*** amoralej is now known as amoralej|lunch | 10:58 | |
*** amoralej|lunch is now known as amoralej | 12:53 | |
SvenKieske | could anyone more knowledgeable then me please have a look at https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/e804ca9b01f24a4ca7e1d7edb3e96fb3/log/job-output.txt and tell me that is not an issue with zuul / the job instance? looks like IO error in rsync to my eyes. | 13:11 |
---|---|---|
frickler | to me this does look like an issue with the zuul executor, but I didn't find more information in the logs there. will need some other infra-root to help with it | 13:29 |
jaltman | ianw: how is the kafs usage going? | 14:03 |
*** elodille1 is now known as elodilles_pto | 15:11 | |
Clark[m] | jaltman: the changes to test it are still in review I think. So no hard data yet | 15:47 |
Clark[m] | frickler: it is unfortunate that it isn't clear which command exits non zero. May need to rewrite that code to be a bit more specific to aid in understanding | 15:47 |
slittle1_ | question: is there a method rename orrrrrrrrr create an alias for a git repository? | 17:07 |
*** amoralej is now known as amoralej|off | 17:10 | |
slittle1_ | we recently dropped armada in favor of a new technology, but we have several git repos with names like 'openstack-armada-app', it would be nice to rename to 'app-openstack', but retain 'penstack-armada-app' as an alias to support older releases. | 17:10 |
Clark[m] | slittle_ we can rename repos with a planned Gerrit outage and that creates redirects in gitea but not Gerrit. | 17:11 |
slittle1_ | So is that a qualified yes ? | 17:13 |
slittle1_ | The alternative being to create a totally new git initialized from the old. The inconvenience being a few extra steps for any backports of fixes to older releases reliant on the old repo name. | 17:17 |
Clark[m] | Yes a qualified yes and it requires some planning due to the outsge | 17:27 |
slittle1_ | 14 gits would be impacted. | 17:33 |
slittle1_ | so old releases would still be able to clone/fetch using the old git name? | 17:36 |
Clark[m] | Only from opendev.org/ not from review.opendev.org | 17:42 |
frickler | Clark[m]: SvenKieske: the failure may have been caused by two promote jobs running in parallel, see https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/aaa554a39e434716a6a942e80b9485a0. maybe we should add some locking/semaphores in there? or just accept that these sometimes fail and fix up things on the next merge? | 19:59 |
JayF | fyi fedora repos apparently under dos attack according to the fediverse, if you all see any failures | 20:54 |
fungi | thanks for the heads up JayF! fingers crossed they get it under control, those situations are never fun and i definitely feel their pain | 21:07 |
JayF | "hmm, who should we ruin the days of?" "I know, how about a bunch of people providing software for free" -.- | 21:08 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!