*** rlandy|ruck|afk is now known as rlandy|ruck | 00:56 | |
*** sshnaidm is now known as sshnaidm|off | 03:06 | |
*** frenzyfriday|sick is now known as frenzy_friday | 04:25 | |
*** beagles is now known as eagles | 08:58 | |
*** lbragstad6 is now known as lbragstad | 09:12 | |
*** amoralej|off is now known as amoralej | 09:37 | |
*** jpena|off is now known as jpena | 10:36 | |
*** dviroel|out is now known as dviroel|rover | 10:38 | |
dviroel|rover | mornings | 10:38 |
---|---|---|
*** rlandy is now known as rlandy|ruck | 10:43 | |
rlandy|ruck | marios: hello | 10:45 |
rlandy|ruck | marios: started the gchat with steve | 10:45 |
rlandy|ruck | you should be able to see the discussion there | 10:46 |
marios | rlandy|ruck: hi yeah i saw it and saw steve comments on the patch(es) and commented there | 10:46 |
rlandy|ruck | marios: he's also on PTO this coming week :) | 10:46 |
amoralej | chandankumar, rlandy|ruck fyi we have centos-9-stream nodes working in upstream infra | 10:46 |
rlandy|ruck | amoralej++ yay | 10:47 |
rlandy|ruck | yay | 10:47 |
rlandy|ruck | yay | 10:47 |
rlandy|ruck | amoralej: you rock | 10:47 |
marios | :) | 10:47 |
rlandy|ruck | thank you | 10:47 |
amoralej | i'm currently testing in https://review.opendev.org/c/x/packstack/+/816796/ | 10:47 |
amoralej | but apparently it's working fine | 10:47 |
rlandy|ruck | best news today! | 10:47 |
rlandy|ruck | nodeset: | 10:47 |
rlandy|ruck | nodes: | 10:47 |
rlandy|ruck | - name: centos9s | 10:47 |
rlandy|ruck | label: centos-9-stream | 10:47 |
rlandy|ruck | I see | 10:48 |
rlandy|ruck | we will need a new nodeset | 10:48 |
marios | yeh i was about to write the same | 10:48 |
rlandy|ruck | amoralej: chandankumar is on vacation | 10:48 |
rlandy|ruck | sure he'll be happy to come back to this news | 10:48 |
amoralej | ah, it's local holiday in india today | 10:48 |
amoralej | iirc | 10:48 |
rlandy|ruck | yep | 10:48 |
amoralej | good | 10:48 |
rlandy|ruck | this is awesome! | 10:48 |
rlandy|ruck | marios: you adding the nodeset patch or should I? | 10:49 |
rlandy|ruck | goes in tripleo-ci | 10:49 |
marios | rlandy|ruck: sure i can do it | 10:49 |
rlandy|ruck | k - thanks | 10:50 |
rlandy|ruck | frenzy_friday: hey - hope you are better - can you hear us today? | 11:06 |
rlandy|ruck | hmmm - ovb is still hosed downstream | 11:08 |
rlandy|ruck | marios: are you still fighting ovb? | 11:16 |
rlandy|ruck | anything we can help with? | 11:16 |
marios | rlandy|ruck: yeah ... not sure i am digging still but if i don't find something i'll file a bug for it | 11:17 |
rlandy|ruck | marios: ok - going to W+ https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/+/816759 | 11:17 |
rlandy|ruck | we should get rid of the earlier releases | 11:18 |
rlandy|ruck | but that is another battle | 11:18 |
marios | rlandy|ruck: ack | 11:19 |
marios | rlandy|ruck: well we have a card for it i mean 'remove stale stuff' kind of thing but you know priorities | 11:19 |
marios | rlandy|ruck: regarding the earlier releases i mean | 11:19 |
rlandy|ruck | marios: ack - that's our lives | 11:19 |
marios | rlandy|ruck: hmmm | 11:19 |
rlandy|ruck | one day we'll clean up after ourselves | 11:19 |
marios | rlandy|ruck: didn't notice it maybe we can update that patch though | 11:19 |
marios | rlandy|ruck: i mean no need to keep adding it? | 11:20 |
marios | rlandy|ruck: lets remove queens/stein from there? | 11:20 |
rlandy|ruck | marios: sure - let me update | 11:20 |
rlandy|ruck | and you can revote | 11:20 |
marios | rlandy|ruck: ack | 11:20 |
rlandy|ruck | hmmm - -1 on this https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart/+/816313 | 11:27 |
rlandy|ruck | dviroel|rover: hi - good morning | 11:32 |
dviroel|rover | rlandy|ruck: morning | 11:33 |
rlandy|ruck | dviroel|rover: think we are looking good on ruck/rover - just following up on broken OVB in downstream | 11:33 |
rlandy|ruck | 16.2 promoted yesterday | 11:34 |
rlandy|ruck | 17 on wed - so we have some time | 11:34 |
dviroel|rover | rlandy|ruck: great, checking component line atm | 11:34 |
rlandy|ruck | dviroel|rover: downstream cockpit still has results so ++ on that | 11:34 |
rlandy|ruck | dviroel|rover++ for fixing that | 11:34 |
rlandy|ruck | major thanks on that one | 11:35 |
dviroel|rover | rlandy|ruck: will work on updating downstream ansible to work with both configurations | 11:35 |
rlandy|ruck | dviroel|rover: sounds good | 11:35 |
rlandy|ruck | dviroel|rover: review wise, you can check out our list ... https://hackmd.io/FGMoCiRfSNa8puA1BpTQ-Q | 11:36 |
rlandy|ruck | under November 5th | 11:36 |
dviroel|rover | k | 11:36 |
dviroel|rover | :) | 11:36 |
rlandy|ruck | checking on c9 zuul user patches | 11:36 |
rlandy|ruck | marios: fyi .. https://softwarefactory-project.io/r/c/config/+/23057 for zuul user on c9 | 11:37 |
rlandy|ruck | https://softwarefactory-project.io/r/c/config/+/23066 | 11:38 |
rlandy|ruck | both merged | 11:38 |
marios | rlandy|ruck: nice thanks | 11:38 |
rlandy|ruck | https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/config/+/36545 | 11:38 |
rlandy|ruck | still has sagi's -1 on it | 11:38 |
rlandy|ruck | correct? | 11:39 |
rlandy|ruck | marios: ^^ | 11:39 |
rlandy|ruck | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ansible/+/816445 | 11:39 |
rlandy|ruck | and has alex's -1 | 11:39 |
rlandy|ruck | so holding there | 11:39 |
marios | yeah | 11:39 |
marios | rlandy|ruck: i replied to alex comment lets see | 11:39 |
rlandy|ruck | marios: yeah - np | 11:40 |
marios | rlandy|ruck: for now we are working around that one with a hack so | 11:40 |
rlandy|ruck | just checking on reviews that can merge | 11:40 |
marios | ack | 11:40 |
frenzy_friday | rlandy|ruck, hey, yep little better today | 11:46 |
rlandy|ruck | frenzy_friday: good :) | 11:47 |
rlandy|ruck | frenzy_friday: all ok with tripleo health related reviews? | 11:47 |
rlandy|ruck | anything else need to be followed up on? | 11:48 |
rlandy|ruck | frenzy_friday: from monday, let's push on adding more queries | 11:48 |
rlandy|ruck | so we can use the tools | 11:48 |
rlandy|ruck | and test all options | 11:48 |
frenzy_friday | rlandy|ruck, not sure about the upstream-jobs-patch Other than that we can add queries | 11:49 |
rlandy|ruck | frenzy_friday: from daniel? | 11:51 |
rlandy|ruck | dviroel|rover: hmmm ... interesting ... downstream cockpit data ... | 12:57 |
rlandy|ruck | baremetal component | 12:57 |
rlandy|ruck | lists the time as 2021-11-05 12:10:06 | 12:57 |
rlandy|ruck | has a log from 11 -03 | 12:57 |
rlandy|ruck | all the dates are listed as today | 12:58 |
rlandy|ruck | those OVB jobs have been failing for two days | 12:59 |
rlandy|ruck | we have a mismatch there | 13:00 |
dviroel|rover | rlandy|ruck: same thing on upstream | 13:06 |
dviroel|rover | rlandy|ruck: weird, let me check code and give you a feedback | 13:07 |
arxcruz | marios: i think this will solve the problem | 13:09 |
arxcruz | https://opendev.org/openstack/tripleo-ci/src/branch/master/roles/run-test/templates/oooq_common_functions.sh.j2#L18 | 13:09 |
marios | arxcruz: looking | 13:09 |
marios | arxcruz: you mean, instead of passing the dict into emit_releases? work it out before sending? | 13:09 |
marios | arxcruz: ok yeah worth investigating | 13:10 |
arxcruz | marios: yes, you can have the release, and this will return release - 1 | 13:10 |
marios | arxcruz: sure, if it is easier to do that than just passing the dict ... i mean just try it/post it and we can discuss on the review | 13:10 |
marios | arxcruz: fyi, when you post a review, you can run the job with a testproject depending on your review, and you can check releases.sh there https://6f1c1d48d52c3a505672-6109476be9a7a65d8252c7a651ade8fd.ssl.cf5.rackcdn.com/816319/1/check/tripleo-ci-centos-8-undercloud-upgrade/6afe241/logs/quickstart_files/index.html | 13:13 |
marios | arxcruz: it is the result of emit_releases | 13:13 |
marios | arxcruz: so you can sanity check it is doing what you want | 13:13 |
arxcruz | oh, nice | 13:13 |
marios | arxcruz: also the emit_releases_file.log there | 13:14 |
marios | arxcruz: but the result is the releases.sh | 13:14 |
arxcruz | yup, i did not knew about it, good to now, noted | 13:14 |
marios | ack | 13:14 |
arxcruz | s/now/know | 13:15 |
rlandy|ruck | dviroel|rover: thanks | 13:26 |
*** amoralej is now known as amoralej|lunch | 13:48 | |
dviroel|rover | rlandy|ruck: https://code.engineering.redhat.com/gerrit/c/openstack/rrcockpit/+/288406 | 13:58 |
rlandy|ruck | dviroel|rover: looks right to me | 14:03 |
rlandy|ruck | dviroel|rover: we can have ysandeep|pto or sshnaidm|off look at it on monday and then we'll merge | 14:03 |
dviroel|rover | sure, agree | 14:04 |
rlandy|ruck | or merge now and try it out :) | 14:04 |
rlandy|ruck | if you feel like living dangerously | 14:04 |
rlandy|ruck | either way - ok by me | 14:04 |
dviroel|rover | lets wait for more eyes on it, and merge on monday | 14:08 |
*** amoralej|lunch is now known as amoralej | 14:26 | |
rlandy|ruck | dviroel|rover: https://review.rdoproject.org/zuul/builds?job_name=periodic-tripleo-ci-centos-8-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset035-train&pipeline=openstack-periodic-integration-stable4 | 14:54 |
rlandy|ruck | fs035 on train is looking good | 14:55 |
rlandy|ruck | going to lcose out bug and card | 14:55 |
rlandy|ruck | close | 14:55 |
dviroel|rover | awesome, +1 | 14:55 |
rlandy|ruck | putting in patch to add back to criteria | 14:55 |
dviroel|rover | ok | 14:56 |
rlandy|ruck | arxcruz: marios: dviroel|rover: fyi - merging https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-jobs/+/36562 | 15:00 |
rlandy|ruck | rbac jobs will start to show up in master | 15:00 |
rlandy|ruck | know that they will fail to start | 15:00 |
marios | rlandy|ruck: ack | 15:00 |
arxcruz | ok | 15:00 |
rlandy|ruck | marjed non-voting | 15:00 |
rlandy|ruck | marked | 15:00 |
dviroel|rover | ok | 15:01 |
* dviroel|rover lunch | 15:08 | |
jpodivin | Hi everyone. I have a question regarding two featuresets: 040 and 011. Both of them are using scenario multinode.yml but I can't find it in the tht. | 15:08 |
jpodivin | I'm wondering if it didn't get removed at some point, or maybe if I'm not looking for it in a wrong place. | 15:09 |
rlandy|ruck | jpodivin: https://github.com/openstack/tripleo-heat-templates/blob/stable/train/ci/environments/scenario004-multinode-containers.yaml | 15:18 |
rlandy|ruck | those fs are old | 15:18 |
rlandy|ruck | https://github.com/openstack/tripleo-heat-templates/blob/stable/train/ci/environments/multinode-containers.yaml | 15:19 |
rlandy|ruck | etc. | 15:19 |
rlandy|ruck | is what we are using now | 15:19 |
jpodivin | rlandy|ruck: I see, makes me wonder if there is a space to maybe update those featuresets. I could submit some patches changing them so they use multinode-containers (seems to be the closest equivalent). | 15:20 |
jpodivin | actually I have one already. | 15:20 |
rlandy|ruck | https://docs.openstack.org/tripleo-quickstart/latest/feature-configuration.html | 15:25 |
rlandy|ruck | tells you what they used to do | 15:25 |
rlandy|ruck | ^^ you can see what 004 and 011 were meant to do | 15:26 |
rlandy|ruck | standalone took over there | 15:26 |
rlandy|ruck | you can | 15:26 |
rlandy|ruck | if you need the same basic functionality | 15:26 |
rlandy|ruck | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ci/+/816821 | 15:27 |
rlandy|ruck | merging the c9 nodeste | 15:27 |
rlandy|ruck | nodeset | 15:27 |
rlandy|ruck | thanks marios | 15:27 |
*** rcastillo|out is now known as rcastillo | 15:27 | |
marios | rlandy|ruck: ack i rebased my build jobs change onto it too now we have the nodeset (but 3rd party isn't happy, maybe until the nodeset merges?) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ci/+/815108 | 15:28 |
rlandy|ruck | https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ci-config/+/36434 | 15:38 |
rlandy|ruck | dviroel|rover: ^^ revert to get fs035 train back | 15:38 |
jpodivin | rlandy|ruck: should I mark them as deprecate in the docs then? I'm not asking now because of validations CI specifically (we are going to stick with other fs), I'm asking in regards to oooq. | 15:52 |
jpodivin | imho, it would be one less trap for ooo novice. | 15:53 |
rlandy|ruck | jpodivin: yeah - we have a task somewhere to update all our docs etc. | 15:54 |
rlandy|ruck | ysandeep|pto started that | 15:54 |
rlandy|ruck | you know, priorities :) | 15:54 |
rlandy|ruck | feel free to put in a review | 15:54 |
jpodivin | rlandy|ruck: all too well. :) | 15:54 |
jpodivin | Ok, I'm on it. | 15:54 |
rlandy|ruck | ysandeep|pto will likely be happy to see that - he will be back on monday to review | 15:54 |
*** marios is now known as marios|out | 16:16 | |
jpodivin | rlandy|ruck: done | 16:22 |
dviroel|rover | rlandy|ruck: looking at code and the dashboards, the 'Time' column is actualy the timestamp which the data was added to influx db, thats why doesn't match with the job itself | 17:12 |
rlandy|ruck | dviroel|rover: k - on meeting | 17:12 |
rlandy|ruck | will look in a bit | 17:12 |
dviroel|rover | ok | 17:12 |
*** jpena is now known as jpena|off | 17:22 | |
rlandy|ruck | dviroel|rover: k - out of meeting | 17:27 |
rlandy|ruck | dviroel|rover: so that explains why that data is today | 17:27 |
rlandy|ruck | what is confusing is why it's still reporting wednesday's results | 17:27 |
rlandy|ruck | when we were looking at two days of failures | 17:30 |
dviroel|rover | let me check downstream results again | 17:34 |
dviroel|rover | maybe because the hash didn't change, those queries are based in the hash being tested | 17:36 |
rlandy|ruck | ussuri promoting :) | 17:37 |
rlandy|ruck | testprojecting victoria | 17:37 |
dviroel|rover | awesome, tks | 17:37 |
rlandy|ruck | ha - 17 looks right | 17:42 |
*** amoralej is now known as amoralej|off | 17:42 | |
rlandy|ruck | dviroel|rover: maybe it just is that the hash has not rev'ed | 17:42 |
rlandy|ruck | 17 has today's results | 17:42 |
rlandy|ruck | ie: you see the red line for OVB failures | 17:43 |
dviroel|rover | the code gets all jobs from dlrn api, which includes duplicates, but only provides the latest run to influxdb. So even having multiples runs for the same hash, is expected to show only the latest one on top. | 17:45 |
rlandy|ruck | the latest run was red - but ok | 17:47 |
rlandy|ruck | let's go with it | 17:47 |
rlandy|ruck | at leaat now I understand the date | 17:48 |
rlandy|ruck | least | 17:48 |
dviroel|rover | yeah, we can improve this in the future | 17:49 |
dviroel|rover | and avoid many duplicated items in the db | 17:50 |
dviroel|rover | it is adding the same info every 30m | 17:50 |
rlandy|ruck | dviroel|rover: yeah - thanks for looking into it | 18:02 |
rlandy|ruck | dviroel|rover: need to run out for a bit ... | 18:58 |
rlandy|ruck | think we are ok | 18:58 |
rlandy|ruck | 16.2 should promote shortly all jobs passed there | 18:58 |
dviroel|rover | rlandy|ruck: ok, np | 18:58 |
rlandy|ruck | 17 just kicked | 18:58 |
rlandy|ruck | so downstream is looking better | 18:58 |
dviroel|rover | great news for a friday | 18:59 |
rlandy|ruck | biab | 18:59 |
dviroel|rover | k | 18:59 |
*** rlandy|ruck is now known as rlandy|ruck|brb | 18:59 | |
*** rlandy|ruck|brb is now known as rlandy|ruck | 19:24 | |
rlandy|ruck | oh man - we have tox failures all over | 21:12 |
rlandy|ruck | 2021-11-05 20:44:07.405487 | ubuntu-focal | The conflict is caused by: | 21:12 |
rlandy|ruck | 2021-11-05 20:44:07.405497 | ubuntu-focal | jsonschema 3.2.0 depends on setuptools | 21:12 |
rlandy|ruck | 2021-11-05 20:44:07.405516 | ubuntu-focal | The user requested (constraint) setuptools===58.5.2 | 21:12 |
rlandy|ruck | dviroel|rover: just fyi | 21:14 |
rlandy|ruck | reported to infra | 21:14 |
rlandy|ruck | launchpad bugging | 21:15 |
rlandy|ruck | https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1950016 | 21:23 |
dviroel|rover | oh :( | 21:27 |
rlandy|ruck | dviroel|rover: need to log off now | 21:27 |
rlandy|ruck | ade_lee is also commenting on the bug | 21:27 |
rlandy|ruck | altered infra | 21:27 |
rlandy|ruck | update in requirements | 21:28 |
rlandy|ruck | somebody will fix it :) | 21:28 |
dviroel|rover | ok, me too | 21:28 |
rlandy|ruck | have a good weekend | 21:28 |
rlandy|ruck | and thanks for helping out past your shift | 21:28 |
dviroel|rover | you too, see you next monday | 21:29 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.2 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!