Tuesday, 2021-08-03

« Monday, 2021-08-02 Index Wednesday, 2021-08-04 »
*** rlandy|ruck|bbl is now known as rlandy|ruck02:06
*** ykarel|away is now known as ykarel04:45
*** marios is now known as marios|ruck05:50
zbrmorning06:42
zbrmarios|ruck: let me know when you are back. i have a indea about how to speed up progress on tripleo.repos06:48
marios|ruckzbr: k but let me finish my morning rounds and reviews etc if there are reviews gimme06:52
zbrhttps://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ansible/+/787767 may need +W not real review. still it appears that we need weeks of recheck to make it pass.06:54
*** jpena|off is now known as jpena06:54
*** sshnaidm|afk is now known as sshnaidm07:27
sshnaidmzbr, hey, do we have a new molecule release?07:30
sshnaidmzbr, I need it for tripleo-ansible, it's blocked now because of https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/960f74cdeff04e73be57d18a14ca058a/log/job-output.txt#912-92307:31
zbrsshnaidm: i can make a new one, i wanted to do it yesterday but it was too late08:04
zbrsshnaidm: are you sure master is fixing it? asking in order to decide between pre-release and release.08:05
sshnaidmzbr, do you see the error?08:05
sshnaidmzbr, this should fix https://github.com/ansible-community/molecule-podman/pull/4608:06
zbryep. but that looks like a need to release molecule-podman, not molecule itself.08:06
sshnaidmzbr, yeah, you're right, I meant molecule-podman08:07
sshnaidmtoo much molecules08:07
zbrchemistry.... I released molecule and i am doing a pre-release on the podman driver..., as i am not sure about how well it will work08:12
pojadhavmarios|ruck, 0/08:13
pojadhavmarios|ruck, I got bit confused while adding update/upgrades jobs to component line. (https://projects.engineering.redhat.com/browse/TRIPLEOCI-392)08:14
pojadhavmarios|ruck, for each component and for every release. lets say master.. then for master with each component should i need to add (minor update, major upgrade, standalone upgrade and undecloud upgrade jobs in component line) ??08:14
marios|ruckpojadhav: lets start with one of them. minor update for example or undercloud upgrade ?08:15
marios|ruckpojadhav: maybe standalone but point is choose one and start working there08:15
marios|ruckpojadhav: the main trick is going to be to make sure the services we are interested are running in that job so it may need tweaking08:15
marios|ruckpojadhav: e.g for the network component we check the neutron services compute nova etc 08:15
pojadhavmarios|ruck, ack08:16
pojadhavi will do some workaround and will make WIP patch about it for one update/upgrade job for all components, you review and based on it, will move ahead.08:18
zbrsshnaidm: please give it a go, use molecule>=3.4.0 and molecule-podman>=1.0.0a1 08:22
sshnaidmzbr, cool, thanks08:22
* zbr hopes these releases will not explose in his face08:24
* pojadhav brb 1-2 hrs08:33
marios|ruckbiab errand08:36
*** ykarel is now known as ykarel|lunch08:46
marios|ruckchandankumar: v11 good or we waiting for testing? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart/+/803134/10..11 09:55
chandankumarmarios|ruck: waiting for testing09:55
chandankumarrechecked the downstream patch09:55
chandankumarmarios|ruck: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart/+/803307 one special case09:56
marios|ruckchandankumar: i voted on that earlier but looks like you updated it checking09:57
marios|ruckchandankumar: ah bug thanks09:57
*** ykarel|lunch is now known as ykarel10:03
sshnaidmzbr, seems like pypi mirrors are not updated yet in infra11:09
sshnaidmNo matching distribution found for molecule>=3.4.011:09
*** dviroel|out is now known as dviroel11:18
*** jpena is now known as jpena|lunch11:20
*** jpena|lunch is now known as jpena11:23
*** jpena is now known as jpena|lunch11:30
*** rlandy is now known as rlandy|ruck11:39
rlandy|ruckakahat: hi  ...11:40
rlandy|ruckmaster promoter is off atm11:40
rlandy|ruckit was only running containers and images and never dlrn_client11:40
rlandy|ruckwe had to switch allowed_clients to get it to promote11:41
rlandy|ruckbhagyashris: hey - you're back today?11:41
rlandy|ruckok to run the community call?11:41
bhagyashrisrlandy|ruck, yes o am back11:43
akahatrlandy|ruck, let me check 11:44
bhagyashrisrlandy|ruck, yes i am ok to run the call11:44
rlandy|ruckthank you11:44
rlandy|ruckakahat: weshay|ruck stopped the promoter for now  - see comment in tmux11:45
rlandy|ruckmarios|ruck: soniya29|rover: hey - how's life in ruck/rover land?11:45
* akahat checking tmux11:45
marios|ruckrlandy|ruck: o/11:47
marios|ruckrlandy|ruck: nothing new today, watching gate but all seem to be related to the promotion/missing containers etc11:47
weshay|ruckmarios|ruck, is that script that chandan wrote helpful at all?11:47
rlandy|ruckmarios|ruck: really missing containers or just out of sync mirrors?11:47
akahatrlandy|ruck, can you pass me any log link? where you've seen above situation.11:48
marios|ruckweshay|ruck: didn't check to be honest but yeah i'm sure it could be to tell you/confirm about the out of sync issue11:48
rlandy|ruckakahat: no log - it wrote over the master log - 11:48
soniya29|roverrlandy|ruck, I had been checking promotions for master..we have promotion blocker in glance for master due to scenario001-standalone-glance-master11:48
rlandy|ruckno error11:48
marios|ruckrlandy|ruck: well there haven't been new fails after 0723 so i think we are ok 11:48
rlandy|ruckjust never ran dlrn client until we forced it11:48
soniya29|roverrlandy|ruck, we have cix card for the same11:49
akahatrlandy|ruck, is it yesterday night?11:49
akahati mean in your morning time..11:49
rlandy|ruckyep11:49
rlandy|ruckweshay|ruck: marios|ruck: since there are three of us on ruck - probably not needed, I can step back to deal with downstream, scenario010 and other tasks11:51
weshay|ruckmarios|ruck, rlandy|ruck so .. the cockpit appears to be catching gate failures in the list.. that zuul has automatically restarted11:55
weshay|rucke.g. https://f2306f8f62900f770f52-298f4365cc798f0001a632f171eb41d6.ssl.cf5.rackcdn.com/803012/8/gate/tripleo-ci-centos-8-standalone-on-multinode-ipa/9d81687/job-output.txt11:55
weshay|ruckor gerrit is getting updated w/ results11:55
weshay|ruckhttps://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-heat-templates/+/803012/11:55
weshay|ruckI'll try to reduce that noise11:55
weshay|ruckthis is weird11:56
rlandy|ruckweshay|ruck: I noticed that some failures just get restarted11:57
rlandy|ruckthey are still in the gate11:57
weshay|ruckrlandy|ruck, ya.. the log says it did fail though11:58
rlandy|ruckit may have11:58
weshay|ruckbut it didn't report to gerrit, which 11:58
rlandy|ruckbut if the patch above it failed11:58
rlandy|ruckit just gets out back11:58
weshay|ruckmeans.. the jobs were restarted before all the jobs completed11:58
rlandy|rucklike the whole cancelled thing11:58
rlandy|ruckwe are not tracking those results now11:59
rlandy|ruckweshay|ruck: that is what happens when the job above fails the gate, right?12:00
marios|ruckweshay|ruck: rlandy|ruck: this is likely related to the new 'canceled' state that we filtered out12:00
rlandy|ruckthe whole series will be restarted12:00
rlandy|ruckmarios|ruck: ^^ thats's what I exepected above12:01
marios|ruckrlandy|ruck: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ci-config/+/34773 12:01
marios|ruckweshay|ruck: ^12:01
marios|ruckweshay|ruck: so it is valid then i mean the reporting it actually did fail at that point in the gate https://f2306f8f62900f770f52-298f4365cc798f0001a632f171eb41d6.ssl.cf5.rackcdn.com/803012/8/gate/tripleo-ci-centos-8-standalone-on-multinode-ipa/9d81687/job-output.txt 12:01
marios|ruckweshay|ruck: now rerunning in gate https://zuul.openstack.org/status#80301212:02
marios|ruck14:51 < rlandy|ruck> weshay|ruck: marios|ruck: since there are three of us on ruck - probably not needed, I can 12:03
marios|ruckrlandy|ruck: thanks for your help 12:03
marios|ruckrlandy|ruck: do we need to do something with the master promoter wrt the clients update you made for last night promotion? is akahat or bhagyashris already on that? 12:04
rlandy|ruckmarios|ruck: ack - akahat is on it12:04
marios|ruckrlandy|ruck: ack thanks akahat 12:04
rlandy|ruckmarios|ruck: I think that is why we didn't see a promotion over the weekend12:04
rlandy|ruckand we lost the hash12:04
marios|ruckrlandy|ruck: k 12:04
rlandy|ruckit was pushing containers and images - just never did the dlrn piece12:05
rlandy|ruckchandankumar: hey .. is https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart/+/803134 ready to test again?12:07
rlandy|ruckcan try it out on baremetal12:07
chandankumarrlandy|ruck: I need to install tripleo-operator-ansible on zuul node12:12
chandankumarI am figuring out how to do that12:12
chandankumarrlandy|ruck: above patch is not fixing it12:12
akahatrlandy|ruck, i think it is probably because someone turn on dockerfile_client. which is not supported in upstream.12:13
akahatwe have dlrn_client listed after the dockerfile_client.12:13
akahatweshay|ruck, rlandy|ruck should i fix it and start the master promoter server?12:13
marios|ruckrlandy|ruck: weshay|ruck: i am not aware of any changes there re dockerfile_client12:14
marios|ruckakahat: yes fix it and restart 12:14
marios|ruckakahat: please12:14
akahatmarios|ruck, okay. I'll turn it on.12:15
marios|ruckakahat: thanks lets see if we get any more errors 12:15
marios|ruckakahat: so you mean it was like this? https://github.com/rdo-infra/ci-config/blob/master/ci-scripts/dlrnapi_promoter/config_environments/global_defaults.yaml#L3 12:18
akahatMaster is promoting now: http://10.0.148.74/promoter_logs/centos8_master.log12:18
marios|ruckakahat: allowed_clients: registries_client,qcow_client,dlrn_client12:18
rlandy|ruckakahat: I am not sure why anyone would need the dockrfile client12:18
marios|ruckakahat: cos that is what we have in the repo and if we are auto pulling for master that will revert back to ^^ 12:18
marios|ruckakahat: or it had dockerfile_client there 12:18
akahatmarios|ruck, yes. dockerfile_client is new addition to it.. only support for downstream.12:18
marios|ruckakahat: https://github.com/rdo-infra/ci-config/commit/73e1ee229eefcdb88bbd4db1826aa80c597fe6ef looks like something chandankumar added 12:19
rlandy|ruckmarios|ruck: yes - he added it ofr downstream12:19
chandankumarbut it is commented out12:19
marios|ruckakahat: but in the upstream it is commented out 12:19
marios|ruckright12:19
rlandy|ruckand it got pulled into master12:19
marios|ruckchandankumar: ack 12:19
chandankumarwe can control clients from config file also12:19
akahatmarios|ruck, chandankumar knows about downstream ^^12:19
marios|ruckchandankumar: ack 12:19
marios|ruckakahat: ok whatever so you removed dockerfile_client from the allowed_clients on the master promoter now? 12:20
akahatglobal defaults is generic.. we can override it from config files.12:20
akahatmarios|ruck, yes.12:20
marios|ruckakahat: i think we are ok then if it looks like allowed_clients: registries_client,qcow_client,dlrn_client12:20
marios|ruckakahat: ack thanks 12:20
akahatyup12:20
rlandy|ruckthank you12:21
chandankumarweshay|ruck: rlandy|ruck https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart/+/80330712:23
rlandy|ruckchandankumar: looks ok - can we test out ahead of time or we merge and see?12:24
chandankumarrlandy|ruck: https://ci.centos.org/job/tripleo-quickstart-gate-master-tripleo-ci-delorean-full-featureset052/13/console12:25
chandankumarrunning here12:25
chandankumarhttps://ci.centos.org/job/tripleo-quickstart-gate-master-tripleo-ci-delorean-full-featureset052/12:26
rlandy|ruckchandankumar: great - +2'ed that12:28
rlandy|ruckchandankumar: just to check ... | The error appears to be in '/home/zuul/workspace/.quickstart/playbooks/repo-setup-virthost.yml': line 13, 12:30
rlandy|ruckthe virt host is not the zuul node12:30
chandankumarrlandy|ruck: sorry where is the error?12:32
chandankumarrlandy|ruck: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart/+/803134/12/playbooks/provision.yml@3712:32
chandankumarwe are just doing hacks12:32
*** jpena|lunch is now known as jpena12:33
rlandy|ruckchandankumar: on baremetal there are three hosts in play ...12:34
rlandy|ruckzuul node, virthost and the virt undercloud12:35
rlandy|rucklet's see what your current run does12:35
rlandy|ruckI see it just restarted testing12:35
rlandy|ruckbut it looks like it's missing on the virhost12:35
weshay|ruckakahat, rlandy|ruck looks like master containers are being pushed atm to docker.io?12:36
akahatweshay|ruck, yes. master is promoting12:36
rlandy|ruckweshay|ruck: ack12:36
rlandy|ruckfrenzy_friday: hello ...12:36
frenzy_fridayrlandy|ruck,  hey12:36
rlandy|ruckfrenzy_friday: can you look at https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ci-health-queries/+/803246?12:37
rlandy|ruckkept failing on output/elastic-recheck/1938718.yaml12:37
frenzy_fridaychecking12:37
rlandy|ruckwhether we added the file or not12:37
rlandy|ruckfrenzy_friday: ^^ 12:37
rlandy|ruck2021-08-02 20:14:49.891671 | ubuntu-focal | ERROR: Git reported dirty status. Git should never report dirty status at the end of testing, regardless if status is passed, failed or aborted.12:38
rlandy|ruck2021-08-02 20:14:49.897247 | ubuntu-focal | On branch master12:38
rlandy|ruck2021-08-02 20:14:49.897283 | ubuntu-focal | Changes not staged for commit:12:38
rlandy|ruck2021-08-02 20:14:49.897296 | ubuntu-focal |   (use "git add <file>..." to update what will be committed)12:38
rlandy|ruck2021-08-02 20:14:49.897307 | ubuntu-focal |   (use "git restore <file>..." to discard changes in working directory)12:38
rlandy|ruck2021-08-02 20:14:49.897317 | ubuntu-focal | modified:   output/elastic-recheck/1938718.yaml12:38
rlandy|ruckfrenzy_friday: ^^12:38
frenzy_fridayrlandy|ruck, running tox locally, lemme see if tox tries to modify any files12:41
rlandy|ruckfrenzy_friday: did we need to add the output/elastic-recheck/1938718.yaml file12:42
rlandy|ruckor should it have been generated12:42
bhagyashrisis anyone facing issue to fetch and git review the patch on rdo gerrit?12:42
rlandy|ruckalso - does the message have to match?12:42
rlandy|ruckfrenzy_friday: ^^12:42
frenzy_fridayrlandy|ruck, it will be generated when you run tox locally. Then you need to add it to the commit. But it is already added in the patch12:42
rlandy|ruckfrenzy_friday: it wasnt12:42
soniya|roverweshay|ruck, just a sec, network issues here12:43
rlandy|ruckfrenzy_friday: created it manually12:43
rlandy|ruckthat may have been the issue12:43
frenzy_fridayrlandy|ruck, you had to create https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ci-health-queries/+/803246/4/output/elastic-recheck/1938718.yaml manually?12:43
rlandy|ruckfrenzy_friday: yep12:43
rlandy|ruckfrenzy_friday: you can delete it and rerun tox12:44
rlandy|ruckand see what happens12:44
frenzy_fridaychecking12:44
rlandy|ruckfrenzy_friday: weshay|ruck originally submitted that review12:44
rlandy|ruckI just added the file due to the error12:44
frenzy_fridayrlandy|ruck, updated it. Looks like output/elastic-recheck/1938718.yaml 's content was wrong and tox was trying to overwrite it12:52
frenzy_fridayoutput/elastic-recheck/1938718.yaml will be automatically created when you run tox locally. You just have to commit it12:52
rlandy|ruckfrenzy_friday: it wasn;t - I think because tox fails out on:12:53
rlandy|ruckTASK [Run sova task] *****************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************12:53
rlandy|ruckfatal: [localhost]: FAILED! => {"changed": false, "msg": "Can't write result to file ../.tox/py38/log/sova.log: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '../.tox/py38/log/sova.log'"}12:53
rlandy|ruckweshay|ruck's review didn't have it either12:53
rlandy|ruckfrenzy_friday: ^^ how do we fix that tox error12:54
rlandy|ruckthat's the real problem12:54
frenzy_friday./.tox/py38/log/ should be generated by tox by default12:54
rlandy|ruckfrenzy_friday: is the path right? ../.tox12:55
rlandy|ruckwhy ..12:55
rlandy|ruckfrom the tripleo-ci-health-queries, it's just .tox12:55
frenzy_fridayyes, I remember in you machine tox didnt create a folder called "py<your python version>" It created only py. Maybe its the same problem. Lemme check on another system12:56
rlandy|ruckmaybe because there are two dirs .tox/.tox?12:56
rlandy|ruckthe folder is just py12:57
rlandy|rucknot py3812:57
frenzy_fridayrlandy|ruck, hm... in zuul and in my machine it always creates py<version> Lemme see if I can update the check job to look for py if it doesnt find py<version>12:59
akahatmaster promotion failed13:06
akahatpromoter failed: [localhost] (item=['f9f6cd88fc4d3ac2a3d3696d5f1a4780', 'openstack-ironic-inspector']) => {"ansible_loop_var": "item", "changed": false, "item": ["f9f6cd88fc4d3ac2a3d3696d5f1a4780", "openstack-ironic-inspector"], "msg": "Error pushing image docker.io/tripleomaster/openstack-ironic-inspector: UnixHTTPConnectionPool(host='localhost', port=None): Read timed out."}13:06
frenzy_fridayrlandy|ruck, you can merge https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ci-health-queries/+/80324613:10
rlandy|ruckfrenzy_friday: sure13:10
frenzy_fridayIn 30-45 mins after merge it should be up here http://health.sbarnea.com:5001/13:10
rlandy|ruckthanks13:10
weshay|ruckfrenzy_friday, rlandy|ruck 0/ can we chat for 5min?13:11
frenzy_fridayweshay|ruck, yep sure13:11
rlandy|ruckyep13:11
weshay|ruckmeet.google.com/uyv-nywk-qdt13:12
chandankumarrlandy|ruck: marios|ruck taking a different approach https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ci/+/80333613:22
bhagyashrisarxcruz, zbr, sshnaidm, rlandy|ruck , marios|ruck , ysandeep, bhagyashris, svyas, soniya|rover  pojadhav, akahat, weshay|ruck , chandankumar, frenzy_friday, dviroel13:22
marios|ruckchandankumar: k will check 13:22
bhagyashrisTripleo CI community meeting in 8 mins13:22
marios|ruckbrb13:22
chandankumarbhagyashris: will skip the community meeting got some work13:22
bhagyashrischandankumar, ack13:23
bhagyashrisfeel free to add agenda here https://hackmd.io/MMg4WDbYSqOQUhU2Kj8zNg?both#2021-08-03-Community-Call @ line number 3113:23
bhagyashrishttps://meet.google.com/bqx-xwht-wky?authuser=013:23
weshay|ruckhey.. we have a good mtg today  arxcruz, zbr, sshnaidm, rlandy|ruck , marios|ruck , ysandeep, bhagyashris, svyas, soniya|rover  pojadhav, akahat, weshay|ruck , chandankumar, frenzy_friday, dviroel13:31
weshay|ruckarxcruz, I added tempest whitelist to the agenda13:40
weshay|ruckok?13:40
weshay|ruckor punt13:40
weshay|ruckwe discussed in scrum yesterday13:40
arxcruzweshay|ruck: ok 13:40
weshay|ruck:)13:40
holserHi folks14:02
holsercan anyone explain https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-upgrade/+/80317214:02
holserwhy we have tripleo-ci-centos-8-content-provider-ussuri and tripleo-ci-centos-8-content-provider-train at the same time14:03
holserin ussuri jobs14:03
rlandy|ruckholser: the content provider provides the containers needed to run tests14:15
rlandy|ruckif we upgrade from train to ussuri in a job14:15
rlandy|ruckwe would need both providers within the job run set14:15
holserrlandy|ruck thanks14:17
*** ykarel is now known as ykarel|away14:52
* dviroel lunch14:54
sshnaidmzbr, when will be possible to get new molecule-podman from pypi? I see there still old version: https://pypi.org/project/molecule-podman/14:55
zbrsshnaidm: i not old, check https://pypi.org/project/molecule-podman/#history 14:55
zbrnew ones are pre-releases, you need to be explicit with pip to install them14:56
zbrthere reason is like that is that i have to yank that module twice due to being a bad release14:56
sshnaidmack, and molecule is 3.3.4, right? Because I don't see 3.4.0 there14:57
zbrhmm, that is not ok...14:57
zbrhehe, i forgot to approve my own release.14:58
zbrcheck again in 2-3mins, it should be there.14:58
zbrhttps://github.com/ansible-community/molecule/runs/3228638971?check_suite_focus=true14:58
*** jpena is now known as jpena|off15:06
zbrmarios|ruck: or chandankumar: upgrade vote on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-repos/+/800462 -- i already explained cloudnull the context and he +2 it.15:18
marios|ruckzbr: ack will check again but not right now15:19
pojadhavweshay|ruck, rlandy|ruck : please review and merge if think it is good to go except config one. https://review.rdoproject.org/r/q/topic:%2522refactor_job_names%2522+(status:open+OR+status:open)15:25
* dviroel back15:55
soniya|roverweshay|ruck, rlandy|ruck, marios|ruck, leaving for today16:03
rlandy|rucksoniya|rover: sure - have a good night16:04
weshay|rucksoniya|rover, k.. thanks for pinging.. marios|ruck soniya|rover anything for us to pick up?16:04
soniya|roverweshay|ruck, nope16:04
soniya|roverrlandy|ruck, thanks :)16:05
marios|ruckweshay|ruck: not from me16:12
marios|ruckweshay|ruck: i added a note about promotion chasing to gchat https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/testproject/+/3483816:12
marios|ruckweshay|ruck: off in few mins too 16:13
weshay|ruckmarios|ruck, roger.. will watch it16:15
weshay|ruckthanks16:15
marios|ruckthanks weshay|ruck 16:22
rlandy|ruckweshay|ruck: sent you an invite to the tempest whitelist meeting - it's a clash for you - just an FYI, arxcruz and I can start this work16:23
weshay|ruckrlandy|ruck, k16:26
weshay|ruckI can follow a hackmd and help from there16:26
rlandy|ruckweshay|ruck: yeah - then we can book a time to do the merge damage16:27
chandankumarweshay|ruck: rlandy|ruck if this https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ci/+/803336 works here https://code.engineering.redhat.com/gerrit/c/testproject/+/200295 and then merge it16:27
weshay|ruckchandankumar, aye aye captain16:27
chandankumarfew exceptional cases16:28
rlandy|ruckchandankumar: ack16:28
* rlandy|ruck checks test job16:28
rlandy|ruckwe should know - the failure is pretty early16:28
rlandy|ruckas soon as it starts the vm16:29
rlandy|ruckthanks for working on that16:29
rlandy|ruckchandankumar: we're clear on the ci.centos review right?16:29
rlandy|ruckit go w+'ed great16:30
rlandy|ruckthanks16:30
chandankumarrlandy|ruck: yes16:30
chandankumarrlandy|ruck: we tested it16:30
rlandy|ruckperfect!16:30
*** marios|ruck is now known as marios|out16:30
rlandy|ruckthank you, sir16:30
*** ssbarnea[m] is now known as zbr16:31
weshay|ruckrlandy|ruck, my conflict is just a df bug triage16:32
weshay|ruckcan skip16:32
rlandy|ruckok16:32
zbrtest16:32
*** dviroel is now known as dviroel|brb17:34
rlandy|ruckchandankumar++ https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ci/+/803336 looking good so far17:40
*** dviroel|brb is now known as dviroel18:42
rlandy|ruckweshay|ruck: this looks good - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ci/+/80333618:58
rlandy|ruckpls vote18:58
rlandy|rucknjohnston: hi - how would you like to handle scenario010 failures?20:18
rlandy|ruckwe had scenario010 passing in 16.2 until the current integration hash20:19
rlandy|ruckthe train equivalent job is also failing20:19
rlandy|ruckdo you want LP?20:19
njohnstonrlandy|ruck: Definitely!  20:35
rlandy|rucknjohnston: k ...20:35
rlandy|ruckwe merged the changes to separate train and ussuri branches20:35
rlandy|rucknjohnston: CIX?20:36
rlandy|ruckjust making sure you're ok with these arriving on the CIX board20:36
rlandy|ruckthey were never criteria20:36
njohnstonrlandy|ruck: Yes, I am absolutely fine handling them through the CIX process20:36
rlandy|ruckbut since we did have them passing in 16.220:36
rlandy|rucka pity to have a regression20:36
rlandy|ruckk - coming up20:36
njohnstonrlandy|ruck: thanks!20:37
*** dviroel is now known as dviroel|out20:54
rlandy|rucknjohnston: https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/193883420:56
« Monday, 2021-08-02 Index Wednesday, 2021-08-04 »

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.2 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!