Tuesday, 2018-11-27

*** tosky has quit IRC00:16
hubbot1FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-fedora-28-standalone @ https://review.openstack.org/604298, master: tripleo-ci-fedora-28-standalone @ https://review.openstack.org/560445, stable/queens: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario008-multinode-oooq-container @ https://review.openstack.org/56722401:51
*** agopi has joined #oooq02:49
*** dsneddon has quit IRC03:24
hubbot1FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-fedora-28-standalone @ https://review.openstack.org/604298, master: tripleo-ci-fedora-28-standalone @ https://review.openstack.org/560445, stable/queens: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario008-multinode-oooq-container @ https://review.openstack.org/56722403:51
*** dsneddon has joined #oooq03:51
*** udesale has joined #oooq03:54
*** dsneddon has quit IRC03:56
*** ykarel|away has joined #oooq03:57
*** ykarel|away is now known as ykarel04:06
*** udesale has quit IRC04:31
*** ykarel has quit IRC04:46
*** dsneddon has joined #oooq04:46
*** dsneddon has quit IRC04:56
*** dsneddon has joined #oooq05:01
*** ykarel has joined #oooq05:03
*** dsneddon has quit IRC05:06
*** chandan_kumar has joined #oooq05:26
*** chandan_kumar is now known as chkumar|ruck05:28
*** dsneddon has joined #oooq05:31
*** ratailor has joined #oooq05:39
*** dsneddon has quit IRC05:41
hubbot1FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-fedora-28-standalone @ https://review.openstack.org/604298, master: tripleo-ci-fedora-28-standalone @ https://review.openstack.org/560445, stable/queens: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario008-multinode-oooq-container @ https://review.openstack.org/56722405:51
*** ccamacho has quit IRC06:30
*** dsneddon has joined #oooq06:37
*** dsneddon has quit IRC06:42
*** dsneddon has joined #oooq07:05
*** jfrancoa has joined #oooq07:06
*** kopecmartin|off is now known as kopecmartin07:26
*** quiquell has joined #oooq07:33
*** ykarel is now known as ykarel|lunch07:35
hubbot1FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-fedora-28-standalone @ https://review.openstack.org/604298, master: tripleo-ci-fedora-28-standalone @ https://review.openstack.org/560445, stable/queens: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario008-multinode-oooq-container @ https://review.openstack.org/56722407:51
*** ccamacho has joined #oooq07:56
*** saneax has joined #oooq08:03
*** gkadam has joined #oooq08:08
quiquellmarios: Good morning08:15
chkumar|ruckquiquell: marios \o/08:15
quiquellchkumar|ruck: o/08:15
marioso/ good morning folks08:16
*** jtomasek has joined #oooq08:23
*** dsneddon has quit IRC08:23
*** ykarel|lunch is now known as ykarel08:32
*** tosky has joined #oooq08:38
*** dsneddon has joined #oooq08:47
*** amoralej|off is now known as amoralej09:01
*** udesale has joined #oooq09:09
*** holser_ has joined #oooq09:09
*** holser_ has quit IRC09:10
*** holser_ has joined #oooq09:10
*** ccamacho has quit IRC09:20
*** bogdando has joined #oooq09:23
*** skramaja has joined #oooq09:30
*** ccamacho has joined #oooq09:30
*** derekh has joined #oooq09:40
hubbot1FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-fedora-28-standalone @ https://review.openstack.org/604298, master: tripleo-ci-fedora-28-standalone @ https://review.openstack.org/560445, stable/queens: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario008-multinode-oooq-container @ https://review.openstack.org/56722409:51
*** dsneddon has quit IRC09:54
mariosquiquell: o/ are you already looking at client fix for scenario ... about to fire up vim10:13
quiquellmarios: Yep, fixing unit testing both issues at scenarios and f2810:17
mariosquiquell: ok cool (for module path i mean right?)10:19
mariosis it also an issue for f28 then sounds like?10:19
quiquellmarios: f28 is different one but affects tripleoclient  too10:19
*** udesale has quit IRC10:33
*** udesale has joined #oooq10:34
*** udesale has quit IRC10:39
*** dsneddon has joined #oooq10:47
*** dsneddon has quit IRC10:59
*** udesale has joined #oooq11:06
*** holser_ is now known as holser|lunch11:07
*** dsneddon has joined #oooq11:30
*** chkumar|ruck is now known as chkumar|away11:32
*** dsneddon has quit IRC11:36
*** udesale has quit IRC11:38
*** udesale has joined #oooq11:45
*** rfolco is now known as rfolco_doctor11:45
*** udesale has quit IRC11:45
*** udesale has joined #oooq11:46
hubbot1FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-fedora-28-standalone @ https://review.openstack.org/604298, master: tripleo-ci-fedora-28-standalone @ https://review.openstack.org/560445, stable/queens: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario008-multinode-oooq-container @ https://review.openstack.org/567224, stable/rocky: tripleo-ci-centos-7-undercloud-oooq @ https://review.openstack.org/60429311:51
*** udesale has quit IRC11:52
*** udesale has joined #oooq11:53
*** ratailor has quit IRC11:53
panda|roverykarel:11:58
ykarelpanda|rover, ?12:00
*** amoralej is now known as amoralej|lunch12:04
panda|roverykarel: I think we are ok merging https://review.openstack.org/61866912:05
panda|roverykarel: wait12:06
ykarelwill cover undercloud logs missing when timeout in run seperately?12:06
panda|roverykarel: do you ever feel like you're telling something stupid while you're telling it ? :)12:07
panda|roverykarel: I was about to say "In rdocloud we can easily increase the timeout to solve this problem"12:07
panda|roverykarel: of course what about when the timeout is just the process taht hands and will never return12:08
panda|roverhangs*12:08
ykarelpanda|rover, yup i feel sometimes i am not explaining correctly :)12:08
ykarelpanda|rover, so example of timeout: overcloud-prep-images stuck12:09
ykareland job times out in run12:09
*** dsneddon has joined #oooq12:09
panda|roveryes, you can increase the timeout all you want, you'll never get any logs12:09
ykarelbut increasing timeout will not help in this case afaiu12:10
panda|roverok, let's do this for now12:11
panda|roverto get overcloud we need a timeout mechanism for the whole run playbook, that really complicated12:11
panda|roverwe can check for the existence of /logs/undercloud directory, if it doesn't exist we run collect logs12:12
*** ccamacho has quit IRC12:12
ykarel+1 but this needs an extra check, if we rename we can save that check as in post we are checking for script12:13
panda|roverto collect the overcloud , I really don't know, we use a mix of ansible and bash, our best chance is to get rid of the te-broker ...12:13
panda|roverand let the undercloud control WHEN to delete the overcloud nodes.12:13
panda|roverthe only timeout mechanism I know in ansible is the async, but task based, not role or playbook based12:14
panda|roverykarel: why checkong for /logs/undercloud is not enough ?12:15
*** holser|lunch is now known as holser_12:15
panda|roverwe are checing the artifact taht collect logs is supposed to create12:15
panda|roverand we always have at least the undercloud12:15
ykarelpanda|rover, that would work, i only said in post u need to add a condition for that12:15
panda|roveryep12:16
panda|rovernes patchset coming12:16
ykarelack12:16
*** udesale has quit IRC12:20
panda|roverykarel: updated12:25
bogdandohi folks. Any chances to have anything of https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:localcon+(status:open+OR+status:merged) in?12:25
bogdandolong running topic so far :/12:25
panda|roverbogdando: hi, do you involve directly people on our team for this topic ?12:28
panda|roverbogdando: it would be usefult to come to the community meeting to get more attention12:28
ykarelpanda|rover, ack12:28
*** udesale has joined #oooq12:32
*** udesale has quit IRC12:32
*** udesale has joined #oooq12:34
*** ccamacho has joined #oooq12:41
*** ykarel is now known as ykarel|away12:42
*** jfrancoa has quit IRC12:46
*** trown has quit IRC12:51
*** trown|brb has joined #oooq12:53
*** udesale has quit IRC12:54
*** ykarel|away has quit IRC12:56
*** jfrancoa has joined #oooq12:59
arxcruzneed to solve some problems with my daughter, brb13:00
*** arxcruz is now known as arxcruz|brb13:00
*** ccamacho has quit IRC13:04
*** ccamacho has joined #oooq13:04
*** amoralej|lunch is now known as amoralej13:06
*** rlandy has joined #oooq13:28
*** ykarel|away has joined #oooq13:28
*** trown|brb is now known as trown13:45
hubbot1FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-fedora-28-standalone @ https://review.openstack.org/604298, master: tripleo-ci-fedora-28-standalone @ https://review.openstack.org/560445, stable/queens: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario008-multinode-oooq-container @ https://review.openstack.org/567224, stable/rocky: tripleo-ci-centos-7-undercloud-oooq @ https://review.openstack.org/60429313:51
honzaI'm getting a python 3 syntax error when using reproducer, ie "SyntaxError: Missing parentheses in call to 'print'"13:53
honzaAnyone seen that?13:53
honzaIt's a fairly recent script13:53
honzaI tried changing the venv to use python3 but that didn't help13:53
*** udesale has joined #oooq13:56
honzaHere is a bug for it https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/180544014:04
openstackLaunchpad bug 1805440 in tripleo "reproducer script throws a SyntaxError (python 3)" [High,Triaged]14:04
*** udesale has quit IRC14:05
*** udesale has joined #oooq14:05
*** ykarel|away has quit IRC14:16
*** saneax has quit IRC14:27
*** gkadam has quit IRC14:52
*** rfolco_doctor is now known as rfolco14:53
*** skramaja has quit IRC15:13
weshayrfolco, please continue the call w/o me15:31
weshayI have to drop15:31
rfolcoweshay, ack15:31
rfolcoo/15:31
weshaythe call should stay up15:32
weshayrfolco, still ok?15:32
rfolcoweshay, me?15:32
weshayrfolco, the bluejeans15:32
rfolcoah yes15:32
rfolcostill up15:32
rfolcoweshay, :)15:33
*** ykarel|away has joined #oooq15:36
hubbot1FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-fedora-28-standalone @ https://review.openstack.org/604298, master: tripleo-ci-fedora-28-standalone @ https://review.openstack.org/560445, stable/queens: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario008-multinode-oooq-container @ https://review.openstack.org/567224, stable/rocky: tripleo-ci-centos-7-undercloud-oooq @ https://review.openstack.org/60429315:51
*** dtrainor__ is now known as dtrainor15:52
*** quiquell is now known as quiquell|off15:54
rlandyweshay"have you responded to any of the emails regarding upshift consolidation?15:54
rlandyweshay: I haven't responded yet but will do so if you have not15:55
weshayI haven't15:56
*** udesale has quit IRC15:56
*** udesale has joined #oooq15:57
*** udesale has quit IRC15:58
*** apetrich has quit IRC16:28
*** jfrancoa has quit IRC16:28
*** apetrich has joined #oooq16:42
*** agopi is now known as agopi|food_run16:49
*** arxcruz|brb is now known as arxcruz16:54
rfolcorlandy, ping17:03
*** sshnaidm|afk is now known as sshnaidm17:08
*** bogdando has quit IRC17:08
arxcruzrlandy: hi, you ping me a few days ago, it was late here, then you get on pto, me too... do you remember what was ?17:13
arxcruzhehehehehe17:13
rlandyarxcruz: not really17:14
rlandyI hardly remember what happened yesterday17:14
rlandyrfolco: hello17:14
arxcruzI hardly remember what i did in the morning lol17:14
rfolcorlandy, just checking if anything changed since yesterday or instructions are still valid. I had a hard stop and some doctor appt. this morning.17:15
rfolcorlandy, 616993 is PS 31 now, anythng else ?17:15
rlandyrfolco: no point in testing those reviews17:17
rlandymy understanding from today's meeting is that we are scrapping that work17:17
rlandyto go with the zuul solution17:17
rlandyweshay: ^6 correct me if I am wrong17:18
rlandyI am planning to abandon those reviews at sprint end17:18
rfolcorlandy, zuul solution is docker compose ?17:18
rlandyyes17:18
rfolcoI thought infra folks told us to NOT do that17:19
weshayrlandy, rfolco quiquell|off I think what we are saying is that rlandy and quiquell|off are going to spend next sprint exploring the zuul container and will report back on how we should proceed17:19
panda|roverrfolco: this is something that we have to verify before anything else17:22
rfolcoyeah thats my point, we did not have any design or pre-design discussion on that17:23
rlandysshnaidm: did you have any luck with the 'zuul-in-a-box' and running with review.rdoproject repos?17:23
rlandyhow did you work with ovb?17:23
sshnaidmrlandy, not really, still working on this17:23
*** derekh has quit IRC17:23
rlandyrun stack-create or set up te-broker?17:23
rlandysshnaidm: ^^?17:23
rlandysshnaidm: are you using the upshift tenant at all?17:25
sshnaidmrlandy, I'm going to try with osb-stack-manage role firstly17:25
sshnaidmrlandy, not yet using upshift, need to have this working before using this tenant17:26
rlandysshnaidm: ack ok - but you still want to use the tenant17:26
sshnaidmrlandy, but problems are yet before running ovb-manage role17:27
sshnaidmrlandy, yeah, right17:27
rlandyit's all yours - I am just responding to infra about our usage and quotas17:27
rlandyI wanted to check what was in use17:27
rlandysshnaidm: I can imagine that working with the rdoproject repos is not so simple17:28
*** ykarel|away has quit IRC17:28
*** apetrich has quit IRC17:30
*** agopi|food_run is now known as agopi17:41
*** trown is now known as trown|lunch17:42
*** apetrich has joined #oooq17:50
hubbot1FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-fedora-28-standalone @ https://review.openstack.org/604298, master: tripleo-ci-fedora-28-standalone @ https://review.openstack.org/560445, stable/queens: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario008-multinode-oooq-container @ https://review.openstack.org/567224, stable/rocky: tripleo-ci-centos-7-undercloud-oooq @ https://review.openstack.org/60429317:51
weshaypanda|rover, rfolco fyi http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/cr/x86_64/Packages/18:01
weshaypanda|rover, rfolco we need this work handed off to the next ruck/rover18:02
weshaypanda|rover++18:02
hubbot1weshay: panda|rover's karma is now 418:02
weshayhttp://logs.openstack.org/80/618780/7/check/tripleo-ci-centos-7-nextrelease-standalone/0ea9ede/logs/undercloud/home/zuul/repo_setup.log.txt.gz#_2018-11-19_21_24_2918:02
panda|roverI think we solved that, apevec suggested the full combination of repos18:04
panda|roverthat is CR on top of everything else18:05
weshaycool, panda|rover thank you so much for watching that18:07
weshaypanda|rover, def.. need to hand off to $next18:07
*** jtomasek has quit IRC18:12
*** kopecmartin is now known as kopecmartin|off18:16
*** ykarel|away has joined #oooq18:27
*** rlandy is now known as rlandy|brb18:28
*** amoralej is now known as amoralej|off18:34
weshaypanda|rover, question about http://logs.openstack.org/80/618780/8/check/tripleo-ci-centos-7-nextrelease-standalone/39712c5/logs/undercloud/etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-CR.repo.txt.gz18:35
panda|rovermmmh18:36
panda|rovershoot18:37
*** dougbtv has joined #oooq18:48
*** ykarel|away has quit IRC18:56
*** trown|lunch is now known as trown18:58
*** vinaykns has joined #oooq19:06
*** rlandy|brb is now known as rlandy19:09
*** holser_ has quit IRC19:24
weshaypanda|rover, my fault http://logs.openstack.org/80/618780/8/check/tripleo-ci-centos-7-nextrelease-standalone/39712c5/logs/undercloud/etc/yum.repos.d/quickstart-centos-cr.repo.txt.gz19:31
rlandyweshay: do we have a team mailing list?19:35
rlandyneeded for the upshift service account19:35
weshayrlandy, depends on the subject19:35
weshayah19:35
weshayno.. not for internal stuff19:35
rlandyweshay: forwraded you an email19:37
rlandypls see request for address19:37
rlandyweshay: pls advise19:39
hubbot1FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-fedora-28-standalone @ https://review.openstack.org/604298, master: tripleo-ci-fedora-28-standalone @ https://review.openstack.org/560445, stable/queens: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario008-multinode-oooq-container @ https://review.openstack.org/567224, stable/rocky: tripleo-ci-centos-7-undercloud-oooq @ https://review.openstack.org/60429319:51
*** jtomasek has joined #oooq20:17
*** jrist has quit IRC20:22
*** jtomasek has quit IRC20:45
*** jrist has joined #oooq21:15
*** trown is now known as trown|outtypewww21:49
hubbot1FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-fedora-28-standalone @ https://review.openstack.org/604298, stable/pike: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario004-multinode-oooq-container @ https://review.openstack.org/602248, master: tripleo-ci-fedora-28-standalone @ https://review.openstack.org/560445, stable/queens: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario008-multinode-oooq-container @ https://review.openstack.org/567224, stable/rocky:  (1 more message)21:51
rlandyweshay: rascasoft's meeting for pidone lab transfer is in the middle of sprint planing:(21:53
rlandyimportant to attend this meeting?21:53
weshaylab transfer?21:53
* weshay looks21:53
weshayrlandy, I see it21:54
weshayrlandy, ya.. let's plan to attend that21:54
rlandylab info transfer21:54
rlandyweshay: ack ok21:54
weshayrlandy, I suspect planning will be short21:54
weshayonly thing we're adding is f28 promotion jobs21:55
rlandyweshay: lastly your slave was offline  - cleaned it up and it's back for bm jobs21:55
weshayrlandy, so Chris and I are going to present that bm plan on thrs of next week21:55
rlandyok - coll21:55
rlandycool21:55
weshayso I suspect early next year.. we'll be revamping those jobs21:56
weshaypretty much to just report on tripleo-ci-testing21:56
rlandysure - that's fine21:56
weshaybut we may have some work to do to get make sure others know how to use those21:56
rlandyjust taking a day to clean this up that I neglected before next sprint starts21:57
weshaywe'll see what happens21:57
weshayI don't want to change anything until others have weighed in21:57
weshayk k21:57
weshaynote:  http://rhos-release.virt.bos.redhat.com:3030/rhosp rdo phase 2 is gone21:57
rlandynice21:57
rlandymay it rest in peace21:57
weshayheh21:58
weshayno doubt21:58
*** saneax has joined #oooq22:15
*** saneax has quit IRC22:50
*** vinaykns has quit IRC22:55
*** rlandy has quit IRC23:27
hubbot1FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-fedora-28-standalone @ https://review.openstack.org/604298, stable/pike: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario004-multinode-oooq-container @ https://review.openstack.org/602248, master: tripleo-ci-fedora-28-standalone @ https://review.openstack.org/560445, stable/queens: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario008-multinode-oooq-container @ https://review.openstack.org/567224, stable/rocky:  (1 more message)23:52

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!