*** chem has quit IRC | 00:43 | |
*** chem has joined #oooq | 00:45 | |
*** jmasud has joined #oooq | 00:48 | |
*** jmasud has quit IRC | 00:53 | |
*** jmasud has joined #oooq | 01:05 | |
*** jmasud has quit IRC | 01:14 | |
*** jmasud has joined #oooq | 01:16 | |
*** jmasud has quit IRC | 01:20 | |
*** jmasud has joined #oooq | 01:25 | |
*** jmasud has quit IRC | 01:32 | |
*** jmasud has joined #oooq | 01:33 | |
*** jmasud has quit IRC | 01:53 | |
*** jmasud has joined #oooq | 02:09 | |
*** jmasud has quit IRC | 02:15 | |
*** jmasud has joined #oooq | 02:18 | |
*** jmasud has quit IRC | 02:20 | |
*** jmasud has joined #oooq | 02:25 | |
*** jmasud has quit IRC | 02:30 | |
*** apetrich has quit IRC | 03:19 | |
*** udesale has joined #oooq | 04:45 | |
*** jmasud has joined #oooq | 04:54 | |
*** ykarel has joined #oooq | 04:57 | |
*** ratailor has joined #oooq | 05:31 | |
*** skramaja has joined #oooq | 05:49 | |
*** jmasud has quit IRC | 06:08 | |
*** ysandeep|away is now known as ysandeep | 06:11 | |
*** marios has joined #oooq | 06:20 | |
* ysandeep wondering if we can restore someone else patch? | 06:24 | |
bhagyashris | ysandeep, i think owner and cores having those rights to restore the any ones patch | 07:17 |
---|---|---|
ysandeep | bhagyashris, thanks! | 07:17 |
chandankumar | ysandeep: which one needs to be restored? | 07:17 |
ysandeep | chandankumar, thanks!.. i will request owner to restore.. | 07:18 |
*** slaweq has joined #oooq | 07:43 | |
*** jmasud has joined #oooq | 07:47 | |
*** amoralej|off is now known as amoralej | 08:01 | |
*** jpena|off is now known as jpena | 08:17 | |
*** ysandeep is now known as ysandeep|lunch | 08:18 | |
*** jfrancoa has joined #oooq | 08:26 | |
zbr|rover | bhagyashris: hi! | 09:02 |
zbr|rover | that issue with timeout is very weird, i am looking at build history on https://review.rdoproject.org/zuul/builds?job_name=tox-py36-ci-config&project=rdo-infra/ci-config | 09:02 |
zbr|rover | i see previous execution times of ~4-5minutes | 09:03 |
zbr|rover | with your patch, it passed in ~20mins, but i see failures at 30min and 60min, what is the real timeout 30 or 06? | 09:03 |
bhagyashris | zbr|rover, which patch you are talking | 09:04 |
bhagyashris | zbr|rover, on this patch it never passed | 09:05 |
zbr|rover | https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/31399/ | 09:05 |
bhagyashris | zbr|rover, but with patch it's passing https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/31399/ | 09:05 |
bhagyashris | on this https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/28014/ patch it never passed | 09:06 |
bhagyashris | zbr|rover, on this patch it's passing https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/31399/ and i haven't changed any timeout value | 09:06 |
zbr|rover | yep, at least once :D, but i will workflow it and we can investigate more on the follow-up i created | 09:07 |
zbr|rover | my main concern was that using old resolver is hack, and that it may have a boomerang effect later. | 09:07 |
bhagyashris | zbr|rover, yeah | 09:09 |
zbr|rover | bit of mind blowing | 09:09 |
zbr|rover | i need to identify which version of pip it used when it failed. i am unable to make it fail locally. | 09:09 |
bhagyashris | same zbr|rover even i am unable to make it fail locally | 09:10 |
bhagyashris | not sure why it's hitting in zuul | 09:10 |
bhagyashris | Using pip 20.3.1 from /home/zuul/src/review.rdoproject.org/rdo-infra/ci-config/.tox/py36/lib/python3.6/site-packages/pip (python 3.6) | 09:13 |
bhagyashris | https://logserver.rdoproject.org/58/31358/9/check/tox-py36-ci-config/cd11408/tox/py36-1.log | 09:13 |
bhagyashris | here is more details https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1908274/comments/4 | 09:14 |
openstack | Launchpad bug 1908274 in tripleo "tox-py36-ci-config job is broken " [Critical,Triaged] | 09:14 |
*** slaweq has quit IRC | 09:16 | |
chandankumar | zbr|rover: bhagyashris I was thinking to merge the old deps resolver and then make the job passing and then start fixing the stuf based on new resolver to unblock the patches | 09:16 |
*** derekh has joined #oooq | 09:17 | |
zbr|rover | chandankumar: i already +W it, it will merge soon. | 09:17 |
chandankumar | zbr|rover: thanks :-) | 09:17 |
chandankumar | bhagyashris: I will help on splitting the jobs based on different projects | 09:18 |
bhagyashris | chandankumar, zbr|rover thanks ! :) | 09:18 |
bhagyashris | chandankumar, ack | 09:18 |
*** slaweq has joined #oooq | 09:18 | |
bhagyashris | marios, fyi, work around patch https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/31399/ got merge. you can rebase your patch :) | 09:20 |
*** slaweq has quit IRC | 09:20 | |
zbr|rover | i am considering something I already use on other projects: a lock file and use of pip-tools for updating dependencies. | 09:20 |
zbr|rover | this means no longer depending on pip to install whatever is latest and always using what passed last time | 09:21 |
zbr|rover | this will avoid any endless attempts to find working dependencies, because they are pinned. | 09:21 |
*** ysandeep|lunch is now known as ysandeep | 09:22 | |
zbr|rover | btw, why we are using upper constraints from openstack? i bet this is the cause of the conflicts | 09:23 |
zbr|rover | these constraints may conflicts with what we need, and can be changes outside our power. | 09:23 |
zbr|rover | especially for ci-config which tests only our internal code, it makes no sense on depending on them. | 09:24 |
zbr|rover | interesting fact, my pip is also stuck.... | 09:24 |
*** slaweq has joined #oooq | 09:25 | |
zbr|rover | yes: i commented the -c... line and works fine. | 09:26 |
zbr|rover | it is ok to use constraint files, but only if we are the ones producing them. | 09:26 |
marios | thanks bhagyashris | 09:37 |
marios | chandankumar: bhagyashris: so in the end we went with legacy resolver not updating pip/setuptool with download true | 09:38 |
chandankumar | marios: yes correct | 09:39 |
zbr|rover | marios: wait few minutes, i will have a long term fix | 09:39 |
marios | chandankumar: ack thanks either way good to be unblocked :) | 09:39 |
marios | zbr|rover: ack | 09:39 |
marios | zbr|rover: please add some info or track whatever fix you poste there https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1908274/comments/8 | 09:42 |
openstack | Launchpad bug 1908274 in tripleo "tox-py36-ci-config job is broken " [Critical,Fix released] | 09:42 |
*** jmasud has quit IRC | 10:00 | |
*** jmasud has joined #oooq | 10:04 | |
*** jmasud has quit IRC | 10:31 | |
*** jmasud has joined #oooq | 10:38 | |
*** slaweq has quit IRC | 10:51 | |
*** slaweq has joined #oooq | 10:56 | |
*** ysandeep is now known as ysandeep|afk | 11:24 | |
zbr|rover | marios: bhagyashris chandankumar: please check the fix for deps install: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/31400/ | 11:26 |
zbr|rover | let me know if further explanation is needed, i am happy to even explain on meet if needed | 11:26 |
chandankumar | zbr|rover: just one thing, we are working on breaking the jobs in 3 parts | 11:30 |
chandankumar | so i think we can also move the pip compile generated in 3 parts | 11:31 |
chandankumar | as your patch looks good apart from that pip compiled test requirements file | 11:31 |
zbr|rover | nope: rebuilding deps will be done manually whenever we want | 11:32 |
zbr|rover | they would change too often to include them in automation. | 11:32 |
*** udesale_ has joined #oooq | 11:32 | |
chandankumar | zbr|rover: ok | 11:33 |
marios | zbr|rover: ack will do | 11:33 |
zbr|rover | i do have an example with far less deps that has an automated pipeline, look at https://github.com/ansible-community/toolset/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aclosed | 11:33 |
zbr|rover | based on how many we have, we would have like 5-10 changes per day to keep it fresh. | 11:34 |
zbr|rover | can we cope with that?... | 11:34 |
zbr|rover | basically we control when we bump them, basically only when we need. | 11:35 |
*** udesale has quit IRC | 11:35 | |
*** jmasud has quit IRC | 11:43 | |
chandankumar | stepping out for a bit, back in 30 mins | 11:52 |
*** ykarel_ has joined #oooq | 12:14 | |
*** ykarel has quit IRC | 12:17 | |
*** ykarel_ is now known as ykarel | 12:18 | |
*** ratailor has quit IRC | 12:26 | |
chandankumar | zbr|rover: does the collect-logs issue got fixed? | 12:35 |
zbr|rover | chandankumar: not be me for sure | 12:36 |
zbr|rover | going out for a few mins for lunch | 12:36 |
*** rfolco has joined #oooq | 12:37 | |
chandankumar | ok | 12:39 |
*** tosky has joined #oooq | 12:58 | |
*** jpena is now known as jpena|lunch | 13:00 | |
*** ysandeep|afk is now known as ysandeep | 13:00 | |
weshay|ruck | akahat|ruck, zbr|rover as you have time.. I'll need an update so I know what to push/watch before you go | 13:19 |
chandankumar | weshay|ruck: do you have the link of collect-logs bug link handy? | 13:22 |
weshay|ruck | I should.. /me looks at ss | 13:22 |
weshay|ruck | chandankumar, https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1908054 | 13:24 |
openstack | Launchpad bug 1908054 in tripleo "Collect logs failing to collect logs" [Critical,Triaged] | 13:24 |
chandankumar | weshay|ruck: thanks! | 13:24 |
weshay|ruck | chandankumar, I think sshnaidm fixed it yesterday.. fix = has patch | 13:24 |
weshay|ruck | chandankumar, https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-role-collect-logs/+/767580 | 13:25 |
chandankumar | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-role-collect-logs/+/767580 | 13:25 |
chandankumar | weshay|ruck: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ci/+/767456 | 13:26 |
chandankumar | weshay|ruck: https://a455f3929f61c821afa0-d5237dd035b9f3c7532839ca52b23c88.ssl.cf2.rackcdn.com/767456/2/gate/tripleo-ci-centos-8-content-provider-ussuri/2a933c6/logs/index.html | 13:26 |
chandankumar | https://322149cf6bb5d1d418ae-1e96e5dddd851f74afd1442b0a5110b5.ssl.cf1.rackcdn.com/767456/2/gate/tripleo-ci-centos-8-content-provider-train/a125d83/logs/index.html | 13:26 |
chandankumar | no logs here | 13:27 |
chandankumar | collect logs merged recently | 13:28 |
chandankumar | so might be that patch is not used there | 13:28 |
*** sanjayu_ has quit IRC | 13:29 | |
weshay|ruck | chandankumar, | 13:29 |
weshay|ruck | 2020-12-18 05:19:34.584224 | primary -> localhost | To git+ssh://199.204.45.243:22//home/zuul/src/opendev.org/openstack/ansible-role-collect-logs | 13:29 |
weshay|ruck | 2020-12-18 05:19:34.584320 | primary -> localhost | 09a8861..61e3cc3 master -> master | 13:29 |
weshay|ruck | 2020-12-18 05:19:34.584429 | primary -> localhost | * [new branch] origin/master -> origin/master | 13:29 |
weshay|ruck | 2020-12-18 05:19:34.584522 | primary -> localhost | * [new branch] refs/zuul/4f26aeafdb2367620a393c973eddbe8f8b846ebd -> refs/zuul/4f26aeafdb2367620a393c973eddbe8f8b846ebd | 13:29 |
weshay|ruck | hrm.. | 13:29 |
weshay|ruck | dont see that commit at all in the repo | 13:30 |
*** skramaja has quit IRC | 13:32 | |
weshay|ruck | chandankumar, what hash is checked out? | 13:33 |
chandankumar | opendev.org/openstack/ansible-role-collect-logs checked out to: | 13:34 |
chandankumar | 2020-12-18 05:19:52.009491 | primary | 61e3cc33bdd9b9082299a377dc916b16782dd827 Remove --size from container command | 13:34 |
chandankumar | weshay|ruck: sagi fix is there | 13:35 |
weshay|ruck | u sure? | 13:35 |
* weshay|ruck looks | 13:35 | |
chandankumar | https://a455f3929f61c821afa0-d5237dd035b9f3c7532839ca52b23c88.ssl.cf2.rackcdn.com/767456/2/gate/tripleo-ci-centos-8-content-provider-ussuri/2a933c6/job-output.txt | 13:35 |
chandankumar | 2020-12-18 05:19:52.009491 | primary | 61e3cc33bdd9b9082299a377dc916b16782dd827 Remove --size from container command | 13:35 |
*** amoralej is now known as amoralej|lunch | 13:36 | |
chandankumar | weshay|ruck: ^^ | 13:37 |
chandankumar | let me check other passed jobs | 13:37 |
weshay|ruck | chandankumar, you are debugging https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ci/+/767456 | 13:37 |
weshay|ruck | ? | 13:37 |
chandankumar | weshay|ruck: nope I was rechecking the failed one | 13:38 |
chandankumar | then I was looking for collect-logs issue | 13:38 |
weshay|ruck | tripleo-ci-centos-8-content-provider-train | 13:38 |
weshay|ruck | ah and ussuri | 13:38 |
weshay|ruck | ya | 13:38 |
weshay|ruck | chandankumar, ya.. they worked this time | 13:39 |
chandankumar | not sure what is going on there | 13:39 |
weshay|ruck | chandankumar, ya.. we need to increase the pass rates on content-providers | 13:39 |
weshay|ruck | chandankumar, although.. I see it's getting better.. we still need to be mindful | 13:40 |
weshay|ruck | last 24 hours.. /me notes latest zuul results not included | 13:40 |
weshay|ruck | centos-8-provider 100% w/ 19 jobs | 13:40 |
weshay|ruck | in gate | 13:40 |
weshay|ruck | ussuri / train are at 79% and 77% | 13:41 |
chandankumar | weshay|ruck: kopecmartin soniya29 akahat|ruck fyi https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-config/+/767665 glance tempest plugin coming | 13:41 |
weshay|ruck | chandankumar, I suspect the lack of promotion | 13:41 |
weshay|ruck | chandankumar, nice | 13:41 |
weshay|ruck | zbr|rover, akahat|ruck let's chat | 13:41 |
akahat|ruck | weshay|ruck, okay | 13:41 |
akahat|ruck | chandankumar, ack | 13:41 |
rfolco | ysandeep, can you tell me what is the equivalent job in downstream (code eng) to the container build ubi8 upstream ? | 13:41 |
weshay|ruck | https://meet.google.com/gpw-bvet-zzr?authuser=1 | 13:42 |
rfolco | periodic-tripleo-build-containers-rhel-8-master ? | 13:42 |
chandankumar | weshay|ruck: train and ussuri is not promoted from last 14 days | 13:42 |
weshay|ruck | chandankumar, ya.. I know | 13:42 |
weshay|ruck | they haven't built | 13:42 |
rfolco | ysandeep, or this ? tripleo-build-containers-ubi-8-internal | 13:42 |
chandankumar | weshay|ruck: container build is still stuck? | 13:43 |
rfolco | ysandeep, maybe this one ? tripleo-build-containers-ubi-8-internal-rhel-8-rhos-17 | 13:43 |
weshay|ruck | chandankumar, yes sir | 13:43 |
chandankumar | oh no | 13:43 |
ysandeep | rfolco, yes this one for 17 | 13:43 |
weshay|ruck | chandankumar, buildah | 13:43 |
rfolco | ysandeep, tripleo-build-containers-ubi-8-internal-rhel-8-rhos-17 ? | 13:43 |
ysandeep | rfolco, yes | 13:43 |
rfolco | ysandeep, cool, thanks | 13:44 |
ysandeep | rfolco, tripleo-build-containers-ubi-8-internal-rhel-8-rhos-16.2 for 16 | 13:44 |
rfolco | ysandeep, ok will run both, and what about one for older branches that still use kolla ? | 13:44 |
ysandeep | rfolco, afaik.. we only have 16.2 and 17 pipelines in downstream.. sshnaidm setup 13 line for operator work.. but i am not sure they have container build job there or not | 13:46 |
rfolco | ysandeep, ok I think these 2 are enough | 13:46 |
rfolco | ysandeep, thanks :) | 13:46 |
weshay|ruck | akahat|ruck, zbr|rover https://storage.bhs.cloud.ovh.net/v1/AUTH_dcaab5e32b234d56b626f72581e3644c/zuul_opendev_logs_8f4/767679/1/check/tripleo-ci-centos-8-containers-multinode/8f43a97/logs/undercloud/etc/yum.repos.d/index.html | 13:50 |
*** jpena|lunch is now known as jpena | 14:00 | |
weshay|ruck | akahat|ruck, marios, on monday can we chat about http://dashboard-ci.tripleo.org/d/Z4vLSmOGk/cockpit?orgId=1&from=now-90d&to=now&var-launchpad_tags=alert&var-releases=master&var-promotion_names=current-tripleo&var-promotion_names=current-tripleo-rdo&var-influxdb_filter=branch%7C%3D%7Cstable%2Ftrain&var-influxdb_filter=job_name%7C%3D~%7C%2F.*upgrade.*%2F | 14:07 |
marios | weshay|ruck: sure... but it is centos7... i think we should ask the upgrade team. if they don't want/care, let's nuke | 14:13 |
marios | weshay|ruck: i don't think they know/want/care | 14:13 |
weshay|ruck | marios, rock.. good plan | 14:14 |
soniya29 | chandankumar, that's great | 14:14 |
*** amoralej|lunch is now known as amoralej | 14:18 | |
rfolco | chandankumar, my 'job.provider_job' when clause is skipping... https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ci/+/767591/1/playbooks/tripleo-ci/post.yaml, any thoughts ? | 14:21 |
rfolco | provider_job: true in https://storage.gra.cloud.ovh.net/v1/AUTH_dcaab5e32b234d56b626f72581e3644c/zuul_opendev_logs_36a/767591/1/check/tripleo-ci-centos-8-content-provider/36a02a0/zuul-info/inventory.yaml | 14:21 |
*** ysandeep is now known as ysandeep|away | 14:22 | |
rfolco | 2020-12-17 21:22:56.530040 | TASK [Build report] | 14:22 |
rfolco | 2020-12-17 21:22:56.602400 | localhost | skipping: Conditional result was False | 14:22 |
chandankumar | rfolco: may be the provider_job value is not passed in the post playbook | 14:25 |
chandankumar | rfolco: can be make cacheable is to true somewhere? | 14:25 |
rfolco | chandankumar, I thought provider_job var was a job definition in the zuul files | 14:26 |
chandankumar | rfolco: yes it is | 14:26 |
rfolco | chandankumar, why post can't see it then | 14:27 |
ykarel | rfolco, try provider_job instead of job.provider_job, as that's how it visible to ci playbooks, for quickstart u can use job.provider_job | 14:27 |
rfolco | ykarel, oh cool, thanks :) | 14:28 |
chandankumar | ykarel: yes, thanks :-) | 14:28 |
rfolco | chandankumar, thx bro | 14:30 |
*** udesale_ has quit IRC | 14:38 | |
weshay|ruck | zbr|rover, did you by chance fix tripleo-tox-molecule | 15:05 |
zbr|rover | weshay|ruck: which repo my memory started to become bit fuzzy | 15:07 |
weshay|ruck | zbr|rover, V | 15:07 |
weshay|ruck | 767456 | 15:07 |
zbr|rover | yeah, change is fixing it but failed to merge due to unrelated reason | 15:08 |
zbr|rover | it is bit tricky as we still need to fix tripleo-repos | 15:09 |
zbr|rover | that one only fixes the job and switching testing of tripleo-repos from c7 to c8 | 15:09 |
zbr|rover | when ideally we should test it on both | 15:09 |
zbr|rover | at this moment tripleo-repo changes are not tested against centos-7, so is easy to break it. | 15:12 |
zbr|rover | in fact this is what happened | 15:12 |
zbr|rover | weshay|ruck: take a look at https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-repos/+/674571 -- two important bits: comment from alex and the age of the change. | 15:13 |
zbr|rover | one year ago alex argued that we don't need molecule testing on it, now we have failures as changes that broke it were introduced. | 15:14 |
weshay|ruck | zbr|rover, raise it to the ptl | 15:15 |
weshay|ruck | marios, ^ | 15:15 |
zbr|rover | ability to test that we can configure repos should not take more than 10 mins to run | 15:16 |
marios | k | 15:16 |
marios | zbr|rover: consider adding a note in https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tripleo-meeting-items and if folks don't show up in the meeting tuesday we can reach out for a discussion with DF | 15:19 |
zbr|rover | added a note | 15:23 |
marios | thanks | 15:23 |
marios | http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-December/019522.html [tripleo] next meeting Tuesday Dec 22 @ 1400 UTC in #tripleo | 15:26 |
marios | Please consider adding your news/blockers/plans in https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tripleo-meeting-items even if you cannot attend. | 15:26 |
marios | needs votes please https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/31358/ but weshay|ruck it will have to be manually changed on the promoter anyway right? | 15:35 |
weshay|ruck | marios, no.. components don't use the promoter | 15:37 |
marios | weshay|ruck: yes i know they don't (we have job to do that) but the criteria file lives there or not at all? | 15:38 |
weshay|ruck | marios, please check.. afaik.. it's done from src in the component proomtion jobs.. rfolco would know off the top of his head | 15:39 |
marios | weshay|ruck: i mean that http://38.145.34.55/config/CentOS-8/component/ ... i guess it isn't used at all in the promoter or referenced | 15:39 |
marios | weshay|ruck: yeah i am just confused because all the criteria is cloned for the promoter there ^^^ | 15:39 |
marios | weshay|ruck: even if it isn't used | 15:39 |
marios | weshay|ruck: k thanks | 15:39 |
weshay|ruck | np | 15:40 |
rfolco | weshay|ruck, marios my memory chip is from 80's, don't know, need to look. I assume these criteria files under component/ are not used... not sure | 15:43 |
weshay|ruck | rfolco, why would you think they are not used? | 15:43 |
weshay|ruck | lolz | 15:43 |
weshay|ruck | jebus | 15:43 |
weshay|ruck | maybe you mean on the promoter.. | 15:44 |
rfolco | yes | 15:44 |
weshay|ruck | aye | 15:44 |
rfolco | the promoter | 15:44 |
weshay|ruck | k | 15:44 |
weshay|ruck | rfolco, the jobs you wrote iirc get criteria from src | 15:44 |
rfolco | weshay|ruck, don't remember even that I wrote those... I'm getting old | 15:45 |
weshay|ruck | rfolco, take some ginseng and look :) | 15:45 |
rfolco | I don't know what had for dinner yesterday if you ask me | 15:45 |
weshay|ruck | lolz | 15:45 |
weshay|ruck | VHAT YOU SAY YOUNG MAN | 15:45 |
weshay|ruck | back in my day sunny... and other old'ism | 15:46 |
rfolco | :) | 15:46 |
weshay|ruck | OK.. taking bets on tripleo c8 train pass rate after being down for 2 weeks | 15:48 |
marios | all in | 15:48 |
weshay|ruck | marios, what % pass/fail | 15:49 |
marios | weshay|ruck: i read it too quickly on first pass i thought it was 'for promotion' but w/e | 15:50 |
chandankumar | see ya all on thursday, Have a nice weekend & holidays ahead :-) | 16:53 |
*** chandankumar is now known as raukadah | 16:53 | |
*** rlandy has joined #oooq | 16:58 | |
weshay|ruck | ChanServ, 0/ | 16:59 |
weshay|ruck | raukadah, 0/ | 16:59 |
*** jfrancoa has quit IRC | 17:01 | |
marios | have a good one tripleo-ci see you monday | 17:01 |
*** marios is now known as marios|out | 17:01 | |
*** jpena is now known as jpena|off | 17:16 | |
rfolco | weshay|ruck, pls review https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ci/+/755124 --> testproject and codeeng test works, so not breaking anything. Will ask for reviews next week, hopefully we can merge by Tue/Wed. | 17:20 |
rfolco | weshay|ruck, content provider report is another story, working in a separate patch | 17:20 |
weshay|ruck | ah k | 17:20 |
weshay|ruck | thanks for clarifying | 17:20 |
rfolco | weshay|ruck, do a first pass and if any respin I can get it ready for Monday. Thanks !! | 17:21 |
rfolco | codeeng >> https://code.engineering.redhat.com/gerrit/#/c/221752 | 17:22 |
rfolco | testproject >> https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/29840/ | 17:22 |
*** marios|out has quit IRC | 17:29 | |
*** jmasud has joined #oooq | 17:30 | |
*** derekh has quit IRC | 17:31 | |
*** amoralej is now known as amoralej|off | 17:52 | |
*** ykarel has quit IRC | 18:28 | |
weshay|ruck | rfolco, I forget if the skiplist will work w/o full tempest test names | 19:31 |
weshay|ruck | I think so right.. but it was just harder to remove | 19:32 |
rfolco | weshay|ruck, I always use full name, but I think it works w/ partial names too like classes of tests | 19:32 |
weshay|ruck | ya.. it should.. cool thanks | 19:33 |
*** jmasud has quit IRC | 19:43 | |
weshay|ruck | thanks fixed | 19:45 |
*** jmasud has joined #oooq | 19:46 | |
*** rlandy has quit IRC | 20:14 | |
*** rfolco has quit IRC | 20:40 | |
*** rfolco has joined #oooq | 20:40 | |
*** jmasud has quit IRC | 20:53 | |
*** slaweq has quit IRC | 20:54 | |
*** jmasud has joined #oooq | 21:11 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.2 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!