Saturday, 2024-12-21

noonedeadpunkjrosser: sorry, just get to the laptop. I was thinking if using `RabbitMQ start` rather then `RabbitMQ restart` would be better? As we wanna ensure it's started after all, right?09:06
opendevreviewDmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Start 2025.1 (Epoxy) development  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/93664409:07
noonedeadpunkwill also proceed with qdrouterd repository retirement next week09:08
jrosserwe also need to drop the jammy jobs and switch a bunch to noble09:09
jrosserstart vs restart yes we can change that09:10
noonedeadpunkwell. then we need either to backport noble to 2024.1? as we can't drop jammy for 2025.1 completely09:12
noonedeadpunkbut yes, switching "main" distro to test - that what we need to do indeed09:12
jrosseroh - well I don’t know - I guess I am confused by slurp again :)09:12
opendevreviewDmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-rabbitmq_server master: Service must always be restarted during an upgrade  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-rabbitmq_server/+/93805109:13
noonedeadpunkwe can drop jammy only for 2025.209:13
noonedeadpunkas upgrade path 2024.1 -> 2025.1 should be present on the same platform09:13
jrosserah ok - I was looking at ansible 2.18 upgrade so I think we cannot do that yet09:17
noonedeadpunkunless do a separate python version for deploy host09:20
noonedeadpunkthere's 3.11 available as secondary version09:21
noonedeadpunkbut probably easier to stick with 2.17 for 2025.109:21
noonedeadpunkbtw, found anything around gather_subset deprecation?09:27

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!