Tuesday, 2022-02-15

opendevreviewchandan kumar proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_tempest master: Move zuul jobs layout to centos9 only for master branch  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_tempest/+/82844907:23
opendevreviewchandan kumar proposed openstack/ansible-role-python_venv_build master: Move TripleO zuul jobs layout to centos9 only for master branch  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-role-python_venv_build/+/82916407:33
opendevreviewJonathan Rosser proposed openstack/openstack-ansible stable/xena: Bump SHA for openstack_hosts to pick up centos repos fix  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/82916708:21
opendevreviewJonathan Rosser proposed openstack/openstack-ansible stable/xena: Bump SHA for openstack_hosts to pick up centos repos fix  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/82916808:22
opendevreviewJonathan Rosser proposed openstack/openstack-ansible stable/victoria: Bump SHA for openstack_hosts to pick up centos repos fix  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/82916908:24
opendevreviewJonathan Rosser proposed openstack/openstack-ansible stable/xena: Bump SHA for openstack_hosts to pick up centos repos fix  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/82919008:25
opendevreviewJonathan Rosser proposed openstack/openstack-ansible stable/wallaby: Bump SHA for openstack_hosts to pick up centos repos fix  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/82919108:27
jrossermorning08:45
damiandabrowski[m]hey!08:46
opendevreviewchandan kumar proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_tempest master: Move zuul jobs layout to centos9 only for master branch  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_tempest/+/82844908:59
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_horizon master: Disable barbican-ui dashboard  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_horizon/+/82815409:12
opendevreviewJonathan Rosser proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_horizon stable/xena: Disable barbican-ui dashboard  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_horizon/+/82917509:50
opendevreviewJonathan Rosser proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_horizon stable/wallaby: Disable barbican-ui dashboard  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_horizon/+/82917609:50
opendevreviewJonathan Rosser proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_horizon stable/victoria: Disable barbican-ui dashboard  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_horizon/+/82917709:51
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_keystone master: Switch keystone logging to syslog  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_keystone/+/82846910:25
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_nova master: Remove secure_proxy_ssl_header logic  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_nova/+/82846710:28
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-repo_server stable/wallaby: Ensure insist=true is always set for lsyncd  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-repo_server/+/82883610:36
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_nova master: Fix race-condition when libvirt starts unwillingly  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_nova/+/82870410:37
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_nova master: Drop libvirtd_version identification  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_nova/+/82870210:38
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-repo_server stable/victoria: Ensure insist=true is always set for lsyncd  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-repo_server/+/82883710:39
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_keystone master: Use uwsgi role for keystone  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_keystone/+/82851010:43
chandankumarjrosser: noonedeadpunk please have a look at these reviews https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-role-python_venv_build/+/829164 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_tempest/+/828449 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-config_template/+/828295 when free thanks!10:44
noonedeadpunkchandankumar: why I don't see actually a defined job to be tested in https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-role-python_venv_build/+/829164 ?11:00
noonedeadpunkand morning everyone11:00
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_neutron stable/wallaby: Make calico non voting  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_neutron/+/82865711:03
damiandabrowski[m]hey Dmitriy!11:08
chandankumarnoonedeadpunk: weired11:13
chandankumarlooking into that why it is not getting triggered11:13
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_horizon master: Move Listen definition to VHosts  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_horizon/+/82851511:16
*** dviroel|out is now known as dviroel11:19
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible master: Fix behaviour of OSA_CONFIG_DIR  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/82891511:20
opendevreviewchandan kumar proposed openstack/ansible-role-python_venv_build master: [DNM] tripleo content provider  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-role-python_venv_build/+/82922111:33
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible master: Move infra-journal-remote logic to its role  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/82473411:36
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible master: Do not run rsyslog against RabbitMQ  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/82634711:36
opendevreviewchandan kumar proposed openstack/ansible-role-python_venv_build master: [DNM] tripleo content provider  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-role-python_venv_build/+/82922112:01
opendevreviewchandan kumar proposed openstack/ansible-role-python_venv_build master: Move TripleO zuul jobs layout to centos9 only for master branch  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-role-python_venv_build/+/82916412:04
opendevreviewchandan kumar proposed openstack/ansible-role-python_venv_build master: Move TripleO zuul jobs layout to centos9 only for master branch  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-role-python_venv_build/+/82916412:16
opendevreviewchandan kumar proposed openstack/ansible-role-python_venv_build master: Move TripleO zuul jobs layout to centos9 only for master branch  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-role-python_venv_build/+/82916412:27
admin1upgraded to 24.0.1  .. no errors .. then re-running the playbooks, i get     in neutron:   os_neutron : Perform a DB expand   alembic.script.revision.ResolutionError: No such revision or branch 'cd9ef14ccf87'  .. and in nova:   os_nova : Synchronize the nova API DB schema   alembic.util.exc.CommandError: Can't locate revision identified by12:40
admin1'b30f573d3377'"  ..  12:40
jrosseradmin1: what release are you deploying?12:42
admin124.0.1 12:43
jrosserwell, it feels like you have a mistake somewhere with your repos12:44
jrosserbecause the only reference to the neutron db revision is in Yoga https://codesearch.opendev.org/?q=cd9ef14ccf8712:44
admin1git brach shows  24.0.1 . but the actual evenvs show 24.1.0.dev108 12:44
admin1i am going to rm-rf /etc/ansible/roles .. git clone and checkout 24.0.1 and retry 12:45
jrosserand similarly https://opendev.org/openstack/neutron/src/branch/master/neutron/db/migration/alembic_migrations/versions/yoga/expand/34cf8b009713_add_router_ndp_proxy_table.py#L2512:46
jrosserthat file does not exist for Xena branch of nova12:46
jrosserwell deleting the ansible roles is pretty unhelpful tbh12:46
jrosseras the errors are coming from the actual nova/neutron code itself, nothing to do with ansible12:46
admin1do i recreate all the lxc containers ? 12:47
jrosseri have no idea what you have done :)12:47
admin1true 12:47
jrossermy hunch is that at some point you've been using master branch12:47
admin1only guess is it had too many screens .. maybe accidently master 12:47
jrosserfor example the version of nova that you are going to get is defined here https://github.com/openstack/openstack-ansible/blob/stable/xena/playbooks/defaults/repo_packages/openstack_services.yml#L199-L20212:49
jrosserthe point that you have checked out for openstack-ansible defines the git sha of the services12:49
opendevreviewchandan kumar proposed openstack/ansible-role-python_venv_build master: Move TripleO zuul jobs layout to centos9 only for master branch  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-role-python_venv_build/+/82916413:27
opendevreviewchandan kumar proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_tempest master: Move zuul jobs layout to centos9 only for master branch  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_tempest/+/82844913:28
opendevreviewDmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_nova stable/xena: Fix race-condition when libvirt starts unwillingly  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_nova/+/82925313:36
opendevreviewDmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_nova stable/xena: Fix race-condition when libvirt starts unwillingly  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_nova/+/82925313:36
opendevreviewDmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_horizon stable/xena: Move Listen definition to VHosts  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_horizon/+/82925413:37
opendevreviewDmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_horizon stable/wallaby: Move Listen definition to VHosts  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_horizon/+/82925513:37
opendevreviewDmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible stable/xena: Fix behaviour of OSA_CONFIG_DIR  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/82925613:38
opendevreviewDmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible stable/wallaby: Fix behaviour of OSA_CONFIG_DIR  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/82925713:38
opendevreviewchandan kumar proposed openstack/ansible-config_template master: Move zuul jobs layout to centos9 only for master branch  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-config_template/+/82829513:38
chandankumarnoonedeadpunk: the job will appear now, we updated the patch, thanks for highlighting the issue :-)13:43
noonedeadpunkawesome thanks!13:43
noonedeadpunksame was also for venv_build job iirc13:44
noonedeadpunkah, you updated it as wel, nice13:44
opendevreviewDamian Dąbrowski proposed openstack/ansible-role-python_venv_build master: Slurp constraints.txt separately for each host in a batch  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-role-python_venv_build/+/82927014:10
damiandabrowski[m]^ nasty bug when it comes to distro upgrades, spent few hours on troubleshooting yesterday14:11
spateldamiandabrowski[m] share your experience :) 14:23
damiandabrowski[m]during bionic -> focal upgrade, keystone failed to build venv on newly redeployed controller(ofc i was running it without limits to make it work)14:25
damiandabrowski[m]then i realized that it works fine when i limit keystone playbook only for this single focal host14:25
damiandabrowski[m]and then i started to read python_venv_build role and i found out the culprit :D rest of the story is described in commit msg14:27
damiandabrowski[m]i'm using 22.3.2 so i don't have pinned uwsgi version like here: https://opendev.org/openstack/openstack-ansible/commit/5132952618dd8659defdaff3c558fca159ba48b414:27
spateli would love to know the upgrade process you used just to understand what is the best approach :)14:27
damiandabrowski[m]and in my case, uwsgi was the problem as bionic had different version in its constraints14:28
damiandabrowski[m]hmm, i'm just sticking to https://docs.openstack.org/openstack-ansible/latest/admin/upgrades/distribution-upgrades.html :D 14:28
noonedeadpunkI think we can be smart and efficient here, but can't think properly today. Will review tomorrow :)14:35
noonedeadpunkand we have extra side-effects regarding cross-OS and constraints tbh14:36
damiandabrowski[m]sure, thanks!14:47
jrosserdamiandabrowski[m]: that suggests the upgrade order was wrong?14:53
jrosserthe new controller should not be using the repo server on the old ones, ever14:53
jrosseror backends were not in maint on the LB14:53
damiandabrowski[m]it wasn't ;) that's not the case14:53
damiandabrowski[m]it's only about how newly deployed node gets constraints.txt14:54
damiandabrowski[m]only the "local" repo server was enabled14:55
jrosserhmm14:55
damiandabrowski[m]so, keystone playbook needs to be executed without limits, and it runs in serial [1, 100%]14:58
damiandabrowski[m]second batch is problematic as it may contain hosts with different operating systems which may need different constraints.txt14:59
damiandabrowski[m]but this task doesn't care about it: https://opendev.org/openstack/ansible-role-python_venv_build/src/branch/master/tasks/python_venv_install.yml#L16 14:59
jrosseri'm a bit confused - upper-constraints is the same regardless of OS version?14:59
noonedeadpunkbut not regardless of osa version15:00
noonedeadpunkbut well15:00
jrosser? "second batch is problematic as it may contain hosts with different operating systems which may need different constraints.txt" 15:00
noonedeadpunkosa version should be same during upgrrade anyway15:01
jrosserand also latest tag i think15:01
noonedeadpunk#startmeeting openstack_ansible_meeting15:01
opendevmeetMeeting started Tue Feb 15 15:01:26 2022 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is noonedeadpunk. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.15:01
opendevmeetUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.15:01
opendevmeetThe meeting name has been set to 'openstack_ansible_meeting'15:01
jrosserwhich could be a factor here15:01
damiandabrowski[m]osa version was the same on all nodes - 22.3.215:01
noonedeadpunk#topic bug triage15:01
damiandabrowski[m]uwsgi version was the problem here as its version is not pinned in 22.3.2 ;) so bionic and focal had different uwsgi versions in constraints.txt15:02
damiandabrowski[m]but maybe let's leave it after the meeting15:02
noonedeadpunkor we can discuss on the meeting)15:02
noonedeadpunkas it's supposed to be bug?15:02
damiandabrowski[m]+115:02
damiandabrowski[m]haha, that's right15:02
damiandabrowski[m]i just didn't want to make a mess during Your meeting :D 15:03
jrosseri guess i was just pointing out that the uwswgi pin had been backported down all the stable branches15:07
noonedeadpunkoh yes, it was15:09
noonedeadpunkTo have that said, I wasn't digging into that yet15:09
noonedeadpunkSo no idea about the bug yet:)15:10
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-lxc_container_create master: Allow redhat.yml to support any distribution and major release  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-lxc_container_create/+/82906215:10
noonedeadpunkok, then I think would be great to discuss bugs from LP15:10
noonedeadpunk#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/196058715:10
noonedeadpunkSo jrosser, you think we should comment out and make it requirement, 127.0.1.1 record from hosts?15:11
noonedeadpunkAs then for ubuntu hostname might become a bit messy15:12
noonedeadpunkor well, it can change during deployment this way)15:12
noonedeadpunkat least fqdn15:12
jrosseri think i'm slightly not following the whole thread in the bug there15:12
noonedeadpunkso rabbitmqctl uses 25672 port for managing rabbit.15:13
noonedeadpunkby default it connects as user@hostname15:13
noonedeadpunkand with https://opendev.org/openstack/openstack-ansible-rabbitmq_server/src/branch/stable/xena/templates/rabbitmq.config.j2#L63 we are ensuring that it listens only on management ip15:14
noonedeadpunkso when there's record for `127.0.1.1 hostname`, hostname resolvs to 127.0.1.1 and not to management ip15:14
jrosserat the simplest level i can see that on a metal host the 127.0.1.1 entry is there, and on a container it is not15:14
jrosserfor focal15:14
noonedeadpunkwhen we drop 127.0.1.1 and we have record of `<management_ip> hostname` hostname starts resolving to the IP where 25672 listens15:16
noonedeadpunkor we can drop that record, then we get 0.0.0.0:25672 and rabbitmqctl has no issues connecting as well15:16
noonedeadpunkyeah, I believe that it's only metal issue15:17
jrosseri guess i had been on a bit of a quest to remove all binding to 0.0.0.0 everywhere15:17
noonedeadpunkwe don't add such record to containers15:17
jrosseri would be wondering what that meant for the external VIP on that port for a standard layout deployment15:17
jrosserwhere infra is also LB15:17
noonedeadpunkBut that's rabbit? It's not balanced)15:18
noonedeadpunkexcept monitoring port15:18
jrosserno, but it's listening on 0.0.0.015:18
jrosserVIP is belonging to the host, not haproxy exlusively?15:18
noonedeadpunkah15:19
noonedeadpunkoh, indeed, so we expose port to the world15:19
jrosseryes, thats my concern15:19
noonedeadpunkfair. I missed that bit indeed15:20
jrosserthere was two things for bind-to-mgmt really, all the metal port conflicts, but also exposing * on all interfaces before15:20
jrosserlarger deploys might have seperate haproxy node, so this would not matter so much15:20
noonedeadpunkok, fair15:21
noonedeadpunkthen another issue, is that this seems to gone for master after my config refactoring15:22
noonedeadpunkwill check that15:22
noonedeadpunkand yeah, then the close to only way to prohibit 127.0.1.1 in hosts if rabbit is there15:23
noonedeadpunkI think that's it for bugs for now15:24
noonedeadpunk#topic office hours15:24
jrosserwe have exciting news for rocky linux15:24
noonedeadpunkoh?15:24
noonedeadpunkhave we merged it ?:)15:24
jrosserlxc and metal is working15:24
jrosserah not quite :)15:24
mgariepyhooo nice work15:25
noonedeadpunkindeed!15:25
jrosseri did some refactoring in lxc_hosts to make redhat-like things easier15:25
jrosserand also lxc_container_create15:25
noonedeadpunkI bet I vote some patches...15:26
noonedeadpunkAnd zuul jobs are still not the case?15:26
jrossernot yet15:26
jrosserwe still have some hidden issues for centos15:26
jrosserrepo config is messy, so i made this https://review.opendev.org/c/zuul/zuul-jobs/+/82902815:27
jrosserand once that merges we can do this https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/82911115:27
noonedeadpunkoh!15:28
jrosseri expect that is going to break our centos jobs a bit, but thats good as it's then the same behavious as outside zuul15:28
noonedeadpunkso we can pass vars)15:28
jrosseryes i think so15:28
jrosseri think there is a similar refactoring we can do in the lxc roles for the debian/ubuntu vars15:32
noonedeadpunkyeah, likely we can indeed15:33
jrossertheres very little difference between them, and perhaps even some merging of debian/ubuntu/redhat as well15:33
jrosseronce the centos repos are done properly we really need a point release15:34
opendevreviewDmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible stable/xena: Allow fast SSH cipher for upgrade jobs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/82925815:35
noonedeadpunkI think we need to release 24.1.0 now?15:36
noonedeadpunkDo we have anything we want to merge before that?15:36
jrosseri think that the centos upgrade jobs will go green again with these 829167 829167 82916715:37
jrosserwould be nice to see the upgrades working15:37
jrosserwe should fix the repos for centos15:37
*** dviroel is now known as dviroel|lunch15:37
noonedeadpunkyep fair. Also recently backported some recently merged fixes.15:38
jrosserand i think that this is a hidden bug from the enabling of PowerTools in CI https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-openstack_hosts/+/82902115:38
noonedeadpunkuh. we should use test there instead of comparison imo15:39
noonedeadpunknot critical to use it but then it won't occur15:40
jrosserhere? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-openstack_hosts/+/829021/2/defaults/main.yml#16315:40
noonedeadpunknah, here https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-openstack_hosts/+/829019/1/tasks/openstack_hosts_configure_dnf.yml15:41
noonedeadpunk`is version('8', '==')15:41
noonedeadpunkbut yeah, might be no sense in that... comparison more lightweight likely...15:42
jrosseroverall i think we are quite close to being able to make 24.1.015:42
noonedeadpunkbut tbh I'd expected `ansible_facts['distribution_major_version']` to be int...15:42
jrosserjust a few details15:42
noonedeadpunkyeah, agree. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_nova/+/829253 backport would be nice as well I believe15:42
jrosser`"ansible_distribution_major_version": "8"`15:43
noonedeadpunkI see...15:43
jrosserwe still do have a lot of os_tempest patches from damiandabrowski[m] 15:46
jrosserare they still blocked on there being a comment to resolve on the bottom one in the stack?15:47
jrosseri was wondering if it was necessary to stack them like that or if they can merge seperately to make reviewing easier15:47
noonedeadpunkmost of them can be independant yes15:47
noonedeadpunkand yeah, if it wasn't updated then whole batch is blocked :(15:48
jrosseris there anything else we are trying to land this cycle?15:48
damiandabrowski[m]i'll try to find out which ones can be independent and fix it soon :/15:48
jrosserssh keys stuff is on the way15:49
jrosserproxysql?15:49
noonedeadpunkI didn't have time to finish it yet :( But yes, will try to get some time quite soon15:49
noonedeadpunkWhat about internal ssl?15:50
noonedeadpunkAre we ready to merge https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-specs/+/822850 ?15:50
jrosserah right yes15:51
jrosserone of the things james gibson is looking at is a proposal for an intermediate haproxy config15:52
jrosseronce which supports http and https backends at the same time for use during a migration15:52
jrosserperhaps seeing that helps know if the spec is right15:53
noonedeadpunkoh, ok15:53
damiandabrowski[m]btw. i've implemented a simple fix for mariabackup: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-galera_server/+/82897715:53
noonedeadpunkI hope we will also be able to replace some cert management with pki role - like keystone and octavia15:53
noonedeadpunklgtm 15:54
jrosseroh wow i didnt even look in keystone :)15:54
noonedeadpunkand fwiw we're really interested in make internal ssl going as eager to use it :)15:55
jrosserswitching internal VIP to SSL is relatively OK step15:55
jrosserswitching over the backends is much more involved15:55
noonedeadpunkinternal VIP is running via SSL for quite some time but nasty hacks being used for backends<->haproxy encryption15:56
noonedeadpunkso yeah - if some help needed - let us know)15:57
jrosserwe only have james for another couple of weeks15:58
jrosserso we will have the spec and a haproxy setup proposal15:58
jrosserthough turning that into a viable in-place upgrade is the real heavy lifiting i think15:58
jrosserand we will need some really clear docs for this15:59
noonedeadpunkyeah, agree15:59
jrosserplus maybe a PTG topic is if we keep supporting a choice of SSL / non-SSL15:59
noonedeadpunkdamn16:00
noonedeadpunkwhat is Z release name :D ?16:00
noonedeadpunklet's start populating this https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/osa-Z-ptg16:01
damiandabrowski[m]"OpenStack next release name is final- OpenStack Zed"16:01
damiandabrowski[m]found it on ml16:01
noonedeadpunkLol, it's today one :)16:02
noonedeadpunkSince there's no public voting, stopped keeping track on the progress16:03
noonedeadpunk#endmeeting16:04
opendevmeetMeeting ended Tue Feb 15 16:04:23 2022 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)16:04
opendevmeetMinutes:        https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/openstack_ansible_meeting/2022/openstack_ansible_meeting.2022-02-15-15.01.html16:04
opendevmeetMinutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/openstack_ansible_meeting/2022/openstack_ansible_meeting.2022-02-15-15.01.txt16:04
opendevmeetLog:            https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/openstack_ansible_meeting/2022/openstack_ansible_meeting.2022-02-15-15.01.log.html16:04
noonedeadpunkwe need to merge RBAC changes btw for Z for sure.16:13
jrosseroh yes16:16
jrosserdo we need to get ahead of that in Y and add the service role to existing things?16:16
noonedeadpunkyep16:18
noonedeadpunkand then drop admin in Z I guess16:18
noonedeadpunkSorry, for Y indeed :)16:19
* noonedeadpunk slept for 4 hours today so has total mess in head16:20
opendevreviewJonathan Rosser proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Create yaml file of the zuul job vars for embedded ansible and logging  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/82121016:28
opendevreviewJonathan Rosser proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Create yaml file of the zuul job vars for embedded ansible and logging  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/82121016:28
opendevreviewJonathan Rosser proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Create yaml file of the zuul job vars for embedded ansible  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/82121016:29
*** dviroel|lunch is now known as dviroel16:52
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_nova stable/xena: Fix race-condition when libvirt starts unwillingly  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_nova/+/82925317:33
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_horizon stable/victoria: Disable barbican-ui dashboard  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_horizon/+/82917717:36
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_nova master: Drop nova_glance_api_servers variable  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_nova/+/82846018:37
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible stable/xena: Bump SHA for openstack_hosts to pick up centos repos fix  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/82916718:41
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-galera_server master: Use unix socket while granting access for the backup service  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-galera_server/+/82897718:44
spatelhow to force reboot vm using virsh command?18:47
admin1virsh destroy to just kill it 18:47
spatelmy vm got stuck and now i can't reboot and shutdown using virsh shutdown <uuid>18:47
spatelbut we have data on that VM :(18:47
spatelso there is no safe or better way to force it.. that is very odd18:48
opendevreviewDamian Dąbrowski proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-galera_server stable/xena: Use unix socket while granting access for the backup service  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-galera_server/+/82925918:48
opendevreviewDamian Dąbrowski proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-galera_server stable/wallaby: Use unix socket while granting access for the backup service  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-galera_server/+/82926018:48
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible stable/wallaby: Bump SHA for openstack_hosts to pick up centos repos fix  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/82919118:50
spateladmin1 i got it... 18:54
spateldestroy not going to terminate VM but just remove vm in virsh18:55
admin1its like pulling its power away 18:55
admin1virsh undefine will remove it 18:55
admin1virsh destroy will kill it 18:55
spateli used virsh destroy and then nova start and all good vm is back 18:56
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_keystone master: Define X-Forwarded-Proto for keystone  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_keystone/+/82851818:58
*** dviroel is now known as dviroel|out21:35

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!