*** ysandeep|out is now known as ysandeep | 05:14 | |
frickler | does zuul ignore a recheck comment that is combined with an inline comment? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/789083 | 06:29 |
---|---|---|
*** rpittau|afk is now known as rpittau | 06:41 | |
*** jpena|off is now known as jpena | 07:07 | |
*** ysandeep is now known as ysandeep|lunch | 07:55 | |
*** odyssey4me is now known as Guest847 | 08:50 | |
*** ykarel is now known as ykarel|lunch | 09:03 | |
*** ysandeep|lunch is now known as ysandeep | 09:22 | |
*** ykarel|lunch is now known as ykarel | 10:21 | |
*** jpena is now known as jpena|lunch | 11:02 | |
*** bhagyashris is now known as bhagyashris|rover | 11:09 | |
*** dviroel|out is now known as dviroel | 11:13 | |
*** jpena|lunch is now known as jpena | 11:52 | |
fungi | frickler: i think so, i've noticed it also doesn't match one which includes a vote | 13:19 |
fungi | frickler: not so much "ignore" as the regex we've got in the pipeline configs just isn't matching those, i expect it could be made to with some additional effort | 13:20 |
*** ysandeep is now known as ysandeep|out | 14:37 | |
clarkb | fungi: any idea if the network issues to review yesterday were local or related to the service? | 14:39 |
fungi | i couldn't tell, they cleared up fairly quickly and nobody else expressed any problems | 14:40 |
fungi | i started some pings right away and didn't see packet loss | 14:40 |
clarkb | gotcha | 14:41 |
clarkb | re rechecks it is just operating off of the event stream output and applying a regex to the message field. Maybe set up the stream and filter for sandbox events then do some of the things you expect to work and see if the events are formatted differently? | 14:41 |
fungi | i think there's additional data prefixing the message when inline comments and votes are included | 14:44 |
fungi | so we probably just need a more greedy match at the start of the pattern | 14:44 |
clarkb | that would explain it | 14:45 |
*** ykarel is now known as ykarel|away | 14:51 | |
*** marios is now known as marios|out | 15:46 | |
*** jpena is now known as jpena|off | 16:11 | |
clarkb | saying it out loud here because I keep getting distracted but want to make progress on this stuff. Monday it would be good to land the gerrit theme updates and restart gerrit as well as upgrade gitea to 1.14.7 | 17:45 |
clarkb | Then we'll be able to do the gitea 1.15.x upgrade with minimal impact when we are comfortable doing that | 17:45 |
fungi | i agree with those assertions | 17:46 |
clarkb | fwiw replication apepars to be happy now after the network chagnes in vexxhost | 17:47 |
clarkb | we could remove the replication timeouts if we want btu I think they may be a good safety check? | 17:47 |
*** dviroel is now known as dviroel|afk | 17:49 | |
fungi | i think they're a good safeguard against future network instability. the internet is still the internet | 17:51 |
clarkb | This is interesting I'm doing local system updates and networking for any new connections is completely broken but this connection continues to function | 19:03 |
clarkb | I feel like I ran into this before but I have no idea what would cause that | 19:03 |
fungi | iptables? | 19:05 |
clarkb | nothing in there | 19:06 |
clarkb | and firewalld is supposedly not running | 19:06 |
clarkb | oh wait firwall-cmd --state says it isn't running but there is a process for it | 19:06 |
clarkb | I need to reboot anyway for the kernel and associated updates so I'll start there and debug mroe deeply if that doesn't fix it | 19:07 |
fungi | yeah, if existing connections are working and new connections are blocked, firewalls are the first place i check | 19:09 |
clarkb | it is happy now. I'll have to dig more next time if it happens | 19:13 |
rosmaita | hello ... suddenly seeing a lot of failures this afternoon in tempest-full-py3 ... the ones i've looked at for os-brick are failing during setup with "mkswap: error: /root/swapfile is mounted; will not make swapspace" | 19:47 |
rosmaita | https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?job_name=tempest-full-py3 | 19:48 |
rosmaita | doesn't seem to just be os-brick | 19:48 |
Clark[m] | rosmaita check out the openstack-discuss list. I have a write up on it | 19:50 |
rosmaita | i need better email filters ... sorry, i did check my mail before posting but didn't see it ... thanks | 19:51 |
rosmaita | got it: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-September/025057.html in case anyone else is looking | 19:53 |
fungi | if desired, we can enqueue/promote that devstack change to merge it sooner, since it's already approved | 20:00 |
fungi | heading out for a quick walk, then going to be working on dinner, but i should be around some later | 20:12 |
clarkb | I think it will enqueue itself to the gate soon anyway | 20:22 |
*** dviroel|afk is now known as dviroel | 21:00 | |
clarkb | I just +2'd a change and rechecked it in the same comment and that worked fwiw | 21:09 |
clarkb | 810554 in the zuul check queue if you want to take a look | 21:10 |
*** mazzy2 is now known as mazzy | 21:38 | |
*** dviroel is now known as dviroel|out | 21:53 | |
opendevreview | Jeremy Stanley proposed opendev/infra-specs master: Add a specification for Mailman 3 https://review.opendev.org/c/opendev/infra-specs/+/810990 | 22:38 |
fungi | clarkb: ^ not urgent, just a heads up | 22:38 |
fungi | i'll add it to the meeting agenda | 22:38 |
clarkb | thanks | 22:39 |
johnsom | Is this parted error a known issue? https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/7ea6b08ed61143b4b2e790a77f4a5b34 | 22:39 |
fungi | johnsom: it's the devstack swap bug clarkb posted about on the openstack-discuss ml | 22:40 |
johnsom | Ah, haven't read that for a few minutes. Thanks | 22:40 |
clarkb | it is a variant specific to rax because we have an ephemeral disk we can partition there rather than needing to use a swapfile, but ya same issue | 22:41 |
fungi | well, maybe, the error doesn't look the same to me | 22:41 |
fungi | but yeah | 22:41 |
clarkb | on clouds !rax we fail because mkswap won't make a swapfile on a file that is already a swapfile and on rax we fail to partition a device that is already partitioned | 22:41 |
clarkb | the fix is in the gate | 22:41 |
johnsom | Awesome, thank you. | 22:42 |
clarkb | the fix just merged. Time to recheck | 22:49 |
fungi | johnsom: ^ | 22:53 |
johnsom | Yep, thanks. | 22:54 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.2 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!