| rlandy | chkumar|rover: hey - you around? | 01:53 |
|---|---|---|
| *** amoralej|off is now known as amoralej | 06:56 | |
| sshnaidm | marios, hey | 07:05 |
| marios | o/ sshnaidm | 07:05 |
| sshnaidm | marios, I'm afraid https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ci/+/801266 doesn't solve the problem | 07:06 |
| sshnaidm | marios, for example it's frozen on any of *multinode_ignored files: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/+/801382 | 07:07 |
| marios | sshnaidm: looking | 07:08 |
| sshnaidm | either we add all of those: https://opendev.org/openstack/tripleo-ci/src/branch/master/zuul.d/multinode-jobs.yaml#L13-L72 | 07:10 |
| marios | sshnaidm: yeah ^^^ this is what i'm trying to decide ... | 07:10 |
| marios | sshnaidm: i mean, on one hand this is just about one job (undercloud-upgrade) and if we do https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ci/+/801383 it means we get a bunch of redundant providers | 07:10 |
| sshnaidm | marios, only in ci repos though | 07:11 |
| sshnaidm | it's branchful template that we run in tripleo-ci | 07:11 |
| marios | sshnaidm: but on the other hand yeah to avoid 801383 we'd have to add all those in the undercloud-upgrade irrelevant | 07:11 |
| marios | sshnaidm: yes only on ci repos agreed but still ... you know how hard it is to merge something there because of he amount of jobs we run (due to the branchful stuffs) | 07:12 |
| sshnaidm | yes, that's why we need to limit jobs there for 2 branches max :) | 07:12 |
| sshnaidm | we can change multinode_ignored there to something more efficient | 07:12 |
| sshnaidm | and meaningful | 07:13 |
| sshnaidm | marios, because every time *multinode_ignored changes, need to make changes in upgrades job too | 07:13 |
| sshnaidm | irrelevant_files are hard to track over all branches | 07:14 |
| sshnaidm | marios, for minimizing jobs in ci repos we can add something custom to branchful template later and see how it works | 07:15 |
| marios | sshnaidm: agree there is more overhead doing it like 801266 and that is something i can accept (if it means we run less jobs on every tripleo-ci/quickstart/extras change). | 07:16 |
| marios | sshnaidm: i am conflicted about how to proceed | 07:16 |
| marios | sshnaidm: i understand the problem you're pointing to | 07:16 |
| marios | sshnaidm: but i also want to avoid the redundant providers | 07:16 |
| marios | sshnaidm: not sure how we can update multinode_ignored to be something more meaningful/efficient | 07:16 |
| sshnaidm | marios, why not? we'll have a set of irrelevant-files for ci repos and will wire it into branchful template | 07:17 |
| marios | sshnaidm: going to remove my -1 and +2 for now. I think we may have to go with the 801383 for now but i'd like to discuss how we can improve the redundant content providers maybe on our next call ? | 07:17 |
| sshnaidm | marios, sure | 07:18 |
| marios | chkumar|rover: fyi this is about https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ci/+/801266 vs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ci/+/801383 ( sshnaidm another example there https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/+/801382 ) | 07:18 |
| sshnaidm | I'll update the patch because of w-1 of Ronelle | 07:20 |
| chkumar|rover | sshnaidm: thank you for working on this, sounds good | 07:32 |
| chkumar|rover | marios: sure | 07:32 |
| rlandy | chkumar|rover: hey ... how are things? | 11:43 |
| chkumar|rover | rlandy: things are good, train got promoted | 11:44 |
| rlandy | chkumar|rover: yeah - sorry for the long message yesterday | 11:44 |
| chkumar|rover | rlandy: master is blocked on ipa due to https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1936776 | 11:44 |
| rlandy | chkumar|rover: I pinged dwilde about that | 11:44 |
| chkumar|rover | rlandy: on ussuri jobs were failing due to validation issue | 11:44 |
| chkumar|rover | patches landed, may be next run will clear it | 11:45 |
| rlandy | chkumar|rover: will be out for a some hours during the day - flying back | 11:45 |
| rlandy | chkumar|rover: will ping you before I leave | 11:45 |
| chkumar|rover | rlandy: safe travels :-) | 11:45 |
| rlandy | chkumar|rover: pls leave me tasks/instructions | 11:45 |
| rlandy | will pick them up when I get home | 11:46 |
| chkumar|rover | rlandy: yes, sure, things are normal today, not activity on upstream side also | 11:46 |
| chkumar|rover | cockpit is not working as expected both upstream and downstream | 11:46 |
| rlandy | chkumar|rover: yeah 0 gate is not reporting | 11:47 |
| rlandy | chkumar|rover: how long have you noticed this? | 11:47 |
| rlandy | I checked with pooja yesterday | 11:48 |
| rlandy | she said the last patch merged was sandeep's - so that must have been last week | 11:48 |
| chkumar|rover | rlandy: yesterday it was showing one in upstream gate failing | 11:48 |
| rlandy | chkumar|rover: so it was working until yesterday? | 11:48 |
| chkumar|rover | yes | 11:49 |
| rlandy | chkumar|rover: might have been the cloud outage over the weekend | 11:49 |
| rlandy | worth restarting it? | 11:49 |
| rlandy | we should check the node it runs on | 11:49 |
| chkumar|rover | rlandy: yes, sure, | 11:49 |
| rlandy | arxcruz: ^^ fyi - also for container copy | 11:49 |
| rlandy | cloud outage ^^ is that still running as expected? | 11:50 |
| chkumar|rover | rlandy: the cloud outage was on PSI na? | 11:51 |
| rlandy | chkumar|rover: there was some issues on vexx as well | 11:54 |
| rlandy | I think | 11:54 |
| rlandy | either way - something hit over the weekend | 11:54 |
| chkumar|rover | ok | 11:55 |
| chkumar|rover | rlandy: I think http://dashboard-ci.tripleo.org/d/Z4vLSmOGk/cockpit?orgId=1 is working fine now, Upstream Zuul queue is correct | 11:59 |
| rlandy | chkumar|rover: if we really had no failures, I guess so | 12:00 |
| rlandy | seems too good to be true :)) | 12:00 |
| rlandy | ah - there is one failure | 12:00 |
| rlandy | chkumar|rover: ^^ let'se see if it shows up | 12:00 |
| sshnaidm | rlandy, chkumar|rover marios are we good with https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ci/+/801383 ? | 12:02 |
| rlandy | sshnaidm: ok by me ... not sure we want to do about https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ci/+/801266 | 12:03 |
| rlandy | akahat: hey - sorry didn't get to the scenario010 stuff yesterday - will update tomorrow | 12:05 |
| sshnaidm | it can go as well, while branchful irrelevant are subset of uc-upgrade files it's fine | 12:05 |
| rlandy | k- +2'ed that one as well | 12:06 |
| marios | sshnaidm: ack need to recheck it will do | 12:07 |
| rlandy | sshnaidm: k - two +2s on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ci/+/801383 | 12:23 |
| rlandy | chkumar|rover; hi - could I get another vote on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-tempest-skiplist/+/801196 | 12:38 |
| rlandy | downstream test | 12:38 |
| chkumar|rover | rlandy: done | 12:40 |
| rlandy | thank you | 12:40 |
| zbr | sshnaidm: can you please have a brief look at https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-repos/+/801029 ? | 12:53 |
| zbr | that is one step towards making tripleo-repos also installable as an ansible collection. | 12:53 |
| zbr | having a single python package would clearly reduce maintenance | 12:54 |
| sshnaidm | looking | 12:55 |
| marios | hold music has sure come a long way /me jives to love train | 13:00 |
| arxcruz | are you guys having problems to join company meeting ? | 13:05 |
| arxcruz | actually, sso is down | 13:05 |
| chkumar|rover | arxcruz: same here | 13:07 |
| *** amoralej is now known as amoralej|lunch | 13:10 | |
| rlandy | chkumar|rover: hmmm .. still shows no gate failures | 14:01 |
| rlandy | def have an issue there | 14:01 |
| chkumar|rover | yes | 14:01 |
| chkumar|rover | https://storage.bhs.cloud.ovh.net/v1/AUTH_dcaab5e32b234d56b626f72581e3644c/zuul_opendev_logs_095/795497/5/gate/tripleo-ci-centos-8-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-updates-train/09547e5/job-output.txt | 14:02 |
| chkumar|rover | undercloud install failed while pulling containers from content provider | 14:02 |
| chkumar|rover | old hash might be used | 14:02 |
| *** amoralej|lunch is now known as amoralej | 14:05 | |
| chkumar|rover | once the job finished, we can do a recheck | 14:05 |
| rlandy | mirrors? | 14:18 |
| chkumar|rover | rlandy: it is sync issue | 14:23 |
| chkumar|rover | rlandy: http://mirror.bhs1.ovh.opendev.org:8080/rdo/centos8-train/current-tripleo/delorean.repo.md5 | 14:24 |
| chkumar|rover | on hard refresh, it is showing synced | 14:24 |
| rlandy | ok | 14:25 |
| chkumar|rover | rlandy: https://paste.opendev.org/raw/807595/ | 14:25 |
| chkumar|rover | will recheck once the job vote back | 14:25 |
| rlandy | chkumar|rover: logging off in half an hour ... | 14:25 |
| chkumar|rover | rlandy: ok | 14:26 |
| rlandy | will pick up tasks later if needed | 14:26 |
| chkumar|rover | rlandy: keep an eye on this review https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-heat-templates/+/795497 | 14:26 |
| chkumar|rover | adding to task | 14:27 |
| rlandy | k | 14:39 |
| *** dviroel is now known as dviroel|lunch | 14:54 | |
| *** dviroel|lunch is now known as dviroel | 16:00 | |
| *** marios is now known as marios|out | 16:22 | |
| frenzy_friday | zbr, Hey, when you get some time pls add this to your review list https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ci-health-queries/+/801498 | 16:38 |
| *** amoralej is now known as amoralej|off | 16:50 | |
| sshnaidm | zbr, commented on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-repos/+/801029 - it will work only after we add this path to our modules path | 17:22 |
| sshnaidm | I can +w, but we need a patch for ansible.cfg as well | 17:22 |
| zbr | sshnaidm: i will double check tomorrow because my impression is that it does not need, but it would be wise to add a minimal test | 17:55 |
| zbr | like a`nsible-doc -m get-hash` kind of. | 17:55 |
| sshnaidm | zbr, tested, it doesn't find it | 17:55 |
| sshnaidm | because it's not a default ansible modules path | 17:56 |
| zbr | can we use pbr/setup.cfg to install module in location that is included in default modules path? | 17:56 |
| zbr | i know that this approach is not really "the ansible way" but we work with what we have | 17:56 |
| zbr | i will see tomorrow and ping you after i make the required changes | 17:57 |
| zbr | thanks for spotting it | 17:57 |
| sshnaidm | it's /usr/share/ansible/plugins/modules/ vs /usr/local/share/ansible/plugins/modules/ | 18:03 |
| sshnaidm | idk why it's installed in "local" | 18:03 |
| sshnaidm | idk why would anything install to "local" tbh, maybe environment difference | 18:03 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.2 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!