| opendevreview | Merged openstack/openstack-ansible master: Treat dashes/underscores as interchangeable symbols for container names https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/905432 | 00:04 |
|---|---|---|
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/openstack-ansible stable/2023.1: Remove yoga->antelope slurp upgrade jobs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/910220 | 00:26 |
| opendevreview | Aleksandr Chudinov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_glance master: Add property protection configuration https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_glance/+/909820 | 07:09 |
| jrosser | noonedeadpunk: thanks for the advice with the public network / magnum, it's passing now https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_magnum/+/905199 | 08:30 |
| noonedeadpunk | jrosser: the only comment I have on that was https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_magnum/+/905199/28/zuul.d/jobs.yaml | 08:33 |
| noonedeadpunk | or well, there's also a debug output I'm not sure about... | 08:34 |
| jrosser | ah you are right, will tidy up | 08:34 |
| noonedeadpunk | and https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-ops/+/906363 not looking bad at all, imo... | 08:35 |
| opendevreview | Jonathan Rosser proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_magnum master: Add job to test Vexxhost cluster API driver https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_magnum/+/905199 | 08:36 |
| noonedeadpunk | jrosser: and uncomment pls generic jobs :) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_magnum/+/905199/29/zuul.d/project.yaml | 08:37 |
| noonedeadpunk | I think it's ready to be landed now? | 08:37 |
| jrosser | oh doh :) | 08:37 |
| jrosser | of course! | 08:37 |
| opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_magnum master: Move insecure param to keystone_auth section https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_magnum/+/905110 | 08:37 |
| opendevreview | Jonathan Rosser proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_magnum master: Add job to test Vexxhost cluster API driver https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_magnum/+/905199 | 08:38 |
| opendevreview | Jonathan Rosser proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_magnum master: Add job to test Vexxhost cluster API driver https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_magnum/+/905199 | 08:39 |
| noonedeadpunk | jrosser: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_magnum/+/905199/30/zuul.d/nodesets.yml -> nodesets.yaml | 08:39 |
| opendevreview | Jonathan Rosser proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_magnum master: Add job to test Vexxhost cluster API driver https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_magnum/+/905199 | 08:40 |
| noonedeadpunk | ah | 08:40 |
| noonedeadpunk | ok, yes, GB vs G | 08:40 |
| noonedeadpunk | seems it finally got scheduled.... | 08:43 |
| jrosser | let me guess we now find some other mess in the regular magnum jobs | 08:45 |
| noonedeadpunk | haha | 08:46 |
| noonedeadpunk | Well, I just realized that I completely forgot about openstack_resources conversion patches for magnum and octavia... | 08:47 |
| noonedeadpunk | and they're not merged and not passing CI | 08:47 |
| noonedeadpunk | or well. they were at some point, but not latest run... | 08:47 |
| noonedeadpunk | and also slightly o_O on https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/a83d9ea4154745d7983a0eb5ceed6cd6 | 08:48 |
| opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Do not use underscores in container names https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/905433 | 08:50 |
| opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Allow env.d to contain underscores in physical_skel https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/905438 | 08:50 |
| opendevreview | Jonathan Rosser proposed openstack/ansible-role-python_venv_build master: Workaround ansible unsafe text templating bug https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-role-python_venv_build/+/910477 | 08:53 |
| opendevreview | Jonathan Rosser proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Bump ansible version to 2.15.9 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/905619 | 08:53 |
| jrosser | ^ this is guesswork just now but the code path is very different if you tell the package: module which package manager to use instead of 'auto' | 08:54 |
| noonedeadpunk | I wonder if we should try jumping to 2.16.4 if it works... | 08:56 |
| noonedeadpunk | from one side it's late, but probably not too late... | 08:56 |
| noonedeadpunk | or there were some concerns on Python versions.... | 08:57 |
| noonedeadpunk | ah. btw, yesterday we've found that passlib in python is in quite bad shape and not working on latest python versions | 08:58 |
| noonedeadpunk | on which ansible relies heavily. not only ansible though | 08:58 |
| opendevreview | Aleksandr Chudinov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_glance master: Add property protection configuration https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_glance/+/909820 | 09:31 |
| jrosser | noonedeadpunk: yeah for 2.16.4 i think there might be some deprecations to deal with so i held off on that | 09:37 |
| jrosser | of course can stack another patch on top to do that | 09:37 |
| noonedeadpunk | I guess you're right and makes sense at least to get 2.15.9 working properly first... | 09:38 |
| jrosser | it think that adding `use: "{{ ansible_facts['pkg_mgr'] }}"` to the package: module will let us move the ansible version forward | 10:25 |
| jrosser | looks like it is working | 10:25 |
| noonedeadpunk | great news | 10:53 |
| noonedeadpunk | yeah, I see things passing | 10:54 |
| jrosser | oh yes so the regular magnum jobs are not looking good | 13:30 |
| noonedeadpunk | ok, so feels like we'd need openstack_resources merged first | 13:41 |
| jrosser | noonedeadpunk: something not quote right here https://opendev.org/openstack/openstack-ansible/commit/1d59c06a5daee14cfddfca3e85fc5a7ec8642d77 | 13:41 |
| jrosser | oh wait yes | 13:41 |
| noonedeadpunk | but upgrade jobs are still failing :( | 13:41 |
| noonedeadpunk | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_magnum/+/901185?tab=change-view-tab-header-zuul-results-summary | 13:41 |
| noonedeadpunk | or wait, status is just not reported back yet :( | 13:42 |
| noonedeadpunk | yeah, but it's the same in zuul | 13:42 |
| noonedeadpunk | upgrade jobs are passing until they are TLS ones | 13:42 |
| noonedeadpunk | somehow TLS only is getting broken... | 13:42 |
| jrosser | failing still https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/status#901185 | 13:43 |
| noonedeadpunk | but only TLS... how does that make any sense.... | 13:45 |
| jrosser | Details: [{'request_id': '', 'code': 'client', 'status': 400, 'title': 'Cluster type (vm, Unset, kubernetes) not supported', 'detail': 'Cluster type (vm, Unset, kubernetes) not supported.', 'links': []}] | 13:45 |
| noonedeadpunk | yeah, like no image | 13:46 |
| jrosser | maybe it can’t talk to glance with tls | 14:05 |
| noonedeadpunk | that would be weird error then.... | 14:06 |
| jrosser | sadly we never made magnum/heat driver work so I don’t have a reference to compare with | 14:06 |
| noonedeadpunk | We do have it working as of today | 14:06 |
| noonedeadpunk | and over tls... | 14:06 |
| jrosser | hmm | 14:06 |
| noonedeadpunk | and don't have anything sdpecial | 14:06 |
| noonedeadpunk | (anything special in terms of overrrides) | 14:08 |
| noonedeadpunk | except defining default volume type explicitly (otherwise it does random choice) | 14:09 |
| noonedeadpunk | sand we don;t stor /etc on upgrade jobs quite unfortunatelly :( | 14:10 |
| noonedeadpunk | I can try to reproduce it one more time of now, when there're less dependencies | 14:10 |
| opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Update upstream SHAs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/910386 | 14:11 |
| opendevreview | Jonathan Rosser proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Bump ansible version to 2.16.4 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/910515 | 14:33 |
| spatel | Anybody here using cinder NFS backend? any advice or config I should be aware? | 15:11 |
| spatel | I have deployed and everything looks good but somehow service is showing down. | 15:12 |
| spatel | I can see NFS mounted on cinder-volume and permissions are all good | 15:12 |
| noonedeadpunk | finally fully migrated out from NFS | 15:35 |
| noonedeadpunk | advice - don't use NFS | 15:35 |
| jrosser | noonedeadpunk: ewwwwwww https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/910515?tab=change-view-tab-header-zuul-results-summary | 17:31 |
| jrosser | python / ansible really does move faster than the LTS OS releases now | 17:31 |
| noonedeadpunk | well | 17:34 |
| noonedeadpunk | we should drop bullseye on 2024.1 I assume | 17:34 |
| noonedeadpunk | but then we'll need to wait for el10.... | 17:34 |
| jrosser | there is certainly some things we can fix there in the meantime | 17:35 |
| noonedeadpunk | jammy/bookworm kinda pass in the meanwhile | 17:37 |
| jrosser | pretty much yes | 17:39 |
| jrosser | there is an `include` deprecation which breaks the ceph job from inside ceph-ansible | 17:40 |
| jrosser | should we abandon open changes on V / W / X branches? | 17:48 |
| noonedeadpunk | ceph-ansible is topic on it's own | 17:50 |
| noonedeadpunk | Well, I'd love to try fixing CI for some of these branches, but realistically - no time for that right now | 17:51 |
| jrosser | are they also all about to become unmaintained/<x> | 17:52 |
| jrosser | or is that only for yoga | 17:52 |
| noonedeadpunk | it's only from yoga and later | 17:53 |
| noonedeadpunk | btw | 17:53 |
| noonedeadpunk | we have broken renos due to yoga as well | 17:53 |
| noonedeadpunk | which I can't reproduce locally somehow | 17:53 |
| jrosser | lots of fallout/breakage from this change it seems | 17:55 |
| opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Add ovn-bgp-agent to source install requirements https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/909694 | 17:55 |
| * noonedeadpunk not fan of it | 17:55 | |
| jrosser | and it breaks things with many years of finessing built into them so are not always just easy to fix | 17:55 |
| opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_neutron master: Add support for ovn-bgp-agent deployment https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_neutron/+/909780 | 17:56 |
| noonedeadpunk | hm, but I somehow still do have origin/stable/yoga locally... | 18:04 |
| opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: reno: Update master for unmaintained/yoga https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/908499 | 18:27 |
| frickler | vwx ist also planned to go unmaintained https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/910414 | 19:06 |
| noonedeadpunk | frickler: um, am I reading TC resolution linked there in a wrong way? | 19:31 |
| noonedeadpunk | the first sentence is a bit confusing then I guesss | 19:37 |
| noonedeadpunk | "The current Extended Maintenance branches are not SLURP releases and wouldn’t be eligible for Unmaintained branches with the guidelines above" | 19:37 |
| noonedeadpunk | As indeed, if start reading bullet point below, this one ^ is not addressing any branches? | 19:37 |
| noonedeadpunk | As "Until the first SLURP release ends its maintained phase, all current branches are eligible for Unmaintained" -> Zed/Yoga | 19:38 |
| noonedeadpunk | But "The last 3 active Extended Maintenance branches are automatically transitioned to Unmaintained branches." -> V/W/X ? | 19:38 |
| gmann | noonedeadpunk: because SLURP thing started after 2023.1 only, moving three latest EM branches v/w/x to unmaintained are best effort for smooth migration to 'unmaintained' model | 19:47 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/openstack-ansible-plugins stable/2023.1: Add override for gluster host used for bootstrap operations https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-plugins/+/909868 | 19:48 |
| gmann | when we will be in 2023.1 moving from maintained phase it will be clear with 'only SLURP release goes to unmaintained and non-slurp to EOL directly' | 19:50 |
| noonedeadpunk | gmann: yeah. I just somehow thought that existing EM are left intact | 19:57 |
| noonedeadpunk | and only ones created after resolution are affected | 19:57 |
| gmann | I remember we discussed that and did not do it to avoid confusion and extra work to maintain both 'EM' and 'unmaintianed' model | 19:58 |
| noonedeadpunk | As it seems that first part of transition is still addressign this discussion, whilke second bullet point overrules it | 19:59 |
| noonedeadpunk | but ok | 20:00 |
| noonedeadpunk | the most confusing part is still the unmaintained group - have no time to reply Brian on the ML though :( | 20:00 |
| gmann | yeah, 2nd bullet just cover the temporary EM branches for this transition | 20:00 |
| noonedeadpunk | gmann: I think a new reno release might be needed though, before proceeding with EOM tags | 20:05 |
| noonedeadpunk | wrt https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/reno/+/910547 | 20:05 |
| noonedeadpunk | or well, at least with branches removal | 20:05 |
| gmann | noonedeadpunk: so is that not covered by update of release note source from stable/unmaintained - https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22reno-eom-yoga%22 | 20:10 |
| gmann | because unmaintained branches will be tagged as EOL when removal. that is my understanding but we can check with frickler /release team | 20:11 |
| jrosser | the saddest part is that we have even more work than before to do anything on the new branch names | 20:11 |
| jrosser | as there is a ton of assumed stable/x in all sorts of places | 20:12 |
| gmann | yeah, changing the namespace added a lot of work but that is at least will be one time thing and less overahead of maintaining them as EM for 18 months or so | 20:13 |
| gmann | hopefully we will automate bot for such changes in future. it is just a start and we find many places/scripts to update it | 20:13 |
| jrosser | well no one except me or noonedeadpunk are on the hook for that in osa | 20:14 |
| gmann | setting up devstck/tempest testing for unmaintained is also good amount of work | 20:14 |
| jrosser | and we have dozens of repos | 20:14 |
| gmann | i understand that. and I am also realizing that moving vwx also to unmaintained adding a lot of work. | 20:16 |
| jrosser | while I’m on this - the deployment tools often stretch the support beyond what the other projects do | 20:17 |
| jrosser | that now super difficult as we have to somehow deal with changing branch names underneath something we still consider supported from an end user POV | 20:17 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_nova stable/2023.1: Evaluate my_ip address once https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_nova/+/908699 | 21:58 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!