Tuesday, 2014-09-16

*** bdpayne has quit IRC00:17
*** juantwo_ has joined #openstack-barbican00:53
*** juantwo has quit IRC00:54
*** juantwo_ has quit IRC01:03
*** juantwo has joined #openstack-barbican01:03
*** gyee has quit IRC01:27
*** lisaclark1 has joined #openstack-barbican01:28
*** bubbva_ has quit IRC01:30
*** bubbva_ has joined #openstack-barbican01:30
*** bdpayne has joined #openstack-barbican02:14
*** woodster_ has quit IRC02:15
*** lisaclark1 has quit IRC02:34
*** kebray has joined #openstack-barbican02:44
*** jamielennox is now known as jamielennox|away02:52
*** ayoung has quit IRC02:53
*** kebray has quit IRC04:04
*** juantwo has quit IRC05:02
*** bdpayne has quit IRC05:19
*** bdpayne has joined #openstack-barbican05:20
openstackgerritOpenStack Proposal Bot proposed a change to openstack/barbican: Imported Translations from Transifex  https://review.openstack.org/12175806:08
*** bdpayne has quit IRC06:09
*** LarsN has quit IRC11:14
*** LarsN has joined #openstack-barbican11:20
*** LarsN has quit IRC11:25
*** LarsN has joined #openstack-barbican11:43
*** SheenaG1 has joined #openstack-barbican11:44
*** usimha has joined #openstack-barbican12:16
*** woodster_ has joined #openstack-barbican12:52
*** juantwo has joined #openstack-barbican13:10
*** juantwo has quit IRC13:10
*** juantwo has joined #openstack-barbican13:11
*** nkinder has quit IRC13:16
*** juantwo has quit IRC13:21
*** juantwo has joined #openstack-barbican13:21
*** ayoung has joined #openstack-barbican13:36
*** usimha has quit IRC13:45
*** usimha has joined #openstack-barbican13:45
*** ayoung has quit IRC13:45
*** alee_dinner is now known as alee13:47
*** LarsN has quit IRC13:54
*** nkinder has joined #openstack-barbican14:01
*** lisaclark1 has joined #openstack-barbican14:13
*** usimha has quit IRC14:30
*** usimha has joined #openstack-barbican14:31
*** lisaclark1 has quit IRC14:31
*** paul_glass has joined #openstack-barbican14:46
*** jorge_munoz has joined #openstack-barbican14:49
*** bdpayne has joined #openstack-barbican14:53
*** paul_glass has quit IRC15:00
*** ayoung has joined #openstack-barbican15:03
*** bdpayne has quit IRC15:08
*** LarsN_ has joined #openstack-barbican15:18
*** ayoung has quit IRC15:23
*** SheenaG1 has quit IRC15:27
*** atiwari has joined #openstack-barbican15:33
*** ayoung has joined #openstack-barbican15:44
*** LarsN_ is now known as LarsN15:45
*** LarsN has quit IRC15:45
*** LarsN has joined #openstack-barbican15:45
*** SheenaG1 has joined #openstack-barbican15:53
*** kebray has joined #openstack-barbican16:02
*** bdpayne has joined #openstack-barbican16:04
*** bdpayne_ has joined #openstack-barbican16:06
*** bdpayne has quit IRC16:08
*** lisaclark1 has joined #openstack-barbican16:41
*** kebray has quit IRC16:55
*** lisaclark1 has quit IRC16:58
*** lisaclark1 has joined #openstack-barbican16:59
*** lisaclark1 has quit IRC17:02
*** bdpayne_ has quit IRC17:36
*** juantwo_ has joined #openstack-barbican17:38
*** juantwo has quit IRC17:40
*** bdpayne has joined #openstack-barbican17:43
*** bdpayne_ has joined #openstack-barbican17:46
*** bdpayne has quit IRC17:48
*** ametts has joined #openstack-barbican18:15
*** kebray has joined #openstack-barbican18:16
*** kebray has joined #openstack-barbican18:30
*** kebray has quit IRC18:33
*** kebray has joined #openstack-barbican18:34
*** usimha has quit IRC18:35
openstackgerritArvind Tiwari proposed a change to openstack/barbican: Code clean-up due to type order enhancement  https://review.openstack.org/12126919:03
openstackgerritArvind Tiwari proposed a change to openstack/barbican: Code clean-up due to type order enhancement  https://review.openstack.org/12126919:05
*** lisaclark1 has joined #openstack-barbican19:10
*** lisaclark1 has quit IRC19:10
*** lisaclark1 has joined #openstack-barbican19:11
*** dimtruck has joined #openstack-barbican19:21
dimtruckgood afternoon!19:21
chellygelhi there dimtruck :)19:21
dimtruckquick question - we're attempting to integrate barbican as part of our devstack in solum.  We're running into issues where barbican doesn't look like it's starting19:22
*** lisaclark1 has quit IRC19:22
dimtruckwant to make sure we're not screwing anything up...is it possible to have someone take a look for us?  "it works locally" haha19:23
dimtruckso we're thinking it's something to do with our tempest gate hooks19:23
chellygelinteresting! -- im still a little new to the process, but i can try to help...19:25
dimtruckcoolness!19:25
chellygelmany of the other barbicaneers are in classes today -- and they are the experts19:25
dimtruckah yes!19:25
dimtruckcool, thank you chellygel - let me get you the links.19:25
chellygelthanks :)19:26
dimtruckso we set it up http://git.openstack.org/cgit/stackforge/solum/tree/functionaltests/pre_test_hook.sh (we clone and copy proper barbican libs)19:29
dimtruckthen the console output is here: https://jenkins04.openstack.org/job/gate-solum-devstack-dsvm-f20/142/console19:29
dimtruckDetails: {"debuginfo": null, "faultcode": "Server", "faultstring": "Unable to establish connection to http://localhost:9311/v1/secrets/3f7add75-c06b-453f-a893-91d895ed4d88"}19:30
chellygellooking19:30
chellygelhmm, so all the other tests passed except these 2?19:32
dimtruckyes - but those are the only 2 where we talk to barbican19:32
chellygelaha19:32
dimtruckthat ip is to connect to our barbican service that's running locally19:32
chellygeland you *are* able to ping /store secrets locally?19:33
dimtruckyep!19:35
*** bdpayne has joined #openstack-barbican19:35
dimtruck2014-09-16 17:50:39.956 | + export ENABLED_SERVICES=solum,solum-api,solum-build-api,solum-conductor,solum-deployer,solum-worker,tempest,zaqar,barbican,mistral19:36
dimtruck2014-09-16 17:50:39.956 | + ENABLED_SERVICES=solum,solum-api,solum-build-api,solum-conductor,solum-deployer,solum-worker,tempest,zaqar,barbican,mistral19:36
dimtruckhttp://logs.openstack.org/05/105605/18/check/gate-solum-devstack-dsvm-f20/2a809dd/logs/screen-barbican.txt.gz19:38
dimtrucknot sure if any of that looks weird to you19:38
*** bdpayne_ has quit IRC19:38
chellygelim reading it, seeing if i see anything fishy19:38
dimtruck:) thank you!!19:39
chellygelhaha dont say thank you yet -- i may not help at all!!19:39
*** bdpayne has quit IRC19:40
chellygeli am perplexed19:45
chellygel>:/19:45
dimtruckwe're thinking of just doing recheck and seeing if that fixes it19:47
dimtruckit could just be devstack :)19:47
chellygelnothing wrong with doing that anyway -- just to see if you get the same results19:48
chellygelbut that unable to establish connection -- thats what seems strange to me -- but i havent done this before !19:48
*** ametts has quit IRC19:50
dimtruckyeah - we'll keep you updated if that fixes it.  Hopefully :).  It does seems strange since we've all been able to run this locally without any issues...and we spin up devstack and run tests without much intervention.  In any case - thank you for looking at it :)19:50
chellygelsorry dimtruck :((19:51
chellygelbest of luck, look forward to hearing good results!19:51
*** kebray has quit IRC19:53
rm_workdimtruck: /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/sqlalchemy/engine/default.py:324: Warning: Specified key was too long; max key length is 767 bytes19:55
rm_workdimtruck: looks like you have new model/sqlalchemy code?19:55
rm_workdimtruck: that will happen if you have a constraint on a set of columns that total in length greater than a certain number19:56
dimtruckrm_work: awesome!!!!19:56
dimtruckthank you!19:56
rm_workI forget the exact size, but, it combines all columns involved in constraints and the combined size can't exceed some number19:56
*** akoneru has joined #openstack-barbican19:56
rm_workso, what I had to do to get around the problem (since I absolutely needed a huge constraint) was to make a hash field:19:57
rm_workhttps://github.com/openstack/barbican/blob/master/barbican/model/models.py#L64319:57
rm_workand do the constaint on that19:57
dimtruckperfect!  appreciate it!19:57
rm_worknp19:57
rm_workgood luck19:57
rm_workdimtruck: yeah it happens because sqlite (used locally) doesn't have the same constraints on column length for indexes/etc as mysql (which is used on devstack)20:00
rm_workin case you were curious20:00
*** lisaclark1 has joined #openstack-barbican20:00
dimtruckhmm20:00
dimtruckso we use devstack locally as well20:01
rm_workhmm20:01
rm_workwell, it can also depend on your local mysql config20:01
rm_workthough if that's default, it should be the same, I would assume20:01
dimtruckwe vagrant up the entire setup...yeah, that's what we're looking into right now20:01
rm_workwhere's your code?20:01
rm_work(specifically, SQLAlchemy code)20:02
rm_workI can glance at it20:02
openstackgerritAdam Harwell proposed a change to openstack/python-barbicanclient: Add Containers to python-barbicanclient  https://review.openstack.org/11339320:03
dimtruckhttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/105605/20:04
dimtruckyou want the code though...one sec20:04
dimtruckso it looks as though one of the gates passed (ubuntu) but f20 failed20:05
dimtrucksigh20:05
dimtrucki think it's something to do with the way everything started up20:05
dimtruckjust checked and apparently we're getting that error locally as well...20:06
dimtruckhttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/105605/18/solum/objects/sqlalchemy/migration/alembic_migrations/versions/498adc6185ae_create_initial_db_schema.py20:06
rm_workif you get that error, it means it *did not* successfully set up your DB20:06
rm_worki don't know why it isn't a full on ERROR20:06
rm_workit "warns you" that your DB is fail20:06
rm_workand then continues <_<20:06
rm_workand then you spend a day tracking back other problems to the fact that your DB doesn't have the constraints or indexes that you thought you set up, lol20:07
dimtruck:)20:07
*** lisaclark1 has quit IRC20:07
*** kebray has joined #openstack-barbican20:09
dimtruckwe will look into that then - thanks, rm_work20:10
dimtruckstill wondering how it passed on our ubuntu gate (barbican started and ran) but that might speak more to our tests than anything else20:10
*** alee has quit IRC20:12
rm_workhmm, not seeing a constraint using that new column anywhere (or any new constraints, either)20:13
rm_workdimtruck: oh hey, BTW, do you like the barbican.secrets.Secret( ... ) syntax for making new Secrets?20:14
rm_workwe've got an ongoing debate about the way that works...20:14
dimtruckso it was a little confusing at first...because we didn't realize that it was a manager that returned in secrets20:15
dimtruckbut it seemed simpler to use after since we didn't have to pass same data in the methods20:15
rm_workheh20:16
dimtruckbecause we had to refactor the calls from the old code, it probably took ~30 mins...but afterwards it was pretty straightforward20:16
rm_workcurious which way you prefer20:17
*** lisaclark1 has joined #openstack-barbican20:17
dimtrucknot sure yet :).  I'd probably need to work a little with the new api to get a feel.  If you'd like to ask that question on the #solum channel, we had quite a few people who worked with both versions of the api in the past month so you might get a better feel for it20:18
rm_workheh k20:18
dimtrucksorry about being non-committal20:19
rm_worknp :)20:19
rm_workyou are far from the first :P20:19
*** bdpayne has joined #openstack-barbican20:20
openstackgerritArvind Tiwari proposed a change to openstack/barbican: Add asymmtric order validator  https://review.openstack.org/11869720:20
*** bdpayne_ has joined #openstack-barbican20:21
*** alee has joined #openstack-barbican20:22
*** bdpayne has quit IRC20:25
openstackgerritAdam Harwell proposed a change to openstack/python-barbicanclient: Change object __str__() to use pretty formatting  https://review.openstack.org/11849420:32
*** lisaclark1 has quit IRC20:54
*** lisaclark1 has joined #openstack-barbican20:56
*** juantwo_ has quit IRC20:56
*** kebray has quit IRC21:00
*** lisaclark1 has quit IRC21:03
*** lisaclark1 has joined #openstack-barbican21:03
*** lisaclark1 has quit IRC21:10
aleewoodster_, jvrbanac - hey - could we start getting some eyes in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/117845 ?21:26
openstackgerritmeera-belur proposed a change to openstack/barbican: update tests to include X-Project-Id header and add additional tests  https://review.openstack.org/12199121:27
reaperhulkany core member want to take a look at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/120905/ and https://review.openstack.org/#/c/120904/ to give them workflow? They're pretty easy changes to review21:31
*** lisaclark1 has joined #openstack-barbican21:42
*** lisaclark1 has quit IRC21:51
*** ravips has joined #openstack-barbican21:56
*** ametts has joined #openstack-barbican22:01
openstackgerritA change was merged to openstack/barbican: Imported Translations from Transifex  https://review.openstack.org/12175822:09
*** nkinder has quit IRC22:09
*** atiwari has quit IRC22:09
*** juantwo has joined #openstack-barbican22:22
*** bdpayne__ has joined #openstack-barbican22:31
*** bdpayne_ has quit IRC22:33
*** ametts has quit IRC22:49
*** nkinder has joined #openstack-barbican23:01
*** dimtruck is now known as zz_dimtruck23:04
*** ayoung has quit IRC23:21
*** ryanpetrello has quit IRC23:23

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!