Monday, 2024-09-23

opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-openstack_hosts master: Manage apt repositores and keys using deb822_repository module  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-openstack_hosts/+/90743409:28
noonedeadpunkmorinings09:53
noonedeadpunkwould be nice if someone could take a look at https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22osa/apache_mpm_alignment%22 - as I wanan backport them to 2024.1 as well (except repo_server)09:54
noonedeadpunkand yeah - horizon will be switched to mpm event from worker... Will write reno right away09:55
opendevreviewDmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_horizon master: Ensure that selected Apache MPM is enforced  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_horizon/+/92969509:59
opendevreviewDmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Add global release note for Apache MPM alignment  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/93018510:11
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_neutron stable/2023.1: Use cgroupsv2 for L3 cleanup  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_neutron/+/92900310:14
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_neutron stable/2023.2: Use cgroupsv2 for L3 cleanup  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_neutron/+/92900210:14
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_neutron stable/2024.1: Use cgroupsv2 for L3 cleanup  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_neutron/+/92900110:14
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_neutron stable/2023.2: Disable uWSGI usage by default  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_neutron/+/92955010:14
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_neutron stable/2023.1: Disable uWSGI usage by default  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_neutron/+/92955110:14
opendevreviewDmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_neutron stable/2023.2: Do not kill ipsec on L3 cleanup  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_neutron/+/93018610:14
opendevreviewDmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_neutron stable/2023.1: Do not kill ipsec on L3 cleanup  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_neutron/+/93018710:15
opendevreviewDmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_neutron stable/2024.1: Do not kill ipsec on L3 cleanup  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_neutron/+/93018810:15
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_octavia stable/2024.1: Return `amphora` provider back  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_octavia/+/92899910:17
opendevreviewDmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Fix upgrade job on master to upgrade from 2024.1 to master  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/92877110:19
noonedeadpunkand this is also quite good bugfix for centos: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-openstack_hosts/+/92954010:21
jrossershould we add that to the base image for rh-like containers?10:39
noonedeadpunkoh, that's a good point10:40
noonedeadpunkmaybe we should add all of these there ?:)10:41
noonedeadpunkbut well, frankly I'm not sure if that's needed "for real" anywhere except utility.10:41
noonedeadpunkas what I saw (as well as reporters) that it was enough to install on utility10:42
noonedeadpunkand it was used basically only by mysql collection10:42
noonedeadpunkso probably having it everywhere is excessive, given that selinux in fact looks like disabled....10:42
noonedeadpunkbut then smth apparently goes off for centos, as rocky doesn't need it yet anywhere...10:43
noonedeadpunkso smth makes ansible think it needs selinux bindings for some modules10:43
gokhanhello noonedeadpunk , I solved issue about masakari. the failure is bacause of disable_ipmi_check=false. it gets  Failed to get params of ipmi RA error. after changing disable_ipmi_check from false to true it worked.   12:58
gokhanbut if we are using pacemaker-corosync we also need https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/masakari/+/788382 commit. because if nova compute service is actually is not down, it can not disable nova compute service. may be using consul instead of pacemaker-corosync is best choice.  13:00
noonedeadpunkoh, yes, totally, evacuate doesn't work if nova does't mark service as down. Though I'm not sure this patch is *needed* per say13:01
noonedeadpunkas masakari has timeouts/retries from scratch to handle that13:02
noonedeadpunkas I can recall even Train was working that way. So you can set amount of retries and sleep beteween timouts while masakari-engine will wait for nova to mark service as down13:03
noonedeadpunkalso hashicorp is not having opensource license, so this is smth we will not deploy I assume13:03
noonedeadpunkthough I guess there should be possibility to mark pacemaker as optional and deploy whatever user wants for cluster monitoring13:04
noonedeadpunkif you'd ask me - I even not sure why there is no "native" driver, which would jsut check on nova service list and action on compute service going down in nova...13:05
noonedeadpunkwould make total sense for me...13:05
noonedeadpunkbut -ENOTIME13:05
gokhanindeed this patch also handles timeouts and waiting for nova compute to be down, 13:09
noonedeadpunkthere were waits even before13:09
noonedeadpunkwhat this patch is doing - it's disabling timeouts if it detects that nova is already down13:10
noonedeadpunkso it's more quality of life improvement then smth too crucial, imo13:10
gokhanI also added eventlet sleep before disabling nova compute 13:10
gokhanI added there https://github.com/openstack/masakari/blob/02bf0d3ed792c27b60b9a559366fba95547bf6da/masakari/compute/nova.py#L15213:11
jrossersurprising failure across the board for noble here https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/928771?tab=change-view-tab-header-zuul-results-summary14:11
mgariepywe do not sync sources.list.d from host the hosts ?14:23
mgariepyor the directory is really missing ?14:23
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible stable/2024.1: Verify OS for containers installation  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/92858914:49
noonedeadpunkthere was some patch for sources.list.d creation?15:58
noonedeadpunkI can recall this being reported a week ago or so15:58
jrosseri thought that was something i had to deal with inside the containers for sure15:59
noonedeadpunkbut these are metal, yeah15:59
jrosserhttps://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-lxc_hosts/+/92430915:59
noonedeadpunkcould be new image...15:59
jrosserso maybe the same thing is true for the host15:59
noonedeadpunkmore "minimal" or smth15:59
noonedeadpunkhttps://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_horizon/+/929695? also failed today on same thing - was passing last week16:01
noonedeadpunkah, yes, you wrote that it is across the board16:01
WireLosthi guys, is it possible to deploy Skyline with OSA master?18:19
jrosserWireLost: it should be ok, yes19:07
WireLostjrosser, is it enabled by default, or should I explicitly enable it somehow?19:32
jrosseryou need to enable it explicitly19:50
jrosserthe inventory contains the env.d definition for skyline already19:51
jrosserhttps://github.com/openstack/openstack-ansible/blob/master/inventory/env.d/skyline.yml19:51
jrosserso you would enable it in your openstack_user_config.yml with something like this https://github.com/openstack/openstack-ansible/blob/master/etc/openstack_deploy/conf.d/skyline.yml.aio19:52
jrosserjust like the other services19:52
jrosserthere is of course a decision to make if you want to have horizon and skyline at the same time, which can be done, with caveats19:53
jrosseror just one of them19:53
WireLostthanks!20:51

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!