*** Qiming has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 00:08 | |
*** _cjones_ has quit IRC | 00:09 | |
*** _cjones_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 00:10 | |
*** sdake_ has quit IRC | 00:12 | |
*** terriyu has quit IRC | 00:13 | |
*** _cjones_ has quit IRC | 00:14 | |
*** rbowen has quit IRC | 00:17 | |
*** r-daneel has quit IRC | 00:17 | |
*** dmsimard_away is now known as dmsimard | 00:22 | |
*** Qiming has quit IRC | 00:29 | |
*** dmsimard is now known as dmsimard_away | 00:42 | |
*** sbfox has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 00:56 | |
openstackgerrit | Ren Qiaowei proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: XenAPI support: Update measurements documentation https://review.openstack.org/114874 | 00:56 |
---|---|---|
*** renatoarmani has quit IRC | 00:59 | |
*** sdake_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 01:05 | |
*** sbfox has quit IRC | 01:13 | |
*** sbfox has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 01:21 | |
*** sbfox has quit IRC | 01:22 | |
*** sdake_ has quit IRC | 01:31 | |
*** ccrouch1 has quit IRC | 01:36 | |
*** Qiming has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 01:41 | |
*** sdake_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 01:46 | |
*** thomasem_ has quit IRC | 01:48 | |
*** nosnos has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 01:49 | |
*** sbfox has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 01:52 | |
*** yasukun has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 02:00 | |
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC | 02:02 | |
*** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 02:02 | |
openstackgerrit | A change was merged to openstack/ceilometer: XenAPI support: List the instances https://review.openstack.org/112244 | 02:05 |
*** nsaje has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 02:13 | |
openstackgerrit | OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/110096 | 02:20 |
*** sbfox has quit IRC | 02:27 | |
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 02:32 | |
*** Yanyanhu has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 02:43 | |
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC | 02:45 | |
*** yasukun has quit IRC | 02:53 | |
*** yasukun has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 02:54 | |
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 03:04 | |
*** sdake_ has quit IRC | 03:05 | |
*** sdake_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 03:06 | |
openstackgerrit | A change was merged to openstack/ceilometer: Permit usage of notifications for metering https://review.openstack.org/80225 | 03:19 |
*** nosnos has quit IRC | 03:26 | |
*** nosnos has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 03:27 | |
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC | 03:27 | |
*** Longgeek has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 03:31 | |
*** nosnos has quit IRC | 03:32 | |
*** sbfox has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 03:56 | |
*** mitz_ has quit IRC | 03:59 | |
*** mitz has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 03:59 | |
*** sbfox has quit IRC | 04:09 | |
*** sbfox has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 04:21 | |
*** nosnos has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 04:27 | |
openstackgerrit | Rikimaru Honjo proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Add validate alarm_actions schema in alarm API https://review.openstack.org/107330 | 04:33 |
*** stevelle has quit IRC | 04:41 | |
openstackgerrit | Srinivas Sakhamuri proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Get meters query performance improvements using index https://review.openstack.org/116748 | 04:49 |
*** Longgeek_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 04:52 | |
*** Longgeek has quit IRC | 04:56 | |
*** idegtiarov has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 05:05 | |
*** stevelle_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 05:10 | |
*** asalkeld has quit IRC | 05:19 | |
*** stevelle_ is now known as stevelle | 05:23 | |
openstackgerrit | OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/110096 | 05:34 |
*** asalkeld has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 05:37 | |
*** sbfox has quit IRC | 05:38 | |
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 05:53 | |
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC | 06:01 | |
*** k4n0 has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 06:03 | |
*** taplax has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 06:05 | |
openstackgerrit | OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Imported Translations from Transifex https://review.openstack.org/115508 | 06:09 |
openstackgerrit | Ren Qiaowei proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: XenAPI support: Update measurements documentation https://review.openstack.org/114874 | 06:10 |
*** ildikov has quit IRC | 06:32 | |
*** ildikov has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 06:54 | |
*** harlowja_ is now known as harlowja_away | 07:14 | |
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 07:15 | |
openstackgerrit | Nejc Saje proposed a change to openstack/python-ceilometerclient: Revamp documentation, add module references https://review.openstack.org/117140 | 07:35 |
*** arezmerita has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 07:38 | |
*** asalkeld has quit IRC | 07:51 | |
*** IvanBerezovskiy has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 07:55 | |
*** yasukun has quit IRC | 08:00 | |
*** Qiming_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 08:02 | |
*** Qiming has quit IRC | 08:05 | |
*** asalkeld has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 08:05 | |
openstackgerrit | Zhai, Edwin proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Add IPMI support https://review.openstack.org/115845 | 08:11 |
openstackgerrit | Igor Degtiarov proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Adding comparison operators in query for event traits https://review.openstack.org/112582 | 08:11 |
idegtiarov | ildikov: hi! could you look on cr https://review.openstack.org/#/c/115277/ which implements some new functions that are needed for migration in HBase | 08:17 |
*** boris-42 has quit IRC | 08:21 | |
openstackgerrit | Nejc Saje proposed a change to openstack/python-ceilometerclient: Revamp documentation, add module references https://review.openstack.org/117140 | 08:22 |
*** yassine has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 08:27 | |
ildikov | idegtiarov: is there any reason for this tiny function is in a separate patch from migration? | 08:31 |
*** boris-42 has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 08:31 | |
ildikov | idegtiarov: IIUC it is needed by the migration patch | 08:31 |
openstackgerrit | Mehdi Abaakouk proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Alarm: Use stevedore to load the service class https://review.openstack.org/117198 | 08:35 |
DinaBelova | nsaje, o/ | 08:37 |
nsaje | DinaBelova: o/ | 08:37 |
DinaBelova | we've tried two compute agents | 08:38 |
nsaje | and? | 08:38 |
DinaBelova | on the compute node | 08:38 |
DinaBelova | hehe | 08:38 |
DinaBelova | first polling was ok (they were in the group, etc) | 08:38 |
DinaBelova | we could see them in the group | 08:38 |
DinaBelova | in the ZK | 08:38 |
DinaBelova | the second one was without errors but then they were 'members of the gorup []' | 08:38 |
DinaBelova | and third polling cycle - ToozError | 08:39 |
DinaBelova | as they were not in the group | 08:39 |
nsaje | hmm | 08:39 |
nsaje | so apparently tooz zookeeper backend has issues | 08:40 |
idegtiarov | ildikov: actually there is long story, i have proposed a cr with redesigning separator in HBase, but before it could land we need migration in HBase, and ityaptin who implements migration ask for this change to use functions that are added here | 08:40 |
DinaBelova | nsaje, even smth really strange - http://paste2.org/Eyxz33Dh | 08:41 |
DinaBelova | these logs are followed one by one | 08:41 |
DinaBelova | one cycle justempty subset | 08:42 |
DinaBelova | one cycle error | 08:42 |
DinaBelova | and so far and so on | 08:42 |
nsaje | yeah, it's the intended behaviour that the subset is empty if coordination backend fails | 08:43 |
DinaBelova | a-ha, ok | 08:43 |
nsaje | so as to avoid duplicates | 08:43 |
nsaje | it's weird that there's no exception text coming from tooz | 08:43 |
nsaje | just a toozerror | 08:44 |
*** asalkeld has quit IRC | 08:45 | |
openstackgerrit | Mehdi Abaakouk proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Allow to requeue a sample https://review.openstack.org/112225 | 08:45 |
openstackgerrit | Mehdi Abaakouk proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Document pipeline publishers configuration https://review.openstack.org/114919 | 08:45 |
nsaje | modify https://github.com/stackforge/tooz/blob/master/tooz/drivers/zookeeper.py#L128 to wrap the exception itself, not string | 08:45 |
nsaje | so you'll see what's the error in kazoo | 08:45 |
nsaje | or better yet, use | 08:46 |
*** nosnos has quit IRC | 08:47 | |
*** nosnos has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 08:47 | |
ildikov | idegtiarov: I was just wondering that if these functions are used now only in the migartion patch, then why don't merge these two | 08:48 |
*** flwang1 has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 08:48 | |
nsaje | DinaBelova: http://paste.openstack.org/show/101558/ | 08:49 |
*** nosnos has quit IRC | 08:52 | |
DinaBelova | nsaje, ehm, they are ok for now 0_0 | 08:55 |
DinaBelova | nsaje, that is strange | 08:55 |
DinaBelova | I don't actually like this unpredictable behaviour 0_0 | 08:56 |
DinaBelova | nsaje, hehe, I know why currently they are ok :D for some reason no disk meters were collected | 08:58 |
*** asalkeld has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 08:58 | |
DinaBelova | and nothing went worng | 08:58 |
DinaBelova | wrong* | 08:58 |
idegtiarov | ildikov: you mean why them haven't been merged yet or why doesn't Ilya just use them in his patch? :) | 09:03 |
ildikov | idegtiarov: I meant that why this patch wasn't merged into Ilya's patch, as it is really does not have any context in this way | 09:06 |
DinaBelova | nsaje, yeah, compute agents stopped to poll :) | 09:10 |
openstackgerrit | ling-yun proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: ignore .idea folder in ceilometer https://review.openstack.org/117459 | 09:11 |
idegtiarov | ildikov: probably he doesn't want to use functions that were proposed in other patch before this patch is merged | 09:11 |
ildikov | idegtiarov: you mean the redesign separator patch? | 09:12 |
idegtiarov | ildikov: yep | 09:12 |
nsaje | DinaBelova: why was that? | 09:13 |
DinaBelova | I don't know :D | 09:13 |
DinaBelova | let me restart them once more :) | 09:13 |
*** alexpilotti has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 09:18 | |
ildikov | idegtiarov: I understand that part, it's just looks weird now, as it is without context, I mean there are three tiny functions without any test or usage example and I have to dig into the migration patch anyway to see where these functions are used | 09:23 |
*** nosnos has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 09:24 | |
ildikov | idegtiarov: so I kinda agree with jd__'s comment there | 09:24 |
*** Qiming__ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 09:24 | |
idegtiarov | ildikov: k, thanks for your time | 09:26 |
DinaBelova | nsaje, one more question | 09:28 |
DinaBelova | is that the normal situation when one compute agent on the compute node polls all the VMs and other does nothing? | 09:28 |
*** Qiming_ has quit IRC | 09:28 | |
nsaje | DinaBelova: no, what are the group memberships reported? | 09:31 |
ildikov | idegtiarov: np, I will try to get to the comparsion operator patch a bit later today | 09:31 |
DinaBelova | nsaje, oh, sorry, let me change the question | 09:31 |
idegtiarov | ildikov: thank you very much. hope this time it could be landed | 09:31 |
DinaBelova | one compute agents polls one set of meters (for all the VMs) and other polls other (for all the VMs as well) | 09:31 |
DinaBelova | nsaje ^^ | 09:32 |
nsaje | DinaBelova: nope, that's not the way it's supposed to work :-) they should divide the VMs, not the meters | 09:32 |
DinaBelova | hehe | 09:33 |
DinaBelova | nsaje, well :D | 09:33 |
nsaje | DinaBelova: there's nothing in the code that would limit which meters are processed | 09:34 |
nsaje | DinaBelova: do you have different pollsters configured? | 09:34 |
DinaBelova | no | 09:34 |
DinaBelova | they use the same file | 09:34 |
nsaje | DinaBelova: and is the group membership correctly reported? | 09:34 |
DinaBelova | :D:D:D | 09:34 |
DinaBelova | it looks like that | 09:34 |
DinaBelova | screen was crashed | 09:34 |
DinaBelova | and lost the long buffer I configured | 09:35 |
DinaBelova | I'll increase it now and will look | 09:35 |
ildikov | idegtiarov: hope so too | 09:35 |
nsaje | DinaBelova: when I tested it single-node, I got with the first agent 'debug: my subset [Server1,Server4]' and on the other 'debug: my subset [Server2, Server3]' | 09:36 |
DinaBelova | ok, I'll try it once more :d | 09:36 |
DinaBelova | :D | 09:36 |
DinaBelova | (wall) | 09:39 |
DinaBelova | No group id defined, returning the whole iterable. | 09:39 |
* DinaBelova is going to go and die | 09:39 | |
DinaBelova | hey duplicated the work | 09:40 |
DinaBelova | they* | 09:40 |
DinaBelova | wtf | 09:41 |
DinaBelova | they behave strange! | 09:41 |
nsaje | DinaBelova: you don't have workload_partitioning option enabled in the [compute] section of ceilometer config | 09:41 |
nsaje | DinaBelova: compute isn't partitioned by default | 09:41 |
DinaBelova | nsaje, a-ha, yeah, I did that on the wrong compute | 09:42 |
DinaBelova | nsaje, okay | 09:45 |
DinaBelova | so the result | 09:45 |
*** yassine has quit IRC | 09:55 | |
DinaBelova | on the multimode with multiple compute agents on one node they share the load by VMs (with all meters per VM) | 09:57 |
nsaje | great! | 09:59 |
nsaje | that's how it's supposed to work! | 10:00 |
DinaBelova | nsaje, am I right that Neutron (that has the default discovery) should be polled by central agents ok by your change? | 10:00 |
DinaBelova | nsaje, ok | 10:00 |
DinaBelova | cool-cool | 10:00 |
nsaje | let's see, neutron | 10:00 |
*** Yanyanhu has quit IRC | 10:00 | |
DinaBelova | like ip.floating, etc | 10:00 |
nsaje | (I'm just in the process of figuring out how best to migrate everytihng to discovery model) | 10:00 |
nsaje | no, ip.floating won't work yet | 10:00 |
DinaBelova | ehm, why? | 10:00 |
*** isviridov is now known as isviridov_awa | 10:00 | |
*** isviridov_awa is now known as isviridov_awat | 10:00 | |
nsaje | ah | 10:00 |
*** isviridov_awat is now known as isviridov_away | 10:00 | |
nsaje | let me check | 10:01 |
DinaBelova | ok | 10:01 |
nsaje | because ip.floating polls nova, not neutron | 10:01 |
nsaje | (I don't really know why this isn't in compute agent) | 10:01 |
DinaBelova | o_0 | 10:01 |
nsaje | DinaBelova: https://github.com/openstack/ceilometer/blob/master/ceilometer/network/floatingip.py#L34 | 10:02 |
DinaBelova | nsaje, well | 10:02 |
DinaBelova | what can I poll via central agent?! | 10:02 |
DinaBelova | for that thing to work? | 10:03 |
nsaje | DinaBelova: gimme a sec | 10:03 |
DinaBelova | nsaje, ok :) | 10:03 |
nsaje | DinaBelova: you're not going to like this :) just the ones that have 'discovery:' param specified https://github.com/openstack/ceilometer/blob/master/etc/ceilometer/pipeline.yaml | 10:04 |
nsaje | DinaBelova: others don't use discoveries yet | 10:05 |
DinaBelova | >_< | 10:05 |
DinaBelova | hehe | 10:05 |
DinaBelova | vpnaas, lbaas and fwaas | 10:05 |
nsaje | DinaBelova: but I think your tests on compute indicate that at least the code is working as intended | 10:05 |
DinaBelova | magical thing | 10:05 |
nsaje | DinaBelova: (as it's literally the same code, just different entry point) | 10:05 |
DinaBelova | well, yeah | 10:05 |
nsaje | DinaBelova: even if the final functionality isn't yet there for the central agent, because it'll take additional patches | 10:06 |
*** Qiming__ has quit IRC | 10:08 | |
DinaBelova | nsaje, so you're planning to give more patches *before* your change | 10:08 |
DinaBelova | to allow discovery model everywhere | 10:08 |
nsaje | DinaBelova: yes, though there is no code dependency between the patches | 10:08 |
DinaBelova | nsaje, yeah, but his discovery thing needs to go first | 10:09 |
DinaBelova | this* | 10:09 |
nsaje | DinaBelova: yep, workin' on it | 10:09 |
DinaBelova | okay | 10:09 |
*** nosnos has quit IRC | 10:20 | |
*** nosnos has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 10:21 | |
*** nosnos has quit IRC | 10:25 | |
DinaBelova | nsaje, btw - do I understand write that compute agents works only because you've added some code to the compute.discovery? | 10:28 |
DinaBelova | and that's it? | 10:28 |
nsaje | DinaBelova: yes | 10:29 |
DinaBelova | a-ha | 10:29 |
nsaje | DinaBelova: well, not exactly, it would work even if I wouldn't add that code | 10:29 |
DinaBelova | with sharing the load? | 10:29 |
nsaje | DinaBelova: yes, but only if there was a single node | 10:29 |
DinaBelova | a-ha | 10:30 |
nsaje | DinaBelova: the added code in compute discovery makes sure that compute agents are grouped by node | 10:30 |
DinaBelova | okay, gotca | 10:30 |
DinaBelova | okay, gotcha* | 10:30 |
openstackgerrit | Igor Degtiarov proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: [HBase] Catch AlreadyExists error in Connection upgrade https://review.openstack.org/113504 | 10:31 |
openstackgerrit | Igor Degtiarov proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: [HBase] Add migration script for new row separate design https://review.openstack.org/115615 | 10:32 |
*** nosnos has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 10:34 | |
*** isviridov_away is now known as isviridov | 10:37 | |
openstackgerrit | Mehdi Abaakouk proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Allow to requeue a sample https://review.openstack.org/112225 | 10:43 |
openstackgerrit | Mehdi Abaakouk proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Document pipeline publishers configuration https://review.openstack.org/114919 | 10:43 |
nsaje | DinaBelova: do you still have multinode devstack up? | 10:54 |
DinaBelova | yep | 10:54 |
DinaBelova | nsaje ^^ | 10:54 |
nsaje | DinaBelova: can you execute 'keystone endpoint-get --service compute' for me? | 10:55 |
nsaje | DinaBelova: I'd like to see what that outputs on a multinode setup | 10:55 |
DinaBelova | nsaje - http://paste2.org/5sKtdyjP | 10:56 |
DinaBelova | strange a little bit | 10:56 |
DinaBelova | as we're having 3 compute nodes actually | 10:56 |
nsaje | DinaBelova: yeah | 10:56 |
DinaBelova | nsaje, btw, it'll be the same output is this will be processed from other compute node | 10:58 |
DinaBelova | just keystone endpoint, and that's it | 10:58 |
nsaje | DinaBelova: I guess I don't understand keystone enough | 10:58 |
* DinaBelova as well | 10:58 | |
nsaje | you do have nova-api running on each node right? | 10:59 |
DinaBelova | no, only onthe controller | 10:59 |
DinaBelova | ah | 11:00 |
DinaBelova | that's actually normal :) | 11:00 |
nsaje | ok | 11:00 |
DinaBelova | one controller two computes | 11:00 |
DinaBelova | I may run one more api service | 11:00 |
DinaBelova | and look on what will happen | 11:00 |
nsaje | so IIUC, you have a controller node and two compute nodes | 11:01 |
nsaje | and then ceilometer-agent-compute on each of those compute nodes? | 11:01 |
DinaBelova | yep, and controller might be compute as well | 11:01 |
DinaBelova | yes | 11:01 |
nsaje | which then polls the controller node about its compute node | 11:01 |
DinaBelova | nsaje, why should it? | 11:02 |
nsaje | well, it polls nova API | 11:02 |
nsaje | so it polls the controller node, right? | 11:02 |
DinaBelova | ah, yeah | 11:02 |
DinaBelova | but it polls only for some of the meters | 11:02 |
nsaje | yes | 11:03 |
DinaBelova | yep | 11:03 |
nsaje | (only for the meters for VMs on its own compute node) | 11:03 |
DinaBelova | (nod) | 11:03 |
DinaBelova | sorry, need to go afk for a moment | 11:03 |
nsaje | this was an easy way to 'scale' compute, but don't you think the partitioning code obsoletes that? | 11:03 |
nsaje | perhaps we could even merge central&compute back together and to the scaling via the partitioning code | 11:04 |
nsaje | (just thinking out loud) | 11:04 |
*** ildikov has quit IRC | 11:05 | |
*** ildikov has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 11:07 | |
*** ildikov has quit IRC | 11:12 | |
*** nosnos has quit IRC | 11:18 | |
*** nosnos has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 11:20 | |
*** Qiming has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 11:24 | |
DinaBelova | nsaje, well, I guess that currently that will make sense - just set local_instances as discover for this *agent* and that's it | 11:26 |
DinaBelova | although we need more eyes here :S | 11:27 |
nsaje | DinaBelova: that's K- effort anyway, running out of time for juno | 11:27 |
DinaBelova | yeah, for sure | 11:27 |
DinaBelova | now we need to understand what to do with the discovery thing :) | 11:28 |
*** flwang1 has quit IRC | 11:57 | |
*** cdent has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 11:59 | |
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC | 12:02 | |
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 12:02 | |
openstackgerrit | Mehdi Abaakouk proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Alarm: Use stevedore to load the service class https://review.openstack.org/117198 | 12:02 |
*** foexle has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 12:11 | |
foexle | hi guys, i've a short question about the ceilometer-expirer. I don't find any documentations about it so i need to ask :) ... how i understood the process should look at all schemas > TTL and delete it correct ? | 12:13 |
foexle | if i've ttl = -1 all schemas will be store anytime | 12:13 |
*** erecio has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 12:18 | |
*** cdent has quit IRC | 12:19 | |
*** nosnos has quit IRC | 12:22 | |
*** nosnos has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 12:23 | |
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC | 12:26 | |
nsaje | foexle: yes | 12:27 |
*** nosnos has quit IRC | 12:27 | |
*** sdake_ has quit IRC | 12:28 | |
foexle | nsaje: ok thx for your answer, but the expirer is running noch over 30 min and my database size is the same | 12:28 |
foexle | ttl is set >0 | 12:28 |
nsaje | which DB are you using? not all DB backends support it | 12:28 |
foexle | mongodb | 12:29 |
foexle | i dont see any deletes in mongostat | 12:29 |
nsaje | foexle: mongodb should work, you're right | 12:29 |
nsaje | foexle: let me check, there were some changes to the services, perhaps some bug creeped in | 12:30 |
foexle | nsaje: Version: 2013.2.3-0ubuntu1~cloud0 | 12:30 |
foexle | nsaje: mongodb: 2.4.8 | 12:31 |
*** julim has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 12:33 | |
*** sdake_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 12:34 | |
*** julim has quit IRC | 12:35 | |
*** gordc has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 12:37 | |
*** julim has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 12:39 | |
nsaje | foexle: in this case it's not some fresh bug, you're using havana. I don't have enough mongo-foo to help you out right now, sorry. Take a look at the code https://github.com/openstack/ceilometer/blob/2013.2/ceilometer/storage/impl_mongodb.py#L425 or file a bug report | 12:39 |
*** urulama has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 12:39 | |
*** Yanyanhu has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 12:43 | |
*** urulama has left #openstack-ceilometer | 12:48 | |
*** asalkeld has quit IRC | 12:49 | |
*** sdake_ has quit IRC | 12:54 | |
*** sdake_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 12:55 | |
*** rbowen has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 12:57 | |
*** itisit has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 12:59 | |
foexle | nsaje: all right, thanks :) | 13:00 |
*** urulama has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 13:04 | |
*** urulama has left #openstack-ceilometer | 13:04 | |
*** jaypipes has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 13:09 | |
*** k4n0 has quit IRC | 13:10 | |
*** sdake_ has quit IRC | 13:11 | |
openstackgerrit | Eric Pendergrass proposed a change to openstack/python-ceilometerclient: Verify alarm found before modifying https://review.openstack.org/110345 | 13:14 |
*** cdent has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 13:32 | |
openstackgerrit | A change was merged to stackforge/gnocchi: swift: avoid doing a HEAD to check container presence https://review.openstack.org/116276 | 13:37 |
*** joesavak has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 13:42 | |
*** rbak has quit IRC | 13:43 | |
*** jsavak has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 13:44 | |
openstackgerrit | Julien Danjou proposed a change to stackforge/gnocchi: storage: implement archiving policy https://review.openstack.org/113555 | 13:46 |
openstackgerrit | Julien Danjou proposed a change to stackforge/gnocchi: storage: add support for creating storage policies https://review.openstack.org/116661 | 13:46 |
openstackgerrit | Julien Danjou proposed a change to stackforge/gnocchi: indexer: make entities be resources https://review.openstack.org/117246 | 13:46 |
*** joesavak has quit IRC | 13:48 | |
openstackgerrit | Rikimaru Honjo proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Add validate alarm_actions schema in alarm API https://review.openstack.org/107330 | 13:51 |
*** thomasem has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 13:56 | |
*** idegtiarov has left #openstack-ceilometer | 13:59 | |
*** idegtiarov has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 13:59 | |
*** pradk has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 13:59 | |
openstackgerrit | Julien Danjou proposed a change to stackforge/gnocchi: indexer: use sqlalchemy-utils for UUID type https://review.openstack.org/117519 | 14:00 |
*** taplax has quit IRC | 14:01 | |
*** r-daneel has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 14:05 | |
*** rbak has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 14:06 | |
*** claudiub has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 14:13 | |
*** sdake_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 14:13 | |
*** dmsimard_away is now known as dmsimard | 14:15 | |
openstackgerrit | Mehdi Abaakouk proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Allow to requeue a sample https://review.openstack.org/112225 | 14:17 |
openstackgerrit | Mehdi Abaakouk proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Document pipeline publishers configuration https://review.openstack.org/114919 | 14:17 |
htruta | hello, everyone! I want to have an alarm that is triggered when I get some kind of trend. For example, an alarm triggered when the cpu utilization growth is similar to a linear function. Is there any way to do this kind of job? I took a quick look on the code and saw that new evaluators can be created. is it a possible way? | 14:17 |
*** dmsimard has left #openstack-ceilometer | 14:18 | |
*** raildo has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 14:21 | |
openstackgerrit | Piyush Masrani proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer-specs: VMware Vsphere Declarative polling spec https://review.openstack.org/105130 | 14:24 |
*** Longgeek_ has quit IRC | 14:24 | |
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 14:25 | |
*** Qiming has quit IRC | 14:30 | |
openstackgerrit | Phil Neal proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Document the standard for PaaS service notifications https://review.openstack.org/113396 | 14:32 |
*** sdake_ has quit IRC | 14:33 | |
*** dragondm has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 14:40 | |
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC | 14:40 | |
*** fabiog has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 14:50 | |
*** ildikov has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 14:51 | |
*** shengjiemin has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 14:53 | |
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 14:58 | |
*** thomasem has quit IRC | 14:59 | |
*** nealph has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 14:59 | |
*** thomasem has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 15:02 | |
*** yassine has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 15:06 | |
*** underyx|off is now known as underyx | 15:06 | |
*** jsavak has quit IRC | 15:07 | |
*** sdake_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 15:07 | |
*** joesavak has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 15:07 | |
*** joesavak has quit IRC | 15:07 | |
*** sbfox has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 15:31 | |
*** sbfox has quit IRC | 15:31 | |
*** IvanBerezovskiy has left #openstack-ceilometer | 15:33 | |
*** foexle has quit IRC | 15:35 | |
*** sdake_ has quit IRC | 15:35 | |
*** Yanyanhu has quit IRC | 15:38 | |
*** nealph has quit IRC | 15:40 | |
*** _cjones_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 15:46 | |
*** KurtRao has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 15:59 | |
jd__ | ok SQLAlchemy expert, here's my problem http://paste.openstack.org/show/101806/ | 16:00 |
ildikov | fabiog: but devstack creates the url with v2.0 IIRC | 16:00 |
gordc | i blame all of your for tacking on an extra 30mins to meeting.lol | 16:00 |
jd__ | :D | 16:01 |
nsaje | haha | 16:01 |
fabiog | ildikov: so the Keystone client only accepts V3 calls in port 35357 | 16:01 |
ildikov | gordc: business as usual :) | 16:01 |
jd__ | gonna post my problem on Twitter so I can relax and wait for people to write my code | 16:01 |
cdent | jd__ that paste makes no sense | 16:02 |
ildikov | fabiog: ok, so that is where the problem originates | 16:02 |
gordc | jd__: i was going to type you're going to get a bunch of people trolling you if you post to twitter | 16:02 |
fabiog | ildikov: yes, basically if you are using port 35357 you have to have a V3 compliant request | 16:03 |
fabiog | because that is the admin port | 16:03 |
fabiog | port 5000 supports both V3 and V2 (it is both the internal an public port) | 16:03 |
gordc | jd__: you can just define a relationship no? | 16:03 |
*** nealph has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 16:03 | |
fabiog | ildikov: if this is not acceptable, we need to ask the Keystone guys to enable V2 on 35357 on devstack, because the current default is V3 only | 16:04 |
ildikov | fabiog: I should have thought as I didn't find any other code related issues... :) | 16:04 |
fabiog | ildikov: AFAIK, the only service that uses that port is Horizon and services can use it to vaildate tokens | 16:04 |
fabiog | gordc: can we close the bug then? | 16:05 |
cdent | jd__: a_name = relationship('A', backref='name') # might be close to what you want | 16:06 |
*** erecio has quit IRC | 16:06 | |
cdent | But I'm not sure because your desired SQL is confused | 16:06 |
gordc | cdent: that returns entire A obj.. not just attribute... although i guess it works still. | 16:07 |
jd__ | what's confusing? | 16:08 |
cdent | you've got two from | 16:08 |
jd__ | AFAIU backref adds an attribute on A, not on B | 16:09 |
cdent | yeah, backref not needed | 16:09 |
gordc | fabiog: just to clarify, what scenario causes the error to show up? if you use v2 against 35357? | 16:09 |
cdent | jd__ can you point to real code? | 16:09 |
gordc | jd__: that's right. | 16:09 |
fabiog | gordc: exactly | 16:10 |
fabiog | only that | 16:10 |
jd__ | cdent: not sure that would be less confusing :)) | 16:10 |
gordc | have we always been pointing to 35357? or is this more a custom configuration issue | 16:11 |
gordc | fabiog: ^ | 16:11 |
cdent | jd__ I'm only asking because I don't really understand what you are trying to do, so thought some context might help | 16:11 |
jd__ | cdent: let me try | 16:11 |
openstackgerrit | Julien Danjou proposed a change to stackforge/gnocchi: storage: implement archiving policy https://review.openstack.org/113555 | 16:11 |
openstackgerrit | Julien Danjou proposed a change to stackforge/gnocchi: indexer: make entities be resources https://review.openstack.org/117246 | 16:11 |
ildikov | gordc: devstack deploy the system with that port | 16:11 |
openstackgerrit | Julien Danjou proposed a change to stackforge/gnocchi: indexer: handle archive policies https://review.openstack.org/117551 | 16:11 |
jd__ | cdent: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/117551/ | 16:11 |
jd__ | cdent: in the test you can see I pass the name of the archive policy rather than the id, I'd like the ORM to automatically resolve it to the archive policy id | 16:12 |
gordc | ildikov: hmm.. but why would it point to 35357 if it only works for v3 | 16:12 |
fabiog | gordc: I think we have always pointed to 5000, isn't that the standard port in the Ceilo conf? | 16:12 |
gordc | fabiog: to my knowledge yes | 16:12 |
*** erecio has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 16:13 | |
fabiog | gordc: if Ildikov thinks that there is a need for V2 on 35357 we can open a ticket ot Keystone to accept V2 on that port | 16:13 |
fabiog | my undestanding is that is a conf change | 16:13 |
fabiog | s/undestanding/understanding | 16:13 |
ildikov | gordc: TBH, I don't know, I thought it was used always, but now it has issues because of the versions | 16:14 |
gordc | yeah if the default conf settings make sense maybe the fix is to add doc | 16:14 |
*** foexle has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 16:14 | |
openstackgerrit | Nejc Saje proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Central agent work-load partitioning https://review.openstack.org/113549 | 16:15 |
openstackgerrit | Nejc Saje proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Switch partitioned alarm evaluation to a hash-based approach https://review.openstack.org/115237 | 16:15 |
cdent | thanks jd__, reading | 16:17 |
fabiog | gordc: I would close the bug, because ceilometer is using port 35357 for the token validation only and that is correct. If you use the Ceilometer Client you have to use the port 5000 because that is the non admin one. Maybe this needs to be made clear in the docs | 16:17 |
fabiog | gordc: and in devstack everything is working fine | 16:17 |
fabiog | ildikov: do you agree? | 16:18 |
*** isviridov is now known as isviridov_away | 16:18 | |
gordc | fabiog: i'd agree with that... doesn't seem like it's a backward compatibilty issue either... just a configuration error | 16:18 |
ildikov | fabiog: gordc: but I also do not get why 35357 is working only with v3..., but what fabiog suggests is fine with me | 16:19 |
fabiog | ildikov: can you please clarify this point with the Keystone folks? | 16:19 |
gordc | jd__: http://docs.sqlalchemy.org/en/rel_0_7/orm/extensions/hybrid.html#join-dependent-relationship-hybrid | 16:19 |
fabiog | I don't want to close the bug if you are not happy with the resolution | 16:20 |
gordc | jd__: i think that's the way if you don't want ot access attribute through object. | 16:20 |
jd__ | gordc: found that but that's jeberish | 16:20 |
gordc | lol | 16:20 |
fabiog | gordc: is not even a conf issue, is really a doc issue. We should let know that Ceilo client users should use port 5000 and not 35357 | 16:21 |
ildikov | fabiog: I'm not 100% sure that it would worth the effort with the Keystone folks, so we can close this bug, but it should be mentioned in the docs that how it should be used | 16:21 |
fabiog | ildikov: I actually ping a colleage and he gave me the explanation | 16:21 |
fabiog | ildikov: 35357 is the port for V3 only because it was introduced with V3 and 5000 is the legacy V2 port that supports also V3 | 16:22 |
ildikov | fabiog: I will add a note about this in the Admin guide, as I'm writing the related section now | 16:22 |
fabiog | ildikov: he claims that when (if) we all move to V3, 5000 will be deprecated | 16:22 |
gordc | jd__: you'll probably need to save it through objec then... ie. B.A.name | 16:22 |
jd__ | gordc: my problem is more assignation | 16:23 |
ildikov | fabiog: a-ha, ok, got it, actually I didn't really follow the port evolution within Keystone :) | 16:23 |
gordc | i've idea how to do it without more googling | 16:23 |
fabiog | ildikov: you don;t know how much fun you missed ;-) | 16:23 |
ildikov | fabiog: LOL :) | 16:23 |
gordc | no idea* | 16:24 |
ildikov | fabiog: and also thanks for clarifying the issue behind this "bug" | 16:25 |
fabiog | ildikov: no problem | 16:27 |
cdent | jd__ another option is to a) make the relationship as described above, create the archive object (in the session) by name, assign it to A, and then flush the session and let sqlA figured it out | 16:28 |
fabiog | ildikov: are you going to follow up on the docs side please? | 16:28 |
fabiog | gordc; can we close the bug then? | 16:28 |
jd__ | cdent: yeah that's what I wanted to avoid but I'll do that in the end I guess | 16:28 |
cdent | what's bad about that? | 16:28 |
openstackgerrit | James E. Blair proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Enhance compute diskio tests to handle multi instance https://review.openstack.org/114991 | 16:29 |
cdent | a = A(name='foo'); B.A=a; session.add(A), session.add(B); flush # <- very much guesstimate | 16:29 |
gordc | fabiog: i'm ok closing. just add a note i guess. we can always reopen if there's a debate. | 16:30 |
cdent | if your foreign keys are set up right, it ought to come out correct | 16:30 |
*** jaypipes has quit IRC | 16:30 | |
fabiog | gordc: thanks | 16:30 |
*** idegtiarov has quit IRC | 16:32 | |
* gordc grabbing lunch | 16:33 | |
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC | 16:34 | |
*** nealph has quit IRC | 16:35 | |
*** sbfox has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 16:39 | |
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 16:40 | |
*** KurtRao has quit IRC | 16:45 | |
*** KurtRao has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 16:46 | |
*** jaypipes has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 16:46 | |
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC | 16:49 | |
*** fabiog has quit IRC | 16:50 | |
*** yassine has quit IRC | 16:51 | |
*** lsmola has quit IRC | 16:56 | |
*** sbfox has quit IRC | 16:57 | |
*** sbfox has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 17:00 | |
*** harlowja_away is now known as harlowja_ | 17:03 | |
*** harlowja_ is now known as harlowja_away | 17:04 | |
*** harlowja_away is now known as harlowja_ | 17:09 | |
*** sdake_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 17:14 | |
*** erecio has quit IRC | 17:17 | |
*** erecio has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 17:20 | |
*** sdake_ has quit IRC | 17:22 | |
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 17:29 | |
pradk | gordc, ping | 17:31 |
gordc | pradk: whatsup? | 17:34 |
pradk | gordc, so looks like this got kicked out of the gate https://review.openstack.org/#/c/114991/ .. oslo common got updated in ceilometer since this patch? | 17:34 |
*** nsaje has quit IRC | 17:35 | |
gordc | pradk: yeah... it's going to be merge hell for next few weeks i think | 17:35 |
pradk | gordc, so instead of from ceilometer.openstack.common.fixture import mockpatch i need to do .. from oslotest import mockpatch ? | 17:36 |
gordc | i guess they're manually cleaning up gate since it's backed up so much. | 17:36 |
*** sdake_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 17:37 | |
*** zul has quit IRC | 17:37 | |
*** nsaje has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 17:37 | |
*** shakamunyi has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 17:41 | |
*** lynxbat has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 17:43 | |
gordc | pradk: whoops. didn't see that last message | 17:44 |
gordc | yeah. that's the correct fix | 17:44 |
*** sbfox has quit IRC | 17:45 | |
pradk | gordc, cool | 17:45 |
*** lynxbat has quit IRC | 17:45 | |
*** lynxbat has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 17:46 | |
*** zul has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 17:50 | |
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC | 17:57 | |
*** sdake_ has quit IRC | 17:57 | |
zhiyan | hi folks, when you ok, could you pls talk a look on this sample one: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/116672/ thanks! | 18:00 |
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 18:06 | |
*** sbfox has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 18:06 | |
*** sbfox1 has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 18:07 | |
*** sbfox has quit IRC | 18:11 | |
*** sdake has quit IRC | 18:12 | |
*** thomasem has quit IRC | 18:18 | |
*** sbfox has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 18:21 | |
*** sbfox1 has quit IRC | 18:21 | |
*** thomasem has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 18:24 | |
openstackgerrit | A change was merged to openstack/ceilometer: XenAPI support: Changes for cpu_util https://review.openstack.org/112453 | 18:33 |
openstackgerrit | A change was merged to openstack/ceilometer: In-code comments should start with `#`, not with `"""` https://review.openstack.org/115633 | 18:34 |
*** thomasem has quit IRC | 18:37 | |
openstackgerrit | A change was merged to openstack/python-ceilometerclient: Check if the alarm has time constraints field before displaying https://review.openstack.org/95713 | 18:40 |
*** sdake_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 18:40 | |
*** thomasem has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 18:41 | |
*** sdake_ has quit IRC | 18:42 | |
*** sdake has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 18:42 | |
*** sdake has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 18:42 | |
*** lynxbat has quit IRC | 18:49 | |
*** sbfox has quit IRC | 18:49 | |
*** cdent has quit IRC | 18:49 | |
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC | 18:54 | |
*** sdake has quit IRC | 18:56 | |
*** sbfox has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 18:57 | |
*** lynxbat has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 18:59 | |
*** sdake has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 19:02 | |
*** sdake has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 19:02 | |
*** lynxbat has quit IRC | 19:05 | |
*** lynxbat has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 19:07 | |
*** sbfox has quit IRC | 19:08 | |
*** sbfox1 has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 19:08 | |
*** sdake has quit IRC | 19:08 | |
*** lynxbat has quit IRC | 19:09 | |
*** sdake has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 19:09 | |
*** sdake has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 19:09 | |
*** chuck_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 19:14 | |
*** zul has quit IRC | 19:16 | |
*** chuck_ has quit IRC | 19:20 | |
*** zul has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 19:20 | |
*** sdake_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 19:23 | |
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC | 19:31 | |
*** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 19:32 | |
*** sdake_ has quit IRC | 19:36 | |
*** sdake_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 19:37 | |
*** sdake_ has quit IRC | 19:38 | |
*** sdake_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 19:38 | |
*** claudiub has quit IRC | 19:42 | |
openstackgerrit | A change was merged to openstack/ceilometer: add documentation for setting up api pipeline https://review.openstack.org/116917 | 19:58 |
openstackgerrit | A change was merged to openstack/ceilometer: Remove oslo middleware https://review.openstack.org/115681 | 19:59 |
*** sbfox1 has quit IRC | 20:08 | |
*** lynxbat has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 20:08 | |
*** flwang1 has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 20:13 | |
*** sbfox has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 20:13 | |
*** flwang1 has quit IRC | 20:16 | |
*** Dafna has quit IRC | 20:23 | |
*** mspreitz has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 20:28 | |
mspreitz | In recent DevStack installs, I am seeing ceilometer alarm evaluator fail to start , with this complaint: AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'import_object' | 20:28 |
mspreitz | Has anybody else tried a recent install of HEAD? | 20:28 |
gordc | mspreitz: there's a bug open for this: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ceilometer/+bug/1362006 | 20:29 |
gordc | err.. although it points to wrong patch. right one -> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/117198/ | 20:30 |
*** _slo has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 20:30 | |
*** foexle has quit IRC | 20:32 | |
mspreitz | gordc: what about https://review.openstack.org/#/c/116940/ ? | 20:32 |
*** promulo_ has quit IRC | 20:32 | |
gordc | mspreitz: it's an option... but we use stevedore in ceilometer and the current patch makes it fall more inline with 'ceilometer mantra' | 20:33 |
_slo | Does Ceilometer meter how much data was written within some Swift user account? | 20:33 |
gordc | _slo: not for user specifically. you'd have to filter by user to get that data. http://docs.openstack.org/developer/ceilometer/measurements.html#object-storage-swift | 20:35 |
mspreitz | gordc: by current patch you mean https://review.openstack.org/#/c/117198/ right? | 20:35 |
gordc | mspreitz: yes | 20:35 |
mspreitz | gordc: thanks | 20:36 |
gordc | np | 20:36 |
_slo | gordc: since Ceph is also now somehow integrated with Open Stack, does Celiometer also works with RadosGW object store within Ceph? | 20:37 |
gordc | _slo: not sure... not familir with Rados gateway... the actual incoming/outgoing bytes meters is built using a wsgi middleware filter... | 20:42 |
_slo | aha ok, possible not then, since I thing Ceph goes with FastCGI what matters pipes (aka WSGI) | 20:42 |
gordc | _slo: i see.. i guess it would require a different approach then. | 20:43 |
_slo | yes, probably | 20:43 |
*** sbfox has quit IRC | 20:43 | |
*** sbfox has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 20:43 | |
_slo | since Ceph is now integrated with openstack, does anyone know is there some middleware actual written , as is for Swift, that is actual usable? | 20:44 |
openstackgerrit | Phil Neal proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Document the standard for PaaS service notifications https://review.openstack.org/113396 | 20:47 |
*** jaypipes has quit IRC | 20:50 | |
gordc | _slo: may want to ask during non-american hours... a lot of the ceilometer devs are based in the americas | 20:51 |
stevelle | anyone able to confirm the date of the v2 REST API becoming stable? Was it 04 Apr 2013 (Grizzly)? | 20:57 |
*** thomasem has quit IRC | 21:02 | |
*** mspreitz has quit IRC | 21:04 | |
openstackgerrit | gordon chung proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Enhance compute diskio tests to handle multi instance https://review.openstack.org/114991 | 21:06 |
*** rbowen has quit IRC | 21:06 | |
*** foexle has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 21:15 | |
*** dhellmann is now known as dhellmann_ | 21:17 | |
openstackgerrit | A change was merged to openstack/ceilometer: XenAPI support: Memory Usage https://review.openstack.org/114867 | 21:19 |
openstackgerrit | Pradeep Kilambi proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Enhance compute diskio tests to handle multi instance https://review.openstack.org/114991 | 21:25 |
*** flwang_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 21:28 | |
*** flwang_ has quit IRC | 21:29 | |
*** _slo has quit IRC | 21:35 | |
*** alexpilotti has quit IRC | 21:47 | |
*** sbfox has quit IRC | 21:48 | |
*** sbfox has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 21:48 | |
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 21:54 | |
*** erecio has quit IRC | 21:57 | |
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC | 21:59 | |
*** asalkeld has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 22:02 | |
*** pradk has quit IRC | 22:12 | |
*** itisit has quit IRC | 22:13 | |
openstackgerrit | gordon chung proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: normalise resource data https://review.openstack.org/111313 | 22:25 |
openstackgerrit | gordon chung proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: switch to sqlalchemy core https://review.openstack.org/113524 | 22:26 |
*** gordc has quit IRC | 22:26 | |
*** sbfox has quit IRC | 22:44 | |
*** sbfox1 has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 22:44 | |
*** sbfox1 has quit IRC | 22:44 | |
*** sbfox has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 22:44 | |
openstackgerrit | A change was merged to openstack/ceilometer: update requirements https://review.openstack.org/116311 | 22:58 |
*** rbak has quit IRC | 23:01 | |
*** asalkeld has quit IRC | 23:01 | |
*** lynxbat has quit IRC | 23:01 | |
*** lynxbat has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 23:03 | |
*** lynxbat has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 23:04 | |
*** asalkeld has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 23:09 | |
*** sbfox has quit IRC | 23:25 | |
*** shakamunyi has quit IRC | 23:33 | |
*** KurtRao has quit IRC | 23:41 | |
*** lynxbat has quit IRC | 23:42 | |
*** lynxbat has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 23:46 | |
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC | 23:46 | |
*** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 23:47 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!