| tkajinam | ricolin, hi. could you please check this release patch ? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/812346 | 02:16 |
|---|---|---|
| tkajinam | ricolin, it turned out there are still some codes dependent on volume v2 api in current rc1. The fixes to switch to volume v3 api were backported to xena last night and I believe we should include the fix in coming Xena release | 02:18 |
| tkajinam | ramishra, ^^^ fyi | 02:18 |
| opendevreview | Brendan Shephard proposed openstack/heat master: Drop six library https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/heat/+/812367 | 02:49 |
| opendevreview | Brendan Shephard proposed openstack/heat master: Drop six library https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/heat/+/812367 | 02:50 |
| *** ysandeep|out is now known as ysandeep | 05:37 | |
| opendevreview | OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/heat master: Imported Translations from Zanata https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/heat/+/809949 | 07:08 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/heat master: Drop six library https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/heat/+/812367 | 08:21 |
| *** ysandeep is now known as ysandeep|lunch | 09:00 | |
| *** ysandeep|lunch is now known as ysandeep | 09:48 | |
| lajoskatona | Hi Heat team, A have a question if we can use openstacksdk instead of python-neutronclient as networking client? | 12:28 |
| lajoskatona | If I understand well the code (not a Heat expert myself) the networkign client is created somehwere here: https://opendev.org/openstack/heat/src/branch/master/heat/engine/clients/os/neutron/__init__.py#L57-L69 | 12:28 |
| lajoskatona | and it seems like it is hardcoded to use neutronclient, but not sure if there's an option for new resources to use python binding from openstacksdk if not | 12:29 |
| *** ysandeep is now known as ysandeep|afk | 12:34 | |
| *** blarnath is now known as d34dh0r53 | 13:09 | |
| *** ysandeep|afk is now known as ysandeep | 13:26 | |
| zaneb | lajoskatona: you are correct. in theory all client plugins should be rewritten to use openstacksdk eventually, at least once it's feature complete. | 13:56 |
| zaneb | to date https://opendev.org/openstack/heat/src/branch/master/heat/engine/clients/os/senlin.py is the only one using it afaik | 13:56 |
| lajoskatona | zaneb: thanks, I check it and ask around | 13:57 |
| lajoskatona | I mean if it worth to work on it | 13:57 |
| zaneb | lajoskatona: out of curiosity, what do you expect to be able to do with openstacksdk that you can't do with neutronclient? | 14:16 |
| lajoskatona | zaneb: sorry I had meetings. So it's not about features, but not doing things twice. The cli part of neutronclient is deprecated, for python-bindings we have to add new features to openstacksdk and to neutronclient as well | 15:35 |
| zaneb | right, yeah. and we can do a mixture if necessary (new features through sdk, without necessarily rewriting everything that's there) | 15:47 |
| lajoskatona | zaneb: is it possible to have 2 client backend, sdk for new and neutronclient for old features? | 15:48 |
| lajoskatona | zaneb: and perhaps a migration plan to make life easier | 15:48 |
| zaneb | are you asking something different from what I just said? | 15:49 |
| lajoskatona | just wanted to be sure that it is technically possible without refactoring big chunks of heat :-) | 15:52 |
| zaneb | the client plugins are pretty self-contained (in fact, individual methods in them are pretty self-contained), so it shouldn't be a huge problem | 16:28 |
| *** ysandeep is now known as ysandeep|dinner | 16:30 | |
| *** ysandeep|dinner is now known as ysandeep | 17:33 | |
| *** ysandeep is now known as ysandeep|out | 19:20 | |
| *** tamas_erdei is now known as terdei | 20:32 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.2 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!