Monday, 2020-11-16

*** cshen has joined #openstack-ansible01:07
*** cshen has quit IRC01:12
*** prometheanfire has joined #openstack-ansible01:45
*** macz_ has joined #openstack-ansible02:42
*** macz_ has quit IRC02:46
*** dmsimard has quit IRC02:49
*** mmethot_ has joined #openstack-ansible02:50
*** dmsimard has joined #openstack-ansible02:50
*** mmethot has quit IRC02:53
*** cshen has joined #openstack-ansible03:07
*** cshen has quit IRC03:12
*** cshen has joined #openstack-ansible05:08
*** cshen has quit IRC05:12
*** evrardjp has quit IRC05:33
*** evrardjp has joined #openstack-ansible05:33
*** cp- has quit IRC05:34
*** yasemind has joined #openstack-ansible05:34
*** cp- has joined #openstack-ansible05:40
*** macz_ has joined #openstack-ansible05:46
*** macz_ has quit IRC05:50
*** cp- has quit IRC05:51
*** cp- has joined #openstack-ansible05:56
*** ianychoi_ has joined #openstack-ansible05:57
*** ianychoi has quit IRC06:00
*** pto_ has joined #openstack-ansible06:20
*** cshen has joined #openstack-ansible06:22
*** pto has quit IRC06:22
*** cshen has quit IRC06:26
*** lemko has joined #openstack-ansible06:31
*** lemko2 has quit IRC06:32
*** miloa has joined #openstack-ansible06:33
*** SiavashSardari has joined #openstack-ansible07:06
*** jbadiapa has joined #openstack-ansible07:25
*** rpittau|afk is now known as rpittau07:26
*** lemko0 has joined #openstack-ansible07:29
*** lemko has quit IRC07:30
*** lemko0 is now known as lemko07:30
*** macz_ has joined #openstack-ansible07:34
*** macz_ has quit IRC07:39
openstackgerritDmitriy Rabotyagov (noonedeadpunk) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_cinder stable/ussuri: Set correct permissions for rootwrap.d  https://review.opendev.org/76278907:44
openstackgerritDmitriy Rabotyagov (noonedeadpunk) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_cinder stable/train: Set correct permissions for rootwrap.d  https://review.opendev.org/76279007:44
*** sshnaidm|off is now known as sshnaidm07:46
*** pcaruana has joined #openstack-ansible07:49
*** rpittau is now known as rpittau|bbl07:52
SiavashSardarinoonedeadpunk could you please help me with the openrc role issue?07:53
noonedeadpunkSiavashSardari: do you mean that when you remove service, it will drop endpoint as well?07:53
SiavashSardariyes exactly. I already tested that in my setup07:54
noonedeadpunkhm....07:54
*** cshen has joined #openstack-ansible07:56
noonedeadpunkyeah, you're absolutely right07:57
noonedeadpunkhowever, _service_catalog is independent from _service_endpoints?07:59
noonedeadpunkI mean in general, it doesn't mean it makes sense in specificly cinder role07:59
noonedeadpunkI will try to make proper fix to the collection and then we can use new version I guess08:00
noonedeadpunkbut yeah, agree that your solution makes sense as well, but I'd rather do it on side of the collection08:02
SiavashSardariyeah you're right I didn't know about openstack-ansible-test we should take a look at that and find a solution that works for all projects08:03
noonedeadpunkI mean I guess module makes wrong assuption about what do they recieve here as endpoint. So they should just return changed: false and that;s it08:04
noonedeadpunkhttps://opendev.org/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/src/tag/1.0.0/plugins/modules/endpoint.py#L198-L19908:04
SiavashSardariyeah that's a better approach, and I think there is no validity check in the module as well, I mean what if the endpoint provided here is not a valid endpoint at all?08:09
*** macz_ has joined #openstack-ansible08:12
*** macz_ has quit IRC08:17
SiavashSardarinoonedeadpunk I think the root cause is here https://opendev.org/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/src/tag/1.0.0/plugins/modules/endpoint.py#L161-L16208:17
noonedeadpunkyeah, you;re right.....08:18
noonedeadpunkalready come up to this as well....08:18
noonedeadpunklet me check with folks how do they see it08:19
SiavashSardariok then. if you have the time I would appreciate your input on the openrc role as well.08:20
noonedeadpunkyeah, will try to take a look now08:21
openstackgerritPerToft proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Added Netplan examples for a Openstack Infrastructure node. Updated with reviews.  https://review.opendev.org/76009008:40
noonedeadpunkSiavashSardari: I think issue here is in double not https://review.opendev.org/#/c/762090/2/templates/openrc.j208:47
noonedeadpunkSo by default in openrc you will have `export OS_SYSTEM_SCOPE=all`08:47
noonedeadpunkoh wait08:49
*** andrewbonney has joined #openstack-ansible08:49
*** tosky has joined #openstack-ansible08:49
noonedeadpunkin default value actuall, as you will have `not true`08:49
noonedeadpunksodefault should be false here08:49
noonedeadpunkbut that is barely readable tbh....08:49
noonedeadpunkmaybe it's better just to make 2 templates?08:51
SiavashSardariI know I didn't like that there is too variables, that is not very readable but I couldn't think of anything else08:51
SiavashSardariI wanted to create another template but they will be actually the same08:52
noonedeadpunklet's probably create another tempalte and do iterate on `Create openrc file`08:52
SiavashSardarii mean kinda the same08:52
noonedeadpunkyeah, they will...08:52
noonedeadpunkI'd say we can try using overrides here, but we can't drop keys from config with it08:53
noonedeadpunkso having this complexity vs having 2 simmilar templates - I'd vote for templates08:54
SiavashSardariI used vars but it will not get passed to the actual template. maybe I did it wrong08:54
noonedeadpunkwell it does at the moment and that's why tests are failing08:54
noonedeadpunkthat's what I saw http://paste.openstack.org/show/800041/08:55
noonedeadpunkso solution here would be `{% if not _not_openrc_system_scope | default(false) | bool %}`08:55
SiavashSardariinteresting...08:55
SiavashSardariI tested that in my setup and it worked, why it is not working here??08:56
noonedeadpunkbut imo, we both spent some time to understand it while knowing why we do this, but with some time this might raise great confusion while debugging smth08:56
noonedeadpunkum, I just applied your patch in my sandbox08:57
SiavashSardarianyway if you think adding a new template is a better approach I will post a patch with new teplate08:57
noonedeadpunkwell, we can ask jrosser as well :)08:57
noonedeadpunkI think it's just more simple and more readable approach08:58
SiavashSardariyep I agree, let's wait for his comment on this issue08:59
SiavashSardariI'm ok with a new template as well, it was the first solution that came to my mind too. I just didn't wand to add duplicate (ish) templates09:00
noonedeadpunkYeah, don't like this as well, but have no other ideas tbh as well09:01
SiavashSardarion another matter, we don't have openstack-ansible-ops in opendev? just github?09:03
noonedeadpunkwe have09:04
noonedeadpunkgithub is a mirror of the opendev09:04
openstackgerritDmitriy Rabotyagov (noonedeadpunk) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-openstack_openrc master: Adding support of system scoped openrc and clouds.yaml  https://review.opendev.org/76209009:04
SiavashSardarii'm getting 40409:04
openstackgerritDmitriy Rabotyagov (noonedeadpunk) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-openstack_openrc master: Adding support of system scoped openrc and clouds.yaml  https://review.opendev.org/76209009:05
SiavashSardarithis is the link in docs https://opendev.org/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_ops09:05
noonedeadpunkhttps://opendev.org/openstack/openstack-ansible-ops ?09:05
noonedeadpunkwhere this link is?09:05
SiavashSardarihttps://docs.openstack.org/openstack-ansible-ops/latest/09:06
SiavashSardariwell thanks for the link09:06
openstackgerritDmitriy Rabotyagov (noonedeadpunk) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-ops master: Fix repo link in docs  https://review.opendev.org/76280109:08
*** fanfi has joined #openstack-ansible09:10
SiavashSardarithere are usefull playbooks in https://github.com/openstack/openstack-ansible-ops/tree/master/multi-node-aio/playbooks for service setups such as creating images and flavors and stuff. is there another role or playbook in ops repo that just setup services after OSA setup?09:10
noonedeadpunktbh not sure. and these playbooks are not good maintained or tested, so it's more like general repo for potentially useful stuff for ops09:12
jrossermorning09:13
noonedeadpunko/09:18
noonedeadpunkyour input on https://review.opendev.org/#/c/762090/4 would be great in terms of having 2 openrc templates or this complexity...09:19
jrossernot not :(09:23
SiavashSardarijrosser so no on both approachs?09:45
jrosserwell the not not is not very clear to read09:47
jrosseri was just wondering if the contents of the 'if' were reversed and the _not_ could be removed off the _not_openrc_system_scope09:48
SiavashSardariwell the _not_ is a workaround for two problems: 1. creating two very similar templates. and 2. openrc files use d differently in OSA roles, and despite of system scoped or not, the openrc file should be project scoped (due to project_id in cinder and manila endpoints)09:54
SiavashSardarilast week noonedeadpunk suggested that it's better if we add a system scoped openrc file too09:56
SiavashSardariso we got in this dilemma of how to tackle the two openrc file problem09:57
jrosseri put some comments on the patch09:58
jrosserisnt not _not_openrc_system_scope == openrc_system_scope anyway?09:59
noonedeadpunkit is09:59
noonedeadpunkthe thing here is that we define _not_openrc_system_scope after deployment of openrc09:59
noonedeadpunkbut we could name it _openrc_system_scope surely09:59
jrosserCreate project scoped openrc file -> dest: "{{ openrc_file_dest }}.system_scope"10:03
SiavashSardari I first named it _openrc_system_scope, I thought it will bring more confusion and I added _not '=D10:03
jrosseraaaarrrrhhhh!10:03
noonedeadpunkS yeah, I think maybe having 2 tempaltes is better?:)10:03
jrosseri have no idea whats going on here! :)10:04
jrosserwell yes i see what we want to acheive10:04
jrosserlets just not do it like this :)10:04
noonedeadpunkI think agreed then:)10:04
SiavashSardarioops guys, my bad. I pushed a wrong version.10:05
SiavashSardarilet me post a patch10:05
*** pcaruana has quit IRC10:09
openstackgerritSiavash Sardari proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-openstack_openrc master: Adding support of system scoped openrc and clouds.yaml  https://review.opendev.org/76209010:13
SiavashSardarishould I use recheck for zuul gate failures too?10:16
*** gshippey has joined #openstack-ansible10:17
noonedeadpunkyeah you can do this as well10:20
*** yann-kaelig has joined #openstack-ansible10:26
SiavashSardarinoonedeadpunk about with_items, I like your idea but I don't know how to handle when condition and dest10:28
noonedeadpunkhttps://opendev.org/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_ceilometer/src/branch/master/tasks/ceilometer_post_install.yml#L8210:29
noonedeadpunkjust as a sample10:29
noonedeadpunkand you add key `condition: "{{ openrc_system_scope | bool }}" to the item10:30
openstackgerritDmitriy Rabotyagov (noonedeadpunk) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Bump SHAs for master  https://review.opendev.org/76276210:57
*** jamesgibo has joined #openstack-ansible11:07
openstackgerritPerToft proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Added Netplan examples for a Openstack Infrastructure node. Updated with reviews.  https://review.opendev.org/76009011:13
*** rpittau|bbl is now known as rpittau11:30
openstackgerritSiavash Sardari proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-openstack_openrc master: Adding support of system scoped openrc and clouds.yaml  https://review.opendev.org/76209011:56
openstackgerritMerged openstack/openstack-ansible master: Add neutron missing drivers bump  https://review.opendev.org/76214812:10
*** yann-kaelig has quit IRC12:16
admin0what does openstack_config: true/false do in case of ceph ?12:19
*** rfolco has joined #openstack-ansible12:19
admin0if i want to use an external ceph ( have it not create mons ) , it should be true or false ?12:19
ebbexadmin0: it creates the ceph-pools12:22
admin0what user-variable to set to have it not create mons ?12:22
admin0but use existing ones12:22
admin0please ignore my question12:23
admin0was my mistake ;)12:23
admin0ok .. one more question .. i am on tag 21.1.0 .. new setup .. want to test magnum(kubernetes) .. does anyone have the exact image/command line to deploy a test setup ?  I used the default documents .. and I always end up with timed out on kube_master ( it gets spawned up ) .. but kube minions always fail12:27
admin0i have not been able to get kubernetes working .. i think it could be the image i am work on ( as it requires specific version)12:28
admin0so checking here if anyone is using k8 on osa and can share some notes12:28
openstackgerritDmitriy Rabotyagov (noonedeadpunk) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Unfreeze roles  https://review.opendev.org/76218512:31
openstackgerritDmitriy Rabotyagov (noonedeadpunk) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Unfreeze roles  https://review.opendev.org/76218512:32
ebbexsorry, played around with magnum and fedora-atomic, but never got it to work. from 21.1.0 you should be using fedora-coreos, remember to set 'os_distro: fedora-coreos' as a property on the image.12:32
openstackgerritDmitriy Rabotyagov (noonedeadpunk) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Unfreeze roles  https://review.opendev.org/76218512:32
ebbexNow i just deploy okd4 (openshift) on it. Has a decent installer, creates bootstrap/masters/workers with terraform.12:34
openstackgerritDmitriy Rabotyagov (noonedeadpunk) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Unfreeze roles  https://review.opendev.org/76218512:34
noonedeadpunkwell, we got it working, but I think you might want to bump magnum a bit ahead of the osa, because it might have bugs that have been already fixed in later releases12:36
noonedeadpunkas eventually we were always setting specific magnum version12:36
openstackgerritDmitriy Rabotyagov (noonedeadpunk) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Unfreeze roles  https://review.opendev.org/76218512:38
admin0ebbex, were you able to get it to work with fedora-coreos ?12:41
admin0ebbex, openshift as a service to openstack ?12:41
admin0to -> on ..12:42
ebbexadmin0: yeah, helps if you have octavia.12:53
admin0ebbex, got a howto on osa+octavia ?12:53
ebbexunfortunately not :(12:54
*** yann-kaelig has joined #openstack-ansible12:56
*** rh-jelabarre has joined #openstack-ansible13:01
pto_If i need to run a custom playbook/task in an lxc container, is there an easy way to do it with OSA?13:02
*** pto_ is now known as pto13:04
SiavashSardari@pto just cd to playbooks directory and use ansible command13:05
ptoI need to run it from ansible tower (awx)13:06
SiavashSardariI don't have enough experience with awx, maybe noonedeadpunk can help you13:07
*** damiandabrowski has joined #openstack-ansible13:09
damiandabrowskihi everyone!13:10
noonedeadpunkpto: well I had some experience with AWX, but never tried it with osa. Eventually awx support dynamic inventories, so you can probably pass OSA dynamic_inventory script to awx, but you need to have same deploy host. but not sure how to pass env13:11
ptonoonedeadpunk: Thanks for the advice. I think i will run the play directly from the bare metal host (infra) and interact with the container instead13:11
noonedeadpunkeventaully it would be isnteresting to get awx working with osa13:16
noonedeadpunkas well as with vault :)13:16
noonedeadpunk(I think ppl already using it)13:16
noonedeadpunkadmin0: here's good blog post about osa and octavia https://satishdotpatel.github.io//openstack-ansible-octavia/13:21
noonedeadpunkhttps://developer.rackspace.com/docs/private-cloud/rpc/master/rpc-octavia-internal/octavia-install-guide/ might be also worth reading13:22
*** jamesgibo has quit IRC13:26
*** jamesgibo has joined #openstack-ansible13:32
*** jamesgibo has quit IRC13:32
jrosseradmin0: getting magnum to work is a big task, i wonder if guilhermesp can share a known working config?13:41
*** d34dh0r53 has joined #openstack-ansible13:45
*** tbarron has joined #openstack-ansible13:47
*** SiavashSardari has quit IRC13:49
*** jamesgibo has joined #openstack-ansible13:51
openstackgerritDmitriy Rabotyagov (noonedeadpunk) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_barbican master: Add deployment of the external libraries  https://review.opendev.org/76284213:59
*** cshen has quit IRC14:02
*** spatel has joined #openstack-ansible14:10
admin0noonedeadpunk, thanks for that link .. i am going to give it a try14:11
*** nurdie has joined #openstack-ansible14:25
spateljamesdenton: can you take a look - https://review.opendev.org/#/c/762729/14:25
jamesdentondone14:46
spateljamesdenton: question, related openvswitch package. Finally today victora RDO got release and it has package name rdo-openvswitch-2.13 which support ovs+dpdk14:50
spateldo you think for centOS we should use package name "rdo-openvswitch"  instead of openvswitch?14:50
jamesdentoni don't think so? check this out: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/762661/14:53
spatelwhy do we need to add "centos-release-nfv-openvswitch" repo now?14:56
spatelnow openvswitch-2.13 is already part of default rdo-<release> repo14:56
spateljamesdenton: did i missing something?14:57
jamesdentoni think my patch preceeded the release of 2.13 in the rdo repo14:58
openstackgerritJames Denton proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_neutron master: Test OVS deployments on CentOS 8  https://review.opendev.org/76266115:00
jamesdentonlet try it15:00
spatelhmm15:01
jamesdentonspatel this is the issue I had Friday: v15:01
jamesdentonhttp://paste.openstack.org/show/800059/15:01
*** cshen has joined #openstack-ansible15:02
spatelIn NFV repo package name is openvswitch2.13  so try "dnf install openvswitch2.13"15:03
jamesdentonshould openvswitch not be some sort of alias?15:03
jamesdentoni'd rather not get in to version specific names if we can avoid it15:03
spatelToday rdo announced victoria and they are saying in RDO  repo package name is rdo-openvswitch-2.13  http://mirror.centos.org/centos/8/cloud/x86_64/openstack-victoria/Packages/r/15:03
spatelIf you install rdo-repo and try dnf install rdo-openvswitch then it will up rdo-openvswitch-2.1315:04
spatelBig problem is after centOS 8.2 default openvswitch+dpdk support dropped out and that us why RDO came in picture15:05
openstackgerritMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_neutron master: Remove firewall_driver from securitygoup section due to duplication in agents config file  https://review.opendev.org/76181515:12
*** macz_ has joined #openstack-ansible15:20
*** macz_ has quit IRC15:20
*** macz_ has joined #openstack-ansible15:20
noonedeadpunkversion specific sound like a trouble15:22
noonedeadpunkwe need to indetify latest then unless some specific version is set I guess15:22
spatelnoonedeadpunk: we don't need to stick version into file.15:23
spateljust use "dnf install rdo-openvswitch"15:23
spatellet me run some test and verify in my lab15:26
*** dave-mccowan has joined #openstack-ansible15:34
*** redrobot has quit IRC15:35
spatelnoonedeadpunk: this is what i did, Install fresh CentOS 8 machine and installed  "dnf install centos-release-openstack-victoria"15:38
spatelThen i installed "dnf install rdo-openvswitch"15:38
spateland voila15:38
-spatel- [root@localhost yum.repos.d]# ovs-vswitchd --version15:39
-spatel- ovs-vswitchd (Open vSwitch) 2.13.215:39
-spatel- DPDK 19.11.315:39
*** NewJorg has quit IRC15:39
*** NewJorg has joined #openstack-ansible15:40
spateljamesdenton: noonedeadpunk i don't think we need to mess with any versioning, i found even i do "dnf install openvswitch" its pick up rdo-openvswitch package name so we are good15:44
*** dave-mccowan has quit IRC15:45
spatelwe don't need to do anything there15:45
jamesdentonthat's without the victoria repo?15:45
spatelno15:45
spatelyou have to install victoria repo.15:45
jamesdentonok, i think that's why i chose the centos-release-nfv-openvswitch repo instead15:46
spatelhmm that make sense15:46
jamesdentonhttp://paste.openstack.org/show/800061/15:48
spatelnice!15:49
jamesdentonjust trying to keep it as neutral as possible15:50
openstackgerritJames Denton proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_neutron master: Test OVS deployments on CentOS 8  https://review.opendev.org/76266115:51
*** Guest64097 has joined #openstack-ansible15:51
jamesdentonso that is not addressing the DPDK component directly, simply fixing openvswitch deployment and testing on centos815:51
spatelyes.. we should focus on basic OVS deployment15:52
spatelDPDK would be add-on15:52
jamesdentonyes, i'm sure there are corrections to be made there, too, as you've pointed out15:53
*** Guest64097 is now known as redrobot15:53
spateli have replied you to your comments15:59
admin0Could not find the requested service magnum-api: host  -- does magnum need more than one declaration ?  i have magnum-infra_hosts16:00
jamesdentonthanks spatel.16:01
spateljamesdenton: one more change we need to do for dpdk which is change group = "hugetlbfs" in /etc/libvirt/qemu.conf file. i don't know how to do that with ansible.16:08
spatelqemu group need to run as hugetlbfs to bind dpdk socket with ovs16:08
spatelotherwise you will see permission error in logs16:09
jamesdentonk16:09
jamesdentonhttps://github.com/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_nova/blob/master/templates/qemu.conf.j216:09
jamesdentonmay have to span both playbooks16:10
spatelYes but we need to pass variable in user-variables.yml16:10
spatelor put some condition id dpdk=enabled then go changed qemu.conf permission also16:11
spatels/id/if16:11
spateli wan't sure so i didn't submit patch, lets see what do you think about it16:12
*** jamesdenton has quit IRC16:13
*** jamesdenton has joined #openstack-ansible16:13
jamesdentonspatel we already have 'ovs_dpdk_support: True/False' that can be used. But we also need to consider differences between OSes here. Not sure the same changes apply across the board16:15
spatelThat is why we have variable files for each OS platform to tune it according.16:16
spatelwe have two option changed group permission of OVS from hugetlbfs to qemu or tell other service to use hugetlbfs16:18
*** jamesgibo has quit IRC16:30
*** rpittau is now known as rpittau|afk17:41
fanfifolks, what I need to set (minimum settings) for installing os-magnum service17:50
guilhermesphey there17:52
guilhermespmgnum is an adventure17:52
guilhermespi can share some thoughts tho17:52
guilhermespwhats up admin0 ?17:52
fanfi:)..thx17:52
guilhermespfanfi: magnum is kinda of straight forward to deploy. you just need to define the host inventories for the service and deploy it. The adventure is: using the right coreos image and set the right labels depending on what you are expecting to have on your k8s clusters17:57
guilhermespi can say now that for train, for example, auto healing ( using magnum auto healer and not draino )  is not working with the tags that are set by default17:58
fanfiso it's not usesfull that you expected ?18:00
openstackgerritJonathan Rosser proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Add default simple key to secrets  https://review.opendev.org/75908218:10
admin0guilhermesp, i have magnum setup ( as in the api and containers and the process itself) .. but struggling with the image and the correct syntax to bring it up18:26
admin0like what image to use, what networking overlay etc18:26
admin0issue is it times out on deployment of kube_master ( which at the end deploys) .. but int he stack logs, both kube_master and minions are marked as failed18:26
*** macz_ has quit IRC18:50
*** macz_ has joined #openstack-ansible18:51
*** andrewbonney has quit IRC19:10
*** miloa has quit IRC19:12
guilhermespwhich version are you running admin0 ?19:16
guilhermespand which image? ( fedora-atomic or coreos )19:17
guilhermespfanfi: it is once you get the right combination of labels :)19:17
admin0i used fedora-atomic19:20
admin0but i was suggested to use core-os19:20
guilhermespyep, fedora-atomic is no longer supported19:21
guilhermespwhich magnum version?19:21
guilhermespcoreos uses ignition instead of cloud init19:22
guilhermespi'd suggest to use magnum >=train19:23
guilhermespand switch to coreos19:23
admin0i am on tag 21.1.019:27
admin0not sure which version of magnum it is19:27
admin0and in a new one, tag 21.2.019:27
guilhermespso you should basically be able to run clusters with coreos19:32
admin0do you have the cli commands on exactly how to create it ?19:34
djhankbI've been trying to get magnum working myself, however I'm using Train 20.0.119:34
djhankbIn my scenario, I am running into an issue getting the resources created in Heat, specifically the VM instances, I believe they are bombing out with some sort of authentication issue.19:35
djhankbSounds similar to what admin0 is describing19:38
guilhermesphttps://www.irccloud.com/pastebin/Azc7WEJd/19:40
guilhermespadmin0: tried to keep as simple as i could :)19:40
openstackgerritMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_barbican master: Reduce number of processes on small systems  https://review.opendev.org/75989519:42
*** klamath_atx has joined #openstack-ansible19:43
guilhermespI'd suggest also in case the master is stuck somehow, log into it and check the /var/log/heat-config/* logs and see what failed19:45
*** gshippey has quit IRC19:50
fanfiguilhermesp oki ...i will try to set it up :)  ...thanks for any addition samples commands20:00
admin0guilhermesp, it will take me till today to decode that :)20:07
admin0will try definately20:07
admin0and paste the success/failure tomorrow20:07
guilhermespnice nice20:11
*** macz_ has quit IRC20:18
*** macz_ has joined #openstack-ansible20:19
spatelnoonedeadpunk: look like we got enough votes here - https://review.opendev.org/#/c/762185/20:44
djhankbguilhermesp: Thanks for posting that - I just was testing it out and I am still running into an error: (Using the UI)  Resource CREATE failed: AuthorizationFailure: resources.kube_masters.resources[0].resources.kube-master-bfv: Authorization failed.20:50
djhankbI am not sure if this is an issue with the image, or something else. I've verified that my heat stack works by using the "hello world" HOT file to build a machine20:51
djhankbI feel like I have gotten further than I had before using those Labels that you posted, but still failing on the creation of the kube_master20:52
admin0create in progress going on for 28 minutes  .. is that normal21:01
*** MickyMan77 has joined #openstack-ansible21:02
djhankbadmin0: if you go to heat stacks, you can click on the stack to view progress to see where it is at in the process21:06
guilhermespnot normal admin0 it should be max 10 min. Are you able to login to master and check heat-config logs?21:07
guilhermespmaybe you're hitting docker pull limit rate?21:07
*** hindret has quit IRC21:13
*** hindret has joined #openstack-ansible21:13
MickyMan77Why does openstack add .novalocal to the fqdn hostname and add search domain "openstacklocal novalocal" in the resolve.conf on all my instances ?21:17
MickyMan77Can I change that with some settings like, neutron_dns_domain: "testdomain.local" ?21:18
djhankbMickyMan77: I *think* that's set in user_variables.yml - dhcp_domain: foo.bar.com21:30
MickyMan77thx, i will check that..21:42
*** jbadiapa has quit IRC22:38
*** tosky_ has joined #openstack-ansible22:52
*** tosky is now known as Guest4141922:55
*** tosky_ is now known as tosky22:55
*** Guest41419 has quit IRC22:55
*** cshen has quit IRC22:56
spatelwhat is -undefined- in inventory-manage.py -l ?22:59
*** spatel has quit IRC23:04
*** cshen has joined #openstack-ansible23:52
*** cshen has quit IRC23:57

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.2 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!