| opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_tempest master: Remove support for sahara and senlin https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_tempest/+/951053 | 01:33 |
|---|---|---|
| opendevreview | OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Imported Translations from Zanata https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/951085 | 05:31 |
| noonedeadpunk | good morning | 08:29 |
| opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible stable/2025.1: [doc] Update doc for the stable branch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/950428 | 08:29 |
| noonedeadpunk | this was the patch to update docs for Epoxy ^ | 08:29 |
| noonedeadpunk | I am going also to propose change change to the master branch to remove all this release history... And let's held discussion in there | 08:30 |
| noonedeadpunk | As while we divert in term of release dates, I'm not sure how valuable to have that still | 08:30 |
| opendevreview | Denys Mishchenko proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-haproxy_server master: Temp directory for pki certificates https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-haproxy_server/+/951102 | 09:22 |
| opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: [doc] Remove historical information from the index page https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/951113 | 10:45 |
| opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: [doc] Add release codename to formal_name https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/951116 | 11:05 |
| opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: [doc] Remove note about --file argument https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/951121 | 11:10 |
| opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: [doc] Remove historical information from the index page https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/951113 | 11:18 |
| opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: [doc] Add release codename to formal_name https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/951116 | 11:21 |
| opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Do not require full git & autoconf on EL https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/951124 | 11:43 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/openstack-ansible master: Imported Translations from Zanata https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/951085 | 11:47 |
| opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Do not require full git & autoconf on EL https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/951124 | 12:09 |
| noonedeadpunk | NeilHanlon: hey! around? As David seems to be not in channel now... | 12:41 |
| noonedeadpunk | As I'm having a EL SIG mirror question | 12:41 |
| noonedeadpunk | particularly - why this is empty https://mirror.stream.centos.org/SIGs/10/ | 12:41 |
| noonedeadpunk | and I assume that 10-stream is a completely different one | 12:42 |
| mnasiadka | 10-stream is the one you're looking for - there is only kmods for 10, since it's building against rhel10 kernels (and clones) | 12:51 |
| mnasiadka | the ones under 9 are from pre-stream ages | 12:51 |
| noonedeadpunk | mnasiadka: I have a very weird feeling, that 10-stream will break badly on Rocky and EL | 12:51 |
| mnasiadka | what repos are you referring to? nfv sig? | 12:52 |
| noonedeadpunk | like plenty of stuff already does on 9 even, ie with late openssl 3.3 requirement | 12:52 |
| noonedeadpunk | I did not come that far :) | 12:52 |
| noonedeadpunk | hyperscale atm | 12:52 |
| noonedeadpunk | but nfv is totally in the list | 12:53 |
| mnasiadka | we've been using 9-stream nfv sig packages on rocky9 | 12:54 |
| mnasiadka | I don't even know what hyper scale sig delivers :) | 12:54 |
| noonedeadpunk | systemd-networkd... | 12:54 |
| noonedeadpunk | which in 10 not part of main repos | 12:54 |
| noonedeadpunk | like it always was | 12:55 |
| mnasiadka | ah, we're using NM on EL9 | 12:56 |
| mnasiadka | and we'll continue on EL10 | 12:56 |
| noonedeadpunk | we got fed up with each distro using their thing, and systemd-networkd works nicely and universally across all of them | 12:56 |
| noonedeadpunk | so yeah... | 12:57 |
| noonedeadpunk | I guess my kind of question was, if I should be expecting 10 to be populated and do logic for Rocky - use 10, for CentOS use 10-stream | 12:58 |
| NeilHanlon | mnasiadka and i were sorta having this discussion last week about some stuff... | 12:58 |
| noonedeadpunk | or just use 10-stream universaly, which feels very wrong | 12:58 |
| * noonedeadpunk trailing behind a bit | 12:59 | |
| NeilHanlon | it's probably OK to use the hyperscale stuff for el10 | 12:59 |
| NeilHanlon | the stream things, i mean | 12:59 |
| mnasiadka | NeilHanlon: actually NFV SIG got a bit more lively, but I would feel more secure if we could rebuild OVS/OVN from RHEL FDP srpms ;-) | 12:59 |
| noonedeadpunk | mnasiadka: are you using EL for real? | 13:00 |
| NeilHanlon | oh did it? I didn't see any replies to your centos-devel message | 13:00 |
| mnasiadka | NeilHanlon: no replies, but I noticed today new packages and commits to git.centos.org/rpms/ovn | 13:00 |
| NeilHanlon | ah, that's good | 13:00 |
| mnasiadka | noonedeadpunk: I am, commercially we support Rocky and Ubuntu | 13:01 |
| NeilHanlon | i tend to agree it'd be safer to just go direct from FDP | 13:01 |
| NeilHanlon | especially given the ABI compat issues we've seen with ovn stuff | 13:01 |
| noonedeadpunk | aha, ok, gotcha | 13:01 |
| NeilHanlon | i think the systemd stuff is a bit safer, but could easily be rebuilt as well | 13:02 |
| NeilHanlon | i'm technically part of both the NFV and HS sigs | 13:02 |
| noonedeadpunk | yeah, so the reason why I decided to summon you | 13:04 |
| noonedeadpunk | just started looking at Stream 10 locally and push something to begin withy | 13:05 |
| opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Add CentOS Stream 10 to molecule tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/951132 | 13:05 |
| noonedeadpunk | I also can recall you've built gluster for us... But can't recall where it was.. your CORP? | 13:05 |
| opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/ansible-role-systemd_networkd master: Add EL10 support to the role https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-role-systemd_networkd/+/951137 | 13:21 |
| mnasiadka | noonedeadpunk: I think we’re close to merging both glean and DIB stream 10 support | 13:26 |
| noonedeadpunk | that would be extremely cool | 13:27 |
| noonedeadpunk | but it feels quite a long way to get support to it :( | 13:28 |
| noonedeadpunk | We're jsut not using EL anywhere, so prio for it's support is kind of arguable | 13:32 |
| NeilHanlon | yeah noonedeadpunk: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/neil/glusterfs | 13:33 |
| noonedeadpunk | thanks! | 13:33 |
| noonedeadpunk | omg, hyperscale contains more modern systemd then system and requires an upgrade... | 13:38 |
| noonedeadpunk | this somehow very scary in context of stream and el | 13:39 |
| opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/ansible-role-systemd_networkd master: Add EL10 support to the role https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-role-systemd_networkd/+/951137 | 13:40 |
| opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Add AIO bootstrap support for EL10 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/951140 | 13:41 |
| opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-plugins master: Update supported platforms for host setup https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-plugins/+/951142 | 13:46 |
| NeilHanlon | yeah.. i will say the hyperscale folks are good about not breaking things, but it _is_ a newer systemd | 13:49 |
| noonedeadpunk | ok, I have another stupid question..... | 13:56 |
| noonedeadpunk | how have that happened that a new gpg keys are uploaded to https://www.centos.org/keys/ but they have the same dates/ids? | 13:56 |
| noonedeadpunk | and are they compatible with Rocky 9 still... | 13:58 |
| noonedeadpunk | oh... so despite content is different, checksum is the same? | 13:59 |
| noonedeadpunk | wtf | 13:59 |
| noonedeadpunk | nah, it's not same | 13:59 |
| noonedeadpunk | but gpg signature is the same | 14:00 |
| noonedeadpunk | https://paste.openstack.org/show/bDzGFFzrL5l5yaEblvWr/ | 14:01 |
| NeilHanlon | huh... | 14:09 |
| NeilHanlon | maybe someone exported w/ signatures? | 14:09 |
| noonedeadpunk | dunno | 14:26 |
| opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/ansible-role-systemd_networkd master: Add EL10 support to the role https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-role-systemd_networkd/+/951137 | 14:50 |
| opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Do not enable ebtables on modern kernels https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/951160 | 15:11 |
| opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-openstack_hosts master: Add support for EL10 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-openstack_hosts/+/951161 | 15:12 |
| opendevreview | Denys Mishchenko proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-haproxy_server master: Temp directory for pki certificates https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-haproxy_server/+/951102 | 15:34 |
| opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-lxc_hosts master: Do not install COPR repo for CentOS LXC https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-lxc_hosts/+/843672 | 15:45 |
| opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-lxc_hosts master: Do not install COPR repo for CentOS LXC https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-lxc_hosts/+/843672 | 15:46 |
| opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-lxc_hosts master: Do not install COPR repo for CentOS LXC https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-lxc_hosts/+/843672 | 15:50 |
| noonedeadpunk | Well, this is not gonna work :( ^ | 16:15 |
| noonedeadpunk | NeilHanlon: any guess where LXC has gone for EL10? And can yuou build lxc packages in your copr?:) | 16:18 |
| NeilHanlon | i might be able to just get it in EPEL... let me see... | 16:19 |
| noonedeadpunk | that would be amazing | 16:23 |
| opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-lxc_hosts master: Do not use distro templates by default https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-lxc_hosts/+/951177 | 16:43 |
| opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-lxc_hosts master: Do not install COPR repo for CentOS LXC https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-lxc_hosts/+/843672 | 16:43 |
| noonedeadpunk | this seems to work nicely in my AIO ^ | 16:45 |
| noonedeadpunk | so if EL10 LXC will be added to EPEL - we'd better backport it to 2025.1 | 16:46 |
| opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-lxc_hosts master: Do not use distro templates by default https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-lxc_hosts/+/951177 | 17:15 |
| opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-lxc_hosts master: Do not use distro templates by default https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-lxc_hosts/+/951177 | 17:17 |
| opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-lxc_hosts master: Do not install COPR repo for CentOS LXC https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-lxc_hosts/+/843672 | 17:17 |
| opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-lxc_hosts master: Do not install COPR repo for CentOS LXC https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-lxc_hosts/+/843672 | 18:23 |
| opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-lxc_hosts master: Do not install COPR repo for CentOS LXC https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-lxc_hosts/+/843672 | 18:23 |
| noonedeadpunk | about ^. Ubuntu, alike to Debian, does contain bunch of extra parameters for containers by default, before this patch | 18:42 |
| noonedeadpunk | ie https://paste.openstack.org/show/bWW4OB6hfV7cqDes4SVe/ | 18:43 |
| noonedeadpunk | but centos and rocky do not | 18:43 |
| noonedeadpunk | thus, I have a question.... | 18:43 |
| noonedeadpunk | first of all, this totally could contribute why inside of docker centos pam does not want to work | 18:44 |
| noonedeadpunk | but also - do we want to bring them to default config? | 18:45 |
| noonedeadpunk | as it looks like, we might not _really_ need them | 18:45 |
| noonedeadpunk | wow | 18:49 |
| noonedeadpunk | zuul has out-of-the-box graphs for jobs runtime now | 18:49 |
| -opendevstatus- NOTICE: The Gerrit service on review.opendev.org is temporarily unreachable due to an ongoing issue in the hosting provider where it resides | 22:06 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 4.0.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!