Monday, 2017-10-23

*** acormier has quit IRC00:01
*** acormier has joined #openstack-ansible00:02
*** thorst has joined #openstack-ansible00:03
*** aaron__ has quit IRC00:06
*** acormier has quit IRC00:06
*** thorst has quit IRC00:07
*** thorst has joined #openstack-ansible00:07
*** thorst has quit IRC00:08
*** rodolof has joined #openstack-ansible00:20
*** snowman4839 has joined #openstack-ansible00:26
*** snowman48391 has quit IRC00:26
*** acormier has joined #openstack-ansible00:28
*** pbandark has quit IRC00:36
*** acormier has quit IRC00:36
*** acormier has joined #openstack-ansible00:36
*** rodolof has quit IRC00:38
*** yifei has joined #openstack-ansible00:50
*** thorst has joined #openstack-ansible01:11
*** thorst has quit IRC01:11
*** snowman48391 has joined #openstack-ansible01:22
*** snowman4839 has quit IRC01:22
*** snowman4839 has joined #openstack-ansible01:32
*** snowman48391 has quit IRC01:32
*** acormier_ has joined #openstack-ansible01:48
*** acormier has quit IRC01:52
*** kiennt26 has joined #openstack-ansible02:08
*** armaan has quit IRC02:09
*** hw_wutianwei has joined #openstack-ansible02:09
*** armaan has joined #openstack-ansible02:10
*** armaan has quit IRC02:14
*** ullbeking has joined #openstack-ansible02:30
*** acormier_ has quit IRC02:32
*** acormier has joined #openstack-ansible02:32
*** acormier has quit IRC02:37
*** chyka has joined #openstack-ansible02:45
*** masber has quit IRC02:47
*** duonghq has joined #openstack-ansible02:52
*** acormier has joined #openstack-ansible02:53
*** thorst has joined #openstack-ansible03:02
*** dave-mccowan has quit IRC03:05
openstackgerritKevin Carter (cloudnull) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Hyper-converge our container usage  https://review.openstack.org/49939603:06
*** thorst has quit IRC03:08
*** chyka has quit IRC03:11
*** dxiri has joined #openstack-ansible03:11
*** dxiri has quit IRC03:14
*** yolanda has quit IRC03:23
*** acormier has quit IRC03:28
*** acormier has joined #openstack-ansible03:29
*** acormier has quit IRC03:30
*** acormier has joined #openstack-ansible03:30
*** masber has joined #openstack-ansible03:33
*** gkadam has joined #openstack-ansible03:35
*** dxiri has joined #openstack-ansible03:36
*** gkadam_ has joined #openstack-ansible03:40
*** gkadam has quit IRC03:41
*** yifei has quit IRC03:49
*** udesale has joined #openstack-ansible03:49
*** acormier has quit IRC03:59
*** acormier has joined #openstack-ansible04:00
*** acormier has quit IRC04:05
*** nshetty has joined #openstack-ansible04:09
openstackgerritKevin Carter (cloudnull) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Improve execution time by using dynamic groups  https://review.openstack.org/51387604:12
*** dxiri has quit IRC04:17
*** Dinesh_Bhor has joined #openstack-ansible04:19
*** pmannidi has joined #openstack-ansible04:21
*** captaindave has quit IRC04:25
*** captaindave has joined #openstack-ansible04:49
*** captaindave has joined #openstack-ansible04:49
*** armaan has joined #openstack-ansible05:02
armaanGood morning105:33
armaans/1/!05:33
Taseerevrardjp: Is this the reason of linter failures? => http://logs.openstack.org/71/503971/10/check/openstack-tox-linters/e4135fe/job-output.txt.gz#_2017-10-22_17_17_00_06064505:41
armaanodyssey4me: Hello, I got this error on running glance playbook http://paste.openstack.org/show/624326/, I am wondering whether it is related to this commit https://github.com/openstack/openstack-ansible-ceph_client/commit/62ecbd9eb60fe8e3b676a267c2ae84b623fc8bd405:45
*** taseer1 has joined #openstack-ansible05:47
*** taseer2 has joined #openstack-ansible05:48
*** Taseer has quit IRC05:48
*** taseer2 is now known as Taseer05:49
*** taseer1 has quit IRC05:52
armaanodyssey4me: I rolled back to https://github.com/openstack/openstack-ansible-ceph_client/commit/9e336a5622a8c2d5797c3d9acaf05b4f130d3505 and the error disappeared.05:57
*** jvidal has joined #openstack-ansible06:06
*** Oku_OS-away is now known as Oku_OS06:09
*** udesale__ has joined #openstack-ansible06:09
*** udesale has quit IRC06:10
*** udesale has joined #openstack-ansible06:12
hwoaranggood morning06:13
hwoarangodyssey4me: i spent some time with Monty on Friday to try to get logging to work but we couldn't fix it06:14
hwoarangodyssey4me: one particular point of interest is this http://logs.openstack.org/06/513706/12/check/openstack-ansible-functional-opensuse-423/0e0ea47/job-output.txt.gz#_2017-10-20_21_54_19_80916106:14
*** udesale__ has quit IRC06:14
hwoarangas you see it runs the 'run' phase from the stable/newton branch even though we are working on master06:14
hwoarangi will be on and off this week so you might want to follow up on that with him in case i dont make it06:15
*** snowman4839 has quit IRC06:20
*** snowman4839 has joined #openstack-ansible06:20
*** taseer1 has joined #openstack-ansible06:29
*** Taseer has quit IRC06:29
*** taseer2 has joined #openstack-ansible06:30
*** taseer1 has quit IRC06:34
*** mma has joined #openstack-ansible06:39
*** mma has quit IRC06:41
*** mma has joined #openstack-ansible06:41
openstackgerritMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-apt_package_pinning stable/newton: Initial OSA zuul v3 role jobs  https://review.openstack.org/51398506:43
*** taseer2 is now known as Taseer06:49
*** rodolof has joined #openstack-ansible06:53
*** mma has quit IRC06:58
*** mma has joined #openstack-ansible06:59
*** pcaruana has joined #openstack-ansible07:00
evrardjpTaseer: yeah07:05
evrardjpTaseer: please see the lines before for what to change07:05
Taseerevrardjp: So I need to remove the shell commands, and also change git version ?07:14
evrardjpcompare to other repos07:14
evrardjpit will help you07:14
evrardjpand good morning everyone07:15
Taseerevrardjp: okay, thanks. and Good Morning to you as well07:15
evrardjp:)07:15
evrardjpshell should be used when doing bash specific things, or doing pipes/redirections07:16
*** flaviosr has quit IRC07:16
evrardjpif not, use command07:16
evrardjpyou should handle the changed_when and failed_when case manually for both modules (command/shell)07:16
Taseerokay, I'll look into it07:17
*** vnogin has joined #openstack-ansible07:24
openstackgerritManuel Buil proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_neutron master: L3 Support for ODL deployments  https://review.openstack.org/49745807:37
armaanevrardjp: Hello! I am setting up a 14.2.9 environment which I will upgrade to Ocata and then I will be able to give you an update on https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/172220007:41
openstackLaunchpad bug 1722200 in openstack-ansible "percona-xtrabackup unmet dependencies" [Undecided,New]07:41
armaanevrardjp: I was out of office and hence the silence on the bug report :)07:43
openstackgerritJean-Philippe Evrard proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Revert "Set OpenStack-Ansible release to 17.0.0.0b1"  https://review.openstack.org/51417707:44
evrardjparmaan: no worries. Thanks for the feedback.07:44
armaanevrardjp: no problem, btw -- Any idea what this means "FAILED! => {"failed": true, "msg": "list object has no element 0"}"07:45
evrardjpyeah07:46
evrardjpin one of your tasks you have babar[0] where babar is []07:46
evrardjpcan't get index 007:46
armaanevrardjp: http://paste.openstack.org/show/624336/07:46
evrardjpneutron post install L16 let me check07:47
openstackgerritMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_neutron stable/newton: Add git and iptables to the list of packages  https://review.openstack.org/51262707:47
openstackgerritMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_neutron stable/ocata: Add git and iptables to the list of packages  https://review.openstack.org/51263007:47
evrardjparmaan: which branch?07:48
armaanevrardjp: 14.2.907:48
evrardjpoh that's N07:48
evrardjparmaan: could you rerun with -vv to see the items?07:49
armaanevrardjp: yeah, I will be upgrading to O07:49
armaanok07:49
evrardjparmaan: I suspect this is the line where your issue happens07:50
evrardjphttps://github.com/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_neutron/blob/14.2.9/tasks/neutron_post_install.yml#L3007:50
evrardjpbut this should be ok: https://github.com/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_neutron/blob/14.2.9/defaults/main.yml#L12707:51
evrardjpso I am worried you could have a bad override somewhere07:52
armaanevrardjp: ohh, so this could also be related to my openstack_user_config.yml or user_variables.yml ?07:52
armaanoh07:52
evrardjpyeah07:52
evrardjpbut that's pure speculation for now. We need to find out which list is empty first :p07:52
armaanevrardjp: even with "-vvvv" i am getting only this http://paste.openstack.org/show/624340/07:58
evrardjpok, bazooka then07:59
evrardjpANSIBLE_DEBUG=true07:59
evrardjpthen your command.07:59
evrardjpbut that's not normal to not see more verbose things.07:59
armaanroger that08:00
evrardjpwe should, IIRC, see the items by doing a more verbose run.08:00
*** flaviosr has joined #openstack-ansible08:00
armaanyeah, i am surprised that there is no further output even with -vvv08:03
*** pbandark has joined #openstack-ansible08:06
armaanevrardjp: Looks like it was indeed a bad override. I copied the configuration from another environment and ran the playbook again which worked without any issue. Sorry for the noise.08:11
evrardjpno worries08:11
evrardjpwhich override was it? the plugin?08:11
*** mrch has joined #openstack-ansible08:11
armaanopenvswitch08:12
armaanevrardjp: not sure which specific it was but my ovs conifg now looks like this http://paste.openstack.org/show/624345/08:15
armaans/specific/specific override08:15
*** mbuil has joined #openstack-ansible08:16
evrardjpwell we definitely need an ovs scenario. I didn't know you were using it08:17
evrardjpI should track who is doing what somewhere, but my brain can't handle that :p08:17
armaanoh we are using it in production (deployed with OSA). Perhaps you could create a etherpad for that.08:19
*** pmannidi is now known as pmannidi|AFK08:20
openstackgerritMerged openstack/openstack-ansible master: Move dynamic grouping conditional  https://review.openstack.org/51196708:30
*** aaron_ has joined #openstack-ansible08:34
*** aaron_ has quit IRC08:35
evrardjparmaan: yeah, but I think it would be great to have it as a scenario in the future, because less and less ppl got interest of it between N and P. But now the trend is getting back to it I'd say08:46
armaanevrardjp: Ok, Are you going to Sydney?08:47
evrardjpI am08:47
evrardjpare you?08:47
armaanevrardjp: No, i am skipping because of bad health but I will ask my team members who are travelling there to discuss this with you in Sydney.08:51
openstackgerritJean-Philippe Evrard proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-plugins stable/newton: Initial OSA zuul v3 role jobs  https://review.openstack.org/51403008:55
openstackgerritJean-Philippe Evrard proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-plugins stable/newton: Initial OSA zuul v3 role jobs  https://review.openstack.org/51403008:57
evrardjparmaan: great09:19
evrardjpAFK for a while09:20
*** cshen has joined #openstack-ansible09:25
*** electrofelix has joined #openstack-ansible09:31
evrardjp[m]armaan: I am sorry to hear the other part. Get well. (if that's proper wording)09:33
armaanevrardjp: thank you :)09:33
*** yolanda has joined #openstack-ansible09:34
*** hw_wutianwei has quit IRC09:35
*** stuartgr has joined #openstack-ansible09:38
openstackgerritJesse Pretorius (odyssey4me) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_tempest master: Use the deployment host to download images for tempest  https://review.openstack.org/51320009:39
*** mbuil has quit IRC09:39
*** br0k3n has joined #openstack-ansible09:40
*** maybebuggy has joined #openstack-ansible09:40
odyssey4meo/09:43
odyssey4meevrardjp I'm a little confused by your suggestion in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/513457/ - the tests in there are for the repo itself, and therefore in context.09:43
evrardjp[m]well... it's not for an inside test.09:44
evrardjp[m]what I mean there, is that we'll probably have a tangled mess if we multiply definitions09:45
evrardjp[m]for example, extra tests for the neutron role that are self contained to neutron are defined in neutron09:45
evrardjp[m]os_neutron I mean.09:45
evrardjp[m]here it's cross repo. So I am wondering what's best, and if we shouldn't go for what you suggested: the tests repo as a project config.09:46
*** cshen has quit IRC09:47
evrardjp[m]I am split between the two tbh.09:47
*** cshen has joined #openstack-ansible09:49
odyssey4meI took the view that the tests repo defines the basic construct to allow cross-repo job definition, but not all the definitions of the leaf jobs09:50
odyssey4methe leaf jobs, imo belong in context - ie in the repo exercising the test09:50
odyssey4methat way the test can be changed, and the change exercised with it09:51
odyssey4meif we define those jobs in the tests repo, we have no way of testing the change09:51
odyssey4me(except to merge or use depends on, which negates the purpose of in-repo testing in the first place)09:51
*** cshen has quit IRC09:52
odyssey4methe thing defined in the tests repo will be used across many roles and many other repositories - whereas the thing defined in the lxc_hosts repo is only used there09:52
*** cshen has joined #openstack-ansible09:54
*** cshen has quit IRC09:58
*** koukou has joined #openstack-ansible10:03
*** kiennt26 has quit IRC10:05
*** udesale has quit IRC10:06
openstackgerritJesse Pretorius (odyssey4me) proposed openstack/ansible-hardening master: Remove unified queue from gate pipeline  https://review.openstack.org/51420410:08
openstackgerritJesse Pretorius (odyssey4me) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-apt_package_pinning master: Remove unified queue from gate pipeline  https://review.openstack.org/51420610:08
openstackgerritJesse Pretorius (odyssey4me) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-ceph_client master: Remove unified queue from gate pipeline  https://review.openstack.org/51420810:09
openstackgerritJesse Pretorius (odyssey4me) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-galera_client master: Remove unified queue from gate pipeline  https://review.openstack.org/51420910:09
openstackgerritJesse Pretorius (odyssey4me) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-galera_server master: Remove unified queue from gate pipeline  https://review.openstack.org/51421110:10
openstackgerritJesse Pretorius (odyssey4me) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-haproxy_server master: Remove unified queue from gate pipeline  https://review.openstack.org/51421210:11
openstackgerritJesse Pretorius (odyssey4me) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-lxc_container_create master: Remove unified queue from gate pipeline  https://review.openstack.org/51421310:11
openstackgerritJesse Pretorius (odyssey4me) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-lxc_hosts master: Remove unified queue from gate pipeline  https://review.openstack.org/51421410:12
openstackgerritJesse Pretorius (odyssey4me) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-memcached_server master: Remove unified queue from gate pipeline  https://review.openstack.org/51421510:13
openstackgerritJesse Pretorius (odyssey4me) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-openstack_hosts master: Remove unified queue from gate pipeline  https://review.openstack.org/51421610:13
openstackgerritJesse Pretorius (odyssey4me) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-openstack_openrc master: Remove unified queue from gate pipeline  https://review.openstack.org/51421710:14
openstackgerritJesse Pretorius (odyssey4me) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_aodh master: Remove unified queue from gate pipeline  https://review.openstack.org/51421810:15
openstackgerritJesse Pretorius (odyssey4me) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_barbican master: Remove unified queue from gate pipeline  https://review.openstack.org/51421910:15
openstackgerritJesse Pretorius (odyssey4me) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_cinder master: Remove unified queue from gate pipeline  https://review.openstack.org/51422010:16
openstackgerritJesse Pretorius (odyssey4me) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_cloudkitty master: Remove unified queue from gate pipeline  https://review.openstack.org/51422110:17
openstackgerritJesse Pretorius (odyssey4me) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_designate master: Remove unified queue from gate pipeline  https://review.openstack.org/51422210:17
openstackgerritJesse Pretorius (odyssey4me) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_glance master: Remove unified queue from gate pipeline  https://review.openstack.org/51422310:18
*** armaan has quit IRC10:19
openstackgerritJesse Pretorius (odyssey4me) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_gnocchi master: Remove unified queue from gate pipeline  https://review.openstack.org/51422410:19
*** armaan has joined #openstack-ansible10:19
openstackgerritJesse Pretorius (odyssey4me) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_heat master: Remove unified queue from gate pipeline  https://review.openstack.org/51422510:19
openstackgerritJesse Pretorius (odyssey4me) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_horizon master: Remove unified queue from gate pipeline  https://review.openstack.org/51422610:20
openstackgerritJesse Pretorius (odyssey4me) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_ironic master: Remove unified queue from gate pipeline  https://review.openstack.org/51422710:21
*** cshen has joined #openstack-ansible10:21
openstackgerritJesse Pretorius (odyssey4me) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_keystone master: Remove unified queue from gate pipeline  https://review.openstack.org/51422910:21
openstackgerritJesse Pretorius (odyssey4me) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_magnum master: Remove unified queue from gate pipeline  https://review.openstack.org/51423010:22
openstackgerritJesse Pretorius (odyssey4me) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_molteniron master: Remove unified queue from gate pipeline  https://review.openstack.org/51423110:22
openstackgerritJesse Pretorius (odyssey4me) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_neutron master: Remove unified queue from gate pipeline  https://review.openstack.org/51423210:23
openstackgerritJesse Pretorius (odyssey4me) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_nova master: Remove unified queue from gate pipeline  https://review.openstack.org/51423310:24
*** cshen has quit IRC10:24
openstackgerritJesse Pretorius (odyssey4me) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_rally master: Remove unified queue from gate pipeline  https://review.openstack.org/51423410:25
openstackgerritJesse Pretorius (odyssey4me) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_sahara master: Remove unified queue from gate pipeline  https://review.openstack.org/51423510:25
openstackgerritJesse Pretorius (odyssey4me) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_searchlight master: Remove unified queue from gate pipeline  https://review.openstack.org/51423610:26
openstackgerritJesse Pretorius (odyssey4me) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_swift master: Remove unified queue from gate pipeline  https://review.openstack.org/51423710:26
openstackgerritJesse Pretorius (odyssey4me) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_tacker master: Remove unified queue from gate pipeline  https://review.openstack.org/51423810:27
openstackgerritJesse Pretorius (odyssey4me) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_tempest master: Remove unified queue from gate pipeline  https://review.openstack.org/51423910:28
openstackgerritJesse Pretorius (odyssey4me) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_trove master: Remove unified queue from gate pipeline  https://review.openstack.org/51424010:28
openstackgerritJesse Pretorius (odyssey4me) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_watcher master: Remove unified queue from gate pipeline  https://review.openstack.org/51424110:29
openstackgerritJesse Pretorius (odyssey4me) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_zaqar master: Remove unified queue from gate pipeline  https://review.openstack.org/51424210:30
openstackgerritJesse Pretorius (odyssey4me) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-pip_install master: Remove unified queue from gate pipeline  https://review.openstack.org/51424310:30
openstackgerritJesse Pretorius (odyssey4me) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-plugins master: Remove unified queue from gate pipeline  https://review.openstack.org/51424410:31
openstackgerritJesse Pretorius (odyssey4me) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-rabbitmq_server master: Remove unified queue from gate pipeline  https://review.openstack.org/51424510:32
evrardjpodyssey4me: re-adapted my vote. I misclicked, wanted to remove my +W and +2 by -1, did -w.10:32
evrardjpbut after further thinking, put the +W back, and we'll discuss this later in a community meeting10:32
openstackgerritJesse Pretorius (odyssey4me) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-repo_build master: Remove unified queue from gate pipeline  https://review.openstack.org/51424610:32
odyssey4meokie dokey10:32
openstackgerritJesse Pretorius (odyssey4me) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-repo_server master: Remove unified queue from gate pipeline  https://review.openstack.org/51424710:33
evrardjpodyssey4me: because in the community meeting we have a spot for liaisons to talk about their pending items, I think it would be good to talk about zuul v3, how we implemented jobs, and why we did it that way.10:33
*** br0k3n1 has joined #openstack-ansible10:33
openstackgerritJesse Pretorius (odyssey4me) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-rsyslog_client master: Remove unified queue from gate pipeline  https://review.openstack.org/51424810:33
odyssey4meoh ok10:33
*** br0k3n has quit IRC10:34
odyssey4meevrardjp am I seeing this right - there aren't yet very many jobs for ocata... mostly done for newton, but only about 3 for ocata10:34
openstackgerritJesse Pretorius (odyssey4me) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-rsyslog_server master: Remove unified queue from gate pipeline  https://review.openstack.org/51424910:34
evrardjpthis way everyone can catch up in one meeting, and if there is a conversation item that needs further discussion, we can plan that conversation on the channel later.10:34
evrardjpodyssey4me: yes I had to go yesterday, and my newton updated just sucked, so I didn't reproduce my terribleness into O10:35
evrardjpI will do that today10:35
odyssey4mewhat do you mean?10:36
odyssey4meoh - did the initial patch miss some things?10:36
evrardjpyeah. So I had to manually change all of them.10:36
evrardjpbecause it was done in the morning "real quick"10:36
evrardjplesson learned.10:36
*** br0k3n has joined #openstack-ansible10:36
odyssey4meja, and make sure the conf.py changes are included - odd that they seem to pass sometimes and not others10:37
evrardjpyes, I've seen that.10:37
*** br0k3n1 has quit IRC10:37
evrardjpI've also seen, on some patchsets, that this oslosphinx_cgit_whatever was defined twice.10:38
evrardjpso I will go through all branches, all repos, to make this uniform.10:38
odyssey4meit's not really that important10:38
odyssey4mewhat is important is that the last one counts10:38
odyssey4meand that master is right, so that from now on it's correct10:39
odyssey4methat settings only actually matters for the oslosphinx theme anyway, and I think it was fixed to not even need that setting any more - I haven't looked into it since newton10:39
evrardjpthe last one counts?10:41
evrardjpyou mean it's only important for master branch for docs AND renos?10:41
evrardjpI thought it was only important for master branch for renos.10:41
evrardjpI need to step up my game in sphinx I think :p10:41
*** cshen has joined #openstack-ansible10:42
evrardjpodyssey4me: did you see the last patches from cloudnull? Very interesting ones.10:42
odyssey4meI'm not really seeing improved deploy time here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/499396/10:43
odyssey4mebut meh10:43
evrardjpwe should maybe have a commit that depends on both to see the improvement10:44
*** cshen has quit IRC10:44
evrardjpthe other one should see a big improvement on large inventories I guess10:47
evrardjpfor the other one your review would be interesting, maybe you have another ideas on what can be used/facts10:52
gunixcloudnull: there was an error in my config. i still had nfs for glance, but glance should use swift10:52
odyssey4meevrardjp which patches are you talking about?10:54
odyssey4meevrardjp FYI whitespace, and some suggesitons: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/513406/1610:54
evrardjpodyssey4me: I doubt there is a need for the upgrade, but it doesn't hurt too much as periodic I guess10:56
evrardjpgood catch on the rest, as usual10:56
evrardjpodyssey4me: the other one I was talking about is https://review.openstack.org/#/c/513876/10:57
odyssey4meugh, a hammer10:59
evrardjpmjolnir?11:00
*** PTO has joined #openstack-ansible11:01
odyssey4meit seems like a good idea, although it makes the playbooks fairly unreadable11:01
evrardjpi agree11:01
evrardjptwo different playbooks instead ?11:02
odyssey4meno, that'd probably make things worse11:02
odyssey4meyour suggestion of using meaningful variable names would make it better11:02
*** armaan has quit IRC11:03
*** DanyC has joined #openstack-ansible11:03
*** armaan has joined #openstack-ansible11:03
odyssey4mebut doing this also means that we have to design the roles for two ways of implementing - both serialised and not11:03
openstackgerritTaseer Ahmed proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Integrate Congress with OSA.  https://review.openstack.org/50397111:03
*** dave-mccowan has joined #openstack-ansible11:03
evrardjpodyssey4me: do you think that would be a problem for current roles?11:07
evrardjpand what would the problem be? The restart of services?11:08
*** yolanda has quit IRC11:09
openstackgerritOpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_freezer master: Updated from global requirements  https://review.openstack.org/51425811:10
evrardjphello proposal bot.11:10
odyssey4meevrardjp we'll just have to see11:11
gunixhey guys. i changed my config and removed nfs from glance but i still see a lot of nfs entries in the generated openstack_inventory.json file. i guess i somehow need to regenrated that file, by reinitiating previous steps or deleting it. what's the best practice here?11:11
odyssey4meI'm a little confused at how the serialisation is taking *ssooooo* long, apparently, when it's only doing a single host - then all for each group....11:12
odyssey4methe patch is adding a ton of complexity, which has very little gain from what I can see11:12
odyssey4meI can see that being useful for newton, but ocata onwards has serial 1,100%11:13
odyssey4meso, as previously stated on the topic - I'd like to see some real data11:13
evrardjpthe intent was to indeed backport it to N.11:13
odyssey4meand more importantly, logan- and jmccrory should be the voters IMO11:13
evrardjpI agree.11:14
odyssey4meI'd rather see that applied to only N, and not for Ocata onwards11:14
evrardjpodyssey4me: yeah I just thought of that11:14
evrardjpmaybe it can be an opt in playbook instead11:14
odyssey4mewell, not very many people are still running N - it's only RPC11:14
evrardjp"only" :P11:15
odyssey4mewell, as far as we know11:15
odyssey4methe point is that if this isn't a problem for ocata onwards, then we shouldn't add the complexity11:16
evrardjpagreed11:16
odyssey4mein principle I don't mind the idea - but it's adding a bunch of stuff that would take me a few hours of concentration to figure out what it's doing... and that means that anyone new coming into the project would struggle too11:17
odyssey4meand as I've said many times before - we should not be trying to work around serialised deployment - we should be changing how we dploy to improve execution time11:18
openstackgerritJean-Philippe Evrard proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Initial integrated zuulv3 jobs  https://review.openstack.org/51340611:18
odyssey4methese are all just band-aid hacks11:18
odyssey4mehooray - got a pass for https://review.openstack.org/51320011:18
openstackgerritJean-Philippe Evrard proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Initial integrated zuulv3 jobs  https://review.openstack.org/51340611:19
*** smatzek has joined #openstack-ansible11:20
evrardjpodyssey4me: yeah ! :)11:21
evrardjplet me review it properly this time I guess :p11:21
gunixguys? meow. please help :D11:25
evrardjpgunix: is that a greenfield?11:27
evrardjpif you don't care about your existing environment and your existing containers, you can effectively not care. :p11:28
evrardjpdelete your containers, delete your openstack_inventory.json, regenerate everything, re-deploy.11:28
evrardjpif you want to keep stuff that's different.11:28
odyssey4meIIRC hostvars are not overwritten by the dynamic inventory, which is why config in openstack_user_config should be used sparingly11:29
odyssey4meoverwritten isn't the right word - I mean removed11:29
evrardjpgunix: worst case, manual edit.11:29
odyssey4meie if you have a dict of config in o_u_c, then remove it the dyn inv won't remove it... so you have to manually remove it11:30
gunixi don't know what you mean with "greenfield"11:30
gunixi can try to delete the openstack_inventory.json11:30
evrardjpbest case, your hosts where bare metal nodes only and you can remove the host, then re-add it.11:30
evrardjpgunix: don't11:30
gunixand setup-everything.yml11:30
evrardjpnot without knowing what you're doing :p11:30
gunixi have no ideea what i am doing11:30
odyssey4methis is probably why evrardjp's blog post on using jinja in u_o_c instead is better, because it's more dynamic and less permanent11:30
evrardjpgreenfield, is basically a new install.11:31
gunixevrardjp: it's a POC11:31
gunixat home11:31
gunixon my desktop11:31
evrardjpso you don't care11:31
evrardjpok11:31
gunixyes exactlhy11:31
evrardjpthen remove all your containers11:31
evrardjpwe have a playbook for that11:31
gunixi can just revert all VMs to snapshots11:31
evrardjpthen remove the openstack_inventory.json11:31
evrardjpthen rerun setup-everything.11:31
gunixok11:32
evrardjpodyssey4me: well technically if ppl follow our docs, this shouldn't be required anymore. host overrides/group overrides exist in user space now .11:32
evrardjpand it's documented11:32
evrardjp(iirc)11:32
evrardjpnow there are a few exceptions of precedence (is_metal)11:33
evrardjpbut let's keep things simple for contributors, in this case gunix:11:34
gunixrunning openstack-ansible lxc-containers-destroy.yml now11:34
evrardjpcrash everything start again.11:34
evrardjpgunix: woot11:34
evrardjpyeah!11:34
gunixevrardjp: what if i did the config, and after this i apply some changes to it and want to deploy new stuff? it's a theoretical question11:35
*** gparaskevas has joined #openstack-ansible11:38
gunixlets say in prod i did a config and deployed it and after that i get 2 new hosts and want to deploy them as computes. can i just add them to openstack_user_config.yml and rerun setup-everything?11:38
*** rodolof has quit IRC11:43
*** rodolof has joined #openstack-ansible11:43
Neptuhej11:44
Neptui have a question regarding the networking part11:44
Neptuwhay i need to create a vlan and a bridge to the vlan11:44
Neptuim trying to follow this tutorial https://docs.openstack.org/project-deploy-guide/openstack-ansible/draft/app-config-test.html11:44
Neptuand I wonder a bit about the network setup11:44
odyssey4meevrardjp afaik the docs still show the example using u_o_c/conf.d entries11:47
gunixNeptu: i can share my network settings if you want11:52
gunixat vlan i had some problems because i didn't respect the guidelines11:53
Neptugunix: that will be nice... Im trying to get a starting point to run the ansible11:53
Neptubut first of all why you need 3 networks11:53
Neptucan you just run all on one?11:53
gunixNeptu: well you don't need 3 physical networks, but OSA wants you to create the bridges so that it has what to work with11:54
gunixi created about 5 physical networks for my osa deploy, but it's not mandatory11:54
Neptugunix can u share the conf for all the hosts11:55
Neptuim tyring to figure out how to do it right11:55
odyssey4meNeptu doing it the way we do means you can always change the underlying networking, but all the config stays the same... so you can grow from a single NIC to multiple bonded NIC's etc... all the openstack configurations are connected to bridges, not NIC's... so the NIC's can change without requiring changes to configs other than the host network configs11:56
gunixneptu https://bpaste.net/show/704801b9764211:56
gunixyou have controller node 1, compute node 1, cinder node 1, and swift node 1 in this config11:57
jamesdentonmornin folks11:57
gunixNeptu: however that is not good for prod, i will give you a picture with how it should look on prod11:57
gunixNeptu: https://docs.openstack.org/project-deploy-guide/openstack-ansible/newton/_images/networkarch-container-external.png11:57
gunixthis is how prod should look11:58
gunix4 interfaces, two in one bond and two in another bond, with mgmt and storage on one bond and vxlan and vlan on the other one11:58
evrardjpmorning jamesdenton11:58
*** thorst has joined #openstack-ansible11:59
gunixNeptu: here is example /etc/network/interfaces config for prod, with 2 bonds and the bridges connected to them https://docs.openstack.org/project-deploy-guide/openstack-ansible/draft/app-config-prod.html11:59
*** thorst_ has joined #openstack-ansible12:00
*** thorst_ has quit IRC12:01
Neptuna this is for a virtualbox install locally12:01
Neptugunix: im just trying to get this right the first time12:02
*** gparaskevas has quit IRC12:02
gunixdo you want prod or test config?12:03
gunixmeaning multiple hosts or just 1 ?12:03
Neptugunix: test config12:03
gunixneptu: https://docs.openstack.org/project-deploy-guide/openstack-ansible/draft/app-config-test.html12:03
Neptugunix: https://docs.openstack.org/project-deploy-guide/openstack-ansible/draft/app-config-test.html12:03
Neptuyes12:03
Neptuim using this one but i donnot understand why you setup vlans12:03
Neptuand why bridges on top of the vlans12:03
*** thorst has quit IRC12:04
gunixi ignored the vlan part, since i am virtualizing everything with KVM on my desktop at home :)12:04
gunixhowever i did configure br-vlan12:04
*** thorst has joined #openstack-ansible12:04
Neptuyes that is where i was going to seems to fency even for test12:04
Neptuauto br-mgmt12:05
Neptuiface br-mgmt inet static12:05
Neptu    bridge_stp off12:05
Neptu    bridge_waitport 012:05
Neptu    bridge_fd 012:05
Neptu    bridge_ports eth0.1012:05
Neptu    address 172.29.236.1112:05
Neptu    netmask 255.255.252.012:05
Neptu    gateway 172.29.236.112:05
Neptu    dns-nameservers 8.8.8.8 8.8.4.412:05
Neptuso you did 3 bridges per node?12:05
gunixNeptu: i had the same feeling about osa at first, but after that i found that this software is used by rackspace to deploy openstack in their private cloud. it has everything ... security is great, is production ready.12:05
gunixNeptu: 4 bridges per node. br-mgmt, br-storage, br-vxlan, br-vlan12:06
Neptugunix: ok ok12:06
*** mrtenio has joined #openstack-ansible12:06
Neptuso ignore the vlan but use the bridges12:06
gunixNeptu: i know OSA doesn't feel like a toy to play with, but it's incredible for prod. it gives you a best practice on how to deploy openstack so you don't need to work 3 months to get there12:07
gunixNeptu: since you are using virtualbox, i doubt you have a layer 2 setup. you probably have everything on one virtual network12:07
Neptui I take a look on your /etc/network/interfaces12:07
Neptui never played that much with nerworking i kind of feel what needs to be done but i just want to be sure12:08
gunixNeptu: pizza is here, brb 30 mins. sorry :D12:08
Neptugunix: hahahaha ok ok12:08
Neptugunix: i will be around just pocke me12:08
gunixNeptu: you should get ready for a ride if you want to do openstack and don't know network. it's far more powerfull than esxi/hyperv/virtualbox etc. openstack is like a race car. other solutions are city cars... openstack is for performance and prod. other stuff is to get a nice confortable ride :D12:09
gunixNeptu: what i did to learn network, is i switched to linux for my home desktop and i virtualize everything with kvm, so i can understand what happens in the background.12:10
*** stek has joined #openstack-ansible12:11
Neptugunix: well i know networking but i never applied it at this level12:15
Neptugunix: so still feel insecure12:15
Neptubut going go so far12:15
*** dhellmann has quit IRC12:15
Neptuwritting down my config files12:15
*** dhellmann has joined #openstack-ansible12:16
Neptugunix: https://pastebin.com/2qLDkama12:19
Neptugunix: based on the test enviroment you will only require 2 bridges looking like this?12:19
Neptusorry 3 bridges on the node 212:20
Neptuthe compute host12:20
gunixback12:27
gunixNeptu: you have gateways on both bridges12:28
gunixthat will confuse the system12:28
*** koukou has quit IRC12:30
gunixNeptu: gateway and dns only on br-mgmt12:30
gunixalso, not sure if this will work, because i have no ideea how you configured virtualbox. do you have a gateway with ip 172.29.236.1 on subnet 22 ?12:31
Neptugunix: im using a 10.0.2.x12:33
Neptugunix: https://pastebin.com/a3Txa0en12:33
mhaydenhappy monday, folks12:34
openstackgerritJean-Philippe Evrard proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-apt_package_pinning stable/ocata: Initial Zuul v3 role jobs  https://review.openstack.org/51427412:34
openstackgerritJean-Philippe Evrard proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-ceph_client stable/ocata: Initial Zuul v3 role jobs  https://review.openstack.org/51427512:34
openstackgerritJean-Philippe Evrard proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-galera_client stable/ocata: Initial Zuul v3 role jobs  https://review.openstack.org/51427612:34
openstackgerritOmer Anson proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-tests master: [WIP]Add tox_base_dir parameter  https://review.openstack.org/51427712:34
openstackgerritJean-Philippe Evrard proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-galera_server stable/ocata: Initial Zuul v3 role jobs  https://review.openstack.org/51427812:34
Neptucheck this config12:34
openstackgerritJean-Philippe Evrard proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-haproxy_server stable/ocata: Initial Zuul v3 role jobs  https://review.openstack.org/51427912:34
openstackgerritJean-Philippe Evrard proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-lxc_container_create stable/ocata: Initial Zuul v3 role jobs  https://review.openstack.org/51428012:34
openstackgerritJean-Philippe Evrard proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-lxc_hosts stable/ocata: Initial Zuul v3 role jobs  https://review.openstack.org/51428112:34
openstackgerritJean-Philippe Evrard proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-memcached_server stable/ocata: Initial Zuul v3 role jobs  https://review.openstack.org/51428212:34
openstackgerritJean-Philippe Evrard proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-openstack_hosts stable/ocata: Initial Zuul v3 role jobs  https://review.openstack.org/51428312:34
openstackgerritJean-Philippe Evrard proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-openstack_openrc stable/ocata: Initial Zuul v3 role jobs  https://review.openstack.org/51428412:34
openstackgerritJean-Philippe Evrard proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_cinder stable/ocata: Initial Zuul v3 role jobs  https://review.openstack.org/51428512:34
Neptugunix: https://pastebin.com/a3Txa0en check if this config could fly or not...12:34
openstackgerritJean-Philippe Evrard proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_glance stable/ocata: Initial Zuul v3 role jobs  https://review.openstack.org/51428612:34
openstackgerritJean-Philippe Evrard proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_heat stable/ocata: Initial Zuul v3 role jobs  https://review.openstack.org/51428712:34
openstackgerritJean-Philippe Evrard proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_horizon stable/ocata: Initial Zuul v3 role jobs  https://review.openstack.org/51428812:34
openstackgerritJean-Philippe Evrard proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_ironic stable/ocata: Initial Zuul v3 role jobs  https://review.openstack.org/51428912:34
openstackgerritJean-Philippe Evrard proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_keystone stable/ocata: Initial Zuul v3 role jobs  https://review.openstack.org/51429012:34
openstackgerritJean-Philippe Evrard proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_nova stable/ocata: Initial Zuul v3 role jobs  https://review.openstack.org/51429112:34
openstackgerritJean-Philippe Evrard proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_rally stable/ocata: Initial Zuul v3 role jobs  https://review.openstack.org/51429212:34
openstackgerritJean-Philippe Evrard proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_sahara stable/ocata: Initial Zuul v3 role jobs  https://review.openstack.org/51429312:34
odyssey4meevrardjp I'm not sure whether to -1 you for the commit msg ;)12:37
odyssey4meand the topic :p12:37
evrardjp... don't tell me.12:37
evrardjpwhat?12:37
evrardjpdarnit!12:37
*** mbuil has joined #openstack-ansible12:37
odyssey4meprevious topic used was zuulv3-jobs-ocata12:38
evrardjpyeah I will rename all that.12:38
odyssey4mecommit message is not < 80 chars wide12:38
evrardjphttps://s-i.huffpost.com/gen/1190184/images/o-SHIIIIT-BUTTON-facebook.jpg12:38
odyssey4meI think it might also be best to have centos be non-voting for ocata, given that it's experimental.12:39
Neptuopenstack ansible does not bother if br-storage is not configured on the infraestructure node??12:40
gunixNeptu: depends on the glance setup12:40
Neptugunix: for the test case at hand its okey then12:40
gunixif glance needs storage, you need br-storage on infra node12:41
*** pcaruana has quit IRC12:41
evrardjpodyssey4me: mmm fair enough on the centos part.12:41
gunixNeptu: i chedk your new config and you still have gateway and dns on all bridges12:41
openstackgerritJean-Philippe Evrard proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_swift stable/ocata: Initial Zuul v3 role jobs  https://review.openstack.org/51429512:41
Neptugunix: so the name of this interfaces are sticky... componets will look for them12:41
openstackgerritJean-Philippe Evrard proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_tempest stable/ocata: Initial Zuul v3 role jobs  https://review.openstack.org/51429612:41
openstackgerritJean-Philippe Evrard proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_trove stable/ocata: Initial Zuul v3 role jobs  https://review.openstack.org/51429712:41
evrardjpoh my batch didn't end12:41
openstackgerritJean-Philippe Evrard proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_watcher stable/ocata: Initial Zuul v3 role jobs  https://review.openstack.org/51429812:41
openstackgerritJean-Philippe Evrard proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_zaqar stable/ocata: Initial Zuul v3 role jobs  https://review.openstack.org/51429912:41
gunixNeptu: yes12:41
openstackgerritJean-Philippe Evrard proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-pip_install stable/ocata: Initial Zuul v3 role jobs  https://review.openstack.org/51430012:41
openstackgerritJean-Philippe Evrard proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-plugins stable/ocata: Initial Zuul v3 role jobs  https://review.openstack.org/51430112:41
openstackgerritJean-Philippe Evrard proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-rabbitmq_server stable/ocata: Initial Zuul v3 role jobs  https://review.openstack.org/51430212:41
openstackgerritJean-Philippe Evrard proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-repo_build stable/ocata: Initial Zuul v3 role jobs  https://review.openstack.org/51430312:41
openstackgerritJean-Philippe Evrard proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-repo_server stable/ocata: Initial Zuul v3 role jobs  https://review.openstack.org/51430412:42
openstackgerritJean-Philippe Evrard proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-rsyslog_client stable/ocata: Initial Zuul v3 role jobs  https://review.openstack.org/51430512:42
openstackgerritJean-Philippe Evrard proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-rsyslog_server stable/ocata: Initial Zuul v3 role jobs  https://review.openstack.org/51430612:42
Neptugunix: I see so then you can set it up on a chipter network or on the interface is the name of that iface that is sticky to openstack12:42
gunixNeptu: what is chipter?12:43
*** gkadam_ has quit IRC12:44
Neptucrypted vpn12:44
Neptubasically you can setup any type of network unter is the name of the interface that it counts12:45
gunixi never tryed that, but i guess you can, yes. maybe odyssey4me knows12:45
Neptui just trying to stablish that is an abstraction12:45
Neptuthe name is the important12:45
Neptuwhat you put under can be 10 ethernet cards12:45
Neptuor anything12:46
gunixwith bonds, yes12:46
Neptuor a vpn12:46
Neptuto another datacenter12:46
Neptuis only looking for the br-storage12:46
gunixyes12:46
Neptummm12:46
Neptuthat sounds good12:46
Neptuok now i have the setup of the network!!12:46
*** yolanda has joined #openstack-ansible12:47
Neptugunix: thanks for tha info i just got me stuck a week :D12:47
gunixNeptu: nice! good luck! keep trying and working if something fails!12:52
gunixcloudnull: i read a bit about veph and i finally understood what you were saying yesterday. well almost all of it. the neutron containers need an additional interface to connect to the br-vlan network. so you just add eth12 to br-vlan and create as a veph, and it's peer is a eth12 interface within the container ... so now the container can connect to the flat network. i got this right ?12:54
gunixs/veph/veth/g12:54
*** vakuznet has quit IRC12:56
*** chyka has joined #openstack-ansible12:57
gunixand as far as i understod correctly, you need veth anyway because one peer can be in the user space of a container, and the other in a bridge. so it connects the container to the bridge without being system wide.12:58
*** chyka has quit IRC13:01
openstackgerritJean-Philippe Evrard proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-apt_package_pinning stable/ocata: Initial Zuul v3 role jobs  https://review.openstack.org/51427413:02
openstackgerritJean-Philippe Evrard proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-galera_client stable/ocata: Initial Zuul v3 role jobs  https://review.openstack.org/51427613:02
openstackgerritJean-Philippe Evrard proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-galera_server stable/ocata: Initial Zuul v3 role jobs  https://review.openstack.org/51427813:02
openstackgerritJean-Philippe Evrard proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-haproxy_server stable/ocata: Initial Zuul v3 role jobs  https://review.openstack.org/51427913:02
openstackgerritJean-Philippe Evrard proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-lxc_container_create stable/ocata: Initial Zuul v3 role jobs  https://review.openstack.org/51428013:02
openstackgerritJean-Philippe Evrard proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-lxc_hosts stable/ocata: Initial Zuul v3 role jobs  https://review.openstack.org/51428113:02
openstackgerritJean-Philippe Evrard proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-memcached_server stable/ocata: Initial Zuul v3 role jobs  https://review.openstack.org/51428213:02
openstackgerritJean-Philippe Evrard proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-openstack_hosts stable/ocata: Initial Zuul v3 role jobs  https://review.openstack.org/51428313:02
openstackgerritJean-Philippe Evrard proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-openstack_openrc stable/ocata: Initial Zuul v3 role jobs  https://review.openstack.org/51428413:02
openstackgerritJean-Philippe Evrard proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_cinder stable/ocata: Initial Zuul v3 role jobs  https://review.openstack.org/51428513:02
openstackgerritJean-Philippe Evrard proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_heat stable/ocata: Initial Zuul v3 role jobs  https://review.openstack.org/51428713:02
openstackgerritJean-Philippe Evrard proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_horizon stable/ocata: Initial Zuul v3 role jobs  https://review.openstack.org/51428813:02
openstackgerritJean-Philippe Evrard proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_ironic stable/ocata: Initial Zuul v3 role jobs  https://review.openstack.org/51428913:02
openstackgerritJean-Philippe Evrard proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_keystone stable/ocata: Initial Zuul v3 role jobs  https://review.openstack.org/51429013:02
openstackgerritJean-Philippe Evrard proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-ceph_client stable/ocata: Initial Zuul v3 role jobs  https://review.openstack.org/51427513:02
openstackgerritJean-Philippe Evrard proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_nova stable/ocata: Initial Zuul v3 role jobs  https://review.openstack.org/51429113:02
openstackgerritJean-Philippe Evrard proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_rally stable/ocata: Initial Zuul v3 role jobs  https://review.openstack.org/51429213:02
openstackgerritJean-Philippe Evrard proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_sahara stable/ocata: Initial Zuul v3 role jobs  https://review.openstack.org/51429313:02
openstackgerritJean-Philippe Evrard proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_swift stable/ocata: Initial Zuul v3 role jobs  https://review.openstack.org/51429513:03
openstackgerritJean-Philippe Evrard proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_tempest stable/ocata: Initial Zuul v3 role jobs  https://review.openstack.org/51429613:03
openstackgerritJean-Philippe Evrard proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_trove stable/ocata: Initial Zuul v3 role jobs  https://review.openstack.org/51429713:03
openstackgerritJean-Philippe Evrard proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_watcher stable/ocata: Initial Zuul v3 role jobs  https://review.openstack.org/51429813:03
openstackgerritJean-Philippe Evrard proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_zaqar stable/ocata: Initial Zuul v3 role jobs  https://review.openstack.org/51429913:03
openstackgerritJean-Philippe Evrard proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-pip_install stable/ocata: Initial Zuul v3 role jobs  https://review.openstack.org/51430013:03
openstackgerritJean-Philippe Evrard proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-plugins stable/ocata: Initial Zuul v3 role jobs  https://review.openstack.org/51430113:03
openstackgerritJean-Philippe Evrard proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-rabbitmq_server stable/ocata: Initial Zuul v3 role jobs  https://review.openstack.org/51430213:03
openstackgerritJean-Philippe Evrard proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-repo_build stable/ocata: Initial Zuul v3 role jobs  https://review.openstack.org/51430313:03
openstackgerritJean-Philippe Evrard proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-repo_server stable/ocata: Initial Zuul v3 role jobs  https://review.openstack.org/51430413:04
openstackgerritJean-Philippe Evrard proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-rsyslog_client stable/ocata: Initial Zuul v3 role jobs  https://review.openstack.org/51430513:04
openstackgerritJean-Philippe Evrard proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-rsyslog_server stable/ocata: Initial Zuul v3 role jobs  https://review.openstack.org/51430613:04
mgariepymorning everyone13:06
Neptuafternoon13:15
openstackgerritJean-Philippe Evrard proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_swift stable/pike: Initial OSA zuul v3 role jobs  https://review.openstack.org/51381313:17
Neptugunix: container_interface: "eth1" that this means?13:24
Neptuon the global overrides13:24
*** mbuil has quit IRC13:25
*** smatzek has quit IRC13:26
*** smatzek has joined #openstack-ansible13:27
*** MeltedLux has quit IRC13:30
*** smatzek has quit IRC13:31
*** MeltedLux has joined #openstack-ansible13:33
*** kylek3h has joined #openstack-ansible13:35
*** yolanda has quit IRC13:43
*** cshen has joined #openstack-ansible13:43
*** rpittau_ has joined #openstack-ansible13:44
openstackgerritMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-haproxy_server stable/pike: Regenerate haproxy.cfg on base config changes  https://review.openstack.org/51379113:44
evrardjpmorning mgariepy13:48
Neptuafter the boostrap i need to manually copy files to /etc/openstack_deploy??13:48
*** dxiri has joined #openstack-ansible13:49
Neptui can only see the ansible_facts folder after executing the boostrap_ansible script13:49
*** hw_wutianwei has joined #openstack-ansible13:50
openstackgerritMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-rsyslog_server master: Remove unified queue from gate pipeline  https://review.openstack.org/51424913:54
openstackgerritMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-ceph_client master: Remove unified queue from gate pipeline  https://review.openstack.org/51420813:54
openstackgerritJean-Philippe Evrard proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_neutron master: Reinstore upgrade testing in Neutron  https://review.openstack.org/51432313:54
*** mbuil has joined #openstack-ansible13:56
openstackgerritJean-Philippe Evrard proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_nova master: [DNM][WIP] Test Nova upstream fixes  https://review.openstack.org/51432413:56
*** jwitko has joined #openstack-ansible13:57
*** yolanda has joined #openstack-ansible13:57
*** esberglu has joined #openstack-ansible13:58
*** hw_wutianwei has quit IRC14:00
*** MeltedLux has quit IRC14:03
gunixNeptu: i think eth1 is the veth interface within the container14:04
gunixNeptu: regarding /etc/openstack_deploy there should be instructons in the tutorial14:04
mgariepywhen will be newton EOL in OSA ?14:09
mgariepyis it too late to push some patches ?14:09
*** smatzek has joined #openstack-ansible14:09
evrardjpdepends where mgariepy14:09
*** smatzek has quit IRC14:10
evrardjpus it's still fine14:10
evrardjptechnically it should have been last week for other projects, but very few have releases yet.14:10
*** smatzek has joined #openstack-ansible14:10
evrardjps/other/upstream/14:10
*** mbuil has quit IRC14:11
*** maybebuggy has quit IRC14:12
*** stek has quit IRC14:13
*** hachi_ has joined #openstack-ansible14:18
*** hw_wutianwei has joined #openstack-ansible14:19
openstackgerritMarc Gariépy (mgariepy) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-rsyslog_client stable/newton: Logrotate not restarting rsyslog  https://review.openstack.org/51433314:19
*** gouthamr has joined #openstack-ansible14:20
*** mbuil has joined #openstack-ansible14:20
*** rodolof has quit IRC14:21
mgariepyit's a pain to chase really old merge :( haha14:23
mgariepyevrardjp, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/494571/14:25
evrardjpmgariepy: could you include testing, like it's done on master?14:25
evrardjpfor the logrotate14:25
*** weezS has joined #openstack-ansible14:25
*** cshen has quit IRC14:25
mgariepyit's not quite complete I need other patches. + probaly testing on OS, 14.04 vs 16.0414:25
mgariepyevrardjp, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/494571/ can we merge this for O ?14:26
mgariepyOcata / xenial need systemctl for sure14:26
*** germs has joined #openstack-ansible14:28
evrardjpmgariepy: I'd say... have a look at the patches that went in for master for the bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/170929114:30
openstackLaunchpad bug 1709291 in openstack-ansible "rsyslog_server: /var/log/log-storage is not synchronized" [Medium,Fix released] - Assigned to Jean-Philippe Evrard (jean-philippe-evrard)14:30
*** nshetty has quit IRC14:30
evrardjpif you want to backport it back, you can propose it, I don't see a problem with it14:30
openstackgerritMaxime Guyot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Add python as an install step for Ubuntu  https://review.openstack.org/51433514:31
mgariepyok perfect.14:33
*** stuartgr has quit IRC14:34
mgariepyevrardjp, why ? https://github.com/openstack/openstack-ansible-rsyslog_client/commit/7b2cd66e972e52e3e3acd0916badd41324d0f43d#diff-e17e7b2ab83078dba9ff699ca786fe47R10014:34
*** mbuil has quit IRC14:35
mgariepyoops. in the test.. sorry14:35
*** Miouge has joined #openstack-ansible14:36
evrardjpprobably worth checking the combined backport14:36
*** yolanda has quit IRC14:36
Miougeevrardjp: thanks for the record quick +2 on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/514335/ :)14:37
evrardjpMiouge: that's easy and it makes sense.14:37
evrardjp:)14:37
evrardjpMiouge: you could probably add the same instructions for centos and suse14:38
evrardjpthat would be great14:38
*** MeltedLux has joined #openstack-ansible14:38
MiougeSure thing14:39
evrardjpthanks14:39
*** stuartgr has joined #openstack-ansible14:39
MiougeI ran into it on Ubuntu 16.04, the version I installed did not ship with python to start with so ansible was not happy14:39
*** chyka has joined #openstack-ansible14:41
*** SmearedBeard has joined #openstack-ansible14:41
mgariepyit's indeed needed, i added the python package to my preseed file when re-installing :)14:42
openstackgerritMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-haproxy_server master: Remove unified queue from gate pipeline  https://review.openstack.org/51421214:47
*** armaan has quit IRC14:48
openstackgerritMaxime Guyot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Add python as an install step  https://review.openstack.org/51433514:48
*** armaan has joined #openstack-ansible14:48
*** mbuil has joined #openstack-ansible14:49
evrardjpMiouge: package names seem good for centos and ubuntu14:51
evrardjpthanks for the patch!14:51
*** br0k3n has quit IRC14:51
*** jvidal has quit IRC14:52
*** MeltedLux has quit IRC14:52
*** hachi_ has quit IRC14:58
*** hachi_ has joined #openstack-ansible14:58
mhaydencloudnull: what's that there link to the rolling upgrade improvements?14:59
cloudnullhttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/513876/14:59
cloudnullthat one14:59
*** Oku_OS is now known as Oku_OS-away15:04
openstackgerritMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-lxc_hosts master: Remove unified queue from gate pipeline  https://review.openstack.org/51421415:07
openstackgerritMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-memcached_server master: Remove unified queue from gate pipeline  https://review.openstack.org/51421515:07
openstackgerritMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-openstack_hosts master: Remove unified queue from gate pipeline  https://review.openstack.org/51421615:07
openstackgerritMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-openstack_openrc master: Remove unified queue from gate pipeline  https://review.openstack.org/51421715:07
mhaydenyay15:07
openstackgerritMarc Gariépy (mgariepy) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-rsyslog_client stable/ocata: Fix postrotate  https://review.openstack.org/51435015:08
MiougeThe doc says “The br-vxlan bridge is required if the environment is configured to allow projects to create virtual networks” but ml2_conf.ini.j2 suggests that we can overwrite tenant_network_types which defaults to “vxlan,flat,vlan” so it should be possible to do tenant networks with vlan (via br-vlan) or vxlan (via br-vxlan), no?15:08
mgariepyMiouge, yes it's possible to use both.15:11
*** hachi_ has quit IRC15:19
*** MeltedLux has joined #openstack-ansible15:23
*** mbuil has quit IRC15:26
openstackgerritMerged openstack/openstack-ansible master: Load nova_console_port from a nova_console inventory item  https://review.openstack.org/50894915:30
openstackgerritMerged openstack/openstack-ansible master: Initial integrated zuulv3 jobs  https://review.openstack.org/51340615:33
openstackgerritMarc Gariépy (mgariepy) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-rsyslog_client stable/newton: Fix postrotate  https://review.openstack.org/51435715:33
*** mrch has quit IRC15:34
*** mma has quit IRC15:37
*** mma has joined #openstack-ansible15:38
openstackgerritMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_aodh master: Remove unified queue from gate pipeline  https://review.openstack.org/51421815:41
openstackgerritMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_barbican master: Remove unified queue from gate pipeline  https://review.openstack.org/51421915:41
*** mma has quit IRC15:42
*** germs has quit IRC15:43
*** germs has joined #openstack-ansible15:43
*** agrebennikov has joined #openstack-ansible15:44
*** MeltedLux has quit IRC15:45
mgariepymhayden, zuulv3 ocata, rsyslog was voting ;)15:46
*** germs has quit IRC15:47
*** MeltedLux has joined #openstack-ansible15:57
openstackgerritMerged openstack/openstack-ansible master: Hyper-converge our container usage  https://review.openstack.org/49939615:58
*** udesale has joined #openstack-ansible15:58
mhaydenmgariepy: ah, sorry!15:59
*** vnogin has quit IRC16:00
mgariepymhayden, no problem ;)16:01
evrardjpit looks like it's time for cleaning up old jobs!16:01
mgariepyhttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/514302/ << rabbitmq not voting on centos ?16:03
mgariepyfor ocata.16:03
*** galstrom_zzz is now known as galstrom16:04
*** wlmbasson_ has joined #openstack-ansible16:05
mgariepyoopie..16:05
mgariepywrong patch haha16:05
evrardjpmgariepy: there are patches that need merging16:05
evrardjphttps://review.openstack.org/#/q/(topic:zuulv3-jobs+OR+topic:zuulv3-jobs-pike+OR+topic:zuulv3-jobs-ocata+OR+topic:zuulv3-jobs-newton)+(status:open)+project:%255Eopenstack/openstack-ansible.*16:06
mgariepyevrardjp, reviewing ocata ones, but most of the patches don't include centos check ;) which was enabled before.16:07
evrardjpmgariepy: I've adapted the jobs to nv due to centos failures.16:07
*** dxiri has quit IRC16:08
*** DanyC has quit IRC16:08
evrardjpthe intent is to bring them back to voting case by case16:08
evrardjpwhen we think they are ready16:08
mgariepythey were all green on centos on except one for now.16:08
*** DanyC has joined #openstack-ansible16:09
*** DanyC has quit IRC16:10
evrardjpocata seems indeed more stable than the others and we've defined them as non-voting vs the other branches that are voting... What irony :)16:10
mgariepylol16:10
mgariepyi can remove my -1 then,16:11
mgariepywe could check in a little while and re-add the voting later.16:11
*** cshen has joined #openstack-ansible16:11
evrardjpI'd love that16:12
evrardjpit was so painful for the upper branches (pike/master), I didn't push my luck for O and N16:12
evrardjpon top of that it was the beginning of centos IIRC on O...16:13
*** cshen has quit IRC16:13
mgariepyok let's merge as-is then, when it's rdy for master we can backport the change ot other release :)16:13
evrardjpoh it's branch per branch16:14
evrardjpI am not sure if we are talking about the same thing anymore16:14
mgariepyhttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/514300/2/zuul.d/project.yaml16:15
mgariepylol16:15
mgariepyon Ocata the latest patch that merged for those repos had centos voting.16:15
openstackgerritKevin Carter (cloudnull) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Improve execution time by using dynamic groups  https://review.openstack.org/51387616:16
evrardjpmgariepy: yes16:17
evrardjpI guess it inherited from master, weirdly.16:17
evrardjpsometimes it doesn't do it so I am wondering how that really works.16:17
evrardjpto be safe, we define each of the project job in tree16:18
evrardjpeach of the repo "pipeline" in tree, in each of the branches16:18
*** wlmbasson_ has quit IRC16:18
evrardjpwe'll discuss that next week at the next community meeting16:18
openstackgerritMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_cinder master: Remove unified queue from gate pipeline  https://review.openstack.org/51422016:26
openstackgerritMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_cloudkitty master: Remove unified queue from gate pipeline  https://review.openstack.org/51422116:26
openstackgerritMajor Hayden proposed openstack/ansible-hardening master: [TEST] Adding scaffolding for extra tasks  https://review.openstack.org/51438516:37
*** udesale has quit IRC16:53
openstackgerritJimmy McCrory proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-haproxy_server stable/ocata: Regenerate haproxy.cfg on base config changes  https://review.openstack.org/51439017:00
openstackgerritJimmy McCrory proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-haproxy_server stable/newton: Regenerate haproxy.cfg on base config changes  https://review.openstack.org/51439117:00
*** dxiri has joined #openstack-ansible17:05
*** DanyC has joined #openstack-ansible17:10
*** wlmbasson_ has joined #openstack-ansible17:14
*** electrofelix has quit IRC17:14
spotzevrardjp: DO we have a head count for Sydney? We need to plan an outing?17:15
xdfilevrardjp:  You may want to discuss the fact that OpenDaylight has a port conflict with the Repo Container. Port 818117:16
xdfilI think ODL is a bit more prominent than OSA repo containers :)17:16
*** weezS has quit IRC17:16
*** pedja has joined #openstack-ansible17:21
*** vnogin has joined #openstack-ansible17:24
cloudnullwe change the port on the repo containers however does that port conflict impact the public api ?17:28
cloudnulldo the agents connect to the odl services directly or through the lb ?17:29
*** DanyC_ has joined #openstack-ansible17:29
*** DanyC has quit IRC17:32
openstackgerritMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_gnocchi master: Remove unified queue from gate pipeline  https://review.openstack.org/51422417:33
wlmbasson_Hi, I'm getting an error when trying to create sahara data processing cluster templates: ConnectFailure: Unable to establish connection to https://192.168.10.161:9001/zones?: HTTPSConnectionPool(host='192.168.10.161', port=9001): Max retries exceeded with url: /zones (Caused by SSLError(SSLError("bad handshake: Error([('SSL routines', 'ssl3_get_server_certificate', 'certificate verify failed')],)",),))17:43
*** germs has joined #openstack-ansible17:44
*** br0k3n has joined #openstack-ansible17:44
wlmbasson_Any ideas? I've tried Ubuntu, CentOS, ocata, pike same error. Everything used to work on ocata and pike. I've tried disabling SSL as far as I can but no luck. I'm running a pike AIO on CentOS.17:45
*** DanyC_ has quit IRC17:48
*** weezS has joined #openstack-ansible17:48
*** germs has quit IRC17:48
openstackgerritMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_ironic master: Remove unified queue from gate pipeline  https://review.openstack.org/51422717:50
*** woodard has joined #openstack-ansible17:50
*** woodard has quit IRC17:50
*** woodard has joined #openstack-ansible17:51
*** kylek3h has quit IRC17:56
*** kylek3h has joined #openstack-ansible17:56
openstackgerritMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_keystone master: Remove unified queue from gate pipeline  https://review.openstack.org/51422917:59
*** poopcat has joined #openstack-ansible18:01
openstackgerritMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_magnum master: Remove unified queue from gate pipeline  https://review.openstack.org/51423018:03
openstackgerritMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_molteniron master: Remove unified queue from gate pipeline  https://review.openstack.org/51423118:03
openstackgerritMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_neutron master: Remove unified queue from gate pipeline  https://review.openstack.org/51423218:03
openstackgerritMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_rally master: Remove unified queue from gate pipeline  https://review.openstack.org/51423418:03
openstackgerritMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_searchlight master: Remove unified queue from gate pipeline  https://review.openstack.org/51423618:03
*** DanyC has joined #openstack-ansible18:09
gunixERROR! A worker was found in a dead state18:09
gunixthis error was funny the first time, but ansible seems to be stuck18:09
gunixanybody here got some similar error?18:09
wlmbasson_Is there a way to globally disable ssl in openstack-ansible?18:09
*** mpranjic has joined #openstack-ansible18:10
*** mpranjic has quit IRC18:10
gunixwlmbasson_: there were some settings to disable ssl for some stuff18:10
gunixi saw it in the examples18:10
*** mpranjic has joined #openstack-ansible18:11
gunixin user_variables.yml, line rabbitmq_use_ssl: false18:12
wlmbasson_@gunix: I've tried everything I can find, but I keep on getting that error. The lines preceding it in horizon.log: DEBUG:keystoneauth.session:REQ: curl -g -i -X GET https://192.168.10.161:9001/zones? -H "User-Agent: python-designateclient-2.7.0" -H "Content-Type: application/json" -H "Accept: application/json" -H "X-Auth-Token: {SHA1}bc36d240fc8d29059a52b4e3aa159ccd12bdf896"18:12
wlmbasson_@gunix: thanks! I'll try that...18:12
gunixwlmbasson_: what error do you get ?18:15
openstackgerritMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-haproxy_server stable/ocata: Regenerate haproxy.cfg on base config changes  https://review.openstack.org/51439018:15
wlmbasson_gunix: when creating a cluster template from the horizon dashboard, I see the plugin selection screen, but when I click next horizon responds with "an error occurred...". In Horizon logs I see the following: DEBUG:keystoneauth.session:REQ: curl -g -i -X GET https://192.168.10.161:9001 -H "Accept: application/json" -H "User-Agent: designateclient keystoneauth1/3.1.0 python-requests/2.18.2 CPython/2.7.5" [Mon Oct 23 18:0618:17
gunixwlmbasson_: did you try to create template via api ?18:18
wlmbasson_DEBUG:urllib3.connectionpool:Starting new HTTPS connection (1): 192.168.10.16118:18
wlmbasson_DEBUG:keystoneauth.session:REQ: curl -g -i -X GET https://192.168.10.161:9001/zones? -H "User-Agent: python-designateclient-2.7.0" -H "Content-Type: application/json" -H "Accept: application/json" -H "X-Auth-Token: {SHA1}bc36d240fc8d29059a52b4e3aa159ccd12bdf896"18:18
gunixyou can use https://bpaste.net/ to paste the logs if youwant :D18:18
wlmbasson_sorry thanks...18:19
wlmbasson_here's the full log from when I click next: https://bpaste.net/show/508d96551d5918:20
*** stuartgr has quit IRC18:20
wlmbasson_gunix: Creating a template via api succeeds, but launching an actual cluster fails18:22
gunixi guess you use sahara?18:22
wlmbasson_gunix: yes18:23
wlmbasson_I haven't traced logs for why the cluster creation fails. Figured it will have something to do with why I can't create cluster templates from the dashboard.18:23
gunixthis i find to be the relevant error:  ConnectFailure: Unable to establish connection to https://192.168.10.161:9001/zones?: HTTPSConnectionPool(host='192.168.10.161', port=9001): Max retries exceeded with url: /zones (Caused by SSLError(SSLError("bad handshake: Error([('SSL routines', 'ssl3_get_server_certificate', 'certificate verify failed')],)",),))18:24
wlmbasson_gunix: yes, sorry I pasted that a while back in the channel18:24
gunixwlmbasson_: i am new to OSA, but from an openstack point of view i would try to manually fix that certificate. however i am not sure how this should be handled with OSA18:26
gunixor manually switch to http18:27
wlmbasson_I'm pretty noob with OpenStack, but what I find interesting is https://192.168.10.161:9001 is my external designate endpoint. On creating node group templates only talk to internal endpoints on 172.29.236.10018:27
gunixcan horizon reach that network?18:27
gunixdo the controller nodes have access to 192.168.10.0/24 ?18:28
wlmbasson_I'm new to OpenStack and OSA. Yes, I access Horizon through that network.18:28
wlmbasson_How do I confirm that the controller nodes have access?18:29
gunixwget18:29
gunix:)18:30
gunixping18:30
wlmbasson_:) it's an AIO build so yes, I can telnet to the designate endpoint from the host and all lxc containers18:31
openstackgerritMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-haproxy_server stable/newton: Regenerate haproxy.cfg on base config changes  https://review.openstack.org/51439118:31
gunixwlmbasson_: i am new to openstack, noob at osa. and right now my computer is running on swap since i am trying to deploy an osa environment to big for my 32 GB desktop :D18:31
*** hw_wutianwei has quit IRC18:31
wlmbasson_gunix: ouch o_018:34
wlmbasson_When I run the curl command manually from the host or the horizon container I get: https://bpaste.net/show/f858212b7695 I think this is the issue. The --insecure argument is not passed.18:35
wlmbasson_rather I guess18:35
wlmbasson_If I do pass insecure I get 40418:36
wlmbasson_gunix: preceding curl statement (before WARNING:keystoneauth.discover:Failed to contact the endpoint at https://192.168.10.161:9001 for discovery.) gives: https://bpaste.net/show/b9dd2760748718:38
*** vnogin has quit IRC18:38
wlmbasson_gunix: so you suggest I should manually fix the certificate in Horizon?18:40
gunixwlmbasson_: did you try with the insecure argument to see it works liek that?18:41
gunixbtw wlmbasson_ it looks like you tried our that command on the server running ansible. not on the controller18:42
*** DanyC has quit IRC18:43
wlmbasson_gunix: when you say controller, do you mean from inside the horizon container?18:44
*** DanyC has joined #openstack-ansible18:44
gunixwlmbasson_: i was thinking from the controller node, and after that from the container too, but i think if it works from the controller, it's ok ...18:47
wlmbasson_gunix: I get the same response from within horizon/keystone/host-machine/sahara. 404 on zones? and https://bpaste.net/show/b9dd27607487 on GET https://192.168.10.161:900118:47
gunixwlmbasson_: try from keystone18:47
wlmbasson_gunix: same18:48
gunixwlmbasson_: was this the link to the full error log: https://bpaste.net/show/508d96551d59 ?18:49
gunixit returns 404 now18:49
gunixi wanted to see exactly on what line python is calling curl and maybe google a bit if this was already reported and fixed on upstream18:49
gunixand maybe there was a push to fix that18:50
wlmbasson_gunix: full error https://bpaste.net/show/42a73fff64e8 I botched the other link18:50
*** SmearedBeard is now known as SmearedBeard-AFK18:50
*** SmearedBeard-AFK is now known as SmearedBeard18:51
*** SmearedBeard is now known as SmearedBeard-AFK18:51
wlmbasson_gunix: do you accept btc? ;)18:51
*** armaan has quit IRC18:52
*** armaan has joined #openstack-ansible18:52
*** vnogin has joined #openstack-ansible18:52
gunixbtc for what? i am trying to help for fun and anyway i am too noob at openstack atm to ask for btc for that.18:52
wlmbasson_emotional support18:54
*** SmearedBeard-AFK has quit IRC18:56
gunixwlmbasson_: i am search google for 2 things: 1. permanently disable cert check on curl. 2. download cert on linux so that it's globally accepted. i will ask this in #ubuntu-server18:56
*** SmearedBeard has joined #openstack-ansible18:57
*** pbandark has quit IRC18:58
wlmbasson_gunix: seems like you can set insecure in ~/.curlrc : https://www.cyberciti.biz/faq/how-to-curl-ignore-ssl-certificate-warnings-command-option/19:00
gunixyes i saw that but you don't know for which user to do that19:00
gunixthere seems to be a --cacert option that downloads the cert and accept it permanently19:00
wlmbasson_I also don't know where to do that -_-19:03
gunixwlmbasson_: https://bpaste.net/show/a850deb0d14819:04
gunixwlmbasson_: the thing is, i have no reason which user runs the commands. if it's the python user or some django user.19:04
gunixi searched google for this error with pike/horizon. nothing. maybe not reported yet, or i am noob19:06
wlmbasson_I also haven't been able to find anything specific to pike/horizon. Hence asking on IRC...19:07
*** SmearedBeard is now known as SmearedBeard-AFK19:10
gunixwlmbasson_: check if endpoints have http or https19:10
gunixand if the answer to http, without https19:10
gunixmaybe you can "hack" the endpoints on openstack level19:11
gunixhttps://docs.openstack.org/sahara/latest/install/installation-guide.html19:11
gunixin the installation guide, the endpoints are without https, only with http19:11
gunixbut that is port 8386, not 9001, so i am confused19:11
wlmbasson_designate endpoints: https://bpaste.net/show/8160447154f319:12
gunixwlmbasson_: well it's secure for public. you should be happy and stop crying about it.19:12
gunixit was a joke. i couldn't help it. sorry19:13
mhaydenlogan-: https://www.eventbrite.com/e/ansible-automates-dallas-registration-38019288716?utm_campaign=Event&utm_source=hs_email&utm_medium=email&utm_content=57651780&_hsenc=p2ANqtz--_oFpFlXJJtMWn0R-70YEzOit_rY8Qj16glbiAMFM4rKpAbEMdGfuNnYCZ8ui9VOpa613EF4Byx9R0Sh3wVAWUNcQ8lg&_hsmi=5765178019:13
wlmbasson_lol19:13
mhaydenlogan-: rather, https://www.eventbrite.com/e/ansible-automates-dallas-registration-3801928871619:13
openstackgerritMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_trove master: Remove unified queue from gate pipeline  https://review.openstack.org/51424019:14
openstackgerritMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_watcher master: Remove unified queue from gate pipeline  https://review.openstack.org/51424119:14
openstackgerritMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_zaqar master: Remove unified queue from gate pipeline  https://review.openstack.org/51424219:14
openstackgerritMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-pip_install master: Remove unified queue from gate pipeline  https://review.openstack.org/51424319:14
openstackgerritMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-plugins master: Remove unified queue from gate pipeline  https://review.openstack.org/51424419:14
*** SmearedBeard-AFK has quit IRC19:14
gunixwlmbasson_: i thought services communicate on the internal endpoint, not on public. strange.19:14
openstackgerritKevin Carter (cloudnull) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Improve execution time by using dynamic groups  https://review.openstack.org/51387619:18
wlmbasson_gunix: do I even need designate? It might just be broken19:18
gunixwlmbasson_: i have no ideea. i was wathing videos online about designate now to get a better picture of what id does19:19
gunixit19:19
*** SmearedBeard has joined #openstack-ansible19:20
openstackgerritMarc Gariépy (mgariepy) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-repo_build stable/ocata: Initial Zuul v3 role jobs  https://review.openstack.org/51430319:22
openstackgerritMarc Gariépy (mgariepy) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-rabbitmq_server stable/ocata: Initial Zuul v3 role jobs  https://review.openstack.org/51430219:24
wlmbasson_gunix: I'm going to test what happens if I never install desginate19:24
*** vnogin has quit IRC19:25
gunixwlmbasson_: i never used it. looks like just some dns service with openstack api19:25
*** woodard has quit IRC19:26
openstackgerritMarc Gariépy (mgariepy) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-repo_server stable/ocata: Initial Zuul v3 role jobs  https://review.openstack.org/51430419:27
openstackgerritMarc Gariépy (mgariepy) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-plugins stable/ocata: Initial Zuul v3 role jobs  https://review.openstack.org/51430119:29
openstackgerritMarc Gariépy (mgariepy) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-pip_install stable/ocata: Initial Zuul v3 role jobs  https://review.openstack.org/51430019:29
openstackgerritMarc Gariépy (mgariepy) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_heat stable/ocata: Initial Zuul v3 role jobs  https://review.openstack.org/51428719:31
openstackgerritMarc Gariépy (mgariepy) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-openstack_openrc stable/ocata: Initial Zuul v3 role jobs  https://review.openstack.org/51428419:31
openstackgerritMarc Gariépy (mgariepy) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-openstack_hosts stable/ocata: Initial Zuul v3 role jobs  https://review.openstack.org/51428319:32
*** hachi_ has joined #openstack-ansible19:33
openstackgerritMarc Gariépy (mgariepy) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-memcached_server stable/ocata: Initial Zuul v3 role jobs  https://review.openstack.org/51428219:34
openstackgerritMarc Gariépy (mgariepy) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-lxc_hosts stable/ocata: Initial Zuul v3 role jobs  https://review.openstack.org/51428119:34
wlmbasson_from #openstack-sahara: https://bpaste.net/show/3579755bfa9119:35
openstackgerritMarc Gariépy (mgariepy) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-haproxy_server stable/ocata: Initial Zuul v3 role jobs  https://review.openstack.org/51427919:36
openstackgerritMarc Gariépy (mgariepy) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-lxc_container_create stable/ocata: Initial Zuul v3 role jobs  https://review.openstack.org/51428019:36
openstackgerritMarc Gariépy (mgariepy) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-galera_client stable/ocata: Initial Zuul v3 role jobs  https://review.openstack.org/51427619:38
*** newmember has quit IRC19:38
openstackgerritMarc Gariépy (mgariepy) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-ceph_client stable/ocata: Initial Zuul v3 role jobs  https://review.openstack.org/51427519:38
openstackgerritMarc Gariépy (mgariepy) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-rsyslog_server stable/ocata: Initial Zuul v3 role jobs  https://review.openstack.org/51430619:39
openstackgerritMarc Gariépy (mgariepy) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-rsyslog_client stable/ocata: Initial Zuul v3 role jobs  https://review.openstack.org/51430519:39
openstackgerritMajor Hayden proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_swift stable/pike: Suppress rsync warnings w/command  https://review.openstack.org/50126319:42
*** germs has joined #openstack-ansible19:44
openstackgerritMajor Hayden proposed openstack/ansible-hardening stable/ocata: Zuulv3 jobs for Ocata  https://review.openstack.org/51444319:47
*** rodolof has joined #openstack-ansible19:47
*** germs has quit IRC19:49
openstackgerritMajor Hayden proposed openstack/ansible-hardening master: Remove Zuulv3 queue and add linters test  https://review.openstack.org/51347519:49
openstackgerritMajor Hayden proposed openstack/ansible-hardening stable/pike: Zuulv3 migration  https://review.openstack.org/51346119:50
openstackgerritMajor Hayden proposed openstack/ansible-hardening stable/newton: Zuulv3 jobs for Newton  https://review.openstack.org/51444419:51
wlmbasson_gunix: from #openstack-sahara: https://bpaste.net/show/3579755bfa91 tried but doesn't help19:54
gunix:(19:54
openstackgerritMarc Gariépy (mgariepy) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-tests stable/ocata: Add voting CentOS.  https://review.openstack.org/51444519:56
gunixi'd help you search, but this is my desktop atm:19:56
gunixgunix@finaldeb:~$ sudo free -m19:56
gunix              total        used        free      shared  buff/cache   available19:56
gunixMem:          32128       30108         793           4        1227        162219:56
gunixSwap:         10239        5331        490819:56
wlmbasson_o_019:57
*** RandomTech has joined #openstack-ansible19:58
openstackgerritMarc Gariépy (mgariepy) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_glance stable/ocata: Add voting CentOS.  https://review.openstack.org/51444619:58
*** vnogin has joined #openstack-ansible20:13
SmearedBeardHey all, is there an easy way to essentially remove openstack? As I mess around with Openstack and osad, Ill like to redeploy afresh (2 node, 1 controll, 1 compute)20:16
evrardjpSmearedBeard: reinstall?20:17
evrardjpSmearedBeard: because you can clean up many things, but you'll still have lxc20:18
evrardjpand a few things on your host20:18
evrardjpif you're using OSA AIO20:18
RandomTechi believe there si an actually clean up script but i dont know were20:18
evrardjpSmearedBeard: but you could use vagrant and it's super isolated20:18
evrardjpthere is a container cleanup script indeed20:18
evrardjpbut it's not everything20:18
RandomTechahh okay20:19
evrardjpto avoid the need of cleanup, use a vm :p20:19
openstackgerritMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_trove stable/ocata: Initial Zuul v3 role jobs  https://review.openstack.org/51429720:21
*** hachi_ has quit IRC20:22
gunixwlmbasson_: if you find the solution please leave me a message. i am curious20:22
wlmbasson_gunix: will do! Trying to run without designate now.20:25
*** smatzek has quit IRC20:27
openstackgerritMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_watcher stable/ocata: Initial Zuul v3 role jobs  https://review.openstack.org/51429820:27
SmearedBeardevrardjp I'm not using AIO, I have 1 node for all controllers, and 1 for compute.. would remove the containers be sufficient? It's changes to the user_vars.yml and openstack_user.yml I am messing around with20:32
evrardjpinstead of re-rolling machines, you could simply cleanup the containers and then delete your /etc/openstack_deploy folder, keeping only what you need20:33
evrardjpyou'd still have a few remnants20:33
evrardjpbut very light20:33
evrardjpon your deploy node20:33
openstackgerritMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-repo_build master: Remove unified queue from gate pipeline  https://review.openstack.org/51424620:34
openstackgerritMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-rsyslog_client master: Remove unified queue from gate pipeline  https://review.openstack.org/51424820:34
evrardjpI don't know what you have and what you're trying to achieve...20:34
evrardjp1 node for all controllers -> 3 vms?20:34
evrardjp3x containers?20:34
RandomTechspotz: you here to help? ^^20:36
spotzRandomTech: Sorta what's up?20:36
RandomTechhe needs help figuring out the best way to completely remove openstack20:36
RandomTechof course my go to would be reimage the system but i only have openstack on it20:37
spotzRandomTech: Yeah that's one of my go tos as well:)20:37
RandomTechevrardjp: is that an option?20:37
SmearedBeardnot completely remove it, but enough to rerun it - I'm OK reimaging it thats is the suggestions20:37
SmearedBeard*if that is the suggestion20:38
RandomTechoops wrong person, sorry SmearedBeard20:38
RandomTechi mixed up people20:38
spotzSmearedBeard: You should be able to re-run the individual plays, I know that's documented20:38
SmearedBeardspotz so I'm trying to understand Neutron and vxlans, vlans, flat networks, providers etc, so I could change my variable file and rerun the neutron play?20:39
evrardjpSmearedBeard: oh always rerun is simple20:39
spotzSmearedBeard: Yeah, in fact there was a conversation about that on channel earlier today I glanced at20:40
evrardjpdelete your containers with the provided playbook, you remove your /etc/openstack_deploy (or keep the conf files), and you can start again20:40
SmearedBeardspotz :( I've no bouncer anymore so can't see it, just my luck :) and evrardjp sounds good to me.. thanks y'all20:40
spotzSmearedBeard: No prob, let me poke up and see if it's scrolled away20:41
evrardjpthat's tedious to redeploy everything though20:41
RandomTechgood luck SmearedBeard20:41
SmearedBeardI will undoubtedly be back again, hopefully one day helping out too20:41
SmearedBeardthanks RandomTech20:41
evrardjpso if it's just for neutron changes, maybe it's worth only killing neutron containers, recreating them, and then doing the neutron playbooks. But that's more precision work. I like the bazooka approach because it works.20:42
spotzyeah it's gone:(20:42
spotzgood luck SmearedBeard!20:42
SmearedBeardno worries, thanks for looking anyway spotz20:43
evrardjpsorry, but there is no "luck" involved! ;)20:44
evrardjpbut enjoy the reroll!20:44
*** armaan has quit IRC20:45
*** armaan has joined #openstack-ansible20:46
*** DanyC has quit IRC20:46
*** woodard has joined #openstack-ansible20:51
openstackgerritMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_cinder stable/ocata: Initial Zuul v3 role jobs  https://review.openstack.org/51428520:54
*** smatzek has joined #openstack-ansible20:56
*** smatzek has quit IRC20:57
*** smatzek has joined #openstack-ansible20:58
*** wlmbasson_ has quit IRC20:59
*** pbandark has joined #openstack-ansible21:00
*** smatzek has quit IRC21:02
*** thorst has quit IRC21:02
*** smatzek has joined #openstack-ansible21:02
*** wlmbasson_ has joined #openstack-ansible21:04
*** smatzek has quit IRC21:07
*** RandomTech has quit IRC21:07
*** wlmbasson has joined #openstack-ansible21:09
*** wlmbasson_ has quit IRC21:14
*** wlmbasson_ has joined #openstack-ansible21:20
*** Miouge has quit IRC21:21
*** thorst has joined #openstack-ansible21:27
*** dave-mccowan has quit IRC21:28
*** jwitko_ has joined #openstack-ansible21:29
*** thorst has quit IRC21:31
*** snowman4839 has quit IRC21:31
*** snowman4839 has joined #openstack-ansible21:31
*** jwitko has quit IRC21:33
*** jwitko has joined #openstack-ansible21:34
*** MasterOfBugs has joined #openstack-ansible21:34
*** pramodrj07 has joined #openstack-ansible21:34
*** jwitko_ has quit IRC21:34
idlemindit's safe to run osa occassionally completely or once it's setup only run select playbooks that require a change?21:35
idlemindlike adding a node, i could edit the inventory and run setup-everything vs running a specific playbook21:35
wlmbassonidlemind: not sure if it's always safe, but I've safely run setup-everything when I make changes to my AIO21:38
*** jwitko has quit IRC21:39
idlemindwlmbasson thx21:39
*** germs has joined #openstack-ansible21:45
*** esberglu has quit IRC21:49
*** germs has quit IRC21:49
*** esberglu has joined #openstack-ansible21:49
*** esberglu_ has joined #openstack-ansible21:51
*** esberglu has quit IRC21:54
*** esberglu_ has quit IRC21:56
*** jwitko has joined #openstack-ansible22:00
*** esberglu has joined #openstack-ansible22:01
*** rodolof has quit IRC22:02
*** pmannidi|AFK has quit IRC22:06
*** br0k3n has quit IRC22:21
*** esberglu has quit IRC22:25
*** snowman4839 has quit IRC22:26
*** snowman4839 has joined #openstack-ansible22:28
*** galstrom is now known as galstrom_zzz22:29
*** pmannidi has joined #openstack-ansible22:31
*** weezS has quit IRC22:32
snowman4839@idlemind: I rerun setup-openstack when I make config changes. Today, I changed from spice to novnc nova consoles and just reran setup-openstack to go through everything even though it really only needed to rerun nova and horizon I believe22:35
*** mma has joined #openstack-ansible22:39
*** chyka has quit IRC22:40
*** chyka has joined #openstack-ansible22:40
*** woodard has quit IRC22:42
*** mma has quit IRC22:43
*** thorst has joined #openstack-ansible22:46
*** dave-mccowan has joined #openstack-ansible22:49
*** thorst has quit IRC22:51
*** woodard has joined #openstack-ansible22:52
*** acormier has joined #openstack-ansible23:04
cloudnullevenings23:06
*** wlmbasson_ has quit IRC23:06
*** acormier has quit IRC23:07
*** snowman48391 has joined #openstack-ansible23:07
*** acormier has joined #openstack-ansible23:07
*** snowman4839 has quit IRC23:08
cloudnullSmearedBeard: to nuke a cloud from orbit, i typically just run `openstack-ansible lxc-container-destroy.yml` then `ansible -m shell -a 'systemctl stop {nova*,cinder*,neutron*,ceilometer*,swift*}' hosts23:12
SmearedBeard(y)23:13
cloudnullthen `ansible -m shell -a 'rm -rf /openstack/*' hosts23:13
cloudnullwith those three things done. you can destory /etc/openstack_deploy if you want23:13
cloudnullor just re-run your deployment.23:13
snowman48391don't the /etc/{nova|glance|cinder|etc} still exist?23:14
cloudnullthey do on hosts, however on redeployment they'll get recreated23:14
cloudnullbut if you want you can remove those too23:14
snowman48391gotcha23:14
cloudnullthen `ansible -m shell -a 'rm -rf /openstack/* /etc/{nova,neutron,swift,ceilometer,glance,cinder}' hosts23:15
*** acormier has quit IRC23:16
*** acormier has joined #openstack-ansible23:17
cloudnulli'd probably not recommend deleting /etc/openstack_deploy, its got your infra setup and, for the most part, is totally portable between releases.23:17
*** duonghq has quit IRC23:18
*** duonghq has joined #openstack-ansible23:18
*** agrebennikov has quit IRC23:19
cloudnullwe've been using the same symantics in the openstack_user_config.yml, conf.d, and env.d for quite a long time23:19
*** acormier has quit IRC23:21
*** dave-mccowan has quit IRC23:27
*** vnogin has quit IRC23:32
*** weezS has joined #openstack-ansible23:33
*** SmearedBeard is now known as SmearedBeard-AFK23:38
*** SmearedBeard-AFK has quit IRC23:42
*** germs has joined #openstack-ansible23:44
*** weezS has quit IRC23:46
*** woodard has quit IRC23:48
*** germs has quit IRC23:49

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!