| *** yadnesh|away is now known as yadnesh | 04:27 | |
| * pojadhav stepping out for hospital will be back in 1-2 hrs | 04:50 | |
| marios | o/ | 06:39 |
|---|---|---|
| *** Tengu_ is now known as Tengu | 07:01 | |
| ysandeep | marios, \o | 07:02 |
| Tengu | chkumar|ruck: heya! quick question about the EDPM job: apparently we're running the deploy from within the remote (subnode1) node? I'm wondering why, especially since this may break any patch test against, for instance, tripleo-ansible.. | 07:03 |
| *** amoralej|off is now known as amoralej | 07:15 | |
| chkumar|ruck | Tengu: yes, we are running the playbook with in the remote system | 07:27 |
| chkumar|ruck | so that compute services gets deployed on that node | 07:28 |
| chkumar|ruck | I am not getting "this may break any patch this may break any patch " | 07:28 |
| chkumar|ruck | on that node, we run build-test-package so changes gets applied and installed on second node | 07:29 |
| akahat | chkumar|ruck, please review when you are free, thanks! https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/config/+/46180 | 07:34 |
| Tengu | chkumar|ruck: https://opendev.org/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/src/branch/master/roles/external-data-plane-management/tasks/compute_services_on_target_host.yml#L12-L20 | 07:34 |
| Tengu | chkumar|ruck: this is installed on the subnode1, then used during the deploy. afaik, those packages and their dependencies come from the standard repositories, not some local builds.. ? | 07:35 |
| Tengu | While it seems to mention "builds depends-on", I don't see such task... ? | 07:36 |
| chkumar|ruck | Tengu: https://opendev.org/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/src/branch/master/playbooks/deploy-standalone-compute.yml#L34 | 07:40 |
| chkumar|ruck | https://opendev.org/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/src/branch/master/roles/external-data-plane-management/tasks/main.yml#L8 | 07:40 |
| chkumar|ruck | and https://opendev.org/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/src/branch/master/roles/external-data-plane-management/tasks/prepare_node.yml#L11 | 07:40 |
| chkumar|ruck | which calls build test packages | 07:40 |
| Tengu | chkumar|ruck: hmm. still - why can't we run the deploy from the undercloud itself, with a small tweak of the inventory? | 07:41 |
| Tengu | that would probably be easier/better imho | 07:41 |
| chkumar|ruck | Tengu: that we can do that | 07:41 |
| chkumar|ruck | Tengu: subnode private keys are also kept /etc/nodepool/id_rsa | 07:42 |
| chkumar|ruck | if need we can use that directly | 07:42 |
| Tengu | chkumar|ruck: I'll try to have a look. So, as I understand things, the job is deploying standalone on the so-called "undercloud", and then deploys the compute via edpm on the remote? | 07:42 |
| chkumar|ruck | Tengu: yes | 07:42 |
| chkumar|ruck | correct | 07:42 |
| chkumar|ruck | do you need a testproject to deug that | 07:43 |
| chkumar|ruck | ? | 07:43 |
| Tengu | ok. I think I get it. Lemme do some more tests with the current open patch I have, refactoring will make things a bit easier as-is | 07:43 |
| Tengu | chkumar|ruck: I have 2 things in parallel: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ansible/+/863146 (my main task) and https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/+/866864 | 07:43 |
| Tengu | the tripleo-ansible one depends-on oooq-extras patch | 07:43 |
| Tengu | so I kind of have my testproject via the tripleo-ansible patch | 07:44 |
| chkumar|ruck | I will take a look at those patches | 07:45 |
| Tengu | chkumar|ruck: I'm also trying to copy some of the files that are edited in oooq-extras role to a location we gather in the logs - that will also help understanding the whole thing. | 07:45 |
| Tengu | chkumar|ruck: the tripleo-ansible one is mostly firewall related - the oooq-extras is the part you'll get interest in imho :) | 07:45 |
| chkumar|ruck | Tengu: When I was trying to design the job initially most of things were not clear, so I wired like that | 07:46 |
| Tengu | sorry for jumping so late in that train - had some other things to care before shifting to EDPM and its CI job... | 07:46 |
| Tengu | chkumar|ruck: np - things aren't set in stone, they can evolve :). And we're here for that | 07:46 |
| Tengu | it's already good to get a job :) | 07:46 |
| Tengu | now that a thing is working, let's iterate and improve. | 07:46 |
| chkumar|ruck | Tengu: thank you for improving it :-) | 07:46 |
| chkumar|ruck | Tengu: I also got the edpm pieces on podified side sorted | 07:47 |
| chkumar|ruck | I will write a doc and share it with you :-) | 07:47 |
| Tengu | oh, great! | 07:47 |
| Tengu | we'll get to work closer on that ;). | 07:47 |
| chkumar|ruck | just need to fix os net config issue | 07:47 |
| chkumar|ruck | Tengu: https://paste.opendev.org/raw/b29A2yyQIDetWcOmpYsR/ will give the clue what I am doing there | 07:48 |
| Tengu | I'll check that out over the week. I really want to get the other 2 patches in | 07:49 |
| Tengu | chkumar|ruck: so. proposal: I replace "subnode-1" by "undercloud", so that all is prepared on the undercloud. Then, I tweak the inventory passed to the ansible-playbook launched in the script so that it points to the subnode-1 | 07:58 |
| chkumar|ruck | Tengu: yup | 07:58 |
| Tengu | I let the current run finish, and will propose that change shortly. I'll edit my current oooq-extras patch, it's still a (heavier) refactoring. | 07:58 |
| Tengu | so basically, we'll run 3 playbooks against the undercloud (standalone, edpm, validate_edpm) | 07:59 |
| chkumar|ruck | yes | 07:59 |
| marios | chkumar|ruck: akahat: ok to go with https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/config/+/46180 ? (we waiting for something?) | 08:15 |
| chkumar|ruck | marios: looks good, approving that | 08:18 |
| Tengu | chkumar|ruck: in fact, that modification should make the run a bit faster: all of the prepare-node would be launched only once afaik. | 08:23 |
| Tengu | which is great :). | 08:23 |
| akahat | chkumar|ruck, marios thanks! | 08:26 |
| Tengu | chkumar|ruck: also, I think I have a way to manipulate the inventory, using some slurp + plain dict edition. Let's see. | 08:30 |
| *** ysandeep is now known as ysandeep|lunch | 08:30 | |
| *** jpena|off is now known as jpena | 08:38 | |
| chkumar|ruck | marios: hello | 09:33 |
| chkumar|ruck | marios: periodic-tripleo-ci-rhel-9-8-multinode-mixed-os-rhos-17.1 job runs in both rhos17-1 rhel-8 and rhos17-1 rhel-9 line | 09:33 |
| chkumar|ruck | ? | 09:33 |
| marios | chkumar|ruck: only in rhel9 line | 09:34 |
| marios | chkumar|ruck: testing both 8 and 9 tripleo-ci-testing | 09:34 |
| chkumar|ruck | marios: yes, correct | 09:36 |
| chkumar|ruck | but this job is in RHOS-17-1 rhel-8 promotion criteria file | 09:36 |
| marios | chkumar|ruck: yes that's fine. that job reports to dlrn 2x (see job-output.txt) first for dlrn9 & 9hash then for 8 | 09:37 |
| chkumar|ruck | as also in rhos-17-1 rhel-9 promotion | 09:37 |
| marios | chkumar|ruck: so we promote 8 based on that result | 09:37 |
| chkumar|ruck | https://sf.hosted.upshift.rdu2.redhat.com/zuul/t/tripleo-ci-internal/builds?job_name=periodic-tripleo-ci-rhel-9-8-multinode-mixed-os-rhos-17.1&skip=0 | 09:38 |
| chkumar|ruck | is timed_out when it runs in periodic line | 09:38 |
| chkumar|ruck | and timeout in check | 09:38 |
| marios | is it broken? | 09:38 |
| marios | looking | 09:38 |
| marios | very slow logs | 09:38 |
| chkumar|ruck | yes downstream is very very slow | 09:39 |
| marios | tempest timeout chkumar|ruck ? | 09:39 |
| marios | chkumar|ruck: i mean, looking at the last run from periodic line 3 hrs 11 mins 12 secs2022-12-13 13:24:04TIMED_OUT | 09:39 |
| marios | https://sf.hosted.upshift.rdu2.redhat.com/logs/openstack-periodic-integration-rhos-17.1-rhel9/opendev.org/openstack/tripleo-ci/master/periodic-tripleo-ci-rhel-9-8-multinode-mixed-os-rhos-17.1/20bda92/job-output.txt | 09:39 |
| chkumar|ruck | yes that one is from tempest | 09:39 |
| marios | chkumar|ruck: times out from tempest | 09:39 |
| marios | chkumar|ruck: ok... so we can't chase the hash for that job like that | 09:40 |
| marios | chkumar|ruck: ah actually its ok cos its the 9 hash ... we cant override the 8 hash (without some more work to add it) | 09:41 |
| chkumar|ruck | https://sf.hosted.upshift.rdu2.redhat.com/zuul/t/tripleo-ci-internal/build/9e6fb927dd9642fcb44129226d5aa48b | 09:41 |
| chkumar|ruck | 2022-12-12 got timeout at overcloud deploy | 09:41 |
| marios | chkumar|ruck: looking (waiting for logs to load) | 09:42 |
| chkumar|ruck | marios: ah ok, so check jobs which failed at 52 mins 56 secs post failure https://sf.hosted.upshift.rdu2.redhat.com/zuul/t/tripleo-ci-internal/build/a89263c50456404d92179887c5435c0c due to missing containers as that hash does not exist for 8 I think | 09:43 |
| marios | chkumar|ruck: yeah i am writing a comment | 09:48 |
| marios | chkumar|ruck: we can't do it, even for the 9 hash in fact | 09:49 |
| marios | chkumar|ruck: cos it breaks reporting (the deploy error is unrelated i think) | 09:49 |
| chkumar|ruck | marios: so we need to run this job in periodic without hash? just use force_periodic | 09:49 |
| chkumar|ruck | in the check job definition of test project | 09:50 |
| marios | chkumar|ruck: https://code.engineering.redhat.com/gerrit/c/testproject/+/425376/14#message-caae509c2d3335baf627dc657c8965e51faf6a10 | 09:53 |
| marios | chkumar|ruck: yeah just force_periodic without overriding hash | 09:53 |
| marios | chkumar|ruck: it will use the latest tripleo-ci-testing for 9/8 | 09:53 |
| marios | chkumar|ruck: i'll add task for mixed rhel story to explore adding this ability | 09:54 |
| chkumar|ruck | marios: thank you for beautifully explaining via comments | 09:58 |
| chkumar|ruck | got it, I will try it with force_periodic | 09:58 |
| marios | chkumar|ruck: thx sorry about that | 10:04 |
| marios | chkumar|ruck: (fyi https://issues.redhat.com/browse/TRIPLEOCI-1339) | 10:05 |
| *** ysandeep|lunch is now known as ysandeep | 10:05 | |
| chkumar|ruck | marios: thank you for adding the story :-) | 10:05 |
| marios | needs reviews please oooq https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-jobs/+/46398 | 10:41 |
| reviewbot | Do you want me to add your patch to the Review list? Please type something like add to review list <your_patch> so that I can understand. Thanks. | 10:41 |
| marios | and related https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ci/+/867351 | 10:42 |
| marios | thank you | 10:42 |
| ysandeep | marios, looking | 10:59 |
| marios | thanks | 11:02 |
| *** yadnesh is now known as yadnesh|afk | 11:04 | |
| ysandeep | Anyone noticed changes in upstream gerrit ui? | 11:12 |
| *** dviroel|out is now known as dviroel|rover | 11:12 | |
| chkumar|ruck | yup | 11:12 |
| chkumar|ruck | it looks nice :-) | 11:12 |
| *** rlandy|out is now known as rlandy | 11:12 | |
| chkumar|ruck | dviroel|rover: rlandy pub key please | 11:12 |
| chkumar|ruck | dviroel|rover: rlandy good morning o/ | 11:13 |
| rlandy | chkumar|ruck: https://github.com/rlandy.keys | 11:13 |
| rlandy | chkumar|ruck: dviroel|rover: hello - you all set with program call? | 11:14 |
| chkumar|ruck | rlandy: status added in the doc | 11:14 |
| dviroel|rover | o/ | 11:14 |
| ysandeep | \o | 11:14 |
| ysandeep | review time | 11:16 |
| dviroel|rover | chkumar|ruck: morning, looking at program call doc | 11:18 |
| chkumar|ruck | dviroel|rover: ok | 11:19 |
| chkumar|ruck | dviroel|rover: https://github.com/viroel.keys is the correct pub key ? | 11:19 |
| dviroel|rover | chkumar|ruck: status there wasn't update? | 11:19 |
| dviroel|rover | chkumar|ruck: yes sir | 11:19 |
| chkumar|ruck | dviroel|rover: https://docs.engineering.redhat.com/display/PRODCHAIN/2022-12-12+Meeting+Notes | 11:20 |
| dviroel|rover | chkumar|ruck: ah ok, I was looking in the google docs | 11:23 |
| chkumar|ruck | dviroel|rover: rlandy stepping out for an hour | 11:23 |
| dviroel|rover | ack | 11:26 |
| Tengu | chkumar|ruck: pushed an update to https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/+/866864 - there are "some" more changes in it now :). | 11:28 |
| Tengu | it's being tested right now against the tripleo-ansible change. | 11:28 |
| rlandy | chkumar|ruck: dviroel|rover: thanks program call doc looks good | 11:35 |
| dviroel|rover | rlandy: chkumar|ruck: this is still confusing, since program call doc was always the GDoc for mee. But now we create the meeting notes there and someone updates the GDoc (probably mburns) | 11:42 |
| *** yadnesh|afk is now known as yadnesh | 11:42 | |
| rlandy | dviroel|rover: correct | 11:43 |
| rlandy | we report as a the prod chain together | 11:43 |
| dviroel|rover | rlandy: got it | 11:45 |
| *** ysandeep is now known as ysandeep|brb | 11:51 | |
| dviroel|rover | marios: hi - I think we are ok to revert criteria here https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ci-config/+/46221 | 11:53 |
| chkumar|ruck | rlandy: dviroel|rover I am back now, we can sync | 11:56 |
| dviroel|rover | chkumar|ruck: added you in hive channel, on slack | 12:00 |
| rlandy | chkumar|ruck: ack | 12:00 |
| rlandy | chkumar|ruck: dviroel|rover: https://meet.google.com/eyf-demy-sdn?pli=1&authuser=0 | 12:01 |
| marios | dviroel|rover: yes looking/doing | 12:02 |
| bhagyashris | rlandy, marios chkumar|ruck ysandeep|brb kinfly add into review list https://code.engineering.redhat.com/gerrit/c/openstack/tripleo-ci-internal-config/+/437628 | 12:06 |
| reviewbot | I have added your review to the Review list | 12:06 |
| marios | bhagyashris: ack | 12:08 |
| bhagyashris | needs ^ to test container build rhos18 patch | 12:09 |
| dasm|off | o/ | 12:18 |
| *** dasm|off is now known as dasm | 12:18 | |
| *** ysandeep|brb is now known as ysandeep | 12:31 | |
| akahat | rlandy, ping, 1x1. | 12:33 |
| ysandeep | bhagyashris, done | 12:35 |
| bhagyashris | ysandeep, marios thanks :) | 12:35 |
| chkumar|ruck | rlandy: dviroel|rover https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ci-config/+/46221 please +w it | 12:46 |
| dviroel|rover | chkumar|ruck: marios already did that | 12:47 |
| chkumar|ruck | ah yes | 12:47 |
| chkumar|ruck | dviroel|rover: marios thank you :-) | 12:47 |
| marios | \o np | 12:49 |
| rlandy | hmmm - seems done already | 12:50 |
| dviroel|rover | rlandy: chkumar|ruck: [de]provisioning dns records: https://steps.ci.openshift.org/reference/openstack-provision-dnsrecords / https://steps.ci.openshift.org/reference/openstack-deprovision-dnsrecords | 13:01 |
| rlandy | bhagyashris: hello ... are you all set with container registry for 18? | 13:02 |
| rlandy | dviroel|rover++ | 13:02 |
| rlandy | so we can automate that | 13:02 |
| rlandy | bhagyashris: should have been set up and permissioned for you | 13:02 |
| chkumar|ruck | dviroel|rover: awesome | 13:03 |
| chkumar|ruck | dviroel|rover++ | 13:03 |
| bhagyashris | rlandy, hey testing containers build push... | 13:03 |
| bhagyashris | but yeah looks like we have that here https://registry-console-default.cloud.registry.upshift.redhat.com/registry#/images/tripleorhos-18-rhel-9 | 13:04 |
| dviroel|rover | rlandy: we can, and extend to generate ClusterDeploymentCustomization | 13:05 |
| dviroel|rover | needed by Hive | 13:05 |
| rlandy | dviroel|rover: chkumar|ruck: k - send out our questions to abraverm - let's see what he has to say | 13:21 |
| *** amoralej is now known as amoralej|lunch | 13:32 | |
| dviroel|rover | rlandy: chkumar|ruck: https://zuul-ci.org/docs/nodepool/5.0.0/openstack.html#attr-providers.[openstack].clean-floating-ips | 13:40 |
| dviroel|rover | can't we just change that? | 13:41 |
| chkumar|ruck | dviroel|rover: https://softwarefactory-project.io/r/plugins/gitiles/config/+/refs/heads/master/nodepool/static_config/ibm-bm3-nodepool-launcher.yaml#11 | 13:45 |
| chkumar|ruck | dviroel|rover: may be we need a seperate nodepool for hive work? | 13:45 |
| chkumar|ruck | https://softwarefactory-project.io/r/plugins/gitiles/config/+/refs/heads/master/nodepool/static_config/zs.yaml#618 | 13:46 |
| chkumar|ruck | same for vexxhost | 13:46 |
| chkumar|ruck | dviroel|rover: thank you for finding out that paramrs | 13:46 |
| ysandeep | rlandy, podified call | 13:46 |
| *** amoralej|lunch is now known as amoralej | 14:02 | |
| jm1 | reviewbot: add to review list https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ci-config/+/46414 | 14:04 |
| reviewbot | I have added your review to the Review list | 14:04 |
| *** ysandeep is now known as ysandeep|dinner | 14:30 | |
| rlandy | soniya29: kopecmartin: python-tempestconf | 14:35 |
| rlandy | https://trello.com/c/J8Q8tecY/2796-cixftbfsosp-171-rhel-8 | 14:35 |
| rlandy | FTBFS needs tempest team attention | 14:35 |
| rlandy | needs rebase | 14:35 |
| rlandy | we need someone from tempest team to address that ASAP | 14:35 |
| soniya29 | rlandy, looking | 14:35 |
| rlandy | soniya29: see note one last one | 14:37 |
| rlandy | we need a resolution there pls | 14:37 |
| rlandy | marios: any update on https://trello.com/c/923OH4T9/2803-cixlp1997362tripleociproa-standaloneffu-job-is-failing-upgrading-at-podman-exec-ovnclusternorthdbserver-with-error-can-only-crea? | 14:38 |
| marios | rlandy: chkumar|ruck: ysandeep|dinner: dviroel|rover: please when you next have time https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-jobs/+/46412 Update centos-8-wallaby-promoted-components-to-tripleo-ci-testing | 14:38 |
| soniya29 | rlandy, sure | 14:38 |
| marios | rlandy: just replied to apevec on that cix and moved to done (and upstream bug fix released) | 14:41 |
| rlandy | thanks | 14:42 |
| dviroel|rover | rlandy: gah, missed the meeting | 14:43 |
| dviroel|rover | chkumar|ruck: ^ | 14:43 |
| chkumar|ruck | me too missed it | 14:43 |
| kopecmartin | rlandy: i commented yesterday that it's ok to drop the latest patch, i commented again now | 14:43 |
| dviroel|rover | i was reviewing pini's PR, and missed - sorry | 14:44 |
| rlandy | kopecmartin: apevec was asking for a rebase there | 14:46 |
| rlandy | kopecmartin: maybe you can touch base with him directly to close this out? | 14:46 |
| rlandy | dviroel|rover: chkumar|ruck: no worries - covered it | 14:47 |
| dviroel|rover | dviroel|rover-- | 14:49 |
| kopecmartin | rlandy: i can play with the downstream repo , reset the head whatever, tomorrow, maybe in a few hours (my evening/night), in 8 minutes I'm hosting 1 hour long bootcamp and then i need to run a few errands | 14:53 |
| rlandy | kopecmartin: tomorrow is perfectly good | 14:55 |
| rlandy | thank you | 14:55 |
| kopecmartin | rlandy: cool, thanks, i wrote it down and put on top of everything else | 14:57 |
| rlandy | kopecmartin++ | 14:59 |
| chkumar|ruck | dviroel|rover: please have a look at mixed rhel job https://code.engineering.redhat.com/gerrit/c/testproject/+/437436 | 15:38 |
| chkumar|ruck | I will take a look tomorrow | 15:38 |
| chkumar|ruck | see ya! | 15:38 |
| * pojadhav out | 15:39 | |
| marios | rlandy: when you next have a few mins please check https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-jobs/+/46412 we need it to unblock c8/wallaby integration (no more components) | 15:39 |
| dviroel|rover | chkumar|ruck: hey | 15:39 |
| dviroel|rover | chkumar|ruck: your testproject failed due to missing containers, bad timing | 15:39 |
| dviroel|rover | chkumar|ruck: there is one job running now on 17.1 line | 15:39 |
| dviroel|rover | TASK [overcloud-deploy : Deploy the overcloud] ********************************* | 15:40 |
| rlandy | marios: left a question there | 15:42 |
| rlandy | ok with that approach or another | 15:42 |
| rlandy | if it's blocking we can go with this | 15:42 |
| * dviroel|rover lunch | 15:52 | |
| *** dviroel|rover is now known as dviroel|rover|lunch | 15:52 | |
| * rlandy needs to reboot - brb | 15:55 | |
| marios | ack rlandy_ i'll respond but lets see if there are other opinions there. i guess wallaby/8 is not gonna get us red to sit for a day while we decide that | 15:59 |
| *** dviroel|rover|lunch is now known as dviroel|rover | 16:38 | |
| dviroel|rover | marios: periodic-tripleo-ci-rhel-9-8-multinode-mixed-os-rhos-17.1 - SUCCESS | 16:38 |
| dviroel|rover | yey | 16:39 |
| *** amoralej is now known as amoralej|off | 16:40 | |
| marios | dviroel|rover: great thanks for update | 16:43 |
| * marios off will pickup tomorrow o | 16:43 | |
| marios | o/ | 16:43 |
| dviroel|rover | o/ | 16:45 |
| *** marios is now known as marios|out | 16:47 | |
| rlandy | dviroel|rover: finally accessed console | 16:50 |
| rlandy | hack hack on my /etc/hosts file | 16:50 |
| rlandy | but whatever | 16:50 |
| dviroel|rover | rlandy: good, but still weird | 17:00 |
| dviroel|rover | maybe due to some local ISP configuration? | 17:00 |
| * Tengu doubts | 17:02 | |
| Tengu | depends on what ended in the /etc/hosts (and the content of /etc/resolv.conf) | 17:02 |
| rlandy | in /etc hosts .... | 17:07 |
| dviroel|rover | Tengu: the issue appears when there is no manual config IIUC. So may be ISP default dns server | 17:07 |
| rlandy | I added two AWS DNA records | 17:07 |
| rlandy | DNS | 17:07 |
| rlandy | and /etc/resolv.conf is generated | 17:07 |
| * rlandy gives up on it | 17:08 | |
| rlandy | has some working hack for now | 17:08 |
| rlandy | total time waster | 17:09 |
| *** yadnesh is now known as yadnesh|away | 17:27 | |
| * dviroel|rover checking retry_limit issue on components | 17:31 | |
| *** jpena is now known as jpena|off | 17:35 | |
| rlandy | dviroel|rover: dasm: have a dr's appt late this afternoon so will be out a bit - meed any thing? | 17:44 |
| rlandy | need | 17:44 |
| dasm | rlandy: i'm good. thank you | 17:44 |
| dviroel|rover | rlandy: good, np | 17:44 |
| rlandy | dviroel|rover: alexander respondde | 17:45 |
| rlandy | are we sure we need access to that internal network? | 17:45 |
| dviroel|rover | rlandy: we need at least one network to connect OCP cluster and EDP node | 17:49 |
| dviroel|rover | rlandy: could be another network | 17:50 |
| dviroel|rover | rlandy: since floating ips, we could consider another approach on OCP endpoints | 17:51 |
| rlandy | dviroel|rover: ok - setting up rhos-01 and I promised chkumar|ruck the claim/delete roles - let's see what we can access tomorrow | 17:51 |
| *** ysandeep|dinner is now known as ysandeep | 18:13 | |
| dviroel|rover | rlandy: do you see component's retry_limit? | 18:13 |
| dviroel|rover | zed/wallaby | 18:14 |
| rlandy | dviroel|rover: looking | 18:14 |
| dviroel|rover | related to tripleo_podman role | 18:14 |
| dviroel|rover | which was renamed on master branch | 18:14 |
| *** ysandeep is now known as ysandeep|out | 18:14 | |
| rlandy | dviroel|rover: I see it on security | 18:14 |
| dviroel|rover | yep | 18:14 |
| dviroel|rover | ERROR! Could not find specified file in role: tasks/tripleo_podman_install.yml | 18:15 |
| dviroel|rover | which don't exist anymore on master branc | 18:15 |
| rlandy | dviroel|rover: the integration line on zed look sok | 18:15 |
| dviroel|rover | but exists on zed/wallaby | 18:15 |
| rlandy | or did that just kick before the problem started | 18:16 |
| rlandy | ie: would a promotion help you here? | 18:16 |
| dviroel|rover | rlandy: i'm trying to understand, but doesn't seems related | 18:16 |
| dviroel|rover | it is failing on tripleo_ansible role | 18:17 |
| dviroel|rover | which is a project/role requirement of the job | 18:17 |
| rlandy | let me look at the logs - sec | 18:18 |
| dviroel|rover | master: https://github.com/openstack/tripleo-ansible/tree/master/tripleo_ansible/roles/tripleo_podman/tasks | 18:18 |
| dviroel|rover | zed: https://github.com/openstack/tripleo-ansible/tree/stable/zed/tripleo_ansible/roles/tripleo_podman/tasks | 18:18 |
| rlandy | possible we are not using the correct branch checkout | 18:20 |
| rlandy | trusted/project_4/opendev.org/openstack/tripleo-ansible: | 18:21 |
| rlandy | canonical_name: opendev.org/openstack/tripleo-ansible | 18:21 |
| rlandy | checkout: master | 18:21 |
| rlandy | opendev.org/openstack/tripleo-ansible: | 18:21 |
| rlandy | canonical_hostname: opendev.org | 18:21 |
| rlandy | canonical_name: opendev.org/openstack/tripleo-ansible | 18:21 |
| rlandy | checkout: master | 18:21 |
| rlandy | checkout_description: zuul branch | 18:21 |
| rlandy | periodic-tripleo-ci-centos-9-standalone-security-zed | 18:21 |
| rlandy | dviroel|rover: ^^ | 18:21 |
| dviroel|rover | what | 18:22 |
| dviroel|rover | why? | 18:22 |
| rlandy | let's compare with integration line | 18:22 |
| * dviroel|rover gets previous job | 18:22 | |
| dviroel|rover | same thing | 18:23 |
| rlandy | periodic-tripleo-ci-centos-9-standalone-zed | 18:23 |
| rlandy | opendev.org/openstack/tripleo-ansible: | 18:23 |
| rlandy | canonical_hostname: opendev.org | 18:23 |
| rlandy | canonical_name: opendev.org/openstack/tripleo-ansible | 18:23 |
| rlandy | checkout: stable/zed | 18:23 |
| rlandy | so components are not doing the correct branch override for checkout | 18:23 |
| dviroel|rover | https://github.com/openstack/tripleo-ansible/commit/3efd098300e4972578ec516bf1a205992cf9f72d | 18:24 |
| dviroel|rover | hum, old files were just deleted | 18:24 |
| rlandy | dviroel|rover: yeah - want to meet for 5? | 18:24 |
| dviroel|rover | sure | 18:24 |
| rlandy | will explain | 18:24 |
| rlandy | https://meet.google.com/fyy-wqcd-pvt?pli=1&authuser=0 | 18:25 |
| dviroel|rover | rlandy: i was trying to find what changed from yesterday to today, but in the end, this is not right for some time | 18:45 |
| dviroel|rover | lo | 18:45 |
| dviroel|rover | lol | 18:45 |
| rlandy | dviroel|rover: you mean the branch stuff? | 18:45 |
| rlandy | yeah - probably broken for ages | 18:45 |
| rlandy | truth is a lot of stuff gets backported | 18:45 |
| rlandy | so we never noticed | 18:46 |
| rlandy | ie: the diff of the branches is not functionally huge | 18:46 |
| dviroel|rover | yep | 18:58 |
| dviroel|rover | testproject job is on standalone deployu already | 18:59 |
| rlandy | k - let me know if that solves it | 19:01 |
| dviroel|rover | i will file a bug | 19:13 |
| dviroel|rover | for that | 19:13 |
| rlandy | added bitwarden info for rhos-01 | 19:28 |
| rlandy | dviroel|rover: going afk - need me to vote on anything now? | 19:45 |
| *** rlandy is now known as rlandy|dr_appt | 19:46 | |
| dviroel|rover | rlandy|dr_appt: worked: | 19:54 |
| dviroel|rover | trusted/project_4/opendev.org/openstack/tripleo-ansible: | 19:54 |
| dviroel|rover | canonical_name: opendev.org/openstack/tripleo-ansible | 19:54 |
| dviroel|rover | checkout: stable/zed | 19:54 |
| dviroel|rover | commit: 65e2ed09d82cb860d2edcc308fc3fefe50acbfa4 | 19:54 |
| dviroel|rover | i will propose the patch | 19:54 |
| * jm1 definitely ready for a holiday.. | 20:22 | |
| * jm1 out for today | 20:22 | |
| dviroel|rover | rlandy|dr_appt: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-jobs/+/46416 | 20:57 |
| *** tosky_ is now known as tosky | 21:12 | |
| * dasm => offline | 21:26 | |
| *** dasm is now known as dasm|off | 21:26 | |
| *** dviroel|rover is now known as dviroel|out | 21:31 | |
| *** rlandy|dr_appt is now known as rlandy | 21:51 | |
| rlandy | dviroel|out: thanks | 21:53 |
| rlandy | only think we should check there is OVB | 21:53 |
| rlandy | chkumar|ruck: ^^ https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-jobs/+/46416 | 21:53 |
| *** rlandy is now known as rlandy|bbl | 22:29 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!