Tuesday, 2021-12-07

« Monday, 2021-12-06 Index Wednesday, 2021-12-08 »
opendevreviewDmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_neutron master: Implement uWSGI for neutron-api  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_neutron/+/48615606:02
opendevreviewDmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_neutron master: Update Calico Felix version  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_neutron/+/82065406:05
opendevreviewJonathan Rosser proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_zun master: Move debian testing from buster to bullseye  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_zun/+/82066308:02
opendevreviewJonathan Rosser proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Remove support for debian buster  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/82066408:04
opendevreviewJonathan Rosser proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-tests master: Clean out unused legacy tests  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-tests/+/82066708:31
opendevreviewJonathan Rosser proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_zun master: Remove support for Ubuntu Bionic  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_zun/+/82066908:38
noonedeadpunkjrosser: qdrouterd test would fail I bet... I haven't managed to fix jobs for it during the cycle08:40
jrosseryeah, not surprised08:41
opendevreviewJonathan Rosser proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Remove support for debian buster  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/82066408:41
opendevreviewJonathan Rosser proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Remove support for Ubuntu Bionic  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/82067108:41
opendevreviewJonathan Rosser proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-tests master: Remove unused centos-8 functional job definitions  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-tests/+/82067408:53
noonedeadpunkI guess we will merge that _after_ branching?:)09:12
jrosseroh yes!09:12
jrosserI just got motivated to start cleaning things up09:12
jrosserrather than just add centos-9-stream and have a huge number of jobs09:13
noonedeadpunkyeah, can imagine. I'm waiting to drop buster for quite a while09:13
noonedeadpunkbut we kept pretty good support period for it and bionic tbh09:14
opendevreviewJonathan Rosser proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Remove support for Ubuntu Bionic  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/82067109:16
*** sshnaidm|afk is now known as sshnaidm09:20
opendevreviewJonathan Rosser proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_keystone master: Remove uw_apache functional jobs.  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_keystone/+/82067809:22
opendevreviewJonathan Rosser proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_zun master: Remove testing on Centos-8  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_zun/+/82067909:29
noonedeadpunkwow, qrouterd passed....09:32
opendevreviewJonathan Rosser proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Remove support for Ubuntu Bionic  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/82067109:37
opendevreviewJonathan Rosser proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Remove support for Ubuntu Bionic  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/82067109:39
noonedeadpunkbranching will happen in minutes now09:55
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/ansible-hardening stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-hardening/+/82068310:05
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/ansible-hardening stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-hardening/+/82068410:05
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/ansible-hardening master: Update master for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-hardening/+/82068510:05
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/ansible-role-pki stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-role-pki/+/82068610:05
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/ansible-role-pki stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-role-pki/+/82068710:05
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/ansible-role-pki master: Update master for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-role-pki/+/82068810:05
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/ansible-role-python_venv_build stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-role-python_venv_build/+/82068910:05
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/ansible-role-python_venv_build stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-role-python_venv_build/+/82069010:05
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/ansible-role-python_venv_build master: Update master for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-role-python_venv_build/+/82069110:05
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/ansible-role-systemd_mount stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-role-systemd_mount/+/82069510:05
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/ansible-role-systemd_mount stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-role-systemd_mount/+/82069610:05
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/ansible-role-systemd_mount master: Update master for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-role-systemd_mount/+/82069710:06
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/ansible-role-systemd_networkd stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-role-systemd_networkd/+/82069910:06
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/ansible-role-systemd_networkd stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-role-systemd_networkd/+/82070010:06
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/ansible-role-systemd_networkd master: Update master for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-role-systemd_networkd/+/82070110:06
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/ansible-role-systemd_service stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-role-systemd_service/+/82070210:06
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/ansible-role-systemd_service stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-role-systemd_service/+/82070310:06
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/ansible-role-systemd_service master: Update master for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-role-systemd_service/+/82070410:06
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/ansible-role-uwsgi stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-role-uwsgi/+/82070510:06
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/ansible-role-uwsgi stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-role-uwsgi/+/82070610:06
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/ansible-role-uwsgi master: Update master for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-role-uwsgi/+/82070710:06
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-apt_package_pinning stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-apt_package_pinning/+/82070810:06
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-apt_package_pinning stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-apt_package_pinning/+/82070910:06
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-apt_package_pinning master: Update master for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-apt_package_pinning/+/82071010:06
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-ceph_client stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-ceph_client/+/82071110:06
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-ceph_client stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-ceph_client/+/82071210:06
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-ceph_client master: Update master for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-ceph_client/+/82071310:06
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-galera_server stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-galera_server/+/82071410:06
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-galera_server stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-galera_server/+/82071510:06
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-galera_server master: Update master for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-galera_server/+/82071610:07
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-haproxy_server stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-haproxy_server/+/82071710:07
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-haproxy_server stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-haproxy_server/+/82071810:07
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-haproxy_server master: Update master for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-haproxy_server/+/82071910:07
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-lxc_container_create stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-lxc_container_create/+/82072010:07
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-lxc_container_create stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-lxc_container_create/+/82072110:07
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-lxc_container_create master: Update master for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-lxc_container_create/+/82072210:07
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-lxc_hosts stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-lxc_hosts/+/82072310:07
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-lxc_hosts stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-lxc_hosts/+/82072410:07
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-lxc_hosts master: Update master for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-lxc_hosts/+/82072510:07
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-memcached_server stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-memcached_server/+/82072610:07
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-memcached_server stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-memcached_server/+/82072710:07
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-memcached_server master: Update master for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-memcached_server/+/82072810:07
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-openstack_hosts stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-openstack_hosts/+/82072910:07
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-openstack_hosts stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-openstack_hosts/+/82073010:07
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-openstack_hosts master: Update master for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-openstack_hosts/+/82073110:07
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-openstack_openrc stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-openstack_openrc/+/82073210:07
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-openstack_openrc stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-openstack_openrc/+/82073310:07
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-openstack_openrc master: Update master for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-openstack_openrc/+/82073410:08
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-ops stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-ops/+/82073510:08
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-ops stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-ops/+/82073610:08
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_adjutant stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_adjutant/+/82073710:08
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_adjutant stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_adjutant/+/82073810:08
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_adjutant master: Update master for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_adjutant/+/82073910:08
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_aodh stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_aodh/+/82074010:08
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_aodh stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_aodh/+/82074110:08
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_aodh master: Update master for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_aodh/+/82074210:08
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_barbican stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_barbican/+/82074310:08
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_barbican stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_barbican/+/82074410:08
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_barbican master: Update master for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_barbican/+/82074510:08
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_blazar stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_blazar/+/82074610:08
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_blazar stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_blazar/+/82074710:08
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_blazar master: Update master for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_blazar/+/82074810:08
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_ceilometer stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_ceilometer/+/82074910:08
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_ceilometer stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_ceilometer/+/82075010:08
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_ceilometer master: Update master for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_ceilometer/+/82075110:08
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_cinder stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_cinder/+/82075210:08
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_cinder stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_cinder/+/82075310:09
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_cinder master: Update master for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_cinder/+/82075410:09
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_cloudkitty stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_cloudkitty/+/82075510:09
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_cloudkitty stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_cloudkitty/+/82075610:09
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_cloudkitty master: Update master for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_cloudkitty/+/82075710:09
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_designate stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_designate/+/82075810:09
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_designate stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_designate/+/82075910:09
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_designate master: Update master for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_designate/+/82076010:09
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_glance stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_glance/+/82076110:09
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_glance stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_glance/+/82076210:09
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_glance master: Update master for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_glance/+/82076310:09
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_gnocchi stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_gnocchi/+/82076410:09
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_gnocchi stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_gnocchi/+/82076510:09
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_gnocchi master: Update master for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_gnocchi/+/82076610:09
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_heat stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_heat/+/82076710:10
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_heat stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_heat/+/82076810:10
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_heat master: Update master for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_heat/+/82076910:10
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_horizon stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_horizon/+/82077010:10
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_horizon stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_horizon/+/82077110:10
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_horizon master: Update master for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_horizon/+/82077210:10
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_ironic stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_ironic/+/82077310:11
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_ironic stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_ironic/+/82077410:11
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_ironic master: Update master for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_ironic/+/82077510:11
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_keystone stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_keystone/+/82077610:11
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_keystone stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_keystone/+/82077710:11
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_keystone master: Update master for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_keystone/+/82077810:11
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_magnum stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_magnum/+/82077910:11
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_magnum stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_magnum/+/82078010:11
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_magnum master: Update master for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_magnum/+/82078110:11
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_manila stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_manila/+/82078210:11
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_manila stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_manila/+/82078310:11
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_manila master: Update master for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_manila/+/82078410:11
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_masakari stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_masakari/+/82078510:11
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_masakari stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_masakari/+/82078610:11
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_masakari master: Update master for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_masakari/+/82078710:11
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_mistral stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_mistral/+/82078810:11
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_mistral stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_mistral/+/82078910:11
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_mistral master: Update master for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_mistral/+/82079010:12
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_murano stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_murano/+/82079110:12
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_murano stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_murano/+/82079210:12
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_murano master: Update master for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_murano/+/82079310:12
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_neutron stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_neutron/+/82079410:12
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_neutron stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_neutron/+/82079510:12
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_neutron master: Update master for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_neutron/+/82079610:12
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_nova stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_nova/+/82079710:12
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_nova stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_nova/+/82079810:12
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_nova master: Update master for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_nova/+/82079910:12
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_octavia stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_octavia/+/82080010:12
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_octavia stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_octavia/+/82080110:12
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_octavia master: Update master for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_octavia/+/82080210:12
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_placement stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_placement/+/82080310:12
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_placement stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_placement/+/82080410:12
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_placement master: Update master for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_placement/+/82080510:12
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_rally stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_rally/+/82080610:12
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_rally stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_rally/+/82080710:12
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_rally master: Update master for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_rally/+/82080810:12
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_sahara stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_sahara/+/82080910:13
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_sahara stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_sahara/+/82081010:13
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_sahara master: Update master for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_sahara/+/82081110:13
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_senlin stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_senlin/+/82081210:13
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_senlin stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_senlin/+/82081310:13
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_senlin master: Update master for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_senlin/+/82081410:13
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_swift stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_swift/+/82081510:13
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_swift stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_swift/+/82081610:13
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_swift master: Update master for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_swift/+/82081710:13
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_tacker stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_tacker/+/82081810:13
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_tacker stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_tacker/+/82081910:13
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_tacker master: Update master for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_tacker/+/82082010:13
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_tempest stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_tempest/+/82082110:13
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_tempest stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_tempest/+/82082210:13
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_tempest master: Update master for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_tempest/+/82082310:13
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_trove stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_trove/+/82082410:13
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_trove stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_trove/+/82082510:13
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_trove master: Update master for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_trove/+/82082610:13
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_zun stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_zun/+/82082710:14
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_zun stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_zun/+/82082810:14
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_zun master: Update master for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_zun/+/82082910:14
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-plugins stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-plugins/+/82083010:14
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-plugins stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-plugins/+/82083110:14
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-plugins master: Update master for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-plugins/+/82083210:14
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-rabbitmq_server stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-rabbitmq_server/+/82083310:14
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-rabbitmq_server stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-rabbitmq_server/+/82083410:14
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-rabbitmq_server master: Update master for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-rabbitmq_server/+/82083510:14
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-repo_server stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-repo_server/+/82083610:14
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-repo_server stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-repo_server/+/82083710:14
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-repo_server master: Update master for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-repo_server/+/82083810:15
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-rsyslog_client stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-rsyslog_client/+/82083910:15
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-rsyslog_client stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-rsyslog_client/+/82084010:15
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-rsyslog_client master: Update master for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-rsyslog_client/+/82084110:15
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-rsyslog_server stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-rsyslog_server/+/82084210:15
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-rsyslog_server stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-rsyslog_server/+/82084310:15
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-rsyslog_server master: Update master for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-rsyslog_server/+/82084410:15
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-tests stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-tests/+/82084510:15
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-tests stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-tests/+/82084610:15
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-tests master: Update master for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-tests/+/82084710:15
opendevreviewJonathan Rosser proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Remove support for Ubuntu Bionic  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/82067110:25
noonedeadpunkwell.... I want to fix 2 more things.... ssl for galera fails with debian-start unable to verify cert and clean-up config-template from plugins (tempest blocking this atm)10:32
noonedeadpunkthis is smth we can backport anytime I guess...10:36
kleiniDoes somebody have a list of working NICs for SR-IOV offloading?11:11
opendevreviewOpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_mistral stable/xena: Updated from OpenStack Ansible Tests  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_mistral/+/82085311:20
jrosserkleini: I think you are ok with intel and mellanox, I have no experience with broadcom but there's no reason why it shouldn't work, SRIOV is quite standard11:30
opendevreviewJonathan Rosser proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Remove centos-8 support  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/82085411:34
noonedeadpunkjrosser: what do you think is better regarding mysql SSL - issue certificate for localhost among mysql expected address or disable ssl verification while connecting through socket?11:36
noonedeadpunkI'm close to second option11:37
jrosseroh interesting11:37
noonedeadpunkI'm not sure if cert for localhost is good idea....11:37
jrosserwell that's is kind of odd and sounds like plan for unexpected things being possible11:38
noonedeadpunkyeah...11:38
jrosserI'd not really considered the local socket, is that now TLS as well?11:38
noonedeadpunkwell, `mysql -S /var/run/mysqld/mysqld.sock --ssl --ssl-verify-server-cert -u root -p` errors out with cert issue...11:39
kleinijrosser: thanks11:39
noonedeadpunkand we have it here https://opendev.org/openstack/openstack-ansible-galera_server/src/branch/master/templates/debian.cnf.j2#L711:39
noonedeadpunkI think that probably we could use `ansible_facts['hostname']` as for host and drop socket from there11:40
noonedeadpunkor just galera_address11:40
jrosserdoesn't the permissions affect this11:41
jrosseri.e you can only do bootstrap things as root via the local unix socket11:41
jrosserso we can't change that11:41
noonedeadpunkyes, I think that's true11:41
jrosserand that sounds like a good default to have11:41
noonedeadpunkwe can jsut drop out ssl from there:)11:41
jrosserthere's little gained having cert enforcement on a local unix domain socket11:42
jrosserit is after all local11:42
noonedeadpunkI think that we probably want to switch that to socket as well? https://opendev.org/openstack/openstack-ansible-galera_server/src/branch/master/templates/client.my.cnf.j2#L4-L511:42
jrossermaybe it's a mistake having that in the config file11:42
jrosseras really when we talk about SSL we are meaning on the tcp connection for clients11:43
jrossernot the local socket for bootstrapping11:43
noonedeadpunkI wonder what would happen if user would be dissalowed to login without ssl - would that affect socket as well....11:43
jrosserandrewbonney: did you have a Galera/ssl query too?11:43
jrosserperhaps - I wonder why it breaks11:44
jrosseroh right because the hostname is wrong11:44
noonedeadpunkhttps://mariadb.com/kb/en/securing-connections-for-client-and-server/11:44
andrewbonneyonly around whether we're still aiming to merge https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/807880 before final X, but I assume this is related11:44
noonedeadpunk* https://mariadb.com/kb/en/securing-connections-for-client-and-server/#requiring-tls11:44
noonedeadpunkyeah, that's why I digged into this :)11:45
noonedeadpunkI found the reason and now there're several chairs :D11:45
jrosserwell it says that unix socket is considered secure11:45
noonedeadpunklet me try to enforce admin user SSL11:45
jrosserI think my instinct is that we should not require TLS over the unix socket11:46
jrosseras it's local and only available to the root user11:46
jrosserand if you are local root it's all game over anyway11:47
noonedeadpunkwell....11:49
noonedeadpunkif you `ALTER USER 'admin'@'localhost' REQUIRE SSL;` then auth via socket requires ssl11:49
noonedeadpunkhttps://paste.opendev.org/show/811510/11:53
noonedeadpunkso socket is considered as localhost some kind of?11:54
opendevreviewMerged openstack/ansible-hardening stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-hardening/+/82068312:10
opendevreviewMerged openstack/ansible-hardening stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-hardening/+/82068412:10
opendevreviewMerged openstack/ansible-role-pki stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-role-pki/+/82068612:10
opendevreviewMerged openstack/ansible-role-pki stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-role-pki/+/82068712:10
opendevreviewMerged openstack/ansible-role-systemd_mount stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-role-systemd_mount/+/82069512:10
opendevreviewMerged openstack/ansible-role-systemd_mount stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-role-systemd_mount/+/82069612:10
opendevreviewMerged openstack/ansible-role-systemd_networkd stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-role-systemd_networkd/+/82069912:10
opendevreviewMerged openstack/ansible-role-systemd_networkd stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-role-systemd_networkd/+/82070012:10
opendevreviewMerged openstack/ansible-role-systemd_service stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-role-systemd_service/+/82070212:10
opendevreviewMerged openstack/ansible-role-systemd_service stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-role-systemd_service/+/82070312:10
opendevreviewMerged openstack/ansible-role-uwsgi stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-role-uwsgi/+/82070512:10
opendevreviewMerged openstack/ansible-role-uwsgi stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-role-uwsgi/+/82070612:10
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-apt_package_pinning stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-apt_package_pinning/+/82070812:10
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-apt_package_pinning stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-apt_package_pinning/+/82070912:10
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-ceph_client stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-ceph_client/+/82071112:10
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-ceph_client stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-ceph_client/+/82071212:10
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-galera_server stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-galera_server/+/82071412:10
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-galera_server stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-galera_server/+/82071512:10
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-haproxy_server stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-haproxy_server/+/82071712:10
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-haproxy_server stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-haproxy_server/+/82071812:10
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-lxc_container_create stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-lxc_container_create/+/82072012:10
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-lxc_hosts stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-lxc_hosts/+/82072312:10
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-lxc_hosts stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-lxc_hosts/+/82072412:10
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-memcached_server stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-memcached_server/+/82072612:10
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-memcached_server stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-memcached_server/+/82072712:11
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-openstack_hosts stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-openstack_hosts/+/82072912:11
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-openstack_hosts stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-openstack_hosts/+/82073012:11
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-openstack_openrc stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-openstack_openrc/+/82073212:11
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-openstack_openrc stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-openstack_openrc/+/82073312:11
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-ops stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-ops/+/82073512:11
jrossernoonedeadpunk: yeah it's not totally clear what they mean by @localhost, if that really means the unix socket12:11
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-ops stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-ops/+/82073612:11
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_adjutant stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_adjutant/+/82073712:11
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_adjutant stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_adjutant/+/82073812:11
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_aodh stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_aodh/+/82074012:11
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_aodh stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_aodh/+/82074112:11
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_barbican stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_barbican/+/82074312:11
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_barbican stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_barbican/+/82074412:11
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_blazar stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_blazar/+/82074612:11
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_blazar stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_blazar/+/82074712:11
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_ceilometer stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_ceilometer/+/82074912:11
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_ceilometer stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_ceilometer/+/82075012:11
opendevreviewDmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-galera_server master: Use intermediate chain as ca-cert  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-galera_server/+/82085712:25
opendevreviewDmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Set galera to use TLS for connections by default  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/80788012:25
opendevreviewDmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Set galera to use TLS for connections by default  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/80788012:25
jrosserthat probably needs a releasenote12:26
noonedeadpunkoh, yes12:26
jrosserif anyone takes backups or interacts with the db from outside it will be affected12:27
noonedeadpunkgod call - was trying not to forget, but I did :(12:27
noonedeadpunkUm, I don't think they will12:27
noonedeadpunkas at this point SSL is not a requirement12:27
noonedeadpunkyou still can connect without it12:27
jrosseraaah12:27
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_cinder stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_cinder/+/82075212:27
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_cinder stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_cinder/+/82075312:27
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_cloudkitty stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_cloudkitty/+/82075512:27
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_cloudkitty stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_cloudkitty/+/82075612:27
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_designate stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_designate/+/82075812:27
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_designate stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_designate/+/82075912:28
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_glance stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_glance/+/82076112:28
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_gnocchi stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_gnocchi/+/82076412:28
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_gnocchi stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_gnocchi/+/82076512:28
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_heat stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_heat/+/82076712:28
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_heat stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_heat/+/82076812:28
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_horizon stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_horizon/+/82077012:28
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_horizon stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_horizon/+/82077112:28
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_ironic stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_ironic/+/82077312:28
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_ironic stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_ironic/+/82077412:28
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_keystone stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_keystone/+/82077612:28
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_magnum stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_magnum/+/82077912:28
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_magnum stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_magnum/+/82078012:28
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_manila stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_manila/+/82078212:28
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_manila stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_manila/+/82078312:28
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_masakari stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_masakari/+/82078512:28
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_masakari stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_masakari/+/82078612:28
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_mistral stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_mistral/+/82078812:28
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_mistral stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_mistral/+/82078912:28
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_murano stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_murano/+/82079112:28
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_murano stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_murano/+/82079212:28
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_neutron stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_neutron/+/82079412:28
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_neutron stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_neutron/+/82079512:28
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_nova stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_nova/+/82079712:28
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_nova stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_nova/+/82079812:28
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_octavia stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_octavia/+/82080012:28
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_octavia stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_octavia/+/82080112:28
noonedeadpunkor not....12:29
* noonedeadpunk checking for sure12:29
jrosserwell, I'd expect a socket to be kind of TLS or not12:30
jrosserit's an outer wrapper of sorts isn't it?12:30
noonedeadpunkyeah, seems like that12:33
noonedeadpunkI was under impression that without providing --ssl or --ssl-ca it would fail12:34
noonedeadpunkbut it just silently connects with SSL12:34
mgariepygood morning.12:34
noonedeadpunk\o/12:34
mgariepyso. uwsgi and neutron ?12:34
mgariepyor you guys did find the issue ?12:34
noonedeadpunknope...12:34
noonedeadpunkI guess it's time to go to #neutron for that :D12:35
noonedeadpunk* #openstack-neutron12:35
mgariepywhat are the specs for the ci nodes?12:35
noonedeadpunk8gb, 4cores, 100gb disk afaik12:35
mgariepy8g of ram ? or 15 ?12:35
noonedeadpunkit's not oom though12:35
noonedeadpunkas according to ps and ss uwsgi continue to listen on port12:36
noonedeadpunkit jsut does not respond12:36
noonedeadpunkor, well, it stopps responding at some point12:36
jrossermgariepy: if you look at the irc from last night there were some links to haproxy log where the neutron backend just stops12:37
jrosserlike somehow it's all deadlocked / waiting for ova / gone for lunch / .... and doesn't respond to the LB healthcheck12:38
jrosser*waiting for ovn12:38
noonedeadpunkwell `[14:40] <ralonsoh> noonedeadpunk, there is, uwsgi is still not supported`12:41
mgariepylast recheck almost pass.12:41
noonedeadpunkso we can jsut relax and leave this patch for next several years....12:42
mgariepyonly openstack-ansible-deploy-aio_metal-centos-8-stream FAILED>12:42
noonedeadpunkyes, but it does use non-uwsgi for calico/ovn12:42
noonedeadpunkdamn it, just by mistake reseted to master proxysql which dropped all progress (ノಠ益ಠ)ノ彡┻━┻12:43
mgariepytime to use your zfs auto-snapshot ?12:44
mgariepy;p12:44
noonedeadpunkhaha, yes12:46
jrosserhrrm we are going to need some triple help on the os_tempest Xena job12:57
jrosser`Could not find or access '/home/zuul/workspace/.quickstart/config/release/tripleo-ci/CentOS-8/xena.yml' on the Ansible Controller.`12:57
jrosserodyssey4me: ^ do you know who can help with this?12:58
noonedeadpunkhm, they haven't released yet? or they decided to skip release at all?12:58
noonedeadpunkarxcruz: ^ ?12:59
arxcruznoonedeadpunk: checking 12:59
jrosserthere is weirdness too, because on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_tempest/+/820821/ it's only running the triple jobs but no OSA ones13:00
opendevreviewDmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Set galera to use TLS for connections by default  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/80788013:00
jrosserlooks like some job filtering is missing there13:00
noonedeadpunkyeah, we filter out .gitreview changes13:00
opendevreviewDmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_tempest master: Use config_template as a collection  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_tempest/+/81987613:03
noonedeadpunkI wonder if tempest just pass on master right now13:03
noonedeadpunkmgariepy: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/191235913:06
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_rally stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_rally/+/82080613:09
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_rally stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_rally/+/82080713:09
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_sahara stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_sahara/+/82080913:09
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_sahara stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_sahara/+/82081013:09
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_senlin stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_senlin/+/82081213:09
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_senlin stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_senlin/+/82081313:09
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_swift stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_swift/+/82081513:09
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_swift stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_swift/+/82081613:09
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_tacker stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_tacker/+/82081813:09
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_tacker stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_tacker/+/82081913:09
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_trove stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_trove/+/82082413:09
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_trove stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_trove/+/82082513:09
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_zun stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_zun/+/82082713:09
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_zun stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_zun/+/82082813:09
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-plugins stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-plugins/+/82083013:09
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-plugins stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-plugins/+/82083113:09
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-rabbitmq_server stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-rabbitmq_server/+/82083313:09
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-rabbitmq_server stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-rabbitmq_server/+/82083413:09
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-repo_server stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-repo_server/+/82083613:09
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-repo_server stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-repo_server/+/82083713:09
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-rsyslog_client stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-rsyslog_client/+/82083913:09
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-rsyslog_client stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-rsyslog_client/+/82084013:09
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-rsyslog_server stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-rsyslog_server/+/82084213:09
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-rsyslog_server stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-rsyslog_server/+/82084313:09
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-tests stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-tests/+/82084513:09
opendevreviewDmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-galera_server master: [DNM] Test TLS with infra test  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-galera_server/+/82086113:12
mgariepysubscribed.13:12
mgariepythank noonedeadpunk 13:12
arxcruznoonedeadpunk: ysandeep can help you, but i think for now we don't have xena jobs, so it might be better to skip tripleo jobs on xena for now 13:13
noonedeadpunkdo you have plans to release xena?13:14
ysandeepnoonedeadpunk, hi, Tripleo have moved to independent release, we will not release xena for tripleo13:14
ysandeepyou can drop those tripleo jobs from your layout for xena branch.13:15
ysandeepnoonedeadpunk, fyi.. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-specs/+/801512 13:17
noonedeadpunkyeah I can recall reading some ML but didn't know where it ended up13:17
opendevreviewDmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_tempest stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_tempest/+/82082113:21
opendevreviewDmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_tempest stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_tempest/+/82082213:21
noonedeadpunkI think we would need second vote for https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_tempest/+/820821/2 as it's not plain bot patch13:22
noonedeadpunkysandeep: can you probably help me out with https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ansible/+/820140? So it's failing with couldn't resolve module/action 'openstack.config_template.config_template' https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/db8615b1f516456593e0a42869fe7fa7/log/logs/undercloud/home/zuul/overcloud_deploy.log#194513:27
noonedeadpunkbut I thought that it should be enough to have https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ansible/+/820140/2/tripleo_ansible/requirements.yml ?13:27
noonedeadpunkI'm not really an expert in TripleO layering and if these requirements are applied for under and upper clouds...13:28
ysandeepnoonedeadpunk, will check in few, sry in a mtg13:29
noonedeadpunksure, not urgent!13:29
ysandeepsshnaidm, ^^ i think you will be able to answer that better than me13:32
sshnaidmnoonedeadpunk, hey13:34
noonedeadpunko/13:34
sshnaidmnoonedeadpunk, is it required for tempest tests in CI only?13:34
noonedeadpunkUm, according to log config_template is used for overcloud deploy.13:35
sshnaidmnoonedeadpunk, I see...13:35
noonedeadpunkeventually the goal is to remove complexity which is brought by installing that module as plugin13:36
sshnaidmnoonedeadpunk, it's not easy, we'll need to talk :) probably we couldn't use this collection13:36
noonedeadpunkas you need to define ENV vars to make it work13:36
noonedeadpunkwell, right now it's used just as a module. in repo we just changed sym-linking to make it work both ways13:37
noonedeadpunkbut that's kind of nasty I believe13:37
sshnaidmnoonedeadpunk, for tripleo we use a specific set of collections only, and most likely we couldn't add another one, keeping in mind we move from ansible13:37
noonedeadpunkah13:37
sshnaidmnoonedeadpunk, so I don't think we can use it inside tripleo13:38
sshnaidmalthough we can use it in CI if need, since it's still ansible based13:38
noonedeadpunkBut you can continue using https://opendev.org/openstack/tripleo-ansible/src/branch/master/tripleo_ansible/ansible-role-requirements.yml#L26-L32 ?13:39
noonedeadpunkconsidering it's exactly same code?13:39
noonedeadpunkI'm not sure it makes sense to me, but ok13:39
sshnaidmnoonedeadpunk, this file is for CI and local checks only, we don't use it in "actual" tripleo13:39
sshnaidmnoonedeadpunk, collections in tripleo are packaged as RPMs and installed as any other packages13:40
sshnaidmonly those count13:40
noonedeadpunkok, let me re-phrase - I have no idea where this module is currently used in tripleo )13:40
noonedeadpunkmy concern is that we want to use collection in os_tempest13:40
noonedeadpunkand not break things for you13:41
sshnaidmos_tempest is not part of tripleo, this is part of CI, so it's easier13:41
sshnaidmnoonedeadpunk, and in CI we can add collections, lemme find for you..13:41
sshnaidmnoonedeadpunk, https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ci/+/818820  and  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart/+/81879413:42
sshnaidmthose are 2 places where we need to add collection if we use it in CI13:42
sshnaidmthen I suppose we could use os_tempest with collection13:43
sshnaidmnoonedeadpunk, wrt config_template - lemme do some research where it's used and how, and I'll get back to you13:45
noonedeadpunkoh, well13:45
noonedeadpunkI think I will ease my life and make tempest jsut compatible both ways with adjusting meta13:46
sshnaidmnoonedeadpunk, if it's possible, then would be great13:47
noonedeadpunkI bet this should work https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_tempest/+/819876/4/meta/main.yml13:48
sshnaidmnot sure what it does13:49
noonedeadpunkeventually it should instruct ansible to lookup for a collection and fallback to a module13:50
noonedeadpunkin order not to add namespace and collection name13:50
sshnaidmyeah, worth test13:51
noonedeadpunkhttps://docs.ansible.com/ansible/latest/user_guide/collections_using.html#simplifying-module-names-with-the-collections-keyword13:51
noonedeadpunkfeels like zuul died :(14:02
odyssey4mejrosser I see you found arxcruz :)14:25
jrosserodyssey4me: yes we understand whats happening now14:33
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_placement stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_placement/+/82080314:45
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_placement stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_placement/+/82080414:45
* jrosser boots a centos-9 vm. why do I do this to myself? :/14:45
*** dviroel is now known as dviroel|lunch14:50
noonedeadpunk≋≋≋≋≋̯̫⌧̯̫(ˆ•̮ ̮•ˆ) 14:55
*** odyssey4me is now known as Guest786614:59
admin1setup infra fails on the end at utility container  on Get list of repo packages http://172.29.236.9:8181/constraints/upper_constraints_210c8eac0df141191be4e5256543fc12c1893d94.txt    tag 23.1.2 14:59
admin1known issue ? 14:59
noonedeadpunkI think you need to re-run repo_server role14:59
noonedeadpunkif you do some kind of upgrade15:00
noonedeadpunk#startmeeting openstack_ansible_meeting15:01
opendevmeetMeeting started Tue Dec  7 15:01:09 2021 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is noonedeadpunk. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.15:01
opendevmeetUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.15:01
opendevmeetThe meeting name has been set to 'openstack_ansible_meeting'15:01
noonedeadpunk#topic rollcall15:01
noonedeadpunko/15:01
damiandabrowski[m]hey!15:01
admin1\o 15:01
mgariepyhalf here ! 15:01
jrossero/ hello15:02
noonedeadpunk#topic office hours15:02
noonedeadpunkso, we have branched today, but some zuul jobs got stuck 15:03
noonedeadpunkIt feels like they could get resetted and we might need to recheck some of them15:03
noonedeadpunkI wonder what to do with post pipeline though...15:04
noonedeadpunkWhat I'd love to get before release - enable TLS for galera and drop config_template from modules15:05
noonedeadpunkThese are basically 2 patches that could be backported and hopefully will just pass15:05
noonedeadpunkWe also about to move U to EM state once https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/820604 merge15:06
noonedeadpunkjrosser: has already started a cleanup of ubuntu bionic and debian 10. I think we should also just drop jobs for non-stream centos 8. Not sure if that has been pushed or not...15:07
jrosseryes I pushed that as well15:07
jrossersooooo tempted to follow up with dropping distro install jobs too15:08
noonedeadpunkWe probably should backport that to previous branches?15:08
noonedeadpunkbtw we have pretty fresh bug report for them https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/195079815:08
noonedeadpunkso seems ppl use them :p15:08
jrossermaybe we just remove the zuul jobs there, as people might still fight on with centos-815:08
noonedeadpunkyeah, I was thinking about jsut removing CI checks for 815:09
noonedeadpunkas this is last thing I want to fight for15:09
jrosserah right - my patch for master is total removal, not just the CI15:09
noonedeadpunkah, ok15:09
jrosserI can rework that though to make a backportable part for the CI15:09
noonedeadpunkUm, you haven't cleaned jobs in https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/82085415:10
noonedeadpunkI'd say that we should jsut split zuul changes in a backportable thing...15:11
noonedeadpunkbut we can make specific patch for stable as well15:11
noonedeadpunkor can leave it at all and drop when they start failing...15:12
noonedeadpunkJust in case - let's not merge these cleanup patches until we branch integrated repo15:12
noonedeadpunkit would be really bad if we do....15:13
jrosseroh the bionic and lentos removal is a bit mixed up15:14
jrosserI will fix that15:14
jrosser*centos15:14
noonedeadpunkah, indeed, I see now15:15
jrosser`dnf search python3-virtualenv`15:17
jrosser`No matches found.`15:17
noonedeadpunkdoh15:17
noonedeadpunkcentos 9?15:17
jrosserwell that's not got very far at all :)15:17
jrosseryeah15:17
noonedeadpunkepel?15:17
noonedeadpunkor it's supposed to be python3-venv?15:18
mgariepyor only python since 2.x is over now..15:18
jrosserwell this works `python3 -m venv foo`15:18
noonedeadpunkum, and what mirrors are there? see no 9-stream here http://mirror.centos.org/centos/15:19
jrosserthere was talk of this in the infra channel, I think somehow the mirror structure is changed, but I have no idea yet how15:20
noonedeadpunkI guess we should have moved from virtualenv for several years now.... I'm surprised it still worked tbh15:20
noonedeadpunkand what is set in yum.repos.d?15:21
noonedeadpunkI really hope it's not rdo structure of repos....15:21
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible stable/victoria: Bump OpenStack-Ansible Victoria  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/82054715:22
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible stable/wallaby: Bump OpenStack-Ansible Wallaby  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/82052915:22
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible stable/ussuri: Bump OpenStack-Ansible Ussuri  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/82060415:22
noonedeadpunkoh, zuul got unstuck15:22
jrosserstuff like metalink=https://mirrors.centos.org/metalink?repo=centos-baseos-$stream&arch=$basearch&protocol=https,http15:22
noonedeadpunkok, it's rdo way...15:22
jrosseragain this comes to the question of who maintains centos and disto installs, as none of the regular contributors are using any of this15:24
noonedeadpunkwell tbh distro didn't take any of our time for last $n cycles?15:24
jrosserand kolla drop distro installs on account of not having enough effort15:24
noonedeadpunkyeah, centos distro is broken, but spatel pushed fix for them15:25
jrossernot really, it's just more surface area15:25
noonedeadpunkregarding centos I dunno...15:26
noonedeadpunkinner part of me really wish to drop it....15:27
spatelif you guys think we should keep centos around then i can put some hours.. 15:27
jrosserlikewise, but here I am booting a vm :(15:27
noonedeadpunkis it good for project? don't think so15:27
spatelnow i am also moving away from centos so little hard to keep up 15:27
noonedeadpunkI was going to boot right after release as well15:28
noonedeadpunkbut since you already done that :P15:28
jrosserI can't get git-review to work15:29
jrosseras usual its totally unclear if a make a stupid mistake with keys or something, or it really doesn't work15:29
noonedeadpunkum, I saw ML that new git-review doesn't work against gerrit15:29
noonedeadpunk`git-review broken by git version 2.34.0`15:30
noonedeadpunkhttp://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-November/025817.html15:31
noonedeadpunkit might be smth shipped with stream-9?15:31
noonedeadpunkbleeding edge?15:31
noonedeadpunkthis days I feel myself old tbh, as I start being nostalgic about days that passed....15:32
spatellol15:32
noonedeadpunkwith old structured repos, virtualenv, etc...15:32
*** ysandeep is now known as ysandeep|dinner15:34
noonedeadpunkI have some feeling that centos 9 distro would be easier to make working then source....15:34
spatelYes RDO make that much easier 15:35
noonedeadpunkif only they already have packages built for it hehe15:37
spatelRDO is very active community and even tripleO also using them to build. 15:38
spatelwe can't completely drop centos/stream from OSA (because its kind of popular distro) 15:39
noonedeadpunkyeah, I tend to agree here, despite I don't really like this 15:39
spatelif source is hard to keep up then we can keep distro version around 15:41
noonedeadpunkI don't want to diverge 15:41
noonedeadpunkLike ubuntu = source, centos = distro15:41
noonedeadpunkthat's really bad...15:41
spatelthen only option left to keep it both kind 15:42
spatelI believe big reason for centos mess is transition from centos7 --> centos8 --> stream 15:43
noonedeadpunkI'd say it;s centos itself :)15:43
spatelwe should remove all centos stuff and just stay on centos stream 9 15:43
noonedeadpunkas with any new release they bring breaking changes that are not workaroundable15:44
noonedeadpunkand change policies too fast15:44
spatelagreed but that is what we have to deal with. 15:44
spatelI love Rocky Linux which is really 100% alternative of centos 15:44
noonedeadpunklike btrfs, whole stream thing, not publishing libs for all supported bython versions - like having py3.8 but not having libselinux for it15:45
spatel+1 15:45
noonedeadpunkand I'm not sure that Rocky has smth different wrt these points15:45
spatelso what should we do now? 15:47
noonedeadpunkstruggle I believe15:48
noonedeadpunklet's see what it comes with el915:48
spatelbut we don't have EL9 CI job right?15:48
noonedeadpunkno we don't now15:49
spateli will try to install centos stream 9 and see how it goes 15:51
noonedeadpunkjrosser: already does that just in case15:51
spatelgood to know :) 15:52
jrosserlol https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/9/Everything/x86_64/Packages/15:52
jrosserI know not to waste my time any further now15:52
spatellol /Everything/  15:53
spatelmay be their repos are not in sync yet.. 15:54
noonedeadpunkjrosser: epel now uses metalinks as well....15:57
noonedeadpunklike metalink=https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=epel-$releasever&arch=$basearch&infra=$infra&content=$contentdir15:57
noonedeadpunkso I have no idea how to look through packages....15:57
noonedeadpunkDNF should be able to list packages from specific repo15:58
noonedeadpunkAnd on that terrible disappointment...15:59
noonedeadpunk#endmeeting15:59
opendevmeetMeeting ended Tue Dec  7 15:59:27 2021 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)15:59
opendevmeetMinutes:        https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/openstack_ansible_meeting/2021/openstack_ansible_meeting.2021-12-07-15.01.html15:59
opendevmeetMinutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/openstack_ansible_meeting/2021/openstack_ansible_meeting.2021-12-07-15.01.txt15:59
opendevmeetLog:            https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/openstack_ansible_meeting/2021/openstack_ansible_meeting.2021-12-07-15.01.log.html15:59
noonedeadpunkI believe that lurking through repos is not disclosing packages that are present there now16:00
spatelmay be 9 just recently came out and still some work need to be done.. that is why repos are broken16:02
noonedeadpunkI don't think they are borken - I'd say it's as designed16:03
noonedeadpunkeventually comes in the line with CDing repos16:03
noonedeadpunkyou can check rdo structure and it's like that for quite a while16:04
jrosserI installed it with the official command and I get this https://paste.opendev.org/show/811517/16:04
noonedeadpunkoh, huh16:04
noonedeadpunkwell...16:05
mgariepyit's a start !16:05
noonedeadpunkworth to return back to centos 9 in several month then....16:05
jrosseryep, no need to rush as you can't bootstrap the AIO without systemd_networkd16:06
noonedeadpunkum, they aim to replace systemd overall with smth or I don't understand smth?16:07
jrosserwe need networkd out of epel16:07
jrosseror else we play networkmanager16:07
jrosserand rewrite everything for centos16:08
noonedeadpunknah, thanks16:08
jrosserit's just completely not provided in normal centos16:08
noonedeadpunkyeah I see they dropped it in 8?16:09
admin1what ansible run adds 8181 endpoint in haproxy ? the reason i got the error i figured out is that the repo server has a diff ip and the haproxy has a diff ip for the backend 16:09
noonedeadpunkalong with btrfs16:09
jrosseryes, we already had to patch it before16:09
noonedeadpunkadmin1: repo server16:09
noonedeadpunkah, and added with aproxy-install.yml16:09
noonedeadpunk*haproxy-install.yml16:10
jrosserand IP address is an inventory thing, so that needs kind of major event to change the IP of the repo server16:10
*** dviroel|lunch is now known as dviroel16:10
*** ysandeep|dinner is now known as ysandeep16:10
jrosserit shouldn't just change16:10
noonedeadpunkand it's also persistant due to openstack_ips.json16:10
jrosseradmin1: have you done some sort of cleanup/reinstall?16:11
admin1i am going to do the cleanup and remove all the files except the user-config and variables and retry again 16:11
spatelhow do i export application credential from A cloud to B cloud?  16:14
noonedeadpunkI don't think you can do this, except configure federation for keystone16:15
spatelI have engineering openstack running on centos which i am going to nuke it and rebuilding with ubunut - Folks asking can you preserve App creds ?16:15
admin1why not backup and take the whole db there ? 16:16
noonedeadpunkwell, if you preserve database and fernet keys - yes16:16
admin1and then setup osa . and then delete the unneeded projects and users16:16
noonedeadpunkor you can migrate to ubuntu by dropping one controller first16:16
spateli am going to upgrade that openstack which is running on stein so i don't think taking full DB backup and restore on wallaby would be good idea16:17
spatelmy big issue is upgrade and mixing version would be hard16:18
opendevreviewDmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-galera_server master: Use intermediate chain as ca-cert  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-galera_server/+/82085716:19
spatelin worst case i can tell engineering to re-create keys.. :(16:19
noonedeadpunkwell keystone hasn't changed that much I believe16:20
noonedeadpunkand you can run db-migrate anytime...16:20
spatelhmm 16:20
spatelI am thinking i can take backup of just keystone db and import into newer cluster16:22
spatelhow do i run just db migrate for specific role by hand ? 16:23
jrosserit doesn't sound too unreasonable to have to use a different application credential against another deployment16:23
jrosseryou should be rotating those anyway :)16:23
spatel:) you know how lazy people are 16:24
opendevreviewDmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-galera_server master: [DNM] Test TLS with infra test  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-galera_server/+/82086116:24
spatelthey just want to do terraform apply"16:24
spatelanyway its not deal breaker so let them deal with it 16:25
noonedeadpunkwhat a mess we have in horizon role....16:52
admin18181 not being added to haproxy.cfg .. 17:07
admin1strange .. 17:07
admin1is there any specific tag or way to tell add 8181 repo entry to haproxy ? 17:16
noonedeadpunkum, you could define that with extra services ofc, but that's wrong wau of doing that17:17
noonedeadpunkif haproxy does not have endpoint, it feels like you have some issues with inventory17:17
noonedeadpunkas it's hwo haproxy decides to add or not to add backend17:17
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-lxc_container_create stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-lxc_container_create/+/82072117:25
admin1inventroy shows  c1_repo_container-e271e4c5           | None     | pkg_repo                | c1            | None           | 172.29.239.89  | None .. but that ip or the 8181 is no where in haproxy 17:26
admin1and then setup utiliy fails coz it tries to contact 8181: and download the files 17:26
admin1grep haproxy repo-install.yml  . returns nothing 17:27
admin1maybe changing repo_server_port: 8181  to a new port might force it to add it 17:29
jrosserif the config is wrong in haproxy then there is really no point going any further17:29
noonedeadpunkI hope that is not exact grep command :)17:29
admin1the issue is , the whole repo block is missing in haproxy 17:29
admin1if it was wrong, i plan to manually fix and move ahead 17:29
noonedeadpunkcheck this https://opendev.org/openstack/openstack-ansible/src/branch/master/inventory/group_vars/haproxy/haproxy.yml#L445-L45517:30
noonedeadpunkcondition to get service is to have some hosts in repo_all group17:30
noonedeadpunkthat is eventually the file where all services are defined17:30
jrosseradmin1: the repo_install playbook doesn't do anything with haproxy17:31
admin1i am going to rm -rf /etc/haproxy from the controllers and see if it recreates 17:32
jrosseradmin1: the haproxy-install.yml playbook does everything for setting up haproxy, including configuring the backends by reading what the inventory says17:32
jrosserthat is why we keep suggesting that there is a problem with the inventory17:32
admin1i kept only user-secrets, user-variables and user-config before running setup hosts 17:33
jrosserso to take a really simple example from what noonedeadpunk posted, if the 'repo_all' group is empty, you will not get any repo servers configured in haproxy17:33
admin1how to validate if the inventory is good  or bad ? 17:34
jrosseryou could debug the variables, print the value of groups['repo_all']17:35
jrosserand if you look at the code of the haproxy role then you'll see that each service gets a config fragment created in /etc/haproxy/conf.d17:36
jrosserwhich are then all assembled together into haproxy.cfg17:36
jrosserso you have plenty of things you can try to debug where things have / have not happened17:36
admin1i had a haproxy_service_configs: override where i am adding ceph grw endpoints for object storage .. i removed that and it worked 17:39
admin1maybe something changed in this new tag .. 17:39
noonedeadpunkyou must not override 17:39
noonedeadpunkhaproxy_service_configs17:39
admin1how to add an extra ? 17:40
admin1https://docs.openstack.org/openstack-ansible-haproxy_server/latest/  .. this shows how to add 17:40
noonedeadpunkwith haproxy_extra_services17:40
noonedeadpunkhttps://opendev.org/openstack/openstack-ansible/src/branch/master/releasenotes/notes/haproxy-extra-configs-67a77803494d3e97.yaml17:41
jrosseradmin1: no - that is documentation for how to use the haproxy role17:41
jrosseropenstack-ansible uses the haproxy role, and feeds in a giant data structure there already17:41
admin1oh 17:41
admin1any example of this anywhere ? haproxy_extra_services ? 17:41
jrosserthe release notes, and the code I guess https://opendev.org/openstack/openstack-ansible/src/branch/master/playbooks/haproxy-install.yml#L5217:42
noonedeadpunkfor example https://docs.openstack.org/openstack-ansible/latest/user/security/index.html#letsencrypt-certificates17:43
jrosserthere so many things you can override, and something like this lives at the playbook level so does not have a natural home in a role defaults/main.yml17:43
admin1i see it .. many thanks 17:43
admin1all is clear 17:43
jrosserquick way to find how this works is codesearch17:44
jrosseryou found the variable in haproxy defaults/main.yml17:44
noonedeadpunkWe should have it documented for rgw as well somewhere...17:44
jrosserso the next thing to do is see how it is used, or if it is available to overrride17:44
jrosserhttps://codesearch.opendev.org/?q=haproxy_extra_services17:44
jrosseryes we are missing documentation for external rgw entriely17:45
jrosseradmin1: why do you need to do this?17:46
jrosserlook at the code here https://github.com/openstack/openstack-ansible/blob/master/inventory/group_vars/haproxy/haproxy.yml#L8717:46
jrosserit takes the hosts in the group ceph-rgw if you use OSA to deploy ceph, or the hosts in ceph_rgws if you deploy an external rgw17:47
jrosserthere should be no need for an override at all17:47
noonedeadpunkoh, yes, if release is new enbough you can jsut change haproxy_ceph_rgw_service as well17:47
admin1i am using an external ceph 17:47
jrosseradmin1: yes, I understand this17:47
jrosserand there is a variable caph_rgws where you specify your external rgw, just like you do with ceph_mons for external mons17:47
noonedeadpunkjrosser: we totally should document that17:48
noonedeadpunkas I just realized we have this lol17:48
jrosseryeah, it's all there17:48
jrosser:)17:48
jrosserthis is actually much simpler than it might be17:48
admin1i did not knew  the ceph_rgws group 17:49
admin1makes it so easier 17:49
noonedeadpunkit's not grroup, it's just simple list in variables17:49
admin1is it ip:port pair ? 17:49
admin1or fqdn:port pair 17:49
noonedeadpunk[ip1,ip2,ip3]17:50
admin1codesearching examples .. 17:50
noonedeadpunkport is expected to be as defined by `radosgw_service_port`17:50
jrosseryeah looking at our stuff we run a completely separate haproxy for rgw17:52
jrosserbecause the traffic there is >>>>> bigger than the API stuff17:52
noonedeadpunkwe're about to do the same17:52
jrosserif I was doing it again I would probably look at ecmp and make it active/active rather than failover with keepalived17:54
noonedeadpunkwell, folks dream about anycast but I doubt we will manage to make it17:58
jrossernoonedeadpunk: the reason we added that variable to make extra certs with the PKI role is that you need an extra one for the internal vip of your rgw lb17:58
noonedeadpunkah, so it's really new17:59
jrosserotherwise horizon doesn't work as its expecting that vip to validate SSL properly17:59
noonedeadpunkyeah. fair17:59
jrosserand it's "outside" the deployment, anyway just a tip that you can use user_pki_certificates_<blah> to make extra certs for things like that18:00
jrosserthough I think we are already enabling a bunch of internal ssl that's not on by default, so maybe not everyone runs into this18:01
noonedeadpunkI read James Gibson doc regarding that but I still not sure I got how it works...18:01
jrosserah yes, that's kind of only for things we have merged so far18:02
noonedeadpunkwell we cover internal connection for keystone with ssl as well18:02
jrosserhe's working on ssl for the uwsgi services and other backends18:02
noonedeadpunkyeah, saw that18:02
noonedeadpunkI mean - uwsgi covers like 90%?18:02
jrosserand I think we have something pretty close to a spec for that which I'll get him to push up18:03
noonedeadpunkthe rest are horizon/keystone which is jsut apache and neutron, damn it...18:03
jrosserit's kind of tricky to make that possible without a giant downtime, but he's got a plan18:03
noonedeadpunkoh?18:03
noonedeadpunkthat's interesting18:03
jrosseryeah, it's all to do with haproxy18:03
jrosserbecause it thinks the backend is either ssl, or not18:03
jrosserand if we just switch all of that in one go the whole cloud is broken until you redeploy all the services18:04
noonedeadpunkwell, yes, that's true18:04
noonedeadpunkunless we can manage through socket backends18:04
noonedeadpunkbut we would need module for that18:04
noonedeadpunk*manage backend through haproxy socket18:05
mgariepycan we do both at the same time ? like having both ssl and non-ssl endpoint in the config until it's removed ?18:06
mgariepythe ssl one will start down until it's re-deployed and then switch to on once it's done.18:07
jrosserI think the short story is that you can use a tcp frontend then redirect based on inspecting the requests, so you can handle incoming connections of either ssl or not18:07
noonedeadpunkI think we can have 1 backend 1ssl and 1 not. but not with current state of the role and our logic18:07
jrosserand then you can duplicate the backends ssl and not for the other way18:07
jrosseranyway I will see if we can write a spec, it's all here in a document anyway just needs pasting into a review18:09
jrosserbut you have to handle not only switching backends from http to https, but also the client config being changed over as well as the services are re-deployed18:10
noonedeadpunkthat is really interesting thing indeed18:11
jrosseryeah, it's much more complicated than it appears at first, because the services all talk to each other18:11
noonedeadpunktbh I'd say to switch backends during runtime and reload config file afterwards (like when all is done or smth)18:13
noonedeadpunkas most likely you will migrate once. And then this might be needed for cert rotations18:13
noonedeadpunkbut we anyway can disable backends for this purpose atm18:14
jrosserpseudocode for designate https://paste.opendev.org/show/811523/18:14
noonedeadpunkis haproxy happy?18:15
noonedeadpunkI mean - it has 2 identical backends18:15
noonedeadpunk(except ssl)18:15
noonedeadpunkI never dared to check this tbh )18:16
jrosserI believe so, James is back tomorrow and we can get an update, but afaik this is what he is testing in the lab now18:16
opendevreviewDmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_horizon master: Improve defining horizon_lib_dir  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_horizon/+/82092818:17
opendevreviewDmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_horizon master: Improve defining horizon_lib_dir  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_horizon/+/82092818:19
*** ysandeep is now known as ysandeep|out18:23
opendevreviewDmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_horizon master: Improve defining horizon_lib_dir  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_horizon/+/82092818:27
opendevreviewDmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_horizon master: Improve defining horizon_lib_dir  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_horizon/+/82092818:49
opendevreviewDmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_horizon master: Improve defining horizon_lib_dir  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_horizon/+/82092819:05
opendevreviewDmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-openstack_hosts master: Fix UCA enablement for Focal  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-openstack_hosts/+/82094219:41
opendevreviewDmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Set galera to use TLS for connections by default  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/80788019:45
opendevreviewDmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-openstack_hosts master: Update release name for Xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-openstack_hosts/+/82094419:49
opendevreviewDmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-openstack_hosts master: Fix UCA enablement for Focal  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-openstack_hosts/+/82094219:51
noonedeadpunkdamn it19:51
noonedeadpunkI was 100% sure that release codename has been updated like after previous one...19:52
noonedeadpunkSo we need to backport a bit more stuff than was expected :(19:54
noonedeadpunkand this should be backported back to V I believe19:55
noonedeadpunkhttps://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-openstack_hosts/+/82094219:55
jrosserisn't the UCA distro support a bit sparse?20:06
jrosserwell, maybe it *was* at the time we started doing focal20:06
jrosserneed to be careful with this as UCA can also contain ceph20:06
mgariepyanything needed of U - em ?20:36
jrosserhmm then we have a circular dependancy on openstack-ansible-tests patches trying to recover global pins from the xena branch of openstack-ansible, which doesnt yet exist22:43
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_mistral stable/xena: Updated from OpenStack Ansible Tests  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_mistral/+/82085322:48
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_tempest stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_tempest/+/82082122:49
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_tempest stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_tempest/+/82082222:49
« Monday, 2021-12-06 Index Wednesday, 2021-12-08 »

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.2 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!