*** ykarel|away is now known as ykarel | 04:27 | |
*** bhagyashris_ is now known as bhagyashris|ruck | 05:25 | |
*** ysandeep|away is now known as ysandeep | 05:27 | |
*** pojadhav- is now known as pojadhav | 05:50 | |
*** amoralej|off is now known as amoralej | 06:51 | |
ysandeep | chkumar|rover, i noticed your comment on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart/+/800330 that deployment pulled previous-current-tripleo, fyi.. https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1934097 we faced something similar here some time back. | 07:18 |
---|---|---|
chkumar|rover | ysandeep: yes, it is perfectly the same issue. | 07:26 |
chkumar|rover | it failed at two patches on inap cloud | 07:26 |
chkumar|rover | ysandeep: thanks for passing the link | 07:27 |
marios | pojadhav: please check https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ci/+/797865/12#message-818175afaf37ff381828cd546cb501ff24d61e45 | 07:31 |
*** ysandeep is now known as ysandeep|lunch | 07:34 | |
chkumar|rover | ykarel: Hello | 07:41 |
chkumar|rover | ykarel: Do you remember the bug where triple-repos failed due to missing python3-cliff? | 07:41 |
ykarel | chkumar|rover, /me not sure if bug was reported | 07:46 |
chkumar|rover | ykarel: is there a way to get python3-cliff in centos base repos? | 07:47 |
ykarel | but i doubt it was in CI | 07:47 |
ykarel | chkumar|rover, can only come to centos via rhel | 07:47 |
chkumar|rover | yes correct | 07:48 |
ykarel | and to already released OS's it's very rare new packages are added | 07:48 |
pojadhav | marios, ack | 08:10 |
pojadhav | marios, https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ci/+/797865/14#message-bd3f4bba63d1b7ea749d1fc102f6fff0eefe73b7 | 08:22 |
pojadhav | marios, zuul error "Job tripleo-ci-centos-8-undercloud-upgrade-master not defined" | 08:24 |
marios | pojadhav: yes check the job name | 08:27 |
pojadhav | marios, sorry..i have added '-master' for that undercloud-upgrade job name, now referring job name you have keep in https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ci/+/793393/5/zuul.d/upgrades-jobs-templates.yaml#417 | 08:27 |
marios | pojadhav: ack | 08:28 |
*** ykarel is now known as ykarel|lunch | 08:47 | |
pojadhav | ysandeep|lunch, marios, weshay|ruck, chkumar|rover : please approve https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-jobs/+/34491 | 08:53 |
* pojadhav will be out rest of the day. | 08:54 | |
*** ysandeep|lunch is now known as ysandeep | 08:54 | |
marios | pojadhav: k will check but what is the context there are we no longer using it | 08:56 |
ysandeep | pojadhav, lgtm, but I only have +1 there | 08:56 |
ysandeep | marios: commented | 08:57 |
ysandeep | https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-jobs/+/34437 - job with new name was added here | 08:58 |
marios | thanks ysandeep | 08:58 |
bhagyashris|ruck | https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1935948 | 08:58 |
bhagyashris|ruck | ysandeep, chkumar|rover ^ | 08:58 |
ysandeep | bhagyashris|ruck: checking | 08:59 |
ysandeep | bhagyashris|ruck, oops, i see the issue - changed_when: true got indented under shell... i never want to change anything for < ussuri | 09:04 |
ysandeep | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/+/800215/2/roles/overcloud-prep-images/tasks/overcloud-prep-images.yml#112 | 09:04 |
ysandeep | bhagyashris|ruck, posting fix.. i think queens/stein will be impact as well | 09:05 |
bhagyashris|ruck | ysandeep, ack | 09:06 |
bhagyashris|ruck | thanks | 09:07 |
bhagyashris|ruck | chkumar|rover, ^ | 09:07 |
ysandeep | bhagyashris|ruck, patch is already up to use.. operators for train as well https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/+/800592 , once testproject reports, I will update if to fix legacy script as well | 09:08 |
bhagyashris|ruck | ysandeep, ack | 09:09 |
ysandeep | fyi.. testing here.. https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/testproject/+/28537 - already in deploy steps.. | 09:10 |
ysandeep | I am assigning bug to myself.. | 09:10 |
bhagyashris|ruck | ysandeep, ok but sandeep anyways the the testproject will encounter with same issue | 09:12 |
bhagyashris|ruck | so IMO we can change instead of waiting the the result | 09:12 |
ysandeep | bhagyashris|ruck, no, because it will not use legacy script | 09:12 |
ysandeep | but agree.. we can update in parallel and rerun the testproject to save time. | 09:13 |
bhagyashris|ruck | yes it will not use but in the task we have syntax issue | 09:13 |
bhagyashris|ruck | so it will fail there | 09:14 |
bhagyashris|ruck | ysandeep, ack just instead of waiting lets correct the syntax first and then test this was my opinion | 09:14 |
chkumar|rover | ysandeep: bhagyashris|ruck thanks! | 09:19 |
ysandeep | bhagyashris|ruck, chkumar|rover updated https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/+/800592 | 09:23 |
bhagyashris|ruck | ysandeep, thanks | 09:23 |
*** dmellado_ is now known as dmellado | 09:25 | |
* ysandeep wondering if we can somehow capture these kind of issue with linters.. | 09:34 | |
*** ykarel|lunch is now known as ykarel | 10:11 | |
* frenzy_friday lunch | 10:39 | |
*** dviroel|out is now known as dviroel | 11:20 | |
rlandy | marios: hey ... when you have a moment, I was looking at pojadhav's upgrade jobs | 11:40 |
rlandy | I'm missing which branch should be upgrading to which | 11:40 |
rlandy | would like to clarify that so I can finish those reviews | 11:41 |
marios | o/ rlandy i replied on the review with some pointers, lets discuss in community call (and after if needed)? | 11:45 |
dviroel | rlandy: i'm following rhos-ops :) | 12:08 |
rlandy | dviroel: http://images.rdoproject.org/centos_compose/centos8/ - you're ready to go | 12:09 |
dviroel | thanks | 12:09 |
weshay|ruck | marios, I think swfit may have been removed from wallaby, xena undercloud https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1935961 re: ephemeral heat | 12:09 |
marios | weshay|ruck: yes or at least it should be seems something is missing | 12:09 |
weshay|ruck | ah.. ya.. rabi just commented | 12:09 |
zbr | dviroel: can you please checkout https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-repos/+/800462 locally and run `tox -e sanity`? | 12:15 |
dviroel | zbr: yes, will do | 12:15 |
zbr | in current form it should pass, but that is breaking all the other jobs | 12:16 |
zbr | that get_hash functionality was implemented as some kind of makeshift thing that combines a python module, cli and and ansible module. we will have some fun refactoring it to fix with module writing guidelines. | 12:19 |
*** amoralej is now known as amoralej|lunch | 12:19 | |
dviroel | zbr: "sanity: commands succeeded" | 12:20 |
zbr | as expected, check the output to get an idea about what kind of validations it performs, the list is quite long. | 12:21 |
zbr | i had to do lots of small changes to make it pass, minor but multiple. | 12:22 |
zbr | i wonder if we should have a meet with you and someone else, maybe marios where I explain how ansible modules work and what challenges we have. | 12:23 |
zbr | i really need to explain module file, limitations around imports, how/where to put shared code (module_utils), import paths. | 12:23 |
dviroel | zbr: yes, i think we should :) | 12:24 |
dviroel | zbr: i saw this warning here: ".ansible/collections/ansible_collections/tripleo/tripleo_repos' does not have a galaxy.yml or a MANIFEST.json file" in the output | 12:24 |
marios | zbr: sure do you want to schedule something/send invite/ | 12:25 |
zbr | i will wait for somone else to raise a hand, i want an audience of two. | 12:25 |
zbr | i can do at any time, even in 5min from now. is only about explaining changes from that review, so we can think what we need to do later. | 12:26 |
marios | zbr: i prefer a scheduled call please but i am just responding to your ping so... not completely following this discussion or context right now | 12:26 |
zbr | lets see what subjects we have on community, maybe we can squeeze that topic, i think it does interest entire tripleo in the end anyway. | 12:27 |
marios | o/ tripleo-ci needs reviews please add to your list https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/+/793331 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-repos/+/795333 (both needed for https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart/+/791486) | 12:28 |
weshay|ruck | ysandeep, chkumar|rover one of you were looking into http://dashboard-ci.tripleo.org/d/M1DYSidGz/component-pipeline?viewPanel=478&orgId=1 | 12:28 |
weshay|ruck | I think | 12:28 |
weshay|ruck | any insights, bugs etc? | 12:28 |
chkumar|rover | weshay|ruck: nope, looking now | 12:29 |
bhagyashris|ruck | i think ysandeep was triggered network component few days back not sure about exact reason searching testproject patch | 12:34 |
* zbr wondering why he is alone in community meeting? | 12:35 | |
marios | zbr: in one hour | 12:38 |
marios | zbr: well, like 52 mins | 12:38 |
zbr | hmm, some kind of summer time glitch, im my callendar started 8min ago, and previous weeks it was ok... | 12:39 |
zbr | there is also one "TripleO Meeting" starting in 20mins, 1h long, so they would overlap. | 12:40 |
marios | zbr: no... are you looking at the right day? | 12:41 |
marios | zbr: tripleo meeting is next week | 12:41 |
zbr | https://sbarnea.com/ss/Screen-Shot-2021-07-13-13-41-57.01.png | 12:42 |
zbr | \o/ | 12:42 |
marios | zbr: i don't have that in mine... i deleted that event a while ago was created by wes and replaced it with one that is every two weeks i.e. next week | 12:43 |
marios | zbr: don't know whats up with your calendar :D | 12:43 |
chkumar|rover | weshay|ruck: I am not sure it is linked with HttpException: 503: Server Error for url: http://192.168.24.3:9696/v2.0/networks?tenant_id=756b1723b8834063832e4e29f6fb311f, 503 Service Unavailable: No server is available to handle this request. | 12:44 |
chkumar|rover | weshay|ruck: https://logserver.rdoproject.org/openstack-component-network/opendev.org/openstack/tripleo-ci/master/periodic-tripleo-ci-centos-8-scenario007-standalone-network-master/85b1d2f/logs/undercloud/var/log/containers/neutron/server.log.txt.gz | 12:44 |
chkumar|rover | weshay|ruck: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'os_resource_classes' | 12:44 |
chkumar|rover | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/799676 | 12:44 |
zbr | dviroel: if you can join jsc-ukef-iiy it would be great (others welcome too): subject layout of ansible modules | 12:46 |
dviroel | zbr, yes, one sec | 12:47 |
weshay|ruck | chkumar|rover, so.. new package? | 12:50 |
ysandeep | bhagyashris|ruck, that was infra issue passed in second run | 12:50 |
weshay|ruck | chkumar|rover, https://trunk.rdoproject.org/centos8-master/component/clients/3d/d3/3dd3506d092d0360b16e131592974f7214b2e650_2df9ce4c/rpmbuild.log | 12:50 |
chkumar|rover | ok so http://mirror.regionone.vexxhost-nodepool-tripleo.rdoproject.org:8080/rdo/centos8/component/network/bf/7a/bf7a6061a061bfa08eb1ca96c0ac1bc2d5e580b9_534c9b30/ is used in deployment, | 12:50 |
weshay|ruck | chkumar|rover, so we need to promote clients | 12:51 |
chkumar|rover | package is already there | 12:51 |
weshay|ruck | and promote master | 12:51 |
ysandeep | weshay|ruck, chkumar|rover need reviews please when you have time: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ci-config/+/34453 , adding back ovb jobs in component criteria.. Wes earlier removed them when hostname package was causing issues.. | 12:51 |
chkumar|rover | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/799676 is not yet in the component promotion line | 12:51 |
chkumar|rover | let me open a bug | 12:52 |
weshay|ruck | chkumar|rover, https://trunk.rdoproject.org/centos8-master/component/clients/97/c5/97c578bcadf24eec970f4b711aaf58d5c9e099c8_184f2581/ | 12:52 |
weshay|ruck | I only see src and doc | 12:52 |
weshay|ruck | nvrmind https://trunk.rdoproject.org/centos8-master/component/clients/97/c5/97c578bcadf24eec970f4b711aaf58d5c9e099c8_184f2581/python3-os-resource-classes-1.0.0-0.20201118094531.3dd3506.el8.noarch.rpm | 12:53 |
chkumar|rover | python3-os-resource-classes-1.0.0-0.20201118094531.3dd3506.el8.noarch.rpm | 12:53 |
weshay|ruck | it's old 2020-11-18 09:4617K | 12:53 |
weshay|ruck | https://github.com/openstack/os-resource-classes/commits/master | 12:53 |
weshay|ruck | maybe it's pinned | 12:53 |
chkumar|rover | let me propose a patch | 12:53 |
weshay|ruck | chkumar|rover++ | 12:54 |
chkumar|rover | new deps is added to neutron https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/799676/4/requirements.txt | 12:54 |
chkumar|rover | we need to update spec file | 12:54 |
weshay|ruck | k.. thanks | 12:54 |
weshay|ruck | ++ component pipeline.. this would have killed integration | 12:54 |
weshay|ruck | chkumar|rover, may be the same thing here: http://dashboard-ci.tripleo.org/d/mOvYIiOMk/component-pipeline-train?viewPanel=478&orgId=1 | 12:56 |
akahat | Review request: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/+/800340 | 12:57 |
akahat | Review request: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ci-config/+/33815 | 12:57 |
akahat | Review request: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ci-config/+/34493 | 12:57 |
rlandy | openstack subnet set is failing with Invalid input for dns_nameservers. Reason: Duplicate nameserver on baremetal ... https://sf.hosted.upshift.rdu2.redhat.com/logs/openstack-component-tripleo/opendev.org/openstack/tripleo-ci/master/periodic-tripleo-ci-rhel-8-bm_envC-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001-tripleo-rhos-16.2/0da9374/logs/undercloud/home/zuul/overcloud_prep_network.log | 13:00 |
rlandy | ysandeep: sshnaidm: ^^ you guys know anything off hand about that? | 13:01 |
chkumar|rover | weshay|ruck: ykarel https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/openstack/neutron-distgit/+/34515 | 13:01 |
rlandy | 16.2 and 17 | 13:01 |
ysandeep | rlandy, looking | 13:02 |
rlandy | ysandeep: thanks - just checking before I debug more | 13:03 |
ykarel | chkumar|rover, looking | 13:05 |
ykarel | ahh no unit test bypassed it to component | 13:05 |
ysandeep | rlandy, last good logs were using neutron commands instead - https://sf.hosted.upshift.rdu2.redhat.com/logs/openstack-component-tripleo/opendev.org/openstack/tripleo-ci/master/periodic-tripleo-ci-rhel-8-bm_envC-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001-tripleo-rhos-16.2/242ccc9/logs/undercloud/home/zuul/overcloud_prep_network.log | 13:06 |
ysandeep | neutron subnet-update a0e03026-3ed4-4707-b5aa-fa5659b70c65 --dns-nameserver 10.5.30.160 | 13:06 |
ysandeep | vs current openstack subnet set 07a0fe5d-c8ee-41ff-87f6-e56b2ccda232 --dns-nameserver 10.5.30.160 | 13:06 |
chkumar|rover | ykarel: weshay|ruck https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1935974 | 13:07 |
chkumar|rover | slawq is on pto | 13:07 |
ysandeep | rlandy, overcloud-prep-network.sh changed.. let me trace patch - where we changed this | 13:07 |
rlandy | ysandeep: got it https://github.com/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/commit/96dc904147bbf357d59b957e09d70b4b33ee4d21 | 13:08 |
marios | zbr: shall we merge that? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart/+/799475/ | 13:09 |
marios | please needs reviews there https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart/+/799475/ | 13:09 |
marios | tripleo ci o/ ^^^^ | 13:09 |
marios | thank you | 13:09 |
marios | !! | 13:09 |
opendevmeet | marios: Error: "!" is not a valid command. | 13:09 |
sshnaidm | rlandy, nope | 13:09 |
rlandy | sshnaidm: np - got the change | 13:09 |
ysandeep | rlandy: yeah, it started with that | 13:10 |
sshnaidm | and why there is no "--no-dns-nameserver" part of command | 13:11 |
*** amoralej|lunch is now known as amoralej | 13:13 | |
sshnaidm | seems like overcloud_dns_servers is empty.. | 13:14 |
rlandy | sshnaidm: you working on this? otherwise will ping rabi with update | 13:20 |
sshnaidm | rlandy, nope, just looked briefly | 13:21 |
rlandy | k | 13:21 |
bhagyashris|ruck | arxcruz, zbr, sshnaidm, rlandy, marios, ysandeep, bhagyashris, svyas, soniya29, pojadhav, akahat, weshay|ruck , chkumar|rover , frenzy_friday, dviroel | 13:21 |
bhagyashris|ruck | Tripleo CI community call in 9 mins | 13:21 |
bhagyashris|ruck | feel free to add agenda at line number 31 https://hackmd.io/MMg4WDbYSqOQUhU2Kj8zNg?both#2021-07-13-Community-call | 13:22 |
bhagyashris|ruck | https://meet.google.com/bqx-xwht-wky?authuser=0 | 13:22 |
ysandeep | weshay|ruck, please add these in your review list: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ci-config/+/34453 and https://code.engineering.redhat.com/gerrit/c/tripleo-environments/+/252228 | 13:27 |
zbr | marios: chkumar|rover: do you know any reason why we would not want to bundle the newer get-hash and yum-config code inside the tripleo_repos python package? Do we have reasons to keep them as separated packages? | 13:29 |
zbr | python packages can have any number of submodules inside. | 13:29 |
ysandeep | rlandy, looks like envd is in bad shape too: https://sf.hosted.upshift.rdu2.redhat.com/zuul/t/tripleo-ci-internal/builds?job_name=periodic-tripleo-ci-rhel-8-bm_envD-3ctlr_1comp-featureset035-rhos-16.2 | 13:29 |
marios | zbr: community call now | 13:29 |
zbr | oops, right wrong timing. | 13:29 |
marios | zbr: but yeah we have discussed that as one work item i.e. unify the setup.py from get-hash into the tripleo-repos one | 13:29 |
zbr | okey, subject sorted. | 13:30 |
ysandeep | rlandy, i can't ssh it from local system | 13:30 |
bhagyashris|ruck | chkumar|rover, akahat rlandy pojadhav soniya29 | 13:30 |
rlandy | ysandeep: yep - I know | 13:30 |
bhagyashris|ruck | ^ | 13:30 |
rlandy | next on my list to fix | 13:30 |
bhagyashris|ruck | ysandeep, ^ | 13:30 |
bhagyashris|ruck | meeting time | 13:30 |
soniya29 | bhagyashris|ruck, I have doctor's appointment, so I wont be available | 13:32 |
chkumar|rover | zbr: marios python setup.py sdist generates a single tarball, on packaging side, we can create two package or a single package | 13:35 |
chkumar|rover | it depends upon us how we want to maintain it | 13:35 |
chkumar|rover | one meta package tripleo-repos and sub package for tripleo hash and yum repos | 13:36 |
chkumar|rover | zbr: regarding python packaging side, I am ok with it | 13:37 |
chkumar|rover | what makes end user life easier | 13:37 |
marios | weshay|ruck: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ci/+/793393 | 13:58 |
marios | rlandy: ^^^ | 14:00 |
rlandy | done | 14:01 |
weshay|ruck | ysandeep, to sshnaidm do we want to update https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/+/800215/2/roles/overcloud-prep-images/tasks/overcloud-prep-images.yml | 14:10 |
weshay|ruck | to include train? | 14:10 |
ysandeep | weshay|ruck, done in https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/+/800592 | 14:11 |
weshay|ruck | ysandeep, ah thanks | 14:11 |
ysandeep | weshay|ruck, sshnaidm fyi.. image upload is also ready for reviews https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/+/800623 | 14:12 |
ysandeep | will ping once upstream zuul reports, rdo results are positive | 14:12 |
ysandeep | https://logserver.rdoproject.org/23/800623/1/openstack-check/tripleo-ci-centos-8-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001/4f4c011/logs/undercloud/home/zuul/tripleo_overcloud_image_upload.sh.txt.gz - created using operator | 14:14 |
sshnaidm | ysandeep, ack | 14:16 |
sshnaidm | ysandeep, can you please add ovb jobs to run on these operators changes in operators repo? | 14:17 |
ysandeep | sshnaidm: yes we have it in plan: https://projects.engineering.redhat.com/browse/TRIPLEOCI-566 , I can post that tomorrow | 14:17 |
sshnaidm | ysandeep, great, thanks | 14:18 |
ysandeep | sshnaidm, fs001/master is enough? | 14:18 |
sshnaidm | ysandeep, yeah | 14:18 |
ysandeep | thanks! | 14:18 |
weshay|ruck | chkumar|rover, bhagyashris|ruck several promotions :) good stuff... train is now 7 days old.. let's focus there | 14:20 |
ysandeep | Review requests: please add these in your review list: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ci-config/+/34453 and https://code.engineering.redhat.com/gerrit/c/tripleo-environments/+/252228 | 14:20 |
weshay|ruck | chkumar|rover, bhagyashris|ruck I take it back.. train should promote http://pastebin.test.redhat.com/979061 | 14:21 |
chkumar|rover | good good | 14:22 |
weshay|ruck | chkumar|rover, bhagyashris|ruck ha.. train is promoting http://promoter.rdoproject.org/promoter_logs/centos8_train.log | 14:22 |
weshay|ruck | and look at DEM LOGS :) | 14:22 |
weshay|ruck | akahat++ | 14:22 |
*** ysandeep is now known as ysandeep|away | 14:23 | |
*** ykarel is now known as ykarel|away | 14:24 | |
weshay|ruck | chkumar|rover, bhagyashris|ruck we'll need some extra eyes on this as ysandeep|away starts to exit for pto http://pastebin.test.redhat.com/979066 | 14:25 |
bhagyashris|ruck | weshay|ruck, yup | 14:25 |
weshay|ruck | thanks | 14:26 |
chkumar|rover | weshay|ruck: sure | 14:26 |
marios | o/ tripleo-ci needs reviews please add to your list https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/+/793331 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-repos/+/795333 (both needed for https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart/+/791486) | 14:27 |
* bhagyashris|ruck stepping out | 14:29 | |
rlandy | chkumar|rover: bhagyashris|ruck: weshay|ruck: I am working on getting both downstream lines promoted today - will update the program doc when they are done | 14:43 |
rlandy | components should all be with in time range for promotion except tripleo on 16.2 | 14:43 |
rlandy | rerunning baremetal with fix from rabi for that | 14:44 |
* dviroel lunch | 14:59 | |
rlandy | awk: fatal: cannot open file `changed_when:' for reading (No such file or directory) | 15:18 |
rlandy | ysandeep|away: ^^ failure on introspection | 15:18 |
* rlandy looks into it | 15:19 | |
ysandeep|away | rlandy, could you please add depends-on: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/+/800592 | 15:35 |
ysandeep|away | ^^ will fix 16.2 and train | 15:35 |
rlandy | ysandeep|away: ack | 15:35 |
ysandeep|away | rlandy: my bad i overindented a block and broke 16.2/train in my operator work : https://launchpad.net/bugs/1935948 | 15:36 |
rlandy | no worrie s- will retest | 15:36 |
ysandeep|away | rlandy: when you have time very small review https://code.engineering.redhat.com/gerrit/c/tripleo-environments/+/252228 , i don't want to self merge | 15:38 |
rlandy | ysandeep|away: merging - although that could be in criteria | 15:40 |
rlandy | will fix that later | 15:40 |
ysandeep|away | rlandy++ thanks! | 15:40 |
ysandeep|away | weshay|ruck, I would like to borrow your eyes for https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ci-config/+/34453 , this is long pending when we removed ovb from criteria due to hostname pkg | 15:41 |
* ysandeep|away leaving for the day, see you tomorrow o/ | 15:45 | |
weshay|ruck | akahat, the promoter is still nuking logs | 15:47 |
weshay|ruck | c8-train I saw was promoting.. | 15:47 |
weshay|ruck | http://promoter.rdoproject.org/promoter_logs/?C=M;O=D | 15:48 |
weshay|ruck | and those logs are gone | 15:48 |
weshay|ruck | train promoted though c8 http://dashboard-ci.tripleo.org/d/HkOLImOMk/upstream-and-rdo-promotions?orgId=1 | 15:48 |
chkumar|rover | rlandy: sure, thanks :-) | 15:49 |
weshay|ruck | arxcruz, https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ci-config/+/34442 | 15:52 |
akahat | weshay|ruck, no it's not. http://promoter.rdoproject.org/promoter_logs/centos8_train_2021-07-13T14:59.log | 16:00 |
* dviroel back | 16:01 | |
*** marios is now known as marios|out | 16:02 | |
weshay|ruck | akahat, ah.. cool | 16:03 |
weshay|ruck | rlandy, fyi new logs http://promoter.rdoproject.org/promoter_logs/centos8_train_2021-07-13T14:59.log | 16:03 |
weshay|ruck | akahat++ | 16:03 |
akahat | weshay|ruck, not sure we disabled logrotate on that server. | 16:03 |
akahat | okay deleted logrotate file. Now we will see good logging. | 16:05 |
weshay|ruck | akahat, thanks | 16:13 |
arxcruz | weshay|ruck: odd, it worked on my local machine :/ | 16:15 |
arxcruz | weshay|ruck: i'm checking | 16:15 |
arxcruz | weshay|ruck: can you check again? i update the patch, it's working here | 16:18 |
arxcruz | http://paste.openstack.org/show/807438/ | 16:18 |
weshay|ruck | k | 16:22 |
*** amoralej is now known as amoralej|off | 16:30 | |
rlandy | nice | 16:42 |
weshay|ruck | arxcruz, you still around.. latest patch is not good but I have it working | 17:16 |
* weshay|ruck can run it by you | 17:16 | |
arxcruz | weshay|ruck: yes, still around, what's wrong with the patch | 17:26 |
weshay|ruck | doesnt build | 17:26 |
weshay|ruck | chat? | 17:26 |
weshay|ruck | arxcruz, https://meet.google.com/ovj-zwex-ygh | 17:27 |
-opendevstatus- NOTICE: Depends-On using https://review.opendev.org URLs are currently not working. This was due to a config change in Zuul that we are reverting and will be restarting Zuul to pick up. | 17:40 | |
*** zbr is now known as Guest681 | 17:50 | |
weshay|ruck | rlandy, fyi https://review.rdoproject.org/r/q/topic:%22TripleO-EOL-Branches%22+(status:open%20OR%20status:merged) | 17:52 |
rlandy | weshay|ruck: +2 | 17:53 |
rlandy | there may be one more change | 17:54 |
* rlandy looks after meeting | 17:54 | |
dviroel | weshay|ruck: hey, i'm looking at this task here https://projects.engineering.redhat.com/browse/TRIPLEOCI-568 | 17:58 |
dviroel | seems that we can easily manage this files/links only with ansible, isntead of python or scripts | 17:59 |
dviroel | do we agree on using the python module for that too? | 18:00 |
weshay|ruck | ssamal_, you have your public key in github? | 18:04 |
weshay|ruck | ssamal_, e.g. https://github.com/weshayutin.keys | 18:04 |
weshay|ruck | rlandy, ^ | 18:05 |
weshay|ruck | rlandy, I think we should rerun 16.2 line after https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/+/800592 merges | 18:10 |
rlandy | weshay|ruck: ack - I am rerunning OVB and baremetal with depends on that patch | 18:39 |
rlandy | weshay|ruck: I am going to promote 17 ... http://osp-trunk.hosted.upshift.rdu2.redhat.com/api-rhel8-osp17/api/civotes_agg_detail.html?ref_hash=c118d19aabc19cd8bb760b811234c988 | 18:48 |
rlandy | OVB 35 is still failing with tests we took out of skiplist | 18:48 |
rlandy | will put those back for internal | 18:48 |
rlandy | baremetal is rerunning now | 18:48 |
rlandy | on tempest | 18:48 |
rlandy | with sandeep's patch | 18:48 |
rlandy | current-tripleo/2021-07-06 22:33 | 18:49 |
rlandy | so it's due for promotion | 18:49 |
rlandy | going to try wait for BM to report | 18:50 |
rlandy | but it may get killed by next run | 18:50 |
rlandy | https://sf.hosted.upshift.rdu2.redhat.com/zuul/t/tripleo-ci-internal/stream/54e94ed5001b4fc093713d14dd406a5d?logfile=console.log | 18:51 |
rlandy | ^^ 16.2 with depends-on rabi's patch and sandeep's patch | 18:51 |
rlandy | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/+/800662 | 18:51 |
rlandy | weshay|ruck: ^^ could use another vote here pls | 18:52 |
rlandy | and w+ | 18:52 |
rlandy | weshay|ruck: ysandeep|away: pls vote here ... https://code.engineering.redhat.com/gerrit/c/openstack/tripleo-ci-internal-jobs/+/246489 | 18:58 |
rlandy | lon requested for 17 | 18:58 |
rlandy | change in container names | 18:58 |
weshay|ruck | rlandy, is there a bug on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/+/800662 ? don't need to change the review | 19:46 |
weshay|ruck | just wondering | 19:46 |
* rlandy looks | 19:51 | |
rlandy | weshay|ruck: there was never a bug logged | 19:51 |
rlandy | the df knew about this | 19:51 |
rlandy | comments were in the original change | 19:52 |
weshay|ruck | k | 19:54 |
weshay|ruck | dviroel, sorry didn't see your ping | 20:09 |
dviroel | weshay|ruck: np, doing some local tests here | 20:10 |
weshay|ruck | dviroel, k | 20:10 |
* weshay|ruck adding comments to the story | 20:10 | |
dviroel | weshay|ruck: we probably cant run anything on images.rdoproject right? we can only sent files? | 20:11 |
dviroel | weshay|ruck: i mean, we can't run ansible there | 20:11 |
weshay|ruck | dviroel, we can do both.. but let me check what we're doing now in production | 20:13 |
rlandy | weshay|ruck: wrt 16.2 bm and two OVB tests are in tempest now - will promote if they pass. fs020 already passed | 20:14 |
weshay|ruck | dviroel, https://github.com/rdo-infra/review.rdoproject.org-config/blob/master/playbooks/tripleo-ci-periodic-base-upload/post.yaml | 20:16 |
weshay|ruck | is how the images are uploaded | 20:16 |
weshay|ruck | rlandy, k thanks | 20:16 |
dviroel | weshay|ruck: right, there is a script that do rsync to send the images to the server | 20:16 |
weshay|ruck | dviroel, the images are promoted via the promoter | 20:17 |
weshay|ruck | dviroel, links.. https://github.com/rdo-infra/ci-config/blob/master/ci-scripts/dlrnapi_promoter/qcow_client.py#L165 | 20:18 |
weshay|ruck | dviroel, now.. 1 note.. we can use the promoter server for this... or we can use a zuul job.. | 20:19 |
weshay|ruck | dviroel, I don't think we've discussed that too much.. I've been assuming a zuul job.. but perhaps that's not ideal | 20:20 |
weshay|ruck | dviroel, if you have more questions.. or need more context.. just holler.. | 20:20 |
weshay|ruck | maybe a little louder | 20:21 |
dviroel | lol | 20:21 |
dviroel | weshay|ruck: ok, first time that I'm looking at this promoter code | 20:21 |
dviroel | i was considering the zuul job only | 20:21 |
weshay|ruck | dviroel, ya.. I have to spin on that thought for a bit | 20:29 |
weshay|ruck | and probably discuss w/ rlandy .. | 20:30 |
* rlandy reads back | 20:32 | |
* rlandy thought zuul job - but open to ideas | 20:32 | |
weshay|ruck | rlandy, fyi.. the baremetal jobs aren't critieria for 16.2 is that something we're close to changing back | 20:54 |
rlandy | weshay|ruck: they are criteria for tripleo component | 20:55 |
rlandy | and should be for integration | 20:55 |
rlandy | weshay|ruck: I have a bunch of criteria changes to make | 20:55 |
rlandy | was on my plate for tomorrow to run through those after | 20:55 |
rlandy | we promoted ahead of wednesday's meeting | 20:56 |
rlandy | multinode can come back for 17 etc. | 20:56 |
weshay|ruck | rlandy, ya.. components bm/tripleo have baremetal :) | 20:56 |
weshay|ruck | rlandy, k that all sounds fine.. thanks | 20:57 |
*** dviroel is now known as dviroel|out | 21:41 | |
rlandy | weshay|ruck: going to promote http://osp-trunk.hosted.upshift.rdu2.redhat.com/api-rhel8-osp16-2/api/civotes_agg_detail.html?ref_hash=df1d32143b0a3ce76e993cd1209522ea | 21:58 |
rlandy | bm has one tempest failure | 21:58 |
rlandy | https://sf.hosted.upshift.rdu2.redhat.com/logs/84/195884/106/check/periodic-tripleo-ci-rhel-8-bm_envD-3ctlr_1comp-featureset035-rhos-16.2/017c964/logs/undercloud/var/log/tempest/stestr_results.html | 21:58 |
rlandy | will skip if it reproduces on next run | 21:58 |
rlandy | possibly the same object_storage slow node issue | 21:59 |
rlandy | 16.2 promoted | 22:17 |
weshay|ruck | rlandy++ | 22:25 |
rlandy | k - will take another shot at the container job later | 22:54 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.2 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!