| openstackgerrit | Prateek Dodda proposed airship/treasuremap master: Integrate openstack utility container in airship/treasuremap https://review.opendev.org/691731 | 00:05 |
|---|---|---|
| *** nishantkr has quit IRC | 00:11 | |
| *** jamesgu has quit IRC | 00:26 | |
| *** AlexNoskov has quit IRC | 01:35 | |
| *** dpawlik has joined #airshipit | 01:40 | |
| *** dpawlik has quit IRC | 01:45 | |
| *** segorov has joined #airshipit | 01:49 | |
| *** jamesgu has joined #airshipit | 01:58 | |
| *** SRao has joined #airshipit | 01:58 | |
| *** jamesgu has quit IRC | 02:04 | |
| *** jamesgu has joined #airshipit | 02:44 | |
| openstackgerrit | Kaspars Skels proposed airship/treasuremap master: Add image overrides for all the charts https://review.opendev.org/691042 | 03:14 |
| openstackgerrit | Phil Sphicas proposed airship/porthole master: Add xenial-based calicoctl-utility containers https://review.opendev.org/691497 | 05:05 |
| openstackgerrit | Prateek Dodda proposed airship/treasuremap master: Integrate openstack utility container in airship/treasuremap https://review.opendev.org/691731 | 05:13 |
| openstackgerrit | Prateek Dodda proposed airship/treasuremap master: Integrate openstack utility container in airship/treasuremap https://review.opendev.org/691731 | 05:16 |
| *** kevinz has joined #airshipit | 05:58 | |
| *** kevinz has quit IRC | 05:58 | |
| openstackgerrit | Rahul Khiyani proposed airship/treasuremap master: Integrate ceph utility container in airship/treasuremap https://review.opendev.org/681135 | 05:59 |
| openstackgerrit | Rahul Khiyani proposed airship/treasuremap master: Integrate ceph utility container in airship/treasuremap https://review.opendev.org/681135 | 06:01 |
| *** jamesgu has quit IRC | 06:04 | |
| *** dpawlik has joined #airshipit | 06:30 | |
| *** st4nson_ has joined #airshipit | 07:43 | |
| *** kskels has quit IRC | 07:47 | |
| *** pgaxatte has joined #airshipit | 07:52 | |
| *** JaredSchooley has quit IRC | 07:56 | |
| *** JaredSchooley has joined #airshipit | 07:58 | |
| st4nson_ | Hi all, got a quick question. Will armada be a default way to deploy OpenStack components in airship 2.0 ? | 08:04 |
| *** JaredSchooley has quit IRC | 08:49 | |
| *** JaredSchooley has joined #airshipit | 08:50 | |
| openstackgerrit | Smruti Soumitra Khuntia proposed airship/treasuremap master: Disable TaintBasedEviction feature gate for kubernetes-apiserver https://review.opendev.org/688863 | 09:50 |
| openstackgerrit | Dmitry Ukov proposed airship/airshipctl master: [AIR-137] Add logic to isogen subcommand https://review.opendev.org/675851 | 09:55 |
| openstackgerrit | Dmitry Ukov proposed airship/airshipctl master: [AIR-145] Generate cloud init settings https://review.opendev.org/679563 | 09:55 |
| openstackgerrit | Dmitry Ukov proposed airship/airshipctl master: [AIR-137] Add ISO builder artifacts check https://review.opendev.org/688369 | 09:55 |
| *** JaredSchooley has quit IRC | 10:31 | |
| *** JaredSchooley has joined #airshipit | 10:33 | |
| *** JaredSchooley has quit IRC | 10:55 | |
| *** JaredSchooley has joined #airshipit | 10:56 | |
| *** ianychoi__ is now known as ianychoi | 11:24 | |
| *** pgaxatte has quit IRC | 11:38 | |
| openstackgerrit | Doug Aaser proposed airship/promenade master: Migrate config to KubeletConfiguration https://review.opendev.org/687927 | 11:47 |
| openstackgerrit | kanwar saad bin liaqat proposed airship/airshipctl master: Bootstrap redfish Remote direct https://review.opendev.org/683165 | 12:21 |
| *** alexanderhughes has joined #airshipit | 12:23 | |
| *** dpawlik has quit IRC | 12:27 | |
| *** bh526r has joined #airshipit | 12:50 | |
| *** dpawlik has joined #airshipit | 13:04 | |
| *** kskels has joined #airshipit | 13:20 | |
| openstackgerrit | Steve Wilkerson proposed airship/airshipctl master: Update references to 'kubernetes' to proper name https://review.opendev.org/691860 | 13:31 |
| *** michael-beaver has joined #airshipit | 13:35 | |
| *** ab2434_ has joined #airshipit | 13:36 | |
| mattmceuen | hey st4nson_ -- definitely -- from a workload perspective (e.g. OpenStack-Helm) there are aren't big changes with Airship 2.0. They'll still be helm charts, and Armada will deploy those helm charts. There may be some changes to exactly how Armada does that (e.g. leveraging Argo workflows to handle parallelism, sequencing, etc) but that will be an evolution of Armada rather than a different approach | 13:36 |
| *** dukov has joined #airshipit | 13:36 | |
| mattmceuen | @seaneagan was planning on leading some discussion around Armada plans for Airship 2.0 in this Thursday's Airship design call, if you'd like to join! | 13:41 |
| *** pgaxatte has joined #airshipit | 13:47 | |
| *** LoicL35 has joined #airshipit | 13:48 | |
| *** ian-pittwood has joined #airshipit | 13:49 | |
| mattmceuen | our team meeting is in 10 minutes -- please add anything to the agenda that you'd like to discuss today: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/airship-meeting-2019-10-29 | 13:50 |
| *** shubham_kaushal has joined #airshipit | 13:54 | |
| *** nishantkr has joined #airshipit | 13:56 | |
| openstackgerrit | Ian Howell proposed airship/airshipctl master: This updates the current unit tests for testify https://review.opendev.org/689051 | 13:58 |
| *** pramchan has joined #airshipit | 13:59 | |
| mattmceuen | #startmeeting airship | 14:00 |
| openstack | Meeting started Tue Oct 29 14:00:26 2019 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is mattmceuen. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 14:00 |
| openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 14:00 |
| *** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: airship)" | 14:00 | |
| openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'airship' | 14:00 |
| mattmceuen | #topic Rollcall | 14:00 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Rollcall (Meeting topic: airship)" | 14:00 | |
| dwalt | o/ | 14:00 |
| michael-beaver | o/ | 14:00 |
| pramchan | o/ | 14:00 |
| mattmceuen | https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/airship-meeting-2019-10-29 | 14:00 |
| alexanderhughes | o/ | 14:01 |
| mattmceuen | please add anything to discuss to today's agenda^ -- we'll give it a minute or two | 14:01 |
| *** roman_g has joined #airshipit | 14:01 | |
| * ildikov is lurking | 14:01 | |
| nishantkr | o/ | 14:01 |
| roman_g | o/ | 14:01 |
| ian-pittwood | o/ | 14:01 |
| kskels | o/ | 14:02 |
| seaneagan | o/ | 14:02 |
| mattmceuen | ok let's get started | 14:02 |
| mattmceuen | #topic Enforcement of 2x CR +2 before allowing WF +1 | 14:02 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Enforcement of 2x CR +2 before allowing WF +1 (Meeting topic: airship)" | 14:02 | |
| mattmceuen | roman_g - this one's yours, take it away | 14:02 |
| dukov | o/ | 14:02 |
| mattmceuen | GM / GE all :) | 14:03 |
| roman_g | Ah. | 14:03 |
| pramchan | Is anyone reviewing https://review.opendev.org/#/c/683165/27 to give +2 for this ? | 14:03 |
| roman_g | Yes. So it's all written in etherpad. | 14:03 |
| pramchan | thamks | 14:04 |
| mattmceuen | pramchan: want to add that one to the Review Request part of the agenda | 14:04 |
| roman_g | Do we want to enforce rule of 2x WF+2 from cores? | 14:04 |
| mattmceuen | I have an opinion on this | 14:04 |
| mattmceuen | I prefer documenting and communicating our convention about 2x WF+2 | 14:04 |
| kskels | I kind a feel that our current ways of working with "soft" enforcement/awareness has been working great | 14:05 |
| mattmceuen | We haven't done a good job of documenting core responsibilities / role in general, so far we have mostly relied on "do it like openstack does it" | 14:05 |
| roman_g | We have had changes being merged without this rule followed. | 14:05 |
| mattmceuen | If we do a good job of documenting/communicating/following our "convention", then the ability to 1x WF+2 a patch -- in case of some emergency -- will come in handy occasionally | 14:05 |
| mattmceuen | Agree roman_g | 14:06 |
| pramchan | what does 2x WF_2 mean , you mean two 2_ fro code review for approval? | 14:06 |
| *** shubham_kaushal_ has joined #airshipit | 14:06 | |
| mattmceuen | I followed up on that, and it was due to miscommunication / misunderstanding | 14:06 |
| roman_g | pramchan yes, that's what I mean | 14:06 |
| pramchan | ok thanks | 14:06 |
| mattmceuen | Except in one case -- me :) -- where I fully documented they "why" of a single-+2 in the patchset | 14:06 |
| ian-pittwood | Do we check if they're non-author +2's already as well? | 14:06 |
| mattmceuen | That's definitely a convention ian-pittwood, I don't think it's enforced programmatically | 14:07 |
| mattmceuen | afaik | 14:07 |
| alexanderhughes | it's not but I think it's a convention that gets bent from time to time. especially on projects with low activity like spyglass/pegleg | 14:07 |
| alexanderhughes | with only a handful of cores, when the stars align and 2 of them are out for a day a patchset just isn't going to move | 14:08 |
| ian-pittwood | Yeah I know that | 14:08 |
| ian-pittwood | I just don't like that we can or have to approve our own material | 14:08 |
| mattmceuen | I definitely think that, if we document a convention and allow "break glass in case of emergency" exception to that rule, it should be required that the reviewer add in strong justification into the patchset | 14:08 |
| alexanderhughes | +1 | 14:08 |
| portdirect | ++ | 14:08 |
| mattmceuen | and that if the justification is missing, or anyone disagrees with it, we discuss it in the open | 14:08 |
| ian-pittwood | Sure, that works | 14:09 |
| portdirect | This is the way every openstack project has done it | 14:09 |
| mattmceuen | roman_g: do you think that is sufficient? | 14:09 |
| ian-pittwood | WF seems like it should definitely be non-author though | 14:09 |
| portdirect | Wf with two plus two's can be author | 14:09 |
| roman_g | OK. So we leave it as-is, and teach those who break rules w/o reason | 14:09 |
| roman_g | mattmceuen, yes, sufficient | 14:09 |
| mattmceuen | Yes. dukov shared the openstack-ansible core guidelines as a good example, I think we could start with those and enhance a bit -- dukov, can you please share them here? | 14:10 |
| howell | this is probably not doable, but can Zuul post customized comments in response to things like this? | 14:10 |
| mattmceuen | that's beyond my zuul brainpower howell :D good question | 14:10 |
| portdirect | If we need to correct Elmore than once, we should ask if that person should be a core roman_g | 14:10 |
| roman_g | howell Zuul? Which comments? | 14:10 |
| portdirect | Elmore/more | 14:11 |
| roman_g | portdirect yes, I think it wan not once | 14:11 |
| *** jamesgu has joined #airshipit | 14:11 | |
| mattmceuen | +1 portdirect. Cores must live with the consequences of their actions and take it seriously. | 14:11 |
| portdirect | Precisely | 14:11 |
| roman_g | *it was not once | 14:11 |
| kskels | +1 | 14:11 |
| kskels | (also good to hear from you Pete!) | 14:12 |
| * portdirect waves at kskels | 14:12 | |
| mattmceuen | Alright, I think we have a consensus, speak now or forever hold your peace if not :) | 14:12 |
| mattmceuen | Just two final thoughts from me: | 14:12 |
| mattmceuen | Just to be clear: the norm, 99.99% of the time is, two non-author +2's and a WF is required to merge a patchset | 14:13 |
| mattmceuen | And, we need to document some core reviewer guidelines very soon | 14:13 |
| michael-beaver | +1, I definitely agree with the informal 2x +2, especially if we document it | 14:13 |
| mattmceuen | thank you for bringing this up roman_g | 14:14 |
| kskels | can a WF be done by the author? | 14:14 |
| kskels | and only 2x +2 is needed? | 14:14 |
| portdirect | In openstack, yes | 14:14 |
| mattmceuen | I think that makes sense as well | 14:14 |
| portdirect | I'd advise that path here | 14:14 |
| portdirect | (Again ref cores responsibility) | 14:14 |
| *** sreejithp has joined #airshipit | 14:15 | |
| mattmceuen | ok - moving on! | 14:15 |
| mattmceuen | #topic Collaboration between Edge Working Group and Airship at Ussuri PTG or KubeCon | 14:16 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Collaboration between Edge Working Group and Airship at Ussuri PTG or KubeCon (Meeting topic: airship)" | 14:16 | |
| mattmceuen | dwalt this one is yours I believe | 14:16 |
| dwalt | o/ ildikov! | 14:16 |
| ildikov | the OpenStack Project Team Guide has a chapter on reviewing as well: https://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/review-the-openstack-way.html | 14:16 |
| ildikov | sorry, just jumped off of my other meeting :) | 14:16 |
| ildikov | hi :) | 14:16 |
| dwalt | no worries :) | 14:16 |
| dwalt | floor is yours, if you'd like to speak | 14:17 |
| ildikov | so the OSF Edge Computing Group is having a full day on Friday at the PTG and we are looking into cross-project sessions | 14:17 |
| *** SRao has quit IRC | 14:18 | |
| ildikov | we have a few projects identified that people see relevant or are interested in, etc and Airship is one of these | 14:18 |
| mattmceuen | oh awesome | 14:18 |
| ildikov | I know that edge is not the primary target for the project, but it's still a relevant area so I wanted to ask if people who will be in Shanghai from the team would be interested in joint dicussions? | 14:18 |
| * mattmceuen thanks for sharing the openstack review guide as well ildikov :) | 14:18 | |
| pramchan | We have our PTG sessions for Airship on Thu + Friday, will see how we can co-ordinate | 14:18 |
| ildikov | this is our PTG etherpad: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PVG-ECG-PTG | 14:19 |
| dukov | mattmceuen: https://docs.openstack.org/openstack-ansible/latest/contributor/core-reviewers.html | 14:19 |
| ildikov | a bit more chaotic than I would prefer, but cross-project sessions are harder to schedule :) | 14:19 |
| pramchan | May be one of us can visit and speak on Airship as how it can be relevant to edge | 14:19 |
| ildikov | mattmceuen: np :) | 14:19 |
| pramchan | Same way you can come to Airship and speak how Aieship is relevant to edge | 14:20 |
| mattmceuen | yeah agree w/ pramchan -- if one of our Airship cores who is present at the PTG can peel off to meet with the edge group (looks like it might be Friday afternoonish) that would be valuable | 14:20 |
| ildikov | I'm more on the side at this point that it comes up in discussions or people ask what's the difference between Airship and StarlingX, etc | 14:20 |
| ildikov | so I think it would be great to share some thoughts about it | 14:21 |
| ildikov | Friday afternoon should work | 14:21 |
| mattmceuen | For sure. Would you be able to come fetch someone from the AIrship PTG room when it's about time for that? | 14:21 |
| pramchan | OK let me add my 15 minutes pitch on Friday to edge etherpad | 14:21 |
| mattmceuen | The same folks will also be leading the PTG so I think someone would just step out to join the edge session, if that's possible | 14:22 |
| ildikov | mattmceuen: I can pop by after lunch to coordinate. Would that work? | 14:22 |
| pramchan | sure | 14:23 |
| pramchan | matt let's do that | 14:23 |
| mattmceuen | ildikov: that's perfect | 14:23 |
| mattmceuen | thanks for making the connection | 14:23 |
| ildikov | I will also be in San Diego for KubeCon and some of the working group members will also, so we could target your gathering there as well, but I know it's limited time and space so I thought the PTG in Shanghai might be better | 14:24 |
| ildikov | mattmceuen: awesome, we have a plan! :) | 14:24 |
| ildikov | sure, looking forward to our chats and working together | 14:24 |
| mattmceuen | yeah, I think that makes sense. At KubeCon we're planning on "continuing" any needed discussions as well, so that's definitely an option for the Edge+Airship type discussion too | 14:24 |
| ildikov | cool, I'll keep that in mind and share with the group | 14:25 |
| mattmceuen | +1 | 14:25 |
| pramchan | Sure you are welcome to both and matt & me appear to be at both places for co-ordination | 14:25 |
| mattmceuen | ty | 14:25 |
| pramchan | +1 | 14:25 |
| mattmceuen | ok! moving on: | 14:25 |
| mattmceuen | #topic Image overrides in versions.yaml | 14:25 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Image overrides in versions.yaml (Meeting topic: airship)" | 14:25 | |
| shubham_kaushal | +1 | 14:25 |
| mattmceuen | howell, I think this one is yours, if I am properly distinguishing the shades of lavender in the etherpad :) | 14:26 |
| mattmceuen | or kaspars? | 14:26 |
| kskels | It's me! :) | 14:26 |
| mattmceuen | lol | 14:26 |
| openstackgerrit | Sean Eagan proposed airship/promenade master: Dynamic kubelet config support https://review.opendev.org/691867 | 14:26 |
| mattmceuen | https://review.opendev.org/#/c/691042/ | 14:27 |
| mattmceuen | all yours kskels | 14:27 |
| kskels | Hi everyone! I was the person once back removing image overrides in the `versions.yaml` to stick with defaults but lately due to various issues in the gating and image pulling speeds it's increasingly difficult to keep the pipelines stable, and while putting back versions adds extra work on syncing images with charts (potential improvements in the `updater.py`) ehre are the follwoing benefits | 14:27 |
| kskels | 1) It is now fully capturing all the images and versions of airship in a single file that are now possible to override by internal mirrors/repos | 14:27 |
| kskels | 2) this allows overrides for environments that doesn't have access to direct internet/proxy | 14:28 |
| kskels | I think I had a few more benefits that I forgot now! :) | 14:28 |
| mattmceuen | if we went that way, kaspars, would we also modify the image uplift script to take all those images into account? | 14:29 |
| pramchan | Is this for Ariship 1.x? | 14:29 |
| mattmceuen | yep | 14:29 |
| kskels | yes, for airship 1 | 14:29 |
| roman_g | 3) people don't get surprised to see way more images and applications being running, than the number of images listed in versions.yaml | 14:29 |
| kskels | we should.. I may not have time to do it before summit but something to put on the list for todo | 14:30 |
| mattmceuen | Agree, time is short before the summit -- it will be a good enhancement but not "urgent" | 14:30 |
| mattmceuen | I think that change makes sense Kaspars | 14:30 |
| mattmceuen | treasuremap has evolved from a "bare bones reference" toward "real world reference" anyway | 14:31 |
| kskels | yes, that is very much more and more true! | 14:31 |
| mattmceuen | Ok, unless there's anything else on this one, we can move on | 14:32 |
| kskels | thank you! | 14:32 |
| mattmceuen | #topic Docker image users | 14:32 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Docker image users (Meeting topic: airship)" | 14:32 | |
| ian-pittwood | This is me | 14:33 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged airship/porthole master: Pass extra build args to Docker image builds https://review.opendev.org/691496 | 14:33 |
| ian-pittwood | Sorry, kind of last minute thing for me. So currently some of our docker images for each project specify a user and some don't. For instance, promenade specifies "USER promenade" and pegleg does not specify a user at all. This is causing interoperability issues since pegleg is running and root and creating files that the promenade user does not have permissions to. | 14:34 |
| ian-pittwood | So I wanted to ask everyone what their opinion would be on creating a common user such as "airship" or using root throughout every image? | 14:34 |
| ian-pittwood | I'm not sure what the current justifications are for specifying a user on each project vs using root | 14:35 |
| kskels | I've had issues with this in the deployment and had to do workarounds for this exact reason - I would also be for having a common user | 14:35 |
| ian-pittwood | Examples: | 14:35 |
| ian-pittwood | https://opendev.org/airship/promenade/src/branch/master/Dockerfile | 14:35 |
| ian-pittwood | https://opendev.org/airship/pegleg/src/branch/master/images/pegleg/Dockerfile.ubuntu_xenial | 14:35 |
| mattmceuen | I think pegleg is probably the exception to the rule (whatever the rule should be) since it outputs files for other things to consume | 14:36 |
| alexanderhughes | not necessarily | 14:36 |
| alexanderhughes | if we do common user "airship" in all projects | 14:36 |
| alexanderhughes | we don't have to run anything as root and still avoid permissions issues between projects | 14:36 |
| *** LoicL35 has quit IRC | 14:36 | |
| alexanderhughes | also gets rid of workarounds like generating files with pegleg then having to chown to promenade to consume | 14:37 |
| mattmceuen | I think making an assumption of coordination of users -- i.e. that users are the same between containers -- introduces a level of coupling we may not need to have | 14:37 |
| ian-pittwood | I think that the "airship" user would be a good solution so long as we don't need root perms at all. I think having a "promenade" user and a "deckhand" user is a little much unless we have reasons | 14:37 |
| mattmceuen | I am also a fan of following the OSH convention of injecting the running-as user as declarative intent (i.e. operator-specific configuration) for situations where there doesn't need to be any special handling (root filesystem type stuff) | 14:39 |
| mattmceuen | the majority of containers shouldn't know or care what users other containers are running as | 14:39 |
| mattmceuen | There has definitely been a desire to make more of our running-as-root containers run as non-root | 14:40 |
| mattmceuen | I propose we bring this to the design call, so we can see it from all angles | 14:40 |
| alexanderhughes | sounds good | 14:41 |
| mattmceuen | ok cool - I will add it to the agenda | 14:42 |
| ian-pittwood | Ok | 14:42 |
| kskels | that does sound good and in the meantime, perhaps this is something we could add in the treasuremap as workaround | 14:42 |
| kskels | https://github.com/airshipit/treasuremap/blob/master/tools/airship#L121 | 14:42 |
| mattmceuen | personally I want to talk through the problem live, I don't think I get it 100% yet :) | 14:42 |
| kskels | is what we use right now, but we could use "current" user | 14:42 |
| kskels | anyway! thank you | 14:42 |
| mattmceuen | great, ty for sharing that kaspars | 14:42 |
| mattmceuen | ok, next up: | 14:43 |
| mattmceuen | #topic Review Requests | 14:43 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Review Requests (Meeting topic: airship)" | 14:43 | |
| mattmceuen | We have a good list today folks | 14:43 |
| mattmceuen | And I know that a number of people are heading out on a plane in the next couple days | 14:43 |
| mattmceuen | So let's please get some focus on these today and tomorrow so we are in good shape for new discussions at Shanghai | 14:43 |
| mattmceuen | https://review.opendev.org/686758 - adds testing expectations for airshipctl | 14:43 |
| mattmceuen | https://review.opendev.org/689051 - updates airshipctl unit tests to use "testify" | 14:43 |
| mattmceuen | https://review.opendev.org/#/c/691746/2 - Shipyard default network policies | 14:43 |
| mattmceuen | https://review.opendev.org/#/c/675851 - airshipctl Add logic to isogen subcommand | 14:43 |
| *** mattmceuen has quit IRC | 14:43 | |
| *** mattmceuen has joined #airshipit | 14:44 | |
| mattmceuen | weird, I'm not sure why pasting those kicked me out of IRC :) | 14:44 |
| pramchan | Also can you add review from flight plan - https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/Airship_FlightPlan | 14:45 |
| pramchan | These need review in community | 14:45 |
| mattmceuen | CONFIG STUFF | 14:45 |
| mattmceuen | https://review.opendev.org/689859 | 14:45 |
| mattmceuen | https://review.opendev.org/688914 | 14:45 |
| *** mattmceuen has quit IRC | 14:45 | |
| *** mattmceuen has joined #airshipit | 14:45 | |
| mattmceuen | yep - hopefully those came through ok, IRCCloud is behaving a little weird for me today | 14:46 |
| mattmceuen | I've added them into the IRC agenda as well | 14:46 |
| mattmceuen | We have a bit of a backlog of Airship 2.0 patches team | 14:47 |
| mattmceuen | Will be really valuable, as well as a great way to get experience with go, and get started in Airship 2.0 dev, to give those some solid review | 14:47 |
| pramchan | +1 | 14:47 |
| mattmceuen | #topic Roundtable | 14:48 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Roundtable (Meeting topic: airship)" | 14:48 | |
| mattmceuen | we have a few minutes left team - I have one more small item | 14:48 |
| mattmceuen | A number of folks will be in Shanghai next week; shall we cancel next Tuesday's team meeting? | 14:48 |
| mattmceuen | Usually we do, but I didn't want to unilaterally decide :) | 14:49 |
| mattmceuen | do cancel, I mean | 14:50 |
| dwalt | I am in favor, unless someone has pressing items | 14:50 |
| kskels | Same, as I will be away | 14:50 |
| *** ab2434_ has quit IRC | 14:50 | |
| pramchan | +1 | 14:50 |
| mattmceuen | ok, sounds good -- I will send a note out on the mailing list to make sure everyone knows | 14:50 |
| *** LoicL35 has joined #airshipit | 14:51 | |
| mattmceuen | any other roundtable items? | 14:51 |
| openstackgerrit | Jagan Mohan Kavva proposed airship/treasuremap master: Integrate compute utility container in airship/treasuremap https://review.opendev.org/691875 | 14:51 |
| mattmceuen | In that case, thanks all for a good meeting! | 14:52 |
| mattmceuen | Have a great week, and for those in Shanghai, good luck and have fun! | 14:52 |
| mattmceuen | let us know if you need anything :) | 14:52 |
| mattmceuen | #endmeeting | 14:52 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "https://opendev.org/airship || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Airship || https://review.opendev.org/#/q/projects:airship+status:open+NOT+label:Verified%253D-1+NOT+label:Workflow%253D-1+NOT+message:DNM+NOT+message:WIP" | 14:52 | |
| openstack | Meeting ended Tue Oct 29 14:52:29 2019 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 14:52 |
| openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/airship/2019/airship.2019-10-29-14.00.html | 14:52 |
| openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/airship/2019/airship.2019-10-29-14.00.txt | 14:52 |
| openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/airship/2019/airship.2019-10-29-14.00.log.html | 14:52 |
| openstackgerrit | Sean Eagan proposed airship/promenade master: [WIP] Add kubelet_config chart https://review.opendev.org/691876 | 14:53 |
| roman_g | Thanks, mattmceuen | 14:53 |
| kskels | thank you and see you some of you in the summit! | 14:53 |
| pramchan | Thanks and hope to see kskels and others at PTG. | 14:54 |
| *** shubham_kaushal has quit IRC | 15:03 | |
| *** shubham_kaushal_ is now known as shubham_kaushal | 15:03 | |
| openstackgerrit | Ian Howell proposed airship/airshipctl master: This removes golangci-lint as a go module dependency. https://review.opendev.org/690422 | 15:04 |
| *** SRao has joined #airshipit | 15:09 | |
| *** LoicL35 has quit IRC | 15:13 | |
| *** dpawlik has quit IRC | 15:18 | |
| *** pgaxatte has quit IRC | 15:19 | |
| *** pramchan has quit IRC | 15:24 | |
| *** ian-pittwood has left #airshipit | 15:28 | |
| *** segorov has quit IRC | 15:28 | |
| *** segorov has joined #airshipit | 15:29 | |
| openstackgerrit | Roman Gorshunov proposed airship/docs master: Add container image and Dockerfile conventions https://review.opendev.org/685038 | 15:30 |
| openstackgerrit | Sean Eagan proposed airship/promenade master: [WIP] Add kubelet_config chart https://review.opendev.org/691876 | 15:32 |
| *** pgaxatte has joined #airshipit | 15:40 | |
| openstackgerrit | Merged airship/treasuremap master: Add image overrides for all the charts https://review.opendev.org/691042 | 15:47 |
| openstackgerrit | Nishant Kumar proposed airship/maas master: [WIP] Support rotation for maas region secret https://review.opendev.org/691706 | 16:03 |
| *** bh526r has quit IRC | 16:29 | |
| openstackgerrit | Evgeniy L proposed airship/treasuremap master: [WIP][DNM] Initial implementation of network policies for UCP https://review.opendev.org/684133 | 16:33 |
| openstackgerrit | Ian Howell proposed airship/airshipctl master: Fix the `make cover` target https://review.opendev.org/689051 | 16:46 |
| openstackgerrit | Ian Howell proposed airship/airshipctl master: Fix the `make cover` target https://review.opendev.org/689051 | 16:46 |
| openstackgerrit | Ian Howell proposed airship/airshipctl master: This updates the current unit tests for testify https://review.opendev.org/689051 | 16:52 |
| openstackgerrit | Roman Gorshunov proposed airship/docs master: Add container image and Dockerfile conventions https://review.opendev.org/685038 | 16:53 |
| openstackgerrit | Ian Howell proposed airship/airshipctl master: This updates the current unit tests for testify https://review.opendev.org/689051 | 16:53 |
| openstackgerrit | Ian Howell proposed airship/airshipctl master: Fix the `make cover` target https://review.opendev.org/691916 | 16:54 |
| howell | *Sorry about the rapid-fire commits - botched some git stuff | 16:54 |
| *** sreejithp has quit IRC | 17:01 | |
| *** shubham_kaushal has quit IRC | 17:12 | |
| *** pgaxatte has quit IRC | 17:16 | |
| *** jamesgu has quit IRC | 17:19 | |
| openstackgerrit | Nishant Kumar proposed airship/maas master: [WIP] Support rotation for maas region secret https://review.opendev.org/691706 | 17:21 |
| *** AlexNoskov has joined #airshipit | 17:26 | |
| *** segorov has quit IRC | 17:39 | |
| openstackgerrit | Rahul Khiyani proposed airship/treasuremap master: Fix path for calicoctl-utility https://review.opendev.org/691932 | 18:05 |
| *** SRao has quit IRC | 18:07 | |
| *** SRao has joined #airshipit | 18:18 | |
| *** segorov has joined #airshipit | 18:29 | |
| *** segorov has quit IRC | 18:43 | |
| *** segorov has joined #airshipit | 18:44 | |
| openstackgerrit | Rodolfo Pacheco proposed airship/airshipctl master: airshipctl config (replace 686508) https://review.opendev.org/689859 | 18:52 |
| openstackgerrit | kanwar saad bin liaqat proposed airship/airshipctl master: Bootstrap redfish Remote direct https://review.opendev.org/683165 | 19:22 |
| *** jamesgu has joined #airshipit | 19:26 | |
| *** alexanderhughes has quit IRC | 19:43 | |
| openstackgerrit | Merged airship/treasuremap master: Fix path for calicoctl-utility https://review.opendev.org/691932 | 19:55 |
| *** dpawlik has joined #airshipit | 20:14 | |
| *** dpawlik has quit IRC | 20:19 | |
| openstackgerrit | Jagan Mohan Kavva proposed airship/treasuremap master: Integrate etcdctl utility container in airship/treasuremap https://review.opendev.org/680482 | 20:27 |
| openstackgerrit | Rodolfo Pacheco proposed airship/airshipctl master: airshipctl config (replace 686508) https://review.opendev.org/689859 | 20:34 |
| *** roman_g has quit IRC | 20:37 | |
| *** roman_g has joined #airshipit | 20:38 | |
| *** roman_g has quit IRC | 20:38 | |
| *** roman_g has joined #airshipit | 20:39 | |
| *** roman_g has quit IRC | 20:39 | |
| *** roman_g has joined #airshipit | 20:40 | |
| *** roman_g has quit IRC | 20:40 | |
| *** roman_g has joined #airshipit | 20:40 | |
| *** roman_g has quit IRC | 20:41 | |
| *** roman_g has joined #airshipit | 20:41 | |
| *** roman_g has quit IRC | 20:41 | |
| *** roman_g has joined #airshipit | 20:42 | |
| *** roman_g has quit IRC | 20:42 | |
| *** roman_g has joined #airshipit | 20:43 | |
| *** roman_g has quit IRC | 20:43 | |
| openstackgerrit | Rahul Khiyani proposed airship/treasuremap master: Integrate ceph utility container in airship/treasuremap https://review.opendev.org/681135 | 21:16 |
| *** rezroo has joined #airshipit | 21:22 | |
| openstackgerrit | Jagan Mohan Kavva proposed airship/treasuremap master: Integrate compute utility container in airship/treasuremap https://review.opendev.org/691875 | 21:46 |
| openstackgerrit | Jagan Mohan Kavva proposed airship/treasuremap master: Integrate compute utility container in airship/treasuremap https://review.opendev.org/691875 | 21:56 |
| *** jamesgu has quit IRC | 21:59 | |
| *** SRao has quit IRC | 22:25 | |
| *** jamesgu has joined #airshipit | 22:58 | |
| openstackgerrit | Prateek Dodda proposed airship/treasuremap master: Integrate openstack utility container in airship/treasuremap https://review.opendev.org/691731 | 22:59 |
| openstackgerrit | Prateek Dodda proposed airship/treasuremap master: Integrate openstack utility container in airship/treasuremap https://review.opendev.org/691731 | 23:21 |
| *** segorov has quit IRC | 23:22 | |
| openstackgerrit | Prateek Dodda proposed airship/treasuremap master: Integrate openstack utility container in airship/treasuremap https://review.opendev.org/691731 | 23:23 |
| openstackgerrit | Rodolfo Pacheco proposed airship/airshipctl master: airshipctl config (replace 686508) https://review.opendev.org/689859 | 23:38 |
| openstackgerrit | Rodolfo Pacheco proposed airship/airshipctl master: airshipctl config (replace 686508) https://review.opendev.org/689859 | 23:43 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!