| noonedeadpunk | good morning | 06:51 |
|---|---|---|
| noonedeadpunk | we should decide smth on the fate of https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/949497 as it's in almost constant rebase conflict | 08:11 |
| noonedeadpunk | also - are we good with proxy/aio thing here, when a separate interface for it is provisioned? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/955498 | 08:14 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/openstack-ansible-repo_server stable/2025.1: Fix role idempotency https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-repo_server/+/956075 | 09:58 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_ironic stable/2025.1: Add apparmor rules for ironic inspector https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_ironic/+/951914 | 10:05 |
| opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible stable/2025.1: Bump SHAs for 2025.1 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/956461 | 11:15 |
| opendevreview | Damian Dąbrowski proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_neutron master: Add hashi_vault pki backend support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_neutron/+/949420 | 12:06 |
| noonedeadpunk | 2025.1 bump is ready for reviews: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/956461 | 13:52 |
| darkhackernc | noonedeadpunk++ | 14:13 |
| darkhackernc | noonedeadpunk++ thank you | 15:43 |
| opendevreview | Damian Dąbrowski proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_neutron master: Add hashi_vault pki backend support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_neutron/+/949420 | 16:59 |
| jrosser | damiandabrowski: shall we make the `mode` parameter for these cert/key installations have some default values? we can leverage `type` now to do that I think? | 17:03 |
| damiandabrowski | I think it's a good idea, Dmitry suggested that here: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_neutron/+/949420/comment/3ee5930f_3ed93cb3/ | 17:06 |
| damiandabrowski | but we need to decide who and how will add a support for this in standalone backend | 17:07 |
| damiandabrowski | I was wondering if it's something that can be included in this patch: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-role-pki/+/954239/17 | 17:07 |
| damiandabrowski | or we need another one | 17:07 |
| jrosser | we definatly can add it there - i can look at that, but i was cautious about having to rebase all your patches | 17:08 |
| jrosser | but maybe thats not so bad really? | 17:08 |
| damiandabrowski | don't worry about them, I can rebase my patches as soon as yours is ready :D | 17:09 |
| jrosser | or i can make another small patch on top of that, which would maybe be clearer | 17:09 |
| jrosser | ok cool i will take a look hopefully very soon | 17:09 |
| damiandabrowski | thanks! | 17:10 |
| jrosser | i will do something like stick a mapping of `type` to default mode in vars/ then all the backends can refer to that | 17:10 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/openstack-ansible stable/2025.1: Bump SHAs for 2025.1 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/956461 | 22:34 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 4.0.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!