*** Kennan2 is now known as Kennan | 00:02 | |
*** julim has quit IRC | 00:39 | |
*** julim has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 00:40 | |
*** liusheng has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 01:10 | |
openstackgerrit | liusheng proposed openstack/ceilometer-specs: Improve Nova Instance metering https://review.openstack.org/209799 | 01:44 |
---|---|---|
*** Kennan has quit IRC | 02:02 | |
*** Kennan has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 02:02 | |
*** gordc has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 03:26 | |
gordc | will repost tomorrow but here is the starting etherpad for our survey question. please free to delete/add as you wish: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ceilometer-insight | 03:26 |
*** dikonoor has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 03:28 | |
*** julim has quit IRC | 03:30 | |
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC | 03:31 | |
*** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 03:31 | |
*** ddieterly has quit IRC | 03:39 | |
openstackgerrit | gordon chung proposed openstack/ceilometer: support custom timestamp https://review.openstack.org/215361 | 03:44 |
*** ankita_wagh has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 03:54 | |
*** gordc has quit IRC | 03:56 | |
*** yprokule has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 04:24 | |
*** fawadkhaliq has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 04:38 | |
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 04:40 | |
openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/ceilometer: disable non-metric meter definitions https://review.openstack.org/209266 | 04:42 |
*** ddieterly has quit IRC | 04:44 | |
openstackgerrit | Divya K Konoor proposed openstack/ceilometer: WIP Events RBAC needs scoped token https://review.openstack.org/212557 | 04:49 |
*** shardy_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 05:29 | |
*** shardy has quit IRC | 05:30 | |
*** shardy_ has quit IRC | 05:34 | |
*** shardy has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 05:34 | |
*** ankita_wagh has quit IRC | 05:41 | |
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 05:41 | |
*** ankita_wagh has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 05:41 | |
*** ddieterly has quit IRC | 05:46 | |
*** dikonoor has quit IRC | 06:04 | |
*** lsmola has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 06:11 | |
*** nadya has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 06:17 | |
*** nadya has quit IRC | 06:22 | |
*** ildikov has quit IRC | 06:38 | |
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 06:42 | |
*** ddieterly has quit IRC | 06:46 | |
openstackgerrit | Divya K Konoor proposed openstack/ceilometer: WIP Events RBAC needs scoped token https://review.openstack.org/212557 | 06:49 |
*** ankita_wagh has quit IRC | 07:05 | |
*** haigang has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 07:05 | |
*** haigang has quit IRC | 07:06 | |
*** I has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 07:06 | |
*** I is now known as Guest63057 | 07:07 | |
*** Guest63057 has quit IRC | 07:07 | |
*** haigang has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 07:07 | |
*** haigang has quit IRC | 07:09 | |
*** haigang has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 07:10 | |
*** ildikov has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 07:17 | |
*** cdent has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 07:28 | |
*** Ala has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 07:34 | |
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 07:42 | |
openstackgerrit | Mehdi Abaakouk (sileht) proposed openstack/ceilometer: integration: add some new tests https://review.openstack.org/215604 | 07:46 |
*** ddieterly has quit IRC | 07:47 | |
openstackgerrit | Mehdi Abaakouk (sileht) proposed openstack/gnocchi: DO NOT MERGE: integrated downscaling test https://review.openstack.org/215606 | 07:48 |
openstackgerrit | Mehdi Abaakouk (sileht) proposed openstack/ceilometer: gnocchi: move to jsonpath_rw_ext https://review.openstack.org/216012 | 07:51 |
openstackgerrit | Mehdi Abaakouk (sileht) proposed openstack/ceilometer: Use jsonpath_rw_ext for meter/event definitions https://review.openstack.org/215529 | 07:51 |
*** fawadkhaliq has quit IRC | 07:53 | |
*** nadya has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 07:59 | |
*** haigang has quit IRC | 08:06 | |
*** fawadkhaliq has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 08:07 | |
nadya | cdent, sileht, ildikov: hi filks! I've prepared a list of use-cases for customer survey https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/telemetry_use-cases . You may add your thoughts there or here | 08:11 |
* cdent looks | 08:11 | |
ildikov | hi nadya! Thanks! | 08:13 |
*** cdent has quit IRC | 08:34 | |
*** ityaptin has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 08:36 | |
openstackgerrit | Nadya Shakhat proposed openstack/ceilometer: Add doc about coordination for Notification Agent https://review.openstack.org/204132 | 08:37 |
*** cdent has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 08:37 | |
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 08:43 | |
openstackgerrit | Mehdi Abaakouk (sileht) proposed openstack/ceilometer: integration: add some new tests https://review.openstack.org/215604 | 08:45 |
*** ddieterly has quit IRC | 08:48 | |
*** fawadkhaliq has quit IRC | 08:52 | |
*** cdent has quit IRC | 09:27 | |
*** nadya has quit IRC | 09:31 | |
*** cdent has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 09:31 | |
*** nadya has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 09:31 | |
*** nadya has quit IRC | 09:32 | |
*** nadya has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 09:32 | |
*** nadya has quit IRC | 09:32 | |
*** nadya has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 09:33 | |
*** nadya has quit IRC | 09:33 | |
*** nadya has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 09:33 | |
*** fawadkhaliq has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 09:33 | |
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 09:44 | |
openstackgerrit | OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/ceilometer: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/215855 | 09:47 |
openstackgerrit | Chris Dent proposed openstack/gnocchi: Rudimentary support for influxdb in devstack plugin https://review.openstack.org/215313 | 09:48 |
*** ddieterly has quit IRC | 09:48 | |
*** shardy_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 09:53 | |
*** shardy has quit IRC | 09:54 | |
*** shardy_ has quit IRC | 09:58 | |
*** shardy has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 09:59 | |
cdent | jd__, sileht: less than awesome news on gnocchi+influxdb: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnocchi/+bug/1488027 | 10:06 |
openstack | Launchpad bug 1488027 in Gnocchi "The gnocchi wsgi app experiences timeout errors when using influxdb" [Undecided,New] | 10:06 |
*** lan_ has quit IRC | 10:08 | |
*** Kennan has quit IRC | 10:09 | |
*** Kennan has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 10:10 | |
*** lan_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 10:21 | |
*** ekarlso has quit IRC | 10:32 | |
*** ekarlso has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 10:32 | |
*** cdent has quit IRC | 10:38 | |
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 10:45 | |
openstackgerrit | Roman Dobosz proposed openstack/ceilometer: Versioned object initial patch https://review.openstack.org/178675 | 10:49 |
*** ddieterly has quit IRC | 10:50 | |
openstackgerrit | Divya K Konoor proposed openstack/ceilometer: Events RBAC needs scoped token https://review.openstack.org/212557 | 10:51 |
*** mstyne has quit IRC | 10:51 | |
*** sudorandom has quit IRC | 10:56 | |
*** dikonoo has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 10:56 | |
*** dikonoor has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 10:56 | |
*** dikonoo has quit IRC | 10:56 | |
*** mstyne has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 10:56 | |
*** jroll has quit IRC | 10:56 | |
_gryf | hi. | 10:57 |
_gryf | any aodh developer around? | 10:57 |
*** rex_lee has quit IRC | 10:57 | |
*** deepthi has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 11:01 | |
*** sudorandom has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 11:01 | |
*** jroll has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 11:02 | |
*** rex_lee has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 11:04 | |
*** nadya has quit IRC | 11:13 | |
*** jaosorior has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 11:19 | |
openstackgerrit | liusheng proposed openstack/python-ceilometerclient: WIP: Don't try to get aodh endpoint if auth_url didn't provided https://review.openstack.org/216199 | 11:24 |
dikonoor | sileht: hi. I am trying to run the ceilometer functional test namely test | 11:25 |
dikonoor | test_event_scenarios and it doesn't seem to be running based on the instructions at http://docs.openstack.org/developer/ceilometer/contributing/source.html?cm_mc_uid=17736872156414383221153&cm_mc_sid_50200000=1440415060#running-the-tests | 11:26 |
dikonoor | sileht: I generally run sudo tox -e py27 | 11:26 |
dikonoor | or sudo tox -e py27 ceilometer/tests/functional/api/v2/test_event_scenario | 11:26 |
dikonoor | and I don't think the tests are actually getting run . IT always passes | 11:28 |
dikonoor | (py27)ubuntu@ubuntu-VirtualBox:~/openstack-src/projects/ceilometer$ sudo tox -e py27 ceilometer/tests/functional/api/v2/test_event_scenario | 11:28 |
dikonoor | py27 develop-inst-noop: /home/ubuntu/openstack-src/projects/ceilometer | 11:28 |
dikonoor | py27 runtests: PYTHONHASHSEED='262418146' | 11:28 |
dikonoor | py27 runtests: commands[0] | python setup.py testr --slowest --testr-args=ceilometer/tests/functional/api/v2/test_event_scenario | 11:28 |
dikonoor | running testr | 11:28 |
dikonoor | running=OS_STDOUT_CAPTURE=${OS_STDOUT_CAPTURE:-1} \ | 11:28 |
dikonoor | OS_STDERR_CAPTURE=${OS_STDERR_CAPTURE:-1} \ | 11:28 |
dikonoor | OS_TEST_TIMEOUT=${OS_TEST_TIMEOUT:-600} \ | 11:28 |
dikonoor | ${PYTHON:-python} -m subunit.run discover ${OS_TEST_PATH:-./ceilometer/tests} -t . --list | 11:28 |
dikonoor | PASSED (id=17) | 11:28 |
dikonoor | Slowest Tests | 11:28 |
dikonoor | sileht : Does this run those functional tests? | 11:29 |
dikonoor | ildikov: not sureif sileht is actually around or sleeping in a different time zone | 11:31 |
ityaptin | dikonoor: Hi! For testing functional tests you should run tox -e functional and write a path to tests in python format. In your case: tox -e functional ceilometer.tests.functional.api.v2.test_event_scenario | 11:31 |
dikonoor | ityaptin : Hi ityaptin..Thanks..LEt me try that.. I didn't find any documentation for that anywhere | 11:32 |
dikonoor | ityaptin: Do you know how I can run debug on functional testcases..Would tox -e debug work (I tried that and it didn't) | 11:34 |
*** thorst has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 11:36 | |
ityaptin | dikonoor: Hmm, I missed it :( I think it's bug. I'll register it and fix asap. | 11:39 |
dikonoor | ityaptin : you mean missed the documentation ? | 11:40 |
dikonoor | ityaptin: how about running debugger on functional tests..Does that work ? | 11:40 |
ityaptin | missed the run debug tox for functional tests | 11:41 |
ityaptin | dikonoor: And I'll clean the documentation lack. | 11:42 |
dikonoor | ityaptin : Do you want me to open a bug and assign it to you so that we don;t forget? | 11:43 |
dikonoor | ityaptin : you might be able to help me with debugging this >> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/211494/ | 11:43 |
*** gordc has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 11:43 | |
dikonoor | ityaptin: gordc : Hi . I am trying to understand why https://review.openstack.org/#/c/211494/ failed. As the functional tests don't have a debug working , I am hitting a wall here | 11:45 |
ityaptin | dikonoor: It will be good if you open a bug and assign to me and share the link. If you don't want I could make it. | 11:45 |
dikonoor | ityaptin : will do that.. | 11:46 |
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 11:46 | |
dikonoor | ityaptin: tox -e functional ceilometer.tests.functional.api.v2.test_event_scenario did not run for me :( | 11:47 |
dikonoor | The test run didn't actually run any tests | 11:48 |
dikonoor | ERROR: InvocationError: '/bin/bash -x /home/ubuntu/openstack-src/projects/ceilometer/run-functional-tests.sh ceilometer/tests/functional/api/v2/test_event_scenario' | 11:48 |
liusheng | maybe you can have a try with testr to debug https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Testr | 11:49 |
liusheng | just guess ;) | 11:49 |
dikonoor | ityaptin: sorry, that has a spelling mistake.. | 11:49 |
*** ddieterly has quit IRC | 11:50 | |
dikonoor | liusheng: I did try the instructions at https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Testr#Debugging_.28pdb.29_Tests and that didn't work..Has anyone tried this before for functional tests | 11:51 |
dikonoor | ityaptin: the right spelling also doesn't work :-| | 11:52 |
dikonoor | The test run didn't actually run any tests | 11:52 |
dikonoor | ERROR: InvocationError: '/bin/bash -x /home/ubuntu/openstack-src/projects/ceilometer/run-functional-tests.sh ceilometer/tests/functional/api/v2/test_event_scenarios.py' | 11:52 |
dikonoor | gordc: hello gordc. could you take a look at the changes here https://review.openstack.org/#/c/211494/10/ceilometer/tests/functional/api/v2/test_event_scenarios.py | 11:53 |
ityaptin | dikonoor: about "tox -e functional ceilometer.tests.functional.api.v2.test_event_scenario" could you share all output? | 11:54 |
gordc | dikonoor: you can run debug by tox -edebug -- <test> | 11:54 |
gordc | dikonoor: or tox -debug-mysql -- <test> | 11:54 |
gordc | where <test> is the test name | 11:54 |
gordc | it works. i usually do that and put 'import pdb;pdb.set_trace()' in code so i can step through and see all the variables | 11:55 |
dikonoor | gordc: it works for functional tests as well ? ityaptin was just mentioning that it might not | 11:57 |
dikonoor | gordc: just tried for test_event_scenarios | 11:57 |
gordc | dikonoor: it works :) | 11:57 |
gordc | or your environment is broken. | 11:57 |
gordc | or mine is broken (but in a good way) | 11:57 |
dikonoor | gordc: I get this: | 11:57 |
dikonoor | Tests running... | 11:57 |
dikonoor | Ran 0 tests in 0.010s | 11:57 |
dikonoor | OK | 11:57 |
dikonoor | + clean_exit /tmp/CEILO-MONGODB-ZNcIf | 11:57 |
dikonoor | + local error_code=0 | 11:57 |
dikonoor | + test -n '' | 11:58 |
dikonoor | + rm -rf /tmp/CEILO-MONGODB-ZNcIf | 11:58 |
dikonoor | ++ jobs -p | 11:58 |
dikonoor | + kill 10448 10496 10497 | 11:58 |
dikonoor | + return 0 | 11:58 |
gordc | what's the full command you're running? | 11:58 |
dikonoor | ________________________________________________________________________________ summary _________________________________________________________________________________ | 11:58 |
dikonoor | debug: commands succeeded | 11:58 |
dikonoor | congratulations :) | 11:58 |
dikonoor | sudo tox -edebug ceilometer/tests/functional/api/v2/test_event_scenarios.py | 11:58 |
gordc | it should be 'tox -edebug -- test_event_scenarios' | 11:59 |
gordc | or tox -edebug -- ceilometer.tests.functional.api.v2.test_event_scenarios | 11:59 |
dikonoor | gordc: ok..let me try that | 11:59 |
gordc | or replace 'debug' with 'debug-mysql' if you don't want to run mongo | 11:59 |
*** pradk has quit IRC | 12:01 | |
dikonoor | gordc: tox -edebug -- ceilometer.tests.functional.api.v2.test_event_scenarios did not work. Gave me same result as before | 12:01 |
dikonoor | gordc: trying with debug-mysql | 12:01 |
openstackgerrit | Mehdi Abaakouk (sileht) proposed openstack/ceilometer: WIP: Remove xfail tests fixed in wsme https://review.openstack.org/208467 | 12:02 |
*** deepthi has quit IRC | 12:02 | |
dikonoor | gordc: while I try that, I need some inputs on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/211509/ from you. Please see the last comment from edmondsw | 12:03 |
dikonoor | gordc: Talks about making user_id and project_id default traits | 12:03 |
*** liusheng has quit IRC | 12:04 | |
dikonoor | gordc: https://github.com/openstack/ceilometer/blob/master/ceilometer/event/converter.py#L152 | 12:04 |
*** liusheng has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 12:05 | |
*** shardy_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 12:05 | |
openstackgerrit | Pradeep Kilambi proposed openstack/ceilometer: Move profiler meters to yaml https://review.openstack.org/213832 | 12:05 |
dikonoor | gordc: Do you see any problems with something like this: | 12:05 |
dikonoor | DEFAULT_TRAITS = dict( | 12:05 |
dikonoor | service=dict(type='text', fields='publisher_id'), | 12:05 |
dikonoor | request_id=dict(type='text', fields='_context_request_id'), | 12:05 |
dikonoor | project_id=dict(type='text', fields=['payload.tenant_id', | 12:05 |
dikonoor | '_context_tenant']), | 12:05 |
dikonoor | user_id=dict(type='text', fields=['payload.user_id', | 12:05 |
dikonoor | '_context_user_id']), | 12:05 |
dikonoor | tenant_id=dict(type='text', fields=['payload.tenant_id', | 12:05 |
dikonoor | '_context_tenant']), | 12:05 |
dikonoor | ) | 12:05 |
dikonoor | gordc: As tenant_id is the old terminology, that would probably have to be deprecated (not sure how to do that though) | 12:06 |
gordc | dikonoor: ... i think we can discuss it. | 12:06 |
*** shardy has quit IRC | 12:06 | |
gordc | dikonoor: i personally don't have anything against that plan. | 12:07 |
gordc | dikonoor: keep in mind. code freeze is next week | 12:07 |
gordc | if you do propose this, this needs to be done asap (ie. now) | 12:07 |
ildikov | dikonoor: hi, soory, I'm on a workshop today, so I'm that responsive :( | 12:08 |
dikonoor | dikonoor: ok.. :-| Let me add those as default traits then and send that for review..these functional tests are killing me | 12:08 |
gordc | dikonoor: regarding your patches, there seems to two different WIP patches... which one is should we review? | 12:09 |
*** nadya has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 12:09 | |
dikonoor | gordc: try this first >> https://review.openstack.org/212557 | 12:09 |
ildikov | nadya: I added a few questions/comments to the etherpad | 12:10 |
dikonoor | gordc: this is no longer wip | 12:10 |
*** shardy_ has quit IRC | 12:10 | |
dikonoor | gordc: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/211494/ is pretty much done..but I haven't been able to figure out why those tests fail | 12:11 |
gordc | dikonoor: so this patch just checks to ensure there is USER/PROJECT_ID in request? | 12:11 |
dikonoor | yes | 12:11 |
*** shardy has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 12:11 | |
gordc | ok. but it still requires admin? | 12:11 |
nadya | gordc: hi Gordon! Have you seen this https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/telemetry_use-cases ? | 12:11 |
gordc | what if a operator wants (for whatever reason) to have non-auth api? | 12:12 |
dikonoor | gordc: removing admin and using rules are in patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/211494/ | 12:12 |
*** deepthi has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 12:12 | |
gordc | nadya: nope. but that's very cool | 12:13 |
gordc | nadya: i had this: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ceilometer-insight | 12:13 |
gordc | we can copy paste your stuff in there? | 12:13 |
nadya | gordc: yep, sure! | 12:13 |
gordc | i think it'd be good for our question to be maybe 5 answers and a 6th which is other? | 12:13 |
*** deepthi has quit IRC | 12:15 | |
nadya | gordc: do we have any limit about amount of options? Or you think that people may just skip the question with too many options :)? | 12:16 |
dikonoor | gordc: wouldn't a non-auth api break the existing logic of looking for an admin role ? | 12:16 |
gordc | nadya: 'skip because too many options' | 12:17 |
gordc | nadya: i'm not sure there's a limit... i know in school we learned most people can only remember up to 7 options... so maybe 7 is our absolute max | 12:18 |
gordc | dikonoor: i'm going to check code to see exactly what it looks at | 12:18 |
dikonoor | gordc: when you say non-auth api, would it just mean that someone chooses to NOT have the authtoken middleware here >> https://github.com/openstack/ceilometer/blob/master/etc/ceilometer/api_paste.ini#L8 | 12:20 |
gordc | dikonoor: yeah i guess based on the name it should be admin... but that's obviously too restrictive. | 12:20 |
gordc | dikonoor: right... let me dig up a bp | 12:20 |
*** julim has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 12:22 | |
nadya | gordc: In your question you're asking about OpenStack resources monitoring. But we have several hardware pollsters. IMHO, Ceilo is not right tool for hw monitoring but it would be good to know customer's view | 12:22 |
gordc | nadya: yeah, i think the idea is to understand what they're our data for, and we can debate whether to add more resources to those cases? | 12:24 |
gordc | dikonoor: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ceilometer/+spec/support-unauth-urls | 12:26 |
ildikov | nadya: gordc: if we want to limit the topics, then I guess it would be good to to focus on what Ceilometer can be used for today | 12:26 |
gordc | that was the bp i was thinking of. but now that i read it, i think it's not about api in general but specific calls. | 12:26 |
gordc | dikonoor: so i think it's safe to carry on with assumption that authentication is required. | 12:27 |
nadya | ildikov: gordc: so we should choose between "what is your use-case" and "what features do you want from Telemetry" | 12:28 |
gordc | ildikov: 'can be used for' can be a very big set of possibilities | 12:28 |
gordc | some that make sense, others that don't | 12:28 |
dikonoor | gordc: ok..the changes for this bp got abandoned | 12:29 |
gordc | nadya: what are the options you were thinking about for 'what features do you want'? | 12:29 |
gordc | existing features? or new features? | 12:29 |
nadya | gordc: e.g. application lvl monitoring, trending analysis; new features mostly | 12:30 |
*** edmondsw has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 12:31 | |
gordc | sileht: do we need this bumped to 0.1.7? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/214331/4/global-requirements.txt | 12:32 |
sileht | gordc, to support +/*- yes | 12:33 |
gordc | nadya: tbh, i think analysis tools should be a separate project. | 12:33 |
gordc | sileht: ok. i'll repropose. | 12:34 |
nadya | gordc: yep, I agree; maybe it's better to rephrase "collect all data to make trending analyses possible" | 12:35 |
gordc | nadya: "collect all data." -- i fixed it for you ;) | 12:36 |
ildikov | gordc: I meant that in nadya's list there are a few options that Ceilo is not good for today | 12:37 |
ildikov | I think it's better to focus on what we would like to improve further as we still don't have that many resources around to work on things | 12:38 |
nadya | ildikov: yep, this list is smth like "all possible use cases for Telemetry" | 12:38 |
gordc | ildikov: good point | 12:38 |
gordc | nadya: i would suggest we try to merge your existing list into shorter one line options and that can be a possible question | 12:39 |
gordc | another possible question is asking about gnocchi specifically but i think that's a bit too focused and will not give us information on rest of services. | 12:40 |
gordc | sileht: updated https://review.openstack.org/#/c/214331/ | 12:42 |
nadya | gordc: yep, I think that customers don't care about the way of data storage: time series or not | 12:42 |
sileht | gordc, thx | 12:42 |
nadya | gordc: I'm ok with merge. Will start working on this shortly | 12:42 |
openstackgerrit | Pradeep Kilambi proposed openstack/ceilometer: Add cpu meters to yaml https://review.openstack.org/215367 | 12:45 |
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 12:46 | |
ildikov | nadya: thanks for the work on this! | 12:47 |
openstackgerrit | Roman Dobosz proposed openstack/ceilometer: Versioned object initial patch https://review.openstack.org/178675 | 12:47 |
gordc | nadya: ^ much appreciated. | 12:47 |
*** shardy_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 12:48 | |
openstackgerrit | Roman Dobosz proposed openstack/ceilometer: Versioned object for Meter and Sample model https://review.openstack.org/190521 | 12:49 |
*** shardy has quit IRC | 12:49 | |
*** ddieterly has quit IRC | 12:51 | |
openstackgerrit | Roman Dobosz proposed openstack/aodh: Versioned object initial patch https://review.openstack.org/216243 | 12:51 |
*** shardy_ has quit IRC | 12:53 | |
*** shardy has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 12:54 | |
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 12:59 | |
*** annasort has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 13:00 | |
*** ddieterly has quit IRC | 13:07 | |
*** shardy_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 13:15 | |
*** shardy has quit IRC | 13:17 | |
*** ildikov has quit IRC | 13:18 | |
*** ildikov has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 13:20 | |
*** shardy_ has quit IRC | 13:21 | |
*** shardy has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 13:21 | |
*** jroll has quit IRC | 13:23 | |
*** links has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 13:31 | |
*** exploreshaifali has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 13:33 | |
*** prad_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 13:34 | |
*** prad_ is now known as pradk | 13:35 | |
*** jroll has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 13:37 | |
openstackgerrit | Divya K Konoor proposed openstack/ceilometer: WIP : Control Events RBAC from policy.json https://review.openstack.org/211494 | 13:39 |
*** r-mibu has quit IRC | 13:45 | |
openstackgerrit | Mehdi Abaakouk (sileht) proposed openstack/ceilometer: Use jsonpath_rw_ext for meter/event definitions https://review.openstack.org/215529 | 13:49 |
*** r-mibu has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 13:50 | |
nadya | gordc: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/telemetry_use-cases - please see the first 7 items. I've tried to include all your cases, but 'health monitoring' looks similar to 'alarming' to me. Feel free to add/remove items | 13:59 |
*** boris-42 has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 14:00 | |
openstackgerrit | Mehdi Abaakouk (sileht) proposed openstack/ceilometer: gnocchi: move to jsonpath_rw_ext https://review.openstack.org/216012 | 14:01 |
gordc | nadya: that looks like a good list. | 14:02 |
gordc | i'll build teh question from those. | 14:02 |
gordc | we got lucky that you were already working on this internally :) | 14:03 |
*** fawadkhaliq has quit IRC | 14:07 | |
*** r-mibu has left #openstack-ceilometer | 14:08 | |
*** Ala has quit IRC | 14:08 | |
*** jasonamyers has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 14:09 | |
openstackgerrit | Pradeep Kilambi proposed openstack/ceilometer: Move profiler meters to yaml https://review.openstack.org/213832 | 14:12 |
pradk | gordc, re your tests comment, i'm going to modify this commit https://review.openstack.org/#/c/210619/ to validate the filter, expressions and prefix etc | 14:18 |
pradk | gordc, rebased the profiler and cpu ones to use the extension | 14:19 |
gordc | pradk: cool cool | 14:19 |
*** ahilan has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 14:20 | |
*** alejandrito has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 14:37 | |
openstackgerrit | Pradeep Kilambi proposed openstack/ceilometer: Add validation tests for arithmetic, string and prefix expressions https://review.openstack.org/210619 | 14:40 |
*** exploreshaifali has quit IRC | 14:46 | |
*** bapalm- has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 14:46 | |
gordc | pradk: just curiuos but do we need all teh lookup changes still in this patch? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/213832/10 | 14:51 |
pradk | gordc, i think lookup sounds better than multi imo | 14:52 |
*** nadya has quit IRC | 14:53 | |
gordc | pradk: asking more since we plan on dropping it? | 14:53 |
*** liusheng has quit IRC | 14:55 | |
*** liusheng has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 14:55 | |
pradk | gordc, yea i just updated whats needed to support ext and left the rest in place | 14:56 |
pradk | gordc, we can drop it when we remove the support later? its just a rename so up to you | 14:59 |
gordc | pradk: are you still working on support? if not, i can look at it. | 14:59 |
pradk | gordc, i'm looking into updating the yaml to use $. syntax now.. i can look next | 15:00 |
gordc | kk | 15:00 |
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 15:03 | |
pradk | gordc, so we still want to convert paths to $. correct? | 15:09 |
*** jaypipes has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 15:09 | |
*** cmyster has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 15:09 | |
gordc | if it's required. | 15:10 |
pradk | the parser seems to handle the difference in most cases | 15:10 |
gordc | seems like sileht said it's smart enough to figure out paths in most in cases? | 15:10 |
pradk | yea thats what i'm seeing | 15:10 |
*** thorst has quit IRC | 15:11 | |
pradk | if we explicitly want to check the path we can pass $. | 15:11 |
pradk | for expressions etc | 15:11 |
gordc | pradk: i guess it's more consistent | 15:11 |
gordc | if we apply it everywhere. | 15:11 |
*** thorst has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 15:11 | |
pradk | yea that part i agree, i dont think we need any special logic in our code.. just update the yaml to use this syntax | 15:12 |
gordc | i think we should still search for [*] to check multi value support (rather than use lookup/multi atttr) | 15:12 |
gordc | pradk: cool cool. give it a try and see if it breaks :) | 15:12 |
*** jruano has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 15:12 | |
pradk | sure.. so you are looking at the [*] support? | 15:13 |
pradk | i'll push this change in a bit | 15:13 |
pradk | brb | 15:13 |
gordc | pradk: i could. but i haven't done anything yet | 15:13 |
*** cdent has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 15:14 | |
sileht | gordc, [*] is not the only expression to build array with jsonpath | 15:23 |
*** ildikov has quit IRC | 15:23 | |
sileht | you can use $.foobar.[1:7] or [@.foobar > 5] | 15:24 |
gordc | sileht: yeah, you're right. | 15:25 |
gordc | sileht: do you suggest we keep the 'multi' attribute to mark which attributes we expect to be array? | 15:26 |
sileht | yes | 15:26 |
gordc | sileht: kk | 15:27 |
gordc | i'm just thinking whether we need to know whether it's array or if we just need to know it's a path. | 15:27 |
sileht | I have one last thing I haven't yet done in jsonpath_rw_ext is the object mapping thing | 15:27 |
* gordc looks at cocde | 15:27 | |
gordc | code* | 15:27 |
gordc | object mapping? | 15:28 |
* sileht prepare an example | 15:28 | |
*** r-mibu has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 15:28 | |
sileht | gordc, http://paste.openstack.org/show/426172/ | 15:32 |
gordc | sileht: so it remaps attribute keys? i don't think we need that right now... although it might help with custom_metadatas | 15:35 |
sileht | gordc, it creates a new array only remapped attributes | 15:35 |
sileht | gordc, writing expression to build the sample will looks like a wierd big line | 15:36 |
openstackgerrit | Anna Sortland proposed openstack/ceilometer: require SQLAlchemy >=0.9.9 https://review.openstack.org/216304 | 15:36 |
sileht | that why I prefer multi/lookup stuffs, it's more readable for the deployer | 15:36 |
gordc | sileht: i see. | 15:37 |
*** IBerezovskiy has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 15:37 | |
gordc | yeah, we should probably document what the multi/lookup value is. | 15:37 |
*** david-ly_ is now known as david-lyle | 15:38 | |
*** mstyne has quit IRC | 15:38 | |
*** mstyne has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 15:41 | |
*** ddieterly has quit IRC | 15:42 | |
*** exploreshaifali has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 15:44 | |
openstackgerrit | Chris Dent proposed openstack/gnocchi: Rudimentary support for influxdb in devstack plugin https://review.openstack.org/215313 | 15:46 |
*** exploreshaifali has quit IRC | 15:48 | |
r-mibu | sileht, ping | 15:51 |
sileht | r-mibu, pong | 15:51 |
r-mibu | sileht, thank you for reviews on my event-alarm patches | 15:51 |
*** rbak has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 15:51 | |
r-mibu | sileht, I'd like ask you about the code placement | 15:52 |
*** alejandrito has quit IRC | 15:53 | |
r-mibu | sileht, as you pointed, new evaluator and service inherit existing base classes | 15:54 |
r-mibu | sileht, due to difference of the evaluation sequence, there are non-used method that might be not clean | 15:55 |
r-mibu | sileht, should I write complete new class with bit duplication with the existing one? | 15:55 |
sileht | r-mibu, I suggest to move common thing into a class named 'BaseEvaluator', the Evaluator and your evalutor inherit from BaseEvaluator | 15:58 |
sileht | they are no code duplication | 15:58 |
sileht | about the service class only the database connection will be duplicated, it's ok | 15:59 |
r-mibu | sileht, I agree your suggestion on service side. | 16:00 |
r-mibu | sileht, for evaluator, should I do the change in the current patch? | 16:01 |
r-mibu | sileht, I'd like to do that change after the current one merged | 16:01 |
*** fawadkhaliq has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 16:01 | |
sileht | I guess yes | 16:01 |
r-mibu | sileht, but I will remove setup.cfg entry | 16:02 |
sileht | your evaluator doesn't need any entry in setup.cfg (Or I have missed something) | 16:02 |
r-mibu | sileht, so that existing alarm service won't load new event-alarm evaluator | 16:03 |
r-mibu | sileht, yes if I follow your suggestion | 16:03 |
sileht | exactly | 16:03 |
r-mibu | ok, thanks - then, I will amend my patches | 16:04 |
*** links has quit IRC | 16:08 | |
sileht | welcome | 16:11 |
*** thumpba has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 16:12 | |
*** _cjones_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 16:19 | |
cdent | has there been any further discussion about what do with resource ids and gnocchi? | 16:21 |
sileht | cdent, that clearly a big issue ! | 16:27 |
cdent | I was just reviewing some of the jsonpath related changes, and it's creating resource ids in all kinds of interesting ways | 16:28 |
cdent | and I was reminded | 16:28 |
sileht | we two choice fixing all openstack applications to add uuid to everything | 16:28 |
sileht | or allow gnocchi to have string instead of uuid | 16:28 |
openstackgerrit | Pradeep Kilambi proposed openstack/ceilometer: Change json path's to start with $. for consistency https://review.openstack.org/216330 | 16:28 |
sileht | my heart prefer the first one, but second looks more feasable | 16:29 |
cdent | i was wondering about some kind of translation layer...not really sure what that would mean though | 16:30 |
openstackgerrit | Divya K Konoor proposed openstack/ceilometer: Events RBAC needs scoped token https://review.openstack.org/212557 | 16:30 |
sileht | cdent, a new db that store the mapping between a bad uuid to a good one ? | 16:30 |
cdent | I was thinking something more along the lines of a a truncated sha256 checksum on the resource id, made to use the same number of bits as a uuid | 16:31 |
cdent | but that was a wild hair idea, didn't really put much thought into whether it was actually workable | 16:32 |
sileht | cdent, nice workaround | 16:32 |
*** ildikov has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 16:33 | |
openstackgerrit | Ryota MIBU proposed openstack/aodh: Make event-alarm evaluator caching alarms https://review.openstack.org/215927 | 16:38 |
openstackgerrit | Ryota MIBU proposed openstack/aodh: Add evaluator for event alarm https://review.openstack.org/200972 | 16:38 |
openstackgerrit | Ryota MIBU proposed openstack/aodh: Add listener service for event alarm evaluation https://review.openstack.org/200974 | 16:38 |
openstackgerrit | Chris Dent proposed openstack/gnocchi: Rudimentary support for influxdb in devstack plugin https://review.openstack.org/215313 | 16:39 |
*** IBerezovskiy has quit IRC | 16:39 | |
cdent | sileht: you been seeing any of this kind of failure in your gnocchi test runs: http://logs.openstack.org/13/215313/5/check/gate-gnocchi-python27/b369b79/console.html#_2015-08-24_16_06_20_646 | 16:39 |
*** r-mibu has left #openstack-ceilometer | 16:40 | |
sileht | cdent, I cross it while I was testing the integration tests, but not dig into | 16:40 |
sileht | cdent, I guess that due to a oslo.db releases | 16:40 |
cdent | ah, that makes sense | 16:41 |
* cdent tries to repeat | 16:41 | |
openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/aodh: doc: Fix the devstack configuration https://review.openstack.org/215550 | 16:42 |
sileht | cdent, we need to upgrade to 2.4.1 I guess | 16:43 |
sileht | hum the tests already run 2.4.1 | 16:43 |
sileht | cdent, I have to go, but I known that 2.4.0 was having trouble about alebmic migration, perhaps 2.4.1 still have some trouble | 16:46 |
sileht | cdent, not all project to check running schema with the migration one | 16:47 |
sileht | perhaps we caughth a new bug | 16:47 |
openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/ceilometer: Fix dependency for doc build https://review.openstack.org/214972 | 16:48 |
cdent | my local tests are 2.4.0 and they pass | 16:48 |
cdent | upgrade to 2.4.1 and they break | 16:48 |
sileht | cdent, the difference is only two commit :) | 16:49 |
sileht | https://github.com/openstack/oslo.db/commit/27b730143886c3699ed0b072ea2304e47bff9c2d | 16:49 |
sileht | and | 16:49 |
sileht | https://github.com/openstack/oslo.db/commit/b843f049f39251c46f57df2b0da3fdc1ec923ef0 | 16:49 |
sileht | bbl | 16:50 |
openstackgerrit | Ilya Tyaptin proposed openstack/ceilometer: Allow to run debug tox job for functional tests https://review.openstack.org/216337 | 16:51 |
*** ankita_wagh has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 16:53 | |
openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/ceilometer: add flexible grouping key https://review.openstack.org/204140 | 16:57 |
openstackgerrit | Rohit Jaiswal proposed openstack/ceilometer: Adds support for dynamic event pipeline https://review.openstack.org/208068 | 17:08 |
cdent | sileht: apparently it is because of http://alembic.readthedocs.org/en/latest/changelog.html#change-0fbe5d57da5d0fc69adb44615b46a83f . There is an actual problem in the migrations: "yes these FKs have ondelete=RESTRICT in them, need that on both sides" | 17:08 |
openstackgerrit | Rohit Jaiswal proposed openstack/ceilometer: Adds support for dynamic event pipeline https://review.openstack.org/208068 | 17:09 |
cdent | jd__: you around? i'm ignorant about alembic | 17:19 |
gordc | cdent: this? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ceilometer/+bug/1480346 | 17:20 |
openstack | Launchpad bug 1480346 in Ceilometer "Gnocchi doesn't accept OpenStack id madness" [High,Confirmed] - Assigned to jiaxi (tjxiter) | 17:20 |
* cdent looks | 17:21 | |
cdent | gordc: yeah, that was what sileht and I were disussing above | 17:21 |
cdent | as sileht says "clearly a big issue" | 17:22 |
gordc | cdent: i was going to open a openstack thread on that. | 17:22 |
gordc | but it's going to be hard as hell. all the id fields in openstack are set to accept any arbitrary string of 255char | 17:22 |
cdent | yeah, thus my wondering about some kind of work around | 17:23 |
gordc | make resource ids a display id? | 17:24 |
gordc | s/resource/all/ | 17:24 |
*** ankita_wagh has quit IRC | 17:24 | |
cdent | that was one of the workarounds, the other was have a one way translation layer: incoming resource id that is not uuid is sha256 hashed and then transformed into number of bits in a uuid | 17:25 |
cdent | (which is crazy, but I wonder) | 17:25 |
gordc | i wonder what requires more computation, sha256 hash or string comparison. | 17:26 |
cdent | the idea on the latter wasn't to maintain a mapping | 17:26 |
cdent | just make ids | 17:26 |
cdent | that are one way computable from strings | 17:26 |
cdent | but it really is just a wild hair idea, I have no idea if it would actually work | 17:27 |
gordc | but it would happen every single record right? | 17:27 |
gordc | do it, if no ones complains, it ain't broke. | 17:27 |
cdent | every time you write a resource using the resource url | 17:27 |
cdent | s/resource/measure/ | 17:28 |
cdent | which could be made to be more rare than it currently is | 17:29 |
cdent | (by determing and then using the /v1/metric url ) | 17:29 |
gordc | i see... not sure myself. | 17:30 |
gordc | i think it's pretty important for us to figure out though. because if you look at logs, it's dropping a lot of measurments because we're not giving it valid ids | 17:31 |
cdent | oh yeah, definitely | 17:31 |
cdent | there are _many_ "bad" ids | 17:31 |
gordc | how would we go about solving it in OpenStack? tell everyone to just use uuid4()? | 17:34 |
cdent | that's the ideal outcome but it seems unlikely | 17:35 |
cdent | and people will wonder by gnocchi's being "difficult" | 17:36 |
gordc | yeah, but i think we should start fixing it globally... considering it'll take 2+ cycles | 17:37 |
gordc | but yeah, currently without a workaround in place in gnocchi, it's pretty useless in terms of using it with openstack | 17:37 |
cdent | sileht, jd__ : https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnocchi/+bug/1488190 | 17:38 |
openstack | Launchpad bug 1488190 in Gnocchi "gnocchi alembic migrations not compatible with alembic 0.8.1" [Undecided,New] | 17:38 |
* cdent does some experiments | 17:38 | |
*** yprokule has quit IRC | 17:40 | |
*** dikonoor has quit IRC | 17:40 | |
*** ankita_wagh has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 17:43 | |
*** Ephur has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 17:53 | |
openstackgerrit | Ryota MIBU proposed openstack/aodh: Make event-alarm evaluator caching alarms https://review.openstack.org/215927 | 17:53 |
openstackgerrit | Ryota MIBU proposed openstack/aodh: Add listener service for event alarm evaluation https://review.openstack.org/200974 | 17:53 |
*** Ephur has quit IRC | 17:54 | |
openstackgerrit | Pradeep Kilambi proposed openstack/ceilometer: Change json path's to start with $. for consistency https://review.openstack.org/216330 | 17:54 |
*** rjaiswal has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 17:55 | |
cdent | gordc: will have a proof of concept in a few minutes, just cleaning up some loose ends | 18:17 |
gordc | cdent: cool cool. is it a dispatcher change? | 18:18 |
cdent | no, it is a gnocchi change | 18:19 |
gordc | nice. | 18:19 |
cdent | you can't do it as a dispatcher change because then you are limited to what clients you can use | 18:19 |
*** bapalm- is now known as bapalm_ | 18:19 | |
*** ankita_w_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 18:27 | |
*** ankita_wagh has quit IRC | 18:30 | |
*** exploreshaifali has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 18:36 | |
*** fawadkhaliq has quit IRC | 18:55 | |
openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/aodh: Add evaluator for event alarm https://review.openstack.org/200972 | 18:55 |
*** ankita_wagh has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 18:59 | |
*** ankita_w_ has quit IRC | 19:03 | |
openstackgerrit | Rohit Jaiswal proposed openstack/ceilometer: Adds support for dynamic event pipeline https://review.openstack.org/208068 | 19:07 |
*** nadya has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 19:09 | |
openstackgerrit | gordon chung proposed openstack/ceilometer: support custom metadata https://review.openstack.org/215348 | 19:16 |
*** jaypipes has quit IRC | 19:18 | |
openstackgerrit | Chris Dent proposed openstack/gnocchi: WIP: Introduce a resource id translation shim https://review.openstack.org/216390 | 19:24 |
cdent | gordc: I reckon that ^ is pretty insane but might stir some ideas. | 19:24 |
cdent | gordc: another gnocchi limitation we need to think about is the way(s) in which it stores a _very_ limited (and fixed) set of metdata per resource | 19:26 |
gordc | cdent: are you suggesting it should store more? | 19:32 |
gordc | or be more flexible? | 19:32 |
gordc | or somethign else. | 19:32 |
cdent | I'm saying that people do queries on metadata in the ceilometer api | 19:33 |
cdent | those queries won't just be different in gnocchi, they'll be impossible | 19:33 |
cdent | and the question is: does it matter? | 19:35 |
gordc | considering it's a completely new api, i'd say it matters less?... | 19:36 |
gordc | we definitely can't go back to storing everything. | 19:37 |
cdent | yeah, no doubt | 19:37 |
gordc | i'm sort of in the extreme boat where i don't think we should have the metadata at all | 19:37 |
gordc | and we should somehow leverage the events data. but i really don't have a fully realised plan for that. | 19:37 |
cdent | I don't think we should have metadata either | 19:38 |
cdent | and we should just have a way to look up any resource by uuid from the service that "owns" it | 19:38 |
cdent | where by "we" I mean "client code" | 19:38 |
cdent | But I worry about some use case that we're not thinking of (because none of us are _actually_ ceilometer users) is going to get lost in the shuffle | 19:39 |
cdent | anyway, look at the patch I posted above please, and tell me it is nuts | 19:40 |
gordc | i don't think i fully understand. is the idea that you can only query on for metrics of a resource and that's the only filtering capabilities possible? | 19:40 |
cdent | here's all the info stored with a resource in gnocchi: https://github.com/openstack/gnocchi/blob/4a3f832a8cbb285d0120a90d30c370945d115be2/gnocchi/indexer/sqlalchemy_extension.py#L27 | 19:42 |
cdent | (beyond the generics, defined here: | 19:43 |
cdent | s/defined/listed/ | 19:44 |
cdent | https://github.com/openstack/gnocchi/blob/4a3f832a8cbb285d0120a90d30c370945d115be2/gnocchi/indexer/__init__.py#L43 | 19:44 |
*** Ephur has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 19:46 | |
*** ahilan has quit IRC | 19:48 | |
gordc | understood | 19:50 |
cdent | gordc: so which part is not fully understood? | 19:50 |
gordc | did you want to get rid of that? | 19:51 |
gordc | we also define attr here: https://github.com/openstack/ceilometer/blob/master/etc/ceilometer/gnocchi_resources.yaml | 19:51 |
gordc | which is somethign i don't like either (we have definitinos in two places it seems) | 19:52 |
cdent | yeah, that's just a duplication | 19:52 |
cdent | but is somewhat necessary to maintain gnocchi as an indepdendent beastie but still having a strong contract | 19:52 |
cdent | where "strong contract" means "indexed database" | 19:53 |
openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/python-ceilometerclient: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/210917 | 19:53 |
*** exploreshaifali has quit IRC | 19:53 | |
gordc | so what's the change you're thinking of? | 19:54 |
*** ahilan has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 19:55 | |
cdent | so there's two separate threads here | 19:55 |
cdent | a) me being worried about whether the lack of metadata is going to be upset people's use cases | 19:55 |
cdent | b) me agreeing with you about metadata being problematic and then going off into blue sky territory of metadata being a globally available datastore which is stored and mainted by each service (without stopping to think about how people might do queries) | 19:56 |
gordc | from what i understand, it'll be hard to add more metadata... a migration is required? | 19:57 |
gordc | ah i got it. | 19:57 |
cdent | b, cont) so I'm not thinking about something I actually want to do, just a way I wish the world was | 19:57 |
cdent | adding more metadata, as things currently stand, requires a migration | 19:57 |
gordc | yeah, i feel like that idea was floated once... if there was an easy way to search eavesdrop logs i think it's somewhere. | 19:57 |
gordc | but yeah, i'd like that world. | 19:58 |
cdent | stoopid world | 19:58 |
cdent | anyway, that sha256 stuff has made me tired so I'm going to go sit on the couch and do anything else | 19:58 |
cdent | jd seemed to like it well enough | 19:58 |
gordc | but it seems like it'd require a very coordinated api system. since data is everywhere. but i'm just talking randomly right now | 19:58 |
*** jasonamyers has quit IRC | 19:59 | |
cdent | imagine if you could a sort of map reduce across all of openstack.. | 19:59 |
gordc | map reduce is dead. | 19:59 |
cdent | conceptuallyâ„¢ | 19:59 |
gordc | is jd__ on half pto or something? | 20:00 |
cdent | don't really know | 20:00 |
cdent | but it is august | 20:00 |
cdent | and he is french | 20:00 |
gordc | lol i feel like the next sentence could get you in trouble | 20:01 |
cdent | thankfully there is no next sentence | 20:01 |
gordc | :) | 20:01 |
gordc | hr would be proud of us. | 20:02 |
EmilienM | cdent: hey !! | 20:03 |
EmilienM | cdent: what about frenchies? | 20:03 |
EmilienM | gordc: HR! | 20:03 |
cdent | :) | 20:03 |
cdent | I've been led to believe | 20:03 |
cdent | but perhaps it's wrong | 20:03 |
cdent | that in August all french urbanites pack up and leave the city | 20:04 |
EmilienM | cdent: it's 10pm now, I guess he just has a life? :) | 20:04 |
gordc | cdent: EmilienM's been on pto for 3 weeks | 20:04 |
cdent | hah, no, not talking about today | 20:04 |
EmilienM | gordc: no he worked remotely afik | 20:04 |
*** exploreshaifali has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 20:04 | |
gordc | it seems like he's travelling so i'm very surprised to see him reviewing/patching. | 20:05 |
EmilienM | http://stackalytics.com/?user_id=jdanjou | 20:05 |
EmilienM | a lot of activities | 20:05 |
EmilienM | he was not PTO I think | 20:05 |
cdent | in case it's not clear, we weren't complaining, just wondering | 20:05 |
gordc | i'm complaining that EmilienM was on pto | 20:06 |
cdent | that's another matter entirely | 20:06 |
cdent | he shouldn't be allowed any time off ever | 20:06 |
cdent | ever | 20:07 |
gordc | true. EmilienM you must work for your visa. | 20:07 |
EmilienM | lol | 20:07 |
EmilienM | I'm always PTO man | 20:07 |
EmilienM | gordc: you know I have troubles because of that? | 20:07 |
EmilienM | gordc: to get the visa, I need XX days of work | 20:07 |
EmilienM | and I took too much days this year so I'll have to ask for a second work permit lol | 20:08 |
gordc | hahah! | 20:08 |
EmilienM | canada... | 20:08 |
gordc | just lie | 20:08 |
gordc | say you worked 400 days last year | 20:08 |
EmilienM | :) | 20:08 |
* cdent must go | 20:09 | |
gordc | laters | 20:10 |
cdent | goodnight | 20:10 |
cdent | don't forget to not take PTO | 20:10 |
*** cdent has quit IRC | 20:10 | |
openstackgerrit | Frederic Guillot proposed openstack/ceilometer-specs: Generic Timeseries Support https://review.openstack.org/216407 | 20:10 |
*** exploreshaifali has quit IRC | 20:13 | |
openstackgerrit | Frederic Guillot proposed openstack/ceilometer: Add generic timeseries support https://review.openstack.org/216419 | 20:36 |
openstackgerrit | Frederic Guillot proposed openstack/ceilometer: Add generic timeseries support https://review.openstack.org/216419 | 20:38 |
*** nadya has quit IRC | 20:41 | |
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 20:47 | |
*** ddieterly has quit IRC | 20:48 | |
*** shardy has quit IRC | 20:50 | |
*** thorst has quit IRC | 21:03 | |
openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/aodh: Add listener service for event alarm evaluation https://review.openstack.org/200974 | 21:03 |
*** ankita_w_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 21:04 | |
*** ankita_wagh has quit IRC | 21:07 | |
*** liusheng has quit IRC | 21:08 | |
*** liusheng has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 21:09 | |
*** gordc has quit IRC | 21:26 | |
*** jruano has quit IRC | 21:45 | |
*** ankita_wagh has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 21:53 | |
*** ankita___ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 21:53 | |
*** ankita_w_ has quit IRC | 21:56 | |
*** ankita_wagh has quit IRC | 21:57 | |
*** pradk has quit IRC | 22:04 | |
*** ankita___ has quit IRC | 22:11 | |
*** ankita_wagh has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 22:11 | |
*** srsakhamuri has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 22:16 | |
*** srsakhamuri-2 has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 22:21 | |
*** jruano has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 22:24 | |
*** srsakhamuri2 has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 22:33 | |
*** ankita_w_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 22:33 | |
*** ankita_wagh has quit IRC | 22:36 | |
*** srsakhamuri2 is now known as srini | 22:40 | |
*** srini is now known as sinisak | 22:41 | |
*** thumpba has quit IRC | 22:42 | |
*** jaosorior has quit IRC | 22:45 | |
*** edmondsw has quit IRC | 22:57 | |
*** tongli has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 23:02 | |
*** rbak has quit IRC | 23:04 | |
*** thorst has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 23:08 | |
*** Ephur has quit IRC | 23:22 | |
*** EmilienM has quit IRC | 23:34 | |
*** EmilienM has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 23:36 | |
*** tongli has quit IRC | 23:54 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!