| *** ykarel|away is now known as ykarel | 04:37 | |
| *** marios is now known as marios|ruck | 05:23 | |
| *** ysandeep|out is now known as ysandeep | 05:52 | |
| *** amoralej|off is now known as amoralej | 06:38 | |
| *** jpena|off is now known as jpena | 06:56 | |
| anbanerj|rover | marios|ruck, O/ | 07:18 |
|---|---|---|
| anbanerj|rover | marios|ruck, tripleo-buildimage-overcloud-hardened-uefi-full-centos-8 has failed 4-5 times with No config file ...overcloud-hardened-images-uefi-centos8 I am creating a bug for it | 07:22 |
| marios|ruck | anbanerj|rover: ack thank you it is very new so if it persists we can just move to non voting and ping sbaker | 07:24 |
| *** bhagyashris_ is now known as bhagyashris | 08:27 | |
| *** ykarel is now known as ykarel|lunch | 08:52 | |
| marios|ruck | anbanerj|rover: biab getting some food | 09:17 |
| * zbr had a 'good' start today, uncovering a python bug https://bugs.python.org/issue44497 | 09:23 | |
| *** ykarel|lunch is now known as ykarel | 09:56 | |
| marios|ruck | thanks anbanerj|rover | 10:11 |
| marios|ruck | anbanerj|rover: o/ are you ok for the program call today? | 10:29 |
| marios|ruck | anbanerj|rover: i mean are you ok to give our status? | 10:29 |
| marios|ruck | anbanerj|rover: (email from weshay|ruck ) | 10:29 |
| anbanerj|rover | marios|ruck, I was checking the promotions. Master and train look ok - 2 days ago. Do we need to promote ussuri today? | 10:30 |
| marios|ruck | anbanerj|rover: yeah ussuri is quite old | 10:31 |
| anbanerj|rover | do we need to get a promotion before the program call? | 10:31 |
| marios|ruck | anbanerj|rover: but the ones we care about for the program call are train and master/wallaby so no need to mention anything else | 10:31 |
| marios|ruck | anbanerj|rover: no | 10:32 |
| ysandeep | anbanerj|rover: fyi.. weshay|ruck usually add status what we need to report.. we don't report ussuri in program call | 10:32 |
| marios|ruck | anbanerj|rover: the status is already updated there | 10:32 |
| anbanerj|rover | ok, got it | 10:32 |
| marios|ruck | ysandeep: well he didn't always ;) normally the ruck|rover prepares that status but yeah weshay|ruck is helping us by doing it | 10:32 |
| ysandeep | marios|ruck: o/ | 10:35 |
| ysandeep | i just checked he updated the doc already , weshay++ | 10:35 |
| anbanerj|rover | ysandeep, marios|ruck yes the doc is updated. I know abt the vexhost and the octavia issues. And the outage on thursday. What is happening for osp 17? | 10:37 |
| anbanerj|rover | Is this the s=dashboard http://tripleo-cockpit.usersys.redhat.com/d/v8gltz4Mz/rhos-17-full-component-pipeline?orgId=1 ? | 10:37 |
| ysandeep | anbanerj|rover: there are some ongoing cix card for 17 currently worked upon, apart from that we have promoted component this week to refresh builds. | 10:39 |
| *** pojadhav is now known as pojadhav|afk | 10:41 | |
| marios|ruck | ysandeep: don't really need to report on that osp17 i mean | 10:41 |
| anbanerj|rover | thanks | 10:41 |
| marios|ruck | sorry anbanerj|rover | 10:41 |
| marios|ruck | anbanerj|rover: you should only report for train & osp16 | 10:41 |
| marios|ruck | anbanerj|rover: 17 is blocked but it is blocked for everyeone still so not a big deal | 10:42 |
| marios|ruck | anbanerj|rover: not a big deal for us i mean, yet | 10:42 |
| marios|ruck | anbanerj|rover: for the "outage on thursday" let me update actually we haven't hear back from vexx yet | 10:42 |
| marios|ruck | jpena: did we hear back from vex re the upgrade? I don't see something in the cix card | 10:43 |
| marios|ruck | jpena: for the "potential disruption" was meant to be last week | 10:43 |
| anbanerj|rover | marios|ruck, ok. For train and master we are good - we had promotions on monday | 10:43 |
| jpena | marios|ruck: no, this is getting weird :-/. I asked about it on Monday, they said ". We have now forwarded this once more to our team so they can confirm the possibility of the upgrade this coming Friday, June 25. We'll let you know once the team confirmed the details." | 10:52 |
| marios|ruck | jpena: ack thanks | 10:53 |
| marios|ruck | jpena: so its fine i was just wondering as we are reporting in the program call in case we had specific news | 10:54 |
| marios|ruck | jpena: thank you for dealing with that ticket | 10:54 |
| anbanerj|rover | jpena, marios|ruck thanks | 10:55 |
| *** amoralej is now known as amoralej|lunch | 11:28 | |
| *** jpena is now known as jpena|lunch | 11:30 | |
| *** dviroel|out is now known as dviroel | 11:37 | |
| cgoncalves | marios|ruck, | 11:51 |
| cgoncalves | oops, sorry :) | 11:51 |
| marios|ruck | o/ cgoncalves | 11:53 |
| cgoncalves | marios|ruck, weshay|ruck: what do you think about making tripleo-ci-centos-8-standalone-on-multinode-ipa voting? it caught a regression but it was overlooked. see https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1933330 | 11:53 |
| weshay|ruck | cgoncalves, we were just talking about it yesterday | 11:54 |
| weshay|ruck | rlandy, was proposing making it voting yesterday ^ :) | 11:54 |
| marios|ruck | cgoncalves: so yes but we should make it stable first? | 11:54 |
| marios|ruck | cgoncalves: weshay|ruck: doesn't look very stable here https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=tripleo-ci-centos-8-standalone-on-multinode-ipa | 11:54 |
| rlandy | weshay|ruck: marios|ruck: yep - might be in a place where it's worth making it voting on certain repos | 11:55 |
| cgoncalves | marios|ruck, I think it is stable, see https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=tripleo-ci-centos-8-standalone-on-multinode-ipa&branch=master | 11:55 |
| cgoncalves | the last builds failed most likely because of the regression I mentioned ^ | 11:55 |
| marios|ruck | cgoncalves: so you want to make it stable only for master? | 11:56 |
| rlandy | ade_lee was investigating another real issue the test caught | 11:56 |
| weshay|ruck | rlandy, blood sweat and twears rlandy++ | 11:56 |
| marios|ruck | cgoncalves: ack anyway no push back from me if the job is stable yes but probably we should fix that bug first then cos 14:54 < marios|ruck> cgoncalves: weshay|ruck: doesn't look very stable here https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=tripleo-ci-centos-8-standalone-on-multinode-ipa | 11:56 |
| rlandy | twears? | 11:56 |
| rlandy | wear and tear + tears? | 11:56 |
| rlandy | exactly | 11:56 |
| cgoncalves | marios|ruck, no, it would be best if voting in all branches | 11:57 |
| marios|ruck | cgoncalves: k just checking cos you pointed to master | 11:57 |
| weshay|ruck | marios|ruck, 0/ any luck w/ a molecule playbook/role to fix tox? | 11:57 |
| rlandy | marios|ruck: weshay|ruck: so the job is down to 68% pass but I think the errors are legit | 11:57 |
| weshay|ruck | I need to dig into molecule | 11:58 |
| marios|ruck | weshay|ruck: btw https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/testproject/+/34256 did use the right hash (i mean 'container_build_id is the one we passed' but th eproblem is with get_hash role and reporting to delorean, am digging abit there) | 11:58 |
| weshay|ruck | OH | 11:58 |
| weshay|ruck | well that's cool | 11:58 |
| marios|ruck | weshay|ruck: so it just ignores the thing you passed and reports to delorean with the current value of ci-testing | 11:58 |
| weshay|ruck | marios|ruck, if the yum repos are correct and the containers are correct.. we would be safe to waive the tests on the promoter | 11:59 |
| marios|ruck | weshay|ruck: well the containers are i think the yum repos are but we don't have the md5 there just he actual delorean.repo so i am not 1000% about that | 11:59 |
| weshay|ruck | marios|ruck, if you want to do that... just tell anbanerj|rover or akahat | 12:00 |
| marios|ruck | weshay|ruck: but for sure the reporting to delorean is wrong/ignores what you pass | 12:00 |
| *** marios|ruck is now known as marios|ruck|call | 12:00 | |
| rlandy | marios|ruck|call: cgoncalves: weshay|ruck: here is the patch to make the ipa job voting again ... https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ci/+/762766 - I removed my w-1 | 12:00 |
| cgoncalves | rlandy, thanks! | 12:01 |
| marios|ruck|call | rlandy: ack adding to queue | 12:03 |
| rlandy | marios|ruck|call: lol - you voted ages ago :) but will leave it to ruck/rovers to w+ since they will have to deal with the fallout | 12:03 |
| zbr | weshay|ruck: fix delayed by bug i found in molecule... | 12:10 |
| chandankumar | weshay|ruck: kopecmartin arxcruz rlandy tempest meeting is conflicting with Paul open forum webcast? Do we want to cancel or keep it? | 12:23 |
| weshay|ruck | zbr, thank you! | 12:23 |
| rlandy | chandankumar: either way - fine by me | 12:23 |
| weshay|ruck | zbr, https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/requirements/+/797620 ? | 12:23 |
| weshay|ruck | is that the fix | 12:23 |
| kopecmartin | chandankumar: i don't have anything specific, I'm fine with cancelling it | 12:25 |
| *** ysandeep is now known as ysandeep|afk | 12:26 | |
| *** amoralej|lunch is now known as amoralej | 12:30 | |
| chandankumar | rlandy: kopecmartin ok then keeping it | 12:31 |
| *** pojadhav|afk is now known as pojadhav | 12:32 | |
| *** jpena|lunch is now known as jpena | 12:33 | |
| rlandy | weshay|ruck: commenting on CIX card related to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1954108 ... | 12:33 |
| rlandy | the logs in the BZ are no longer available | 12:33 |
| rlandy | looks like if we get deploy to pass we're good | 12:34 |
| rlandy | leaving that note | 12:34 |
| zbr | weshay|ruck: note, that is adding our test reqs to upper constraints, it may be an alternative to pip-compile (if it gets approved) | 12:34 |
| zbr | weshay|ruck: were did you copy the bit with notify: yum-clean-metadata from? | 12:39 |
| zbr | nevermind, i found it on google. | 12:42 |
| anbanerj|rover | marios|ruck|call, yes, I can remove the tests from the promotion server criteria and run the promotion for ussuri | 12:44 |
| marios|ruck|call | anbanerj|rover: ? | 12:46 |
| marios|ruck|call | anbanerj|rover: which tests did i miss a conversation here ... me scrolls up | 12:46 |
| *** marios|ruck|call is now known as marios|ruck | 12:47 | |
| anbanerj|rover | marios|ruck|call, I mean I can work with you on the ussuri promotion I thought there are some failing jobs which we should remove from criteria and run promotions | 12:48 |
| marios|ruck | anbanerj|rover: couple of jobs were failing but we got them through with testproject on https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/testproject/+/34256 . but the problem is with our ci-config tooling because even though those jobs are using the right hash, they are not reporting it, instead reporting the current value of tripleo-ci-testing not the one we are overriding with | 12:49 |
| marios|ruck | that needs to be fixed | 12:49 |
| marios|ruck | anbanerj|rover: so we could consider promoting aggregate: 4a47487922712b220c9e80ee0ca16ed9 i.e. waive missing jobs {'periodic-tripleo-ci-centos-8-standalone-on-multinode-ipa-ussuri', 'periodic-tripleo-ci-centos-8-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset035-ussuri'} | 12:49 |
| marios|ruck | (the ones that passed in https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/testproject/+/34256 ) | 12:49 |
| anbanerj|rover | marios|ruck, oh ok. I still need to find out a lot more about how promotions work. /me going for lunch. Will read through the promotion hackmd after that. I have a 1-1 today. If it is ok with you and rlandy I can try the ussuri promotion then | 12:57 |
| rlandy | anbanerj|rover: ok by me | 12:57 |
| marios|ruck | anbanerj|rover: sure np i want to dig some more into how to fixup the dlrn reporting for now | 12:58 |
| anbanerj|rover | marios|ruck, rlandy thanks | 12:58 |
| marios|ruck | anbanerj|rover: we have some recently updated docs in tripleo-docs too you should check | 12:58 |
| marios|ruck | anbanerj|rover: that one https://docs.openstack.org/tripleo-docs/latest/ci/stages-overview.html | 12:58 |
| marios|ruck | a lot there worth reading again if you already have | 12:58 |
| anbanerj|rover | marios|ruck, thanks. I'll check | 12:59 |
| chandankumar | arxcruz, akhat, chandankumar, mkopec, soniya29, weshay, rlandy, ysandeep tempest meeting: https://meet.google.com/zvw-hnds-ncu?authuser=2 and agenda: https://hackmd.io/fIOKlEBHQfeTZjZmrUaEYQ?view | 13:01 |
| *** ysandeep|afk is now known as ysandeep | 13:04 | |
| * ysandeep facing issues with sso | 13:04 | |
| chandankumar | rlandy: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-tempest-skiplist/+/789625 | 13:19 |
| weshay|ruck | ysandeep, your patch merged.. vote on https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ci-config/+/34269 | 13:24 |
| ysandeep | weshay|ruck, yes and its on box already, i just rebased your patch ^^ it was in merge conflict | 13:25 |
| weshay|ruck | k | 13:26 |
| ysandeep | rlandy: when you have time, this one need another vote: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ci-config/+/34269 | 13:45 |
| rlandy | ysandeep: looking | 13:49 |
| rlandy | ysandeep: we're also having a bad time with OVB downstream | 13:49 |
| rlandy | going to look at that more today | 13:50 |
| akahat | marios|ruck, o/ rdo jobs are getting node failure issues. is it known? https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ci-config/+/34273, https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ci-config/+/34196 | 13:50 |
| marios|ruck | akahat: yes https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1931226 we have a ticket with vex about that and cix but no update so far they are working on it | 13:50 |
| marios|ruck | akahat: it is not consistent so try recheck for now | 13:51 |
| rlandy | ysandeep: ok to w+ that? | 13:51 |
| ysandeep | rlandy, yes | 13:51 |
| rlandy | done | 13:51 |
| akahat | marios|ruck, okay. thanks for update !! | 13:51 |
| arxcruz | weshay|ruck: rlandy http://38.102.83.131/quay/master-report.html let me know if it's missing something | 13:57 |
| rlandy | arxcruz++ nice | 13:58 |
| ysandeep | rlandy: Shrestha commented on cix card that new ovn is released, we can remove the workaround, i tested locally.. looks okay: http://pastebin.test.redhat.com/974213 | 14:01 |
| ysandeep | rlandy, I have created reverts: https://code.engineering.redhat.com/gerrit/q/topic:%22revert_ovn_pinning%22+(status:open%20OR%20status:merged) | 14:02 |
| rlandy | ysandeep: great - thanks | 14:02 |
| ysandeep | rlandy: ack for ovb issues in downstream, please let me know if you need a hand | 14:03 |
| ysandeep | weshay|ruck: fyi.. your patch is on box as well | 14:12 |
| *** ysandeep is now known as ysandeep|out | 14:14 | |
| *** marios|ruck is now known as marios|ruck|call | 14:31 | |
| *** marios|ruck|call is now known as marios|ruck | 14:51 | |
| weshay|ruck | marios|ruck, anbanerj|rover you folks chatting? | 14:58 |
| anbanerj|rover | weshay|ruck, not yet | 14:59 |
| marios|ruck | weshay|ruck: about what? | 15:00 |
| weshay|ruck | zbr, anything I can help review / merge re: molecule | 15:00 |
| weshay|ruck | marios|ruck, anbanerj|rover you mentioned you might chat after the cix call.. | 15:00 |
| marios|ruck | weshay|ruck: don't recall... what was the subject/issue | 15:00 |
| weshay|ruck | just trying to catch up and help if I can | 15:00 |
| marios|ruck | weshay|ruck: or rather is there something you need to discuss? | 15:00 |
| marios|ruck | weshay|ruck: sure we can catchup | 15:00 |
| anbanerj|rover | marios|ruck, shall I make the job non voting? | 15:00 |
| marios|ruck | anbanerj|rover: yeah that would be great | 15:01 |
| chandankumar | rlandy: bhagyashris_ waiting for you to join | 15:01 |
| marios|ruck | anbanerj|rover: for https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1933309 you mean | 15:01 |
| marios|ruck | anbanerj|rover: but can you please please update the bug when you do that so we keep the info on there when sbaker checks it out in his morning | 15:01 |
| marios|ruck | anbanerj|rover: thank you ! | 15:01 |
| weshay|ruck | the only thing I don't have clarity on is ussuri promotion atm | 15:01 |
| anbanerj|rover | marios|ruck, yep 1933309. I'll update the bug | 15:02 |
| anbanerj|rover | weshay|ruck, I'll work with rlandy in todays 1-1 for ussuri promotion | 15:02 |
| marios|ruck | weshay|ruck: well, i am trying to do it with https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/testproject/+/34256 assuming https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ci-config/+/34275 works | 15:02 |
| weshay|ruck | ah k.. thank you both.. /me looks | 15:02 |
| marios|ruck | weshay|ruck: otherwise as before, i.e. the jobs ran and passed in testproject/+/34256 but the dlrn reporting was off. i confirmed the containers are also good i.e. TASK | Pull 192.168.24.1:8787/tripleoussuri/centos-binary-mariadb:4a47487922712b220c9e80ee0ca16ed9-updated-20210622161906 image | 15:02 |
| marios|ruck | weshay|ruck: i didn't confirm the repos | 15:03 |
| weshay|ruck | that looks like the right idea to me :) | 15:03 |
| marios|ruck | weshay|ruck: the point is, we could consider promoting that hash 4a47487922712b220c9e80ee0ca16ed9 based on those jobs passing | 15:03 |
| marios|ruck | weshay|ruck: or wait to see if my testproject works then it should report it OK for the promoter to find | 15:03 |
| weshay|ruck | yes.. | 15:04 |
| weshay|ruck | marios|ruck, anbanerj|rover any questions or concernts on the tripleo-ci tasks? | 15:04 |
| marios|ruck | weshay|ruck: so anyway i'm around for the next hour ish if you want to discuss further about that ussuri promote stuff | 15:04 |
| weshay|ruck | marios|ruck, your patches could do the trick.. and we should try to land https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ci-config/+/34275/1/ci-scripts/infra-setup/roles/get_hash/tasks/get_hash.yaml | 15:05 |
| weshay|ruck | if it doesn't we'll take the exit ramp w/ anbanerj|rover later today w/ ronelle for ussuri | 15:06 |
| weshay|ruck | so we remove the time pressure | 15:06 |
| weshay|ruck | anbanerj|rover, ur on the hook for victoria | 15:06 |
| rlandy | chandankumar: periodic-tripleo-ci-rhel-8-bm_envD-3ctlr_1comp-featureset035-rhos-16.2 | 15:09 |
| marios|ruck | weshay|ruck: well ok lets see it took a lot of staring to post those 11 lines so might need tweaking but yeah hopefully it is something simple like that | 15:09 |
| rlandy | chandankumar: https://sf.hosted.upshift.rdu2.redhat.com/zuul/t/tripleo-ci-internal/buildset/40d90d0062d544a688224ba981e4a891 | 15:11 |
| weshay|ruck | ysandeep|out, the latest patches have been automatically pulled into the tool box | 15:12 |
| weshay|ruck | marios|ruck++ | 15:12 |
| weshay|ruck | marios|ruck, anbanerj|rover fyi.. toolbox scripts that clean stacks from vexx appears to be working properly again | 15:13 |
| marios|ruck | weshay|ruck: thanks | 15:15 |
| zbr | weshay|ruck: i am getting closer,... | 15:20 |
| *** ykarel is now known as ykarel|away | 15:20 | |
| weshay|ruck | zbr, k.. thank you | 15:21 |
| anbanerj|rover | Hey rlandy, if you have some time now we can chat about the ussuri promotion | 15:33 |
| rlandy | anbanerj|rover: sure | 15:37 |
| anbanerj|rover | rlandy, thanks, joining the 1-1 | 15:37 |
| rlandy | weshay|ruck: ^^ just fyi | 15:37 |
| rlandy | working on ussuri promotion | 15:37 |
| marios|ruck | anbanerj|rover: weshay|ruck: me close to end of file ping me gchat for anything to look at in the morning as usual ;) | 15:49 |
| *** marios|ruck is now known as marios|out | 15:55 | |
| chandankumar | rlandy: weshay|ruck we made some changes https://sf.hosted.upshift.rdu2.redhat.com/images/redhat8/rhos-16.2/wes-current-tripleo/ | 15:57 |
| chandankumar | qcow2 client is working now | 15:57 |
| weshay|ruck | woot | 15:58 |
| chandankumar | akahat: https://code.engineering.redhat.com/gerrit/c/tripleo-environments/+/249542 | 15:58 |
| *** jpena is now known as jpena|off | 16:00 | |
| rlandy | chandankumar: nice thanks | 16:17 |
| *** frenzy_friday is now known as anbanerj|rover | 16:19 | |
| *** amoralej is now known as amoralej|off | 16:25 | |
| rlandy | chandankumar: rekicked 16.2 jobs that hit node failures: https://code.engineering.redhat.com/gerrit/c/testproject/+/189440 | 16:28 |
| *** sshnaidm is now known as sshnaidm|afk | 16:35 | |
| weshay|ruck | arxcruz, woot.. tempest.keystone.api in the house :) | 16:37 |
| weshay|ruck | zbr++ well done.. ran it locally :) | 16:39 |
| weshay|ruck | zbr, did molecule version need a bump for prepare? | 16:40 |
| arxcruz | weshay|ruck: yup | 16:42 |
| arxcruz | weshay|ruck: and here's your report http://38.102.83.131/quay/master-report.html and http://38.102.83.131/quay/tag/wallaby-report.html | 16:42 |
| arxcruz | check if you liked or should i change something | 16:42 |
| weshay|ruck | AH... look at that | 16:43 |
| weshay|ruck | I love it | 16:43 |
| weshay|ruck | arxcruz, that looks great.. so how do I know if I need to respond to openstack-aodh-evaluator? | 16:45 |
| weshay|ruck | need reviews on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ci/+/797528 | 16:46 |
| arxcruz | manually try to copy or check what's wrong with that one | 16:46 |
| arxcruz | weshay|ruck: that html will always be the latest run, it will not keep old ones | 16:46 |
| weshay|ruck | k | 16:46 |
| arxcruz | the other txt log file will be available though | 16:46 |
| weshay|ruck | you add a README.html w/ your tips/tricks | 16:46 |
| weshay|ruck | context | 16:46 |
| arxcruz | ok | 16:47 |
| weshay|ruck | thank you!! you are knocking these down | 16:47 |
| zbr | weshay|ruck: TBH, i am not sure if molecule needed a bump for our fix, but i did not want to have to deal with an unsupported version | 16:48 |
| weshay|ruck | ++ | 16:48 |
| zbr | probably not, the changed_when bit was required, otherwise idempotence would have failed (was disabled before) | 16:49 |
| zbr | we did not run prepare and idempotence before this change. | 16:49 |
| rlandy | anbanerj|rover: https://trunk.rdoproject.org/centos8-ussuri/current-tripleo/delorean.repo.md5 | 17:01 |
| rlandy | ^^ that what you expected? | 17:01 |
| rlandy | dlrn_hash_tag: 4a47487922712b220c9e80ee0ca16ed9 | 17:02 |
| rlandy | in job | 17:02 |
| rlandy | 4b498feadc27f8999f24a1acf91f3b7f | 17:02 |
| rlandy | weshay|ruck: anbanerj|rover: ^^? | 17:02 |
| rlandy | refresh ok | 17:03 |
| rlandy | 4a47487922712b220c9e80ee0ca16ed9 | 17:03 |
| rlandy | sorry - nvm | 17:03 |
| anbanerj|rover | rlandy, Yep! 4a47487922712b220c9e80ee0ca16ed9 | 17:31 |
| * anbanerj|rover leaving for the day | 17:33 | |
| weshay|ruck | rlandy, https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ci-config/+/34115 | 17:46 |
| weshay|ruck | rlandy, https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ci/+/797528 | 18:00 |
| rlandy | weshay|ruck: and then lo and behold ... ovb returns | 18:32 |
| rlandy | periodic-tripleo-ci-rhel-8-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001-internal-rhos-16.2success | 18:32 |
| rlandy | periodic-tripleo-ci-rhel-8-ovb-1ctlr_2comp-featureset020-internal-rhos-16.2 | 18:32 |
| rlandy | chandankumar: ^^ well we promised you promotable hash | 18:33 |
| rlandy | waiting on two jobs to rerun | 18:33 |
| weshay|ruck | ah nice | 18:36 |
| rlandy | weshay|ruck: hmmm ... https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart/+/797541 didn;t work | 18:47 |
| weshay|ruck | ya.. I commented | 18:48 |
| weshay|ruck | rlandy, we could exclude ansible from that repo | 18:48 |
| rlandy | priority=20 is there | 18:48 |
| weshay|ruck | aye | 18:48 |
| rlandy | weshay|ruck: ack | 18:48 |
| rlandy | better way to go | 18:49 |
| rlandy | weshay|ruck: updating that patch | 18:49 |
| weshay|ruck | dviroel, ^ tooling.. in play eventually | 18:49 |
| dviroel | weshay|ruck: +1, soon | 18:51 |
| rlandy | chandankumar: weshay|ruck: akahat: http://osp-trunk.hosted.upshift.rdu2.redhat.com/api-rhel8-osp16-2/api/civotes_agg_detail.html?ref_hash=93bf835ed8672dcec32e052836842dd7 | 19:33 |
| rlandy | ^^ good hash to promote | 19:33 |
| rlandy | all passed except BM | 19:33 |
| rlandy | even two ovb jobs | 19:34 |
| rlandy | checking BM box | 19:34 |
| rlandy | may be an issue there | 19:34 |
| weshay|ruck | hrm | 19:34 |
| * weshay|ruck looks | 19:35 | |
| weshay|ruck | rlandy, ya.. ran for 10 hours in gather facts | 19:36 |
| weshay|ruck | 2021-06-23 09:54:48.803026 | primary | TASK [Gathering Facts] ********************************************************* | 19:36 |
| weshay|ruck | 2021-06-23 09:54:48.803033 | primary | Wednesday 23 June 2021 09:54:48 -0400 (0:00:00.080) 0:00:00.177 ******** | 19:36 |
| weshay|ruck | 2021-06-23 19:16:59.998426 | RUN END RESULT_TIMED_OUT: [untrusted : opendev.org/openstack/tripleo-ci/playbooks/tripleo-ci/run-v3.yaml@master] | 19:36 |
| weshay|ruck | 2021-06-23 19:16:59.998787 | POST-RUN START: [trusted : code.engineering.redhat.com/openstack/tripleo-ci-internal-config/playbooks/dlrn/post-dlrn.yaml@master] | 19:36 |
| weshay|ruck | odd | 19:36 |
| weshay|ruck | rlandy, ack to promote | 19:36 |
| weshay|ruck | rlandy, can you set the ussuri criteria back? | 19:36 |
| rlandy | weshay|ruck: yeah = something up there | 19:37 |
| rlandy | weshay|ruck: checking - I didn't anbanerj|rover may have | 19:37 |
| weshay|ruck | thanks | 19:38 |
| rlandy | weshay|ruck: k - criteria are back | 19:39 |
| rlandy | and hash count | 19:39 |
| weshay|ruck | :) | 19:39 |
| rlandy | weshay|ruck: can you try enqueue-ref 17? when I do it never starts properly | 19:40 |
| rlandy | just want to see if it's juts me | 19:40 |
| rlandy | just | 19:40 |
| weshay|ruck | rlandy, sure | 19:41 |
| weshay|ruck | sec | 19:41 |
| rlandy | thanks | 19:41 |
| weshay|ruck | triggered.. not started | 19:43 |
| weshay|ruck | rlandy, it started.. then died | 19:54 |
| rlandy | weshay|ruck: same with me | 19:55 |
| rlandy | the minute you start it, you need to say kaddish for the line | 19:56 |
| rlandy | never gets going | 19:56 |
| rlandy | will wait for the next kick | 19:56 |
| weshay|ruck | rlandy, I'll email mathieu | 19:56 |
| rlandy | k - thanks | 19:57 |
| *** dviroel is now known as dviroel|out | 21:13 | |
| anbanerj|rover | rlandy, weshay|ruck omg! I forgot to reset the criteria! | 21:33 |
| rlandy | anbanerj|rover: np - I did it | 21:33 |
| anbanerj|rover | rlandy, thanks | 21:34 |
| *** rlandy is now known as rlandy|bbl | 22:15 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.2 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!