| *** vishalmanchanda has joined #cloudkitty | 03:00 | |
| *** sboyron has joined #cloudkitty | 08:12 | |
| *** fresta has quit IRC | 10:04 | |
| *** fresta has joined #cloudkitty | 10:15 | |
| *** fresta has quit IRC | 11:08 | |
| *** fresta has joined #cloudkitty | 11:21 | |
| *** rafaelweingartne has joined #cloudkitty | 13:54 | |
| rafaelweingartne | #startmeeting cloudkitty | 14:01 |
|---|---|---|
| openstack | Meeting started Mon Mar 8 14:01:00 2021 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is rafaelweingartne. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 14:01 |
| openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 14:01 |
| *** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: cloudkitty)" | 14:01 | |
| openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'cloudkitty' | 14:01 |
| rafaelweingartne | Roll count | 14:01 |
| priteau | o/ | 14:01 |
| mkarpiarz | Hi! | 14:02 |
| jopdorp_ | o/ | 14:02 |
| *** mnaser has quit IRC | 14:03 | |
| *** mnaser has joined #cloudkitty | 14:03 | |
| *** mnaser has quit IRC | 14:03 | |
| *** mnaser has joined #cloudkitty | 14:03 | |
| rafaelweingartne | #topic Review priorities | 14:04 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Review priorities (Meeting topic: cloudkitty)" | 14:04 | |
| rafaelweingartne | Do you guys have some review priorities to ask for? | 14:04 |
| jopdorp_ | none for me | 14:04 |
| mkarpiarz | Just FYI that I'm testing https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cloudkitty/+/778922 | 14:05 |
| rafaelweingartne | I create a new patch to allow the admin to use multiple filters of the same type ('project_id') in the summary GET API. It would be interesting to get some opinions there. | 14:05 |
| rafaelweingartne | mkarpiarz: Thanks! | 14:05 |
| mkarpiarz | Sure thing. | 14:06 |
| mkarpiarz | Anything else worth looking into? | 14:08 |
| rafaelweingartne | Not from my side | 14:09 |
| rafaelweingartne | maybe we have a release coming, but I need to take a look into the process | 14:09 |
| rafaelweingartne | pierre: have you ever closed a Cloudkitty release before? | 14:09 |
| priteau | Yes, it's easy | 14:10 |
| priteau | Just need to tag an RC1 of the various components | 14:10 |
| rafaelweingartne | I see | 14:10 |
| rafaelweingartne | do we get a ping to execute this process? | 14:10 |
| priteau | I think so, the release management team will propose something | 14:11 |
| priteau | https://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/release-management.html | 14:11 |
| rafaelweingartne | Ok, thanks | 14:11 |
| priteau | But I will monitor once we are near | 14:11 |
| rafaelweingartne | ok, thanks for the help | 14:12 |
| rafaelweingartne | So, moving on | 14:13 |
| rafaelweingartne | #topic AOB | 14:14 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "AOB (Meeting topic: cloudkitty)" | 14:14 | |
| rafaelweingartne | Now, I open for general questions and topics that people might have. | 14:14 |
| mkarpiarz | Nothing from my side. | 14:14 |
| priteau | This week is feature freeze so we should wrap up patches | 14:15 |
| priteau | (although our PTL can grant exceptions) | 14:15 |
| priteau | Which patches do we think are in a good state for Wallaby? | 14:15 |
| priteau | mkarpiarz: Is NOTNUMBOOL still WIP? | 14:16 |
| mkarpiarz | Yeah, I need to add docs. | 14:17 |
| rafaelweingartne | this one seems to be ready as well: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cloudkitty/+/774520 | 14:18 |
| rafaelweingartne | priteau: I did not understand your comment in: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cloudkitty/+/774634 | 14:19 |
| rafaelweingartne | could you clarify it? | 14:20 |
| priteau | Well, it's my fault. You originally suggested something like last_processed_timestamp | 14:20 |
| priteau | And I asked to change it to last_processed_at to make it similar to timestamps in other OpenStack DBs | 14:20 |
| priteau | But it's a different meaning: it doesn't really track when the last period was processed, but which one | 14:21 |
| priteau | i.e. if you stop cloudkitty and restart it several hours later, this value will be set to times from the past (until it progressively syncs with present) | 14:22 |
| priteau | Do you see what I mean? | 14:22 |
| rafaelweingartne | yes, I see | 14:24 |
| rafaelweingartne | and yes, that is what happens | 14:24 |
| rafaelweingartne | I do not see the problem with this name though | 14:24 |
| priteau | Well, last_processed_at could make you think that it is the time the period is actually processed | 14:25 |
| priteau | Maybe just call it "last_processed"? | 14:25 |
| rafaelweingartne | Hmm, I see | 14:26 |
| rafaelweingartne | I would like to see an "at" or "timestamp" wording | 14:26 |
| rafaelweingartne | otherwise, just reading, we do not know what the type of the field is | 14:26 |
| rafaelweingartne | What do others think? | 14:27 |
| priteau | So last_processed_timestamp or last_processed_time? | 14:27 |
| priteau | Like you originally suggested | 14:27 |
| rafaelweingartne | mkarpiarz? | 14:28 |
| mkarpiarz | Not sure about this one. | 14:29 |
| rafaelweingartne | priteau: if we decide to change? What do we do? I mean, we create a new spec to amend the one that has been merged? | 14:29 |
| priteau | It's not a formal process. If we all agree on the code review, we can change the spec later. | 14:30 |
| rafaelweingartne | I see | 14:31 |
| rafaelweingartne | if you all agree, I can change to last_processed_timestamp or last_processed_time, then | 14:32 |
| priteau | It would be good to understand if it's the time of the start or end of the last period | 14:33 |
| rafaelweingartne | it is the last timestamp that has been processed | 14:33 |
| rafaelweingartne | I will do the change then | 14:37 |
| rafaelweingartne | and we can discuss afterwards in the patch | 14:37 |
| priteau | Thanks | 14:37 |
| mkarpiarz | OK | 14:38 |
| rafaelweingartne | If we do no have anything else | 14:45 |
| rafaelweingartne | I will close the meeting in the next 5 minutes | 14:46 |
| rafaelweingartne | Thank you guys for participating. Have a nice week. | 14:46 |
| priteau | Thanks rafaelweingartne! | 14:46 |
| mkarpiarz | Thank you all! | 14:47 |
| rafaelweingartne | #endmeeting | 14:51 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Rating component for OpenStack https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/CloudKitty" | 14:51 | |
| openstack | Meeting ended Mon Mar 8 14:51:32 2021 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 14:51 |
| openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/cloudkitty/2021/cloudkitty.2021-03-08-14.01.html | 14:51 |
| openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/cloudkitty/2021/cloudkitty.2021-03-08-14.01.txt | 14:51 |
| openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/cloudkitty/2021/cloudkitty.2021-03-08-14.01.log.html | 14:51 |
| *** rafaelweingartne has quit IRC | 14:51 | |
| *** gmann is now known as gmann_afk | 16:01 | |
| *** gmann_afk is now known as gmann | 19:32 | |
| *** vishalmanchanda has quit IRC | 20:47 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.2 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!