| -@gerrit:opendev.org- Stephen Finucane proposed: | 11:36 | |
| - [openstack/project-config] 979807: Initiate retirement of requestsexceptions https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-config/+/979807 | ||
| - [openstack/project-config] 979808: Retire requestsexceptions https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-config/+/979808 | ||
| -@gerrit:opendev.org- Stephen Finucane proposed: [openstack/project-config] 979808: Retire requestsexceptions https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-config/+/979808 | 11:37 | |
| -@gerrit:opendev.org- Stephen Finucane proposed: [zuul/zuul-jobs] 979814: Remove requestsexceptions https://review.opendev.org/c/zuul/zuul-jobs/+/979814 | 11:52 | |
| -@gerrit:opendev.org- Stephen Finucane proposed on behalf of sean mooney: [openstack/project-config] 951395: Update nodeset for test-release-openstack https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-config/+/951395 | 14:50 | |
| -@gerrit:opendev.org- Clark Boylan proposed: | 16:09 | |
| - [opendev/system-config] 979874: Actually test Gerrit upgrade from 3.11 to 3.12 https://review.opendev.org/c/opendev/system-config/+/979874 | ||
| - [opendev/system-config] 979875: Add Gerrit 3.13 images and testing https://review.opendev.org/c/opendev/system-config/+/979875 | ||
| @clarkb:matrix.org | we were testing 3.10 to 3.12 upgrades ... That first change fixes this. Then I'm adding 3.13 images and related testing so that we can maybe upgrade to 3.13 shortly after 3.12. We'll see as we learn more | 16:19 |
|---|---|---|
| @clarkb:matrix.org | fungi: then I'm reminded about that gerrit account cleanup. I don't think that happened yet right? Just want to make sure it doesn't fall through the cracks. I'm happy to do it too, but I think it is good for more people to have done these account surgery steps | 16:20 |
| @fungicide:matrix.org | it has not yet, no | 16:34 |
| -@gerrit:opendev.org- Clark Boylan proposed: [opendev/system-config] 979875: Add Gerrit 3.13 images and testing https://review.opendev.org/c/opendev/system-config/+/979875 | 16:45 | |
| @fungicide:matrix.org | i owe shrews a response on his bindep change, he replied to my gerrit comments by e-mail and i was going to point out that's sadly not yet an implemented workflow in gerrit, but turns out it actually is we just don't have it configured: https://review.opendev.org/Documentation/config-gerrit.html#receiveemail | 17:15 |
| @fungicide:matrix.org | is that something anyone would be interested in having working, if we could solve the hurdles related to it? | 17:15 |
| @clarkb:matrix.org | Is the main hurdle understanding the disk utilization? I wonder if gerrit automatically prunes the inbox | 17:17 |
| @fungicide:matrix.org | looks like we would just set up a dedicated inbox for it and then configure gerrit to poll that periodically via imap | 17:18 |
| @clarkb:matrix.org | I'm not opposed to it, though I will likely never use or test it myself having found Gerrit's use of email far too verbose for me to manage it | 17:18 |
| @fungicide:matrix.org | i do rely on gerrit's e-mail notifications a lot, though i'm unsure i'd have occasion to respond to them, i usually just treat them as a prompt to pull up that change in gertty (or to load a specific buildset result from the zuul dashboard) | 17:19 |
| @fungicide:matrix.org | and i have no idea how it manages the reply contents (just limited to adding general patchset-level comments, i suppose?) | 17:20 |
| @clarkb:matrix.org | it might be the sort of feature that we turn on and make note to people that it is experimental and if we can't manage it long term may go away | 17:21 |
| @clarkb:matrix.org | basically be clear upfront that we're unsure of what the long term management looks like but are happy to try it and see if we can make it work | 17:21 |
| @fungicide:matrix.org | right, the main reasons i'm bringing it up are 1. it's related to the recent discussion about what to do with the current mailbox/alias associated with gerrit notifications, and 2. in some cases (like the reply from shrews) collaborator comments may quietly go missing if it's not clear that replies by e-mail aren't expected to work | 17:23 |
| @clarkb:matrix.org | to be fair they've never worked, but yes some people may assume they do if using a different gerrit | 17:24 |
| @fungicide:matrix.org | oh, https://review.opendev.org/Documentation/intro-user.html#reply-by-email goes into a bit more detail on how the feature would work if configured | 17:24 |
| @clarkb:matrix.org | but yes I think my main concern is that we'll fill a 50gb inbox and then it will silently stop working | 17:24 |
| @fungicide:matrix.org | so it seems to actually parse traditional inline comment style replies and then figures out which responses are related to change messages, inline comments or file-level comments | 17:27 |
| @clarkb:matrix.org | this is a fun unexpected gerrit 3.13 "issue" looks like one of the objects selenium was manipulating is no longer present | 17:45 |
| @clarkb:matrix.org | oh its trying to select the tab for the zuul summary | 17:45 |
| @clarkb:matrix.org | I guess I'll hold a node and inspect the source that way | 17:45 |
| -@gerrit:opendev.org- Clark Boylan proposed: [opendev/system-config] 979875: Add Gerrit 3.13 images and testing https://review.opendev.org/c/opendev/system-config/+/979875 | 18:19 | |
| @clarkb:matrix.org | I looked at upstream and made an educated guess. If it works then my autohold is not needed otherwise I can check directly in a bit | 18:19 |
| -@gerrit:opendev.org- Clark Boylan proposed: [opendev/system-config] 979875: Add Gerrit 3.13 images and testing https://review.opendev.org/c/opendev/system-config/+/979875 | 19:42 | |
| -@gerrit:opendev.org- Zuul merged on behalf of Clark Boylan: [opendev/system-config] 951041: Purge paste01 and review02 backups on the smaller backup host https://review.opendev.org/c/opendev/system-config/+/951041 | 19:47 | |
| @clarkb:matrix.org | fungi: looks like that deployed and the backup dir is gone for paste01 (I didn't check review02 as I expect it was cleaned up too). Down to 72% utilized now | 20:05 |
| @fungicide:matrix.org | `Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on | 20:06 |
| /dev/mapper/main--202010-backups--202010 1007G 722G 286G 72% /opt/backups-202010` | ||
| @fungicide:matrix.org | yep, lgtm | 20:06 |
| -@gerrit:opendev.org- Clark Boylan proposed: [opendev/system-config] 976282: Upgrade Ansible on Bridge to Ansible 9 https://review.opendev.org/c/opendev/system-config/+/976282 | 20:10 | |
| @clarkb:matrix.org | corvus: ^ I cleaned up the file matchers used to test things in older patchsets | 20:10 |
| @clarkb:matrix.org | note there is a parent change that I had to make in order to get general CI for that working | 20:10 |
| @jim:acmegating.com | ah you planned to remove before merge. makes sense. lgtm. | 20:12 |
| @fungicide:matrix.org | infra-prod-remote-puppet-else is failing in deploy | 20:12 |
| @fungicide:matrix.org | https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/643ad58da8f94694a5e95a1f1c394ea1 | 20:13 |
| @fungicide:matrix.org | probably need to look in the encrypted log to determine why | 20:14 |
| @fungicide:matrix.org | or on bridge | 20:14 |
| @clarkb:matrix.org | ya bridge should have the log | 20:15 |
| @fungicide:matrix.org | TASK [puppet : copy system puppet modules] fatal: [translate-dev01.openstack.org]: FAILED! | 20:16 |
| @fungicide:matrix.org | it's a no_log task | 20:16 |
| @clarkb:matrix.org | I think that task copies the modules from bridge to the remote so it can puppet apply locally with consistent versions | 20:17 |
| @fungicide:matrix.org | server is reachable, 1279 days uptime, filesystems aren't full | 20:17 |
| @clarkb:matrix.org | could it be a network outage or full disk? | 20:17 |
| @clarkb:matrix.org | you're well ahead of me | 20:17 |
| @fungicide:matrix.org | only sorta, cooking dinner but about to start eating | 20:17 |
| @fungicide:matrix.org | though i do live in the future | 20:18 |
| @jim:acmegating.com | wonder if another puppet module moved like the batch i dealt with a while ago | 20:18 |
| @fungicide:matrix.org | that sounds likely, the vox pupuli transition is ongoing from what i understand | 20:21 |
| -@gerrit:opendev.org- Clark Boylan proposed: [opendev/system-config] 979875: Add Gerrit 3.13 images and testing https://review.opendev.org/c/opendev/system-config/+/979875 | 21:09 | |
| @clarkb:matrix.org | https://146.20.61.1/c/x/test-project/+/3?tab=change-view-tab-header-zuul-results-summary is the held gerrit. But I discovered we can use the ?tab parameter to select what we want and probably don't need a js script to click a button so I'm trying to simplify in the latest patchset | 21:10 |
| @clarkb:matrix.org | https://f58cd28be0f362b8c35f-fb7856030231c54b77f232c8ffa3c233.ssl.cf1.rackcdn.com/openstack/1556ca1eefe94cb6ad64113d2a1e294e/bridge99.opendev.org/screenshots/gerrit-change-page-3.png Gerrit 3.13 seems to be working. And the simplified screenshot method also works on all three tested Gerrit versions | 22:23 |
| @clarkb:matrix.org | oh good the 3.12 to 3.13 upgrade test just passed too so I think that change is read for review now | 22:24 |
| @clarkb:matrix.org | I think I'm going to work on a new wiki cert tomorrow | 22:41 |
| @clarkb:matrix.org | (just a heads up) | 22:41 |
| @fungicide:matrix.org | noted, thanks! | 22:42 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 4.1.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!
