Friday, 2021-02-12

kata-irc-bot<v.nandha> Hi, I am testing katav2, i found that routing table inside the pod is not correctly setup  kata v2: ```[root@linux-6b849976b-mnj6k /]# uname -a Linux linux-6b849976b-mnj6k 5.4.71 #1 SMP Tue Jan 19 20:06:59 UTC 2021 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux [root@linux-6b849976b-mnj6k /]# route -n Kernel IP routing table Destination     Gateway         Genmask         Flags Metric Ref    Use Iface 10.196.182.32   0.0.0.0         255.255.255.22405:37
kata-irc-botU     0      0        0 eth0```  /opt/kata/bin/kata-runtime --version   : 2.0.1    commit   : 3df65f4f3a439c8c7b97dd581f8ff4fc1c877a70    OCI specs: 1.0.1-dev vs kata v1 ```[root@linux-6b849976b-cmtjx /]# uname -a Linux linux-6b849976b-cmtjx 4.19.86-7.1.container #1 SMP Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 UTC 1970 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux [root@linux-6b849976b-cmtjx /]# route -n Kernel IP routing table Destination     Gateway         Genmask05:37
kata-irc-botFlags Metric Ref    Use Iface 0.0.0.0         10.196.152.1    0.0.0.0         UG    0      0        0 eth0 10.196.152.0    10.196.152.1    255.255.255.224 UG    0      0        0 eth0 10.196.152.1    0.0.0.0         255.255.255.255 UH    0      0        0 eth0```05:37
kata-irc-bot<eric.ernst> Can you try building from source on 2.0 @v.nandha ?05:50
kata-irc-bot<eric.ernst> Net link crate was updated05:51
kata-irc-bot<v.nandha> I used https://github.com/kata-containers/kata-containers/releases/tag/2.0.105:51
kata-irc-bot<eric.ernst> I expect this to be fixed, and if not would open an issue to address.05:51
kata-irc-bot<v.nandha> the kata-static-2.0.1-x86_64.tar.xz05:51
kata-irc-bot<eric.ernst> Yeah, if you can, you’ll want to try w newer agent.05:51
kata-irc-bot<v.nandha> ah i see, some fix went in05:52
kata-irc-bot<eric.ernst> Latest from main. We will have a release for it in 1.5 AFAIU.05:52
kata-irc-bot<v.nandha> Just wanted to confirm my approach of initial installation, is that correct like using that kata-static.xg file?05:54
*** sameo has joined #kata-general06:05
kata-irc-bot<v.nandha> Sure, please let me know I can also open a issue with above details if needed06:06
*** brueckner has joined #kata-general07:41
*** sgarzare has joined #kata-general07:50
*** th0din has quit IRC10:05
*** th0din has joined #kata-general10:07
*** devimc has joined #kata-general12:42
kata-irc-bot<eric.ernst> Yeah. That’s fine. We just hadn’t made a build Since that fix went in.13:19
*** fuentess has joined #kata-general14:17
*** fuentess has quit IRC15:23
*** fuentess has joined #kata-general15:24
*** fuentess has quit IRC16:01
*** fuentess has joined #kata-general16:04
*** sameo has quit IRC16:24
*** devimc has quit IRC16:45
*** devimc has joined #kata-general16:45
*** brueckner has quit IRC17:07
kata-irc-bot<apocalipse89> Hi people :slightly_smiling_face: I have a question about Kata Containers and Pod Overhead in Kubernetes. running kata-containers on kubernetes it is recommended to create a RuntimeClass for kata and define there the overehead. but i do not fully understand something. from what I’ve understood, correct if I’m wrong, the overhead that we set at the level of the RuntimeClass is just to keep into account during Pod allocation t17:25
kata-irc-botresources consumed by the hypervisor (for instance QEMU) and consider the resource requests/limits as the resources allocated only for the VM? Did I get it right?17:25
*** sgarzare has quit IRC17:57
*** sameo has joined #kata-general18:32
*** fuentess has quit IRC19:56
*** fuentess has joined #kata-general20:16
*** fuentess has quit IRC20:21
*** sameo has quit IRC21:54
*** devimc has quit IRC21:58
*** fuentess has joined #kata-general22:02
*** fuentess has quit IRC22:07
*** fuentess1 has joined #kata-general22:08
*** fuentess1 has quit IRC22:26
*** fuentess has joined #kata-general22:27
*** fuentess has quit IRC22:29
*** fuentess has joined #kata-general22:30
*** fuentess has quit IRC22:32
*** fuentess1 has joined #kata-general22:32

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.2 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!