*** tosky has quit IRC | 00:27 | |
hubbot1 | FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-fedora-28-standalone @ https://review.openstack.org/604298, master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario003-multinode-oooq-container, tripleo-ci-fedora-28-standalone @ https://review.openstack.org/560445, stable/ocata: tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001 @ https://review.openstack.org/564291 | 01:56 |
---|---|---|
*** agopi has quit IRC | 02:04 | |
*** agopi has joined #oooq | 02:13 | |
*** rlandy has quit IRC | 02:40 | |
*** dsneddon has quit IRC | 03:48 | |
hubbot1 | FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-fedora-28-standalone @ https://review.openstack.org/604298, master: tripleo-ci-fedora-28-standalone @ https://review.openstack.org/560445, stable/ocata: tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001 @ https://review.openstack.org/564291 | 03:56 |
*** ykarel|away has joined #oooq | 03:58 | |
*** sshnaidm is now known as sshnaidm|afk | 04:04 | |
*** ykarel|away has quit IRC | 04:24 | |
*** ykarel|away has joined #oooq | 04:25 | |
*** ykarel|away is now known as ykarel | 04:27 | |
*** ratailor has joined #oooq | 04:46 | |
*** dsneddon has joined #oooq | 04:47 | |
*** dsneddon has quit IRC | 04:52 | |
*** dsneddon has joined #oooq | 04:58 | |
*** agopi_ has joined #oooq | 05:00 | |
*** agopi has quit IRC | 05:00 | |
*** agopi__ has joined #oooq | 05:09 | |
*** agopi__ is now known as agopi | 05:10 | |
*** dsneddon has quit IRC | 05:11 | |
*** agopi_ has quit IRC | 05:12 | |
*** dsneddon has joined #oooq | 05:49 | |
hubbot1 | FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-fedora-28-standalone @ https://review.openstack.org/604298, master: tripleo-ci-fedora-28-standalone @ https://review.openstack.org/560445, stable/queens: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario003-multinode-oooq-container @ https://review.openstack.org/567224, stable/ocata: tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001 @ https://review.openstack.org/564291 | 05:56 |
*** dsneddon has quit IRC | 06:05 | |
*** apetrich has quit IRC | 06:37 | |
*** dsneddon has joined #oooq | 06:39 | |
*** quiquell|off is now known as quiquell | 06:59 | |
*** jfrancoa has joined #oooq | 07:09 | |
quiquell | marios_|ruck: Good morning sir | 07:17 |
*** dsneddon has quit IRC | 07:24 | |
*** apetrich has joined #oooq | 07:24 | |
*** ykarel_ has joined #oooq | 07:29 | |
*** ykarel has quit IRC | 07:31 | |
marios | o/ quiquell | 07:36 |
marios | scen 1/4 failed but didn't get as far as linting :/ | 07:36 |
quiquell | marios: ceph stuff merged | 07:36 |
marios | quiquell: yah saw | 07:36 |
quiquell | marios: we just miss the linting and tempest | 07:36 |
quiquell | marios: Did the ANSIBLE_LIBRARY thing works ? | 07:37 |
marios | 09:36 < marios> scen 1/4 failed but didn't get as far as linting :/ | 07:37 |
marios | http://logs.openstack.org/08/619508/10/check/tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario001-standalone/552174a/job-output.txt.gz#_2018-12-03_19_07_55_223198 | 07:37 |
marios | http://logs.openstack.org/20/619520/11/check/tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario004-standalone/d624a80/logs/undercloud/home/zuul/standalone_deploy.log.txt.gz#_2018-12-03_19_01_12 | 07:37 |
marios | quiquell: so don't know yet ... | 07:37 |
quiquell | damn... | 07:38 |
quiquell | marios: Have you checck noop no master for standalone to see if it's broken at same place ? | 07:38 |
marios | quiquell: hm scenaio 3 green | 07:38 |
quiquell | marios: with correct tempest ? | 07:38 |
marios | quiquell: dono sec trying to see if it using linting looks like (environment) | 07:39 |
quiquell | marios: "python-docker-py-1:1.10.6-7.el7.noarch conflicts with file from package python2-docker-3.3.0-1.el7.noarch" | 07:39 |
marios | http://logs.openstack.org/61/618761/10/check/tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario003-standalone/464a433/job-output.txt.gz#_2018-12-03_21_56_13_816791 | 07:39 |
marios | quiquell: so env thing looks ok i think from here | 07:39 |
quiquell | marios: looks like we are installing two RPMs y both has the same file | 07:39 |
quiquell | marios: Have to be something general at standalone | 07:40 |
quiquell | marios: do a recheck at scenario001 | 07:41 |
*** jtomasek has joined #oooq | 07:41 | |
quiquell | marios: It's totally unrelated | 07:41 |
*** jtomasek has quit IRC | 07:41 | |
marios | quiquell: ack was gona after checking reviews/digging a bit first | 07:41 |
quiquell | marios: does not worth it, scenario003 has run later on an it's working | 07:41 |
*** jtomasek has joined #oooq | 07:41 | |
quiquell | marios: something has being fix upstream | 07:41 |
marios | quiquell: ack | 07:41 |
quiquell | marios: Do scenario003 include the multinode scenario003 for tempest ? | 07:42 |
quiquell | marios: btw let's merge scenario002 env files | 07:42 |
quiquell | marios: Also ANSIBLE_LIBRARY thing | 07:42 |
marios | quiquell: needs another vote that isn't me for scen2 | 07:42 |
quiquell | marios: if scenario003 has pss it means it's working | 07:42 |
marios | quiquell: ack | 07:42 |
*** skramaja has joined #oooq | 07:43 | |
quiquell | marios: forgot to add chem to the reviews he was going to help workflow them too | 07:44 |
*** quiquell is now known as quiquell|brb | 07:50 | |
hubbot1 | FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-fedora-28-standalone @ https://review.openstack.org/604298, master: tripleo-ci-fedora-28-standalone @ https://review.openstack.org/560445, stable/queens: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario003-multinode-oooq-container @ https://review.openstack.org/567224, stable/ocata: tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001 @ https://review.openstack.org/564291 | 07:56 |
*** vinaykns has joined #oooq | 08:02 | |
chkumar|off | quiquell|brb: where is tempest one blocked? | 08:05 |
*** chkumar|off is now known as chandan_kumar | 08:05 | |
*** quiquell|brb is now known as quiquell | 08:07 | |
quiquell | chandan_kumar: Tempest looks good for new at scenarios we are just migrating stuff | 08:09 |
chandan_kumar | quiquell: cool! | 08:09 |
*** gkadam has joined #oooq | 08:22 | |
*** vinaykns has quit IRC | 08:27 | |
*** ykarel_ is now known as ykarel | 08:29 | |
*** holser_ has joined #oooq | 08:30 | |
quiquell | marios_|ruck: There is a linting problem on the ANSIBLE_LIBRARY stuff | 08:35 |
marios_|ruck | quiquell: thanks i replied will update once the current runs finish | 08:36 |
marios_|ruck | quiquell: yo dawd i heard you like linting problems so i include a lint issue so you can fix linting while youre trying to fix linting | 08:36 |
quiquell | marios_|ruck: Did you add something to your coffe today ? | 08:37 |
*** amoralej|off is now known as amoralej | 08:39 | |
marios_|ruck | quiquell: extra shot spreso | 08:42 |
*** holser_ has quit IRC | 08:46 | |
*** holser_ has joined #oooq | 08:47 | |
*** tosky has joined #oooq | 08:51 | |
*** ykarel is now known as ykarel|lunch | 08:51 | |
ssbarnea|rover | cofeee!!! | 08:53 |
quiquell | ssbarnea|rover: o/ | 08:53 |
*** agopi has quit IRC | 08:56 | |
*** agopi has joined #oooq | 08:56 | |
ssbarnea|rover | marios: we need to address the timeout one ASAP, it will bring everything down if we don't, line 41 on https://review.rdoproject.org/etherpad/p/ruckrover-sprint23#37 | 08:57 |
marios_|ruck | ssbarnea|rover: ack lets catch up in 15 mins? | 08:58 |
ssbarnea|rover | and I am afraid that we need external help on that. panda do you think you could have a look? maybe you have an idea. | 08:59 |
ssbarnea|rover | sure | 08:59 |
*** bogdando has joined #oooq | 09:04 | |
quiquell | bogdando: o/ good morning mate | 09:05 |
quiquell | bogdando: To replace multinode scenarios to standalone scenarios https://review.openstack.org/#/c/618537/ | 09:06 |
*** agopi_ has joined #oooq | 09:06 | |
*** dsneddon has joined #oooq | 09:06 | |
*** agopi has quit IRC | 09:09 | |
*** rascasoft has quit IRC | 09:09 | |
*** dsneddon has quit IRC | 09:11 | |
bogdando | quiquell: hi, yeah, that long topic is on my todo list | 09:13 |
bogdando | quiquell: where is a job example? | 09:14 |
quiquell | bogdando: Cool, we are near, scenario003 has show a green with tempest and all | 09:14 |
quiquell | bogdando: for tis env file https://review.openstack.org/#/c/618709/ | 09:14 |
bogdando | um, but it's yet passed | 09:15 |
quiquell | bogdando: deploy is success http://logs.openstack.org/09/618709/20/check/tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario002-standalone/667e316/logs/undercloud/home/zuul/standalone_deploy.log.txt.gz | 09:15 |
bogdando | ok | 09:15 |
quiquell | bogdando: we can on merging them as non-voting even if they fail, as we did with f28 | 09:15 |
quiquell | bogdando: so it's easy to put pachess and see results | 09:15 |
quiquell | bogdando: for scenario002 job tempest failing rest is passing | 09:17 |
*** agopi_ is now known as agopi | 09:22 | |
*** ykarel|lunch is now known as ykarel | 09:26 | |
*** d0ugal has quit IRC | 09:31 | |
quiquell | marios_|ruck: About f28, the tempest thing is kind of WIP, let me work it out | 09:41 |
marios_|ruck | quiquell: ack | 09:44 |
chandan_kumar | quiquell: what is blocking wip tempest patch? | 09:45 |
quiquell | chandan_kumar: working out subunit filter and stuff | 09:46 |
chandan_kumar | quiquell: ok | 09:46 |
*** kopecmartin|off is now known as kopecmartin | 09:46 | |
*** sshnaidm|afk is now known as sshnaidm | 09:46 | |
quiquell | sshnaidm: o/ | 09:48 |
sshnaidm | quiquell, hola | 09:48 |
quiquell | sshnaidm: patchset 19 (latest) have docker-compose up reproducer to wait for readiness | 09:48 |
quiquell | sshnaidm: It's in the etherpad | 09:49 |
sshnaidm | quiquell, ack | 09:50 |
*** derekh has joined #oooq | 09:51 | |
quiquell | sshnaidm: Do you need help with RDO stuff ? | 09:52 |
hubbot1 | FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-fedora-28-standalone @ https://review.openstack.org/604298, master: tripleo-ci-fedora-28-standalone @ https://review.openstack.org/560445, stable/queens: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario003-multinode-oooq-container @ https://review.openstack.org/567224, stable/ocata: tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001 @ https://review.openstack.org/564291 | 09:56 |
marios_|ruck | ssbarnea|rover: do we have a bug for the container-multinode timeout (we should file one if we don't have one | 10:03 |
ssbarnea|rover | nope, we do not. | 10:03 |
ssbarnea|rover | in fact we do have a generic timeout bug, that applies to any job | 10:03 |
ssbarnea|rover | but we cannot use that one for that fix | 10:04 |
marios_|ruck | ssbarnea|rover: nah we should file one, doing | 10:04 |
arxcruz | quiquell: https://review.openstack.org/620063 :) | 10:06 |
*** dtantsur|afk is now known as dtantsur | 10:07 | |
quiquell | arxcruz: Add the story and I will +w it | 10:08 |
arxcruz | quiquell: i would, but taiga is offline | 10:08 |
arxcruz | nevermind, seems to be back | 10:09 |
quiquell | arxcruz: ack | 10:09 |
quiquell | arxcruz: but looks good and needed | 10:09 |
sshnaidm | quiquell, tried to set up it with dmsimard yesterday and failed | 10:10 |
quiquell | sshnaidm: With our zuul thingy ? | 10:10 |
sshnaidm | quiquell, yeah | 10:11 |
quiquell | sshnaidm: do you want to look into it ? | 10:11 |
quiquell | with tmate or something ? | 10:11 |
arxcruz | nope, taiga still out | 10:11 |
quiquell | arxcruz: ack, let's merge that | 10:12 |
sshnaidm | quiquell, well, the job fails, that's the problem: http://paste.openstack.org/show/736597/ | 10:12 |
arxcruz | quiquell: The patch is already in one of rfolco cards for sure | 10:12 |
quiquell | arxcruz: workflowed let have that | 10:12 |
arxcruz | quiquell: gracias mi compaƱero | 10:13 |
quiquell | arxcruz: obrigado | 10:13 |
quiquell | sshnaidm: looks like this is the role missing https://github.com/rdo-infra/rdo-jobs/tree/master/roles/mirror-info-fork | 10:21 |
quiquell | sshnaidm: the new patchset has the config you are using ? | 10:24 |
quiquell | sshnaidm: what job were you running ? looks it's missing required-project rdo-jobs | 10:26 |
quiquell | marios_|ruck: we can workflow scenario002 env file now https://review.openstack.org/#/c/618537/ | 10:27 |
sshnaidm | quiquell, seems like it's base job config, need to add a role there, trying.. | 10:28 |
quiquell | sshnaidm: remember we still have a custom base | 10:28 |
sshnaidm | quiquell, yeah,that's the problem | 10:29 |
quiquell | sshnaidm: if we have to change bases maybe we need different tenant | 10:29 |
quiquell | sshnaidm: what's the job name ? | 10:29 |
sshnaidm | quiquell, let me try something.. | 10:29 |
sshnaidm | quiquell, did you see it? https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/17633/1 | 10:30 |
marios | ack quiquell | 10:30 |
quiquell | sshnaidm: Yep, it's great stuff | 10:30 |
quiquell | sshnaidm: We can chose this path too, start a sf with libvirt and configure stuff there | 10:31 |
quiquell | sshnaidm: Don't know if using sf add another layer of complexity | 10:31 |
quiquell | marios: Also fix sshnaidm comment on ANSIBLE_LIBRAR -> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/620556/ | 10:32 |
quiquell | marios: so we get his +2 and we can workflow that | 10:32 |
marios | ack quiquell sshnaidm will do | 10:36 |
ssbarnea|rover | panda: sshnaidm : please read https://review.openstack.org/#/c/622187/ and advise. | 10:38 |
*** holser_ is now known as holser|lunch | 10:48 | |
*** dsneddon has joined #oooq | 10:55 | |
quiquell | sshnaidm: We can workflow this https://review.openstack.org/#/c/621562/ to get tqe install right without zuul-cloner stuff, aslo I am adding to the base job | 10:58 |
*** dsneddon has quit IRC | 11:00 | |
*** vinaykns has joined #oooq | 11:17 | |
sshnaidm | quiquell, maybe worth to test it in some dummy patch | 11:20 |
sshnaidm | quiquell, what's with toci_gate_test.sh itself? do we still need it or can remove? | 11:21 |
rfolco | arxcruz, please convert the issue from last sprint to a story/task in this sprint and assign to you. | 11:22 |
quiquell | sshnaidm: old repro use it, don't know if people is using it | 11:22 |
arxcruz | rfolco: which one ? | 11:23 |
sshnaidm | quiquell, then need to add there this code too? | 11:23 |
quiquell | sshnaidm: You are right | 11:23 |
*** vinaykns has quit IRC | 11:25 | |
rfolco | arxcruz, this one https://tree.taiga.io/project/tripleo-ci-board/issue/323?kanban-status=2027734 | 11:27 |
rfolco | arxcruz, create a new one for tempest in this sprint board | 11:28 |
rfolco | arxcruz, create a story/task, not issue | 11:28 |
rfolco | or just move | 11:29 |
arxcruz | rfolco: story, or task? for me only shows a story, but i think it would fit better in a card.. | 11:30 |
rfolco | arxcruz, that one was an issue | 11:30 |
rfolco | arxcruz, I believe this should be a story/task | 11:31 |
rfolco | arxcruz, story: Run full Tempest on centos-7 periodic standalone jobs in rdo-jobs | 11:32 |
rfolco | something like that | 11:32 |
*** ratailor has quit IRC | 11:40 | |
sshnaidm | ssbarnea|rover, marios commented | 11:51 |
sshnaidm | on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/622187 | 11:51 |
sshnaidm | quiquell, why do you need starting docker service with become true? can't we just assume docker is running? | 11:56 |
sshnaidm | quiquell, it requires sudo | 11:56 |
hubbot1 | FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-fedora-28-standalone @ https://review.openstack.org/560445, stable/ocata: tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001 @ https://review.openstack.org/564291 | 11:56 |
quiquell | sshnaidm: I always forgot about starting docker after reboot my laptop :-) | 11:57 |
quiquell | sshnaidm: have to add it to systemd | 11:57 |
quiquell | sshnaidm: but yes if we add it as a manual req we don't need that part | 11:57 |
quiquell | sshnaidm: It's giving you problems ' | 11:57 |
sshnaidm | quiquell, well, it asks for sudo every time, so yes :) | 11:58 |
quiquell | sshnaidm: Ups, I have remove password for my sude :-/ | 11:58 |
marios_|ruck | ssbarnea|rover: checked at https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1804812 & added comment #2 ... i think we need to get upgrades folks/mistral to fix this. low priority/race but valid issue afaics | 11:58 |
openstack | Launchpad bug 1804812 in tripleo "[master][noop] multinode container update job failed with RuntimeError: Update failed with: {u'status': u'RUNNING', while overcloud minor update" [Critical,Triaged] - Assigned to mathieu bultel (mat-bultel) | 11:58 |
sshnaidm | quiquell, this is dangerous too much :) | 11:59 |
quiquell | sshnaidm: remove that part if you want and push anodther patchset | 11:59 |
quiquell | sshnaidm: Agree with you | 11:59 |
sshnaidm | quiquell, ovb jobs start \o/ | 11:59 |
quiquell | sshnaidm: yes !!! | 11:59 |
quiquell | sshnaidm: holy sh... can I see the config ? | 11:59 |
sshnaidm | now I can start working.. | 11:59 |
sshnaidm | quiquell, yeah, will push it now | 11:59 |
ykarel | sshnaidm, can u please review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/618669/ | 11:59 |
quiquell | sshnaidm: same tenant ? | 11:59 |
sshnaidm | quiquell, yep | 11:59 |
quiquell | sshnaidm: same base job ? I am changin the base job | 12:00 |
sshnaidm | ykarel, looking | 12:00 |
marios_|ruck | sshnaidm: thanks. mainly we posted that patch for the discussion & visibility, we're kind of half serious about merging it cc ssbarnea|rover | 12:00 |
sshnaidm | quiquell, need to check if it didn't break upstream jobs.. | 12:00 |
quiquell | sshnaidm: ack | 12:01 |
sshnaidm | ykarel, I understand the problem, but not sure I understand the solution.. | 12:04 |
quiquell | sshnaidm: btw doing "recheck" is much faster it does not clone stuff | 12:04 |
quiquell | sshnaidm: in case you have to re-iteratre on test project | 12:04 |
sshnaidm | quiquell, yeah, of course | 12:04 |
ykarel | sshnaidm, it just runs collect logs in run.yaml as after that te broker destroys, in post it checks if collect logs run it skips it | 12:04 |
*** dsneddon has joined #oooq | 12:04 | |
ykarel | and u can check logs, overcloud logs are now collected | 12:05 |
*** holser|lunch is now known as holser_ | 12:06 | |
quiquell | sshnaidm: After having ovb working and upstream working I think we can merge the review | 12:07 |
ykarel | sshnaidm, also it's the same as done in legacy workflow but was accidentally removed in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/589068/29/playbooks/tripleo-ci/templates/toci_quickstart.sh.j2@164, maybe it makes more clear? | 12:09 |
sshnaidm | ykarel, yeah, didn't see it's removed there.. | 12:10 |
sshnaidm | ykarel, ack | 12:10 |
*** d0ugal has joined #oooq | 12:16 | |
quiquell | marios_|ruck: Can you put back the +2 here ? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/621517 | 12:24 |
quiquell | marios_|ruck: After address your comment I have lose it :-( | 12:24 |
quiquell | sshnaidm: to fix bug https://review.openstack.org/#/c/621517 regarding update of containers | 12:24 |
quiquell | sshnaidm: Looks like we cannot really use the same roles at base, since local gerrit cannot be clone from RDO | 12:27 |
ykarel | quiquell, from logs there is some sytax error | 12:27 |
ykarel | http://logs.openstack.org/17/621517/6/check/tripleo-ci-centos-7-standalone/b5b1677/job-output.txt.gz#_2018-12-03_11_56_31_927118 | 12:27 |
quiquell | ykarel: you are right | 12:28 |
quiquell | ykarel: fixing | 12:28 |
ykarel | ack | 12:29 |
*** ykarel is now known as ykarel|afk | 12:29 | |
quiquell | ykarel|afk: missing stuff at defaults | 12:30 |
*** quiquell is now known as quiquell|lunch | 12:33 | |
marios | ok quiquell|lunch | 12:36 |
*** amoralej is now known as amoralej|lunch | 12:42 | |
*** ykarel|afk is now known as ykarel | 12:43 | |
*** ykarel is now known as ykarel|afk | 12:51 | |
sshnaidm | ykarel|afk, can't understand how this job passed: https://logs.rdoproject.org/69/618669/10/openstack-check/tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001-pike-branch/b033d2b/job-output.txt.gz | 12:53 |
*** jjoyce has quit IRC | 12:55 | |
*** jjoyce has joined #oooq | 12:57 | |
*** udesale has joined #oooq | 13:00 | |
rfolco | marios, need your consultant services | 13:08 |
rfolco | marios, upgrades | 13:08 |
marios_|ruck | rfolco: sec just talking on tripleo | 13:08 |
rfolco | marios, ok np | 13:09 |
sshnaidm | quiquell|lunch, I think you need to do the same: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/17581/ | 13:10 |
*** sshnaidm is now known as sshnaidm|afk | 13:14 | |
marios_|ruck | rfolco: o/ | 13:16 |
*** jtomasek_ has joined #oooq | 13:17 | |
rfolco | marios_|ruck, I am trying to understand the steps to convert scnerio000 upgrade/update to standalone... so I see that there is a fs056 w/ standalone upgrade | 13:17 |
rfolco | with a different workflow | 13:17 |
rfolco | https://github.com/openstack-infra/tripleo-ci/blob/master/zuul.d/standalone-jobs.yaml#L58-L61 | 13:17 |
marios_|ruck | rfolco: ah right. indeed there already exists the standalone upgrade job | 13:17 |
marios_|ruck | rfolco: yeah it doesn't runa full upgrade | 13:17 |
marios_|ruck | rfolco: it just runs the upgrade tasks | 13:17 |
rfolco | marios_|ruck, scenario000 would be keystone only full upgrade? I am confused | 13:18 |
marios_|ruck | rfolco: right | 13:18 |
*** jtomasek has quit IRC | 13:18 | |
rfolco | fs056 workflow uses standalone_upgrade tag | 13:19 |
marios_|ruck | rfolco: so there are two parts. testing the workflow, which is currently done by scenario000multinode-upgrade/update | 13:19 |
marios_|ruck | rfolco: the second part is to just exercise the upgrade_tasks and we have standalone upgrade for it | 13:19 |
marios_|ruck | rfolco: hm | 13:19 |
marios_|ruck | rfolco: so not sure we can make a translation of that workflow job to a standalone | 13:20 |
marios_|ruck | rfolco: i.e. it has to be multinode so we can run the upgrade workflow (e.g. openstack overcloud upgrade cli) from the undercloud on the overcloud | 13:20 |
rfolco | marios_|ruck, multinode fs037/fs051 you mean? | 13:20 |
marios_|ruck | rfolco: yeah if that is what the current job uses | 13:21 |
marios_|ruck | rfolco: so our task could be wrong there | 13:21 |
marios_|ruck | rfolco: i only noticed that scenario000 is only for update/upgrade | 13:21 |
marios_|ruck | this morning | 13:21 |
marios_|ruck | rfolco: when reviewing your patch (added a comment about it) | 13:22 |
marios_|ruck | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/619337 this one i mean | 13:22 |
rfolco | marios_|ruck, so if there is no point in converting multinode upggrade to standalone, what we can do? perhaps just create a update version of the new standalone workflow ? | 13:22 |
marios_|ruck | rfolco: nothing we keep it | 13:23 |
marios_|ruck | rfolco: this is what we discussed at denver ptg | 13:23 |
marios_|ruck | rfolco: 2 jobs/worfkflow | 13:23 |
marios_|ruck | chem: matbu o/ folks | 13:23 |
marios_|ruck | rfolco: and i discussing about scneario multinode jobs moving to standalone | 13:24 |
marios_|ruck | chem: matbu would be great if you can join the community call later | 13:24 |
chem | marios_|ruck: o/ | 13:24 |
marios_|ruck | rfolco: we realised that we can't /don't want to '#translate' scnario000-upgrades/updates jobs since we said we'd keep them right? | 13:24 |
marios_|ruck | chem: ^ | 13:25 |
marios_|ruck | chem: i mean we said we'd have two ... your standalone job to test upgrad_tasks and then the existing multinode scenario0 for testing the workflow | 13:25 |
marios_|ruck | correct? | 13:25 |
rfolco | marios_|ruck, from all you said, it looks like we just need to create the standalone update workflow with a new featureset file like done in fs056 with the upgrade one | 13:25 |
marios_|ruck | rfolco: yes that is a good point. there is no standalone update job so we should have that for better coverage? | 13:26 |
marios_|ruck | rfolco: so i think our task for 'translate scenario0' is invalid in the current form | 13:26 |
chem | marios_|ruck: oki, the plan was standalone upgrade N-1->N, upgrade N->N (workflow) so no standalone here, and for update ... well if we could do it as usuall that would be cool. | 13:27 |
*** rlandy has joined #oooq | 13:27 | |
chem | marios_|ruck: what I've been done, aware of, is standalone upgrade, and update. For the workflow N->N, I'm not sure of the status, but I'm supposed to look at it during that "sprint" | 13:28 |
chem | s/I've/have/ | 13:28 |
rfolco | so fs056 is N-1->N ? | 13:29 |
rfolco | chem, ^ | 13:29 |
rlandy | quiquell|lunch: hey | 13:29 |
rlandy | quiquell|lunch: having some issues with zuul rekicking and logs when you get back | 13:30 |
chem | rfolco: it's the standalone upgrade so N-1->N | 13:30 |
marios_|ruck | chem: thanks yeah .. we are just looking for sanity check ... we have tasks for each scnarioX multinode translate to standalone. discussing scen0 and i only realised this morning that it is specifically for upgrade/update job. so we don't want to translate this one like the others. it is special case and covered already with your standlone-upgrade job | 13:30 |
rlandy | panda: hello ... did you see email wrt reproducer cards? | 13:30 |
rfolco | chem, do you or anybody else planning to create the N->N upgrade standalone job, and the update standalone with new fesatureset and new workflow like done in fs056 ? | 13:31 |
chem | rfolco: marios_|ruck any I'll join, as I'm supposed to work on this, but until now the bandwidth alocated to this has been thin. | 13:31 |
chem | rfolco: so I'm sopposed/would like to do it before Christmas | 13:32 |
chem | rfolco: sorry I may have misundestood your question ... | 13:33 |
chem | rfolco: N->N will not be standalone | 13:33 |
chem | rfolco: as for update are we talking about uc or oc ? | 13:33 |
rfolco | chem, yeah my question was regarding standalone. As we are moving scenario multinode to standalone jobs, scenario000 just fell in my lap | 13:35 |
chem | rfolco: so for standalone, we don't have any other jobs planning to use standalone | 13:35 |
rfolco | not even update ? | 13:36 |
rfolco | scenario000 fs037 was multinode update overcloud... | 13:37 |
chem | rfolco: yeah, didn't though about that one yet, we need to evaluate what it would bring to us. | 13:37 |
chem | rfolco: so standalone update is an unknown for now. | 13:38 |
rfolco | chem, ok cool. Thanks for all good answers | 13:38 |
chem | rfolco: any time | 13:39 |
rfolco | marios_|ruck, wondering if I can just rebase so we merge the deprecation as is and address scen000 in a separate patch | 13:41 |
rfolco | marios_|ruck, I beg you | 13:41 |
marios_|ruck | rfolco: yes | 13:42 |
rfolco | marios_|ruck, thanks for saving one more ci round | 13:43 |
marios_|ruck | rfolco: i +2 already | 13:43 |
*** quiquell|lunch is now known as quiquell | 13:44 | |
quiquell | rlandy: o/ I am back | 13:45 |
*** jaosorior has joined #oooq | 13:45 | |
rlandy | quiquell: hi ... | 13:46 |
rlandy | quiquell: I was running yesterday using my rdocloud tenant | 13:46 |
rlandy | trying to test out passing a dlrn hash | 13:46 |
quiquell | sshnaidm|afk: Why we don't need that for upstream ? | 13:46 |
quiquell | rlandy: Did you were able to run it ? | 13:47 |
rlandy | my jobs schedules, run, fails (as it does in ci - separate issue) | 13:47 |
rlandy | says no log dir | 13:47 |
rlandy | reruns over and over again | 13:47 |
quiquell | rlandy: what job are you kicking ? | 13:47 |
rlandy | quiquell: I went back to the standard: | 13:48 |
rlandy | - project: | 13:48 |
rlandy | 13:48 | |
rlandy | check: | 13:48 |
rlandy | 13:48 | |
rlandy | jobs: | 13:48 |
rlandy | 13:48 | |
rlandy | - tripleo-ci-centos-7-containers-multinode | 13:48 |
quiquell | rlandy: try with standalone first | 13:48 |
rlandy | quiquell: ok if it failed - I saw some failures in ci | 13:48 |
quiquell | rlandy: go to the gerrit review at your local gerrit | 13:48 |
rlandy | but it never recorded the failure | 13:48 |
rlandy | it just keeps running | 13:48 |
quiquell | rlandy: have you ssh the node ? | 13:48 |
quiquell | rlandy: you have all the logs there | 13:49 |
rlandy | quiquell; I only see the logs from the time I ran on libvirt | 13:49 |
quiquell | rlandy: let me kick the same job | 13:49 |
quiquell | rlandy: I haven't test multinode yet | 13:49 |
rlandy | quiquell: I think it's my rdocloud config somewhere | 13:49 |
quiquell | rlandy: sshnaidm|afk said it worked though | 13:49 |
rlandy | quiquell; yep - sshnaidm|afk did | 13:50 |
rlandy | quiquell: on a side note ... | 13:50 |
rlandy | I looked into the zuul api review | 13:50 |
quiquell | rlandy: could be the upstream image you used ? | 13:50 |
quiquell | rlandy: Good thing we can run more than one job if we are below quota | 13:50 |
rlandy | quiquell: even if the image is faulty, ut should fail | 13:50 |
rlandy | not run and run with no results | 13:50 |
rlandy | quiquell: I think maybe conig problem | 13:51 |
rlandy | config | 13:51 |
rlandy | did you set your log dir somewhere | 13:51 |
rlandy | I think it can't log which is why it doesn;t know results | 13:51 |
quiquell | rlandy: nope, no log_dir | 13:52 |
quiquell | rlandy: have you try standalone job ? | 13:52 |
rlandy | quiquell: weird .. sending you link in pvt | 13:52 |
quiquell | rlandy: It's like the first step before test multinode | 13:52 |
quiquell | rlandy: ack | 13:52 |
*** weshay_traveling is now known as weshay_mtg | 13:53 | |
weshay_mtg | arxcruz++ | 13:54 |
hubbot1 | weshay_mtg: arxcruz's karma is now 10 | 13:54 |
weshay_mtg | https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-meeting-items | 13:54 |
weshay_mtg | arxcruz, thank you | 13:54 |
arxcruz | weshay_mtg: not my fault | 13:54 |
arxcruz | :P | 13:54 |
weshay_mtg | chandan_kumar, any updates sent to openstack-discuss/dev? | 13:54 |
weshay_mtg | kopecmartin, any updates sent to rh-openstack-dev? | 13:56 |
hubbot1 | FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-fedora-28-standalone @ https://review.openstack.org/560445, stable/ocata: tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001 @ https://review.openstack.org/564291 | 13:56 |
chandan_kumar | weshay_mtg: will send it tonight few patches needs +2 and +w so waiting | 13:56 |
quiquell | marios_|ruck: confimed that the f28 post issue is not related to the SSL | 13:56 |
quiquell | marios_|ruck: it's happening at TASK [collect-logs : Collect container info and logs] | 13:56 |
quiquell | marios_|ruck: Have life system now with the issue | 13:56 |
weshay_mtg | chandan_kumar, thank you | 13:56 |
kopecmartin | weshay_mtg, i have it prepared, I'll send it today | 13:56 |
weshay_mtg | kopecmartin, thank you | 13:56 |
*** sshnaidm|afk is now known as sshnaidm | 13:59 | |
rfolco | marios_|ruck, in that patch I deprecated old newton/ocata jobs (non-containerized)... scen000 is containerized job, it will be done in a separate patch (deprecate multinode container jobs) | 13:59 |
marios_|ruck | rfolco: ok makes sense | 14:00 |
chandan_kumar | kopecmartin: arxcruz needs qe for this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1569624 | 14:00 |
openstack | bugzilla.redhat.com bug 1569624 in openstack-tempest "discover-tempest-config does not configure the keystone extensions" [High,On_qa] - Assigned to chkumar | 14:00 |
chandan_kumar | kopecmartin: arxcruz it is done from myside | 14:00 |
arxcruz | chandan_kumar: after tripleo meeting | 14:00 |
*** amoralej|lunch is now known as amoralej | 14:03 | |
marios | ssbarnea|rover: yes | 14:03 |
marios | lets talk here cos of meeting | 14:03 |
marios | ssbarnea|rover: that looks like the error from yesterday see line 32 https://review.rdoproject.org/etherpad/p/ruckrover-sprint23 https://review.rdoproject.org/etherpad/p/ruckrover-sprint23 | 14:03 |
marios | ssbarnea|rover: hm well almost, the first trace there is the same tempest @ http://logs.rdoproject.org/openstack-periodic/git.openstack.org/openstack-infra/tripleo-ci/master/periodic-tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001-master/e4a792d/job-output.txt.gz also tempest here http://logs.rdoproject.org/openstack-periodic/git.openstack.org/openstack-infra/tripleo-ci/master/periodic-tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-1ctlr_1comp-featureset020-master/0f | 14:04 |
marios | ssbarnea|rover: they have that sendmail thing | 14:04 |
marios | ssbarnea|rover: but we need a new bug for it | 14:04 |
ssbarnea|rover | marios: creating one now | 14:05 |
marios | ssbarnea|rover: thanks | 14:05 |
weshay_mtg | thanks arx | 14:06 |
ssbarnea|rover | marios: not sure against which LP project I should raise it. | 14:06 |
rlandy | quiquell: k - let's continue here | 14:06 |
rlandy | quiquell, | 14:06 |
quiquell | rlandy: landy, sshnaidm has run OVB too | 14:06 |
quiquell | rlandy: I think it's time to merge this | 14:06 |
rlandy | quiquell: really - that's awesome | 14:06 |
quiquell | rlandy: we have standalone, multinode and OVB | 14:06 |
rlandy | quiquell: I am still trying to reach panda re: cards | 14:07 |
quiquell | rlandy: also now y ou can do docker-compose up reproducer and will wait for readiness | 14:07 |
quiquell | rlandy: Let's crete the cards | 14:07 |
rlandy | quiquell: no response yet wrt making this a new user staory | 14:07 |
quiquell | We can move them | 14:07 |
rlandy | quiquell: yep ok - doing it today then | 14:07 |
rlandy | quiquell: wrt dlrn_hash | 14:07 |
rlandy | quiquell: I looked at the zuul api review | 14:07 |
quiquell | rlandy: loks like for RDO we need our email here https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/17581/ | 14:07 |
quiquell | rlandy: what did you doo just at dlrn_hash to "vars:" ? | 14:08 |
quiquell | and newest | 14:08 |
*** udesale has quit IRC | 14:08 | |
rlandy | quiquell: wait - we need to add our names to https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/17581/1/resources/gerrit-stream.yaml? | 14:08 |
rlandy | everyone who runs the reproducer? | 14:09 |
sshnaidm | rfolco, usually no need to rebase patches in gerrit, zuul does it automatically when starts jobs | 14:10 |
quiquell | rlandy: looks like for RDO yes, but maybe the have groups or th elike | 14:10 |
rlandy | quiquell: ok - so let's commit a review for our names ... sec | 14:11 |
*** skramaja has quit IRC | 14:11 | |
quiquell | rlandy: going to add yours too | 14:11 |
rlandy | quiquell: oh - you have a review - was going to add one | 14:11 |
chandan_kumar | arxcruz: please have a look at this one https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1806699 | 14:11 |
openstack | Launchpad bug 1806699 in tripleo "HTTPConnectionPool(host='tempest-sendmail.tripleo.org', port=8080): Max retries exceeded with url" [Undecided,Triaged] | 14:11 |
rfolco | sshnaidm, automatic rebases don't work | 14:11 |
sshnaidm | rfolco, can you show? | 14:12 |
arxcruz | chandan_kumar: problem is that same ip tries to connect several times to tempest sendmail service | 14:12 |
arxcruz | chandan_kumar: there are some rules on the api to avoid spam | 14:12 |
*** vinaykns has joined #oooq | 14:12 | |
quiquell | Going to add wes too | 14:12 |
rlandy | quiquell: ack | 14:12 |
rlandy | rfolco: hey | 14:12 |
rlandy | rfolco: have been trying to reach panda wrt cards - no response - just going o and creating new user story | 14:13 |
rfolco | sshnaidm, well, when I see a patch in merge conflict, i rebase it manually.... am I crazy? | 14:13 |
sshnaidm | rfolco, in upstream gerrit?? | 14:13 |
rfolco | rlandy, let me know if you need help in this admin work | 14:13 |
rlandy | quiquell: better put that on ethrepad | 14:13 |
rlandy | rfolco: there is a user story | 14:13 |
rlandy | but it's got other info on it | 14:14 |
rlandy | I think maybe we need a new user story? | 14:14 |
sshnaidm | rfolco, oh,yeah, I'm talking about patches without merge-in-conflict | 14:14 |
sshnaidm | rfolco, like pushing button "rebase" in gerrit | 14:14 |
rfolco | sshnaidm, hmm ok I admit I did some rebases when not in conflict | 14:15 |
rfolco | sshnaidm, you are right. | 14:15 |
quiquell | sshnaidm, rlandy: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/17677/ | 14:15 |
rfolco | sshnaidm, thank you, I'll do manual rebase only when in conflict :) | 14:15 |
*** irclogbot_0 has quit IRC | 14:15 | |
quiquell | added to etherpad | 14:16 |
rlandy | quiquell: cool | 14:16 |
rlandy | quiquell: so - lastly wrt the dlrn_hash | 14:16 |
rlandy | quiquell: two issue - to get the has from the ci job | 14:16 |
rlandy | and then to pass the hash | 14:16 |
rlandy | wrt getting the hash, I looked at the zuul api review | 14:17 |
rlandy | don't think that will help us | 14:17 |
rlandy | as it returns zuul vars | 14:17 |
rlandy | this is a node hostvar | 14:17 |
rlandy | unrelated to zuul | 14:17 |
rlandy | I left two possibilities on the etherpad | 14:17 |
rlandy | curl http://logs.openstack.org/97/617997/32/check/tripleo-ci-centos-7-undercloud-containers/b8600f9/logs/undercloud/etc/yum.repos.d/delorean-current.repo.txt.gz | grep baseurl | awk -F / '{print $NF}' | 14:17 |
rlandy | ^^ the user would have to pass the location of the log they wish to reproduce | 14:18 |
rlandy | which is probably a reasonable thing to ask | 14:18 |
rlandy | or the reproducer script can populate it | 14:18 |
rlandy | or ... | 14:18 |
rlandy | whatever but querying the jobs for a hostvar was not in the api afaict | 14:19 |
quiquell | rlandy: sorry was at phone | 14:19 |
rlandy | quiquell: np - just left some notes above | 14:20 |
quiquell | rlandy: so first we need to get hashes from logs as stated in the etherpad | 14:20 |
rlandy | quiquell: ack - id you're ok with that - it's possible | 14:20 |
rlandy | the repos are always in the same place | 14:20 |
quiquell | rlandy: we can even add some custom roles that do that at job time | 14:21 |
rlandy | if we land up doing a reproducer script in each job, we can populate it | 14:21 |
rlandy | I think that will be easiest | 14:21 |
rlandy | because we will need to pas that value to override | 14:21 |
quiquell | rlandy: ahh understood | 14:21 |
rlandy | quiquell: sound like an ok plan? | 14:21 |
quiquell | rlandy: yep harcoded hashes there | 14:21 |
rlandy | there is no good way to query for a node var | 14:22 |
quiquell | rlandy: I was thinking on pointing to the logs.o.o url and make it run | 14:22 |
rlandy | zuul vars, yes | 14:22 |
quiquell | rlandy: but script is like the workflow we usually have so it's ok | 14:22 |
rlandy | quiquell: yeah - that can work | 14:22 |
rlandy | either way, when it comes to reproducing an exact run, the user will know the log location | 14:22 |
quiquell | rlandy: Yep maybe since start up takes time, workflow have to be differnt | 14:23 |
rlandy | quiquell: ok - carrying on with that approach then | 14:23 |
quiquell | rlandy: like user has a started up zuul | 14:23 |
quiquell | rlandy: we can do that with script too | 14:23 |
quiquell | no problem | 14:23 |
quiquell | ok | 14:23 |
rlandy | quiquell: right but they will need to edit the job description | 14:23 |
quiquell | so other than that did the hashes reach the playbooks ? | 14:23 |
rlandy | to get hash defined in extra_vars | 14:23 |
rlandy | quiquell: essentially we are doing something like featureset override | 14:24 |
quiquell | rlandy: yep | 14:24 |
rlandy | quiquell: fine - ok - now that I have a job running and not just dying and rerunning on me I can try passing the dlrn_hash again | 14:25 |
quiquell | rlandy: recomend you on standalone take less time to itearate (I am stubborn) | 14:26 |
sshnaidm | quiquell, how do we hold nodes after a job? | 14:26 |
quiquell | rlandy: btw multinode working here too :-) | 14:26 |
quiquell | sshnaidm: let me put it in the ethernet | 14:26 |
quiquell | etherpad | 14:26 |
quiquell | :-) | 14:26 |
rlandy | quiquell: yep - I wanted to test the networking/bridge piece | 14:26 |
quiquell | rlandy: ack | 14:26 |
sshnaidm | why don't we use wiki in taiga | 14:26 |
quiquell | rlandy: btw we cannot use directly the config-project base | 14:26 |
* rlandy is also stubborn about testing | 14:26 | |
quiquell | rlandy: it depends on beaing able to clone stuff from local gerrit at RDO | 14:27 |
rlandy | quiquell: you mean in rdo only? | 14:27 |
rlandy | sshnaidm; I never moved the etherpad - my fault | 14:27 |
quiquell | rlandy: at rdo yep | 14:32 |
quiquell | rlandy: one of the roles there try to acces https://gerrit/test1 and of course is not accesible | 14:32 |
quiquell | rlandy: but I think we does not diverge to much now | 14:32 |
quiquell | rlandy: let me put a patchset wich reduce divergence and you see | 14:33 |
quiquell | rlandy, sshnaidm: I think we have to merge this | 14:33 |
quiquell | I am paranoic having it open with so much ps and stuff | 14:33 |
amoralej | i'm getting a oooq job problem while testing ovs update | 14:35 |
amoralej | it fails in docker-puppet.py for ovn_controller | 14:35 |
amoralej | where are the logs for the puppet execution in docker-puppet.py? | 14:35 |
rfolco | CI community meeting (office hours) starts now at https://bluejeans.com/4113567798 - agenda: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-ci-squad-meeting | 14:35 |
quiquell | chandan_kumar: you there ? | 14:36 |
rfolco | kill SIGCALL | 14:36 |
chandan_kumar | quiquell: yes sir | 14:36 |
chandan_kumar | quiquell: is it still failing? | 14:36 |
quiquell | chandan_kumar: I have reproduce f28 issue with tempest | 14:36 |
quiquell | chandan_kumar: https://media-protected.taiga.io/attachments/0/f/c/c/cf9664250780bd546d32671e2fb98e8157e56dd8f00a9ad37171c4a844ae/tempest.log?token=XAaQxQ%3ANsAGjTRv-Jt4nBDXSTCgyEH0FQTOySsCndKHtAP2DB3TqxlqX1k_q4NWPh8lICd3uC1S2lBjfHh3Qr2cPZMV_Q | 14:36 |
quiquell | chandan_kumar: I have also access to a life system | 14:36 |
*** zul has quit IRC | 14:37 | |
quiquell | chandan_kumar: I know how to fix it for python3 but have to discover the place at tempest_conf | 14:37 |
quiquell | chandan_kumar: is about encoding st uff | 14:37 |
chandan_kumar | quiquell: it also might be related to regionname of those services | 14:38 |
quiquell | chandan_kumar: "UnicodeDecodeError: 'utf-8' codec can't decode byte 0xfb in position 3: invalid start byte? | 14:38 |
quiquell | chandan_kumar: ^ this ? | 14:38 |
chandan_kumar | quiquell: sorry | 14:39 |
quiquell | chandan_kumar: The link I pasted is a link to tempest.log at the end there is the error with encoding | 14:40 |
quiquell | chandan_kumar: It's a python3 issue related to change on strings | 14:40 |
*** zul has joined #oooq | 14:40 | |
chandan_kumar | quiquell: Yes I can see | 14:42 |
chandan_kumar | quiquell: https://github.com/openstack/python-tempestconf/blob/master/config_tempest/services/image.py#L190 | 14:47 |
quiquell | sshnaidm: added example of autohold in the etherpad | 14:47 |
quiquell | sshnaidm: is super easy | 14:47 |
sshnaidm | quiquell, great, thanks | 14:47 |
quiquell | chandan_kumar: yep putting a revie in place to encode ti utf-8 that | 14:47 |
chandan_kumar | quiquell: in this file lots of with open is used, do we want to use codecs before opening the file | 14:47 |
chandan_kumar | quiquell: let me send a patch | 14:48 |
chandan_kumar | sorry | 14:48 |
chandan_kumar | quiquell: feel free to send a patch | 14:48 |
chandan_kumar | quiquell: /usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/config_tempest/services/volume.py:39: ResourceWarning: unclosed <socket.socket fd=3, family=AddressFamily.AF_INET, type=SocketKind.SOCK_STREAM, proto=6, laddr=('192.168.24.1', 59722), raddr=('192.168.24.1', 8776)> these warning pops up when correct regionname for a service is not picked soemtime | 14:51 |
quiquell | chandan_kumar: maybe we have more encoding issues elsewhere | 14:51 |
quiquell | chandan_kumar: how is tempest_conf tested with python3 ? | 14:52 |
*** vinaykns has quit IRC | 14:52 | |
quiquell | chandan_kumar: This looks good to you https://review.openstack.org/622343 ? | 14:52 |
*** udesale has joined #oooq | 14:53 | |
*** irclogbot_0 has joined #oooq | 14:54 | |
sshnaidm | quiquell, where is the etherpad? | 14:55 |
quiquell | sshnaidm: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/reproducer-workflows-evaluation | 14:55 |
quiquell | sshnaidm: Is at a comment in the taiga taks | 14:55 |
quiquell | ask | 14:55 |
quiquell | task | 14:55 |
chandan_kumar | quiquell: yup | 14:58 |
quiquell | chandan_kumar: will it break python2 ? | 14:58 |
*** zul has quit IRC | 14:58 | |
quiquell | rlandy: last patchset reduce divergence, take a look | 14:59 |
chandan_kumar | quiquell: I am not sure, Need to check | 14:59 |
chandan_kumar | quiquell: let's add a depends-on in ci | 14:59 |
quiquell | rlandy: also want to talk about libvirt node lifecycle, and a crazy idea | 14:59 |
chandan_kumar | quiquell: for python2, we need codecs stiff | 14:59 |
quiquell | chandan_kumar: alrady runnign it at my local thingy | 14:59 |
quiquell | chandan_kumar: it's codecs compatible with python3 ? or it's only python2 stuff ? | 15:00 |
chandan_kumar | quiquell: regarding python3 python-tempestconf support may be tosky and kopecmartin can answer are we running tempestconf with python3? | 15:01 |
quiquell | chandan_kumar: I see a tox job there | 15:01 |
chandan_kumar | quiquell: http://python-notes.curiousefficiency.org/en/latest/python3/text_file_processing.html#what-changed-in-python-3 -> codecs and ecoding are part of open now in python3 | 15:01 |
chandan_kumar | quiquell: i think it is for unit test | 15:01 |
*** vinaykns has joined #oooq | 15:02 | |
kopecmartin | chandan_kumar, quiquell yes, it's for unit tests | 15:02 |
quiquell | kopecmartin: So not all the code is exercises, ack | 15:02 |
quiquell | kopecmartin: it's related to this https://review.openstack.org/#/c/622343/ | 15:03 |
quiquell | kopecmartin: is this python2 comliant ? | 15:03 |
quiquell | compliant | 15:03 |
rlandy | quiquell: sorry - was just creating cards | 15:03 |
quiquell | rlandy: do you need help there ? | 15:04 |
rlandy | quiquell: we have a new user story and cards | 15:04 |
quiquell | yay! | 15:04 |
rlandy | see https://tree.taiga.io/project/tripleo-ci-board/taskboard/sprint-23unified-sprint-2 | 15:04 |
rlandy | quiquell: I'll fill in more details later | 15:04 |
rlandy | but the user story and cards are there | 15:04 |
chandan_kumar | quiquell: import codes still work for python3 in 3.7 | 15:04 |
rlandy | quiquell: want to talk about libvirt now? | 15:04 |
quiquell | rlandy: we can be reactive there, if we take the card we fill it, as we know what they mean and we are the owners more or less | 15:05 |
chandan_kumar | quiquell: import codes, with codes.open(file_name, encoding_type) for py2 and py3 | 15:05 |
quiquell | rlandy: yep | 15:05 |
quiquell | rlandy: do you have a blue minute ? | 15:05 |
rlandy | quiquell: sure | 15:05 |
rlandy | quiquell: https://bluejeans.com/u/rlandy | 15:06 |
chem | marios_|ruck: rfolco do I still need to join the office hour or the little chat was enough ? | 15:10 |
rfolco | chem, we closed doors early today, no customers :) | 15:11 |
chem | rfolco: oki, but I guess we wrapped it up earlier anyway | 15:11 |
rfolco | chem, I'll probably ping you about the update version of fs056, and its workflow if you don't mind | 15:12 |
chem | rfolco: please do. | 15:12 |
kopecmartin | quiquell, not all, but most of the code should be exercised by python36 | 15:12 |
marios | chem: yeah i think we covered the main things earlier. the outstanding issue now is if there will be a standalone-update | 15:12 |
chandan_kumar | arxcruz: weshay_mtg kopecmartin http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2018-December/000537.html second update on os_tempest | 15:12 |
tosky | chandan_kumar, quiquell: I think that the general answer to "is the code of <something> running with python3" is "no"; the general OpenStack goal is about functional tests at most with python3 | 15:13 |
chem | marios: yeah, right . need to think about it -> TODO, line 34293842343. Should be out soon. | 15:13 |
*** vinaykns has quit IRC | 15:14 | |
chandan_kumar | quiquell: if still not work, will dig into that tomorrow morning if it is ok? | 15:16 |
*** chem has quit IRC | 15:33 | |
*** chem has joined #oooq | 15:33 | |
*** zul has joined #oooq | 15:40 | |
ssbarnea|rover | does anyone remember that needs to be done to gain access to our KB? I tried to read https://mojo.redhat.com/docs/DOC-99172 but the only achievement was a headache. | 15:50 |
*** ykarel|afk is now known as ykarel | 15:53 | |
*** holser_ has quit IRC | 15:54 | |
*** holser_ has joined #oooq | 15:55 | |
hubbot1 | FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario001-multinode-oooq-container, tripleo-ci-fedora-28-standalone @ https://review.openstack.org/604298, master: tripleo-ci-fedora-28-standalone @ https://review.openstack.org/560445, stable/ocata: tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001 @ https://review.openstack.org/564291 | 15:56 |
ssbarnea|rover | i manged to sort it apparently,... | 15:58 |
*** vinaykns has joined #oooq | 16:03 | |
ssbarnea|rover | marios: your firstname in rdo is "User", is that on purpose? | 16:06 |
marios | ssbarnea|rover: ha no | 16:12 |
marios | ssbarnea|rover: trying to dig at that queens fs37 image issue atm but not getting very far | 16:12 |
*** bogdando has quit IRC | 16:15 | |
*** bogdando has joined #oooq | 16:16 | |
ykarel | sshnaidm, okk looking at the pike job u mentioned | 16:17 |
ykarel | sshnaidm, looks like some issue in job, u find the issue? | 16:17 |
*** bogdando has quit IRC | 16:17 | |
sshnaidm | ykarel, nope, the most interesting is that it passed | 16:18 |
*** bogdando has joined #oooq | 16:18 | |
ykarel | sshnaidm, ok /me will look, looks like job is false positive | 16:18 |
*** bogdando has quit IRC | 16:18 | |
*** bogdando has joined #oooq | 16:19 | |
*** gkadam has quit IRC | 16:28 | |
quiquell | chandan_kumar: not working still :-/ | 16:31 |
chandan_kumar | quiquell: ok will take a look tomorrow | 16:35 |
sshnaidm | ssbarnea|rover, can you please move link down, at least under the log in http://cistatus.tripleo.org/? people hardly see them in the top, also blue on blue | 16:38 |
sshnaidm | *under the logo | 16:38 |
ssbarnea|rover | sshnaidm: how about removing background image? | 16:39 |
sshnaidm | ssbarnea|rover, but it's beautiful.. | 16:39 |
ykarel | sshnaidm, seeing logs it's seems jobs ran successfully: overcloud deployed successfully, pingtest passed, but it's not shown in console.log | 16:40 |
sshnaidm | ssbarnea|rover, horizontal links should save a space anyway, btw need to do this in all other branches too | 16:40 |
ykarel | sshnaidm, have u seen it multiple jobs, or just 1 | 16:41 |
sshnaidm | ykarel, only this one so far | 16:41 |
sshnaidm | ykarel, ok, then fine | 16:41 |
sshnaidm | ykarel, I'm still trying to test logs patch with ovb.. | 16:41 |
ssbarnea|rover | sshnaidm: clearly we need to work a bit more on improving the look. for example I don't. like that I need to scroll a lot to reach the list of builds, it used not to be so far from the top. | 16:41 |
ykarel | sshnaidm, where? | 16:42 |
sshnaidm | ykarel, in your patch | 16:42 |
ykarel | sshnaidm, okk btw u can see logs from earlier run | 16:42 |
ykarel | there u can find overcloud logs are there | 16:42 |
*** jfrancoa has quit IRC | 16:43 | |
sshnaidm | ok | 16:43 |
ykarel | sshnaidm, can u also review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/620927/: container log collection fix | 16:43 |
ykarel | i commented what it fixed | 16:43 |
ssbarnea|rover | i will need to make my own deployment in order to be able to test layout changes and I don't know yet how to do it (also limited time). | 16:43 |
quiquell | ykarel: have you fix the timeout for f28 ? | 16:44 |
ykarel | quiquell, nope, i can't recall what's that | 16:44 |
ykarel | was i involved in something related? | 16:44 |
ykarel | sorry but can't recall | 16:44 |
quiquell | ykarel: POST_FAILURE at f28 | 16:44 |
quiquell | ykarel: na still there | 16:44 |
ykarel | quiquell, nope i am not aware of it | 16:45 |
quiquell | ykarel: but you use +x now I can see it ther | 16:45 |
ykarel | quiquell, okk i was trying fedora stable base job | 16:45 |
ykarel | not f28 standalone | 16:45 |
ykarel | jobs running against rdo-infra/fedora-stable-config | 16:45 |
quiquell | ykarel: ack thanks | 16:46 |
*** quiquell is now known as quiquell|off | 16:50 | |
*** ykarel is now known as ykarel|away | 17:03 | |
*** bogdando has quit IRC | 17:03 | |
ssbarnea|rover | marios: quiquell|off please help with https://review.openstack.org/622352 as is doing something good. | 17:14 |
*** ccamacho has quit IRC | 17:15 | |
*** ykarel|away has quit IRC | 17:22 | |
*** kopecmartin is now known as kopecmartin|off | 17:26 | |
*** chem has quit IRC | 17:33 | |
*** chem has joined #oooq | 17:34 | |
*** derekh has quit IRC | 17:46 | |
*** amoralej is now known as amoralej|off | 17:54 | |
hubbot1 | FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario001-multinode-oooq-container, tripleo-ci-fedora-28-standalone @ https://review.openstack.org/604298, master: tripleo-ci-fedora-28-standalone @ https://review.openstack.org/560445, stable/ocata: tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001 @ https://review.openstack.org/564291 | 17:56 |
*** holser_ has quit IRC | 18:13 | |
*** jrist has quit IRC | 18:32 | |
*** jrist has joined #oooq | 19:29 | |
*** dtantsur is now known as dtantsur|afk | 19:35 | |
rlandy | woohoo | 19:49 |
rlandy | sshnaidm: we have working dlrn_hash_tag passing :) | 19:49 |
hubbot1 | FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario001-multinode-oooq-container, tripleo-ci-fedora-28-standalone @ https://review.openstack.org/604298, master: tripleo-ci-fedora-28-standalone @ https://review.openstack.org/560445, stable/ocata: tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001 @ https://review.openstack.org/564291 | 19:56 |
*** agopi has quit IRC | 20:06 | |
rlandy | marios_|ruck; still around? | 20:14 |
rlandy | need to borrow your upgrades brain | 20:14 |
*** jrist has quit IRC | 20:39 | |
rlandy | rfolco: ping - any objections to https://review.openstack.org/#/c/622575/? | 21:05 |
rfolco | rlandy, in a normal job you don't specify this... so why on reproducer you have to ? | 21:07 |
rfolco | I mean, this is part of the workflow.. N-1 -> N upgrade for example | 21:07 |
rlandy | rfolco: because in a reproducer that is exactly what you do want to do | 21:07 |
rlandy | specify the exact dlrn hash that was run in the job | 21:07 |
rfolco | when you run the original job, how do you know which dlrn tag you use ? | 21:08 |
rfolco | rlandy, ^ | 21:08 |
*** vinaykns has quit IRC | 21:08 | |
rlandy | rfolco: you pull it from the /etc/yum.repos.d or the dlrn_hash_tag var that gets set | 21:10 |
rfolco | rlandy, so lets suppose you have a job in master, and dlrn tag for that moment was xyz, if you run the reproducer and do not specify the tag, it may get another tag with new promoted repos ? | 21:12 |
rlandy | correct | 21:13 |
rlandy | and then you won't reproduce | 21:13 |
rfolco | coz its dynamic | 21:13 |
rlandy | rfolco: I am testing the upgrades cases | 21:14 |
rlandy | in those I think we will have to pass the actual releases file | 21:15 |
rlandy | but I am checking | 21:15 |
rfolco | rlandy, hmm just curious, isn't there any other case you have to save settings from the job ? this is the only one that changes ? | 21:17 |
rlandy | rfolco: I think so besides upgrades | 21:20 |
rfolco | rlandy, the list of hackable stuff is getting huge, but I am not seeing any other forms to do it. | 21:21 |
*** jrist has joined #oooq | 21:31 | |
hubbot1 | FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario001-multinode-oooq-container, tripleo-ci-fedora-28-standalone @ https://review.openstack.org/604298, master: tripleo-ci-fedora-28-standalone @ https://review.openstack.org/560445, stable/ocata: tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001 @ https://review.openstack.org/564291 | 21:56 |
*** jaosorior has quit IRC | 22:00 | |
*** chem has quit IRC | 23:37 | |
*** chem has joined #oooq | 23:38 | |
*** udesale has quit IRC | 23:40 | |
*** tosky has quit IRC | 23:55 | |
hubbot1 | FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario001-multinode-oooq-container, tripleo-ci-fedora-28-standalone @ https://review.openstack.org/604298, master: tripleo-ci-fedora-28-standalone @ https://review.openstack.org/560445, stable/ocata: tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001 @ https://review.openstack.org/564291 | 23:56 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!