| *** hashar has joined #kata-dev | 06:22 | |
| *** sgarzare has joined #kata-dev | 07:17 | |
| *** sameo has joined #kata-dev | 07:24 | |
| *** jodh has joined #kata-dev | 07:26 | |
| *** hashar has quit IRC | 07:47 | |
| *** davidgiluk has joined #kata-dev | 08:05 | |
| *** pcaruana has joined #kata-dev | 08:23 | |
| *** jodh has quit IRC | 08:30 | |
| *** jodh has joined #kata-dev | 08:31 | |
| *** jugs1 has quit IRC | 10:25 | |
| *** jugs1 has joined #kata-dev | 10:26 | |
| kata-irc-bot | <georg.kunz> Hi all. I’d like to ask you a use case question: do you generally consider the sandbox (image + kernel [+ VMM]) to be a fixed part of the infrastructure provided by a given kata installation OR do you also consider the use case in which an application might want to bring a custom sandbox. I assume I am not the first one asking for the latter :slightly_smiling_face: so I am wondering if there is a recommended way to ship a sandbox wi | 12:39 |
|---|---|---|
| kata-irc-bot | an application? | 12:39 |
| *** crobinso has joined #kata-dev | 12:41 | |
| *** devimc has joined #kata-dev | 13:07 | |
| *** devimc has quit IRC | 13:46 | |
| *** dklyle has joined #kata-dev | 14:23 | |
| *** dklyle has quit IRC | 14:24 | |
| *** dklyle has joined #kata-dev | 14:24 | |
| *** devimc has joined #kata-dev | 14:44 | |
| *** devimc has quit IRC | 16:38 | |
| *** devimc has joined #kata-dev | 16:39 | |
| *** devimc has quit IRC | 16:40 | |
| *** devimc has joined #kata-dev | 16:40 | |
| *** devimc has quit IRC | 16:41 | |
| *** devimc has joined #kata-dev | 16:48 | |
| *** jodh has quit IRC | 17:01 | |
| *** sgarzare has quit IRC | 17:41 | |
| *** hashar has joined #kata-dev | 18:59 | |
| *** davidgiluk has quit IRC | 19:10 | |
| *** pcaruana has quit IRC | 20:11 | |
| *** hashar has quit IRC | 20:11 | |
| *** sameo has quit IRC | 20:29 | |
| *** devimc has quit IRC | 21:19 | |
| *** crobinso has quit IRC | 23:49 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.2 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!