| *** SheenaG has joined #openstack-barbican | 00:04 | |
| *** alee has joined #openstack-barbican | 00:05 | |
| *** SheenaG has left #openstack-barbican | 00:07 | |
| *** chlong has quit IRC | 00:19 | |
| *** jhfeng has quit IRC | 00:33 | |
| *** zz_dimtruck is now known as dimtruck | 00:41 | |
| *** chlong has joined #openstack-barbican | 01:02 | |
| *** lisaclark1 has joined #openstack-barbican | 01:06 | |
| *** chlong has quit IRC | 01:08 | |
| *** lisaclark1 has quit IRC | 01:17 | |
| *** vivek-ebay has quit IRC | 01:19 | |
| *** chlong has joined #openstack-barbican | 01:21 | |
| *** SheenaG has joined #openstack-barbican | 01:37 | |
| *** SheenaG has quit IRC | 01:58 | |
| *** SheenaG has joined #openstack-barbican | 02:04 | |
| *** SheenaG has left #openstack-barbican | 02:09 | |
| *** jhfeng has joined #openstack-barbican | 02:14 | |
| *** tkelsey has joined #openstack-barbican | 02:16 | |
| *** tkelsey has quit IRC | 02:20 | |
| *** dave-mccowan has joined #openstack-barbican | 02:35 | |
| *** dave-mccowan has quit IRC | 02:35 | |
| *** Nirupama has joined #openstack-barbican | 02:39 | |
| *** SheenaG has joined #openstack-barbican | 02:56 | |
| *** SheenaG has left #openstack-barbican | 02:57 | |
| *** gyee has quit IRC | 02:58 | |
| *** ryanpetrello has quit IRC | 03:29 | |
| *** ryanpetrello has joined #openstack-barbican | 03:34 | |
| *** Kevin_Zheng has joined #openstack-barbican | 04:11 | |
| *** dimtruck is now known as zz_dimtruck | 04:18 | |
| *** woodster_ has quit IRC | 05:09 | |
| openstackgerrit | Ade Lee proposed openstack/barbican: Add DELETE functionality for subCAs https://review.openstack.org/222474 | 06:07 |
|---|---|---|
| *** jhfeng has quit IRC | 06:20 | |
| *** shohel has joined #openstack-barbican | 06:28 | |
| *** jaosorior has joined #openstack-barbican | 07:14 | |
| *** tkelsey has joined #openstack-barbican | 07:41 | |
| *** darrenmoffat has quit IRC | 09:14 | |
| *** darrenmoffat has joined #openstack-barbican | 09:15 | |
| *** chlong has quit IRC | 09:16 | |
| *** mmdurrant has quit IRC | 10:09 | |
| *** dave-mccowan has joined #openstack-barbican | 10:57 | |
| *** shohel has quit IRC | 11:02 | |
| *** shohel has joined #openstack-barbican | 11:02 | |
| *** Nirupama has quit IRC | 11:12 | |
| *** Kevin_Zheng has quit IRC | 11:15 | |
| *** yuanying_ has joined #openstack-barbican | 11:33 | |
| *** yuanying has quit IRC | 11:35 | |
| openstackgerrit | Juan Antonio Osorio Robles proposed openstack/barbican: Add functional test for project CA https://review.openstack.org/222583 | 12:00 |
| *** woodster_ has joined #openstack-barbican | 12:07 | |
| jaosorior | need a workflow here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/205041/ and here https://review.openstack.org/#/c/205042/ | 12:11 |
| jaosorior | anybody? | 12:11 |
| *** shohel has quit IRC | 12:23 | |
| *** shohel has joined #openstack-barbican | 12:23 | |
| *** peter-hamilton has joined #openstack-barbican | 12:24 | |
| *** shohel has quit IRC | 12:35 | |
| *** shohel has joined #openstack-barbican | 12:37 | |
| openstackgerrit | Juan Antonio Osorio Robles proposed openstack/barbican: Add functional test for project CA https://review.openstack.org/222583 | 12:37 |
| *** shohel has quit IRC | 12:41 | |
| *** shohel has joined #openstack-barbican | 12:41 | |
| *** peter-hamilton has quit IRC | 12:50 | |
| *** rellerreller has joined #openstack-barbican | 12:58 | |
| jaosorior | rellerreller: Got a couple of workflows to spare? :D | 12:59 |
| rellerreller | jaosorior I'm not sure. My other project is calling my name all day today. | 13:00 |
| rellerreller | jaosorior Can you send me 2-3 items in order of priority? If I get some time I can take a look. | 13:01 |
| jaosorior | rellerreller: These two are cherry-picks from our master branch into the stable/kilo https://review.openstack.org/#/c/205041/ and here https://review.openstack.org/#/c/205042/ | 13:03 |
| jaosorior | they're meant to fix the dogtag gate there | 13:03 |
| jaosorior | the new dogtag gate won't work for stable/kilo, only the old one | 13:04 |
| jaosorior | rellerreller: So in the first one the gate is still not completely fixed, but the subsequent patch actually finishes up fixing it. But, like I said, they're cherry-picks, so they're left as they are | 13:07 |
| *** jorge_munoz has quit IRC | 13:07 | |
| rellerreller | jaosorior what's the deal with the two non-voting gates failing for 205042? | 13:09 |
| jaosorior | rellerreller: It's a cherry pick. When that commit was introduced, it used to work for the dogtag version that was being used | 13:09 |
| jaosorior | the next CR fixes it for the current dogtag version that's being used, but it depends on the changes done in 205042 | 13:10 |
| rellerreller | I'm looking at 205042. | 13:10 |
| rellerreller | I see that most of the gates are working, but two are still failing. | 13:10 |
| jaosorior | ah | 13:11 |
| jaosorior | that one | 13:11 |
| jaosorior | like I mentioned | 13:11 |
| jaosorior | the ones ending in -new will not work | 13:11 |
| jaosorior | those only work in the master branch | 13:11 |
| jaosorior | not in stable/kilo | 13:11 |
| rellerreller | ok | 13:11 |
| jaosorior | So the gate-barbican-devstack-dsvm-new and gate-barbican-dogtag-devstack-dsvm-f21-new are expected to fail in stable/kilo | 13:12 |
| rellerreller | That's because of the version of dogtag? Or why is that? This is more for my own understanding. | 13:12 |
| dave-mccowan | the *-new ones should not be run at all on stable/kilo. we're trying to fix that with a commit to project-infra with https://review.openstack.org/#/c/220370/ | 13:12 |
| rellerreller | I looked at the patches. They seem straight forward. I'll one final pass and vote soon. | 13:12 |
| jaosorior | rellerreller: No, they fail because of the way gates are handled in infra | 13:13 |
| jaosorior | So, apparently the gates are ran as defined in project-config and that applies to both master and stable/kilo | 13:14 |
| jaosorior | problem is, if something changes, they are reflected always in both... so stable/kilo, gate-wise, is actually not that stable | 13:14 |
| dave-mccowan | they don't need to be that way; it was a mistake when the -new ones were added. | 13:16 |
| jaosorior | dave-mccowan: aha, well that's slightly re-asuring | 13:17 |
| rellerreller | jaosorior done and done | 13:18 |
| jaosorior | yay :D | 13:19 |
| jaosorior | rellerreller: Thanks Mr. | 13:19 |
| jaosorior | alee: ping | 13:21 |
| openstackgerrit | Juan Antonio Osorio Robles proposed openstack/barbican: Add functional test for project CA https://review.openstack.org/222583 | 13:24 |
| *** jroll is now known as jtroll | 13:33 | |
| *** jtroll is now known as Guest13730 | 13:34 | |
| *** Guest13730 is now known as jroll | 13:34 | |
| *** mmdurrant has joined #openstack-barbican | 13:46 | |
| *** SheenaG has joined #openstack-barbican | 13:55 | |
| *** SheenaG has left #openstack-barbican | 13:55 | |
| alee | jaosorior, pong | 14:04 |
| jaosorior | uploaded a patch for testing the project CA add/remove. And there I did some enhancement to how CA backends are detected, you might want to use that for the DELETE patch | 14:05 |
| jaosorior | alee https://review.openstack.org/222583 | 14:06 |
| alee | jaosorior, looking | 14:07 |
| jaosorior | alee: Just a fancier decorator to be honest. Nothing revolutionary at all, but it looks better :P | 14:08 |
| jaosorior | alee: Aaaaand the stable/kilo changes finally landed | 14:09 |
| jaosorior | so dogtag gate works in stable/kilo now | 14:09 |
| *** pglass has joined #openstack-barbican | 14:09 | |
| alee | jaosorior, yay! | 14:10 |
| *** xaeth_afk is now known as xaeth | 14:11 | |
| openstackgerrit | Juan Antonio Osorio Robles proposed openstack/barbican: Add functional test for project CA https://review.openstack.org/222583 | 14:15 |
| jaosorior | alee: By the way, I think your commit should go before this one https://review.openstack.org/#/c/221557 | 14:18 |
| jaosorior | dave-mccowan 's commit needs the delete functionality | 14:18 |
| *** spotz_zzz is now known as spotz | 14:23 | |
| alee | jaosorior, looks good although ultimately I think we're going to want a decorator thats even more complicated. | 14:23 |
| alee | jaosorior, essentially it would be nice to have something that says - run this test for these plugins if they are enabled. | 14:24 |
| jaosorior | alee: It already does that | 14:25 |
| jaosorior | Or what do you mean? | 14:26 |
| alee | jaosorior, almost - for instance .. | 14:26 |
| alee | if I have a decorator that says @run_this_for _plugins("dogtag", "snakeoil") | 14:27 |
| alee | it will run through the test twice, selecting the right ca_id each time | 14:27 |
| jaosorior | If you mean that the decorator should actually inject plugin-specific information, that could be done. But I'm guessing it could be possible with the parameterized test decorators | 14:27 |
| jaosorior | so it would be a mixture of the decorator I introduced, and below that would go the parameterized decorator | 14:28 |
| alee | yes | 14:28 |
| alee | doesn't have to go in this patch of course- but I think thats the desired end state | 14:28 |
| dave-mccowan | alee jaosorior how about a base class with generic/abstract CA tests that can be inherited by CA specific classes that injects the CA specific parameters? | 14:29 |
| jaosorior | dave-mccowan: That shouldn't be too hard. I was thinking of one of these days sitting down and defining which tests should be ran for which CA plugin. And there we would see the ones that overlap and such | 14:30 |
| jaosorior | So when that's sorted out, we could write something like that | 14:31 |
| *** zz_dimtruck is now known as dimtruck | 14:31 | |
| alee | dave-mccowan, jaosorior thats not a bad idea but its not just for the catests. Its also the cert order tests | 14:31 |
| jaosorior | true | 14:32 |
| alee | so I think a decorator will be more verstaile | 14:32 |
| alee | that way I dont have to keep X copies of each cert order test | 14:32 |
| alee | and have to make sure I add X copies each time I add a test | 14:33 |
| *** shohel has quit IRC | 14:34 | |
| alee | jaosorior, as to the comment that Dave's CR depends on mine, thats true except that I used some code in ca behaviors that Dave put in his patch. | 14:35 |
| dave-mccowan | alee haha. i was thinking base classes would be more versatile than decorators. but same goal... which ever way works out best for whoever implements it. | 14:35 |
| *** edtubill has joined #openstack-barbican | 14:37 | |
| alee | dave-mccowan, yup although I do like the idea of keeping all that selecting the cas a test will run on in the same place | 14:38 |
| alee | do right off the bat I need to decide which cas a test will run on | 14:38 |
| alee | (and decorators are cool) | 14:39 |
| *** woodster_ has quit IRC | 14:39 | |
| *** morgan has quit IRC | 14:40 | |
| *** morganfainberg has joined #openstack-barbican | 14:40 | |
| alee | dave-mccowan, jaosorior so how do we want to structure all these CRs? | 14:42 |
| dave-mccowan | alee merge them all quick while no one else is looking. :-) | 14:43 |
| alee | dave-mccowan, :) | 14:43 |
| alee | dave-mccowan, jaosorior - I suppose we could take jaosorior patch first, then take mine with the ca behaviors bits from dave-mccowan patch, followed by dave-mccowan patch? | 14:45 |
| alee | that may be the most logical .. or .. | 14:45 |
| *** ccneill has joined #openstack-barbican | 14:46 | |
| alee | the simplest would be to take my patch, then daves, then jaosorior | 14:46 |
| dave-mccowan | alee simplest is mine first, since yours already depends on it and we know both pass the gate if we go in that order. | 14:49 |
| alee | agreed - and then jaosorior on top of that | 14:50 |
| dave-mccowan | is all_but_audit the right user base for post/delete of a CA? seems a little too loose for me. | 14:51 |
| *** ccneill has quit IRC | 14:53 | |
| alee | dave-mccowan, no - I was thinking it should be project admin actually | 14:54 |
| alee | same for creation of cas | 14:54 |
| alee | I was going to circle back to that after this set of commits, but we can look at it now. | 14:55 |
| alee | dave-mccowan, jaosorior do you know how to specify project admin? | 14:55 |
| dave-mccowan | post should be admin-or-creator, delete should be admin. | 14:56 |
| *** lisaclark1 has joined #openstack-barbican | 14:56 | |
| *** morganfainberg has quit IRC | 14:56 | |
| alee | dave-mccowan, so creator should not be able to delete his own subcas? | 14:57 |
| *** morganfainberg has joined #openstack-barbican | 14:57 | |
| dave-mccowan | alee correct. the only difference between admin and creator is the ability to delete. if creators could delete, they would be == to admin. | 14:58 |
| *** lisaclark1 has quit IRC | 14:59 | |
| alee | dave-mccowan, we do this also for secrets? you can put something up but only admin can remove it? | 14:59 |
| *** morganfainberg has quit IRC | 14:59 | |
| *** lisaclark1 has joined #openstack-barbican | 14:59 | |
| dave-mccowan | alee yes. | 15:00 |
| alee | dave-mccowan, I'm inclined to say creating a subca should be an admin operation | 15:01 |
| alee | so both would be rule:admin | 15:02 |
| dave-mccowan | alee i like that. | 15:02 |
| alee | dave-mccowan, ok I'll change to that | 15:04 |
| *** morganfainberg has joined #openstack-barbican | 15:04 | |
| *** morganfainberg has quit IRC | 15:04 | |
| openstackgerrit | Juan Antonio Osorio Robles proposed openstack/barbican: Add functional test for project CA https://review.openstack.org/222583 | 15:04 |
| alee | dave-mccowan, does "rule:admin" mean project admin? | 15:05 |
| alee | dave-mccowan, I'm just wondering because I think we want a higher rule for "certificate_authority:set_global_preferred": "rule:admin", | 15:06 |
| dave-mccowan | i added service-admin for project quotas. you can use that. | 15:06 |
| dave-mccowan | plain old admin is a project admin | 15:07 |
| alee | dave-mccowan, yeah - I was just thinking that | 15:07 |
| *** silos has joined #openstack-barbican | 15:07 | |
| alee | ok thats what I'll use | 15:07 |
| dave-mccowan | afk for lunch... | 15:09 |
| alee | dave-mccowan, early lunch :) | 15:13 |
| alee | dave-mccowan, does this make sense to you? http://fpaste.org/266128/19843741/ | 15:13 |
| *** kfarr has joined #openstack-barbican | 15:17 | |
| *** morgan has joined #openstack-barbican | 15:23 | |
| *** morgan has quit IRC | 15:25 | |
| *** morgan has joined #openstack-barbican | 15:26 | |
| *** morgan has quit IRC | 15:31 | |
| *** morgan has joined #openstack-barbican | 15:31 | |
| *** morgan has quit IRC | 15:35 | |
| *** morgan has joined #openstack-barbican | 15:35 | |
| alee | jaosorior, ping | 15:47 |
| jaosorior | alee: pong | 15:48 |
| alee | jaosorior, hey -- so looking at the comment you made about making sure someone should not be able to delete the snakeoil ca | 15:49 |
| alee | jaosorior, the check is that the ca being deleted must be a ca -- so must have a project_id defined and that it should match the external project id | 15:50 |
| *** kebray has joined #openstack-barbican | 15:50 | |
| alee | jaosorior, I can put that check in the controller, but I can't help thinking this is something that could be checked beforehand like we do the acl stuff. | 15:51 |
| alee | jaosorior, I'm just not sure how to do it | 15:51 |
| jaosorior | alee: Yeah... not sure about it either | 15:51 |
| jaosorior | and I gotta go in 5 min :/ | 15:51 |
| alee | np - for now I'm just put it in the controller and put in a TODO | 15:52 |
| alee | and ask arunkant about it later | 15:52 |
| jaosorior | alee: Can you take over my CR? and check if the test in the bottom of the following file is actually valid? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/222583/5/functionaltests/api/v1/functional/test_cas.py | 15:53 |
| alee | jaosorior, will do thanks! | 15:54 |
| jaosorior | My understanding was that if a project CA is defined, then a user should only be getting that CA when doing get_cas, but that doesn't seem to be the case | 15:54 |
| alee | jaosorior, that is correct -- I was actually surprised it was working :) | 15:54 |
| alee | but I guess it isn;t | 15:55 |
| alee | so yeah - I'll fix it | 15:55 |
| jaosorior | Feel free to take over that CR | 15:55 |
| alee | and rebase on top ofmine | 15:55 |
| alee | jaosorior, will do - thanks! | 15:55 |
| jaosorior | Anyway, gotta go, talk to you guys later | 15:56 |
| *** jaosorior has quit IRC | 15:56 | |
| alee | kfarr, ping | 15:56 |
| *** lisaclark1 has quit IRC | 15:57 | |
| alee | kfarr, it would be nice if you could review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/221557 please | 15:57 |
| alee | kfarr, and https://review.openstack.org/#/c/222474 - although I need to make an update there | 15:58 |
| *** gyee has joined #openstack-barbican | 16:00 | |
| *** yuanying has joined #openstack-barbican | 16:02 | |
| dave-mccowan | alee those policies look good to me | 16:02 |
| alee | dave-mccowan, cool thanks | 16:02 |
| alee | dave-mccowan, lobbying for your quota patch to be approved .. | 16:03 |
| *** yuanying_ has quit IRC | 16:04 | |
| *** chlong has joined #openstack-barbican | 16:05 | |
| *** vivek-ebay has joined #openstack-barbican | 16:08 | |
| *** silos has left #openstack-barbican | 16:23 | |
| *** edtubill has quit IRC | 16:25 | |
| *** vivek-ebay has quit IRC | 16:28 | |
| *** silos has joined #openstack-barbican | 16:31 | |
| kfarr | alee, just saw these, was at lunch, I'll take a look in a little bit! | 16:44 |
| dave-mccowan | alee ping | 16:45 |
| alee | kfarr, thanks | 16:46 |
| alee | dave-mccowan, pong | 16:46 |
| dave-mccowan | alee fyi, i'll be punching out early today and then camping for the weekend totally unplugged. so, if any of my subca related code gives you grief, you're on your own. please feel free to hack away. | 16:47 |
| alee | dave-mccowan, thanks - sounds like fun :) | 16:47 |
| dave-mccowan | alee your policy changes may require functional test changes to set the appropriate user_name= and admin= parameters. | 16:48 |
| alee | dave-mccowan, I'm hoping kfarr approves your CR and we get that merged in | 16:48 |
| alee | dave-mccowan, then any changes needed will be in my CR | 16:49 |
| alee | dave-mccowan, rerunning the functional tests right now | 16:51 |
| *** vivek-ebay has joined #openstack-barbican | 16:53 | |
| arunkant | alee, reading messages today..do you have a question? | 16:56 |
| alee | arunkant, I do - but I'm going to defer till next week if you dont mind | 16:57 |
| arunkant | alee, okay. | 16:57 |
| *** edtubill has joined #openstack-barbican | 17:00 | |
| *** diazjf has quit IRC | 17:10 | |
| *** diazjf has joined #openstack-barbican | 17:10 | |
| *** chlong has quit IRC | 17:34 | |
| *** diazjf has quit IRC | 17:36 | |
| *** spidey has joined #openstack-barbican | 17:40 | |
| *** edtubill has quit IRC | 17:42 | |
| alee | dave-mccowan, till around? | 17:47 |
| dave-mccowan | alee yep | 17:47 |
| alee | dave-mccowan, so I'm trying to run the functional tests | 17:47 |
| alee | dave-mccowan, what project is sent in when we do these requests? | 17:49 |
| alee | dave-mccowan, maybe there isn't one send tin? | 17:51 |
| dave-mccowan | it's set by barbican-functional.conf. the default user is "admin" of project "admin". you can override with other admins and projects listed in that config file. | 17:51 |
| alee | dave-mccowan, let me post up the patch and you can tell me whats wrong .. | 17:52 |
| dave-mccowan | alee the project id is sent as part of the keystone token | 17:52 |
| alee | dave-mccowan, right -- and it should be the same for all requests, right? | 17:53 |
| *** kfarr has quit IRC | 17:54 | |
| dave-mccowan | alee yep, unless you're doing something special. (like if you set the policy for service-admin). i'll look at your patch. | 17:54 |
| openstackgerrit | Ade Lee proposed openstack/barbican: Add DELETE functionality for subCAs https://review.openstack.org/222474 | 17:55 |
| alee | dave-mccowan, ^^ specifically I'm looking at : nosetests functionaltests.api.v1.functional.test_cas:CertificateAuthoritiesTestCase.test_create_and_delete_snakeoil_subca | 17:56 |
| *** lisaclark1 has joined #openstack-barbican | 18:03 | |
| dave-mccowan | alee the test code and policy code are right and worked fine. | 18:03 |
| dave-mccowan | File "/Users/dmccowan/barbican/barbican/tasks/certificate_resources.py", line 240, in delete_subordinate_ca | 18:03 |
| dave-mccowan | ERROR barbican.api.controllers UnauthorizedSubCADelete: Subordinate CA is not owned by this project | 18:04 |
| alee | right - thats confusing to me | 18:04 |
| dave-mccowan | if ca.project_id != external_project_id: | 18:04 |
| dave-mccowan | should be internal project id? | 18:04 |
| alee | ah - could be .. | 18:05 |
| alee | yeah - that sproably it .. | 18:05 |
| dave-mccowan | project_id should always be project.id should always be the internal id. | 18:05 |
| *** darrenmoffat has quit IRC | 18:05 | |
| *** tkelsey has quit IRC | 18:09 | |
| *** spidey has quit IRC | 18:11 | |
| alee | dave-mccowan, yeah - that was it | 18:14 |
| dave-mccowan | \o/ | 18:14 |
| dave-mccowan | alee i would expect enforce_rbac() to do that check, but maybe that's extra code like in the acl policies. | 18:18 |
| alee | right -- I think its acl like code | 18:19 |
| alee | which I'll try to do that way next week | 18:19 |
| *** SheenaG has joined #openstack-barbican | 18:23 | |
| *** SheenaG has left #openstack-barbican | 18:23 | |
| openstackgerrit | Jason Fritcher proposed openstack/barbican-specs: Blueprint defining healthcheck API endpoint. https://review.openstack.org/207317 | 18:37 |
| *** diazjf has joined #openstack-barbican | 18:39 | |
| *** kfarr has joined #openstack-barbican | 18:40 | |
| *** edtubill has joined #openstack-barbican | 18:40 | |
| alee | kfarr, dave-mccowan I workflowed the dave-mccowan CR, the delete CA CR is being sent in momentarily | 18:45 |
| *** everjeje has quit IRC | 18:52 | |
| openstackgerrit | Ade Lee proposed openstack/barbican: Add DELETE functionality for subCAs https://review.openstack.org/222474 | 19:05 |
| alee | dave-mccowan, kfarr - please take a look ^^ | 19:06 |
| alee | rellerreller, if you're available, I could do with another core reviewer too please | 19:07 |
| *** gyee has quit IRC | 19:17 | |
| *** SheenaG has joined #openstack-barbican | 19:25 | |
| *** SheenaG has left #openstack-barbican | 19:25 | |
| redrobot | silos ping | 19:28 |
| redrobot | actually never mind | 19:28 |
| redrobot | diazjf | 19:28 |
| redrobot | diazjf ping ! | 19:28 |
| silos | redrobot :( | 19:30 |
| diazjf | redrobot, pong | 19:30 |
| redrobot | diazjf hey, I don't think I'll be able to do a hangout today... but I'll review client CRs over the weekend | 19:30 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/barbican: Add Project Quota Support for Sub CAs https://review.openstack.org/221557 | 19:31 |
| diazjf | redrobot, no worries, dave-mccowan had a good suggestion for https://review.openstack.org/#/c/218396/ so I may just alter the code soon | 19:32 |
| openstackgerrit | Fernando Diaz proposed openstack/barbican: Use testr for running functional tests and documentation https://review.openstack.org/218117 | 19:36 |
| rm_work | hey guys: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/222343/ | 19:36 |
| rm_work | ^^ could use a +A | 19:36 |
| rm_work | redrobot: | 19:37 |
| redrobot | rm_work done | 19:37 |
| rm_work | thanks | 19:37 |
| *** lisaclark1 has joined #openstack-barbican | 19:38 | |
| *** lisaclark1 has quit IRC | 19:38 | |
| *** lisaclark1 has joined #openstack-barbican | 19:39 | |
| silos | dave-mccowan: ping | 19:44 |
| *** tkelsey has joined #openstack-barbican | 19:46 | |
| *** lisaclark1 has quit IRC | 19:47 | |
| *** gyee has joined #openstack-barbican | 19:57 | |
| openstackgerrit | Fernando Diaz proposed openstack/castellan: Add name to Barbican Key Manager Secret Creation https://review.openstack.org/220850 | 19:58 |
| *** rm_you| is now known as rm_you | 20:07 | |
| openstackgerrit | Fernando Diaz proposed openstack/barbican: Use testr for running functional tests and documentation https://review.openstack.org/218117 | 20:07 |
| *** rellerreller has quit IRC | 20:09 | |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/barbican: Remove bad clones (new devstack method doesn't need this) https://review.openstack.org/222343 | 20:10 |
| *** kebray has quit IRC | 20:15 | |
| *** kebray has joined #openstack-barbican | 20:16 | |
| *** lisaclark1 has joined #openstack-barbican | 20:17 | |
| *** dave-mccowan has quit IRC | 20:18 | |
| openstackgerrit | Fernando Diaz proposed openstack/barbican: Use testr for running functional tests and documentation https://review.openstack.org/218117 | 20:19 |
| *** tkelsey has quit IRC | 20:34 | |
| *** lisaclark1 has quit IRC | 20:51 | |
| *** tkelsey has joined #openstack-barbican | 21:02 | |
| *** tkelsey has quit IRC | 21:06 | |
| *** kfarr has quit IRC | 21:12 | |
| *** silos has left #openstack-barbican | 21:16 | |
| *** alee is now known as alee_afk | 21:17 | |
| *** gyee has quit IRC | 21:19 | |
| *** edtubill has quit IRC | 21:38 | |
| *** tkelsey has joined #openstack-barbican | 21:41 | |
| *** tkelsey has quit IRC | 21:45 | |
| *** diazjf has left #openstack-barbican | 21:50 | |
| *** dimtruck is now known as zz_dimtruck | 21:57 | |
| *** xaeth is now known as xaeth_afk | 22:01 | |
| *** gyee has joined #openstack-barbican | 22:19 | |
| *** gyee has quit IRC | 22:25 | |
| *** pglass has quit IRC | 22:29 | |
| -openstackstatus- NOTICE: 30 minute warning, Gerrit will be offline from 23:00 to 23:30 UTC while some projects are renamed http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-September/074235.html | 22:31 | |
| *** gyee has joined #openstack-barbican | 22:33 | |
| *** spotz is now known as spotz_zzz | 22:38 | |
| -openstackstatus- NOTICE: Gerrit is offline from 23:00 to 23:30 UTC while some projects are renamed. http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-September/074235.html | 23:00 | |
| *** ChanServ changes topic to "Gerrit is offline from 23:00 to 23:30 UTC while some projects are renamed. http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-September/074235.html" | 23:00 | |
| *** codekobe has quit IRC | 23:04 | |
| *** codekobe has joined #openstack-barbican | 23:06 | |
| *** gyee has quit IRC | 23:16 | |
| *** gyee has joined #openstack-barbican | 23:23 | |
| *** gyee has quit IRC | 23:23 | |
| *** ChanServ changes topic to "OpenStack Barbican Development - next milestone liberty-3 on Sept 1-3" | 23:38 | |
| *** SheenaG has joined #openstack-barbican | 23:41 | |
| *** SheenaG has quit IRC | 23:45 | |
| *** openstackgerrit has quit IRC | 23:46 | |
| *** SheenaG has joined #openstack-barbican | 23:46 | |
| *** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-barbican | 23:46 | |
| *** SheenaG has quit IRC | 23:49 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!