kata-irc-bot | <bergwolf> This is really useful but hard to validate with normal CI environment. So I'm wondering if we have CIs for vfio-pci? And are we going to add more for vfio-ap? | 06:17 |
---|---|---|
kata-irc-bot | <bbolroc> Yes, I agree with your opinion (hard to validate with normal CI. For s390x, we do not have any Jenkins slaves to which AP devices are attached.) The PR has been tested on our internal machine. We are currently preparing a special machine on a yellow zone (reachable from external and internal). After the preparation is finished, I would expect we could make a separate job to validate vfio-ap. | 08:45 |
kata-irc-bot | <bbolroc> Hi, I would like to make CI jobs for s390x faster (atm, around 1h20m) like those for x86 (around 30m) and I would be thankful if someone from the CI administrators could leave any info for how-to in this issue: https://github.com/kata-containers/ci/issues/486 Thanks! | 09:04 |
kata-irc-bot | <fidencio> The following PRs need a timely review, so we can finally unblock the current release. 2.5.0-rc0: • kata-containers: https://github.com/kata-containers/kata-containers/pull/4591 and https://github.com/kata-containers/kata-containers/pull/4592 • tests: https://github.com/kata-containers/tests/pull/4906 2.4.3: • kata-containers: https://github.com/kata-containers/kata-containers/pull/4593 • tests: | 20:37 |
kata-irc-bot | https://github.com/kata-containers/tests/pull/4907 | 20:37 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!