*** klamath_atx has quit IRC | 00:10 | |
*** klamath_atx has joined #openstack-ansible | 00:13 | |
*** nurdie has joined #openstack-ansible | 00:14 | |
*** nurdie has quit IRC | 00:20 | |
*** cshen has joined #openstack-ansible | 00:55 | |
*** nurdie has joined #openstack-ansible | 00:55 | |
*** klamath_atx has quit IRC | 00:59 | |
*** klamath_atx has joined #openstack-ansible | 01:00 | |
*** cshen has quit IRC | 01:00 | |
*** nurdie has quit IRC | 01:01 | |
*** klamath_atx has quit IRC | 01:06 | |
*** nurdie has joined #openstack-ansible | 01:27 | |
*** nurdie has quit IRC | 01:32 | |
*** spatel has joined #openstack-ansible | 01:37 | |
*** spatel has quit IRC | 01:42 | |
*** macz_ has quit IRC | 02:09 | |
*** tinwood has quit IRC | 02:10 | |
*** tinwood has joined #openstack-ansible | 02:13 | |
*** rh-jelabarre has quit IRC | 02:33 | |
*** nurdie has joined #openstack-ansible | 02:37 | |
*** macz_ has joined #openstack-ansible | 02:39 | |
*** nurdie has quit IRC | 02:41 | |
*** macz_ has quit IRC | 02:45 | |
*** cshen has joined #openstack-ansible | 02:56 | |
*** cshen has quit IRC | 03:00 | |
*** rfolco has quit IRC | 03:14 | |
*** nurdie has joined #openstack-ansible | 04:38 | |
*** nurdie has quit IRC | 04:43 | |
*** cshen has joined #openstack-ansible | 04:56 | |
*** cshen has quit IRC | 05:00 | |
*** gyee has quit IRC | 05:24 | |
*** evrardjp has quit IRC | 05:33 | |
*** evrardjp has joined #openstack-ansible | 05:33 | |
*** tosky has joined #openstack-ansible | 06:24 | |
*** nurdie has joined #openstack-ansible | 06:39 | |
*** nurdie has quit IRC | 06:49 | |
*** cshen has joined #openstack-ansible | 06:55 | |
*** cshen has quit IRC | 07:00 | |
*** miloa has joined #openstack-ansible | 07:03 | |
*** cshen has joined #openstack-ansible | 07:08 | |
*** rpittau|afk is now known as rpittau | 07:20 | |
noonedeadpunk | nsmeds: this bug is really very weird... Especially when you said that you left only single haproxy backend | 07:42 |
---|---|---|
noonedeadpunk | nsmeds: wait, so you deploy haproxy into nspawn? so this is kind of standalone haproxy right? | 07:43 |
noonedeadpunk | I'm wondering if here might be some networking weirdness then... | 07:44 |
noonedeadpunk | any reason not to use default setup of haproxy and keepalived? | 07:46 |
*** pcaruana has joined #openstack-ansible | 07:52 | |
*** jamesgibo has joined #openstack-ansible | 08:04 | |
*** andrewbonney has joined #openstack-ansible | 08:10 | |
*** fanfi has joined #openstack-ansible | 08:17 | |
*** fanfi has quit IRC | 08:28 | |
*** nurdie has joined #openstack-ansible | 08:46 | |
*** nurdie has quit IRC | 08:50 | |
*** CeeMac has joined #openstack-ansible | 08:55 | |
pto | I think I have found a bug. I have no definition of manila in the openstack_user_config.yml or conf.d etc. and the manila-share.service is still deployed (failing). Isn't that a bug? | 09:17 |
*** jawad_axd has joined #openstack-ansible | 09:22 | |
noonedeadpunk | I'm not sure how this is possible, since manila playbook gets run against specific set of hosts, and if they are not defined, play just won't run | 10:10 |
noonedeadpunk | https://opendev.org/openstack/openstack-ansible/src/branch/stable/ussuri/playbooks/os-manila-install.yml#L68 | 10:11 |
openstackgerrit | Dmitriy Rabotyagov (noonedeadpunk) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_barbican master: Clean up barbican.conf https://review.opendev.org/759084 | 10:15 |
openstackgerrit | Dmitriy Rabotyagov (noonedeadpunk) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-ops master: Install virtualenv https://review.opendev.org/741997 | 10:16 |
*** janno has quit IRC | 10:19 | |
admin0 | hi all .. is there a way to map aio bridges to different host interfaces ? | 10:21 |
admin0 | or is it also fine to add interfaces post-install to the bridges created by aio ? | 10:21 |
admin0 | i have 2 extra networks that i want an aio to use to test something | 10:21 |
noonedeadpunk | I think it should be ok to add interfaces post-install | 10:21 |
noonedeadpunk | as we don't really ahve any flexability here https://opendev.org/openstack/openstack-ansible/src/branch/master/tests/roles/bootstrap-host/tasks/prepare_networking.yml#L37-L161 | 10:23 |
admin0 | how to test something like ironic via aio ? | 10:25 |
*** janno has joined #openstack-ansible | 10:27 | |
*** gshippey has joined #openstack-ansible | 10:29 | |
*** cshen has quit IRC | 10:37 | |
*** cshen has joined #openstack-ansible | 10:42 | |
*** nurdie has joined #openstack-ansible | 10:47 | |
*** nurdie has quit IRC | 10:52 | |
*** jawad_axd has quit IRC | 11:01 | |
noonedeadpunk | oh, well, there was some super challenging way but I haven't fully realized it tbh | 11:15 |
pto | noonedeadpunk: I am just testing your patch for mariadb bakcup, and it breaks at the community.mysql.mysql_user - module missing. Should it stay on ansible 2.9 or move to ansible 2.10? | 11:29 |
pto | fatal: [os_infra1_galera_container-2423e74e]: FAILED! => {"reason": "couldn't resolve module/action 'community.mysql.mysql_user'. This often indicates a misspelling, missing collection, or incorrect module path.\n\nThe error appears to be in '/etc/ansible/roles/galera_server/tasks/galera_server_backups.yml': line 66, column 3, but may\nbe elsewhere in the file depending on the exact syntax problem.\n\nThe offen | 11:29 |
pto | ding line appears to be:\n\n\n- name: Grant access to the database for the backup service\n ^ here\n"} | 11:29 |
noonedeadpunk | yah, I'm afraind that indeed this patch is applicable only for 2.10 ansible.... | 11:31 |
*** fanfi has joined #openstack-ansible | 11:31 | |
noonedeadpunk | but I don't think you should upgrade your ansible... | 11:31 |
pto | noonedeadpunk: I agree with that. Any plans to make a 2.9 version? | 11:31 |
noonedeadpunk | not sure what is the good way except backporting patch, but it's really new feature that I'm rather left to decide to the patch owner if it's worth backporting | 11:32 |
noonedeadpunk | probably it worth a backport | 11:33 |
pto | noonedeadpunk: Its a mess that ansible 2.10 is not backward compatible :-/ | 11:33 |
noonedeadpunk | well yes... | 11:34 |
pto | noonedeadpunk: A backport will be nice :-) | 11:34 |
pto | What are the plans to jump to ansible 2.10? | 11:34 |
noonedeadpunk | on V it will b 2.10 | 11:35 |
noonedeadpunk | stable branches will stay where they are | 11:35 |
pto | noonedeadpunk: I think there is an error in the default timer settings: http://paste.openstack.org/show/799986/ | 11:36 |
noonedeadpunk | would be awesome if you could suggest a patch:) | 11:36 |
pto | noonedeadpunk: I would love to, but i might need a little guidance | 11:37 |
noonedeadpunk | oh btw you got some comments on https://review.opendev.org/#/c/760090/ | 11:38 |
*** fanfi has quit IRC | 11:38 | |
*** fanfi has joined #openstack-ansible | 11:52 | |
pto | noonedeadpunk: I have updated the comments on review and updated. Downloaded the git review -d 760090 and updated the core. Done a git commit --amend. How do I push it back to the review correctly? | 11:59 |
*** rfolco has joined #openstack-ansible | 11:59 | |
noonedeadpunk | git review or git review -f :) | 11:59 |
noonedeadpunk | (-f will drop just created branch during -d process) | 12:00 |
pto | noonedeadpunk: Awsome! Thanks | 12:06 |
*** fanfi has quit IRC | 12:09 | |
pto | noonedeadpunk: Your branch and 'gerrit/master' have diverged, and have 1 and 4 different commits each, respectively. Should i do a git pull and merge and commit the change? | 12:11 |
noonedeadpunk | doesn't really matter | 12:16 |
noonedeadpunk | gerrit is capable of merging non-conflicting commits and rebasing them on it's own | 12:17 |
openstackgerrit | PerToft proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Added Netplan examples for a Openstack Infrastructure node. https://review.opendev.org/760090 | 12:35 |
openstackgerrit | PerToft proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Added Netplan examples for a Openstack Infrastructure node. https://review.opendev.org/760090 | 12:37 |
pto | Why does the review not update the changes? They are overwritten when I do a review | 12:38 |
jamesdenton | jrosser do you recall if spatel had to install the centos-release-openstack-{train,ussuri,victoria} repo to get OVS working? | 12:44 |
jrosser | jamesdenton: iirc it was the nfv repo needed to get ovs package with dpdk compiled in | 12:47 |
*** nurdie has joined #openstack-ansible | 12:48 | |
jrosser | I was trying to get him to submit a small patch just for that repo | 12:48 |
jamesdenton | ok, gotcha. i just tried to do an ovs deployment on centos 8 and openvswitch wouldn't install without that repo i mentioned. We should probably add a test for OVS | 12:48 |
jamesdenton | i'll look into again later | 12:48 |
*** jamesgibo has quit IRC | 12:49 | |
noonedeadpunk | pto: not sure what you mean | 12:51 |
noonedeadpunk | pto: oh, so you just updated commit msg... | 12:52 |
noonedeadpunk | so before git commit --amend have you added changes? | 12:52 |
noonedeadpunk | I mean you need to do git add . or smth like this | 12:52 |
noonedeadpunk | and commit --amend only after you staged changes | 12:52 |
*** nurdie has quit IRC | 12:53 | |
pto | noonedeadpunk: I did "git review -d 760090", Made the changes, git add etc/netplan/01-static.yml, git commit --amend, git review | 13:01 |
noonedeadpunk | looks correct | 13:01 |
*** pto has quit IRC | 13:03 | |
*** pto_ has joined #openstack-ansible | 13:03 | |
*** pto_ is now known as pto | 13:03 | |
pto | noonedeadpunk: But no files were chagned. I can try again | 13:04 |
noonedeadpunk | would be interesting to see git status before you amend | 13:04 |
noonedeadpunk | and try checking out to master and removing current branch | 13:04 |
openstackgerrit | PerToft proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Added Netplan examples for a Openstack Infrastructure node. Updated with reviews. https://review.opendev.org/760090 | 13:07 |
*** rh-jelabarre has joined #openstack-ansible | 13:09 | |
*** jamesgibo has joined #openstack-ansible | 13:09 | |
*** rh-jelabarre has quit IRC | 13:13 | |
pto | noonedeadpunk: I did it again, and not its working. Thanks for helping | 13:15 |
*** priteau has joined #openstack-ansible | 13:17 | |
noonedeadpunk | sure, thanks for helping us:) | 13:18 |
*** rh-jelabarre has joined #openstack-ansible | 13:21 | |
*** vakuznet has joined #openstack-ansible | 13:30 | |
pto | noonedeadpunk: Thank you for your awsome work :-) | 13:34 |
pto | Have a nice weekend all | 13:35 |
noonedeadpunk | have a nice weekend as well) | 13:41 |
*** SiavashSardari has joined #openstack-ansible | 13:54 | |
jamesdenton | noonedeadpunk are the zuul parent jobs defined anywhere? i can't recall. example: https://github.com/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_neutron/blob/master/zuul.d/jobs.yaml#L18 | 14:09 |
jamesdenton | n/m i got my answer | 14:09 |
openstackgerrit | James Denton proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_neutron master: Test OVS deployments on CentOS 8 https://review.opendev.org/762661 | 14:12 |
openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/openstack-ansible-tests stable/train: Add requirements_git_install_branch to test-vars https://review.opendev.org/732521 | 14:16 |
*** macz_ has joined #openstack-ansible | 14:17 | |
*** macz_ has quit IRC | 14:22 | |
*** nurdie has joined #openstack-ansible | 14:45 | |
*** rpittau is now known as rpittau|afk | 14:49 | |
openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_barbican master: Trigger uwsgi restart https://review.opendev.org/756686 | 14:57 |
*** nurdie has quit IRC | 15:00 | |
*** spatel has joined #openstack-ansible | 15:02 | |
spatel | ceph question, do you guys have dedicated network for replication? or using br-storage for both client data + replication? | 15:04 |
*** yann-kaelig has joined #openstack-ansible | 15:08 | |
spatel | nevermind i got my answer from my old deployment, i have dedicated network for replication | 15:09 |
*** jamesgibo has quit IRC | 15:10 | |
*** gshippey has quit IRC | 15:19 | |
mgariepy | spatel, depends on your setup, | 15:23 |
mgariepy | my newest deploy have 2x25G bond and i do use 2 separate vlans one for access and one for replication | 15:24 |
mgariepy | my older one has only 2x 10G so i did separate them each on their interface. | 15:25 |
*** yann-kaelig has quit IRC | 15:25 | |
*** nurdie has joined #openstack-ansible | 15:30 | |
ThiagoCMC | Guys, I've never used Manila and I'm interested on it... What services runs within the "manila-data_hosts:" group? I'm seeing that they're being (at the exmple) at the infrastructure hosts but, isn't it kinda of storage? | 15:30 |
*** ianychoi has joined #openstack-ansible | 15:30 | |
*** SiavashSardari has quit IRC | 15:44 | |
openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_keystone master: Shibboleth and OIDC apache modules are co-installable on Focal https://review.opendev.org/758845 | 16:04 |
noonedeadpunk | ThiagoCMC: yeah, it is, it's running manila-share iirc | 16:04 |
noonedeadpunk | well, I know that folks are running manila successfully, but still, role is not finished properly... Like for ganesha nfs storage no HA made (ie balancing) and interfaces are probably not forwarded to the containers.... | 16:05 |
ThiagoCMC | noonedeadpunk, cool! I'm planning to play with CephFS as a Service... =P | 16:09 |
ThiagoCMC | Not interested in NFS | 16:09 |
*** pcaruana has quit IRC | 16:09 | |
noonedeadpunk | well, ganesha-nfs is abstract on ceph mds | 16:10 |
noonedeadpunk | https://docs.ceph.com/en/latest/cephfs/nfs/ | 16:10 |
jamesdenton | jrosser here's that ovs issue i mentioned earlier on centos 8: https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/bab8dcef97684ca68de4611d7e03c8d4. Looks like an additional repo will be needed that ties to the openstack release | 16:10 |
ThiagoCMC | Hmm... Thanks for sharing that! | 16:11 |
ThiagoCMC | noonedeadpunk, my ceph-nfs-install.yml doesn't do anything, is it required for Manila w/ CephFS ? | 16:11 |
noonedeadpunk | yep | 16:12 |
noonedeadpunk | I think it's running when specific hosts are set... | 16:12 |
ThiagoCMC | Ouch! Ok then! lol | 16:12 |
noonedeadpunk | ThiagoCMC: but you can share cephfs directly without nfs as well | 16:12 |
noonedeadpunk | but then you need to ensure that client vms will have storage network iirc | 16:13 |
noonedeadpunk | which is not always possible or prefferable | 16:13 |
ThiagoCMC | Hmmm... Got it | 16:13 |
ThiagoCMC | Yeah, I like my Ceph's cluster network (the one on top of br-storage) to be as isolated as possible! | 16:15 |
ThiagoCMC | My controllers doesn't even have br-storage, it's physically isolated. | 16:16 |
ThiagoCMC | So, I'm wondering about where to deply Manila Share (manila-data_hosts) and the NFS thing... | 16:17 |
ThiagoCMC | Oh, BTW, I gave up on that Erasure Code thing, for now. :-/ | 16:17 |
noonedeadpunk | I guess the same place where cinder-volume is running | 16:19 |
ThiagoCMC | I see... Well, my cinder-volume also doesn't have access to the br-storage network. I'll give it a try! | 16:22 |
openstackgerrit | Dmitriy Rabotyagov (noonedeadpunk) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_barbican master: Updated from OpenStack Ansible Tests https://review.opendev.org/754162 | 16:31 |
openstackgerrit | Dmitriy Rabotyagov (noonedeadpunk) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_barbican master: Cleanup stop handler and barbican_apache_* variables https://review.opendev.org/756689 | 16:33 |
*** macz_ has joined #openstack-ansible | 16:36 | |
openstackgerrit | Dmitriy Rabotyagov (noonedeadpunk) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Add default simple key to secrets https://review.opendev.org/759082 | 16:46 |
*** klamath_atx has joined #openstack-ansible | 16:48 | |
openstackgerrit | Dmitriy Rabotyagov (noonedeadpunk) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_barbican master: Allow multibackend support for Barbican https://review.opendev.org/762691 | 16:51 |
*** klamath_atx has quit IRC | 16:53 | |
ThiagoCMC | I'm seeing that the Charm Deployment support Ceph's Erasure Code, any plans to add this support on OSA as well? | 16:58 |
ThiagoCMC | https://docs.openstack.org/project-deploy-guide/charm-deployment-guide/latest/app-erasure-coding.html | 16:58 |
noonedeadpunk | ThiagoCMC: we just using ceph-ansible. I think they already do support | 16:59 |
noonedeadpunk | but I mean if they do support it - nothing stops from using it in OSA | 17:00 |
ThiagoCMC | But then, the OSA service's configuration doesn't work with the EC pools... I tried to set "rbd default data pool:" under ceph overrride but it didn't work. | 17:01 |
noonedeadpunk | hm... | 17:01 |
noonedeadpunk | I'm not suro how it's special | 17:01 |
noonedeadpunk | I think from osa perspective it's just regular pool | 17:01 |
ThiagoCMC | EC pools doesn't support omap, so, there is a need to tell Ceph clients about the "data_pool"... | 17:02 |
ThiagoCMC | Anyway, today, I can deploy from scratch both OpenStack with Ceph by just running "setup-everything.yml" from my OSA deployment server. It would be awesome to just change a new lines under my /etc/openstack_deploy and make it happen with EC pools too! | 17:03 |
ThiagoCMC | :-P | 17:03 |
noonedeadpunk | but iirc omap limitation is more about supporting pg balancing, but clients can live with it? | 17:03 |
ThiagoCMC | I'm not sure lol | 17:04 |
noonedeadpunk | I just can't find in docs that clients needs special directive.... | 17:05 |
ThiagoCMC | What about this guy here: https://themeanti.me/technology/2018/08/23/ceph_erasure_openstack.html ? | 17:06 |
ThiagoCMC | There is also info about this here: https://www.reddit.com/r/ceph/comments/72yc9m/ceph_openstack_with_ec/ | 17:06 |
ThiagoCMC | And here: http://lists.ceph.com/pipermail/ceph-users-ceph.com/2018-July/027890.html - sorry about flood lol | 17:06 |
noonedeadpunk | well last one is more about ceph-ansible support as I said... | 17:07 |
ThiagoCMC | Yep | 17:07 |
noonedeadpunk | and tbh I have no idea is they support it now or not (I think they should) | 17:07 |
ThiagoCMC | I have no problems in creating/using EC pools outside of OpenStack, with rbd images and with OVERWRITES | 17:08 |
ThiagoCMC | problem is how to configure OpenStack/Ceph clients to make use of the EC pools and "data-pool" properly. | 17:09 |
ThiagoCMC | Anyway, just saying this here that I think it would be awesome to be able to do this via OSA somewhere under /etc/openstack_deploy and let it do its magic! ^_^ | 17:10 |
noonedeadpunk | Hm, that's interesting and I'm wondering why nowhere in docs this neccessity is mentioned... | 17:14 |
noonedeadpunk | as eventually it's not openstack specific then | 17:14 |
noonedeadpunk | the question here is where [client.cinder-ssd] should be in ceph.conf - on mons, on osd hosts, on nova-compute hosts (from where ceph clients connects) | 17:16 |
ThiagoCMC | Exactly! :-D | 17:20 |
noonedeadpunk | ThiagoCMC: so you had replicated meta pool and erasure pool for data right? | 17:25 |
noonedeadpunk | ie both images and images_data? | 17:25 |
ThiagoCMC | Yep! The "images" pool, replicated, and the "images_data" EC. | 17:25 |
noonedeadpunk | uh, it's interesting to play with but no time atm honestly.... | 17:26 |
ThiagoCMC | I've configured the "rbd default data pool = images_data" in glance nodes, its ceph.conf, But, still, Glance failed to upload. | 17:26 |
ThiagoCMC | Oh, no worries! I'm just playing with this in my basement to learn and for fun lol | 17:27 |
*** miloa has quit IRC | 17:27 | |
noonedeadpunk | it sounds like worth going to ceph IRC channel.... | 17:27 |
noonedeadpunk | but really interesting... | 17:28 |
ThiagoCMC | Good call =) | 17:28 |
noonedeadpunk | as not mentioning anything in the docs about this is super weird considering sevral years passed | 17:29 |
ThiagoCMC | True... eheheh | 17:29 |
jamesdenton | noonedeadpunk i think the failure here, for at least the centos distro job, is that neutron-rpc-server may not be running: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/486156/ | 17:30 |
jamesdenton | i don't see the log in the journal list, but don't see any errors on the imp,ementation side | 17:33 |
noonedeadpunk | also ovn timing out instanly is weird... | 17:34 |
noonedeadpunk | things even worse that you can't reproduce it:( | 17:41 |
noonedeadpunk | eventually nothing stops us from contunue using neutron-server binary... | 17:42 |
openstackgerrit | Dmitriy Rabotyagov (noonedeadpunk) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_barbican master: Allow multibackend support for Barbican https://review.opendev.org/762691 | 17:46 |
openstackgerrit | Dmitriy Rabotyagov (noonedeadpunk) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_barbican master: Allow multibackend support for Barbican https://review.opendev.org/762691 | 17:53 |
openstackgerrit | Dmitriy Rabotyagov (noonedeadpunk) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_barbican master: Allow multibackend support for Barbican https://review.opendev.org/762691 | 17:55 |
openstackgerrit | Dmitriy Rabotyagov (noonedeadpunk) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_barbican master: Allow multibackend support for Barbican https://review.opendev.org/762691 | 17:59 |
openstackgerrit | Dmitriy Rabotyagov (noonedeadpunk) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_barbican master: Reduce number of processes on small systems https://review.opendev.org/759895 | 18:03 |
*** klamath_atx has joined #openstack-ansible | 18:12 | |
*** klamath_atx has quit IRC | 18:17 | |
*** klamath_atx has joined #openstack-ansible | 18:28 | |
*** andrewbonney has quit IRC | 18:36 | |
*** gyee has joined #openstack-ansible | 18:54 | |
*** nurdie has quit IRC | 19:22 | |
*** nurdie has joined #openstack-ansible | 19:22 | |
*** nurdie has quit IRC | 19:22 | |
*** nurdie has joined #openstack-ansible | 19:33 | |
*** nurdie has quit IRC | 19:38 | |
openstackgerrit | Dmitriy Rabotyagov (noonedeadpunk) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Add default simple key to secrets https://review.opendev.org/759082 | 20:34 |
openstackgerrit | Dmitriy Rabotyagov (noonedeadpunk) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_barbican master: Clean up barbican.conf https://review.opendev.org/759084 | 20:34 |
noonedeadpunk | can I summon another vote for https://review.opendev.org/#/c/762184/ ? | 21:00 |
mgariepy | done. | 21:04 |
noonedeadpunk | thanks! | 21:07 |
noonedeadpunk | well roles unfreeze would be also great to be voted:) | 21:08 |
noonedeadpunk | https://review.opendev.org/#/c/762185/1 | 21:08 |
mgariepy | haha ok done also. | 21:09 |
*** rfolco has quit IRC | 21:10 | |
*** klamath_atx has quit IRC | 21:13 | |
openstackgerrit | James Denton proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_neutron master: Test OVS deployments on CentOS 8 https://review.opendev.org/762661 | 21:47 |
*** klamath_atx has joined #openstack-ansible | 22:05 | |
*** spatel has quit IRC | 22:07 | |
*** klamath_atx has quit IRC | 22:11 | |
*** klamath_atx has joined #openstack-ansible | 22:11 | |
*** klamath_atx has quit IRC | 22:23 | |
*** vakuznet has quit IRC | 22:35 | |
*** rh-jelabarre has quit IRC | 22:43 | |
*** cshen has quit IRC | 22:43 | |
*** cshen has joined #openstack-ansible | 22:45 | |
*** klamath_atx has joined #openstack-ansible | 22:49 | |
ebbex | o master and removing current branch | 22:50 |
*** klamath_atx has quit IRC | 23:20 | |
*** rfolco has joined #openstack-ansible | 23:22 | |
*** cshen has quit IRC | 23:26 | |
*** rfolco has quit IRC | 23:26 | |
*** klamath_atx has joined #openstack-ansible | 23:33 | |
noonedeadpunk | whaaaaaat?:)) | 23:39 |
*** tosky has quit IRC | 23:43 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.2 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!