Wednesday, 2020-10-07

*** Goneri has quit IRC01:03
*** dtantsur|afk has quit IRC01:05
*** pmannidi has quit IRC03:07
*** udesale has joined #oooq03:34
*** saneax has joined #oooq03:59
*** ykarel has joined #oooq04:44
*** marios has joined #oooq05:01
bhagyashriszbr, i am trying to fix mini integration pipeline05:22
*** jtomasek has joined #oooq05:37
*** ysandeep|away is now known as ysandeep|pto05:53
*** ykarel has quit IRC05:59
*** ykarel has joined #oooq06:00
*** amoralej|off is now known as amoralej06:34
*** apetrich has joined #oooq06:44
zbrbhagyashris: thanks07:19
*** udesale has quit IRC07:20
*** yolanda has quit IRC07:20
*** yolanda has joined #oooq07:20
*** jpena|off is now known as jpena07:25
*** udesale has joined #oooq07:28
bhagyashriszbr, will need to use build-containers-ubi-8-push method to build the container so i changed that in the updated patch07:37
*** udesale_ has joined #oooq07:39
*** udesale has quit IRC07:40
*** tosky has joined #oooq07:41
*** ykarel_ has joined #oooq07:43
*** ykarel has quit IRC07:44
*** ykarel__ has joined #oooq07:44
*** ykarel_ has quit IRC07:47
*** ykarel__ is now known as ykarel07:52
*** tosky_ has joined #oooq08:12
*** tosky is now known as Guest9816008:13
*** tosky_ is now known as tosky08:13
*** Guest98160 has quit IRC08:15
*** jbadiapa has quit IRC08:32
*** derekh has joined #oooq08:43
*** ykarel_ has joined #oooq09:03
*** ykarel has quit IRC09:03
*** ykarel_ is now known as ykarel09:25
*** dtantsur has joined #oooq09:26
* marios biab09:32
chandankumararxcruz: soniya29|ruck akahat kopecmartin added tempest agenda here: https://hackmd.io/fIOKlEBHQfeTZjZmrUaEYQ?view#2020-10-0710:05
kopecmartinchandankumar: i took sick day today so won't attend, i added links for tempest bumps though10:11
sshnaidmchandankumar, commented https://review.opendev.org/#/c/752419/10:11
chandankumarkopecmartin: ok cool, will take care of that, anything which is blocked there?10:15
chandankumarkopecmartin: and get well soon man :-)10:15
chandankumarsshnaidm: sure will fix that10:15
kopecmartinchandankumar: nothing blocked, just review the spec patch, .. it feels a bit hacky10:19
kopecmartinbut i don't see other way10:20
soniya29|ruckchandankar, ack10:27
*** ykarel has quit IRC10:50
*** ykarel has joined #oooq10:50
mariossshnaidm: i know it merged but can you check comment @ https://review.opendev.org/#/c/749243/2/roles/undercloud-deploy/templates/containers-prepare-parameter.yaml.j210:56
mariossshnaidm: i am working in that file now for undercloud upgrade10:56
sshnaidmmarios, we set docker_registry_host to provider address in release files: https://github.com/openstack/tripleo-quickstart/blob/master/config/release/tripleo-ci/CentOS-8/master.yml#L2011:01
mariossshnaidm: ack... so it should be equivalent then... but maybe better to be explicit there for less confusion11:01
sshnaidmmarios, in this case we could use '{{ job.registry_ip_address }}:5001'11:01
sshnaidmmarios, but I'd like to keep it in one place11:02
mariossshnaidm: well we need both one sets the insecure registries (this file i pointed to) the other in release file sets the docker_registry passed to job11:02
sshnaidmmarios, maybe you're right11:02
mariossshnaidm: so we unfortunately have to keep it... we have same pattern for standalone11:03
mariossshnaidm: but ok fine for now just checking i didn't miss somethign thanks11:03
sshnaidmchandankumar, I'm afraid we need to add commas in the end of every line in repos: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/752419/23/playbooks/multinode-standalone-pre.yml11:04
*** jbadiapa has joined #oooq11:20
*** jpena is now known as jpena|lunch11:28
*** holser has quit IRC11:36
*** amoralej is now known as amoralej|lunch11:41
*** holser has joined #oooq11:42
*** Tengu has quit IRC11:44
*** Tengu has joined #oooq11:46
*** rlandy has joined #oooq12:01
*** rlandy is now known as rlandy|rover12:01
rlandy|roverweshay: soniya29|ruck: hey ...  https://review.opendev.org/755555 just merged - could we rekick stein line after this current run is done?12:04
soniya29|ruckrlandy|rover yes12:05
weshayrlandy|rover, sure12:05
weshayrlandy|rover, see my review re: 16.212:06
rlandy|roverweshay: yeah - I would have gone to twice but ok12:06
mariossshnaidm: any recommended image to use in upshift for reproducer?12:07
sshnaidmmarios, we have there images for reproducer, they're configured by default in reproducer role12:07
mariossshnaidm: i mean for the vm that will run reproducer12:08
sshnaidmmarios, if you use one of our CI tenant12:08
mariossshnaidm: anything centos8 fine?12:08
sshnaidmmarios, oh, I see, yeah12:08
mariossshnaidm: thanks12:08
rlandy|roverweshay: let a comment in https://code.engineering.redhat.com/gerrit/#/c/214354/12:08
sshnaidmmarios, then choose podman as container engine12:08
rlandy|roverwe usually specify the times we want to run12:08
rlandy|roverI am not familiar with /812:09
rlandy|roverguess that's very 8 hours?12:09
mariossshnaidm: thanks ... but where do you mean to set that do we have a config for the reproducer to set the container engine?12:09
rlandy|roverweshay: soniya29|ruck: we need to get network component through - it's failing scenario01012:10
sshnaidmmarios, yes12:10
rlandy|rovertempest timeout12:10
mariossshnaidm: ack12:11
*** rfolco has joined #oooq12:11
weshayrlandy|rover, ya.. after I submitted I had the same thought.. I'll update it12:11
rlandy|roverweshay: just gives us more control if we have a busy hour12:12
weshayrlandy|rover, debugging the promoter.. not seeing any candidates after https://trunk.rdoproject.org/api-centos8-train/api/civotes_agg_detail.html?ref_hash=8bda3ae5b99012fd3fd4a121ff82d06512:12
weshayfor current-tripleo-rdo :(12:12
rlandy|roverweshay: yep - only ever check ui component12:12
rlandy|roverwe need it to check the agg hash12:13
rlandy|roverwill look at it after I deal with network master12:13
soniya29|ruckrlandy|rover yes12:15
weshayrlandy|rover, updated12:18
zbrpojadhav: what is happening with py2-py3 conversion around telegraf?12:20
pojadhavzbr, moving scripts from py2 to py312:21
pojadhavzbr : https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/29235/12:21
zbrone thing that I did not understand was why folders and renames.12:21
zbri ported a lot of code from py2 to py3 but never by renaming files.12:21
pojadhavnot renaming files.. just moving files from py2 dir to py3 dir..12:22
pojadhavif both outputs are identical12:23
zbrwhy do we need a telegraph_py3 folder?12:24
weshaychandankumar, is this a tempest conf bug? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=185306712:24
openstackbugzilla.redhat.com bug 1853067 in openstack-glance "[OSP-16.1] Glance API Error - 409 Conflict Image status transition from saving to saving is not allowed" [High,New] - Assigned to chkumar12:24
weshaykopecmartin, ^12:24
chandankumarweshay: checking12:24
pojadhavin future.. telegraf(py2) folder will be deprecated once everything switched to py3 thats why..12:27
*** jpena|lunch is now known as jpena12:28
weshaychandankumar, rlandy|rover neither of those bugs seem like core tempest12:30
chandankumarweshay: it hitted the tempest api, tempest says what is the issue.12:30
chandankumarthe issue is caused due to glance side12:30
zbrpojadhav: weshay: i really do not understand the multiple folder approach around telegraf porting to py3 but if you say is better for me to not look at it, i will ignore it.12:30
chandankumarbut i need to check the logs12:30
pojadhavweshay, ^ am I giving correct answers of zbr's question..??12:31
chandankumarweshay: and attached logs is giving 40412:31
akahatrfolco, ping.. meeting.12:31
akahatchandankumar, ^^12:31
weshayzbr, two different containers12:32
weshaychandankumar, aye agree12:32
weshayzbr, ya.. we can catch up today and chat12:32
weshayzbr, about the mini-integration and cockpit containers12:33
zbrweshay: i still do not see any reason for duplicating source code. python code can be written to work with both without too much effort.12:33
weshayzbr, ya.. I agree.. this approach does allow for a transition.. but you are correct12:34
weshayzbr, once we have it all migrated to py3.. the telegraf container can be killed12:34
weshayakahat, got anything?12:35
akahatweshay, yes.. I'll talk to you after meeting. okay?12:35
weshayakahat, we have a 1-1 right now :)12:35
akahatweshay, :)12:36
* pojadhav brb12:36
weshayoh.. content provider12:36
weshayakahat, roger that12:36
zbrwho can help me read buildah logs? i am looking at https://logserver.rdoproject.org/17/29917/5/check/periodic-tripleo-ci-build-containers-ubi-8-push-victoria/8ac553b/logs/build.log and become dizzy12:36
zbris see failed as expected number is different than buid but no real error in the entire file.12:37
*** jtomasek has quit IRC12:37
zbri wonder if we could get rid of the time column, it makes much harder to read the file12:38
rlandy|roverchandankumar: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853067 updated - you no longer own it12:38
openstackbugzilla.redhat.com bug 1853067 in openstack-glance "[OSP-16.1] Glance API Error - 409 Conflict Image status transition from saving to saving is not allowed" [High,New] - Assigned to cyril12:38
weshayzbr, try to find the container that failed in that build log.. and then the details are in https://logserver.rdoproject.org/17/29917/5/check/periodic-tripleo-ci-build-containers-ubi-8-push-victoria/8ac553b/logs/buildah-builds/container-builds/734d5d01-1696-41e2-9b6f-16faf39ee499/base/12:38
chandankumarrlandy|rover: thanks :-)12:39
weshayzbr, temepst https://logserver.rdoproject.org/17/29917/5/check/periodic-tripleo-ci-build-containers-ubi-8-push-victoria/8ac553b/logs/containers-build-errors.log12:39
zbrweshay: i searched for "error" and "fail" in the file and found nothing. my ability to read 1.8MB char by char is very low.12:39
*** jtomasek has joined #oooq12:39
weshayzbr, https://logserver.rdoproject.org/17/29917/5/check/periodic-tripleo-ci-build-containers-ubi-8-push-victoria/8ac553b/logs/buildah-builds/container-builds/734d5d01-1696-41e2-9b6f-16faf39ee499/base/os/tempest/tempest-build.log12:40
weshayzbr, look at the error log12:40
chandankumarweshay: zbr on above bhagyashris is on it, tempest-all package is missing which is blocked on octavia-tempest-plugin which need some package from base repo https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=17139 & https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/29940/12:40
*** amoralej|lunch is now known as amoralej12:41
zbrwe thrive at hiding errors. zuul console reported failed task, i had to look at task detail in order to identify that output was redirected to a file named build.log, navigated to it and found it also cryptic, only mentioned that not enough containers were build, without any indication about which one failed or where to look for that.12:42
zbrhuh, saved by bhagyashris  :D12:46
zbrweshay: let me know if you have few minutes to talk around improving readability of these errors.12:47
bhagyashriszbr, i have updated the reviews that fixed the issues while doing the build push container jobs for victoria here : https://hackmd.io/sasvoKjTSkabGlFOTkK_kw#bugs-and-reviews12:49
bhagyashrisweshay, zbr, we need to merged this https://review.opendev.org/#/c/756441/1  and https://review.rdoproject.org/r/2994012:50
*** Goneri has joined #oooq12:51
bhagyashriszbr, fyi i have also changed the victoria-containers-build-push job with build-containers-ubi-8-push-victoria12:52
bhagyashrishttps://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/29915/5/zuul.d/integration-jobs-victoria.yaml@1312:52
weshaybhagyashris, does this fix the tempest container build error that zbr  is hitting?12:52
weshayhttps://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/29940/12:53
bhagyashrisweshay, zuul is -1 let me check12:54
zbrweshay: i am inclined to propose changing exclude_containers logic to be to fallback to "master" for any branch name missing from the list. see https://review.opendev.org/#/c/756441/2/roles/build-containers/vars/main.yaml12:59
zbris very easy to implement and seems to be more future proof.12:59
zbras long you do not define a custom list, it will will make use of master one.12:59
weshayzbr, we'll chat today and go through it.. k13:00
weshay?13:00
zbrsure13:00
* zbr was only looking at ways to avoid future work.13:01
rlandy|roverweshay: soniya29|ruck: look at this time trend ... interesting ... https://review.rdoproject.org/zuul/builds?job_name=periodic-tripleo-ci-centos-8-scenario010-standalone-network-master13:02
rlandy|roverthe test runs at approx 1hr30 mins until 2020-09-18 12:05:2713:03
*** rf0lc0 has joined #oooq13:03
rlandy|roverwhere is runs a whole hour longer13:03
rlandy|rover2 hrs 44 mins 1 sec from then13:03
rlandy|roverwith the sporadic 3hr8min timeout13:03
*** rfolco has quit IRC13:03
*** jmasud has quit IRC13:04
arxcruzchandankumar: am i the only one in the meeting ?13:04
chandankumararxcruz: in another meeting, joining soon13:05
*** jmasud has joined #oooq13:07
rlandy|roverweshay: merging https://code.engineering.redhat.com/gerrit/#/c/21435413:08
rlandy|roverjason seems happy with it13:08
sshnaidmmarios, if not with reproducer then you can try to run jobs on testproject in rdo as well, with dependencies13:13
sshnaidmmarios, will be faster than upstream I think13:13
mariossshnaidm: ack thanks good idea13:13
bhagyashrischandankumar, https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/29940/ +w it13:18
*** rlandy|rover is now known as rlandy|rover|mtg13:26
weshayzbr, sent a mtg13:31
*** holser has quit IRC13:36
*** holser has joined #oooq13:36
*** TrevorV has joined #oooq13:45
weshayzbr, talking to panda for a hot sec.. few min late13:58
*** rlandy|rover|mtg is now known as rlandy|rover14:02
zbrnopb14:04
sshnaidmrf0lc0, what is the reason behind hhttps://review.opendev.org/#/c/756128/3..4/zuul.d/base.yaml ?14:09
sshnaidmmarios, btw, we may change this as well:https://github.com/openstack/tripleo-ci/blob/master/playbooks/tripleo-ci/install-built-repo.yml#L1214:11
sshnaidmmarios, when you run yum/dnf update in the upgrade job we should know which repo to use14:12
sshnaidmmarios, or maybe not..14:14
weshayzbr, I'm on now14:17
mariossshnaidm: yes, install-built-repo was another thing i wanted to discuss at some point - yeah for the standalone-upgrade we have build-test-packages called during the standalone-upgrade playbook14:21
mariossshnaidm: we will either have to set two of them or ideally use the same trick with dynamic name like for registry14:21
sshnaidmmarios, do we build package for deploy or target release?14:28
mariossshnaidm: target let me fetch pointer14:30
mariossshnaidm: there https://opendev.org/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/src/commit/5728258f832dfd6d4eceffd6473dfd555d857467/playbooks/multinode-standalone-upgrade.yml#L3814:30
sshnaidmmarios, hmm.. need to remove this if job is consumer and take package from provider repo14:32
sshnaidmmarios, shouldn't it be with "build" tag? instead of standalone-upgrade14:32
mariossshnaidm: ack yes it is part of my reviews i mean doing this stuff14:32
sshnaidmmarios, not sure if naming in install-built-repo will help, because it adds repo in the job start..14:33
sshnaidmmarios, and we need to add this repo before upgrade afaiu14:33
mariossshnaidm: yes not clear to me either but i was focussed more on the containers first and wanted to discuss the gating repo things after sorting containers14:34
mariossshnaidm: so indeed, we don't need the install-built-repo for the upgrade job... at least not at the start like the others14:34
mariossshnaidm: actually... it does it for both ... i mean first it runs the deployment with https://opendev.org/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/src/commit/5728258f832dfd6d4eceffd6473dfd555d857467/playbooks/multinode-standalone.yml#L2214:35
mariossshnaidm: and then it runs it before upgrade again with 17:30 < marios> sshnaidm: there14:36
marioshttps://opendev.org/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/src/commit/5728258f832dfd6d4eceffd6473dfd555d857467/playbooks/multinode-standalone-upgrade.yml#L3814:36
sshnaidmmarios, hmm.. but patch has only one branch. Is it just skipped with wrong branch?14:37
mariossshnaidm: i am guessing so... and we are really only gating the target i.e. the 2nd one 'wins' should be14:37
sshnaidmmarios, yeah, seems like that14:38
mariossshnaidm: will dig more into that14:38
sshnaidmcool14:38
*** ykarel is now known as ykarel|away15:00
*** sshnaidm is now known as sshnaidm|afk15:01
rlandy|roverarxcruz: chandankumar: hey .. where would I see where the number of tempest tests was increased ... see the diff of these two logs - same test - one day apart - 09/17 09/18 ...15:11
rlandy|roverhttps://logserver.rdoproject.org/openstack-component-network/opendev.org/openstack/tripleo-ci/master/periodic-tripleo-ci-centos-8-scenario010-standalone-network-master/4a06c77/logs/undercloud/var/log/tempest/stestr_results.html.gz15:11
rlandy|roverhttps://logserver.rdoproject.org/openstack-component-network/opendev.org/openstack/tripleo-ci/master/periodic-tripleo-ci-centos-8-scenario010-standalone-network-master/cc5b009/logs/undercloud/var/log/tempest/stestr_results.html.gz15:11
rlandy|roverweshay: ^^ fyi - that's the time diff15:11
weshayrlandy|rover, oh.. so increasing the job timeout worked.. we just have a lot more tests?15:12
weshayrlandy|rover, that's a bit of a dynamic thing15:12
rlandy|roverweshay: idk - it's still running bit the test number dramatically increased15:13
rlandy|roverie: the number of tests running jumped from 1 per section to 24, 60 40 etc.per section15:13
arxcruzrlandy|rover: maybe new tests were added in octavia15:14
rlandy|rover145 of them?15:14
arxcruzrlandy|rover: https://github.com/openstack/octavia-tempest-plugin/commit/89bdbcd1252dbce8645c24fa6db3e2d32fa779c315:16
arxcruzlast month, a lot of testes were added, and otheres that was being skipped by default, is now being executed15:16
arxcruzlet's check the octavia rpm version15:16
rlandy|roverarxcruz: k - if that is expected, we can increase the test timeout15:17
arxcruzrlandy|rover: python3-octavia-tests-tempest-1.4.1-0.20200826090107.c611b45.el8.noarch and python3-octavia-tests-tempest-1.4.1-0.20200917112332.a80a185.el8.noarch15:17
arxcruzthey are different15:17
arxcruzprobably the second one got the new tests15:17
rlandy|roverarxcruz: k - increasing test timeout - thanks15:18
*** derekh has quit IRC15:23
*** derekh has joined #oooq15:23
weshayrlandy|rover++15:31
*** ykarel|away has quit IRC15:32
*** TrevorV has quit IRC15:33
*** TrevorV has joined #oooq15:33
weshayrlandy|rover, think I fixed the promoter..15:39
weshayhttps://trunk.rdoproject.org/api-centos8-train/api/civotes_agg_detail.html?ref_hash=2a0ebfadbca9de25dd857f351246c19b15:39
weshayis promoting15:39
rlandy|roverweshay++15:39
rlandy|roverweshay++15:39
rlandy|roverwhat was it??15:39
weshaypromoter Containers promote 'aggregate: 2a0ebfadbca9de25dd857f351246c19b, commit: e02878dcbc8f359dd0bcc9af449b507cb873bb00, distro: 5cbbd0b4457e9ba08ec63a2f091e1bcaa6cd43da, component: network, timestamp: 1601988056' to current-tripleo-rdo: Attempting promotion15:40
weshayrlandy|rover, there was a "break" in a function15:40
weshayshould not have been there15:40
rlandy|roverweshay: nice - yeah - now the numbers should match up15:40
rlandy|roverwill make my life much happier15:40
weshayrlandy|rover, I'll show you what I added later15:40
*** udesale__ has joined #oooq15:41
rlandy|roverweshay: interesting how it promoted before15:41
rlandy|roverwas it just that ui changed?15:41
*** udesale_ has quit IRC15:44
weshayrlandy|rover, tbh.. ya.. something fluky like that15:44
rlandy|roverlol15:44
rlandy|rovernice catch15:45
*** amoralej is now known as amoralej|off15:51
weshaychandankumar, is there a tempest-all rpm RUN dnf -y install iputils openstack-tempest-all && dnf clean all && rm -rf /var/cache/dnf": error while running runtime: exit status 1\n'15:56
weshayhttps://logserver.rdoproject.org/17/29917/7/check/periodic-tripleo-ci-build-containers-ubi-8-push-victoria/60eed58/logs/containers-build-errors.log15:56
weshayyup https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/29940/4/openstack-tempest.spec15:57
weshayline 14315:57
weshaysoo.. perhaps that's not in promoted-components15:57
weshayzbr, /me looks15:57
weshayhttps://trunk.rdoproject.org/centos8-victoria/component/tempest/consistent/openstack-tempest-all-25.0.0-0.20201007134423.c8d7a01.el8.noarch.rpm15:58
weshayyup.. not here15:58
weshayhttps://trunk.rdoproject.org/centos8-victoria/component/tempest/promoted-components/15:58
weshayzbr, background fyi ^15:58
* weshay repromotes consistent to promoted-components15:58
weshayand will recheck15:58
chandankumarweshay: we need to promote tempest component from consistent15:59
chandankumarto component-ci-testing15:59
chandankumarthen to promoted component15:59
weshaychandankumar, doing it now .. consistent -> promoted-components15:59
weshaythat's all we need atm15:59
weshaychandankumar, thanks15:59
* zbr wants to ask weshay why consistent had the missing rpm but promoted-components did not.15:59
weshayzbr, because after dlrn builds rpms.. they are placed into current.. if repo-closure works.. they are placed into consistent16:00
weshayzbr, and we pick up rpms in the component line... at consistent16:01
weshayhowever in victoria16:01
weshaythere is no component line..16:01
weshayso I'm bypassing it.. and promoting consistent -> promoted-components16:01
weshaywhere the integration lines start :)16:01
weshayzbr, https://hackmd.io/5uYRmLaOTI2raTbHWsaiSQ#Overview16:02
weshayyou've probably seen that before16:03
chandankumarthere is no component ci testing now as no component pipeline16:03
weshayright16:03
chandankumarhttps://trunk.rdoproject.org/centos8-victoria/component/tempest/promoted-components/openstack-tempest-all-25.0.0-0.20201007134423.c8d7a01.el8.noarch.rpm16:03
chandankumarzbr: bhagyashris can you recheck your patches,16:03
weshayzbr, this time.. tempest should build https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/29917/16:03
weshaychandankumar, I did16:03
chandankumarweshay: ok cool then16:03
zbrso the previous tempest component promotion was done when that rpm was missing from consistent16:04
weshayzbr, ya.. that rpm was not built at all16:05
chandankumarhttps://trunk.rdoproject.org/centos8-victoria/component/tempest/consistent/openstack-tempest-all-25.0.0-0.20201007134423.c8d7a01.el8.noarch.rpm16:05
weshaychandankumar, although I don't see it here https://trunk.rdoproject.org/centos8-victoria/report.html16:06
weshayor here https://trunk.rdoproject.org/centos8-victoria/status_report.html16:06
chandankumarstatus report contains tempest-all packages16:07
*** Tengu has quit IRC16:09
weshayreally..16:10
weshayI don't see it16:10
weshayhttps://trunk.rdoproject.org/centos8-victoria/status_report.html16:10
*** tosky has quit IRC16:21
*** dtantsur is now known as dtantsur|afk16:24
chandankumarweshay: i went to https://trunk.rdoproject.org/centos8-victoria/status_report.html and done ctrl + f <openstack-temepst> and then click on success url https://trunk.rdoproject.org/centos8-victoria/component/tempest/c8/d7/c8d7a01014d4b82dd9960679db5e77dc31f4d87a_7951d240/rpmbuild.log16:25
chandankumarit contains tempest-all subpackage16:25
weshayrlandy|rover, ping w/ a skip list16:27
rlandy|roverack16:27
rlandy|roverit may pass16:27
rlandy|roveron rerun16:27
rlandy|roveryou mean for scenario010??16:28
weshaychandankumar, ah. thanks16:28
weshayrlandy|rover, no.. for periodic-tripleo-ci-rhel-8-standalone-full-tempest-scenario-rhos-16.2failure (non-voting)16:28
rlandy|roverrerun in progress16:29
rlandy|roverwill add skiplist of no pass on rerun16:29
chandankumarweshay: there is alos an url to check status for a particular project need to dig that16:30
weshayrlandy|rover, this is what I found missing https://code.engineering.redhat.com/gerrit/#/c/214449/1/zuul.d/integration-pipeline-rhos-16.2.yaml16:45
rlandy|roverlooking16:46
rlandy|roverweshay: k - those jobs need to be defined first16:47
rlandy|roverwill do that16:47
*** udesale__ has quit IRC16:47
rlandy|roverthat is why zuul is objecting16:47
weshayya.. I figured.. but might as well let it tell us that16:47
rlandy|roverweshay: yeah - it's right - I'll define those16:48
weshayarxcruz, tqe/playbooks/tempest.yml16:51
weshayfor the netstat thing?16:51
weshaybefore line 196?16:51
arxcruzweshay: yup16:51
weshayarxcruz, thanks16:52
rlandy|roverlunch - brb16:57
*** marios is now known as marios|out16:58
weshayzbr, ur in bizness https://registry.rdoproject.org:8443/oapi/v1/namespaces/tripleovictoria/imagestreamtags/17:03
*** sshnaidm|afk has quit IRC17:09
weshays u c c e s s https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/29917/17:09
*** sshnaidm has joined #oooq17:10
*** ykarel has joined #oooq17:10
*** derekh has quit IRC17:10
*** ykarel has quit IRC17:18
weshayrf0lc0, can you try to move the tripleo-quickstart and tqe repos to content provider17:20
weshaymaybe there are patches already .. haven't looked17:20
*** Tengu has joined #oooq17:20
weshaybut should be another good way to road test17:21
rf0lc0weshay, k will check and do it17:21
rf0lc0weshay, my depends-on had a typo in the testproject patch... now it ran the install-built-repo.yml https://review.rdoproject.org/zuul/stream/b4662e31b5e2443085a61f1049bcbc63?logfile=console.log17:22
rf0lc0weshay, waiting to check the gate repo file17:22
*** Tengu_ has joined #oooq17:27
weshaythanks17:27
*** Tengu has quit IRC17:27
*** Tengu_ has quit IRC17:29
rlandy|roverweshay: periodic-tripleo-ci-rhel-8-standalone-full-tempest-scenario-rhos-16.2testprojectmastercheck189440,931 hr 45 mins 53 secs2020-10-07 15:17:36SUCCESS17:31
rlandy|rover^^ passed on rerun17:31
weshayok..17:31
weshayso just waiting on fs00117:31
*** ysandeep|pto is now known as ysandeep17:37
rlandy|roverperiodic-tripleo-ci-centos-8-scenario010-standalone-network-mastertestprojectmastercheck16882,163 hrs 32 mins 6 secs2020-10-07 14:09:03SUCCESS17:45
rlandy|roverwoohoo - so we just need more time ^^17:45
rlandy|roverhttps://review.rdoproject.org/r/29951 Increase timeout for scenario010 test17:45
rlandy|roverhttps://review.opendev.org/756543 Increase timeout for scenario010 test17:45
*** jpena is now known as jpena|off17:46
weshayrlandy|rover, is that the right review?17:47
rlandy|roverhttps://review.opendev.org/#/c/756543/1/zuul.d/standalone-jobs.yaml17:47
rlandy|roverthat one won't work17:47
rlandy|roverlet's merge the rdo one though17:47
weshayk17:47
rlandy|roverhttps://review.rdoproject.org/r/2995117:47
rlandy|roveridk  about upstream17:47
rlandy|roverwe may hit a problem17:47
rlandy|rovermaybe the tempest tests are diff on check17:47
weshaythanks17:47
*** Tengu has joined #oooq17:48
rlandy|roverweshay: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/756543 w-1 that one17:48
rf0lc0weshay, can you teach me how to check gate repo on https://logserver.rdoproject.org/94/29894/6/check/tripleo-ci-centos-8-undercloud-containers/b4662e3/logs/undercloud/home/zuul/17:48
rlandy|roverwe may need to reconsider that if it shows up after promotion17:48
weshayrf0lc0, sure17:49
rf0lc0weshay, I see install-built-repo.yml ran fine17:49
weshayrf0lc0, https://logserver.rdoproject.org/94/29894/6/check/tripleo-ci-centos-8-undercloud-containers/b4662e3/logs/undercloud/etc/yum.repos.d/gating.repo.txt.gz17:49
rf0lc0\o/17:49
rf0lc0weshay, thanks :)17:49
weshaylooks good to me.. double check the provider built the rpm17:50
weshayrf0lc0, was it tht?17:50
rf0lc0weshay, yep checking rpm from tht patch17:50
weshayrf0lc0,  openstack-tripleo-heat-templates         noarch  12.7.1-0.20201007161303.ffd106a.el8            gating-repo                      546 k17:50
weshayrf0lc0, worked https://logserver.rdoproject.org/94/29894/6/check/tripleo-ci-centos-8-undercloud-containers/b4662e3/logs/undercloud/var/log/dnf.log.txt.gz17:51
rf0lc0weshay, nice, now the only remaining thing for undercloud is https://review.opendev.org/#/c/756128/4/zuul.d/base.yaml17:52
rf0lc0weshay, which I think its the right place to do it17:52
weshayrf0lc0, ooh.. not sure if we cant that one the base17:53
weshaymaybe17:53
weshaysorry.. not sure if we want that on the base job def17:53
rf0lc0weshay, an intermediate layer maybe ? a new parent between just for undercloud jobs?17:54
weshaywill let sagi make that call17:54
weshayrf0lc0, where do you see that plugged in elsewhere?17:54
weshaye.g. where in the standalone zuul?17:54
rf0lc0weshay, okay, I'll propose the new layer... yes its plugged to undercloud-upgrade jobs as well17:54
weshayrf0lc0, wait17:54
weshayrf0lc0, before you do that..17:55
weshayshow me where it is for the standalone17:55
rf0lc0weshay, standalone has its own parent, multinode too17:55
weshayrf0lc0, show me17:55
rf0lc0searching17:55
weshayrlandy|rover, tempest timed out17:55
weshayfs00117:55
rf0lc0weshay, multinode is here https://github.com/openstack/tripleo-ci/blob/master/zuul.d/base.yaml#L18417:56
rf0lc0standalone https://github.com/openstack/tripleo-ci/blob/master/zuul.d/base.yaml#L37617:56
rf0lc0they were added to the direct parent17:56
weshayya.. ok17:57
*** Tengu has quit IRC17:57
weshayso you just followed that pattern ..17:57
rlandy|roverweshay: I think we can still promote17:57
*** Tengu has joined #oooq17:57
rlandy|roverI will rerun17:57
rlandy|roverit's timed out before17:58
weshayseems fine to me, rf0lc0 but does the undercloud use the multindoe-centos-8 base17:58
weshayrf0lc0, you may not have to do anything17:58
* weshay is not sure..17:58
rlandy|roverhttps://sf.hosted.upshift.rdu2.redhat.com/zuul/t/tripleo-ci-internal/builds?job_name=periodic-tripleo-ci-rhel-8-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001-internal-rhos-16.217:58
weshaybut worth checking17:58
rf0lc0no, undercloud parent is tripleo-ci-base-singlenode-centos-817:58
weshayrlandy|rover, can we increase the timeout on fs001?17:58
rlandy|roverweshay:ack - will do that on rerun17:58
weshayrlandy|rover, thanks17:58
weshayrf0lc0, so perhaps the singlenode-centos-8 base is the right place17:59
weshayya..17:59
weshayk17:59
rf0lc0weshay, the only concern is that parent is shared between many jobs, buildimage, many others like upgrade undercloud etc17:59
rlandy|roverperiodic-tripleo-centos-7-rocky-containers-build-pushtimed_out (non-voting)17:59
rlandy|roverweshay: ^^ any work do whether we can drop rocky?18:00
rlandy|roverword18:00
rlandy|roveron whether18:00
rlandy|roverqueens does fine18:00
weshayrf0lc0, ya.. centos-8 jobs should all be parent/child18:00
rlandy|roverrocky not so muhc18:00
rlandy|rovermuch18:00
weshayI would NOT say this is safe on centos-7 anything18:00
weshayrlandy|rover, ya.. ignore for now18:00
rlandy|roverweshay: great - thanks18:01
rf0lc0weshay, the intermediate layer would be a safer move IMHO, we only reparent off new layer the ones we want, undercloud containers in this case will be the first one... the rest will keep the original parent18:02
rf0lc0weshay, open to hear pros and cons18:02
rf0lc0I see only pros18:02
akahatrf0lc0, i went through your reviews.. i found c8 jobs there.. do you have any idea about c7 content provider jobs?18:07
rf0lc0akahat, c7 chandankumar was taking care of18:10
rf0lc0akahat, as soon as he confirms c7 jobs are moved to content provider, we can replicate in tripleo repos18:11
rf0lc0akahat, lets do it for c8 master first. Once we confirm all templates and jobs are good, we just replicate18:11
akahatrf0lc0, okay. that sounds good.18:12
rf0lc0for example.... undercloud is wip, depends on that patch... there is one ipa template that is not enabled yet.... exceptions will be handled as we find them18:13
ysandeepweshay, I am updating description of 16.2 pipeline to reflect now we run thrice- https://code.engineering.redhat.com/gerrit/#/c/214354/2/zuul.d/pipelines.yaml@14218:13
*** marios|out has quit IRC18:13
ysandeepweshay, Really good idea considering 16.2 will be delivered to our customers and once 16.2 is GA - Incase of bugs we want to deliver fixes as soon as possible.18:13
ysandeepweshay, ut I think this change will not help alone and second bit we need is auto promotions to current-tripleo in downstream.18:13
ysandeepBut*18:14
ysandeepRight now we are promoting tripleo-ci-testing to current-tripleo manually using script. So till we auto promote to me it make less sense to trigger the pipeline thrice. IMHO manually we can only consider promoting once a day. But yes running thrice increase our chances to promote on daily basis so +1 to your change from me as well18:14
rlandy|roverysandeep: just promoted 16.218:17
rlandy|roveronly advantage of running more is catching component promotions18:17
ysandeeprlandy|rover, thanks! i was just checking today's result - one job failed on tempest was checking that18:17
rlandy|roverysandeep: I reran tempest job18:18
rlandy|roverfs001 timedout on tempest18:18
rlandy|roverhappens often18:18
rlandy|roverlooking to increase timeout there18:18
ysandeeprlandy++18:19
*** yolanda has quit IRC18:21
rlandy|rovertimestamp: 1601988056': SUCCESSFUL promotion to current-tripleo-rdo18:23
rlandy|rover2020-10-07 18:11:30,110 28357 INFO     promoter Summary: Promoted 1 hashes this round18:23
rlandy|roverwoohoo18:23
rlandy|rover2 hours agonetwork13 hours ago - network promoted18:24
ysandeeprlandy|rover, weshay minor changes in pipeline description - https://code.engineering.redhat.com/gerrit/#/c/214464/18:31
weshayrlandy|rover, did we promote 16.2 w/ a failing fs001?18:32
weshayhttp://osp-trunk.hosted.upshift.rdu2.redhat.com/rhel8-osp16-2/18:34
weshay?18:35
*** ysandeep is now known as ysandeep|away18:38
rlandy|roverweshay: yes - it fails a lot18:44
rlandy|roverwell at least times out18:44
weshayrlandy|rover, it's not criteria?18:44
rlandy|roverweshay: criteria on downstream??18:45
rlandy|roverit's whatever we chose it to be at the moment18:45
weshaylet's chat18:45
rlandy|roverthe promoter script does not ask18:45
weshayhttps://meet.google.com/arm-zkto-vnu?authuser=118:46
rf0lc0sshnaidm, I'll step on your toe a little18:59
sshnaidmrf0lc0, is it painful?18:59
rf0lc0sshnaidm, content provider templates and jobs on tq and tqe18:59
rf0lc0sshnaidm, you tell me19:00
rf0lc0if it hurts you yell19:00
rlandy|roverweshay: https://code.engineering.redhat.com/gerrit/#/c/214472/19:01
rlandy|roverweshay: https://code.engineering.redhat.com/gerrit/21447719:17
*** tosky has joined #oooq19:26
weshayrlandy|rover, just merged https://code.engineering.redhat.com/gerrit/#/c/214199/19:44
weshaythose are running just 1 tempest test https://logserver.rdoproject.org/openstack-component-network/opendev.org/openstack/tripleo-ci/master/periodic-tripleo-ci-centos-8-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001-network-train/fd93077/logs/undercloud/var/log/tempest/stestr_results.html.gz19:45
rlandy|roverok19:46
rlandy|roveroh - and the ovb change as well  - thanks19:47
rlandy|roverweshay: I'll take https://code.engineering.redhat.com/gerrit/#/c/214449/ - need to make that depends -on the definitions19:48
* rlandy|rover goes to bank ... brb19:50
*** rlandy|rover is now known as rlandy|rover|brb19:50
*** apetrich has quit IRC20:06
*** jbadiapa has quit IRC20:33
*** rlandy|rover|brb is now known as rlandy|rover20:40
*** TrevorV has quit IRC21:00
rlandy|roverweshay: soniya29|ruck: fyi ... https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1898931 - not sure is this is consistent yet21:08
openstackLaunchpad bug 1898931 in tripleo "periodic-tripleo-ci-centos-8-scenario003-standalone-master is failing overcloud deploy "Service mistral_executor has not started yet"" [Undecided,Triaged]21:08
weshayrlandy|rover, I think mistral is gone...21:08
weshayrlandy|rover, we may need to look for that patch and make sure it's removed from scenario003 env21:09
rlandy|roverweshay: patch?21:09
rlandy|roverlike in THT?21:09
rlandy|roverweshay: https://github.com/openstack/tripleo-heat-templates/blob/master/ci/environments/scenario003-standalone.yaml#L921:10
weshayrlandy|rover, I think kevin was tearing it out.. I saw something last week about it21:12
rlandy|roverweshay: k - will ask him - thanks21:12
weshayrlandy|rover, apparently setting last hashes to anything to over 100 causes... and indexOutOfRange error on the promoter21:31
rlandy|rovernice21:31
rlandy|rover100 should be good enough21:31
weshayrlandy|rover, ussuri is promoting.. not quite out of the woods w/ minor tweaks.. but getting there21:31
weshayya21:31
rlandy|roveroif it runs regularly21:31
rlandy|rovercool21:31
weshayit's current-tripleo.. will rerun to get rdo21:32
weshayok.. ussuri rdo promoting21:38
weshaystill funkyness21:38
rlandy|rover https://code.engineering.redhat.com/gerrit/214492 WIP: Add  missing OVB jobs:21:55
rlandy|roverweshay: ^^21:55
*** Goneri has quit IRC22:01
*** dsneddon has quit IRC22:06
*** dsneddon has joined #oooq22:08
*** tosky has quit IRC22:22
*** holser has quit IRC22:28
*** Goneri has joined #oooq22:34
*** rlandy|rover has quit IRC23:02

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.2 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!