Friday, 2021-03-05

*** sjas has quit IRC00:15
*** sjas has joined #kata-general00:17
*** fuentess has quit IRC00:19
*** irclogbot_1 has quit IRC02:52
*** irclogbot_0 has joined #kata-general02:54
*** sameo has joined #kata-general07:22
*** sgarzare has joined #kata-general07:48
*** fuentess has joined #kata-general14:16
*** sameo has quit IRC14:40
*** sameo has joined #kata-general14:43
*** th0din_ has quit IRC15:40
*** th0din has joined #kata-general15:42
kata-irc-bot<ieb> Hi, are there any known problems performance problems running a multi threaded JVM inside a Kata container relative to a standard container (runc iirc) ?   I have been doing some testing and while I see Kata being 17% faster with a JVM running 1024 unsynchronised threads in a test case, I am seeing significant  slow down (ie 5x) when running a JVM application with fewer threads. Still trying to find out why. sysbench running threads with16:42
kata-irc-botsynchronisation falls off a cliff at over 32 threads, although this might not be relevant. I am going to get some data on using locks and synchronisation inside the JVM to see if that triggers the behaviour. The team managing the setup who I am working with say the versions are `Kata 1.11.5, CRI-O 1.17.5, Flatcar 2605.12.0 and qemu5.0-virtiofs-with51bits-dax`  hopefully that make sense.  Has anyone seen this before?16:42
*** fuentess has quit IRC17:17
*** fuentess has joined #kata-general17:50
*** irclogbot_0 has quit IRC18:03
*** irclogbot_1 has joined #kata-general18:04
*** fuentess has quit IRC18:13
*** fuentess has joined #kata-general18:16
*** irclogbot_1 has quit IRC18:24
*** irclogbot_3 has joined #kata-general18:27
*** fuentess has quit IRC18:52
*** sgarzare has quit IRC19:48
*** fuentess has joined #kata-general20:26
kata-irc-bot<fidencio> @ieb, I'm interested on your benchmarks results.20:57
kata-irc-bot<fidencio> cc @christophe20:57
*** sameo has quit IRC21:25

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.2 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!