| *** roman_g has quit IRC | 00:01 | |
| *** michael-beaver has quit IRC | 00:08 | |
| *** aaronsheffield has quit IRC | 00:11 | |
| openstackgerrit | Ian Pittwood proposed airship/spyglass master: [WIP] Adds unit tests for Spyglass CLI https://review.opendev.org/663140 | 00:45 |
|---|---|---|
| *** kskels has quit IRC | 01:49 | |
| *** AlexNoskov has quit IRC | 02:11 | |
| *** cheng1 has quit IRC | 04:11 | |
| *** aojea has joined #airshipit | 06:23 | |
| *** pgaxatte has joined #airshipit | 06:29 | |
| *** jamesgu__ has quit IRC | 07:14 | |
| *** roman_g has joined #airshipit | 07:52 | |
| openstackgerrit | Kudaka Poorna Rajesh proposed airship/promenade master: Add liveness/readiness probes to calico-etcd https://review.opendev.org/659863 | 08:11 |
| *** happyhemant has joined #airshipit | 08:19 | |
| *** happyhemant has quit IRC | 10:38 | |
| *** bastianstola has joined #airshipit | 12:24 | |
| *** alexanderhughes has joined #airshipit | 12:43 | |
| *** aaronsheffield has joined #airshipit | 12:51 | |
| openstackgerrit | Merged airship/spyglass-plugin-xls master: Include examples in package https://review.opendev.org/663337 | 12:55 |
| openstackgerrit | Ian Pittwood proposed airship/spyglass master: Schema validation https://review.opendev.org/659172 | 12:56 |
| openstackgerrit | Ian Pittwood proposed airship/spyglass master: Manifest undefined data validation https://review.opendev.org/655683 | 12:57 |
| *** bastianstola has quit IRC | 13:00 | |
| *** bastianstola has joined #airshipit | 13:03 | |
| openstackgerrit | Matt McEuen proposed airship/promenade master: Change CoreDNS from Deployment to DaemonSet https://review.opendev.org/662448 | 13:11 |
| openstackgerrit | Matt McEuen proposed airship/promenade master: Change CoreDNS from Deployment to DaemonSet https://review.opendev.org/662448 | 13:15 |
| *** howell has joined #airshipit | 13:19 | |
| *** kranthikirang has joined #airshipit | 13:26 | |
| *** mloza has joined #airshipit | 13:29 | |
| openstackgerrit | Merged airship/pegleg master: Update tests dir to use yaml.safe_load() https://review.opendev.org/662769 | 13:29 |
| *** vladyslav has quit IRC | 13:30 | |
| *** kguttikonda has joined #airshipit | 13:30 | |
| *** kranthikirang has quit IRC | 13:34 | |
| *** aojea has quit IRC | 13:48 | |
| *** AOjeaGarcia has joined #airshipit | 13:48 | |
| *** kskels has joined #airshipit | 13:56 | |
| *** nishantkr has joined #airshipit | 14:00 | |
| *** jamesgu_ has joined #airshipit | 14:02 | |
| *** MattCoachCarter has joined #airshipit | 14:53 | |
| *** bastianstola has quit IRC | 15:07 | |
| openstackgerrit | Jiri Suchomel proposed airship/shipyard master: Get password for shipyard user for special variable if it exists https://review.opendev.org/663698 | 15:17 |
| mattmceuen | In case anyone didn't notice -- the airship-in-a-bottle project is renamed back: https://opendev.org/airship/airship-in-a-bottle | 15:21 |
| mattmceuen | (thanks openstack infra team!) | 15:21 |
| mattmceuen | The "in-a-bottle" project redirects | 15:21 |
| kguttikonda | @team, how can I communicate to drydock-api in UCP after having X-Auth-Token? | 15:31 |
| kguttikonda | what else I need to add in headers in order to get nodes ? | 15:31 |
| roman_g | https://review.opendev.org/#/c/661004/ - review, please | 15:31 |
| kguttikonda | documentation says: Secured endpoints require Keystone authentication and proper role assignment for authorization | 15:32 |
| kguttikonda | but no example; can someone help me here? | 15:32 |
| kskels | here is example from library that is used in our CICD - https://github.com/att-comdev/cicd/blob/master/vars/shipyard3.groovy | 15:33 |
| kskels | it's not super clear cut code but it does uses API of shipyard directly | 15:34 |
| kskels | it's generally a standard openstack flow - get keystone token and then pass it to shipyard API | 15:34 |
| roman_g | 'Content-Type': 'application/json', | 15:34 |
| roman_g | 'X-IDENTITY-STATUS': 'Confirmed', | 15:34 |
| roman_g | 'X-USER-NAME': 'Test', | 15:34 |
| roman_g | 'X-ROLES': 'admin' | 15:34 |
| roman_g | I'm not sure, it's just my guess. | 15:35 |
| roman_g | I've taken this headers from drydock tests | 15:35 |
| kguttikonda | so; we don't have to pass X-Auth-Token in headers? | 15:36 |
| kguttikonda | X-USER-NAME is drydock or Test? Sorry, I am confused | 15:36 |
| evgenyl | kguttikonda: You have to pass X-Auth-Token, because it uses a standard keystone middleware as far as I know. | 15:38 |
| evgenyl | kguttikonda: But first you will need to request a token from ucp Keystone. | 15:38 |
| kguttikonda | I did pass that and still getting { | 15:38 |
| kguttikonda | "message": "Unauthenticated", | 15:38 |
| kguttikonda | "type": "error", | 15:38 |
| kguttikonda | "retry": false | 15:38 |
| kguttikonda | } | 15:38 |
| evgenyl | kguttikonda: Are you sure that the token you requested is correct? It's the way cicd script you referenced above does it https://github.com/att-comdev/cicd/blob/master/vars/shipyard3.groovy#L65 | 15:40 |
| evgenyl | I'm not sure what is `X-Context-Marker` though. | 15:40 |
| *** pgaxatte has quit IRC | 15:41 | |
| kguttikonda | perhaps X-Context-Marker required for shipyard but I am trying to drydock-api here; | 15:41 |
| kguttikonda | Does it need something else? | 15:41 |
| evgenyl | kguttikonda: Oops, sorry, I thought you needed Shipyard api, and not drydock.. | 15:42 |
| kguttikonda | perfect; it works now; Apparently I am using wrong x-Auth-Token | 15:43 |
| kguttikonda | Sorry for that; my bad | 15:43 |
| kguttikonda | One of my compute node fails at MAAS deployment; Apparently network configured correctly; and it fails to download bootactions/units | 15:44 |
| kguttikonda | any idea where to check? Other computes are deployed and joined to k8s | 15:44 |
| kguttikonda | I am not sure what is wrong here; hence trying to explore drydock-api | 15:44 |
| kguttikonda | api/v1.0/bootactions/nodes/compute-5/units | 15:48 |
| evgenyl | kguttikonda: Can you tell us a bit more about the failure, where did it fail and can you share the error message? | 15:49 |
| kguttikonda | evgenyl: its basically MAAS deployment failure; | 15:51 |
| kguttikonda | When I check in console I see following | 15:51 |
| kguttikonda | wget -vvv --no-proxy --no-check-certificate --header=X-Bootaction-key: af96b250d0cbec284800fdb3457ba501e0747ac38ebaf8324ab5ca3db9fb9e66 https://drydock.ucp.svc.cluster.local:443/api/v1.0/bootactions/nodes/computer01o005/units | 15:51 |
| kguttikonda | it shows connected and after that nothing; drydock lists the node as failure | 15:52 |
| kguttikonda | we have double checked the networking and from PXE interface we can reach the drydock and its connecting but not sure why its not downloading | 15:53 |
| kguttikonda | bootdata | 15:55 |
| kguttikonda | The boot data API is used by deploying nodes to load the appropriate boot actions to be instantiated on the node. It uses alternative authentication and is not accessible with Keystone. | 15:55 |
| kguttikonda | so, bootdata api do not use keystone auth; what will it use? how can we get X-Bootaction-ke? | 15:55 |
| kguttikonda | evgenyl: where as other nodes are able to download units and continue to download files | 15:57 |
| evgenyl | kguttikonda: I would double-check the networking configuration in this case, check that the traffic from this node comes to the node with drydock-api (tcpdump), also check if drydock-api logs every request that comes to api and see if you can identify it. | 16:00 |
| kguttikonda | the node has only pxe interface; I thought by this time node should have bonding configured with OAM; | 16:01 |
| kguttikonda | I will deploy it once again and see if there is anything wrong with PCI bus and interface | 16:02 |
| kguttikonda | evgenyl: How can I do this? check if drydock-api logs every request that comes to api and see if you can identify it. | 16:02 |
| evgenyl | kguttikonda: you should be able to access the logs using something like`kubectl logs -f -n ucp drydock-api-UNIQUE-ID` | 16:04 |
| kguttikonda | evgenyl: Doesn't seems like it shows every transaction; I was already checking logs in both pods | 16:05 |
| kguttikonda | evgenyl: QQ: Can we use Airship to provision only kubernetes not OSH? | 16:19 |
| evgenyl | kguttikonda: You can, you will need to remove OSH chart group from your site definition, here is an example for airsloop site https://github.com/airshipit/treasuremap/blob/master/type/sloop/manifests/full-site.yaml#L40-L59 | 16:24 |
| kguttikonda | evgenyl: perfect; thank you | 16:24 |
| kguttikonda | also; we can avoid bonding in hardware profile and host profile? | 16:25 |
| evgenyl | kguttikonda: If your site is based on airship-seaworthy, you will need to add similar override as in airsloop, where you would remove unneeded charts. | 16:25 |
| kguttikonda | evgenyl: Got it | 16:25 |
| evgenyl | kguttikonda: I'm not a huge expert in drydock/maas, but I think whatever you can do in maas, you can do in airship. This would require to edit hw profiles not to configure bonding, and also go through configs and fix interfaces names. | 16:26 |
| kguttikonda | OK; make sense; thanks evgenyl | 16:26 |
| evgenyl | kguttikonda: You can refer to airsloop, which is as far as I can see requires only two interfaces, one pxe and another one for all other networks https://github.com/airshipit/treasuremap/blob/master/site/airsloop/profiles/host/compute.yaml#L25-L41 | 16:33 |
| kguttikonda | evgenyl: cool, this will help | 16:34 |
| kskels | exactly - airsloop has a config sample for drydock networks without the bond as well | 16:35 |
| kskels | https://github.com/airshipit/treasuremap/blob/master/site/airsloop/networks/physical/networks.yaml | 16:35 |
| kskels | is basically the same without using bond | 16:35 |
| kguttikonda | OK; can we use airsloop with more computes then? | 16:36 |
| kskels | so it really depends on your use ase | 16:36 |
| kguttikonda | ok | 16:36 |
| openstackgerrit | Alexander Hughes proposed airship/pegleg master: [DNM] Promenade genesis test https://review.opendev.org/663389 | 16:36 |
| kskels | if you want to have full production-like deployment with HA control plane | 16:36 |
| kskels | I would look into full airship-seaworthy | 16:36 |
| kguttikonda | basically; I have setup with number of servers but with 1 GB interfaces; | 16:36 |
| kskels | if you are more willing to setup a lab/demo environment that would still have all the features but less dependencies and reqs | 16:37 |
| kskels | than airsloop is great way | 16:37 |
| kskels | yes- it's very easy to add more compute nodes for airsloop | 16:37 |
| kguttikonda | oh Airsloop only have 1 controller; I get it | 16:37 |
| kskels | yes | 16:37 |
| kguttikonda | then probably I need a hybird of Airsloop with 3 controller (Airship) | 16:37 |
| kskels | yes - that's a good way to look at it | 16:38 |
| kskels | I would base your things on airship-seaworthy | 16:38 |
| kguttikonda | going to be an interesting work | 16:38 |
| kskels | but then mix and match some simplifications from airsloop | 16:38 |
| kguttikonda | I agree | 16:38 |
| kskels | another area will be disks | 16:38 |
| kskels | airsloop is configured to work "out of the box" with 1 disk only | 16:38 |
| kskels | where else virrtual-seaworthy has nuymber of dedicated disks for ceph, etc | 16:38 |
| openstackgerrit | Ian Pittwood proposed airship/spyglass master: [WIP] Adds unit tests for Spyglass CLI https://review.opendev.org/663140 | 16:39 |
| kskels | in some ways - I would probably suggest to use airsloop as a start to get familiar with things | 16:39 |
| kskels | and then move on to full HA | 16:39 |
| kskels | but def up to you and your use case | 16:39 |
| openstackgerrit | Alexander Hughes proposed airship/pegleg master: [DNM] Promenade genesis test https://review.opendev.org/663389 | 16:40 |
| kskels | (e.g. airsloop was created for folks to have something more simple to get started) | 16:40 |
| kskels | QQ: Can we use Airship to provision only kubernetes not OSH? - seeing your question before | 16:42 |
| kskels | in this case probably nice to have k8s HA, etc | 16:42 |
| kskels | so yeah - have fun! | 16:42 |
| openstackgerrit | Alexander Hughes proposed airship/pegleg master: Pegleg dependency uplift https://review.opendev.org/663101 | 16:44 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged airship/spyglass master: Schema validation https://review.opendev.org/659172 | 16:45 |
| openstackgerrit | Alexander Hughes proposed airship/pegleg master: [DNM] Promenade genesis test https://review.opendev.org/663389 | 16:45 |
| kguttikonda | thanks kskels | 16:52 |
| openstackgerrit | Kaspars Skels proposed airship/treasuremap master: Airsloop pipeline fixes https://review.opendev.org/663457 | 16:53 |
| kguttikonda | evgenyl: This time I did using update_site.sh script and the same compute node is able to download both units, files and completed deployment; Apparently there were no changes made to either network or node; This is crazy | 16:54 |
| *** mrhillsman is now known as openlab | 17:02 | |
| *** openlab is now known as codebauss | 17:05 | |
| kguttikonda | 2019-06-06 17:08:29.273 8 INFO armada.api.middleware [-] POST http://armada-api.ucp.svc.cluster.local:8000/api/v1.0/apply?target_manifest=full-site&tiller_port=44134&tiller_host=10.97.181.254 - 409 Conflict | 17:10 |
| kguttikonda | 2019-06-06 17:08:29.273 8 DEBUG armada.api.middleware [-] Response body:{"message": "Unable to acquire lock before timeout", "type": "error", "retry": false} process_response ./armada/api/middleware.py:141 | 17:10 |
| kguttikonda | Any suggestions ? | 17:10 |
| openstackgerrit | Ian Pittwood proposed airship/spyglass master: Manifest undefined data validation https://review.opendev.org/655683 | 17:12 |
| *** codebauss is now known as openlab | 17:13 | |
| *** openlab is now known as codebauss | 17:14 | |
| *** codebauss is now known as openlab | 17:15 | |
| evgenyl | kguttikonda: It may happen because you already have armada apply running somewhere. | 17:15 |
| *** openlab is now known as codebauss | 17:16 | |
| kguttikonda | evgenyl: last time when I ran deploy_site and I have stopped it using shipyard CLI | 17:16 |
| evgenyl | kguttikonda: You can also try running something like `kubectl get locks --all-namespaces` and see if there is armada lock object, after that you can run describe to see what is the timestamp. | 17:16 |
| evgenyl | kguttikonda: Oh, this must be it, I'm not sure if armada-api supports "stop". | 17:17 |
| evgenyl | So Shipyard API/AIrflow may have stopped, but Armada API may continue running the apply. | 17:17 |
| kguttikonda | yeah, it was 2 hours back | 17:18 |
| kguttikonda | API Version: armada.process/v1 | 17:18 |
| kguttikonda | Data: | 17:18 |
| kguttikonda | Last Updated: 2019-06-06T17:16:52Z | 17:18 |
| kguttikonda | Kind: Resource | 17:18 |
| kguttikonda | Metadata: | 17:18 |
| kguttikonda | Creation Timestamp: 2019-06-06T15:51:46Z | 17:18 |
| kguttikonda | Generation: 1 | 17:18 |
| kguttikonda | Resource Version: 370337 | 17:18 |
| kguttikonda | Self Link: /apis/armada.process/v1/namespaces/kube-system/locks/locks.armada.process.lock | 17:18 |
| kguttikonda | UID: fce9d2f9-8872-11e9-b4f3-e4434b083126 | 17:18 |
| kguttikonda | Events: <none> | 17:18 |
| kguttikonda | what should I do now? | 17:18 |
| kguttikonda | Shall I delete the lock in kube-system? | 17:18 |
| evgenyl | kguttikonda: Can you check logs for both armada-api logs and see if any of those runs the deployment? | 17:18 |
| kguttikonda | update_site has been failed; but all nodes were deployed; So can I use just update_software.sh | 17:19 |
| evgenyl | kguttikonda: You can delete it, but make sure that it is not being run by some of armada pods. | 17:19 |
| kguttikonda | I see armada-api logs nothing; | 17:19 |
| evgenyl | kguttikonda: You can delete the lock and restart, if you are certain that none of armada instances runs the deployment. | 17:20 |
| evgenyl | kguttikonda: You can run update software if you don't need to provision new nodes. | 17:20 |
| kguttikonda | ok | 17:20 |
| kguttikonda | yeah, in both armada-api pods I see no logs | 17:20 |
| kguttikonda | In armada-api I see following | 17:21 |
| kguttikonda | 2019-06-06 17:20:52.851 10 DEBUG armada.handlers.lock [-] Updating lock update_lock ./armada/handlers/lock.py:155 | 17:21 |
| kguttikonda | 2019-06-06 17:16:52.566 10 DEBUG armada.handlers.lock [-] Updating lock update_lock ./armada/handlers/lock.py:155 | 17:21 |
| kguttikonda | 2019-06-06 17:17:52.636 10 DEBUG armada.handlers.lock [-] Updating lock update_lock ./armada/handlers/lock.py:155 | 17:21 |
| kguttikonda | 2019-06-06 17:18:52.707 10 DEBUG armada.handlers.lock [-] Updating lock update_lock ./armada/handlers/lock.py:155 | 17:21 |
| kguttikonda | 2019-06-06 17:19:52.782 10 DEBUG armada.handlers.lock [-] Updating lock update_lock ./armada/handlers/lock.py:155 | 17:21 |
| evgenyl | kguttikonda: Oh, it means it still runs it. | 17:21 |
| evgenyl | kguttikonda: It probably wait for some resource to be deployed. | 17:22 |
| evgenyl | Maybe there is some job/pod that is not ready. | 17:22 |
| kguttikonda | not sure what exactly its trying to deploy | 17:22 |
| *** chinna has quit IRC | 17:22 | |
| evgenyl | kguttikonda: If you scroll up the log, you should be able to see what was the last thing it applied. | 17:22 |
| openstackgerrit | Ian Pittwood proposed airship/spyglass master: Add tests into Zuul config and Makefile https://review.opendev.org/663729 | 17:23 |
| *** codebauss is now known as mrhillsman | 17:24 | |
| openstackgerrit | Ian Pittwood proposed airship/spyglass master: Add tests into Zuul config and Makefile https://review.opendev.org/663729 | 17:24 |
| openstackgerrit | Ian Pittwood proposed airship/spyglass master: Add tests into Zuul config and Makefile https://review.opendev.org/663729 | 17:25 |
| kguttikonda | evgenyl: i see it does ceph-rbd-pool | 17:27 |
| kguttikonda | 2019-06-06 15:53:11.861 10 DEBUG armada.handlers.wait [-] Resource ceph-rbd-pool is ready! handle_resource ./armada/handlers/wait.py:182 | 17:27 |
| kguttikonda | but I can see all pods are running fine in tenant-ceph | 17:27 |
| evgenyl | Can you check that all jobs finished the execution? You can also run `helm list -a` to see if there are any non-deployed charts. | 17:28 |
| evgenyl | kguttikonda: first can be checked by running `kubectl get jobs --all-namespaces` | 17:28 |
| evgenyl | There should be some kind of "success counters" in the columns. | 17:29 |
| kguttikonda | I see one of ceph-mon in tenant-ceph is being restarted | 17:29 |
| kguttikonda | that's the problem | 17:29 |
| openstackgerrit | Stas Egorov proposed airship/promenade master: New source for hyperkube binary definition https://review.opendev.org/657953 | 17:30 |
| *** mnaser has left #airshipit | 17:34 | |
| kguttikonda | evgenyl: jobs are fine; I had the delete the ceph-mon data in one controller node and now ceph-mon pods are running and active; However no success in Armada-api | 17:35 |
| kskels | the armada takes a while to fail | 17:37 |
| kskels | so likely existing shipyard command is still running - you can see it by checking get actions from shipyard CLI | 17:37 |
| kskels | there is no really good way to abort ongoing action - so you just need to wait out | 17:37 |
| kskels | once it's completed/timedout - you should be able to run update_site - e.g. armada will be able to aquire lock | 17:38 |
| kskels | in other words - another run of armada is likely happening that is blocking your new task | 17:38 |
| kguttikonda | kskels: there is no shipyard action running for sure; But stopping shipyard action doesn't seem to stop armada once it handover | 17:42 |
| kguttikonda | I just did ceph reweight OSDs and now armada moved on | 17:43 |
| kguttikonda | :) | 17:43 |
| kskels | yes - armada will re-try | 17:43 |
| kskels | so as long as you push in new docs - next re-try will take the new set | 17:43 |
| kskels | right | 17:43 |
| kskels | stopping action would not stop armada | 17:43 |
| kskels | you still need to wait for it to time-out | 17:44 |
| kguttikonda | ok | 17:44 |
| openstackgerrit | Alexander Hughes proposed airship/pegleg master: [WIP] Update dockerfiles to include ssh client https://review.opendev.org/663732 | 17:46 |
| openstackgerrit | Ian Pittwood proposed airship/spyglass master: Add tests into Zuul config and Makefile https://review.opendev.org/663729 | 17:53 |
| openstackgerrit | Alexander Hughes proposed airship/pegleg master: Pegleg dependency uplift https://review.opendev.org/663101 | 17:54 |
| openstackgerrit | Alexander Hughes proposed airship/pegleg master: [WIP] Update dockerfiles to include ssh client https://review.opendev.org/663732 | 17:54 |
| openstackgerrit | Ian Pittwood proposed airship/spyglass master: Add tests into Zuul config and Makefile https://review.opendev.org/663729 | 17:54 |
| openstackgerrit | Alexander Hughes proposed airship/pegleg master: [DNM] Promenade genesis test https://review.opendev.org/663389 | 17:54 |
| alexanderhughes | good lord with my proposals. wonder if we should edit the notifications to not include WIP or DNM patchsets | 17:57 |
| *** michael-beaver has joined #airshipit | 18:02 | |
| *** roman_g has quit IRC | 18:04 | |
| openstackgerrit | Merged airship/promenade master: New source for hyperkube binary definition https://review.opendev.org/657953 | 18:05 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged airship/airship-in-a-bottle master: Support for new hyperkube source in promenade https://review.opendev.org/657954 | 18:09 |
| dwalt | alexanderhughes: I think we can only filter events | 18:10 |
| dwalt | i.e. change merged, patchset created | 18:10 |
| *** AlexNoskov has joined #airshipit | 18:11 | |
| alexanderhughes | yeah I don't think it's a huge deal in the grand scheme of things, just noticed it and was a bit amused | 18:11 |
| openstackgerrit | Ian Pittwood proposed airship/spyglass master: Adds unit tests for Spyglass CLI https://review.opendev.org/663140 | 18:48 |
| *** kguttikonda has quit IRC | 18:51 | |
| *** AOjeaGarcia has quit IRC | 19:03 | |
| openstackgerrit | Alexander Hughes proposed airship/pegleg master: [WIP] Update dockerfiles to include ssh client https://review.opendev.org/663732 | 19:15 |
| openstackgerrit | Ian Pittwood proposed airship/spyglass master: Adds unit tests for Spyglass CLI https://review.opendev.org/663140 | 19:22 |
| alexanderhughes | can I get a core to review https://review.opendev.org/#/c/645017/ please? Lev left so I took over his changes. not comfortable with +2ing something I was the last person making changes to | 19:34 |
| openstackgerrit | Michael Beaver proposed airship/shipyard master: [WIP] Add override-checkout to OSH-infra https://review.opendev.org/662284 | 19:43 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged airship/promenade master: templates: separate genesis and join sources https://review.opendev.org/658421 | 19:56 |
| openstackgerrit | Michael Beaver proposed airship/shipyard master: [WIP] Add override-checkout to OSH-infra https://review.opendev.org/662284 | 20:09 |
| *** kranthikirang has joined #airshipit | 20:11 | |
| openstackgerrit | Rahul Khiyani proposed airship/promenade master: [WIP]ETCD: Add pod/container security context https://review.opendev.org/662334 | 20:18 |
| openstackgerrit | Alexander Hughes proposed airship/pegleg master: [WIP] Update dockerfiles to include ssh client https://review.opendev.org/663732 | 20:20 |
| openstackgerrit | Alexander Hughes proposed airship/pegleg master: [WIP] Update dockerfiles to include ssh client https://review.opendev.org/663732 | 20:20 |
| openstackgerrit | Evgeniy L proposed airship/treasuremap master: Uplift nfs-provisioner https://review.opendev.org/662583 | 20:33 |
| openstackgerrit | Alexander Hughes proposed airship/pegleg master: [WIP] Update dockerfiles to include ssh client https://review.opendev.org/663732 | 20:41 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged airship/spyglass-plugin-xls master: Adds Safety dependency vulnerability checks https://review.opendev.org/662039 | 20:55 |
| *** henriqueof has joined #airshipit | 20:58 | |
| hogepodge | mattmceuen: did we move the sync meeting? On the etherpad it said Friday but my invitation still says Thursday | 20:59 |
| *** MattCoachCarter has quit IRC | 21:00 | |
| openstackgerrit | Alexander Hughes proposed airship/pegleg master: Update dockerfiles to include ssh client https://review.opendev.org/663732 | 21:16 |
| openstackgerrit | Ian Pittwood proposed airship/spyglass-plugin-xls master: [WIP] Add unit tests for xls plugin CLI https://review.opendev.org/663142 | 21:17 |
| openstackgerrit | Alexander Hughes proposed airship/pegleg master: [WIP] Site and global secret decrypt. https://review.opendev.org/662847 | 21:17 |
| *** KeithMnemonic has joined #airshipit | 21:17 | |
| openstackgerrit | Merged airship/pegleg master: Adds Safety dependency vulnerability checks https://review.opendev.org/662812 | 21:19 |
| *** kranthikirang has quit IRC | 21:19 | |
| openstackgerrit | Ian Pittwood proposed airship/spyglass-plugin-xls master: Updates YAPF settings to match Spyglass https://review.opendev.org/662020 | 21:23 |
| *** howell has quit IRC | 21:26 | |
| *** alexanderhughes has quit IRC | 21:43 | |
| openstackgerrit | Dan Crank proposed airship/promenade master: [WIP] Fixes to etcd backup script https://review.opendev.org/663785 | 22:19 |
| openstackgerrit | Alexander Noskov proposed airship/treasuremap master: Uplift all components except Armada https://review.opendev.org/662085 | 22:27 |
| openstackgerrit | Alexander Noskov proposed airship/treasuremap master: Uplift all components except Armada https://review.opendev.org/662085 | 23:31 |
| *** nishantkr has quit IRC | 23:45 | |
| *** aaronsheffield has quit IRC | 23:51 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!