| kata-irc-bot | <liuj97> Is there any policy/guidelines to publish rust crates to crates.io from Kata project? | 03:09 |
|---|---|---|
| kata-irc-bot | <liuj97> There are some library crates which may be reused by other projects too | 03:10 |
| kata-irc-bot | <bergwolf> Does it require special privilege to do so? | 04:15 |
| kata-irc-bot | <fidencio> @liuj97, do you want those to be standalone projects under https://github.com/kata-containers/kata-containers? | 07:15 |
| kata-irc-bot | <fidencio> I think it's okay, but I'd open an issue and cc the architecture committee, just to be sure everyone is on the same page about that | 07:16 |
| kata-irc-bot | <zmlcc> In a typical case (one container in one pod), it takes | 08:08 |
| kata-irc-bot | <liuj97> for example, I hope to publish the ongoing src/libs/safe-path, so it could be consumed by image-rs from the confidential containers project | 08:18 |
| kata-irc-bot | <fidencio> Okay, so it's from inside Kata Containers, and it should be ready to be consumed from outside | 08:35 |
| kata-irc-bot | <fidencio> @liuj97, can you give us a day or so just to figure out the logistics involved on this? | 08:35 |
| kata-irc-bot | <fidencio> And we have this settled by the next A/C meeting? (mind that I am not sure when you guys will be off) | 08:36 |
| kata-irc-bot | <liuj97> sure, I just raise this issue for discussion in advance:). We are still reviewing the safe-path crate:) | 08:42 |
| kata-irc-bot | <liuj97> https://github.com/kata-containers/kata-containers/issues/3451 | 08:44 |
| kata-irc-bot | <jakob.naucke> or maybe it's just more healthy now by itself because reproducible errors would be too easy | 11:07 |
| kata-irc-bot | <samuel.ortiz> @zmlcc The ttrpc threads are controlled and managed by the ttrpc crate I assume? Then about those 10 threads a) it’s probably suboptimal; b) I dont think any of them are performance critical and would greatly benefit from a fully async engine and c) a low number for the cost of moving to a completely async model | 13:28 |
| kata-irc-bot | <james.o.hunt> We've recently updated the Kata project glossary: https://github.com/kata-containers/kata-containers/wiki/Glossary. Feel free to hack on improving it further though everyone! | 13:55 |
| kata-irc-bot | <christophe> We were discussing a glossary for confidential computing. Should it go at the same place, maybe with a color / font convention for CC terms, or do we want a separate doc? | 14:00 |
| kata-irc-bot | <james.o.hunt> @christophe - yep, I raised https://github.com/confidential-containers/documentation/issues/13 as I *really* think that project needs one due to all the acronymns and abbreviations. | 16:33 |
| kata-irc-bot | <james.o.hunt> tbh, I think it makes sense to keep the separate for now, but note that the Kata glossary does mentioned CC and links to that GH project. | 16:34 |
| kata-irc-bot | <james.o.hunt> keep them* | 16:34 |
| kata-irc-bot | <eric.ernst> :meow_peek: could use an ack on a lint cleanup in the agent: https://github.com/kata-containers/kata-containers/pull/3531/files | 18:47 |
| kata-irc-bot | <eric.ernst> Sorry, didn’t intent to ghost you here! | 19:28 |
| kata-irc-bot | <eric.ernst> Is this on a specifc test, or do you think this is just a rare occurence as part of standard pod lifecycle on s390x? Can you reproduce using something like containerd-stress? | 19:32 |
| kata-irc-bot | <eric.ernst> I think if you go have a nice weekend, the solution will be obvious come monday :) | 19:32 |
| kata-irc-bot | <jakob.naucke> For disclosure: It's not happening right now and experiments might be difficult, but thanks for responding! > What happens with respect to upper layer runtime (containerd/crio?)? You mean: Does containerd think that there is still a container? No. > Is this on a specifc test, or do you think this is just a rare occurence as part of standard pod lifecycle on s390x? When it did happen, I was able to reproduce this with the most basic | 19:34 |
| kata-irc-bot | of k8s pods, but _not_ e.g. with `ctr`. | 19:34 |
| kata-irc-bot | <eric.ernst> when it is/was failing, how often would it? | 19:43 |
| kata-irc-bot | <eric.ernst> 100%, 1% ? | 19:43 |
| kata-irc-bot | <jakob.naucke> Spectrum unfortunately. There has been a time where it was seemingly (locally) 100%, OTOH, we didn't see it on the last couple of CI runs. | 19:46 |
| kata-irc-bot | <eric.ernst> “fun” | 19:46 |
| kata-irc-bot | <fidencio> @chen.bo, @jose.carlos.venegas.m, and it seems I need to get back to the drawing table with this clh-selinux patch, as the network is not actually working from inside the container. Yay, more things more next week, it seems. :slightly_smiling_face: | 21:07 |
| kata-irc-bot | <jose.carlos.venegas.m> more fun, with networking ah! cool please let us know how it goes , I am happy to learn more about networking (troubleshooting) | 21:09 |
| kata-irc-bot | <eric.ernst> Hey ya’ll, I know some of you are thinking, gosh, its friday afternoon (or saturday early early AM), I wish I had an amazing PR to review. Well folks - I’m here for you. PTAL @ https://github.com/kata-containers/kata-containers/pull/2941 | 22:42 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!