*** nunosantos has joined #magnetodb | 00:26 | |
*** charlesw has joined #magnetodb | 01:39 | |
*** vnaboychenko has quit IRC | 02:10 | |
*** charlesw has quit IRC | 02:23 | |
*** rushiagr_away is now known as rushiagr | 03:27 | |
*** charlesw has joined #magnetodb | 03:30 | |
*** rushiagr is now known as rushiagr_away | 03:53 | |
*** nunosantos has quit IRC | 04:06 | |
*** charlesw has quit IRC | 04:20 | |
*** vnaboychenko has joined #magnetodb | 04:26 | |
*** rushiagr_away is now known as rushiagr | 04:33 | |
*** vnaboychenko has quit IRC | 04:33 | |
*** vnaboych_ has joined #magnetodb | 04:33 | |
*** vivekd has joined #magnetodb | 04:47 | |
*** ajayaa has joined #magnetodb | 05:57 | |
*** vivekd has quit IRC | 06:02 | |
*** vivekd has joined #magnetodb | 06:15 | |
*** k4n0 has joined #magnetodb | 06:33 | |
*** romainh has joined #magnetodb | 07:15 | |
*** vnaboych_ has quit IRC | 08:03 | |
*** vnaboychenko has joined #magnetodb | 11:04 | |
*** vnaboychenko has quit IRC | 11:08 | |
openstackgerrit | Dmitriy Ukhlov proposed stackforge/magnetodb: (DRAFT)Add cassandra custom secondary index to code base https://review.openstack.org/107500 | 12:02 |
---|---|---|
*** rushiagr is now known as rushiagr_away | 12:15 | |
*** rushiagr_away is now known as rushiagr | 12:46 | |
openstackgerrit | Ilya Sviridov proposed stackforge/magnetodb: Cleaning up C* on unstack.sh https://review.openstack.org/135593 | 12:55 |
isviridov | Hello everybody | 13:30 |
isviridov | Just a remind we have a weekly meeting in 30 mins | 13:30 |
isviridov | Here it agenda https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/MagnetoDB/WeeklyMeetingAgenda#Nov_20.2C_2014.2C_14:00_UTC | 13:30 |
*** k4n0 has quit IRC | 13:38 | |
*** keith_newstadt has joined #magnetodb | 13:43 | |
*** miqui has joined #magnetodb | 13:46 | |
*** nunosantos has joined #magnetodb | 13:49 | |
*** miqui_ has joined #magnetodb | 13:50 | |
*** keith_newstadt has quit IRC | 13:50 | |
*** keith_newstadt has joined #magnetodb | 13:51 | |
*** miqui__ has joined #magnetodb | 13:52 | |
*** ajayaa has quit IRC | 13:53 | |
*** miqui___ has joined #magnetodb | 13:54 | |
*** achuprin_ has joined #magnetodb | 13:54 | |
isviridov | miqui_ : miqui__ miqui miqui___ hello | 13:54 |
* isviridov a lot of clients | 13:55 | |
*** miqui____ has joined #magnetodb | 13:55 | |
*** miqui_____ has joined #magnetodb | 13:55 | |
nunosantos | isviridov: you spoke too soon ;-) | 13:56 |
*** miqui___ has quit IRC | 13:56 | |
*** miqui___ has joined #magnetodb | 13:57 | |
achuprin_ | Hi team! | 13:57 |
isviridov | achuprin : hello | 13:58 |
*** miqui__ has quit IRC | 13:58 | |
*** miqui has quit IRC | 13:58 | |
*** miqui____ has quit IRC | 13:58 | |
*** miqui_ has quit IRC | 13:58 | |
*** miqui___ has quit IRC | 13:58 | |
*** rushiagr is now known as rushiagr_away | 13:59 | |
*** miqui has joined #magnetodb | 13:59 | |
ikhudoshyn | o/ | 14:00 |
isviridov | #startmeeting magnetodb | 14:00 |
openstack | Meeting started Thu Nov 20 14:00:30 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is isviridov. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 14:00 |
openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 14:00 |
openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'magnetodb' | 14:00 |
isviridov | Hello everybody | 14:00 |
nunosantos | o/ | 14:00 |
isviridov | nunosantos : o/ | 14:01 |
dukhlov | _o/ | 14:01 |
achuprin_ | o/ | 14:01 |
isviridov | miqui : miqui_____ welcome to mdb weekly meeting | 14:01 |
ikhudoshyn | dukhlov works as a traffic regulator | 14:01 |
dukhlov | _o_| | 14:02 |
miqui_____ | hello | 14:02 |
miqui_____ | sorry had some irc client uissues on my side.. | 14:02 |
isviridov | miqui_____ : have we meet each other on summit? | 14:02 |
miqui_____ | i was in april 2014 atlanta summit | 14:02 |
isviridov | Today agenda #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/MagnetoDB/WeeklyMeetingAgenda#Agenda | 14:03 |
miqui_____ | your nick seems familiar somehow.. | 14:03 |
isviridov | miqui_____ : welcome back if so :) | 14:03 |
miqui_____ | ..thanks... | 14:03 |
isviridov | Let us start from action items | 14:04 |
isviridov | #topic Go through action items isviridov | 14:04 |
isviridov | #link http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/isviridov/2014/isviridov.2014-11-13-14.01.html | 14:04 |
isviridov | ACTION: dukhlov data encryption support blueprint | 14:04 |
dukhlov | hm | 14:05 |
* isviridov good start | 14:05 | |
dukhlov | specification for this blueprint is under review now | 14:05 |
isviridov | #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/134936/ | 14:06 |
isviridov | #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/133505/ | 14:06 |
dukhlov | I got -1 from isviridov, but there were only grammar mistakes | 14:06 |
*** ajayaa has joined #magnetodb | 14:06 | |
dukhlov | I'm waiting for other feedback | 14:07 |
*** rushiagr_away is now known as rushiagr | 14:07 | |
isviridov | dukhlov : I was a bit surprised that we have the general one. I mean - Specification for data-encryption-support. Do you think we need it? | 14:07 |
*** charlesw has joined #magnetodb | 14:08 | |
isviridov | charlesw : hello | 14:09 |
dukhlov | ok, for encryption support we need to have implemented at least part of management API | 14:09 |
charlesw | Hi | 14:09 |
rushiagr | o/ | 14:09 |
isviridov | hi rushiagr | 14:09 |
ajayaa | Hi everyone. | 14:09 |
isviridov | hello ajayaa | 14:10 |
dukhlov | so I added sub smaller blueprint - part of management API for encryption and set it as dependency for encryption support blueprint | 14:10 |
isviridov | charlesw : rushiagr ajayaa discussing https://review.openstack.org/#/c/134936/ | 14:11 |
isviridov | dukhlov : ok. I think we have to link them during merge | 14:11 |
isviridov | dukhlov : great job! | 14:12 |
dukhlov | as you wish | 14:12 |
isviridov | Ok, let us move to next item | 14:12 |
isviridov | ACTION: ikhudoshyn file a bug about dynamodb version support documentation | 14:12 |
ikhudoshyn | done | 14:12 |
ikhudoshyn | https://bugs.launchpad.net/magnetodb/+bug/1394575 | 14:13 |
isviridov | ikhudoshyn : yes, I've seen. Great | 14:13 |
isviridov | Ok, we have 2 other topics to discuss | 14:14 |
isviridov | ACTION: keith_newstadt isviridov ikhudoshyn clarify if we can avoid having two different apis for db backup/restore inside of openstack | 14:14 |
*** miqui has quit IRC | 14:14 | |
isviridov | ACTION: keith_newstadt isviridov ikhudoshyn clarify if we can avoid having two different implementations of that api | 14:14 |
*** miqui has joined #magnetodb | 14:14 | |
isviridov | Let us do it together with bp discussion | 14:14 |
ominakov | sorry guys, i'm late | 14:14 |
isviridov | #topic Discuss Backup/restore API specification draft https://review.openstack.org/#/c/133933/ ikhudoshyn | 14:15 |
*** miqui_ has joined #magnetodb | 14:15 | |
ikhudoshyn | it hangs for couple weeks yet | 14:15 |
ikhudoshyn | only small amount of comments arise | 14:15 |
ikhudoshyn | i tried to address all of them | 14:16 |
isviridov | #link http://docs-draft.openstack.org/33/133933/12/check/gate-magnetodb-specs-docs/e0b7b92/doc/build/html/specs/kilo/approved/backup-restore-api.html for easier reading | 14:16 |
*** miqui_ has quit IRC | 14:17 | |
ajayaa | isviridov, that is helpful. | 14:17 |
*** keith_newstadt has quit IRC | 14:17 | |
*** keith_newstadt has joined #magnetodb | 14:17 | |
charlesw | during backup/restore, shouldn't the tenant/table be locked? | 14:18 |
ikhudoshyn | we don't see any general reason | 14:19 |
ikhudoshyn | it may still be required for some implementations of backup | 14:19 |
ikhudoshyn | some of us thought about exporting data in json format as the 1st approach | 14:20 |
ikhudoshyn | we dont seem to need any loking in that case | 14:20 |
ikhudoshyn | * locking | 14:20 |
isviridov | ikhudoshyn : but, I believe, all others will need it and it affects usage scenario. Do you think that we have to describe teh locking process within this spec? | 14:22 |
ikhudoshyn | not in *that* spec since it only describes API | 14:22 |
ikhudoshyn | i'd prefer not to manage table/tenant locking manually | 14:23 |
charlesw | We should document it so we can manage user expectations whether locking is used or not | 14:23 |
ikhudoshyn | charlesw: somewhere.. | 14:24 |
charlesw | ok, preferably at API level | 14:24 |
isviridov | ikhudoshyn: as API Impact section if any is expected | 14:25 |
ikhudoshyn | as I said i'd rather not to lock it manually -- so we could just add new tables status, like MAINTENANCE | 14:25 |
ajayaa | ikhudoshyn, +1 | 14:27 |
charlesw | +1 | 14:27 |
isviridov | ikhudoshyn : does it mean the users requests will be rejected if table is in this status? | 14:27 |
miqui_____ | ..that would de3pend of the use case.. | 14:28 |
ikhudoshyn | yep.. i thought about 403 | 14:28 |
ikhudoshyn | guess there should be more suitable err code | 14:28 |
miqui_____ | 1 - hey here your latest snapshot http 200 | 14:28 |
miqui_____ | 2 - or simply 403 | 14:28 |
ikhudoshyn | not sure latest snapshot is always available | 14:28 |
isviridov | ikhudoshyn +1, also for writing as well | 14:29 |
charlesw | 503 Service Unavailable may be more appropriate | 14:29 |
miqui_____ | hmm good point...if that is the case then 503 | 14:29 |
ikhudoshyn | charlesw: we might think more.. | 14:30 |
ikhudoshyn | actually it is not the whole service that is unavailable.. | 14:30 |
isviridov | #idea we could just add new tables status, like MAINTENANCE | 14:30 |
ajayaa | 423 Locked | 14:30 |
ajayaa | ? | 14:30 |
ikhudoshyn | ajayaa: exactly | 14:31 |
ikhudoshyn | tnx | 14:31 |
isviridov | #idea 423 Locked on request during backup | 14:31 |
ikhudoshyn | * when in MAINTENANCE status | 14:31 |
ikhudoshyn | not necessary for every backup | 14:32 |
isviridov | ikhudoshyn : +1 | 14:32 |
isviridov | ikhudoshyn : charlesw ajayaa miqui_____ move on? | 14:33 |
ajayaa | +1 | 14:33 |
ikhudoshyn | agree, I'm just waiting for yr +/1's | 14:33 |
ikhudoshyn | * +/-1's | 14:33 |
isviridov | ikhudoshyn : you will have it :) | 14:34 |
isviridov | #topic Open discussion isviridov | 14:34 |
ajayaa | Code review: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/124391/ | 14:34 |
ajayaa | *needed | 14:34 |
isviridov | spec #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/MagnetoDB/specs/rbac | 14:35 |
isviridov | ajayaa : great progress! | 14:36 |
isviridov | #action dukhlov charlesw ikhudoshyn isviridov review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/124391/ | 14:36 |
miqui_____ | for my part... am new to the project.. | 14:37 |
isviridov | ajayaa : I just don't remember if we have finished with a spec | 14:37 |
miqui_____ | so am going through the bugs and see where i can start | 14:37 |
ajayaa | isviridov, This was before we had a spec system in place. :) | 14:38 |
isviridov | miqui_____ : welcome on board! | 14:38 |
miqui_____ | ...thanks!! | 14:38 |
ajayaa | But the wiki page is informative enough I guess. | 14:39 |
isviridov | miqui_____ : pay attention to https://bugs.launchpad.net/magnetodb/+bugs?field.tag=low-hanging-fruit and https://launchpad.net/magnetodb/+milestone/kilo-1 bugs | 14:39 |
miqui_____ | awesome... thanks... | 14:39 |
isviridov | miqui_____ : looking for your patches. Always feel free to ask. | 14:39 |
isviridov | miqui_____ : what is your timezone? | 14:40 |
miqui_____ | EST | 14:40 |
miqui_____ | EST ( US east coast) | 14:40 |
isviridov | ajayaa : yeap, let me look at it. I believe we will add monitoring action at least. | 14:41 |
charlesw | @miqui, welcome, we are in same tz | 14:41 |
miqui_____ | cool... | 14:41 |
ajayaa | isviridov, I didn't get you. | 14:41 |
isviridov | ajayaa : there is a list of apis to restict, and we have monitoring api now | 14:43 |
ajayaa | isviridov, got you! okay. | 14:43 |
isviridov | ajayaa : anyhow great spec! | 14:43 |
ajayaa | isviridov, We can add it later by filing a bug and then fixing it. | 14:43 |
isviridov | Yeap | 14:44 |
isviridov | Team, anything else to discuss now? | 14:45 |
isviridov | Seems we are done | 14:46 |
ikhudoshyn | looks like | 14:46 |
charlesw | I have a spec WIP, not ready yet. But I'd like to hear your use cases and comments. https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/MagnetoDB/specs/requestmetrics | 14:46 |
isviridov | charlesw : the first q why not in spec repo? | 14:47 |
isviridov | #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/MagnetoDB/specs/requestmetrics | 14:48 |
charlesw | @isviridov, can you educate us on the process? | 14:48 |
ikhudoshyn | the same as with our usual repo | 14:48 |
ikhudoshyn | but magnetodb-specs | 14:49 |
ikhudoshyn | git clone, branch, set up git-review, commit, git review | 14:49 |
isviridov | charlesw : I've seen something similar in swift. So, actually it is one more monitoring | 14:49 |
charlesw | I was using our wiki template: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/MagnetoDB/specs/template | 14:50 |
*** keith_newstadt has quit IRC | 14:51 | |
*** keith_newstadt has joined #magnetodb | 14:51 | |
isviridov | charlesw : why not put it as a part of monitoring api? | 14:51 |
charlesw | I looked at swift as well they have 3 different ways: recon, informant, and statsd w/o middleware | 14:52 |
charlesw | we don't need an API for monitoring. We can publish it thru statsd/graphite/ganglia/etc | 14:53 |
charlesw | similar to swift | 14:53 |
isviridov | charlesw : yes we can, but in such case we are loosing this information for celiometer | 14:53 |
isviridov | charlesw : what do you think? | 14:54 |
charlesw | right, there are some areas unclear like whether to use/work with ceilometer | 14:54 |
charlesw | that's the kind of comments I'd like to hear more:) | 14:55 |
isviridov | Ok, I think that would be greate to keep it under Monitoring API as one source of cluster metrics. And call it via any monitoring solutions like nagios so on. | 14:56 |
miqui_____ | ..even sensuapp | 14:56 |
isviridov | charlesw : how fast do you need it? | 14:57 |
charlesw | @isviridov, I'll think about it. Thanks for comments. | 14:58 |
charlesw | probably the week after thanksgiving | 14:58 |
isviridov | Another approach can be just implement it for statsd as it is easier and faster, and move to Monitoring API just solution is more or less machure. | 14:58 |
charlesw | the overhead/perf impact can be big | 14:59 |
isviridov | With Monitoring API we have to implement own storage to keep data about every node | 14:59 |
*** miqui has quit IRC | 15:00 | |
isviridov | charlesw : what performance impact do you mean? | 15:00 |
* isviridov time is over | 15:00 | |
charlesw | we need to capture metrics for every request. For statsd, just udp post can be done. | 15:00 |
charlesw | got to go, have another meeting | 15:00 |
isviridov | charlesw : but data can be cashed and agregted in memory | 15:01 |
isviridov | charlesw : sure | 15:01 |
isviridov | Thank you everybody for comming | 15:01 |
isviridov | #endmeeting | 15:01 |
openstack | Meeting ended Thu Nov 20 15:01:39 2014 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 15:01 |
openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/magnetodb/2014/magnetodb.2014-11-20-14.00.html | 15:01 |
openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/magnetodb/2014/magnetodb.2014-11-20-14.00.txt | 15:01 |
openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/magnetodb/2014/magnetodb.2014-11-20-14.00.log.html | 15:01 |
*** nunosantos has quit IRC | 15:02 | |
*** isviridov is now known as isviridov_away | 15:05 | |
*** miqui has joined #magnetodb | 15:05 | |
*** miqui_____ has quit IRC | 15:18 | |
*** miqui_ has joined #magnetodb | 15:22 | |
*** vivekd has quit IRC | 15:25 | |
*** miqui has quit IRC | 15:25 | |
*** miqui has joined #magnetodb | 15:31 | |
*** miqui has quit IRC | 15:32 | |
*** miqui has joined #magnetodb | 15:34 | |
*** miqui has quit IRC | 15:35 | |
*** miqui has joined #magnetodb | 15:44 | |
*** keith_newstadt has quit IRC | 16:09 | |
*** achuprin_ has quit IRC | 16:12 | |
*** keith_newstadt has joined #magnetodb | 16:17 | |
*** achuprin_ has joined #magnetodb | 16:27 | |
*** vnaboychenko has joined #magnetodb | 16:33 | |
openstackgerrit | Merged stackforge/magnetodb: Cleaning up C* on unstack.sh https://review.openstack.org/135593 | 16:37 |
*** vnaboych_ has joined #magnetodb | 16:45 | |
*** vnaboychenko has quit IRC | 16:45 | |
*** keith_newstadt has quit IRC | 17:01 | |
openstackgerrit | Chao Li proposed stackforge/magnetodb: Add validation for the hash and range key https://review.openstack.org/136059 | 17:04 |
*** nunosantos has joined #magnetodb | 17:08 | |
*** Viswanath has joined #magnetodb | 17:24 | |
*** Viswanath has quit IRC | 17:27 | |
*** romainh has quit IRC | 17:27 | |
*** vnaboych_ has quit IRC | 17:35 | |
*** vnaboychenko has joined #magnetodb | 17:52 | |
*** vnaboych_ has joined #magnetodb | 17:52 | |
*** vnaboychenko has quit IRC | 17:52 | |
*** ajayaa has quit IRC | 18:41 | |
*** keith_newstadt has joined #magnetodb | 18:41 | |
*** rushiagr is now known as rushiagr_away | 18:45 | |
*** Viswanath has joined #magnetodb | 19:00 | |
*** Viswanath has quit IRC | 19:07 | |
*** keith_newstadt has quit IRC | 20:10 | |
*** keith_newstadt has joined #magnetodb | 20:19 | |
openstackgerrit | Chao Li proposed stackforge/magnetodb: Add validation for the hash and range key https://review.openstack.org/132871 | 20:58 |
*** nunosantos has quit IRC | 21:55 | |
*** denis_makogon has quit IRC | 22:08 | |
*** dmakogon_ has joined #magnetodb | 22:09 | |
openstackgerrit | Chao Li proposed stackforge/magnetodb: Add validation for the hash and range key some previous bug fixed https://review.openstack.org/132871 | 22:10 |
*** keith_newstadt has quit IRC | 23:05 | |
openstackgerrit | Chao Li proposed stackforge/magnetodb: Add validation for the hash and range key https://review.openstack.org/132871 | 23:17 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!