| opendevreview | Merged openstack/diskimage-builder master: CentOS-7 EOL: remove jobs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/diskimage-builder/+/923450 | 00:35 |
|---|---|---|
| opendevreview | Steve Baker proposed openstack/diskimage-builder master: Remove EOLed CentOS 7 and RHEL 7 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/diskimage-builder/+/923459 | 02:32 |
| opendevreview | Steve Baker proposed openstack/diskimage-builder master: Remove EOLed CentOS 7 and RHEL 7 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/diskimage-builder/+/923459 | 02:37 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/diskimage-builder master: bootloader: Strip prior console settings https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/diskimage-builder/+/922961 | 03:18 |
| frickler | infra-root: the list https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/config-errors?branch=master&severity=error&skip=0 is slowly getting into a manageable state, so my next question regarding this is how we want to deal with the x/* projects showing up there | 07:39 |
| frickler | I don't think anyone has time or energy to chase the owners, so my suggestion would be to drop all of them from zuul, make a note on the ML, and wait for people to come back reporting that their changes don't test/merge | 07:41 |
| frickler | do we want to do that on our own or do we need to include someone with openstack authority since this is all within the openstack tenant? (though admittedly for mostly historical reasons) | 07:42 |
| frickler | also someone might want to ping our friends from starlingx once again and maybe a bit more forcefully lest they share the same fate | 07:43 |
| frickler | a related question would be whether at some point in time we want to do some further action on repos that have become abandoned, like possibly archive them similar to how openstack is retiring repos. maybe we can define some minimum liveness criteria for that, e.g. have at least one periodic(-weekly) test job that has had a non-zero percentage of passing runs over the last 12 months | 07:50 |
| fungi | frickler: i don't think we need any openstack community buy in for things outside the openstack/ git namespace unless it's an action that will impact openstack projects | 12:41 |
| fungi | but i do agree that removing them from zuul configuration is the right way to go. maybe we pre-announce our intention on service-announce and set a deadline, then remove any still broken projects from the tenant on/after the scheduled date | 12:42 |
| frickler | actually there may be some impact, like I think neutron was using x/tobiko for some tests. but I guess we should see that on the removal patch. maybe I can start by creating a wip version of that | 12:57 |
| *** iurygregory_ is now known as iurygregory | 13:02 | |
| fungi | probably better if neutron stops depending on an abandoned project, yeah | 13:07 |
| opendevreview | Jens Harbott proposed openstack/project-config master: Drop repos with config errors from x/ namespace https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-config/+/923509 | 13:22 |
| frickler | hmm, at least no immediate zuul config errors on ^^. but actually thinking about it, this doesn't directly change zuul config, so that wouldn't be expected anyway | 13:25 |
| fungi | right. we talked about finding ways to test whether tenant changes would introduce job config errors | 13:38 |
| opendevreview | Monty Taylor proposed zuul/zuul-jobs master: Hook poetry into ensure-python and build-python-release https://review.opendev.org/c/zuul/zuul-jobs/+/923094 | 14:08 |
| opendevreview | Monty Taylor proposed zuul/zuul-jobs master: Hook poetry into ensure-python and build-python-release https://review.opendev.org/c/zuul/zuul-jobs/+/923094 | 14:52 |
| igor-soares | Asking for a friend: does anyone know who to increase a zuul job timeout? | 17:21 |
| frickler | igor-soares: it is a job parameter, see e.g. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/glance/+/923486 for an example | 17:22 |
| igor-soares | Thanks, frickler! | 17:23 |
| frickler | it seems we are still having some issue with zuul db performance. https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/buildsets?pipeline=gate is taking 20-30s for me to load and without the filter I get no results at all | 18:05 |
| opendevreview | Steve Baker proposed openstack/diskimage-builder master: Remove EOLed CentOS 7 and RHEL 7 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/diskimage-builder/+/923459 | 21:53 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!