Tuesday, 2022-11-22

*** rlandy|rover|biab is now known as rlandy|rover00:33
*** rlandy|rover is now known as rlandy|out01:08
*** mkatari is now known as mkatari_02:29
pojadhavrlandy|out, Tengu, ack 02:57
*** yadnesh|away is now known as yadnesh04:03
*** ysandeep|out is now known as ysandeep04:49
*** ysandeep is now known as ysandeep|ruck04:49
*** pojadhav- is now known as pojadhav05:03
*** pojadhav- is now known as pojadhav05:57
marioso/06:05
ysandeepgood morning o/06:08
ysandeep__folks o/ fyi.. my irc is bouncing today maybe network issue06:52
*** ysandeep__ is now known as ysandeep|ruck06:53
mariosakahat: o/ morning let's catch up on the rdo decomission a bit this morning?06:59
mariosakahat: sent invite please check inbox07:27
mariosakahat: do you already have a patch for https://opendev.org/openstack/tripleo-quickstart/src/commit/0b7f925d24a4dcbc1957f1ccba7e01967c19bd87/config/release/tripleo-ci/CentOS-9/promotion-testing-hash-wallaby.yml#L7 ? 07:42
akahatmarios, o/ accepted invite. 07:52
* bhagyashris lunch07:53
mariosakahat: \o/07:54
mariosysandeep|ruck: ack 08:52 < ysandeep__> folks o/ fyi.. my irc is bouncing today maybe network issue07:55
* pojadhav is also facing issues to join internal redhat channels.07:56
* pojadhav lunch07:56
*** yadnesh is now known as yadnesh|afk08:20
*** jpena|off is now known as jpena08:22
*** amoralej|off is now known as amoralej08:26
akahatmarios, ceph containers are not in the quay.rdoproject.org, may be we need to add it https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/+/865241/comments/babdd5ca_b99f0d4208:27
akahatand rhel too!08:28
mariosakahat: no lets not add anything more to quay.rdoproject.org we are decommissioning that 08:34
mariosakahat: we can talk in a bit08:34
akahatquay.rdoproject.org ?08:35
mariosysandeep|ruck: fyi 08:35
mariosysandeep|ruck: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart/+/864690 08:35
mariosysandeep|ruck: going to merge https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart/+/864690/6#message-63d1318d8a6073cb30828500c5b6e425139caa9708:36
ysandeep|ruckmerge it, I already read your comment08:36
mariosysandeep|ruck: ack :)08:36
ysandeep|ruck:D 08:36
*** ysandeep|ruck is now known as ysandeep|ruck|brb08:37
*** yadnesh|afk is now known as yadnesh08:51
*** jpena is now known as jpena|off08:56
*** jpena|off is now known as jpena08:57
jm1o/09:23
*** ysandeep|ruck|brb is now known as ysandeep|ruck09:24
mariosrlandy|out: ysandeep: dviroel|afk: bhagyashris: please add to your reviews https://code.engineering.redhat.com/gerrit/c/openstack/tripleo-ci-internal-jobs/+/435848 https://code.engineering.redhat.com/gerrit/c/openstack/tripleo-ci-internal-config/+/435847 10:11
bhagyashrisack10:19
jm1frenzy_friday: nginx patch works as expected, verified in staging env :) https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ci-config/+/4615910:28
jm1frenzy_friday: incockpit now also works in staging env :D http://10.0.11.177/d/p2lXRDO4k/rhel9-rhos17-full-component-pipeline?orgId=110:29
frenzy_fridayjm1, sorry one more comment on the patch :D (It loogs good to me and works, but still got a question :D)10:32
jm1frenzy_friday: answered ;)10:34
mariosrlandy|out: please add to your review list https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-jobs/+/46119 (depends-on are ready but blocked until we are good to go with 46119)10:35
frenzy_fridayjm1, thanks!10:35
mariosfood biab10:38
*** ysandeep|ruck is now known as ysandeep|ruck|brb10:53
jpodivinI've been thinking about the jammy update to our nodes. 11:06
jpodivinHow many of openstack projects are compatible with python 3.10 ? 11:08
jpodivinBecause that's on what the unit tests will run now.11:09
*** ysandeep|ruck|brb is now known as ysandeep|ruck11:09
jpodivinIt's backwards compatible yes ... but won't we expose ourselves to unknowingly introducing new features into code base?11:11
*** dviroel|afk is now known as dviroel11:20
*** rlandy|out is now known as rlandy|rover11:23
rlandy|rovermarios: hi - will look in a bit11:24
rlandy|roverysandeep|ruck: hello - reviewing hackmd11:24
frenzy_fridaymarios, rlandy|rover, hey, good morning. Pls add to your review lists when you get some time: https://code.engineering.redhat.com/gerrit/c/openstack/sf-config/+/435898 (nodeset label 9.1) - I am not sure if this is correct11:25
rlandy|roverfrenzy_friday; sure - will look after chat with security folks11:26
frenzy_fridaythanks11:26
rlandy|roverysandeep|ruck: may be worth promoting one master hash at this point11:28
ysandeep|ruckrlandy|rover, I already pinged on #sec-interops twice since morning:)11:28
rlandy|roverysandeep|ruck: there was a hash from sunday where fs064 failed11:28
rlandy|roverwe have seen that one pass since11:29
rlandy|rovermaybe that is the best hash11:29
rlandy|roverI can't get fs039 past overcloud deploy11:29
rlandy|roverchandankumar: hi - welcome back11:29
ysandeep|ruckrlandy|rover, want to meet?11:30
rlandy|roverysandeep|ruck: sure 11:31
ysandeep|ruckmeet.google.com/rip-zjhs-okd11:31
ysandeep|ruckrlandy|rover, ^^11:32
rlandy|roverysandeep|ruck: sec  - just leaving ads the info he requested11:32
ysandeep|rucksure11:32
marioswill do frenzy_friday 11:37
*** dviroel_ is now known as dviroel11:38
jm1frenzy_friday: any idea who submitted this change? https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ci-config/+/4604711:47
frenzy_fridayjm1, It was kkula. I am not surwe from which team but I can see the username on rhos-ops11:49
frenzy_fridayThey wanted to set up a puppets dashboard. This was another related patch: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ci-config/+/45919 (probably because there was missing data)11:50
jm1frenzy_friday: is he here on our chat?11:51
frenzy_fridaynope11:51
jm1frenzy_friday: she/he should better join :D11:52
jm1marios, rlandy|rover, dasm|off: to be picked up in one of the next sprints https://issues.redhat.com/browse/TRIPLEOCI-131912:07
mariosjm1: thanks12:08
*** dviroel_ is now known as dviroel12:16
* akahat afk12:17
ysandeep|ruckrlandy|rover, marios https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ci-config/+/46167 fs064 skip for master promotion.12:21
rlandy|roverysandeep|ruck: thanks -  merging  - wil revert12:25
rlandy|rovermarios: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-jobs/+/46119 - left comment there12:27
rlandy|roveridk that we want to run one job a line in ibm cloud12:28
rlandy|roverrather keep the line together in vexx - just my $0.0212:28
jpodivinrlandy|rover: I know it's not related to what you are dealing with atm. But I really feel like I need to ask about the Jammy situation. 12:36
mariosrlandy|rover: thanks I had a look and replied... not just one job all of those 8 jobs have ibmcloud nodeset i just carried what we currently do. we can update but is there an advantage to haveing it all on vexx?12:37
jpodivinfor now it's fine when we are running unit tests and such on python3.10 but is it going to be fine in the future?12:37
rlandy|rovermarios: ibm cloud 2 i sgoing away12:37
mariosrlandy|rover: yup that's a reason ;)12:37
mariosrlandy|rover: k lets update12:37
rlandy|rovermarios: and 3 is not ready12:37
rlandy|roverso you don;t want to block you change on this12:37
mariosso you mean we'll need new nodesets for the ibm3 cloud node?12:37
rlandy|roverbesides it's easier for debug on one cloud12:37
*** amoralej is now known as amoralej|lunch12:38
rlandy|rovermarios: yep - dviroel has them in patches12:38
mariosrlandy|rover: otherwise that isn't an issue... but then i'm confused are you saying ultimately we can run them as is with ibmcloud nodeset for the 8 jobs?12:38
rlandy|roverbut I would be against splitting lines12:38
rlandy|roverwhy not run on vexx?12:38
mariosk 12:38
dviroelrlandy|rover: marios: nodesets merged already12:38
marioswell we started running in ibmcloud to ease the burden on vexx right and stability issues at the time (I guess this one isn't an issue any more?)12:38
mariosrlandy|rover: but anyway for now will remove since it will be affected by ibm2 nodesets going away 12:40
rlandy|rovermarios: mostly the load12:40
rlandy|roverbut one job is neither here nor there12:41
mariosysandeep: rlandy|rover: bhagyashris: dviroel: please revisit in your own time https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-jobs/+/46119/5#message-5c6878cb894a89db0ad55886b5f86f6e71bbfab212:43
dviroelrlandy|rover: so, the issue with bmc node:12:50
dviroel[   84.931437] os-net-config[7915]: [2022/11/22 12:45:09 PM] [ERROR] stdout: ERROR     : [/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifup-eth] Error, some other host (FA:16:3E:93:63:91) already uses address 10.0.1.234.12:50
dviroelanother instance is getting the same ip, don't know why yet12:51
rlandy|roverdviroel: are there stray nodes left?12:51
dviroelno, from same stack creation, always12:52
rlandy|rovercan you tell what host has that address?12:52
arxcruzhey guys, i'm not feeling well, i'll be a little bit away, i think i got flu from my daugther 12:53
ysandeep|ruckarxcruz, take care!12:55
rlandy|roverarxcruz: feel better!12:55
dviroelrlandy|rover: in a previous run, was one of the overcloud nodes12:57
dviroelnode 012:57
rlandy|roveris it always?12:58
rlandy|roverthe only time we saw that error before was with nodes left over12:58
rlandy|rovernot the same node in a stack getting the same ip 12:59
rlandy|roverdpawlik: hi - you around?12:59
ysandeep|ruckrlandy|rover, I think dpawlik is on 2 weeks pto13:00
rlandy|roverdviroel: so those nodes are created in one shot by the stack13:01
rlandy|roverdviroel: can you share the logs?13:01
rlandy|rovermarios: revoted - thanks for update13:04
dviroelrlandy|rover: http://pastebin.test.redhat.com/108230413:04
ysandeep|ruckmarios, +wed13:04
rlandy|rovermeeting  - will look in a few13:04
*** ysandeep|ruck is now known as ysandeep|ruck|afk13:07
mariosysandeep|ruck|afk: thanks i'll go unblock the depends-on 13:09
mariosrlandy|rover: ysandeep|ruck|afk: please that first https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ci-config/+/46148/1#message-766404b5b02ab9cacd78cd50f3a05ff8f5fc7f84 when you next have a minue NOT fire thanks13:10
mariosbhagyashris: please sanity check? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart/+/864726 13:11
bhagyashrismarios, ack13:13
rlandy|roverysandeep|ruck|afk: woohoo - zed should promote13:37
jm1pojadhav, marios, rlandy|rover: i might be late for ci community call due to mtg conflict, but dasm|off has all the info as well 13:49
pojadhavjm1, ack13:49
rlandy|roverjm1; Cedric is coming and we need to chat bout DNS13:51
rlandy|roverso that will happen first13:51
jm1rlandy|rover: oh wow i just had a look at todays topics, thats a lot to discuss :D13:52
*** ysandeep|ruck|afk is now known as ysandeep|ruck13:53
ysandeep|ruckrlandy|rover, yeah looks like one of my rerun passed :) ipa-deploy failure seems intermittent13:53
mariosjm1: ack 13:54
*** dasm|off is now known as dasm13:55
dasmo/13:55
rlandy|roverysandeep|ruck: think we missed the fs064 hash13:55
rlandy|roverhttp://promoter.rdoproject.org/promoter_logs/centos9_master.log13:55
rlandy|rovermissing jobs all include fs03913:55
ysandeep|ruckdon't we check last 50 hashes?13:56
ysandeep|ruckI find it hard to believe that the hash we are tracking is older than last 50 hashes 13:57
rlandy|roverysandeep|ruck: 16 hashes per agg hash13:58
ysandeep|ruckohh, I thought we check last 50 agg hashes.. but looks like that is not the case13:59
rlandy|roverysandeep|ruck: we can move it to 100 hashes13:59
ysandeep|ruckthat seems reasonable considering the fact that master is 1 week behind now14:01
mariosysandeep|ruck: dviroel: you joining podified sync?14:01
ysandeep|ruckmarios, yes i will14:01
ysandeep|ruckrlandy|rover, https://review.rdoproject.org/zuul/status#3942014:06
ysandeep|ruckwallaby will promote soon, in tempest14:07
ysandeep|ruckrlandy|rover, what does it take to increase the promoter hashes to 100?14:07
* ysandeep|ruck looking at promoter code14:07
rlandy|roverysandeep|ruck: it is 100 ... https://github.com/rdo-infra/ci-config/blob/0569d3ac182d583341ccca296f759ff817df839c/ci-scripts/dlrnapi_promoter/config_environments/rdo/CentOS-9/master.yaml#L1314:08
rlandy|roverweird14:08
rlandy|roverhttp://promoter.rdoproject.org/promoter_logs/centos9_master.log14:09
rlandy|roverysandeep|ruck: so we either revert the fs064 or accept fs03914:09
rlandy|roverI am working on suppl node increase14:09
ysandeep|ruckCan we increase that number to 200?14:10
ysandeep|ruckor promote this particular hash manually14:11
ysandeep|ruckthe hash we want https://trunk.rdoproject.org/centos9-master/tripleo-ci-testing/1d/8e/1d8e37b0de13dabf2789047ad17e4cea/ - just 4 days old14:11
dasmmarios: o/ can we talk about upgrades/updates for zed? I see your comments wrt patches. I'm not sure what I'm missing there.14:16
mariosdasm: in call right now... missing undercloud-upgrade job?14:19
dasmmarios: we can type. this? https://opendev.org/openstack/tripleo-ci/src/branch/master/zuul.d/upgrades-jobs-templates.yaml#L5714:22
dasmok, i see it missing. i thought i added it here: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ci/+/865050/2/zuul.d/periodic.yaml14:23
mariosdasm: yeah... we discussed 'minor update and undercloud-upgrade' your patch is adding the minor update14:23
dasmok. 3rd time is a charm?14:23
rlandy|roverysandeep|ruck: increase to 20014:26
rlandy|roverrather than manual promo14:26
rlandy|roverI am working on ade's suggestion of a larger node14:26
ysandeep|ruckrlandy|rover, ack, let me push a patch.14:26
ysandeep|ruckhttps://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ci-config/+/46172 is up14:29
ysandeep|ruckbhagyashris, ^^ fyi..14:30
bhagyashrisack14:30
ysandeep|ruckbhagyashris, I hope its fine with promoter to increase latest_hashes_count temporarily from 100 to 20014:30
*** amoralej|lunch is now known as amoralej14:38
bhagyashrisysandeep|ruck, hope so. but will need to revert once promotion will done14:40
rcastillorlandy|rover: ack on the 1-1 resched14:41
*** frenzy_friday is now known as frenzy_friday|doc14:43
ysandeep|ruckrlandy|rover, https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ci-config/+/46172 is up and currently waiting for zuul14:45
ysandeep|ruckerrr, rate limit again.. https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ci-config/+/4617214:45
dasmmarios: i pushed an update. lmk if that's what you're looking for: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ci/+/86505014:48
mariosdasm: ack will revisit thanks14:49
dasmk, thx14:50
pojadhavCommunity call in 8 mins : arxcruz, rlandy|rover , marios, ysandeep|ruck , bhagyashris, svyas, soniya29, pojadhav, akahat, chandankumar, frenzy_friday, anbanerj,  dviroel, rcastillo, dasm, jm114:52
pojadhavPlease add your agenda if any : https://hackmd.io/MMg4WDbYSqOQUhU2Kj8zNg14:53
ysandeep|ruckrlandy|rover, community call15:01
*** pojadhav is now known as pojadhav|afk15:32
Tengu:)15:32
ysandeep|ruckTengu++ thanks!15:32
Tenguysandeep|ruck: fixing unbound/networkmanager: where would that take place? I'd say it should take place in the configure-unbound role directly, but in tripleo case, it's probably in tripleo-ci and/or oooq-extras?15:33
Tengu(though, imho, we should on the contrary go for dnsmasq instead, even if we "just" need to disable unbound.service, install dnsmasq, and configure networkmanager)15:33
ysandeep|ruckimho, Ideally I would say in configure-unbound role they should make sure they configure NM knows that it should not touch resolv.conf15:33
TenguI'm surprised it's not done actually..15:34
Tenguprobably overlooked.15:34
Tenguhmmm.... where's that role defined actually?15:35
ysandeep|ruckTengu, fetching15:35
ysandeep|ruckTengu, https://opendev.org/opendev/base-jobs/src/branch/master/roles/configure-unbound/tasks/main.yaml#L215:35
Tenguhttps://opendev.org/opendev/base-jobs/src/branch/master/roles/configure-unbound/tasks  ahh15:35
Tengufun....15:37
Tenguso the forwarders are actually passed over by zuul.15:37
Tenguroles/configure-unbound/README.rst:.. zuul:rolevar:: unbound_primary_nameserver_v415:37
Tenguand the defaults are...15:38
Tengurlandy|rover: actually, unbound doesn't take the instance provider DNS as forwarder.15:38
Tenguit's taking, by default, googld and cloudflare.15:38
Tenguysandeep|ruck: -^15:38
Tenguso it's "wrong" imho. it should take the one configured by the DHCP server :).15:39
Tenguwasn't vexxhost creating issues with external DNS servers ?15:39
ysandeep|ruckTengu, we only have unbound running on upstream images/jobs.. rdo images(vexx) don't have unbound installed15:41
Tenguysandeep|ruck: hmm ok. I'm pretty sure I've seen issues related to that though.15:41
ysandeep|ruckbut +1 that it should use instance provider DNS as forwarder15:42
Tenguysandeep|ruck: so using instance provider DNS is... well, we can't get it just like that, if we're decoupling from networkmanager ^^15:42
Tenguand this is why the configure-unbound role pushes google/cloudflare by default :).15:43
Tengubecause it can't do otherwise.15:43
Tenguor, at least, not easily.15:43
ysandeep|ruckahh, okay15:44
Tengu~> this is why I'd really, really go the dnsmasq path directly.15:44
Tenguysandeep|ruck: I can propose a quick oooq-extras + tripleo-ci patch for that if you want.15:44
Tengujust "an example" of how to handle it, while disabling unbound.15:45
ysandeep|ruckTengu, thanks that will help15:45
ysandeep|ruckyes, we can disable unbound/ configure dnsmasq in tripleo-ci pre-playbooks level but ideally it should go in base/pre-playbooks and dib but we can do that as a follow-up.15:47
* jm1 bbl15:50
Tenguof course.15:50
ysandeep|ruckTengu, Its getting late for me but we can talk tomorrow. We need something similiar to https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ci/+/865290 and add that pre-playbook in pre-run15:50
Tenguysandeep|ruck: sure - I'm going to the all-hand, and maybe will push a WIP against tripleo-ci15:51
ysandeep|ruckack.. just use https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ci/+/865290/3/zuul.d/layout.yaml#12 pre-run: instead of run: , I will also replace that soon after some tests15:52
ysandeep|ruckTengu, thanks, I will catch up with you tomorrow's morning15:52
Tengu++15:52
ysandeep|ruckrlandy|rover, https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ci-config/+/46172 ci reports back, If you want to try increase latest_hashes_count to 20015:53
rlandy|roverysandeep|ruck: looking15:54
rlandy|roverlet's try it15:54
ysandeep|ruckthanks!15:55
rlandy|roverTengu: sorry - revolving meetings ... will read back in a few15:59
Tengurlandy|rover: np - I'm also doing 10 things in // :)15:59
ysandeep|ruckfolks o/ All hands mtg time if you are around.16:02
Tenguysandeep|ruck: something like that? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ci/+/86530516:04
ysandeep|ruckTengu, yes that will do for a test16:05
Tengu:)16:05
Tengutook me.... 5 minutes16:05
*** yadnesh is now known as yadnesh|away16:12
*** dviroel is now known as dviroel|lunch16:19
* dasm => afk, doc's appt16:23
dasmrlandy|rover: dviroel|lunch rcastillo i might be offline during review meeting.16:23
*** dasm is now known as dasm|off16:23
rlandy|roverhmmm ... ysandeep|ruck: 200 hashes didn;t take16:38
rlandy|roverhttp://promoter.rdoproject.org/promoter_logs/centos9_master.log16:38
ysandeep|ruckrlandy|rover, I wonder if promoter have pulled the latest content before the above ^^ run for master16:39
rlandy|roverysandeep|ruck: we can wait another 10 mins16:40
rlandy|roverto see if the merge happened in time16:40
ysandeep|ruckmerged happened in time16:43
ysandeep|ruck-rw-r--r--. 1 promoter promoter 3434 Nov 22 16:17 master.yaml16:43
Tengurlandy|rover: do you want to track the dnsmasq thing in some launchpad or other means?16:43
ysandeep|ruckhttp://promoter.rdoproject.org/promoter_logs/centos9_master.log - 2022-11-22 16:35:04,846 717250 INFO     promoter Validation Successful 16:43
ysandeep|rucklooks like master.yaml was changed 18 mins before promoter kicked for master16:44
rlandy|roverTengu: maybe JIRA card?16:52
rlandy|roverdepending on how much work it is16:52
Tengurlandy|rover: maybe? though it's "upstream"... as for work, the patch I proposed may do the trick - at least partially.16:52
ysandeep|ruckrlandy|rover, latest run also didn't take the increase in hash in account16:53
ysandeep|ruckhttp://promoter.rdoproject.org/promoter_logs/centos9_master.log16:53
Tengurlandy|rover: I'll sync tomorrow with ysandeep|ruck - we should get a clearer vision of the task.16:53
rlandy|roverTengu: ysandeep|ruck: sounds good16:53
rlandy|roverlet's scope it tomorrow16:53
rlandy|roverysandeep|ruck: alternative is to accept fs039 failure16:54
rlandy|roverwhich maybe a bigger problem16:54
ysandeep|ruckI have proposed reverts: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ci-config/+/45892 and https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ci-config/+/4589116:54
ysandeep|ruckrevert 45892 goes first16:54
rlandy|roverysandeep|ruck: I have the test patch running with the increased extra node16:55
rlandy|roverthere is a hash missing fs039 and fs06416:55
ysandeep|ruckyes if ^^ works, we probably wont need the skips16:56
rlandy|roveridk if it will fix the  overcloud deployment failure16:56
ysandeep|ruckrlandy|rover, we don't run fs039 in internal?16:57
rlandy|roverdidn't merge that yet16:57
rlandy|roverI can try it16:57
ysandeep|ruckI suspect the deployment failures are just vexx resource crunch issues16:58
ysandeep|ruckso internal pass would be great16:58
rlandy|roverkicking16:59
ysandeep|ruckTengu, https://storage.bhs.cloud.ovh.net/v1/AUTH_dcaab5e32b234d56b626f72581e3644c/zuul_opendev_logs_ba0/865290/5/check/tripleo-ci-centos-9-content-provider/ba02d9d/job-output.txt16:59
*** marios is now known as marios|out17:00
*** dviroel|lunch is now known as dviroel17:00
ysandeep|ruckunbound works with my test17:00
dviroeldasm|off 0 x 0 rcastillo17:00
ysandeep|ruckfirst dif take 20ms , second take 0ms - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ci/+/865290/5/playbooks/tripleo-ci/test.yml#4817:00
ysandeep|ruckdig*17:00
Tenguysandeep|ruck: 'k - though it will use google + cloudflare servers17:01
Tengufun - my job is stuck at "configure-swap: Copy old /opt" task.17:01
Tengunot sure what it's supposed to do at this point.17:01
ysandeep|ruckyes.. but if it caches it won't have to go to google + cloudflare servers everytime 17:01
ysandeep|ruckTengu, yes my job stuck on that task too for long.. didn't get chance to look what causing the delay17:02
Tenguysandeep|ruck: it's more about resources that may be only on the provider's DNS17:02
Tengutrying to find where's that task defined.17:02
ysandeep|ruckrlandy|rover, I am out now.. please merge the reverts when you get a chance: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ci-config/+/45892 and https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ci-config/+/4589117:03
rlandy|roverwill do17:03
Tenguysandeep|ruck: see you tomorrow!17:03
* Tengu is out as well17:03
TenguI'll check my dnsmasq switch tomorrow.17:03
ysandeep|ruckrlandy|rover, Tengu see you tomorrow o/17:04
rlandy|roverhave a goo dnight17:04
*** ysandeep|ruck is now known as ysandeep|out17:04
rlandy|roverlunch - brb17:07
*** jpena is now known as jpena|off17:33
*** frenzy_friday|doc is now known as frenzy_friday17:36
*** amoralej is now known as amoralej|off18:08
* dviroel coffee19:31
* jm1 out for today20:10
*** dasm|off is now known as dasm20:31
dasmdviroel: ?20:31
dviroeldasm: poland 0 x 0 mexico20:32
dviroel:)20:32
dasmah. i'm not into football :)20:33
dviroeli know :)20:33
dasm:)20:35
* dviroel going afk20:37
*** dviroel is now known as dviroel|afk20:37
dasmdviroel|afk: o/20:38
rlandy|roverlol21:13
* dasm => offline22:25
dasmo/22:25
*** dasm is now known as dasm|off22:25
*** rlandy|rover is now known as rlandy|out23:09

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!