| *** thomasem has quit IRC | 00:21 | |
| *** matsuhashi has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 00:27 | |
| *** ddieterly has quit IRC | 00:28 | |
| *** nosnos has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 00:43 | |
| *** ddieterly has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 00:59 | |
| *** ddieterly has quit IRC | 01:03 | |
| *** pnascimento has quit IRC | 01:23 | |
| *** ddieterly has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 01:29 | |
| *** lecalcot has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 01:52 | |
| lecalcot | Hi, where's the most appropriate forum for a discussion on the roadmap for financial management within Ceilometer (or other component(s))? | 02:19 |
|---|---|---|
| *** Hao has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 02:20 | |
| *** Hao has quit IRC | 02:20 | |
| lecalcot | Have these use cases been successfully provided for to date in Ceilometer or have they yet to be achieved? https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Ceilometer/blueprints/support-for-advance-service-billing-models | 02:23 |
| lecalcot | While Ceilometer provides for *metering* as one category of financial management, does it provide for others (e.g. pricing - - a method to set prices on common objects)? | 02:32 |
| *** lecalcot has quit IRC | 02:33 | |
| *** lecalcot has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 02:35 | |
| *** lecalcot has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 02:36 | |
| *** ddieterly has quit IRC | 02:55 | |
| *** ddieterly has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 02:58 | |
| *** nosnos has quit IRC | 03:34 | |
| *** ddieterly has quit IRC | 03:38 | |
| *** lecalcot has quit IRC | 03:51 | |
| *** lecalcot has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 03:55 | |
| *** lecalcot has quit IRC | 03:55 | |
| *** lecalcot has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 03:56 | |
| *** ddieterly has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 04:21 | |
| *** ddieterly has quit IRC | 04:26 | |
| *** nosnos has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 04:26 | |
| *** ddieterly has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 04:32 | |
| *** ddieterly has quit IRC | 04:37 | |
| *** psharma has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 04:53 | |
| *** ddieterly has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 05:32 | |
| *** ildikov has quit IRC | 05:35 | |
| *** ddieterly has quit IRC | 05:37 | |
| openstackgerrit | OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Imported Translations from Transifex https://review.openstack.org/88506 | 06:02 |
| *** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 06:07 | |
| *** ildikov has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 06:09 | |
| *** _nadya_ has quit IRC | 06:26 | |
| *** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 06:29 | |
| *** _nadya_ has quit IRC | 06:30 | |
| *** ddieterly has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 06:32 | |
| *** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 06:34 | |
| *** ddieterly has quit IRC | 06:37 | |
| *** _nadya_ has quit IRC | 06:39 | |
| *** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 06:41 | |
| *** _nadya_ has quit IRC | 06:42 | |
| openstackgerrit | Ildiko Vancsa proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Clean tox.ini https://review.openstack.org/96781 | 06:50 |
| openstackgerrit | Ildiko Vancsa proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Clean tox.ini https://review.openstack.org/96781 | 06:51 |
| *** Underyx|off is now known as underyx | 07:08 | |
| *** Longgeek has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 07:16 | |
| *** lsmola has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 07:25 | |
| *** shardy has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 07:27 | |
| zqfan | Longgeek: hi, the bug you reported, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ceilometer/+bug/1325399, can you provide more information, it seems you add localhost to ipv6 address which cause that problem, but I cannot reproduce it | 07:29 |
| Longgeek | zqfan: Sorry, just on the line | 07:31 |
| *** ddieterly has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 07:32 | |
| Longgeek | zqfan: I did not use the ipv6 address | 07:34 |
| zqfan | Longgeek: in the bug report, you cat your /etc/hosts file, in ipv6 part, the localhost is translated to ::1, this is not the default setting on ubuntu 12.04 system at least, I think that is intended, and the exception: Address family for hostname not supported, most google result shows that related to ipv6 problem | 07:36 |
| *** ddieterly has quit IRC | 07:37 | |
| zqfan | Longgeek: eh, intended means you have modified that part manually or by some command | 07:38 |
| *** ddieterly has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 07:39 | |
| Longgeek | zqfan: I try | 07:39 |
| zqfan | Longgeek: however, I copied your setting and run the devstack, but cannot reproduce the problem too, so I think we need to dig out the root cause | 07:39 |
| Longgeek | zqfan: That is the question, /etc/hosts enabled ipv6 | 07:41 |
| *** ddieterly has quit IRC | 07:43 | |
| *** r0j4z0 has quit IRC | 07:48 | |
| *** nacim has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 07:59 | |
| *** ildikov has quit IRC | 08:02 | |
| *** admin0 has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 08:03 | |
| *** ildikov has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 08:10 | |
| *** safchain has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 08:20 | |
| -openstackstatus- NOTICE: setuptools upstream has broken the world. it's a known issue. we're hoping that a solution materializes soon | 08:30 | |
| *** ChanServ changes topic to "setuptools upstream has broken the world. it's a known issue. we're hoping that a solution materializes soon" | 08:30 | |
| underyx | hey there | 08:36 |
| underyx | I disabled keystone auth in paste.ini by removing the authtoken filter from the pipeline | 08:36 |
| underyx | and most likely cause of that, now I'm getting 404s on /v2.0/tokens when I try to connect with the ceilometer command | 08:37 |
| underyx | do I even still need to provide auth details when trying to connect? if so, how do I fix the /tokens endpoint? | 08:37 |
| *** aswadr has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 08:49 | |
| *** vrovachev has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 09:08 | |
| *** IvanBerezovskiy has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 09:11 | |
| aswadr | hi, is it possible to delete a created sample using python-ceilometerclient? I could not see a delete v2-api in "SampleManager" | 09:27 |
| aswadr | https://github.com/openstack/python-ceilometerclient/blob/master/ceilometerclient/v2/samples.py#L34 | 09:27 |
| aswadr | Question: Why is delete not part of this API? | 09:27 |
| *** denis_makogon has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 09:33 | |
| *** idegtiarov has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 09:35 | |
| *** denis_makogon has left #openstack-ceilometer | 09:49 | |
| openstackgerrit | Mehdi Abaakouk proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Fix aggregator flush method https://review.openstack.org/97176 | 09:49 |
| openstackgerrit | Mehdi Abaakouk proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Fix aggregator flush method https://review.openstack.org/97176 | 09:50 |
| *** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 09:51 | |
| *** ildikov has quit IRC | 09:54 | |
| *** ildikov_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 09:54 | |
| *** ildikov_ has quit IRC | 09:56 | |
| *** ildikov_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 09:56 | |
| *** Longgeek has quit IRC | 09:57 | |
| *** Longgeek has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 09:58 | |
| *** _nadya_ has quit IRC | 09:59 | |
| *** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 10:00 | |
| *** ildikov_ has quit IRC | 10:03 | |
| *** ildikov has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 10:06 | |
| *** zqfan has quit IRC | 10:16 | |
| *** underyx is now known as Underyx | 10:52 | |
| openstackgerrit | Dina Belova proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Add new 'storage': {'production_ready': True} capability https://review.openstack.org/96752 | 11:14 |
| DinaBelova | ildikov, please check the doc strings in the change ^^^ :) | 11:14 |
| DinaBelova | as I could get the comments wrong... | 11:14 |
| DinaBelova | :) | 11:14 |
| *** Longgeek has quit IRC | 11:18 | |
| *** _nadya_ has quit IRC | 11:25 | |
| *** Ruetobas has quit IRC | 11:35 | |
| *** Longgeek has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 11:37 | |
| *** Ruetobas has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 11:43 | |
| *** eglynn has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 11:44 | |
| *** promulo has quit IRC | 11:47 | |
| *** Ruetobas has quit IRC | 11:48 | |
| *** promulo has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 11:50 | |
| DinaBelova | eglynn, ildikov - do you have any ideas what should we do with the new setuptools, that breaks gate for all openstack? :) | 11:53 |
| *** Ruetobas has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 11:53 | |
| eglynn | DinaBelova: I'm travelling right now (with fairly fairly limited connectivity) | 11:54 |
| eglynn | DinaBelova: ... I'll have a look into it in a few hours once I get home | 11:55 |
| eglynn | fairly fairly :) ... my typing hasn't improved | 11:55 |
| DinaBelova | eglynn, ok, cool - I'll try to understand how we might fix it | 11:55 |
| eglynn | DinaBelova: thanks! | 11:56 |
| DinaBelova | new setuptools version breaks python 2.x with pbr | 11:56 |
| DinaBelova | as all openstack uses it.... | 11:56 |
| DinaBelova | we have issue here))) | 11:56 |
| eglynn | DinaBelova: ... is the breakage accross the board? | 11:56 |
| eglynn | DinaBelova: ... i.e. *all* projects impacted? | 11:56 |
| DinaBelova | eglynn - I found bug for the tempest | 11:56 |
| DinaBelova | and one keystoneclient folk and I commented it | 11:57 |
| DinaBelova | will try to mark it - affects project | 11:57 |
| eglynn | DinaBelova: ... would a version cap for setuptools in the global requirements.txt make sense? | 11:57 |
| DinaBelova | no - as it's not set in the requirements)))) | 11:57 |
| eglynn | DinaBelova: ... yeap, just noticed that | 11:57 |
| *** pnascimento has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 11:58 | |
| DinaBelova | eglynn - I've marked ceilometer in the bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ceilometer/+bug/1325514 | 12:00 |
| eglynn | DinaBelova: thanks! | 12:00 |
| eglynn | DinaBelova: ... worth raising it on #openstack-dev or the ML also? | 12:01 |
| eglynn | DinaBelova: (to draw attention to the cross-project aspect) | 12:01 |
| DinaBelova | I see discussion in the infra channel | 12:02 |
| DinaBelova | will check the ML now | 12:02 |
| eglynn | DinaBelova: cool | 12:03 |
| DinaBelova | now, see no ML thread | 12:03 |
| DinaBelova | will start it now | 12:03 |
| *** promulo has quit IRC | 12:04 | |
| DinaBelova | eglynn, done - "New setuptools release seems to break some of the OS projects" is the ML topic | 12:07 |
| eglynn | DinaBelova: thank you! ... reading | 12:07 |
| *** erecio has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 12:10 | |
| *** cdent has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 12:15 | |
| cdent | eglynn: no reviewing on holiday! | 12:18 |
| eglynn | cdent ... :) | 12:19 |
| eglynn | cdent: ... good climb on Saturday? | 12:19 |
| cdent | yeah, was a really good day | 12:19 |
| eglynn | cool | 12:20 |
| * eglynn is still chuckling at "bros with their shirts off" :) | 12:20 | |
| cdent | No shirt were taken off, no one was injured, everyone climbed well, so a good day. | 12:21 |
| cdent | what's up with $topic? | 12:22 |
| *** matsuhashi has quit IRC | 12:22 | |
| *** ildikov_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 12:22 | |
| *** ildikov has quit IRC | 12:23 | |
| *** eglynn has quit IRC | 12:25 | |
| ildikov_ | DinaBelova: as I saw on infra, they are aware of that problem, also that it is a cross-project blocking issue, so if you can fix it, everyone will be greatful to you ;) | 12:27 |
| *** jdob has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 12:27 | |
| DinaBelova | no, it looks I can't - there is no way to block some of the setuptools issue in the gate - I've checked this | 12:27 |
| *** gordc has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 12:27 | |
| DinaBelova | so the only thing we can do is to look on the https://bitbucket.org/pypa/setuptools/issue/213/regression-setuptools-37-installation and wait till it'll be fixed | 12:28 |
| *** Alexei_987 has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 12:31 | |
| ildikov_ | DinaBelova: I haven't checked this actual issue, I did not have the chance today, but this is how it works, no worries, it will not stay like this :) | 12:32 |
| *** lecalcot_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 12:33 | |
| *** lecalcot has quit IRC | 12:33 | |
| DinaBelova | ildikov_, ok)) Simply that makes me a little bit crazy - setuptools folks are sleeping now, so we'll be blocked until either they'll fix it or setuptools3.7 will be kicked off from the gate mirror at least - even if so, there are no guarantees | 12:34 |
| cdent | Seems like setuptools is one of those things that ought to be version pinned in the gate. | 12:34 |
| ildikov_ | DinaBelova: a few weeks ago that gate was failing for 4 days for Ceilometer, it happens, do not miss a good night sleep because of it | 12:35 |
| *** eglynn has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 12:36 | |
| ildikov_ | DinaBelova: we do not have release dates for this week, so no huge pressure, so it's unfortunate, but we cannot do anything but wait | 12:36 |
| DinaBelova | ildikov_, hehe, that's true.... | 12:37 |
| ildikov_ | eglynn: what have you told me about working during vacation? it results in kicking the person out from IRC right? ;) | 12:37 |
| *** eglynn is now known as sockie-the-puppe | 12:38 | |
| DinaBelova | :D | 12:38 |
| sockie-the-puppe | ildikov_: I have no idea who that eglynn is, of whom you speak ;) | 12:38 |
| DinaBelova | sockie-the-puppe, nice) | 12:39 |
| sockie-the-puppe | hey, someone stole my 't' ;) | 12:39 |
| cdent | the t is on holiday | 12:39 |
| ildikov_ | sockie-the-puppe: at least you could figure out a better sock puppet name ;) | 12:39 |
| ildikov_ | sockie-the-puppe: your name is too long for the poor IRC ;) | 12:39 |
| *** psharma has quit IRC | 12:44 | |
| DinaBelova | ildikov_, sockie-the-puppe - the newest setuptools has been removed from the gate mirror | 12:47 |
| DinaBelova | so it'll work on the gate | 12:47 |
| DinaBelova | locally we'll need to fix it manually | 12:47 |
| sockie-the-puppe | DinaBelova: nice work, thank you! | 12:47 |
| DinaBelova | sockie-the-puppe, well, I have some influence on the infra folks))) | 12:47 |
| sockie-the-puppe | DinaBelova: LOL :) | 12:47 |
| ildikov_ | DinaBelova: :) | 12:48 |
| cdent | biab | 12:48 |
| *** cdent has quit IRC | 12:48 | |
| *** Ahsan has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 12:48 | |
| openstackgerrit | Mehdi Abaakouk proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Fix aggregator flush method https://review.openstack.org/97176 | 12:49 |
| sockie-the-puppe | DinaBelova: ... my granny used to say: "no string should be left unpulled" ;) | 12:50 |
| DinaBelova | sockie-the-puppe, :D | 12:51 |
| Ahsan | Hi All, I wanted to ask if there is any way of deleting the created SAMPLES/METERS in ceilometer? In the v2 api, delete is supported only for ALARMS. | 12:51 |
| sockie-the-puppe | Ahsan: that would go against the spirit of metering | 12:52 |
| sockie-the-puppe | Ahsan: there is a TTL feature though | 12:52 |
| sockie-the-puppe | Ahsan: ... as in, *expire* old data | 12:52 |
| DinaBelova | Ahsan - well, we are storing meters as this is the info we should have to be presented | 12:52 |
| DinaBelova | sockie-the-puppe, ++\ | 12:52 |
| *** sockie-the-puppe is now known as eglynn | 12:53 | |
| eglynn | laptop battery about to die, laters folks ... | 12:53 |
| DinaBelova | eglynn, see u! | 12:54 |
| *** eglynn has quit IRC | 12:57 | |
| aswadr | DinaBelova: meters can be created through samples.create but cant be deleted | 12:57 |
| Ahsan | So, there is no way to delete a created SAMPLE ourselves? and how much time does it take for a sample to expire? | 12:57 |
| ildikov_ | it can be set in the config file | 12:58 |
| ildikov_ | there is a ttl value, so the expiration of samples can be configured | 12:58 |
| DinaBelova | here it is in the icehouse conf file - https://github.com/openstack/ceilometer/blob/stable/icehouse/etc/ceilometer/ceilometer.conf.sample#L699 | 12:59 |
| ildikov_ | there isn't any API support for deleting samples | 13:00 |
| Ahsan | Yeah, thanks for your help sockie-the-puppe, ildikov_ and DinaBelova :) | 13:02 |
| DinaBelova | Ahsan, you're welcome :) | 13:03 |
| *** rbowen has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 13:04 | |
| ildikov_ | Ahsan: np :) | 13:07 |
| *** ddieterly has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 13:07 | |
| *** julim has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 13:08 | |
| *** julim has quit IRC | 13:09 | |
| *** Infitialis has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 13:17 | |
| *** nosnos has quit IRC | 13:18 | |
| *** ddieterly has quit IRC | 13:24 | |
| *** joesavak has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 13:24 | |
| *** thomasem has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 13:25 | |
| *** gordc has quit IRC | 13:32 | |
| *** gordc has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 13:35 | |
| openstackgerrit | Ilya Tyaptin proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Improve performance of api requests with hbase scan https://review.openstack.org/93576 | 13:43 |
| *** cmart has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 13:47 | |
| *** cdent has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 13:50 | |
| DinaBelova | ildikov_, please take a look on the https://review.openstack.org/#/c/96752/ - I want Vadim so work on the tempest tests asap))) | 13:52 |
| pnascimento | I have patched my Ceilometer to get a new agent, but I don't see any action on the database :S on /opt/stack/data/log isn't any log file for agents, where agents log supposed to be? | 13:58 |
| *** promulo has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 13:58 | |
| pnascimento | and on the screen-ceilometer-collector.log appeared some error on the AMPQ lib: /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/amqp/channel.py:616: VDeprecationWarning: The auto_delete flag for exchanges has been deprecated and will be removed from py-amqp v1.5.0. warn(VDeprecationWarning(EXCHANGE_AUTODELETE_DEPRECATED)) | 13:59 |
| pnascimento | could be because of this? | 13:59 |
| DinaBelova | well, this depends on how are you running this agent.. usually when you're using devstack you see agents logs in the appropriate screen tab - so basically you probably might see the logs where you started this agent | 14:00 |
| DinaBelova | probably I might not see the actual problem here, so please forgive me) | 14:00 |
| *** Ahsan has quit IRC | 14:04 | |
| pnascimento | DinaBelova: maybe expressed me on the wrong way, I have two problems, and I don't know if they are related... the first one, its the "inactivity" of the agent... and the second one its that "warning" on the ceilometer-collector.log... I was wondering if they are related and suggested that... | 14:04 |
| *** jaypipes has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 14:05 | |
| DinaBelova | pnascimento, as I understand you have implemented some new agent - and try to test it | 14:07 |
| DinaBelova | pnascimento - is that true? | 14:07 |
| *** julim has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 14:07 | |
| DinaBelova | deprecation warnings possibly are not the importtant thing here | 14:07 |
| DinaBelova | as there are looots of them really | 14:07 |
| DinaBelova | in the ceilo logs I mean | 14:07 |
| DinaBelova | if you have created new agent code - how are you starting it? | 14:08 |
| DinaBelova | because to have it started you need to do that manually (if you're not patching the devstack itself) | 14:08 |
| pnascimento | DinaBelova: you are right! :) new agent => created patch => unstack.sh => clean.sh => git am new.patch => stack.sh | 14:08 |
| pnascimento | DinaBelova: ... and now I don't see nothing on the database | 14:09 |
| pnascimento | DinaBelova: ... but I passed to the UTs | 14:09 |
| DinaBelova | are you changing the devstack code too? or only the ceilometer one? | 14:09 |
| *** r0j4z0 has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 14:09 | |
| DinaBelova | as devstack does not know about this new service to be run | 14:09 |
| DinaBelova | all services and screens should be set in the devstack code itself | 14:10 |
| DinaBelova | if you haven't done it, your service is not simply starting | 14:10 |
| DinaBelova | you need to do that manually on the devstack host | 14:10 |
| pnascimento | DinaBelova: just ceilometer, and didn't "changed" the source I have just append some Python files for my agent | 14:11 |
| DinaBelova | by typing in the new screen/tmux tab, for instance "<new-ceilo-agent> --config-file <config-file>"" | 14:11 |
| DinaBelova | you might see how it's done in the ceilo devstack tabs, for instance | 14:12 |
| *** ddieterly has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 14:12 | |
| DinaBelova | basically if ceilometer code is installed (it should be as you're using the devstack) you'll have simply to run needed endpoint with the needed config-file | 14:13 |
| *** ChanServ changes topic to "OpenStack Telemetry (Ceilometer) | https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Ceilometer" | 14:14 | |
| -openstackstatus- NOTICE: setuptools issue was fixed in upstream in 3.7.1 and 4.0.1, please, recheck on bug 1325514 | 14:14 | |
| pnascimento | I can interact through "ceilometer-send-sample" :) but I can't see any "movement" of my agent | 14:15 |
| DinaBelova | how are you running it? | 14:15 |
| pnascimento | in which log agents write statements? | 14:15 |
| pnascimento | devstack, ceilometer? or the CLI command? | 14:16 |
| DinaBelova | your agent) | 14:16 |
| DinaBelova | it's the separated service, you need to run it separately | 14:16 |
| *** mgagne has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 14:17 | |
| ildikov_ | DinaBelova: done | 14:18 |
| DinaBelova | ildikov_, thanks! | 14:18 |
| *** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 14:19 | |
| ildikov_ | DinaBelova: np, sorry for the delay, but I'm just a slave of my company ;) | 14:19 |
| DinaBelova | ildikov_, :D | 14:19 |
| *** ddieterl_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 14:23 | |
| *** Longgeek has quit IRC | 14:24 | |
| *** Longgeek has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 14:25 | |
| pnascimento | DinaBelova: my agent? :S how so? I have created a manager.py, created my pollster, added the pollster to setup.cfg, created a source on pipeline.yaml, created a sink on pipeline.yaml then patched it and applied on ceilometer | 14:25 |
| *** Longgeek has quit IRC | 14:25 | |
| *** Longgeek has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 14:25 | |
| *** Longgeek has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 14:25 | |
| ildikov_ | dhellmann: hi | 14:26 |
| pnascimento | DinaBelova: ... this is how Eoghan teach me to do it... I'm doing it wrong? | 14:26 |
| ildikov_ | dhellmann: could you ping me, when you have a few minutes? | 14:26 |
| *** ddieterly has quit IRC | 14:26 | |
| DinaBelova | pnascimento, you did the right steps))) but the thing is that you need to *run* this code | 14:30 |
| DinaBelova | as it's done by devstack | 14:30 |
| pnascimento | hm, but for testing purposes or "production scenario" (not really production because it's a devstack instance, but let's call it this way) ? | 14:32 |
| pnascimento | ... and I run the pollster, the manager? a "process" or a "service" ? | 14:33 |
| *** admin0 has quit IRC | 14:39 | |
| dhellmann | ildikov_: hi | 14:40 |
| DinaBelova | pnascimento, the service - like it's run for other services in the devstack screen | 14:41 |
| DinaBelova | each screen tab contains the service running | 14:41 |
| DinaBelova | and all logs are there :) | 14:41 |
| openstackgerrit | Chris Dent proposed a change to openstack/python-ceilometerclient: Refactor split_by_op and split_by_datatype https://review.openstack.org/96514 | 14:41 |
| *** parkerr_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 14:42 | |
| pnascimento | DinaBelova: I understand that, but I don't know, If I asking something to noob, but how to I configure or start a "service" with a dedicated screen for my agent? | 14:42 |
| DinaBelova | wel,, you have two variants - patch the devstack code itself | 14:43 |
| DinaBelova | or to start this (new) service manually | 14:43 |
| DinaBelova | like "ceilometer-api --config-file /etc/ceiloemeter/ceilometer.conf" | 14:43 |
| DinaBelova | that's the thing that's running in the devstack | 14:44 |
| openstackgerrit | Christian Martinez proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Adding alarm list filtering by state and meter https://review.openstack.org/96582 | 14:46 |
| pnascimento | DinaBelova: but I have already patched the devstack | 14:49 |
| pnascimento | DinaBelova: ...not really the devstack it's more likely the ceilometer on the /opt/stack created by devstack | 14:49 |
| cdent | EmilienM: I'm trying to get caught up on your ceilometer+grenade changes. Are there more patchsets besides 94468 and 94547? For exploring making changes to javelin I should depend on those, yes? | 14:50 |
| DinaBelova | pnascimento, well you have installed the ceilometer code to your testing lab | 14:51 |
| DinaBelova | pnascimento but to run the agent you need to type the appropriate command | 14:51 |
| *** robsparker has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 14:51 | |
| *** parkerr_ has left #openstack-ceilometer | 14:52 | |
| pnascimento | DinaBelova: that seems to make sense for me, but so, why we need to add the pollsters do setup.cfg? I thought that setup.cfg with pipeline.yaml leverages Ceilometer with a "dynamic behaviour" | 14:59 |
| pnascimento | DinaBelova: ... but I will look into the Ceilometer "processes" and see where this command are being defined and invoked! ;) | 14:59 |
| pnascimento | DinaBelova: ... you helped me to understand something that are not covered by documentation! thank you :) | 15:00 |
| openstackgerrit | gordon chung proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer-specs: Logging Guidelines for Ceilometer https://review.openstack.org/97261 | 15:00 |
| DinaBelova | pnascimento, :0 | 15:00 |
| DinaBelova | :) | 15:00 |
| DinaBelova | pnascimento, please take a look on the https://github.com/openstack-dev/devstack/blob/master/lib/ceilometer#L241 | 15:01 |
| DinaBelova | https://github.com/openstack-dev/devstack/blob/master/lib/ceilometer#L248 for nstance | 15:01 |
| DinaBelova | here you see how different services are started | 15:01 |
| DinaBelova | ceilometer-acentral, ceilometer-anotification, ceilometer-collector and ceilometer-api | 15:01 |
| DinaBelova | without this your devstack won't start your agent for sure | 15:02 |
| DinaBelova | or, as said - you may do that manually | 15:02 |
| ildikov_ | dhellmann: sorry, I'm back, are you still available? | 15:06 |
| DinaBelova | ildikov_, you here? | 15:15 |
| ildikov_ | DinaBelova: yes | 15:15 |
| DinaBelova | May you please take a look on the following spec - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/96417/ - as it's supposed to be solved in j1 | 15:15 |
| DinaBelova | idegtiarov has fixed lots of comments :) | 15:15 |
| DinaBelova | so if you're ok with it - probably we may merge it :) and update the BP itself | 15:16 |
| DinaBelova | if needed | 15:16 |
| *** Infitialis has quit IRC | 15:16 | |
| ildikov_ | I will add it to the today's list | 15:16 |
| DinaBelova | ildikov_, thanks! | 15:16 |
| ildikov_ | DinaBelova: it's better after, I'm a bit too busy today and there are still some managers at the office, who are hungry to my blood ;) | 15:17 |
| DinaBelova | ildikov_, well, I feel really sorry you need to go through this managers hell :( | 15:18 |
| DinaBelova | that's time-eating activity | 15:18 |
| DinaBelova | so please take a look when you can to :) | 15:19 |
| ildikov_ | DinaBelova: it's usually not that bad, and anyway, I chose to do this, next time I will be smarter :) | 15:19 |
| ildikov_ | DinaBelova: sure, I will try my best | 15:19 |
| dhellmann | ildikov_: I'm back | 15:19 |
| DinaBelova | ildikov_, what did you promise them? :D | 15:19 |
| DinaBelova | to make the world better? :) | 15:19 |
| ildikov_ | DinaBelova: I'm just a team lead, but there are too many meetings even for this role here :) | 15:20 |
| ildikov_ | dhellmann: hi | 15:20 |
| *** idegtiarov has quit IRC | 15:20 | |
| DinaBelova | ildikov_, well, that's something we need to be patient about :) | 15:20 |
| DinaBelova | good luck! | 15:20 |
| pnascimento | DinaBelova: thank you, I will try it that way :) | 15:20 |
| DinaBelova | pnascimento, ok! | 15:21 |
| ildikov_ | dhellmann: if you have a few minutes, I would like to ask some sphinx, doc related questions regarding to this patch: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/96258/ | 15:21 |
| ildikov_ | dhellmann: I tried to do some cleaning to fix all the warnings in the sphinx build | 15:21 |
| dhellmann | ildikov_: sure | 15:22 |
| ildikov_ | dhellmann: most of my questions are in this file: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/96258/10/doc/source/index.rst | 15:22 |
| ildikov_ | dhellmann: there was a warning about the autoindex.rst, that it is not included in any toctree | 15:23 |
| dhellmann | do we generate a useful autoindex? | 15:23 |
| ildikov_ | dhellmann: currently it is empty | 15:23 |
| ildikov_ | dhellmann: so I wanted to ask that do we need it? | 15:24 |
| ildikov_ | dhellmann: if yes, than what should I do to fix the content of it? | 15:24 |
| ildikov_ | dhellmann: s/than/then/ | 15:24 |
| *** admin0 has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 15:24 | |
| *** robbybb has quit IRC | 15:24 | |
| dhellmann | that file is generated as part of the documentation build | 15:25 |
| dhellmann | I wonder why it is empty | 15:25 |
| *** lecalcot_ has quit IRC | 15:25 | |
| ildikov_ | dhellmann: it's almost empty | 15:26 |
| ildikov_ | dhellmann: I meant that it does not contain any useful information | 15:26 |
| ildikov_ | dhellmann: http://docs-draft.openstack.org/58/96258/10/check/gate-ceilometer-docs/a4d9bd5/doc/build/html/ | 15:26 |
| ildikov_ | dhellmann: http://docs-draft.openstack.org/58/96258/10/check/gate-ceilometer-docs/a4d9bd5/doc/build/html/sourcecode/autoindex.html#ceilometer | 15:27 |
| ildikov_ | dhellmann: the former is that how it is included in the ToC, the latter is the content of the file that is generated currently | 15:27 |
| dhellmann | ildikov_: right, I am trying to understand why the generated file comes out empty. It should contain references to parts of our source tree to document the classes. | 15:27 |
| openstackgerrit | Doug Hellmann proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Fix list of modules not included in auto-gen docs. https://review.openstack.org/97268 | 15:30 |
| DinaBelova | gordc, o/ | 15:30 |
| dhellmann | ildikov_: ^^ | 15:30 |
| *** fabiog has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 15:30 | |
| DinaBelova | gordc, I've commented the https://bugs.launchpad.net/ceilometer/+bug/1321826 - what do you think about my suggestion? | 15:30 |
| DinaBelova | gordc, as I have no idea how does this error sometimes appear... | 15:30 |
| ildikov_ | dhellmann: hmm :) | 15:31 |
| dhellmann | ildikov_: with my follow-up patch to your changes, it should be OK to keep autoindex in the toctree | 15:31 |
| DinaBelova | dhellmann, hehe, I love python tuples :D | 15:32 |
| ildikov_ | dhellmann: so it was empty only because of that comma? | 15:32 |
| ildikov_ | dhellmann: I do not know how much time I would have needed to figure this out :) | 15:32 |
| ildikov_ | dhellmann: thanks :) | 15:32 |
| dhellmann | ildikov_: yes, because of the way that variable is used the loop was checking for modules that started with "c" -- which is all of our modules | 15:32 |
| ildikov_ | dhellmann: a-ha, I see | 15:33 |
| DinaBelova | ildikov_, that's the pythonic magic :) (a)==a, (a,) is the tuple :) | 15:33 |
| dhellmann | ildikov_: I looked at the build output and saw that it was explicitly skipping everything, and then I looked at conf.py to see how that worked, and then I went to look at the variable and noticed that it was a string but was being used as a sequence | 15:33 |
| ildikov_ | DinaBelova: yeap, I know, just hard to realize in an unknown module... :S | 15:33 |
| DinaBelova | ildikov_, yeah, sorry to point this, but I *love* this python magic :) | 15:34 |
| ildikov_ | DinaBelova: :) | 15:34 |
| DinaBelova | that's why I'm quite excited to see it one more time :) | 15:34 |
| DinaBelova | in action :) | 15:34 |
| ildikov_ | dhellmann: the other question in that file is the todo | 15:34 |
| ildikov_ | dhellmann: the list that I removed there, it was intended to be the To Do list? | 15:35 |
| dhellmann | ildikov_: that's the idea, but I don't know if we use that feature very much now that we have launchpad bugs | 15:35 |
| dhellmann | ildikov_: did you find any todo entries in the other .rst files? | 15:36 |
| dhellmann | ildikov_: if not, you could remove sphinx.ext.todo from the list of extensions in conf.py | 15:36 |
| ildikov_ | dhellmann: I removed that section there because in the generated doc the To Do list was empty | 15:36 |
| ildikov_ | dhellmann: I do not remember any To Do items in other files, but I will double check before removing that extension, I just wanted to ask before doing that radical step | 15:37 |
| dhellmann | ildikov_: ok, I think it's safe if you don't find todos | 15:38 |
| dhellmann | and if you do find any, we should treat those as bugs and remove them | 15:38 |
| ildikov_ | dhellmann: maybe I register a bug if I find any useful todo anywhere in the doc | 15:38 |
| ildikov_ | dhellmann: cool, then we agree here :) | 15:38 |
| dhellmann | an easy way to check is to remove the extension from the conf and run the build, since sphinx won't understand the todo directive without the extension installed | 15:38 |
| ildikov_ | dhellmann: sure, thanks for the hint | 15:39 |
| ildikov_ | dhellmann: one additional thing that I removed is the internal API reference | 15:39 |
| dhellmann | ildikov_: "internal API reference"? | 15:40 |
| ildikov_ | dhellmann: http://docs.openstack.org/developer/ceilometer/api/index.html | 15:40 |
| dhellmann | ah, I think that's an old form of what is now going into sourcecode/autoindex.py | 15:41 |
| ildikov_ | dhellmann: ah, ok, then it will be covered by your patch, when the autoindex is fixed | 15:41 |
| dhellmann | right | 15:42 |
| DinaBelova | gordc, ^^ about the bug somewhere :) | 15:42 |
| ildikov_ | dhellmann: great, then my doc patch is covered | 15:43 |
| ildikov_ | dhellmann: I also removed the unnecessary parts from tox.ini: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/96781/ | 15:44 |
| ildikov_ | dhellmann: it seems ok according to the gate | 15:44 |
| ildikov_ | dhellmann: do I need anything else to check or if the gate works fine then it should be ok? | 15:45 |
| dhellmann | ildikov_: that change looks OK | 15:46 |
| ildikov_ | dhellmann: great | 15:46 |
| dhellmann | ildikov_: I asked for a recheck on 96781 | 15:46 |
| ildikov_ | dhellmann: I do not have any questions left, so thanks for your time | 15:47 |
| ildikov_ | dhellmann: thanks, it failed in the setuptools flood | 15:47 |
| dhellmann | ildikov_: I'm glad I could help | 15:49 |
| ildikov_ | dhellmann: you saved the lonely doc fighter :) | 15:52 |
| *** _cjones_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 15:55 | |
| *** vrovachev has quit IRC | 16:01 | |
| *** Ruetobas has quit IRC | 16:01 | |
| *** Ruetobas has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 16:03 | |
| *** pnascimento has quit IRC | 16:05 | |
| *** IvanBerezovskiy has left #openstack-ceilometer | 16:05 | |
| *** fnaval has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 16:05 | |
| *** Ruetobas has quit IRC | 16:08 | |
| openstackgerrit | Ildiko Vancsa proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Fix doc gate job false success https://review.openstack.org/96258 | 16:13 |
| *** Ruetobas has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 16:14 | |
| *** packet has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 16:14 | |
| *** pnascimento has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 16:17 | |
| *** julim has quit IRC | 16:28 | |
| *** cmart has quit IRC | 16:31 | |
| gordc | DinaBelova: sorry. was not paying attention to my computer. | 16:33 |
| DinaBelova | gordc, np :) | 16:33 |
| gordc | DinaBelova: i'll take a look at bug and comment there. | 16:33 |
| DinaBelova | gordc, thanks! | 16:34 |
| *** _nadya_ has quit IRC | 16:34 | |
| *** zqfan has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 16:36 | |
| *** shakamunyi has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 16:37 | |
| *** aviau has quit IRC | 16:39 | |
| *** admin0 has quit IRC | 16:45 | |
| *** Underyx is now known as Underyx|off | 16:45 | |
| *** rwsu has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 16:46 | |
| pnascimento | DinaBelova: I have identified that the services on are executed by this type of CLI clients: https://github.com/openstack-dev/devstack/blob/master/lib/ceilometer#L248 | 16:49 |
| pnascimento | DinaBelova: ... then, I analysed the file: cat /usr/local/bin/ceilometer-agent-compute | 16:50 |
| DinaBelova | pnascimento, yep - as I linked it before :) you may add you command there or run it manually on your env | 16:50 |
| pnascimento | DinaBelova: but I need to create my CLI client, don't I ? | 16:51 |
| *** aviau has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 16:51 | |
| DinaBelova | no, you need to start the server service you've added | 16:52 |
| DinaBelova | your agent | 16:52 |
| DinaBelova | pnascimento, here are all console scripts you might run ib the ceilo | 16:53 |
| DinaBelova | https://github.com/openstack/ceilometer/blob/master/setup.cfg#L190 | 16:53 |
| DinaBelova | and they are used in the devstack to run the services | 16:53 |
| DinaBelova | so if you added this entry point and console script you simply need to type this command | 16:53 |
| pnascimento | DinaBelova: I think I understood now, I must create my CLI class on my agent and then "register it" on the steep.cfg | 16:54 |
| pnascimento | ok will try it | 16:54 |
| DinaBelova | pnascimento, well, not the class, but the funtion really | 16:55 |
| DinaBelova | like this one https://github.com/openstack/ceilometer/blob/master/ceilometer/cli.py#L75 | 16:55 |
| DinaBelova | that starts needed service | 16:55 |
| *** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 16:56 | |
| *** julim has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 17:03 | |
| *** r0j4z0 has quit IRC | 17:09 | |
| *** _nadya_ has quit IRC | 17:12 | |
| openstackgerrit | Chris Dent proposed a change to openstack/python-ceilometerclient: Refactor split_by_op and split_by_datatype https://review.openstack.org/96514 | 17:22 |
| *** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 17:32 | |
| *** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 17:43 | |
| *** _nadya_ has quit IRC | 17:52 | |
| *** nati_ueno has quit IRC | 17:55 | |
| *** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 17:55 | |
| *** pnascimento has quit IRC | 17:56 | |
| *** aswadr has left #openstack-ceilometer | 17:59 | |
| *** nati_ueno has quit IRC | 18:00 | |
| *** fabiog has quit IRC | 18:04 | |
| *** pnascimento has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 18:05 | |
| *** julim has quit IRC | 18:06 | |
| *** zul has quit IRC | 18:08 | |
| *** julim has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 18:09 | |
| *** zqfan has quit IRC | 18:11 | |
| *** zul has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 18:13 | |
| *** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 18:14 | |
| *** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 18:19 | |
| *** _nadya_ has quit IRC | 18:25 | |
| *** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 18:25 | |
| *** cdent_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 18:25 | |
| *** cdent has quit IRC | 18:25 | |
| *** cdent_ is now known as cdent | 18:25 | |
| *** _nadya_ has quit IRC | 18:30 | |
| *** pnascimento has quit IRC | 18:30 | |
| *** ildikov_ is now known as ildikov_afk | 18:35 | |
| *** openstackstatus has quit IRC | 18:50 | |
| *** openstackstatus has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 18:51 | |
| *** ChanServ sets mode: +v openstackstatus | 18:51 | |
| *** cdent_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 18:54 | |
| *** cdent has quit IRC | 18:54 | |
| *** cdent_ is now known as cdent | 18:54 | |
| *** nati_uen_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 18:58 | |
| *** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 18:58 | |
| *** nati_uen_ has quit IRC | 18:59 | |
| openstackgerrit | OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/96819 | 18:59 |
| *** nati_uen_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 18:59 | |
| *** nati_ueno has quit IRC | 19:02 | |
| *** r0j4z0 has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 19:08 | |
| *** cdent has quit IRC | 19:11 | |
| *** _nadya_ has quit IRC | 19:21 | |
| *** fnaval has quit IRC | 19:22 | |
| *** fnaval has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 19:22 | |
| *** nati_uen_ has quit IRC | 19:25 | |
| *** lcostantino has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 19:26 | |
| *** fnaval has quit IRC | 19:26 | |
| *** nati_uen_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 19:27 | |
| dmsimard | I can't seem to get ceilometer-collector to listen on the udp port for use with the udp publisher. I don't see any errors in the logs and I see lines printed about the udp configuration parameters. Any idea ? | 19:34 |
| *** fnaval has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 19:35 | |
| *** r0j4z0 has quit IRC | 19:38 | |
| *** jmckind has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 19:40 | |
| *** r0j4z0 has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 19:47 | |
| *** nati_uen_ has quit IRC | 19:51 | |
| *** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 19:51 | |
| *** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 19:52 | |
| *** nati_ueno has quit IRC | 19:56 | |
| *** openstackgerrit has quit IRC | 19:58 | |
| *** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 20:06 | |
| DinaBelova | eglynn, news about tempest testing | 20:07 |
| DinaBelova | it looks like tempest folks want to make me crazy :) | 20:08 |
| DinaBelova | eglynn, vrovachev, please take a look - http://paste.openstack.org/show/WwU1KhMgOdz5CoJPjdz7/ | 20:09 |
| *** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 20:10 | |
| *** ddieterl_ has quit IRC | 20:19 | |
| *** ddieterly has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 20:20 | |
| r0j4z0 | hi | 20:31 |
| r0j4z0 | ceilometer-expirer is supposed to clean the events data? | 20:31 |
| gordc | r0j4z0: it doesn't currently. | 20:31 |
| r0j4z0 | then i can delete all the data on event/trait tables? | 20:32 |
| gordc | r0j4z0: are you asking how to delete it or can you delete it? | 20:32 |
| r0j4z0 | im asking if i can delete the event data from that tables without breaking anything | 20:33 |
| r0j4z0 | sorry, my english is not so good... | 20:33 |
| gordc | you'd need to do it manually...or create a bug and have someone offer a patch. :) | 20:33 |
| *** julim has quit IRC | 20:34 | |
| r0j4z0 | ok, then i will delete all records on event/event_type/trait/trait_type tables | 20:35 |
| gordc | you can delete it manually sure... as long as you keep key constraints you should be ok... don't know if breaks any auditing use cases for you though. | 20:35 |
| gordc | r0j4z0: cool cool | 20:35 |
| r0j4z0 | ok thankyou gordc | 20:36 |
| r0j4z0 | im trying to imagine how to use the events to get a external system notified | 20:36 |
| r0j4z0 | when something happens on the stack | 20:36 |
| *** Longgeek has quit IRC | 20:37 | |
| r0j4z0 | gordc you know if i can specify a field on event_definitions.yaml that points to a subchild of the payload? | 20:49 |
| r0j4z0 | ipv4: | 20:49 |
| r0j4z0 | fields: payload.fixed_ips.address | 20:49 |
| gordc | r0j4z0: if i remember correctly, it flattens the payload so you should be able to work with any attribute regardless of where it is in payload | 20:52 |
| gordc | the docs should have some examples. | 20:52 |
| r0j4z0 | i searched but all the docs reference only to the first level | 20:53 |
| r0j4z0 | but thanl you i keep searching | 20:53 |
| r0j4z0 | thank* | 20:53 |
| gordc | see os_architecture trait in example: http://docs.openstack.org/developer/ceilometer/events.html | 20:58 |
| *** jdob has quit IRC | 21:03 | |
| dmsimard | I posted on the mailing list about my ceilometer-collector problem if any of you guys want to have a look: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack/2014-June/007556.html | 21:03 |
| r0j4z0 | gordc i saw it but i dont get that information on the events, regarding image_meta i onlye get this: | 21:05 |
| r0j4z0 | "image_meta":{ | 21:05 |
| r0j4z0 | "min_disk":"20", | 21:05 |
| r0j4z0 | "container_format":"bare", | 21:05 |
| r0j4z0 | "min_ram":"0", | 21:05 |
| r0j4z0 | "disk_format":"qcow2", | 21:05 |
| r0j4z0 | "base_image_ref":"e18eb063-9686-4452-999b-75dfe38a087b" | 21:05 |
| r0j4z0 | }, | 21:05 |
| r0j4z0 | then the trait are not created | 21:05 |
| r0j4z0 | if i try to create a new trait for example: | 21:06 |
| r0j4z0 | looool: | 21:06 |
| r0j4z0 | fields: payload.image_meta.min_disk | 21:06 |
| r0j4z0 | i cant get the data, but if call to the "first level" of the payload all works fine | 21:06 |
| *** thomasem has quit IRC | 21:06 | |
| *** jmckind has quit IRC | 21:07 | |
| *** Longgeek has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 21:08 | |
| *** rbowen has quit IRC | 21:09 | |
| r0j4z0 | oj, forget all i said, fields: payload.image_meta.min_disk works fine | 21:09 |
| *** Longgeek has quit IRC | 21:12 | |
| *** admin0 has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 21:17 | |
| r0j4z0 | gordc the problem is the field i want to call are inside of an array and i dont know how to call it | 21:20 |
| r0j4z0 | i will take a look to JSONPath | 21:20 |
| r0j4z0 | dmsimard netstat -putan shows udp 0 0 0.0.0.0:4952 0.0.0.0:* 799/python | 21:26 |
| r0j4z0 | ? | 21:26 |
| *** lcostantino has quit IRC | 21:30 | |
| *** promulo has quit IRC | 21:31 | |
| dmsimard | r0j4z0: Nope, nothing on 4952 on my end with netstat. I use "lsof -Pi" which more or less provides the same output and nothing there either. | 21:32 |
| r0j4z0 | on my devstack port 4952 UDP is opened by the collector process | 21:32 |
| dmsimard | May I ask what version or ceilometer ? | 21:32 |
| dmsimard | of* | 21:32 |
| r0j4z0 | how i can view it? | 21:33 |
| r0j4z0 | im on icehouse | 21:33 |
| r0j4z0 | ceilometer --version | 21:34 |
| r0j4z0 | 1.0.10.23 | 21:34 |
| *** thomasem has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 21:37 | |
| dmsimard | r0j4z0: You're right, I can't reproduce on Icehouse. We're not quite there yet, soon. I might not spend that much time on the issue if it's fixed in a later version. | 21:47 |
| *** _nadya_ has quit IRC | 21:50 | |
| *** sileht has quit IRC | 21:52 | |
| r0j4z0 | yes | 21:52 |
| r0j4z0 | can i ask you something? | 21:52 |
| r0j4z0 | why are you want to use UDP? | 21:53 |
| dmsimard | We want to use the ceilometer swift-proxy middleware. The Swift infrastructure is entirely public while the message bus is entirely private (with the remainder of the Opentack infra). Exposing a (restricted) ceilometer-collector is not as bad as opening up a path directly to either the bus or the database backend. | 21:56 |
| dmsimard | One of the other options I've studied was to use the file publisher and have a daemon post the samples to the ceilometer API endpoint but that brings some scalability issues | 21:57 |
| r0j4z0 | aha cool | 21:58 |
| dmsimard | ceilometer-agent-central can talk to swift just fine and can pull most metrics but the api calls/bytes in/bytes out are notified by the middleware | 21:59 |
| *** sileht has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 21:59 | |
| dmsimard | It would be ideal if ceilometer-agent-central could pull the metrics provided by the middleware, or pull the file from the file publisher | 21:59 |
| r0j4z0 | yes | 22:00 |
| *** promulo has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 22:00 | |
| r0j4z0 | you are confortable with ceilometer? i just start to use it | 22:01 |
| r0j4z0 | im learning a bit of it | 22:01 |
| dmsimard | Well, the ceilometer project is still very young compared to projects like swift or nova :) | 22:02 |
| dmsimard | It was made official in grizzly I think | 22:02 |
| r0j4z0 | im trying to use it to make some kind of event triggering | 22:03 |
| r0j4z0 | but is a bit maze how it treats the events | 22:04 |
| r0j4z0 | ceilometer dont have event alarming by default | 22:04 |
| *** sileht has quit IRC | 22:04 | |
| r0j4z0 | and im trying to figure how to implement it but i cant do things work... | 22:04 |
| *** sileht has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 22:06 | |
| *** Longgeek has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 22:09 | |
| dmsimard | r0j4z0: The documentation could be better | 22:09 |
| r0j4z0 | yes... | 22:10 |
| r0j4z0 | is a bit frustrating search during hours for a parameter and then found it in the less probable place | 22:11 |
| r0j4z0 | for example to tell ceilometer to store the events on the database, the only place where that option is "documented" is on the ceilometer.conf example file | 22:12 |
| r0j4z0 | event processing and storing is one of the "star" features! | 22:12 |
| r0j4z0 | i spend 2 days to found it | 22:13 |
| r0j4z0 | xDD | 22:13 |
| *** admin0 has quit IRC | 22:13 | |
| *** Longgeek has quit IRC | 22:13 | |
| *** nati_ueno has quit IRC | 22:14 | |
| *** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 22:14 | |
| r0j4z0 | but i think is a really grate project and really openstack needed somthing like this | 22:16 |
| *** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 22:17 | |
| *** gordc has quit IRC | 22:27 | |
| *** admin0 has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 22:39 | |
| *** pnascimento has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 22:50 | |
| *** nati_uen_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 22:59 | |
| *** safchain_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 22:59 | |
| *** nati_uen_ has quit IRC | 22:59 | |
| *** nati_uen_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 23:00 | |
| *** safchain has quit IRC | 23:03 | |
| *** nati_ueno has quit IRC | 23:03 | |
| pnascimento | DinaBelova: I have already edited devsatack/lib/ceilometer, but still no signs of nothing on the collector node | 23:04 |
| *** ddieterly has quit IRC | 23:06 | |
| *** Longgeek has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 23:10 | |
| *** admin0 has quit IRC | 23:11 | |
| *** Longgeek has quit IRC | 23:15 | |
| *** fnaval has quit IRC | 23:19 | |
| *** nati_uen_ has quit IRC | 23:22 | |
| *** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 23:23 | |
| *** nati_uen_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 23:24 | |
| *** nati_ueno has quit IRC | 23:27 | |
| *** joesavak has quit IRC | 23:35 | |
| *** fnaval has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 23:41 | |
| *** nati_uen_ has quit IRC | 23:48 | |
| *** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 23:52 | |
| *** nati_uen_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 23:54 | |
| *** jaypipes has quit IRC | 23:55 | |
| *** nati_ueno has quit IRC | 23:57 | |
| *** matsuhashi has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 23:59 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!