| opendevreview | OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Imported Translations from Zanata https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/963651 | 04:16 |
|---|---|---|
| *** DmitriyRabotyagov[m] is now known as noonedeadpunk[e] | 08:06 | |
| opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/ansible-role-uwsgi master: Replace libssl3 with libssl3t64 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-role-uwsgi/+/963935 | 09:42 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/openstack-ansible master: Imported Translations from Zanata https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/963651 | 13:33 |
| opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Unfreeze roles after Flamingo Beta release https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/963970 | 14:37 |
| noonedeadpunk | #startmeeting openstack_ansible_meeting | 15:05 |
| opendevmeet | Meeting started Tue Oct 14 15:05:28 2025 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is noonedeadpunk. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 15:05 |
| opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 15:05 |
| opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'openstack_ansible_meeting' | 15:05 |
| noonedeadpunk | #topic rollcall | 15:05 |
| noonedeadpunk | o/ | 15:05 |
| noonedeadpunk | sorry for being late | 15:05 |
| NeilHanlon | o/ | 15:05 |
| DavidGomez | o/ | 15:05 |
| NeilHanlon | also running a bit late and have to run soon 😅 | 15:05 |
| noonedeadpunk | courtesy ping jrosser | 15:06 |
| jrosser | o/ hello | 15:07 |
| noonedeadpunk | #topic ofccie hours | 15:07 |
| noonedeadpunk | DavidGomez: NeilHanlon do you have any news on Ceph front? | 15:07 |
| damiandabrowski | hi! | 15:08 |
| DavidGomez | Started some PRs related to infra to build Ceph for Rocky SIG/Storage, few tickets opened too. I have some PRs to make related to release packages next I'll try and get that done this week. After that is once infra is in place is actual builds and testing | 15:10 |
| noonedeadpunk | oh, sweet | 15:11 |
| noonedeadpunk | great news, thanks! | 15:11 |
| noonedeadpunk | We need to pick up a time slot for PTG | 15:12 |
| noonedeadpunk | Which will be in 2 weeks | 15:12 |
| noonedeadpunk | I don't think we have a lot of topic to discuss, so would suggest smth like 2h tops | 15:13 |
| noonedeadpunk | (our etherpad is literally empty so far) | 15:13 |
| noonedeadpunk | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/oct2025-ptg-os-ansible | 15:13 |
| noonedeadpunk | I'd suggest smth like Tuesday 15 - 17 UTC, but I see it's conflicting with the TC slot :( | 15:16 |
| noonedeadpunk | we can do 14 - 16, but that is kinda too early for EST timezone... | 15:17 |
| noonedeadpunk | or well, it's early only for PST? | 15:17 |
| damiandabrowski | I'm starting vacation on 28th, so most likely I'll miss PTG :/ | 15:18 |
| noonedeadpunk | Yes, jsut in case we're talking about Oct 27 - 31 | 15:19 |
| noonedeadpunk | Hm, maybe we can do it on 27th? | 15:20 |
| damiandabrowski | yeah yeah, so only Monday works for me. But I don't want to be a person who forces everyone to have a PTG on Monday only because of my vacation :D | 15:20 |
| noonedeadpunk | schedule is kinda really empty on Monday: https://ptg.opendev.org/ptg.html | 15:20 |
| noonedeadpunk | jrosser: what about your plans? | 15:21 |
| jrosser | oh let me look | 15:21 |
| jrosser | monday is good, 27th | 15:25 |
| noonedeadpunk | ok, nice, 15 - 17 UTC? | 15:25 |
| damiandabrowski | perfect! | 15:25 |
| jrosser | yes thats fine | 15:25 |
| noonedeadpunk | NeilHanlon: any opinion an that ^ ?:) | 15:25 |
| jrosser | tbh i am not sure at all how much we have to discuss | 15:26 |
| damiandabrowski | +1 | 15:26 |
| jrosser | i am finding it very difficult to find time on actual OSA code for some time now | 15:26 |
| noonedeadpunk | well. we can discuss on how and if we wanna move forward from where we are as well | 15:27 |
| noonedeadpunk | with limited resources and limited review capacity | 15:27 |
| jrosser | maybe we think of one big thing to all look at | 15:27 |
| jrosser | perhaps proxysql or something | 15:27 |
| noonedeadpunk | oh, yes, wanna do that for a while really know | 15:27 |
| jrosser | so ideas like that would be great to discuss | 15:28 |
| noonedeadpunk | we have a repo ready to accept code for years now | 15:28 |
| noonedeadpunk | https://opendev.org/openstack/ansible-role-proxysql | 15:28 |
| noonedeadpunk | I just failing year after year to put any reasonable effort to make it happen | 15:28 |
| noonedeadpunk | we also are having ansible-core 2.19 which is more ansible-core 3.0 tbh | 15:29 |
| mnasiadka | oh, ansible-core 2.19 is nice pain | 15:29 |
| noonedeadpunk | I already found that our modules don't like it at all | 15:29 |
| noonedeadpunk | mnasiadka: have you already started working on it? | 15:30 |
| noonedeadpunk | As I think my huge concern is on how to catch all potentially problematic conditions | 15:30 |
| noonedeadpunk | given that there's no type conversion or smth like that | 15:30 |
| noonedeadpunk | so you can't do just `if list` like you could | 15:31 |
| mnasiadka | noonedeadpunk: yeah, we did - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/960333 | 15:32 |
| noonedeadpunk | wow | 15:32 |
| noonedeadpunk | ok | 15:32 |
| noonedeadpunk | I see | 15:32 |
| mnasiadka | Basically we need to support 2.19, because it’s how Kolla-Ansible release cadence is done - we bump one version each cycle (we test 2.18 and 2.19 in Flamingo in theory, but 2.19 is complicated). We don’t really backport Ansible version support. | 15:33 |
| noonedeadpunk | mnasiadka: do you know if ansible-lint already catches that? | 15:33 |
| mnasiadka | I don’t know, our ansible-lint ,,framework’’ needs a lot of work :) | 15:33 |
| noonedeadpunk | we do around same fwiw | 15:33 |
| mnasiadka | We use some old version with a lot of exceptions | 15:33 |
| noonedeadpunk | because when I tried ansible-lint during 2.19 being in beta it was isntantly crashing with stack trace | 15:34 |
| mnasiadka | Would probably make sense to make it better, but with 3-4 active cores it’s a bit hard :) | 15:34 |
| noonedeadpunk | and I don't have time to check on that after release | 15:34 |
| noonedeadpunk | we're exactly in the same boat here. | 15:34 |
| noonedeadpunk | yeah, so catching all these conditions everywhere sounds indeed like a huge pita | 15:35 |
| noonedeadpunk | oh, well. we actually support only 1 ansible-core version , not 2 | 15:36 |
| noonedeadpunk | anyway, that looks super fun indeed | 15:36 |
| mnasiadka | Well, I think there’s a config knob you can use to make majority of these new things go away, but still that’s some work - and you need to fix it sooner or later | 15:37 |
| noonedeadpunk | we are not having multi-repo, so it's a knob 20 times... | 15:37 |
| noonedeadpunk | or well. a bot :) | 15:37 |
| noonedeadpunk | I guess that is why I was asking about ansible-lint, because it used to have an auto-fix feature | 15:38 |
| mnasiadka | Right, it’s easier for us - we only have two repos (kolla-ansible and ansible-collection-kolla) | 15:38 |
| mnasiadka | And there’s Kayobe, but it’s another boat :) | 15:38 |
| damiandabrowski | FYI, my PKI patches are ready for reviews | 15:44 |
| damiandabrowski | #link https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22osa_hashi_vault%22+and+status:open | 15:44 |
| noonedeadpunk | Oh, yes, sure, thanks for the update! | 15:45 |
| damiandabrowski | i think there's only one active discussion left: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-role-pki/+/948881/comment/ee0404e1_b5ac6aae/ | 15:45 |
| noonedeadpunk | I'd say I'll try to review them... But the truth is that I'm having a plane to summit tomorrow morning | 15:45 |
| damiandabrowski | on last meeting I promised to do something, but when I started working on it, it turned out to be quite problematic :/ | 15:45 |
| damiandabrowski | no worries | 15:46 |
| damiandabrowski | btw. do you know why jobs are not triggered after recheck here? | 15:46 |
| damiandabrowski | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/948889 | 15:46 |
| noonedeadpunk | um, no, not at first look | 15:49 |
| opendevreview | Damian DÄ…browski proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Enable openbao jobs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/948889 | 15:51 |
| damiandabrowski | ahh, one of the dependent changes was abandoned. That might be an issue | 15:52 |
| noonedeadpunk | yeah, just wanted to say thay likely realted to dependent changes | 15:53 |
| noonedeadpunk | there were also comments about trying to use smarter defaults for ther "backend" itself, but I had not time so far to think about what we can simplify | 15:56 |
| *** gmaan_pto is now known as gmaan | 16:00 | |
| noonedeadpunk | damiandabrowski: it's running now | 16:00 |
| noonedeadpunk | I have also proposed releases, except 2024.1 | 16:01 |
| noonedeadpunk | along with unfreeze of roles: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/963970 | 16:01 |
| noonedeadpunk | this we need to merge before we merge anything else ^ | 16:01 |
| noonedeadpunk | #endmeeting | 16:02 |
| opendevmeet | Meeting ended Tue Oct 14 16:02:22 2025 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 16:02 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/openstack_ansible_meeting/2025/openstack_ansible_meeting.2025-10-14-15.05.html | 16:02 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/openstack_ansible_meeting/2025/openstack_ansible_meeting.2025-10-14-15.05.txt | 16:02 |
| opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/openstack_ansible_meeting/2025/openstack_ansible_meeting.2025-10-14-15.05.log.html | 16:02 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/openstack-ansible stable/2024.1: Revert "Do not disable configure_mirrors extra repos for debian" https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/963207 | 17:58 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 4.0.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!