*** bhagyashris is now known as bhagyashris|rover | 04:43 | |
*** ysandeep|away is now known as ysandeep| | 04:48 | |
*** pojadhav- is now known as pojadhav | 05:44 | |
*** ykarel__ is now known as ykarel | 05:51 | |
*** ysandeep| is now known as ysandeep | 05:57 | |
chandankumar | frenzy_friday: hello, please have a look at https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-jobs/+/35831 this review when free, thanks! | 06:49 |
---|---|---|
*** ysandeep is now known as ysandeep|brb | 07:00 | |
*** amoralej|off is now known as amoralej | 07:00 | |
*** ykarel__ is now known as ykarel | 07:15 | |
*** ysandeep|brb is now known as ysandeep | 07:27 | |
*** jpena|off is now known as jpena | 07:32 | |
ysandeep | chandankumar: do you mind if I create component-ci-testing / promoted-components / tripleo-ci-testing hash with depends-On frenzy_friday patches via a testproject? | 07:33 |
ysandeep | for centos9 | 07:33 |
chandankumar | ysandeep: yes sure | 07:33 |
ysandeep | component criteria is missing, i will post something | 07:33 |
chandankumar | ysandeep: wait finding the patch | 07:34 |
chandankumar | ysandeep: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ci-config/+/35832 | 07:34 |
chandankumar | I think it got pushed at wrong place | 07:35 |
chandankumar | ysandeep: can you move this file https://github.com/rdo-infra/ci-config/blob/master/ci-scripts/dlrnapi_promoter/config/CentOS-9/master-centos-9.yaml to CentOS-9/component/master.yaml | 07:36 |
chandankumar | ? | 07:36 |
ysandeep | chandankumar: thanks will take care of that | 07:37 |
ysandeep | bhagyashris|rover, arxcruz|ruck mol-get_hash-centos-7 job against ci-config repo is failing, Is it known? | 07:51 |
ysandeep | https://review.rdoproject.org/zuul/builds?job_name=mol-get_hash-centos-7 | 07:51 |
ysandeep | chandankumar, frenzy_friday the promote-consistent-to-component-ci-testing we created is not working because virtualenv is not present. | 07:54 |
ysandeep | https://logserver.rdoproject.org/54/35554/4/check/periodic-tripleo-centos-9-master-component-baremetal-promote-consistent-to-component-ci-testing/005a6cf/job-output.txt | 07:54 |
chandankumar | ysandeep: yes, it is a known issue | 07:57 |
bhagyashris|rover | ysandeep, not sure looking | 07:57 |
chandankumar | ysandeep: in cs9 nodepool image, virtualenv is not installed by default | 07:57 |
chandankumar | we need to install specifically | 07:57 |
chandankumar | ysandeep: want to move to python3 -m venv module here from cs8 or cs9 onwards here? | 07:58 |
ysandeep | yes, I think that will be better | 07:58 |
chandankumar | ysandeep: for c7, not sure python3 -m venv is availabler | 07:59 |
chandankumar | ysandeep: for c7, not sure python3 -m venv is available | 07:59 |
ysandeep | i will check that, If its not available we can do that cs8 onwards | 08:00 |
ysandeep | bhagyashris|rover: thanks! | 08:00 |
frenzy_friday | chandankumar, ysandeep here right https://github.com/rdo-infra/ci-config/blob/master/ci-scripts/tripleo-upstream/dlrnapi_venv.sh#L3 ? | 08:01 |
ykarel | ysandeep, python3 is available in c7, you can get that installed and use venv | 08:01 |
chandankumar | frenzy_friday: yes | 08:01 |
ykarel | iirc since c7.7 it's there | 08:01 |
ysandeep | ykarel: thanks! | 08:02 |
ykarel | not sure if nodepool images have it installed, but better be explicit where ever used | 08:02 |
chandankumar | CentOS Linux release 7.9.2009 (Core) is used for c7 jobs | 08:03 |
chandankumar | ykarel: good point | 08:03 |
ykarel | yes that's the latest so nodepool images will be based on that | 08:03 |
* ysandeep checking why we reverted https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ci-config/+/28171 , Enforce use of python3 for promoter | 08:07 | |
ysandeep | ^^ in that patch we have moved to usage to "python3 -m venv" | 08:07 |
ysandeep | chandankumar: do you know why we reverted https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ci-config/+/28171 | 08:13 |
ysandeep | No context on commit message | 08:13 |
chandankumar | ysandeep: not sure | 08:15 |
chandankumar | ysandeep: sorry nope | 08:15 |
ysandeep | we tried to revert the revert here: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ci-config/+/28208 but that was abandoned | 08:15 |
chandankumar | ysandeep: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ci-config/+/28170 | 08:16 |
chandankumar | they were hitting unbound error | 08:16 |
chandankumar | it got abandoned | 08:16 |
ysandeep | chandankumar, that was fixed here: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ci-config/+/28209 | 08:16 |
chandankumar | ysandeep: yes | 08:18 |
ysandeep | chandankumar, thinking what would be better approach here.. Reenforce the use of python3 for promoter or just update https://github.com/rdo-infra/ci-config/blob/master/ci-scripts/tripleo-upstream/dlrnapi_venv.sh#L3 | 08:19 |
chandankumar | those changes were an year old approx, may be we should retry with some condition, if virtualenv command found, | 08:20 |
chandankumar | then use that command, if not use python3 -m venv | 08:20 |
chandankumar | command -v virtualenv | 08:21 |
chandankumar | ysandeep: I would suggest go with https://github.com/rdo-infra/ci-config/blob/master/ci-scripts/tripleo-upstream/dlrnapi_venv.sh#L3 | 08:23 |
ysandeep | yes we can try that for the meantime, and once we "enforce the use of python3 for promoter" we clean this up. | 08:23 |
chandankumar | ysandeep: max breakage all jobs and ci centos jobs | 08:24 |
chandankumar | in rdo side | 08:24 |
chandankumar | ysandeep: ok | 08:25 |
ysandeep | ack, let me post something based on if [ $(command -v virtualenv) ]; then .. and see how it goes | 08:25 |
amoralej | chandankumar, are you still using centos9-master-preview instance somehwere? | 08:28 |
amoralej | i'm thinking in moving centos9 symlink to centos9-master | 08:28 |
amoralej | as first step to remove centos9-master-preview | 08:29 |
chandankumar | amoralej: nope, all patches switched to centos9-master | 08:31 |
chandankumar | amoralej: sure | 08:32 |
amoralej | cool, thanks! | 08:32 |
ysandeep | chandankumar, ykarel trying.. https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ci-config/+/36158 | 08:41 |
ykarel | ack | 08:43 |
*** ykarel is now known as ykarel|lunch | 09:05 | |
*** ysandeep is now known as ysandeep|lunch | 09:33 | |
marios | tripleo-ci o/ please add to your reviews https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ci/+/810261 | 10:09 |
marios | sshnaidm: chandankumar: ysandeep|lunch: pojadhav: ^ | 10:09 |
*** ykarel|lunch is now known as ykarel | 10:21 | |
*** ysandeep|lunch is now known as ysandeep | 10:26 | |
chandankumar | sshnaidm: marios amoralej ysandeep|lunch bhagyashris|rover pojadhav frenzy_friday arxcruz|ruck dviroel|afk https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-common/+/800580 is ready for review, please have a look when free, thanks! | 10:26 |
ysandeep | marios: ack o/ | 10:26 |
frenzy_friday | chandankumar, ack, checking in some time | 10:26 |
ysandeep | chandankumar, ack | 10:29 |
ysandeep | bhagyashris|rover, hey o/ did you any existing bug for c7 molecule job? | 10:31 |
bhagyashris|rover | ysandeep, nope | 10:37 |
chandankumar | ysandeep: can you rebase this https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ci-config/+/36158 on top of master | 10:37 |
ysandeep | https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1945682 | 10:37 |
ysandeep | bhagyashris|rover, ^^ | 10:37 |
chandankumar | ysandeep: not sure https://logserver.rdoproject.org/54/35554/7/check/periodic-tripleo-centos-9-master-component-baremetal-promote-consistent-to-component-ci-testing/896c84d/job-output.txt here parent patch is not working | 10:38 |
bhagyashris|rover | ysandeep, ack thanks | 10:38 |
ysandeep | bhagyashris|rover, seems bit related | 10:38 |
ysandeep | chandankumar, rebased on master | 10:39 |
chandankumar | ysandeep: thanks! | 10:39 |
ysandeep | chandankumar, i think that's because get_hash role is called by trusted repo | 10:40 |
ysandeep | 2021-10-11 09:54:39.418592 | RUN START: [trusted : review.rdoproject.org/config/playbooks/tripleo-ci-base-promote-hash/run.yaml@master] | 10:40 |
chandankumar | ysandeep: ah yes, | 10:40 |
chandankumar | ysandeep: for time being, we can make c7 job non voting | 10:40 |
chandankumar | and get it merged to unblock ourself | 10:40 |
ysandeep | chandankumar, yeah i was waiting for bhagyashris|rover to report a bug for that issue. | 10:41 |
*** rlandy is now known as rlandy|ruck | 10:41 | |
rlandy|ruck | ysandeep: chandankumar: hi - what's up with promote? | 10:42 |
ysandeep | bhagyashris|rover: I can report a bug for that issue if you are occupied with other things. | 10:42 |
bhagyashris|rover | ysandeep, ok, now i am free if you are busy then i can report | 10:43 |
rlandy|ruck | bhagyashris|rover: arxcruz|ruck: how are things? | 10:43 |
rlandy|ruck | bhagyashris|rover: another c7 issue? | 10:43 |
ysandeep | bhagyashris|rover: thanks please go ahead if you have b.w | 10:44 |
bhagyashris|rover | rlandy|ruck, good promoted master, wallaby, victoria and c8 train | 10:45 |
bhagyashris|rover | yes | 10:45 |
rlandy|ruck | bhagyashris|rover: what's the issue with c7? | 10:45 |
bhagyashris|rover | rlandy|ruck, yes https://review.rdoproject.org/zuul/builds?job_name=mol-get_hash-centos-7 | 10:45 |
rlandy|ruck | bhagyashris|rover: ah - fallout from infra change | 10:46 |
rlandy|ruck | pls bug that and we need to report to openstack-infra t | 10:46 |
rlandy|ruck | to clark and fungi | 10:46 |
arxcruz|ruck | rlandy|ruck: nothing from my side except the mol failure as bhagyashris|rover pointed | 10:47 |
rlandy|ruck | arxcruz|ruck: bhagyashris|rover: we had a pervious CIX | 10:47 |
rlandy|ruck | previous | 10:47 |
rlandy|ruck | then they fixed some stuff | 10:47 |
bhagyashris|rover | rlandy|ruck, arxcruz|ruck ysandeep https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1946641 | 10:48 |
bhagyashris|rover | fyi ^ | 10:48 |
rlandy|ruck | bhagyashris|rover: arxcruz|ruck: ysandeep: https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1945682 | 10:48 |
rlandy|ruck | previous issue | 10:49 |
bhagyashris|rover | rlandy|ruck, ack | 10:49 |
rlandy|ruck | we need to take this one to openstack-infra | 10:51 |
ysandeep | bhagyashris|rover, thanks.. marking it non-voting in my patch to unblock me: | 10:51 |
ysandeep | https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ci-config/+/36156 | 10:51 |
rlandy|ruck | oh - it's in rdo | 10:51 |
bhagyashris|rover | ysandeep, ok. | 10:51 |
ysandeep | chandankumar, ^^ | 10:51 |
rlandy|ruck | bhagyashris|rover: is that error only showing up in rdo jobs? not in upstream infra? | 10:52 |
chandankumar | ysandeep: may be move it to a seperate patch? So that we can just do a revert once fix is available | 10:52 |
ysandeep | chandankumar, ack | 10:52 |
chandankumar | or fix will contain the nv removal | 10:52 |
bhagyashris|rover | rlandy|ruck, not much stuff in queue in the upstream so not observed | 10:53 |
rlandy|ruck | will talk with chandankumar about it in a few | 10:54 |
rlandy|ruck | w may be missing the same fix in rdo | 10:54 |
bhagyashris|rover | but openstack-tox-molecule is passing on upstream on few of the patches | 10:54 |
chandankumar | akahat: ^^ you are looking into mol c7 failure na? | 10:54 |
akahat | chandankumar, yes. https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ci-config/+/36166 | 10:55 |
rlandy|ruck | see the fix from upstream | 10:56 |
rlandy|ruck | bhagyashris|rover: any news on https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1946600? | 10:56 |
rlandy|ruck | otherwise will follow up at CIX call | 10:56 |
bhagyashris|rover | rlandy|ruck, nope | 10:56 |
ysandeep | bhagyashris|rover, chandankumar, rlandy|ruck https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ci-config/+/36167 | 11:00 |
ysandeep | rlandy|ruck: >>> hi - what's up with promote? - sorry didn't get what you mean. | 11:05 |
chandankumar | rlandy|ruck: akahat https://review.opendev.org/c/zuul/zuul-jobs/+/812005 | 11:05 |
chandankumar | bhagyashris|rover: ^^ | 11:05 |
rlandy|ruck | ysandeep: was just following on the silbing failure | 11:06 |
rlandy|ruck | ysandeep: see the upstream fix | 11:06 |
ysandeep | ack | 11:14 |
rlandy|ruck | arxcruz|ruck: can you join https://meet.google.com/vzm-nrah-qqf?authuser=0 | 11:18 |
*** dviroel|afk is now known as dviroel | 11:18 | |
*** jpena is now known as jpena|lunch | 11:22 | |
dviroel | rlandy|ruck: ade_lee_ fyi https://review.rdoproject.org/zuul/build/3c8def1abd4d4705bdf1c908dfa15120/log/job-output.txt#311 | 11:37 |
*** ykarel_ is now known as ykarel | 11:41 | |
*** amoralej is now known as amoralej|lunch | 11:49 | |
chandankumar | ysandeep: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/testproject/+/35554 and https://trunk.rdoproject.org/centos9-master/component-ci-testing/77/9a/779aed4e7858be7ea168cb38dc7e0764/delorean.repo woot \o/ | 11:49 |
chandankumar | rlandy|ruck: frenzy_friday ^^ | 11:50 |
ysandeep | chandankumar, yeah it worked, running promote job for other components | 11:50 |
rlandy|ruck | very cool!! | 11:50 |
frenzy_friday | chandankumar, ++ | 11:51 |
bhagyashris|rover | chandankumar, ysandeep c9 sync... | 12:00 |
*** jpena|lunch is now known as jpena | 12:16 | |
sshnaidm | rlandy|ruck, https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/diskimage-builder/+/806819 | 12:19 |
marios | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/diskimage-builder/+/806819 | 12:19 |
matbu | o/ folks, I'm wondering if it's possible to add ovb jobs such as tripleo-ci-centos-8-ovb-3ctlr_1comp_1supp-featureset039 in the check & gate jobs for tripleo-validations ? | 12:21 |
matbu | The interesting part for us if the 3 ctrl and 1 compute | 12:22 |
dviroel | arxcruz|ruck: bhagyashris|rover: o/ hi FYI the first yum-config wire up merged, if you folks see any related fail with repos-setup https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart/+/808408 | 12:33 |
arxcruz|ruck | dviroel: great, we know who to blame :D | 12:33 |
arxcruz|ruck | it's always important | 12:33 |
dviroel | yeah :P | 12:33 |
bhagyashris|rover | dviroel, ack | 12:34 |
bhagyashris|rover | arxcruz|ruck, :D:D:D | 12:34 |
chandankumar | dviroel: awesooooomeeeeeeeee | 12:36 |
akahat | chandankumar, bhagyashris|rover arxcruz|ruck please review when you are free: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ci-config/+/36130 | 12:38 |
bhagyashris|rover | akahat, ack | 12:39 |
bhagyashris|rover | pojadhav, soniya29 rlandy|ruck scrum time | 13:01 |
bhagyashris|rover | dviroel, ^ | 13:01 |
bhagyashris|rover | https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ci-config/+/36130 | 13:07 |
rlandy|ruck | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ci/+/800577 | 13:10 |
bhagyashris|rover | https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ci-config/+/36174 | 13:13 |
*** amoralej|lunch is now known as amoralej | 13:25 | |
dviroel | marios: reboot here https://review.rdoproject.org/zuul/build/3c8def1abd4d4705bdf1c908dfa15120/log/job-output.txt#475 | 13:28 |
ade_lee_ | dviroel, nice! | 13:31 |
ade_lee_ | dviroel, looks like it worked! | 13:32 |
dviroel | ade_lee_: \o/ | 13:38 |
ade_lee | dviroel, yay - so the fix to do the fips job before setting up the network worked | 13:58 |
ade_lee | rlandy|ruck, but the job to run the fips-enabled image didn't :/ | 13:58 |
ysandeep | chandankumar, frenzy_friday fyi.. promote-to-promoted-components failing on https://logserver.rdoproject.org/54/35554/9/check/periodic-tripleo-centos-9-master-component-baremetal-promote-to-promoted-components/b408d79/job-output.txt | 14:00 |
ysandeep | 2021-10-11 09:55:13.622545 | primary | /home/zuul-worker/src/review.rdoproject.org/config/ci-scripts/tripleo-upstream/check-commit-hash-promote-target.sh: line 8: /home/zuul/workspace/hash_info.sh: No such file or directory | 14:00 |
frenzy_friday | checking | 14:01 |
akahat | rlandy|ruck, hey.. could you please join call. so we can start promoter server. | 14:01 |
ysandeep | rlandy|ruck, chandankumar you want to chat about downstream promoter work? Amol and me are on call | 14:01 |
rlandy|ruck | arxcruz|ruck: first update failure in gate - may be unrelated https://bf35cc4d6774257da74a-d960367b3e200891193d3ddd6646d871.ssl.cf2.rackcdn.com/809233/3/gate/tripleo-ci-centos-8-undercloud-upgrade/5fc1965/logs/undercloud/home/zuul/undercloud_upgrade.log | 14:02 |
rlandy|ruck | ysandeep: ack | 14:02 |
rlandy|ruck | joining again | 14:02 |
frenzy_friday | ysandeep, do we need a c9 nodeset in https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/testproject/+/35554/9/.zuul.yaml? | 14:03 |
ysandeep | frenzy_friday, its picking that from parenting | 14:04 |
ysandeep | 2021-10-11 13:53:57.956872 | localhost | Provider: vexxhost-nodepool-sf | 14:04 |
ysandeep | 2021-10-11 13:53:57.956912 | localhost | Label: cloud-centos-9-stream | 14:04 |
frenzy_friday | oh, right | 14:04 |
arxcruz|ruck | rlandy|ruck: it's unrelated, i checked already | 14:04 |
dviroel | ade_lee: seems so, not sure if you want to check something else in the logs, but the role was executed indeed :) | 14:10 |
dviroel | ade_lee: we can continue with zuul-jobs patch for testing, and if people reject it, we will need to proceed with another workaroung right after multinode/pre, in tripleo-ci playbooks, something like rerun network config after rebooting node | 14:12 |
chandankumar | ysandeep: fix is coming | 14:19 |
ysandeep | chandankumar++ | 14:20 |
ysandeep | rlandy|ruck: could you please review https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ci-config/+/36174 when time permits. | 14:20 |
rlandy|ruck | akahat++ very nice | 14:20 |
ysandeep | thanks akahat and chandankumar! | 14:21 |
rlandy|ruck | ade_lee: yep - ok - saw that - I have time in the afternoon to look at that | 14:21 |
rlandy|ruck | sshnaidm, thanks for following up on the health server names | 14:22 |
sshnaidm | rlandy|ruck, np | 14:23 |
*** ykarel_ is now known as ykarel | 14:27 | |
*** ykarel is now known as ykarel|away | 14:30 | |
* dviroel lunch | 14:57 | |
ysandeep | rlandy|ruck, chandankumar do we already have a c9 nodepool image in upstream? | 15:18 |
rlandy|ruck | ysandeep: in RDO yes | 15:19 |
rlandy|ruck | do you mean upstream infra? | 15:19 |
rlandy|ruck | for check? | 15:19 |
ysandeep | rlandy|ruck: yes for check | 15:19 |
rlandy|ruck | idk - let's check | 15:20 |
rlandy|ruck | if not, we should get rdo infra to approach openstack infra | 15:20 |
rlandy|ruck | so it's the same node from the same repos | 15:20 |
rlandy|ruck | ie: we are not running on two diff repos sets on RDO and upstream | 15:21 |
rlandy|ruck | ysandeep: sorry was just adding PTG etherpad | 15:25 |
ysandeep | nw, I am also checking.. I haven't found anything on searching centos-9 | 15:28 |
rlandy|ruck | ysandeep: https://zuul.openstack.org/labels | 15:31 |
rlandy|ruck | that is all I see | 15:31 |
ysandeep | no mention of centos-9 | 15:32 |
ysandeep | I don't think we have anything yet. | 15:32 |
rlandy|ruck | amoralej: ^^ have you had any discussions with openstack-infra wrt centos 9 nodeset? | 15:32 |
rlandy|ruck | for upstream check testing | 15:32 |
amoralej | not | 15:32 |
amoralej | not yet, as i expect we need to wait until centos9 is updated in the mirrors | 15:33 |
rlandy|ruck | amoralej: production repos are not updated in mirrors? | 15:33 |
amoralej | not yet | 15:33 |
amoralej | there is an old one | 15:33 |
rlandy|ruck | do we have an ETA on that? | 15:33 |
amoralej | on friday Dojo event it was something like.... "soon" | 15:34 |
amoralej | :) | 15:34 |
rlandy|ruck | vague but promising :) | 15:34 |
amoralej | yes, i expect it to be in the next days | 15:34 |
rlandy|ruck | amoralej: last question :) ... | 15:34 |
rlandy|ruck | do we need to do anything to get the node label going? | 15:35 |
amoralej | upstream? | 15:35 |
rlandy|ruck | or does openstack-infra just pick this task up? | 15:35 |
rlandy|ruck | yep | 15:35 |
rlandy|ruck | DOB patches? | 15:35 |
amoralej | well, mainly some work in dib | 15:35 |
rlandy|ruck | I am not sure what's needed here | 15:35 |
amoralej | some work is done | 15:35 |
rlandy|ruck | marios was doing some other DIB work for the image builds | 15:36 |
amoralej | but for some stuff we need to have the repos ready | 15:36 |
rlandy|ruck | maybe that helps | 15:36 |
amoralej | but, yes there are some inflight patches related to it | 15:36 |
amoralej | so i expect to not take too long | 15:36 |
amoralej | yeah, there are patches from marios, from sbaker and myself, iirc | 15:36 |
rlandy|ruck | amoralej: ok - thanks - if we see nothing but next week, we'll probably ping you for guidance on what we can do to get this going | 15:37 |
rlandy|ruck | ysandeep: | 15:37 |
amoralej | sure | 15:37 |
rlandy|ruck | thank you! | 15:37 |
amoralej | rlandy|ruck, i did some tests on using dib with the elements used upstream for cs9 and i think it shouldn't take too much effort to make it work | 15:38 |
ysandeep | amoralej: if production repos mirror sync happens this friday.. Can we expect by next week's end we possibly will have a c9 nodepool image in upstream | 15:38 |
rlandy|ruck | k - good to know | 15:38 |
amoralej | well, actually, there is an issue in centos which i'm workarounding locally and may be an issue upstream | 15:39 |
amoralej | i'll fill a bz to rhel team to check if we can get it fixed in the composes asap | 15:39 |
ysandeep | amoralej, thanks! | 15:40 |
rlandy|ruck | arxcruz|ruck: I think we got one now ... https://storage.gra.cloud.ovh.net/v1/AUTH_dcaab5e32b234d56b626f72581e3644c/zuul_opendev_logs_1b2/813332/1/gate/tripleo-ci-centos-8-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-updates-wallaby/1b24950/logs/undercloud/home/zuul/undercloud_install.log | 15:42 |
* rlandy|ruck logs bug | 15:42 | |
amoralej | ysandeep, it's not something that depends on me, so it's hard to give you a time commitment | 15:42 |
ysandeep | amoralej: understood, no worries :D just was looking for a vague timeline when we can expect that. | 15:43 |
marios | amoralej: rlandy|ruck: looks like my one isn't needed just hit abandon on it https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-puppet-elements/+/811712/2#message-a2bff18d4a9bf33c76eca1e6852fd49236cc335e | 15:44 |
marios | amoralej: rlandy|ruck: otherwise i have been consuming sbaker patches via depends-on in https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/testproject/+/35465/ but now those things are merged only a tripleo-ci review there | 15:45 |
marios | amoralej: rlandy|ruck: i think just that one is in the dependency chain https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/diskimage-builder/+/806819 for dib | 15:45 |
arxcruz|ruck | rlandy|ruck: yupm, seems to be the case, need to wait the container provider job finishes to check the logs | 15:46 |
arxcruz|ruck | in the output stream doesn't have anything yet | 15:46 |
rlandy|ruck | arxcruz|ruck: https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1946659 | 15:49 |
rlandy|ruck | details in bug | 15:49 |
rlandy|ruck | let me know if you disagree | 15:49 |
*** ysandeep is now known as ysandeep|out | 15:50 | |
amoralej | rlandy|ruck, ysandeep|out marios https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2012924 that's a bug i've found with dib and cs9 | 15:53 |
rlandy|ruck | amoralej: great - thanks | 15:53 |
arxcruz|ruck | rlandy|ruck: seems to be the case yes | 15:53 |
rlandy|ruck | arxcruz|ruck: added more notes | 15:54 |
rlandy|ruck | arxcruz|ruck: I didn't CIX this yet | 15:59 |
arxcruz|ruck | rlandy|ruck: ok, i'll take a look | 15:59 |
rlandy|ruck | if we don't have a solution by EoD, let me know and I will | 15:59 |
arxcruz|ruck | i'm taking a look now | 15:59 |
rlandy|ruck | arxcruz|ruck: thank you | 15:59 |
rlandy|ruck | emit releases may be the culprit | 15:59 |
marios | amoralej: thanks | 16:00 |
amoralej | marios, note i've been testing using centos-minimal element instead of centos which is what is used for nodepool in c8 | 16:01 |
marios | amoralej: ack will have a closer look tomorrow /me out | 16:02 |
marios | amoralej: thanks for pointer | 16:02 |
*** marios is now known as marios|out | 16:02 | |
rlandy|ruck | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/diskimage-builder/+/806819 - we need someone with image-builder merge rights there | 16:03 |
* rlandy|ruck waits for stevebaker | 16:03 | |
amoralej | i just rebased https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/diskimage-builder/+/811392 on top oof sbaker patches | 16:13 |
rlandy|ruck | k | 16:13 |
rlandy|ruck | ugh - CIX'ing this | 16:14 |
rlandy|ruck | so we fix it | 16:14 |
rlandy|ruck | um - not the images thing - the mismatched update/upgrades hashes | 16:20 |
*** jpena is now known as jpena|off | 16:45 | |
*** amoralej is now known as amoralej|off | 16:51 | |
*** ysandeep|out is now known as ysandeep | 17:05 | |
ysandeep | chandankumar, hey around o/ | 17:06 |
ysandeep | Were you mentioning putting a fix for this error? - 2021-10-11 09:55:13.622545 | primary | /home/zuul-worker/src/review.rdoproject.org/config/ci-scripts/tripleo-upstream/check-commit-hash-promote-target.sh: line 8: /home/zuul/workspace/hash_info.sh: No such file or directory | 17:06 |
frenzy_friday | make up | 17:49 |
frenzy_friday | sorry, wrong app :D | 17:49 |
*** ysandeep is now known as ysandeep|out | 18:08 | |
ade_lee | rlandy|ruck, hey - did you get a chance to look into the fips-image job? | 19:20 |
rlandy|ruck | ade_lee: hi - just putting the additional changes for rbac tests - then I will look at fips image | 19:31 |
ade_lee | rlandy|ruck, ack thanks | 19:31 |
frenzy_friday | http://ci-health.tripleo.org/ - Thanks Sagi and Dan! | 20:06 |
rlandy|ruck | nice | 20:07 |
rlandy|ruck | ade_lee: working on fips-image patch | 20:07 |
rlandy|ruck | trying to catch the node failure | 20:08 |
ade_lee | rlandy|ruck, ack - ok, let me know if you need help -- I couldn't see anything obvious I could look at before | 20:08 |
ade_lee | hopefully we'll catch some failure we can diagnose | 20:09 |
rlandy|ruck | watching for the node to start | 20:09 |
rlandy|ruck | hmmm ... we're with the node failure | 20:23 |
* rlandy|ruck goes back to ops | 20:24 | |
rlandy|ruck | ade_lee: job starts with a different label | 20:29 |
rlandy|ruck | definitely node label | 20:29 |
* rlandy|ruck will try reach jpena tomorrow morning | 20:30 | |
ade_lee | rlandy|ruck, ok cool thanks | 20:37 |
rlandy|ruck | I think https://softwarefactory-project.io/r/c/config/+/22860 is missing a piece | 20:37 |
rlandy|ruck | ade_lee: sending email - will cc you | 20:51 |
ade_lee | rlandy|ruck, thanks! | 20:51 |
rlandy|ruck | sent - he should answer by our morning | 21:02 |
ade_lee | rlandy|ruck, thanks! | 21:02 |
*** dviroel is now known as dviroel|out | 21:16 | |
*** rlandy|ruck is now known as rlandy|ruck|biab | 21:39 | |
*** rlandy|ruck|biab is now known as rlandy|ruck | 23:20 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.2 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!