Monday, 2022-03-28

*** pojadhav- is now known as pojadhav04:55
*** marios is now known as marios|ruck04:57
marios|ruck\o/04:57
marios|rucksoniya29: o/ 04:57
marios|rucksoniya29: morning anything to report today? lets sync in a bit? 05:01
marios|ruckcan you also renick? soniya29 05:01
marios|ruckthank you raukadah and ysandeep|out for fixing the blocker on friday o/05:05
*** soniya29 is now known as soniya29|ruck05:35
soniya29|ruckmarios|ruck, done05:35
soniya29|ruckmarios|ruck, hello05:36
marios|rucksoniya29|ruck: hi - just catching up a bit lets do a call? can we meet in like 1 hour is that OK for you? 05:36
soniya29|ruckmarios|ruck, yeah..thats okay05:37
*** soniya29|ruck is now known as soniya29|rover05:37
marios|rucksoniya29|ruck: k sent invitation05:38
soniya29|rovermarios|ruck, ack05:39
marios|rucksoniya29|rover: o/ do you have a link to the failing rhos17 multinode please06:18
soniya29|rovermarios|ruck, https://sf.hosted.upshift.rdu2.redhat.com/logs/43/211643/129/check/periodic-tripleo-ci-rhel-9-bm_envB-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001-rhos-17/1094b43/job-output.txt06:18
marios|rucksoniya29|rover: yeah found it thanks added it to the hackmd06:20
*** ysandeep|out is now known as ysandeep06:23
ysandeepsoniya29|rover, hey o/ I am still working on 17 baremetal job - periodic-tripleo-ci-rhel-9-bm_envB-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001-rhos-17 , Its not yet in criteria.06:26
ysandeepInfact it is not in pipeline too06:26
ysandeepmarios|ruck: my pleasure o/06:26
marios|rucksoniya29|rover: o/ lets quick sync? 06:31
soniya29|roversure06:31
soniya29|roverjust a min06:31
soniya29|roverysandeep, okay, it was failing hence i made a record of it06:33
pojadhavmarios|ruck, 0/ hello do you have few mins ?? to understand ussuri tear down stuff requested by ronelle. 06:36
marios|ruckpojadhav: sure lets talk on phone 06:43
marios|ruckpojadhav: https://meet.google.com/udy-msip-eoj?hs=4906:43
pojadhavmarios|ruck, ack06:43
marios|ruckhttps://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/834049 pojadhav 06:45
jpodivinmarios|ruck: I see the https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1966382 is nearing resolution.06:58
marios|rucko/ jpodivin 07:06
-opendevstatus- NOTICE: zuul isn't executing check jobs at the moment, investigation is ongoing, please be patient07:17
ysandeepsoniya29|rover, marios|ruck looks like downstream jobs are stuck for more than 33 hours.07:17
* ysandeep pining infra in internal07:17
ysandeeppinging*07:17
marios|rucksoniya29|rover: can you please follow up with ysandeep ^^^ 07:18
marios|ruckthanks ysandeep 07:18
soniya29|rovermarios|ruck, sure07:19
marios|rucksoniya29|rover: fyi i added collapsible to the hackmd - can you do the same for the rest of them (you can click to expand the details)07:20
soniya29|rovermarios|ruck, ack07:20
*** jpena|off is now known as jpena07:39
* soniya29|rover lunch07:40
*** soniya29|rover is now known as soniya29|rover|lunch07:41
jm1o/07:46
jm1whats up with zuul? not one job is running https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/status ?!?07:46
*** ysandeep is now known as ysandeep|lunch07:49
marios|rucksoniya29|rover|lunch: i am updating the hackmd for the collapsible07:49
marios|ruckjm1: 10:17 -opendevstatus:#opendev- NOTICE: zuul isn’t executing check jobs at the moment, investigation is ongoing, please be patient07:57
jm1marios|ruck: oh, did not know that channel. thanks marios :)07:58
soniya29|rover|lunchmarios|ruck, ack08:02
marios|ruckjm1: ack thanks ysandeep|lunch who noticed it first ;)08:04
jm1ysandeep|lunch++ ;)08:06
*** ysandeep|lunch is now known as ysandeep08:45
jpodivinmarios|ruck: regarding the workaround for #1966382 I'm wondering which projects should need it. Last week when we are triaging the issue, it appeared that only repos without "traditional" python  module structure should need it. Is that still the case? 09:02
marios|ruckjpodivin: are you seeing it somewhere else? brian is working on a couple see #tripleo09:03
marios|ruckjpodivin: otherwise i think we are ok 09:03
marios|ruckjpodivin: if you know of more please go ahead09:04
marios|rucksorry jpodivin not brian brenadn 09:04
marios|ruck:) brendan 09:04
jpodivinmarios|ruck: I know who you meant :) 09:04
ysandeepjpodivin: easy to answer which repo need same fix with quick testing, pip install setuptools=61.0 , clone repo, cd into repo, pip install .09:05
jpodivinmarios|ruck: but regarding your other question. I think that on the whole there shouldn't be that many projects with this issue.09:05
jpodivinysandeep: exactly 09:05
marios|ruckbut 12:03 < marios|ruck> jpodivin: are you seeing it somewhere else? brian is working on a 09:05
marios|ruckjpodivin: hmm actually the gate was stuck this morning so perhaps we will still see more tripleo repos09:06
marios|ruckjpodivin: k if you post anything can you add me to reviews please 09:06
jpodivinmarios|ruck: ack. But imho the gate might be unrelated to the original issue. 09:07
marios|ruckjpodivin: how you mean? 09:07
marios|ruckjpodivin: ah you mean "just cos the gate isn't broken? " - sure but i am ruck and my job is to watch the queues this week so i have to focus on this 09:07
jpodivinmarios|ruck: understood, all I'm saying is that two failures might not have the same cause. 09:08
jpodivinthe original setuptools problem was made more complex by the freeze graph issue.09:08
jpodivinotherwise we would have more patches merged on Friday. 09:09
marios|ruckjpodivin: yeah that freeze graph issue may be related to recent reparenting efforts but as noted should be fixable by adding the setup.py to irrelevant files 09:09
jpodivinmarios|ruck: I'm ... well I know it enables the CI to run and that we need it ... But I'm wondering if we shouldn't flip it around. Rather than to stop one job from triggering make the other one run as well. 09:11
jpodivinIt's too late now, and I don't want to spam the pipelines with DNMs though09:11
jpodivinIn any case it's a minor thing. Arguably the setup.* files are barely touched so we should be fine. 09:12
marios|ruckjpodivin: not sure we need that minor update job for changes to setup.py though i get your point but in this case i think irrelevant files fits09:13
jpodivinAs I said, we should be fine. There are other jobs, most of them fairly low level, that should catch setup file issues.. 09:15
*** soniya29|rover|lunch is now known as soniya29|rover09:18
jpodivinanyway, I'm going to search the projects for more potential problems, see if anything comes up we need to patch. 09:33
ysandeepjpodivin, me patching tht09:34
marios|ruckthanks jpodivin ysandeep 09:34
marios|rucksoniya29|rover: fyi new master/9 tempest issue filed (on the hackmd) 09:35
soniya29|rovermarios|ruck, ack09:35
jpodivinysandeep: btw thanks for the test suggestion, I'm automating that. 09:39
ysandeepjpodivin, please see https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:lp%252F1966382 to track projects that already have fix09:40
* ysandeep checking tripleoclient now09:40
ysandeeptripleoclient is okay without fix09:42
* ysandeep checking tripleo-common now09:42
ysandeeptripleo-common is okay as well without fix09:43
ysandeeptripleo-image-elements need fix, me proposing09:46
ysandeepfolks o/ anyone knows if we use https://github.com/openstack/tripleo-ha-utils anymore?09:58
jpodivinysandeep: ack, I'm going alphabetically. 09:59
ysandeepjpodvin ack i have checked everything tripleo-* and pythontripleoclient10:03
rlandymarios|ruck: soniya29|rover: hello ... need help with anything?10:23
soniya29|roverrlandy, hello10:23
ysandeepwe need to request ananya to put reviewbot on some server10:24
soniya29|roverrlandy, not as such10:24
rlandymarios|ruck: soniya29|rover: let me know if you want to sync10:24
ysandeepfolks o/ please visit https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:lp/1966382+status:open when time allows.10:26
jpodivinysandeep: so far I don't have much in a way of findings. Except for devstack plugins, I'll have to verify them though. 10:28
rlandyjpodivin: can you adjust the commit message length here: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-role-atos-hsm/+/83543210:29
jpodivinomg10:29
jpodivinsorry10:29
ysandeepjpodivin, no worries, thanks for checking, atleast https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:lp/1966382+status:open will take care of projects we are more interested in.10:29
marios|rucko/ rlandy 10:30
marios|ruckrlandy: sure we can catchup on reviews call ... you can check https://hackmd.io/mXb6zsGsTNWWO6Y6UpUNAg?view for status10:30
rlandyok10:30
marios|ruckrlandy: couple new bugs there 10:30
rlandymarios|ruck: ok - so you can just let me know if there is something you want help with10:30
marios|ruckrlandy: will do 10:31
rlandymarios|ruck: left a patch to get fs035 out of ussuri and promote10:32
rlandysoniya29|rover: you don;t need to rerun the rbac test - it's not in criteria10:33
soniya29|roverrlandy, ack10:34
rlandysave you some resources10:34
jpodivinI might have to slow down with the testing, laptop is getting hot :D10:34
jpodivinI might have to slow down with the testing, laptop is getting hot :D10:34
jpodivinWell devstack plugins are fine after all. They can't be installed in the first place. Devstack itself on the other hand is not. 10:37
marios|ruckrlandy: yes i merged it this morning10:39
marios|ruckrlandy: thanks10:39
rlandyok - checking if it promoted10:40
rlandycurrent-tripleo/2022-03-21 13:26 10:40
rlandyum no10:40
rlandyhash may be too old10:41
marios|ruckrlandy: k i will check again later but.. ussuri ;)10:42
marios|ruckrlandy: next week we can nuke 10:42
rlandymarios|ruck: no worries10:42
rlandywas just trying to get it out of your hair10:43
* rlandy checking components10:43
marios|ruckrlandy: thx 10:43
rlandysoniya29|rover: ^^ can you check components downstream? I'm checking upstream10:50
soniya29|roverrlandy, i am upto it10:50
rlandysoniya29|rover: thank you - pls make a list of any that are lagging and we can review10:50
soniya29|roverrlandy, sure10:51
rlandysoniya29|rover: on rr hackmd10:53
rlandyat line 99 added a section to log components that need attention10:53
marios|ruckrlandy: thanks we synced earlier with soniya29|rover and she is watching the d/stream & components for now and I will ping her with any other specific things 10:59
marios|ruckrlandy: you can click on the d/stream fails on the hackmd i made them expandables there is inline trace and soniya29|rover will file bugs for the things that are consistent there (she posted test projects)10:59
rlandymarios|ruck: ack - I read that10:59
ysandeeprlandy, https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-upgrade/+/835409/1#message-979e53a95249af917d784d91586ce4b8d0c657ca11:47
ysandeeprlandy, can you +w this one too11:48
*** dviroel|pto is now known as dviroel11:52
marios|rucksoniya29|rover: are you digging into components upstream that rlandy pointed to ?11:57
marios|rucksoniya29|rover: especially wallaby 8 network needs some attention please 11:58
soniya29|rovermarios|ruck, i am filing a bug for 16.2, please give me few mins11:58
marios|rucksoniya29|rover: ack thanks11:58
marios|rucksoniya29|rover: what is the bug/do we have it at least 2x? (please don't file if it is only seen 1x)11:58
*** pojadhav is now known as pojadhav|afk11:59
soniya29|rovermarios|ruck, it is consistent failure12:00
marios|ruckthanks soniya29|rover 12:01
ysandeeppojadhav|afk, minor comment: https://code.engineering.redhat.com/gerrit/c/openstack/rrcockpit/+/31557412:06
rlandypojadhav|afk: soniya29|rover: bhagyashris: [rhos-dev] Berlin OpenInfra Summit Self-Nomination Process12:10
rlandysee email12:10
rlandyarxcruz: you're local and approved to apply12:11
rlandypojadhav|afk: soniya29|rover: bhagyashris: everyone else is business need only12:11
rlandypls see https://openinfra.dev/summit-covid/12:12
arxcruzrlandy ack, this means i don't need to fill the form ?12:14
rlandyarxcruz: please fill out the form - explaining that you live local to the area12:15
rlandyinfo I got from management is that they have green-lighted local people12:15
arxcruzrlandy done 12:15
*** ysandeep is now known as ysandeep|afk12:25
rlandymarios|ruck: when chandankumar returns, will add your and his keys to the ci creation script12:26
rlandyso you both can kick it12:26
rlandyrunning script now12:28
marios|ruckrlandy: ack thanks12:28
rlandyI think that is the last thing I exclusively own12:29
rlandyevery other infra piece others should have access to12:29
rlandyysandeep|afk: you are well12:30
rlandywill add your keys to trello create12:30
rlandyyou will all need to create trello tokens12:31
marios|rucksoniya29|rover: o/ let me know if you need something wrt the components (are you still filing the bugzilla?)12:38
rlandymarios|ruck: new cards are on CIX now12:42
marios|ruckthank you rlandy 12:43
*** dviroel is now known as dviroel|brb12:43
rlandydviroel|brb: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-docs/+/834957 - left comments but I think you updated the patch in the mean time12:47
soniya29|rovermarios|ruck, filed the bug, now moving to components :)12:54
marios|ruckok soniya29|rover 12:56
arxcruzrlandy i'm trying to autohold a node, but it's the third time it's cleaned 13:00
rlandyarxcruz: which cloud?13:03
arxcruzrdo 13:03
arxcruzi'm trying to debug the webdownload test failure 13:03
arxcruzhttps://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/testproject/+/3791613:03
rlandyarxcruz: looking13:03
rlandyis the job running now?13:03
arxcruzrlandy finish a few minutes ago, and the node was already cleaned 13:04
arxcruzi'm asking on rhos-ops 13:04
rlandyarxcruz: ok - going to rekick and try hols13:04
rlandyhold13:04
rlandyarxcruz: periodic-tripleo-ci-centos-9-standalone-master13:05
rlandyforce_periodic: true?13:05
rlandycan I add that?13:05
arxcruzrlandy i'll add here, needs that to hold ?13:09
rlandyarxcruz: I added13:09
rlandyno - irrelevant13:09
rlandybut needed to check test13:09
rlandyarxcruz: do you also want a depends-on skiplist revert13:09
rlandybefore we restart job?13:09
arxcruzrlandy no, i'll manually run it 13:11
rlandyok - adding new hold when test starts13:11
rlandyidk if it holds if the test passes13:11
arxcruzreally? it only holds if fails ?13:14
*** ysandeep|afk is now known as ysandeep13:14
marios|ruckarxcruz: yeah we have a var for it like force_fail or something would have to dig for that 13:14
marios|ruckarxcruz: not sure if we can ask for that on the hold request 13:15
* marios|ruck brb13:15
marios|ruckarxcruz: there fyi rlandy https://opendev.org/openstack/tripleo-ci/src/commit/cc3f50ba85cbe02df5ebc4111631d82baea8fe73/playbooks/tripleo-buildimages/run-v3.yaml#L27 13:23
marios|ruckadd it to the zuul job vars in testproject 13:23
arxcruzmarios|ruck ty13:24
marios|ruckarxcruz: ack that one is wrong pointer but right var (for general case that clause ) https://opendev.org/openstack/tripleo-ci/src/commit/cc3f50ba85cbe02df5ebc4111631d82baea8fe73/roles/run-test/templates/toci_quickstart.sh.j2#L18713:27
*** dviroel|brb is now known as dviroel13:27
rlandyarxcruz: try your hold command again once the job starts13:28
rlandyand you see a node shown on the console output13:28
rlandymarios|ruck: https://review.rdoproject.org/zuul/builds?job_name=periodic-tripleo-ci-centos-9-standalone-on-multinode-ipa-master two green runs here?13:35
dviroelrlandy: looking your comments in https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-docs/+/834957 - lets remove everything related to modules here?13:38
marios|ruckrlandy: ack they reported after i filed the bug13:42
marios|ruckrlandy: i'll track and update the bug if we don't see again will close out tomorrow13:43
rlandydviroel: ack13:43
rlandyc8 only13:43
marios|ruckrlandy: we should get master promotion (one of those green was from my https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/testproject/+/41031 )13:44
rlandymarios|ruck++ yay13:44
rlandybhagyashris: hey - why is ysandeep on the rr three times in May?13:53
ysandeepmarios|ruck, rlandy: fyi.. I have added an item on checkpoint agenda(in CI section - we should get out turn early) to discuss c8 wallaby coverage, reading https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-specs/+/834076/1..2/specs/wallaby/mixed-operating-system-versions.rst#b218 looks like James was under impression we will keep wallaby coverage on both cs8 and cs9 , let's see how discussion turns out.13:53
ysandeeprlandy: I requested her, I prefer that way if that's not a problem for anyone.13:53
marios|ruckrlandy: thanks ysandeep 13:53
rlandyysandeep: k - let us know13:54
rlandyI did bring that up - but was shouted down at last meeting13:55
*** dasm|off is now known as dasm13:57
dasmo/13:57
ysandeeprlandy: fyi.. I am getting 1 less turn as upstream ruck/rover in comparison to all, because I have monitored downstream line for first 2 months.13:58
* dasm will join standup after rbac meeting14:00
bhagyashrisakahat, chandankumar rlandy soniya29|rover pojadhav|afk 14:00
bhagyashrismarios|ruck, 14:01
bhagyashrisscrum time14:01
bhagyashrisdasm, ^14:01
*** pojadhav|afk is now known as pojadhav14:02
marios|rucksoniya29|rover: please let me know where you get to before you go so i can have a look regarding components ... should be just 2 to check mainly network wallaby 8 and master compute components were like 11 days old 14:14
rlandyrcastillo; you might also be interested in https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-virtual-baremetal/+/83481314:14
rlandyuefi boot for OVB14:15
soniya29|rovermarios|ruck, sure14:15
marios|ruckrlandy: ysandeep: soniya29|rover: fyi https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/config/+/41041 14:15
marios|ruck(once we get the go-ahead for c8 wallaby teardown today )14:15
ysandeepmarios|ruck: ack14:16
* soniya29|rover brb14:31
dpawlikmarios|ruck, arxcruz: hey, if you have a min, please check https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ci-log-processing/+/83545514:38
marios|ruckdpawlik: k will add to my next reviews 14:40
dpawlikthanks14:40
dpawlikmarios|ruck: this one would be also awesome to review https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ci-log-processing/+/83301114:45
*** amoralej|off is now known as amoralej14:53
marios|ruckrlandy: lets get 5 mins break before next call :)14:54
dasmhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L2zqTYgcpfg14:57
ysandeepmarios|ruck, just confirming will you join checkpoint or production call?15:02
soniya29|rovermarios|ruck, rlandy, do we have some different job name conventions like in openstack-tempest-component we have name as 'periodic-tripleo-ci-centos-8-standalone-full-tempest-scenario-tempest-train' and in criteria file we have https://github.com/rdo-infra/ci-config/blob/master/ci-scripts/dlrnapi_promoter/config_environments/rdo/CentOS-8/train.yaml#L3215:19
soniya29|rovermarios|ruck: rlandy, it is bit confusing me15:19
rlandysoniya29|rover: diff between integration and component lines15:20
rlandyso the 'periodic-tripleo-ci-centos-8-standalone-full-tempest-scenario-tempest-train' job runs in the tempest line15:20
rlandywhile the criteria you are looking at would refer to the integration line15:21
rlandythe component line criteria are in: https://github.com/rdo-infra/ci-config/tree/master/ci-scripts/dlrnapi_promoter/config15:21
marios|rucksoniya29|rover: (what rlandy said :) ) - sorry we are in a call 15:22
*** marios|ruck is now known as marios|ruck|call15:23
soniya29|rovermarios|ruck|call, okay15:23
soniya29|roverrlandy, thanks :)15:23
marios|ruck|callsoniya29|rover: are you filing bugs for the component lines or you think inconsistent issue? 15:34
soniya29|rovermarios|ruck|call, i see full-tempest-scenario train is on tempest tests and is in promotion criteria15:39
soniya29|rovermarios|ruck|call, i am investigating the issue15:39
marios|ruck|callsoniya29|rover: train should be ok per rlandy notes there... so 15:39
marios|ruck|callsoniya29|rover: mainly can you please check network wallaby 8 and master compute components15:39
soniya29|rovermarios|ruck|call, okay15:40
soniya29|rovermarios|ruck|call, i am going first with network wallaby 815:40
marios|ruck|callsoniya29|rover: please see private and let me know before you go what you have done thanks15:42
soniya29|rovermarios|ruck|call, i will let you know15:43
rlandysoniya29|rover: marios|ruck|call:15:44
rlandyperiodic-tripleo-ci-centos-8-standalone-full-tempest-api-network-wallabytestprojectmastercheck39960,1715:45
rlandy2 hrs 19 mins 59 secs2022-03-28 11:53:35SUCCESS15:45
rlandyperiodic-tripleo-ci-centos-8-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001-network-wallabytestprojectmastercheck39960,1715:45
rlandy3 hrs 22 mins 6 secs2022-03-28 11:53:05FAILURE15:45
rlandylast testproject on that15:45
marios|ruck|callsoniya29|rover: i will leave very soon after this call so please update the hackmd with anytihng you have on those components please for handoff to rlandy 15:58
soniya29|rovermarios|ruck|call, sure15:58
marios|ruck|callsoniya29|rover: if you didn't have time to dig into those then you should do it first thing tomorrow but let rlandy know either way before you go please (its very late in pune now?)15:59
rlandymarios|ruck|call: do you want me to look at/do anything?15:59
marios|ruck|callrlandy: no i think we have all the things... info/latest status on the hackmd, otherwise soniya29|rover has been digging at components ^^ 15:59
rlandyok - leaving it16:00
soniya29|rovermarios|ruck|call, thanks for your so kind concern, i know its late in pune, but before i leave for today i will update the hackmd and will properly handoff to rlandy16:02
soniya29|rovermarios|ruck|call, thanks16:02
marios|ruck|callsoniya29|rover: k 16:02
*** marios|ruck|call is now known as marios|ruck16:03
marios|ruckrlandy: off in a minute need sthing ? 16:10
marios|rucksoniya29|rover: ^^16:10
soniya29|rovermarios|ruck, nope16:11
rlandymarios|ruck: no - have a good night16:12
*** dviroel is now known as dviroel|lunch16:13
marios|ruckrlandy: looks like we did get the master c9 promotion16:14
marios|ruckrlandy: will pickup tomorrow then bai 16:14
*** marios|ruck is now known as marios|out16:15
rlandygreat16:16
*** ysandeep is now known as ysandeep|out16:20
ysandeep|outregarding --> I have discussed c8 wallaby coverage in checkpoint call today, the suggestion was to keep one job which really test overcloud (and not only undercloud) as minimum set for c8 wallaby coverage. People on call have suggestion that atleast vanilla standalone job should run for both c8 and c9 for wallaby in check/gate.16:21
ysandeep|outmarios|out, rlandy ^^ lets chat more tomorrow 16:22
marios|outysandeep|out: ack 16:22
* ysandeep|out out for the day16:22
soniya29|roverrlandy, for fs001-network-wallaby the testproject is failing on TestNetworkBasicOps test and latest run fails on overcloud deployment failure16:27
soniya29|roverboth are failing with different failures 16:27
soniya29|roverand is promotion blocker16:27
soniya29|roverrlandy, i think mentioning both the failures in bug can be a good idea16:28
*** jbadiapa is now known as jbadiapa|off16:30
rlandysoniya29|rover: look at the history16:30
rlandyand rerun latest16:31
rlandyto see if it's still an issue when it gets there16:31
rlandybut the bug is worth it at this point16:31
soniya29|roverrlandy, i think we require a bug since it is failing from 2616:32
rlandysoniya29|rover: yes  - go ahead16:32
rlandysoniya29|rover: you can discuss with marios|out in morning16:32
soniya29|roverrlandy, i will rerun the job and also file the bug with both the failures16:32
soniya29|roverrlandy, sure16:32
rlandyok16:32
rlandygreat16:33
soniya29|roverrlandy, https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/196679716:42
rlandythanks - will check after calls16:42
soniya29|roverrlandy, with network wallaby8 other things are good 16:48
rlandygreat16:49
soniya29|roverrlandy, moving to master compute components16:49
*** jpena is now known as jpena|off16:52
*** dviroel|lunch is now known as dviroel16:55
soniya29|roverrlandy, https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/196679917:11
rlandysoniya29|rover: pls make the importnace of those bugs critical17:13
soniya29|roverrlandy, thanks, done17:14
rlandysoniya29|rover: late for you17:19
rlandyyou can pick up the rest tomorrow17:19
soniya29|roverrlandy, not a problem, i will complete the master compute components and after that i will be leaving17:20
soniya29|roverrlandy, cs9 full tempest api is also failing with different failures 1. tempest tests 2. ansible execution failed17:21
soniya29|roveris a promotion blocker as well17:21
rlandysoniya29|rover: only bug if there is a consistent failure17:22
soniya29|roverrlandy, it is failing from 24th march17:23
soniya29|roverrlandy, if we see the latest failures17:23
* rlandy looks17:24
soniya29|roverrlandy, one of them fails over tempest tests and other one fails for ansible execution17:24
soniya29|roverrlandy, https://logserver.rdoproject.org/openstack-component-compute/opendev.org/openstack/tripleo-ci/master/periodic-tripleo-ci-centos-9-standalone-full-tempest-api-compute-master/ec94fe7/logs/undercloud/var/log/tempest/stestr_results.html.gz17:24
rlandysoniya29|rover: ansible exceution of what? deploy17:24
soniya29|roverrlandy, yes17:24
soniya29|roverrlandy, https://logserver.rdoproject.org/openstack-component-compute/opendev.org/openstack/tripleo-ci/master/periodic-tripleo-ci-centos-9-standalone-full-tempest-api-compute-master/9ad9150/logs/undercloud/home/zuul/standalone_deploy.log.txt.gz17:26
rlandyI am looking through all the failures - sec'17:26
rlandy22-03-28 08:02:20,386 58701 INFO tripleo_common.image.image_uploader [  ] Non-2xx: id 21bb289a5d2c5578fa4bef7305af3d2834b00261, status 404, reason Not Found, text {"errors":[{"code":"MANIFEST_UNKNOWN","message":"manifest unknown","detail":{"Tag":"c16775607f2619e1086d495b6ddb8612"}}]}17:27
rlandylatest error is an infra hitch17:27
rlandy2022-03-28 04:02:20.522409 | fa163ed2-2176-a182-cbdb-000000001504 |      FATAL | Container image prepare | undercloud | error={"changed": false, "error": "Not found image: https://trunk.registry.rdoproject.org/v2/tripleomastercentos9/openstack-cinder-volume/manifests/c16775607f2619e1086d495b6ddb8612",17:28
rlandyyou can ignore that one17:28
soniya29|roverit is promotion blocker17:29
rlandy2022-03-26 04:32:54.009817 | fa163eaf-0c9b-4f6e-e97b-000000001504 |      FATAL | Container image prepare | undercloud | error={"changed": false, "error": "Modifying image 192.168.24.1:8787/tripleomastercentos9/openstack-cinder-volume:c16775607f2619e1086d495b6ddb8612 failed", "msg": "Error running container image prepare: Modifying image 192.168.24.1:8787/tripleomastercentos9/openstack-cinder-volume:c16775607f2619e1086d495b6ddb861217:30
rlandy failed", "params": {}, "success": false}17:30
rlandy^6 error I see twice17:30
rlandybut it's different from latest17:30
rlandysoniya29|rover: I would rerun here 17:30
rlandyto see what the real problem is17:30
rlandyyou'll need more debug17:30
rlandyotherwise the bug will send people in the wring direction17:31
soniya29|roverrlandy, tommorrow morning i will have look over it to see if we have consistent failures and will have more time to debug as well17:34
soniya29|roverrlandy, i have made a note of it17:34
rlandysoniya29|rover: sounds good17:36
rlandyhave a good night17:36
soniya29|roverrlandy, same thing is with cs9 standalone compute master17:42
soniya29|roverrlandy, its confusing17:42
soniya29|roverits also a promotion blocker17:42
soniya29|roverrlandy, these are all the issues with master compute17:44
*** amoralej is now known as amoralej|off17:51
soniya29|roverrlandy, should we sync?17:52
rlandyyou can add them to the same bug17:52
rlandyif it's the same issue17:52
rlandysoniya29|rover: yep - and component line blockers are promotion blockers17:53
rlandysoniya29|rover: putting in a testproject to rerun periodic-tripleo-ci-centos-8-scenario007-standalone-ussuri17:55
rlandyso ussuri can promote17:55
soniya29|roverrlandy: okay, i will add them to the bug17:56
soniya29|roverrlandy, i have commented on the bug here:- https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/196679717:59
soniya29|roverrlandy, leaving for the day18:00
soniya29|roveranything else you want me to look?18:01
rlandysoniya29|rover: that's all thanks18:06
rlandyhave a good night18:06
soniya29|roverrlandy, thanks18:07
soniya29|roverrlandy, :)18:07
rlandydasm: vexxhost is looking better now18:24
rlandymaster promoted18:25
rlandyso you can try ovb there18:25
dasmack, thanks18:29
*** dviroel is now known as dviroel|out20:30
rcastillorlandy: couple centosci c8 wallaby issues I saw. May be related to my changes in quickstart. I'll see if I can reproduce in my env21:58
rlandyrcastillo: just in the job or did we hose something else?22:00
rcastillojust these jobs afaict22:00
rlandyok - good22:23
*** rlandy is now known as rlandy|out22:55

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!