: Update validity checks and docs of PKI functions https://review.openstack.org/651336 | 17:35 |
| openstackgerrit | Alexander Hughes proposed openstack/airship-pegleg master: Update validity checks and docs of PKI functions https://review.openstack.org/651336 | 17:36 |
| *** debugger_io has joined #airshipit | 17:43 | |
| *** happyhemant has quit IRC | 18:38 | |
| openstackgerrit | Evgeniy L proposed openstack/airship-in-a-bottle master: Fix broken Nova and Neutron deployment https://review.openstack.org/651002 | 18:53 |
| openstackgerrit | Ian Pittwood proposed openstack/airship-spyglass master: [WIP] PEP-8 code styling and linting https://review.openstack.org/649692 | 19:10 |
| openstackgerrit | Arijit Bose proposed openstack/airship-in-a-bottle master: [site update] Adding gate set up https://review.openstack.org/646796 | 19:13 |
| openstackgerrit | Ian Pittwood proposed openstack/airship-spyglass master: Resolves Bandit 101 errors from misusing asserts https://review.openstack.org/650977 | 19:14 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/airship-in-a-bottle master: Fix broken Nova and Neutron deployment https://review.openstack.org/651002 | 19:21 |
| openstackgerrit | Ian Pittwood proposed openstack/airship-spyglass master: Refactors CLI to match style of Airship CLIs https://review.openstack.org/649452 | 19:29 |
| openstackgerrit | Ian Pittwood proposed openstack/airship-spyglass master: Refactors CLI to match style of Airship CLIs https://review.openstack.org/649452 | 19:31 |
| openstackgerrit | Ian Pittwood proposed openstack/airship-spyglass master: [WIP] Revise CLI documentation https://review.openstack.org/650137 | 19:33 |
| openstackgerrit | Dimitrios Markou proposed openstack/airship-treasuremap master: [WIP] Integrate VIPs in airship-seaworthy https://review.openstack.org/650432 | 19:37 |
| openstackgerrit | Ian Pittwood proposed openstack/airship-spyglass master: [WIP] Revise CLI documentation https://review.openstack.org/650137 | 19:38 |
| *** jamesgu has quit IRC | 19:46 | |
| openstackgerrit | Ian Pittwood proposed openstack/airship-spyglass master: Resolves Bandit 101 errors from misusing asserts https://review.openstack.org/650977 | 19:47 |
| openstackgerrit | Rick Bartra proposed openstack/airship-drydock master: Add CIDR validation for MAAS https://review.openstack.org/648781 | 19:51 |
| openstackgerrit | Ian Pittwood proposed openstack/airship-spyglass master: [WIP] Remove flask yaml-editor from Spyglass https://review.openstack.org/650993 | 19:58 |
| openstackgerrit | Ian Pittwood proposed openstack/airship-spyglass master: [WIP] Remove flask yaml-editor from Spyglass https://review.openstack.org/650993 | 19:59 |
| openstackgerrit | Rick Bartra proposed openstack/airship-drydock master: Add CIDR validation for MAAS https://review.openstack.org/648781 | 19:59 |
| openstackgerrit | Rick Bartra proposed openstack/airship-drydock master: Add CIDR validation for MAAS https://review.openstack.org/648781 | 20:05 |
| *** jamesgu has joined #airshipit | 20:06 | |
| *** aojea has quit IRC | 20:19 | |
| openstackgerrit | Sean Eagan proposed openstack/airship-armada master: Fix log message https://review.openstack.org/651375 | 20:24 |
| *** debugger_io has quit IRC | 20:32 | |
| openstackgerrit | Ian Pittwood proposed openstack/airship-spyglass master: [WIP] Various fixes to Spyglass to resolve tox errors https://review.openstack.org/648764 | 20:32 |
| *** lemko has quit IRC | 20:44 | |
| openstackgerrit | Dimitrios Markou proposed openstack/airship-treasuremap master: [WIP] Integrate VIPs in airship-seaworthy https://review.openstack.org/650432 | 20:47 |
| openstackgerrit | Ian Pittwood proposed openstack/airship-spyglass master: Various fixes to Spyglass to resolve tox errors https://review.openstack.org/648764 | 20:48 |
| openstackgerrit | Ian Pittwood proposed openstack/airship-spyglass master: [WIP] PEP-8 code styling and linting https://review.openstack.org/649692 | 20:51 |
| openstackgerrit | Scott Hussey proposed openstack/airship-promenade master: (apiserver) [WIP] support key rotation https://review.openstack.org/631935 | 20:59 |
| openstackgerrit | Lev Morgan proposed openstack/airship-pegleg master: Fix multiple I/O issues in cert generation https://review.openstack.org/643678 | 21:28 |
| openstackgerrit | Anthony Bellino proposed openstack/airship-divingbell master: [WIP] Initial Ansible Daemonset https://review.openstack.org/640539 | 21:47 |
| openstackgerrit | Arun Kant proposed openstack/airship-shipyard master: Adding opensuse support in image building of airflow and shipyard https://review.openstack.org/636229 | 21:47 |
| openstackgerrit | Kaspars Skels proposed openstack/airship-treasuremap master: [wip] Add sloop type and airsloop site https://review.openstack.org/649195 | 21:54 |
| openstackgerrit | Arun Kant proposed openstack/airship-deckhand master: Adding opensuse image build for deckhand https://review.openstack.org/638301 | 22:28 |
| *** ab2434_ has quit IRC | 22:33 | |
| openstackgerrit | Arun Kant proposed openstack/airship-shipyard master: Adding opensuse support in image building of airflow and shipyard https://review.openstack.org/636229 | 22:35 |
| openstackgerrit | Arun Kant proposed openstack/airship-deckhand master: Adding opensuse image build for deckhand https://review.openstack.org/638301 | 22:37 |
| *** aaronsheffield has quit IRC | 23:10 | |
| openstackgerrit | Arun Kant proposed openstack/airship-armada master: Support armada to run on opensuse image leap15 https://review.openstack.org/637327 | 23:17 |
| openstackgerrit | Arun Kant proposed openstack/airship-pegleg master: Support pegleg to run on opensuse leap15 image https://review.openstack.org/639495 | 23:21 |
| openstackgerrit | Arun Kant proposed openstack/airship-pegleg master: Support pegleg to run on opensuse leap15 image https://review.openstack.org/639495 | 23:21 |
| *** bh526r has quit IRC | 23:50 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!