*** dviroel|out is now known as dviroel | 00:20 | |
rcastillo|rover | dviroel: sc010 victoria running here https://sf.hosted.upshift.rdu2.redhat.com/zuul/t/tripleo-ci-internal/status/change/403445,1 | 00:22 |
---|---|---|
dviroel | great, thanks | 00:23 |
dviroel | missing kvm and fs035 only | 00:23 |
* dviroel fingers crossed | 00:23 | |
dviroel | rcastillo|rover: downstream still failing on NTP - https://sf.hosted.upshift.rdu2.redhat.com/logs/30/403430/1/check/periodic-tripleo-ci-rhel-9-ovb-1ctlr_2comp-featureset020-internal-rhos-17/236fab8/logs/undercloud/home/zuul/overcloud_deploy.log.txt.gz | 00:25 |
dviroel | :( | 00:25 |
dviroel | rcastillo|rover: tox-molecule failing on gates again, https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?job_name=tripleo-tox-molecule&project=openstack/tripleo-ci | 00:29 |
dviroel | mirros issues, we may need to improve that test | 00:29 |
rcastillo|rover | dviroel: I'll look into making that better | 00:31 |
dviroel | rcastillo|rover: pls, send the rhos-dev email to raise downstream cix - affecting almost all ovs jobs | 00:31 |
dviroel | if you have time | 00:31 |
dviroel | rcastillo|rover: i need to go out, time to take the kid to bed - ttyl | 00:31 |
dviroel | rcastillo|rover: have a good night | 00:32 |
dviroel | o/ | 00:32 |
rcastillo|rover | alright dviroel, ttyl o/ | 00:32 |
*** dviroel is now known as dviroel|out | 00:32 | |
*** pojadhav|out is now known as pojadhav|ruck | 02:08 | |
*** pojadhav is now known as pojadhav|ruck | 04:36 | |
chandankumar | ysandeep|out: hello, Do you know who maintains the downstream ntp server? It broke the ovb jobs during overcloud deploy | 05:07 |
chandankumar | for rhos16 and rhos17 | 05:08 |
*** ysandeep|out is now known as ysandeep | 05:10 | |
ysandeep | chandankumar: I am not sure who manages them, worth a ticket to helpdesk or check in internal ops channel. | 05:28 |
chandankumar | pojadhav|ruck: ^^ | 05:28 |
ysandeep | chandankumar: Have we check manually if its really issue with ntp servers.. | 05:28 |
ysandeep | chandankumar, https://sf.hosted.upshift.rdu2.redhat.com/logs/70/310670/23/check/periodic-tripleo-ci-rhel-9-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001-internal-rhos-17/7c51c8a/logs/undercloud/home/zuul/overcloud-deploy.sh.txt.gz | 05:29 |
ysandeep | we have mentioned 3 ntp servers here.. all of them affected? | 05:29 |
chandankumar | ysandeep: as per the buildset https://sf.hosted.upshift.rdu2.redhat.com/zuul/t/tripleo-ci-internal/buildset/1c2d1929acf44101814ac4431a8cf7aa | 05:30 |
chandankumar | jobs failed at same issue | 05:30 |
chandankumar | we are re-running those failed jobs to confirm | 05:30 |
ysandeep | I think worth to hold a node for debug, may be they are unreachable from our jobs. | 05:30 |
chandankumar | then will file a ticket | 05:30 |
ysandeep | chandankumar, in above buildset ^^ baremetal job can sync with ntp | 05:32 |
ysandeep | https://sf.hosted.upshift.rdu2.redhat.com/logs/4d/4daed1b14c582b442f64ec45b1ddba5b58e03986/openstack-periodic-integration-rhos-17-rhel9/periodic-tripleo-ci-rhel-9-bm_envB-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001-rhos-17/0fa536f/logs/overcloud-controller-0/var/log/extra/chrony.txt | 05:32 |
ysandeep | may be network issue between psi and rh netwoek | 05:32 |
chandankumar | ysandeep: yes might be | 05:33 |
chandankumar | ysandeep: thanks for pointing the bm logs | 05:33 |
chandankumar | i didnot checked that job | 05:33 |
ysandeep | chandankumar, undercloud in ovb job can also sync with ntp: https://sf.hosted.upshift.rdu2.redhat.com/logs/70/310670/23/check/periodic-tripleo-ci-rhel-9-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001-internal-rhos-17/7c51c8a/logs/undercloud/var/log/extra/chrony.txt.gz | 05:35 |
ysandeep | don't seems like issue with ntp server.. | 05:35 |
ysandeep | pojadhav|ruck, If you have a node on hold, I can help to debug it | 05:36 |
marios | morning folks | 05:36 |
pojadhav|ruck | ysandeep, I havent made node on hold.. posting testpatch for failed jobs | 05:36 |
chandankumar | ysandeep: yes seems to be a network issue, standalone jobs also passed | 05:37 |
ysandeep | pojadhav|ruck, ack.. please also add "remove_ovb_after_job: false" in vars | 05:38 |
ysandeep | i will disable the old stack cleanup script | 05:38 |
* ysandeep disabled old stack cleanup script in internal | 05:39 | |
pojadhav|ruck | ysandeep, sure | 05:41 |
ysandeep | marios, >> ysandeep|out: o/ fyi when you get a chance https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-jobs/+/41831/7#message-ef962cc7aafb377a786c37e30d004ec5e52ea5e2 we should discuss in planning - ack, will add a discussion point in planning mtg | 05:43 |
marios | ysandeep: thank you | 05:49 |
*** pojadhav|ruck is now known as pojadhav|brb | 06:07 | |
*** pojadhav|brb is now known as pojadhav|ruck | 06:25 | |
*** pojadhav|ruck is now known as pojadhav|dr_appt | 06:30 | |
* pojadhav|dr_appt will be back in half hr | 06:30 | |
*** amoralej|off is now known as amoralej | 06:48 | |
*** jpena|off is now known as jpena | 07:01 | |
*** pojadhav|dr_appt is now known as pojadhav|ruck | 07:02 | |
ysandeep | chandankumar, pojadhav|ruck something wrong with overcloud networking: http://pastebin.test.redhat.com/1045943 | 07:27 |
chandankumar | yes | 07:48 |
chandankumar | ysandeep: clock.redhat.com is not resolving | 07:48 |
chandankumar | ysandeep: may be we can ask someone from DF or networking to take alook | 07:49 |
marios | ysandeep: thanks for review - fyi https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ci/+/838502/2#message-c956bd8fd03cc2764cce76d51a75f9057984c0c4 | 07:49 |
marios | chandankumar: ERROR: The certificate of ‘clock.redhat.com’ was signed using an insecure algorithm. | 07:50 |
marios | The certificate's owner does not match hostname ‘clock.redhat.com’ | 07:50 |
marios | chandankumar: (via wget clock.redhat.com) | 07:50 |
marios | chandankumar: fwiw - does it help? | 07:50 |
marios | wtf is this https://clock.redhat.com/home.php | 07:51 |
marios | (open in browser) ? | 07:51 |
marios | chandankumar: ysandeep: ^^ | 07:51 |
chandankumar | endrun tecnologies | 07:52 |
marios | is that the time server UI? but anyway seems to be cert issue | 07:52 |
marios | chandankumar: cant we switch to a different time server while that is resolved? | 07:52 |
chandankumar | marios: in downstream ovb deployment from overcloud ntp server ip is not resolving pastebin.test.redhat.com/1045943 | 07:52 |
marios | chandankumar: i see.. so something wrong in that environment specifically you mean | 07:53 |
chandankumar | marios: yes, as sandeep said something wrong with overcloud networking | 07:53 |
marios | chandankumar: yeah ping works here | 07:53 |
marios | chandankumar: i mean ping clock.redhat.com | 07:54 |
ysandeep | marios, chandankumar unable to ping dns server from overcloud node as well.. incase you want to look as well: ssh Vt9tVSAudRJb8TgvLgbrSAFYm@nyc1.tmate.io | 07:54 |
marios | ysandeep: thanks | 07:55 |
marios | ysandeep: is it all jobs one job or where? | 08:01 |
ysandeep | marios, all ovb jobs in downstream | 08:01 |
marios | ysandeep: both 16 and 17 you mean? | 08:03 |
ysandeep | marios, yes both 16.2 and 17 jobs are failing | 08:03 |
marios | :/ | 08:03 |
marios | ysandeep: so don't think it was something in tripleo-heat-templates for example then | 08:03 |
marios | ysandeep: i see only the request but no replies in tcpdump | 08:04 |
ysandeep | yeah, may be some network issue in psi | 08:04 |
marios | ysandeep: did we already ping rhos-ops about that | 08:08 |
chandankumar | not yet, we thought the issue is with the deployment | 08:09 |
ysandeep | not yet, I am trying to confirm that this is really a network issue | 08:09 |
marios | chandankumar: don't think so i mean ... it would have to merge both into wallaby and train yesterday and get into d/stream pipeline for 16/17 | 08:10 |
marios | chandankumar: could hppen but don't think it is likely? | 08:10 |
marios | ysandeep: yeah i understand the hesitation... its a bit weird that it resolves from undercloud but not controller... :/ | 08:11 |
marios | but that it woul dhit both 16 and 17 is equally weird | 08:11 |
marios | (at same time i mean) | 08:11 |
marios | unless it is something in our tooling/quickstart/extras i.e. merged to master and affect both | 08:12 |
ysandeep | may be issue is only when we create a new network.. undercloud uses existing private network.. in ovb job we create a new network. | 08:12 |
* ysandeep create a vm with new network to confirm that theory | 08:13 | |
* ysandeep need to go for lunch first. | 08:14 | |
ysandeep | marios, chandankumar i am killing tmate(stepping away from laptop for few mins for lunch), if you need env access - I can share the details. | 08:15 |
chandankumar | ysandeep: ok | 08:15 |
marios | ysandeep: thanks | 08:15 |
chandankumar | marios: ysandeep except this https://opendev.org/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/commit/aec2975826699c9ebb65b919dabeedfed2e22589 nothing landed | 08:15 |
chandankumar | which looks suspecious | 08:15 |
marios | chandankumar: yes i was just looking at that tone | 08:15 |
ysandeep | i have shared env details in a pm, incase you want to check anything | 08:16 |
marios | chandankumar: there is quite a bit of it that isn't wired up yet though https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:masquerade-ansible | 08:16 |
marios | chandankumar: was trying to work out if it could be related agree is suspicious but not sure yet ;) | 08:16 |
marios | chandankumar: # Override masquerading, OVB need's to masquerade the External (10.0.0.0/24) net as well. | 08:17 |
chandankumar | marios: can we do a revert and try out? | 08:17 |
marios | hmmm | 08:17 |
ysandeep | chandankumar, may be we can create a revert(with -W) and run a testproject | 08:17 |
marios | (comment in there | 08:17 |
marios | chandankumar: yeah i think it is worth it ;) | 08:17 |
chandankumar | on it | 08:17 |
marios | chandankumar: you doing or should i? | 08:17 |
marios | chandankumar: ack thanks | 08:17 |
ysandeep | pojadhav|ruck, could you please check https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1969583 reported by rabi on #tripleo | 08:22 |
*** ysandeep is now known as ysandeep|lunch | 08:23 | |
chandankumar | ysandeep|lunch: marios pojadhav|ruck https://code.engineering.redhat.com/gerrit/c/testproject/+/403504 | 08:23 |
marios | thanks chandankumar | 08:26 |
marios | going afk for a few mins quick errand | 08:26 |
*** marios is now known as marios|afk | 08:26 | |
pojadhav|ruck | ysandeep|lunch, ack will check | 08:37 |
*** pojadhav|ruck is now known as pojadhav|lunch | 08:37 | |
*** marios|afk is now known as marios | 08:53 | |
*** ysandeep|lunch is now known as ysandeep | 08:55 | |
amoralej | chandankumar, marios i just tested https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart/+/837723 | 09:35 |
amoralej | with https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdoinfo/+/42038 | 09:36 |
amoralej | issue in 007 is unrelated, may i get reviews on it and get it merged if possible? | 09:36 |
reviewbot | Do you want me to add your patch to the Review list? Please type something like add to review list <your_patch> so that I can understand. Thanks. | 09:36 |
marios | amoralej: looking | 09:43 |
*** pojadhav|lunch is now known as pojadhav|ruck | 09:49 | |
marios | chandankumar: amoralej: one note/hesitation - if you're in a rush i can workflow - please check, and if you want to update i can revote | 10:00 |
amoralej | marios, yep, i'm in rush, it'd be great if i could get it merged assap | 10:00 |
marios | ack done amoralej | 10:01 |
marios | amoralej: they wont ever be consumer jobs the conditional is unnecessary | 10:01 |
amoralej | what would prevent us of creating consumer jobs? | 10:06 |
marios | chandankumar: please add to your queue https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ci/+/838502 when you next have time for that kind of thing ;) | 10:08 |
marios | chandankumar: damn undercloud install failed @ https://sf.hosted.upshift.rdu2.redhat.com/zuul/t/tripleo-ci-internal/stream/584783c7d5294e7493091f3862edef93?logfile=console.log | 10:11 |
marios | chandankumar: maybe the 16 one will get further lets see | 10:12 |
chandankumar | marios: failed at overcloud node provision | 10:12 |
chandankumar | marios: https://sf.hosted.upshift.rdu2.redhat.com/zuul/t/tripleo-ci-internal/stream/8eba5dcb421a4e01933527a50d9d2dff?logfile=console.log | 10:12 |
chandankumar | overcloud deploy is going on | 10:12 |
chandankumar | marios: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ci/+/838502/2#message-84f52c0174690866614e8c51710eb0bb9185deae | 10:19 |
chandankumar | marios: Do we want to remove newton part in a seperate review? | 10:20 |
ysandeep | chandankumar, marios hey o/ downstream ovb job passed the earlier failing step with the revert: http://pastebin.test.redhat.com/1046004 | 10:25 |
chandankumar | ysandeep: rhel-8 one na | 10:26 |
chandankumar | ? | 10:26 |
ysandeep | chandankumar, yes rhel-8/16.2 | 10:26 |
ysandeep | chandankumar, 17 failed with other issues | 10:26 |
chandankumar | node provision | 10:26 |
chandankumar | will wait for pooja testproject to finish | 10:27 |
chandankumar | will triger RHEL-9 fs01 one more time | 10:27 |
marios | chandankumar: yes i will update for that thanks | 10:30 |
marios | ysandeep: great so at least we have a resolution... lets merge the revert did you ping tengu yet? | 10:30 |
ysandeep | marios, job just passed that step, I will speak with Tengu now - if he wants to take a look at affected environment. | 10:31 |
marios | ysandeep: well i think we should revert anyway and then fix | 10:32 |
marios | ysandeep: ... unless can be fixed by this afternoon anyway | 10:33 |
marios | imo its always better to fix if you aren't under pressure but up to Tengu i guess | 10:33 |
ysandeep | original patch had a depends-on, I wonder we are seeing this because tripleo-ansible patch haven't reached downstream | 10:33 |
marios | ysandeep: there are a couple of unmerged patches still | 10:35 |
marios | ysandeep: https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:masquerade-ansible | 10:36 |
chandankumar | non-ci patches are proposed for master | 10:36 |
ysandeep | chandankumar, pojadhav|ruck are are not seeing same issue in wallaby/victoria/ussuri/train right? | 10:37 |
ysandeep | we* are | 10:37 |
chandankumar | I am checking right now | 10:38 |
ysandeep | chandankumar, pojadhav|ruck https://logserver.rdoproject.org/openstack-periodic-integration-stable4/opendev.org/openstack/tripleo-ci/master/periodic-tripleo-ci-centos-8-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001-train/3f53f8b/logs/undercloud/home/zuul/overcloud_deploy.log.txt.gz | 10:40 |
ysandeep | same issue in periodic jobs | 10:40 |
ysandeep | thanks god, its not only downstream :) that would have complicated things | 10:40 |
ysandeep | downstream bug confused me, I thought we are only seeing this in downstream. | 10:41 |
chandankumar | master last run failed at mirror issue | 10:43 |
chandankumar | ysandeep: yes all release affected https://logserver.rdoproject.org/openstack-periodic-integration-stable1/opendev.org/openstack/tripleo-ci/master/periodic-tripleo-ci-centos-9-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001-wallaby/e1db585/logs/undercloud/home/zuul/overcloud_deploy.log.txt.gz | 10:44 |
chandankumar | opening a lp bug | 10:45 |
chandankumar | ysandeep: marios https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/+/838547 let's merge it | 10:45 |
chandankumar | or we want more testing | 10:45 |
chandankumar | on rdo side? | 10:45 |
ysandeep | oops... we ignored rdo votes: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/+/836951/6#message-206b8ca5168a2d20082333b6a0d8d8d644557464 | 10:46 |
ysandeep | it failed in check itself.. | 10:46 |
ysandeep | Sometimes I wish rdo third party can block patches. | 10:47 |
pojadhav|ruck | ysandeep, chandankumar : do we need bug for upstream jobs or BZ is sufficient for ntp server issue..? | 10:50 |
marios | chandankumar: ack voted | 10:50 |
chandankumar | pojadhav|ruck: need a upstream bug | 10:50 |
chandankumar | above two logs is sufficient | 10:50 |
chandankumar | please file one | 10:51 |
pojadhav|ruck | chandankumar, sure | 10:51 |
ysandeep | I am also discussing on #rhos-df in internal channel | 10:51 |
chandankumar | ysandeep: ok | 10:51 |
marios | chandankumar: ysandeep: (FYI updated https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ci/+/838502 per chandankumar comments on newton please revisit when you next have time thank you) | 10:51 |
marios | chandankumar: i have not touched tripleo.sh (for newton) as discussed earlier with ysandeep in the review, we will post followup to remove that completely | 10:52 |
chandankumar | marios: ok | 10:52 |
ysandeep | marios, chandankumar Tengu injured his arm yesterday and will be out for a few days recovering | 10:53 |
chandankumar | ouch | 10:53 |
chandankumar | Tengu: hope you get better soon :-) | 10:54 |
marios | oh o/ get well soon Tengu | 10:54 |
marios | Tengu: you can code by voice typing? what could possibly go wrong | 10:54 |
chandankumar | soniya29: kopecmartin arxcruz tempest meeting is colliding with company meeting? Want to cancel it? | 10:56 |
arxcruz | chandankumar up to you guys | 10:58 |
ysandeep | chandankumar, marios are we building packages in third party rdo jobs correctly | 11:01 |
ysandeep | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/+/836951/6#message-206b8ca5168a2d20082333b6a0d8d8d644557464 - patchset 6 | 11:01 |
ysandeep | https://logserver.rdoproject.org/51/836951/6/openstack-check/tripleo-ci-centos-9-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001/448784c/logs/undercloud/var/log/extra/package-list-installed.txt.gz | 11:01 |
ysandeep | tripleo-ansible.noarch 4.1.1-0.20220408083838.61b4080.el9 @delorean-current | 11:01 |
ysandeep | patch had a depends-on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/+/836951/6//COMMIT_MSG | 11:01 |
ysandeep | but i don't see tripleo-ansible rpm building in job | 11:02 |
chandankumar | construct zuul deps list but don't cache it so it can be reprepared during upgrades | 11:04 |
chandankumar | does not contains have tripleo-ansibel change | 11:04 |
chandankumar | ysandeep: can you file a bug | 11:10 |
ysandeep | chandankumar: yes | 11:12 |
ysandeep | checking if it only happens in rdo third party or in check as well | 11:12 |
chandankumar | ysandeep: https://logserver.rdoproject.org/51/836951/6/openstack-check/tripleo-ci-centos-9-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001/448784c/zuul-info/inventory.yaml | 11:13 |
chandankumar | and compare it with https://storage.gra.cloud.ovh.net/v1/AUTH_dcaab5e32b234d56b626f72581e3644c/zuul_opendev_logs_aec/836872/9/check/tripleo-ci-centos-9-content-provider/aec7a75/zuul-info/inventory.yaml | 11:13 |
chandankumar | in RDO inventory there is no mention of change_url | 11:14 |
chandankumar | build-test-packages is working fine i think | 11:14 |
chandankumar | that info is missing from RDO zuul that's why there is no info | 11:14 |
*** abregman__ is now known as abregman | 11:16 | |
chandankumar | ysandeep: akahat bhagyashris review call if want to join | 11:16 |
ysandeep | chandankumar, joining | 11:16 |
marios | review time if you want to joiuni | 11:16 |
*** dviroel|out is now known as dviroel | 11:23 | |
chandankumar | jpodivin: conversation https://meetings.opendev.org/irclogs/%23tripleo/%23tripleo.2022-04-14.log.html#t2022-04-14T11:27:03 | 11:24 |
chandankumar | failed job: https://34e9586208b3d2d1b836-40001c60cc2cc6a7bddcc7547f0d5486.ssl.cf2.rackcdn.com/837825/1/check/tripleo-ci-centos-9-standalone/5100f29/job-output.txt | 11:24 |
soniya29 | chandankumar, sure | 11:28 |
jpodivin | chandankumar: I see | 11:28 |
jpodivin | chandankumar: thanks. Yeah there does seem to be an easy way to fix this. Funnily enough it's something we are already doing in QE when testing our 17 regressions. | 11:30 |
dviroel | oh, victoria promoted, yey | 11:31 |
chandankumar | dviroel: \o | 11:33 |
soniya29 | chandankumar, arxcruz,kopecmartin, i am cancelling today's meeting since it is collinding with company meeting | 11:33 |
chandankumar | dviroel: rcastillo|rover pojadhav|ruck https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1969613 for freeipa scenarios | 11:34 |
chandankumar | not yet added promotion blocker | 11:34 |
arxcruz | soniya29 okay | 11:34 |
chandankumar | soniya29: thanks! | 11:34 |
chandankumar | rcastillo|rover: dviroel: all ovb got impacted due to ntp | 11:34 |
chandankumar | fix is https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/+/838547 | 11:34 |
chandankumar | clear it from upstream to downstream | 11:35 |
dviroel | chandankumar: ack, following on cix | 11:35 |
dviroel | chandankumar: sad, missing just osp17-rhel9 to have everything green :( | 11:36 |
dviroel | almost there | 11:36 |
ysandeep | chandankumar, pojadhav|ruck we already have one cix for ovb issue.. i think we can remove promotion blocker from here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1969611 otherwise we will create a dup cix | 11:38 |
chandankumar | ysandeep: good call, done | 11:39 |
chandankumar | linking the bug back to prod chain | 11:39 |
ysandeep | thanks! | 11:39 |
chandankumar | pojadhav|ruck: dviroel: card updated for ovb | 11:41 |
dviroel | ++ | 11:41 |
chandankumar | pojadhav|ruck: all set for program call | 11:42 |
chandankumar | ? | 11:42 |
pojadhav|ruck | chandankumar, yes | 11:43 |
pojadhav|ruck | ysandeep, sure | 11:43 |
chandankumar | ysandeep: https://trello.com/c/MFE54n8b/2466-cixbz2076756osp17rhel9rhel9-osp17-ovb-jobs-failing-overcloud-deployment-at-ntp-sync-stage for this one Do we want to change DFG to DF? | 11:44 |
chandankumar | and change RCA also | 11:44 |
chandankumar | ? | 11:44 |
pojadhav|ruck | ysandeep, chandankumar already removed | 11:44 |
*** amoralej is now known as amoralej|lunch | 12:06 | |
*** chem is now known as Guest2419 | 12:18 | |
jgilaber | Hi, is there anyone here that can give W+1 to this patch: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-heat-templates/+/836954 | 12:21 |
jgilaber | It got a +2 already | 12:22 |
ysandeep | jgilaber: marios here have core on tht, but I think its better if you ping on #tripleo - there are other cores there as well. | 12:26 |
marios | jgilaber: ysandeep: i workflowed it | 12:26 |
jgilaber | thanks! | 12:27 |
ysandeep | marios++ | 12:27 |
marios | np :) I just clicked a button ;) | 12:27 |
marios | jgilaber: yeah for future reference #tripleo is the right place not here | 12:29 |
jgilaber | got it, thanks again! | 12:30 |
ysandeep | chandankumar, on further looking about the depends-on issue... I think dlrn didn't build tripleo-ansible rpm in job because tripleo-ansible patch was already merged.. looks okay. | 12:34 |
ysandeep | chandankumar, https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/+/836951/6#message-206b8ca5168a2d20082333b6a0d8d8d644557464 - 11th april run , tripleo-ansible patch already merged on 08th April https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ansible/+/836871 | 12:35 |
chandankumar | ysandeep: thanks for checking in. :-) | 12:35 |
*** ysandeep is now known as ysandeep|afk | 12:45 | |
rcastillo|rover | o/ | 13:03 |
*** amoralej|lunch is now known as amoralej | 13:06 | |
*** ysandeep|afk is now known as ysandeep | 13:08 | |
dviroel | rcastillo|rover: hi o/ | 13:16 |
dviroel | rcastillo|rover: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/+/838547 revert to fix NTP issue | 13:16 |
rcastillo|rover | yeah I saw | 13:16 |
rcastillo|rover | any other issues currently? | 13:16 |
rcastillo|rover | victoria promoted | 13:16 |
dviroel | yeah | 13:17 |
rcastillo|rover | that's nice | 13:17 |
dviroel | we just need to make tripleo bits reach downstream | 13:17 |
dviroel | to try again | 13:17 |
rcastillo|rover | yeah | 13:17 |
chandankumar | rcastillo|rover: dviroel I have asked pojadhav|ruck to rekick the rhos17 rhel9 line | 13:18 |
chandankumar | and drop others | 13:18 |
chandankumar | please do not post testproject for the same | 13:18 |
rcastillo|rover | chandankumar: ack | 13:18 |
dviroel | chandankumar: oh true, it is a quickstart-extras revert, so we don't need to promote anything to have the fix there | 13:20 |
pojadhav|ruck | chandankumar, rcastillo|rover, dviroel : we will monitor this for osp17 rhel9 https://sf.hosted.upshift.rdu2.redhat.com/zuul/t/tripleo-ci-internal/status#276230 | 14:03 |
*** dasm|off is now known as dasm | 14:03 | |
pojadhav|ruck | rest jobs are green in latest buildset | 14:03 |
dasm | o/ | 14:03 |
chandankumar | aye | 14:03 |
dasm | ysandeep: o/ question wrt ruck rover script. Do you want to have 1-to-1 representation for prints: before and after changes? | 14:04 |
dasm | > "component, status and last promotion" in one line - it was looking better, imho... | 14:05 |
chandankumar | rcastillo|rover: dviroel leave notes on hackmd | 14:08 |
chandankumar | see ya! | 14:08 |
dviroel | chandankumar: see ya p/ | 14:09 |
dviroel | rcastillo|rover: when free, pls check how old are components, and try to rerun the lagging ones | 14:16 |
pojadhav|ruck | dviroel, rcastillo|rover : please leave notes for us, will picked up tomorrow morning.. only osp17 rhel9 is left to promote. lets watch this : https://sf.hosted.upshift.rdu2.redhat.com/zuul/t/tripleo-ci-internal/status#276230 | 14:16 |
pojadhav|ruck | hope it will promote | 14:16 |
dviroel | pojadhav|ruck: ack, will add notes/comments below April 20th, ok? | 14:17 |
pojadhav|ruck | I will also check all upstream/downstream component lines status tomorrow. | 14:17 |
dasm | ysandeep: btw, i just checked rr schedule. you're scheduled 3 weeks, one after another, starting May 9. Are you aware of that? cc bhagyashris | 14:17 |
dviroel | pojadhav|ruck: tks | 14:17 |
pojadhav|ruck | dviroel, ack | 14:17 |
pojadhav|ruck | rcastillo|rover, dviroel, leaving for the day.... see you tomorrow o/ | 14:17 |
dviroel | dasm: i think that ysandeep is adept to 3w RR | 14:17 |
dviroel | pojadhav|ruck: have a good nigjt | 14:18 |
pojadhav|ruck | dviroel, :) | 14:18 |
dasm | dviroel: if he asked for that that's fine. Just checking :) | 14:18 |
dviroel | dasm: yep, not sure either | 14:21 |
ysandeep | dasm: sry was in a mtg, yes i asked for continuous rr weeks.. I like older format more | 14:22 |
dasm | ysandeep: ack, ack. | 14:22 |
dasm | ysandeep: my overarching plan is to update the code to the level of: i want to have this working old way, let's use this tmeplate. | 14:24 |
dasm | ysandeep: but i feel your pain with changing output. i'm gonna address that in a minute | 14:24 |
dasm | and i'll keep in mind backward compat wrt presentation | 14:24 |
ysandeep | dasm: >> Do you want to have 1-to-1 representation for prints - we can change but having "component, status and last promotion" in one line was more compact. my -1 was more for not having an extra line when running --component all. | 14:26 |
ysandeep | dasm++ thanks for great improvement in rr script | 14:26 |
ysandeep | dasm, may be we can also introduce concurrency/parrelism to make rr script run faster.. | 14:27 |
*** ysandeep is now known as ysandeep|out | 14:30 | |
ysandeep|out | dasm, will review your new patch in my morning o/ see you tomorrow | 14:31 |
dasm | ysandeep|out: \o | 14:32 |
* ysandeep|out out for the day | 14:32 | |
* dviroel lunch | 15:31 | |
*** dviroel is now known as dviroel|lunch | 15:31 | |
*** dviroel|lunch is now known as dviroel | 16:31 | |
*** amoralej is now known as amoralej|off | 16:35 | |
rcastillo|rover | dviroel: are we aware of this tempest failure in network component? https://review.rdoproject.org/zuul/builds?job_name=periodic-tripleo-ci-centos-9-standalone-full-tempest-api-network-master | 16:45 |
rcastillo|rover | didn't see cix or launchpad on it | 16:45 |
dviroel | rcastillo|rover: not aware about, pls open a LP bug | 16:51 |
*** jpena is now known as jpena|off | 17:13 | |
dviroel | rcastillo|rover: success, osp17 rhel9 should promote soon | 18:07 |
rcastillo|rover | dviroel: \o/ | 18:15 |
dviroel | [DIR]current-tripleo/2022-04-20 14:23 | 18:31 |
dviroel | \o/ | 18:32 |
dviroel | rcastillo|rover: when you have new bug, please add to https://hackmd.io/kPLwaUsGQieevaU10lIf_A | 18:33 |
rcastillo|rover | dviroel: sure | 18:43 |
rcastillo|rover | need to step out for a few hours, I'll be back to check on some component job results | 20:28 |
* dasm => offline | 20:52 | |
dasm | o/ | 20:52 |
*** dasm is now known as dasm|off | 20:53 | |
*** dviroel is now known as dviroel|out | 22:27 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!