| *** promulo__ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 00:13 | |
| *** promulo has quit IRC | 00:17 | |
| *** ftco has quit IRC | 00:37 | |
| *** ftco has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 00:40 | |
| *** kun_huang has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 01:17 | |
| liusheng_ | hi, ildikov, pradk, sileht, around here ? | 01:23 |
|---|---|---|
| liusheng_ | could you please take a look at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/218148/7 | 01:24 |
| liusheng_ | rally peaple told me that the event.list() API request alwayls timeout in gate job, may it is because the large events amount, this change can extremly reduce the unneccessary events. | 01:27 |
| *** rjaiswal has quit IRC | 01:30 | |
| boris-42 | liusheng_: uuu | 01:40 |
| boris-42 | liusheng_: nice thinks | 01:40 |
| boris-42 | liusheng_: if you would like we can check that | 01:40 |
| *** tiny-hands has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 01:49 | |
| liusheng_ | boris-42, thanks, you mean check with rally ? | 01:50 |
| boris-42 | liusheng_: we can create depends-on patch in rally | 01:51 |
| boris-42 | liusheng_: and see the results | 01:51 |
| boris-42 | liusheng_: this patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/222242/ actually helps to fix issue* | 01:52 |
| liusheng_ | boris-42, cool, thanks, so this cross-project depends can check the issue, does this patch try to find the reason of the api timeout bug? | 01:54 |
| liusheng_ | boris-42, kun_huang has talked with me about that issue | 01:54 |
| boris-42 | liusheng_: exactly that | 01:54 |
| boris-42 | liusheng_: and it actually fixes the issue | 01:54 |
| boris-42 | liusheng_: so reverting that patch helps a lot | 01:54 |
| *** nadya has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 01:55 | |
| kun_huang | liusheng_: boris-42 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/222435/ the test is running | 01:55 |
| boris-42 | kun_huang: ^ so in about 1 hour we will know does it help or not | 01:55 |
| kun_huang | yep | 01:55 |
| liusheng_ | boris-42, maybe I was wrong | 01:55 |
| liusheng_ | boris-42, if this revert can fix that, my patch do different things with this gordon's patch :( | 01:56 |
| boris-42 | liusheng_: so that's sad | 01:57 |
| boris-42 | kun_huang: I believe we should remove from now Ceilometer stuff from Rally gates | 01:57 |
| boris-42 | kun_huang: and put revert of andreykurilin patch | 01:57 |
| boris-42 | kun_huang: and wait until things get better | 01:57 |
| kun_huang | boris-42: hehe okay | 01:58 |
| boris-42 | kun_huang: I would like to cut releese as soon as possible | 01:58 |
| boris-42 | kun_huang: and we need to merge some patches | 01:59 |
| liusheng_ | boris-42, let us wait the result, since the patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/218148/7 will reduce most events and the api timout seems like the amount of return is too large | 01:59 |
| *** nadya has quit IRC | 01:59 | |
| *** ankita_w_ has quit IRC | 02:00 | |
| *** ankita_wagh has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 02:00 | |
| boris-42 | liusheng_: ok | 02:00 |
| *** ankita_wagh has quit IRC | 02:05 | |
| *** ankita_wagh has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 02:28 | |
| *** jaypipes has quit IRC | 02:49 | |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/ceilometer: devstack: add new option to support event-alarm https://review.openstack.org/219348 | 02:50 |
| *** tiny-hands has quit IRC | 02:53 | |
| *** tiny-hands has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 03:03 | |
| *** tiny-hands has quit IRC | 03:05 | |
| *** changbl has quit IRC | 03:07 | |
| *** rohit_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 03:13 | |
| *** deepthi has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 03:21 | |
| *** ryanpetrello has quit IRC | 03:29 | |
| *** ryanpetrello has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 03:34 | |
| *** links has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 03:41 | |
| *** nadya has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 03:55 | |
| *** ankita_wagh has quit IRC | 03:56 | |
| *** ankita_wagh has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 03:57 | |
| *** nadya has quit IRC | 04:00 | |
| *** yprokule has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 04:29 | |
| *** rohit_ has quit IRC | 05:20 | |
| *** nadya has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 05:35 | |
| *** nadya has quit IRC | 05:40 | |
| *** nadya has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 05:48 | |
| *** nadya has quit IRC | 05:56 | |
| *** shardy has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 06:25 | |
| *** ildikov has quit IRC | 06:37 | |
| *** idegtiarov_ has quit IRC | 06:46 | |
| *** ankita_wagh has quit IRC | 06:59 | |
| openstackgerrit | Mehdi Abaakouk (sileht) proposed openstack/ceilometer: Remove useless base class https://review.openstack.org/222494 | 07:03 |
| openstackgerrit | Mehdi Abaakouk (sileht) proposed openstack/ceilometer: Refactor keystone handling in discovery manager https://review.openstack.org/222495 | 07:03 |
| *** eglynn has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 07:05 | |
| openstackgerrit | Mehdi Abaakouk (sileht) proposed openstack/ceilometer: Refactor keystone handling in discovery manager https://review.openstack.org/222495 | 07:13 |
| *** ankita_wagh has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 07:14 | |
| *** ankita_wagh has quit IRC | 07:15 | |
| *** ankita_wagh has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 07:15 | |
| openstackgerrit | Mehdi Abaakouk (sileht) proposed openstack/ceilometer: Refactor keystone handling in discovery manager https://review.openstack.org/222495 | 07:16 |
| openstackgerrit | Mehdi Abaakouk (sileht) proposed openstack/ceilometer: Refactor keystone handling in discovery manager https://review.openstack.org/222495 | 07:19 |
| *** ildikov has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 07:21 | |
| *** lsmola has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 07:28 | |
| *** lsmola has quit IRC | 07:29 | |
| *** eglynn has quit IRC | 07:29 | |
| openstackgerrit | Wen Zhi Yu proposed openstack/ceilometer: Remove duplicated pipeline support meter check when publish samples. Fix bug1494156. https://review.openstack.org/222504 | 07:36 |
| *** cdent has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 07:45 | |
| *** lsmola has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 07:49 | |
| *** gzhai has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 08:00 | |
| *** gzhai has quit IRC | 08:02 | |
| *** gzhai has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 08:04 | |
| *** gzhai has quit IRC | 08:05 | |
| *** prnk28 has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 08:06 | |
| *** gzhai has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 08:06 | |
| *** yassine__ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 08:07 | |
| *** ildikov has quit IRC | 08:08 | |
| *** safchain has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 08:08 | |
| *** Ala has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 08:09 | |
| prnk28 | Hi! I'm looking around for a mentor for the ceilometer project. Could anyone put me in touch with one? | 08:10 |
| *** kun_huang has left #openstack-ceilometer | 08:12 | |
| *** eglynn has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 08:15 | |
| *** ankita_wagh has quit IRC | 08:16 | |
| *** nadya has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 08:22 | |
| *** gzhai has quit IRC | 08:25 | |
| *** ildikov has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 08:27 | |
| *** prnk28 has quit IRC | 08:28 | |
| *** bmotz has quit IRC | 08:31 | |
| *** IBerezovskiy has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 08:39 | |
| *** r-mibu has quit IRC | 08:39 | |
| *** bmotz has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 08:43 | |
| *** r-mibu has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 08:45 | |
| *** cdent has quit IRC | 08:52 | |
| *** cdent has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 08:56 | |
| *** shardy_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 09:07 | |
| *** shardy has quit IRC | 09:08 | |
| *** shardy_ has quit IRC | 09:12 | |
| *** shardy has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 09:13 | |
| *** nadya_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 09:20 | |
| *** nadya has quit IRC | 09:20 | |
| openstackgerrit | Wen Zhi Yu proposed openstack/ceilometer: Remove duplicated pipeline support meter check https://review.openstack.org/222504 | 09:30 |
| openstackgerrit | Mehdi Abaakouk (sileht) proposed openstack/ceilometer: Remove useless base class https://review.openstack.org/222494 | 09:46 |
| openstackgerrit | Mehdi Abaakouk (sileht) proposed openstack/ceilometer: Refactor keystone handling in discovery manager https://review.openstack.org/222495 | 09:46 |
| *** prnk28 has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 10:06 | |
| openstackgerrit | Mehdi Abaakouk (sileht) proposed openstack/ceilometer: Refactor keystone handling in discovery manager https://review.openstack.org/222495 | 10:09 |
| *** f13o has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 10:22 | |
| *** idegtiarov has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 10:47 | |
| cdent | jd__: did you mean to say "has no support for resource ID that are not UUID" or maybe "now" instead? | 10:50 |
| jd__ | now I guess | 11:05 |
| jd__ | cdent: corrected myself, thanks | 11:06 |
| *** gordc has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 11:42 | |
| *** thorst has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 11:43 | |
| *** ildikov has quit IRC | 12:01 | |
| *** tiny-hands has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 12:02 | |
| *** ankita_wagh has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 12:13 | |
| *** deepthi has quit IRC | 12:14 | |
| *** ildikov has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 12:17 | |
| *** ankita_wagh has quit IRC | 12:17 | |
| *** edmondsw has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 12:31 | |
| *** ildikov has quit IRC | 12:36 | |
| *** changbl has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 12:52 | |
| *** ildikov has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 12:52 | |
| *** nadya_ has quit IRC | 12:52 | |
| *** nadya has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 12:57 | |
| *** lintonv has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 12:58 | |
| lintonv | Does ceilometer publish events using rabbitmq? | 12:59 |
| lintonv | I see multiple events in the output of 'ceilometer event-list' | 12:59 |
| lintonv | but when I try to connect to rabbitmq using yagi or stacktack, I don't see those events | 13:00 |
| gordc | lintonv: ceilometer publishes events to queue (whatever you have configured in oslo.messaging) | 13:03 |
| gordc | but by default, the collector is grabbing those events and storing it | 13:04 |
| lintonv | oslo.messaging - is that in the ceilometer conf file? | 13:05 |
| gordc | if you want another consumer of ceilometer events, you can either: publish to a different topic, change collector to listen to another topic, or just disable collector | 13:05 |
| lintonv | Thank you. How can I publish to a different topic? Is that in the ceilometer conf file? | 13:06 |
| gordc | lintonv: are you using Juno, Kilo, or master? | 13:07 |
| lintonv | kilo | 13:07 |
| gordc | you'll need to modify event_pipeline.yaml (usually /etc/ceilometer/event_pipeline.yaml) | 13:08 |
| gordc | you'll notice a publishers attribute... you shoudl change that to 'notifier://?topic=<topic name>' | 13:09 |
| lintonv | ok. Thank you gordc. I will try that. | 13:09 |
| lintonv | --- sources: - name: event_source events: - "*" sinks: - event_sink sinks: - name: event_sink transformers: triggers: publishers: - direct:// | 13:09 |
| lintonv | this is all i have in there now | 13:09 |
| gordc | lintonv: np. just a heads up, if you do this, ceilometer event-list won't work as it won't be stored/collected by ceilometer collector | 13:10 |
| gordc | lintonv: right. just change direct:// to notifier://?topic=<any topic name> | 13:10 |
| lintonv | and the topic name is? | 13:10 |
| gordc | i'm not sure how stacktach works exactly but you would need to listen to that queue | 13:10 |
| lintonv | got it. Thanks again! | 13:11 |
| gordc | lintonv: what are you trying to acheive anyways? the events logic in ceilometer overlaps stacktach already as it was originally implemented by stacktach team | 13:11 |
| *** f13o has quit IRC | 13:12 | |
| lintonv | I am trying to get notifications like instance-create, instance-delete from outside of openstack. | 13:12 |
| *** nadya has quit IRC | 13:12 | |
| gordc | if you want stacktach as it is, im not sure you need ceilometer. | 13:13 |
| lintonv | stacktack seems to look at the queue and notify via a web interface or api or via email, when an event occurs | 13:13 |
| gordc | lintonv: i see. you can technically do that with alarms and events in aodh/ceilometer but you'll need to be using Aodh event alarm service. | 13:14 |
| gordc | not the email part. | 13:14 |
| *** logan2 has quit IRC | 13:15 | |
| lintonv | Ok. I am not tied to anything. If ceilometer does the job, that would be great. I just want a reliable way to be notified when network change and instance changes occur | 13:15 |
| *** jaypipes has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 13:16 | |
| lintonv | @gordc - is aodh/ceilometer different? as in a different repo from the native openstack? | 13:18 |
| gordc | lintonv: well it's very new functionality in Aodh (the alarming compoenent of openstack)... the basic idea is that you create a rule to match an event_type and when detected, it should emit a http request. | 13:20 |
| lintonv | Ok, so it's not in kilo. But is being worked on? | 13:20 |
| gordc | lintonv: right. so we recently moved teh existing alarming functionality from Ceilometer to it's own repo: Aodh...it basically contains the same functionality but also supports the ability to alarm on events now as well. | 13:21 |
| *** jaypipes is now known as leakypipes | 13:22 | |
| gordc | since it is it's own service now, i'd imagine Aodh could be used against Kilo as well. | 13:22 |
| openstackgerrit | Julien Danjou proposed openstack/gnocchi: doc: remove details option https://review.openstack.org/222599 | 13:22 |
| lintonv | That is excellent. So, it does not have to live in the openstack cluster that is emitting the events? it can live outside? | 13:23 |
| gordc | lintonv: that said, if you have an existing stacktach service configured, you might want to just continue using that. | 13:23 |
| lintonv | ok. This is great information. I have a few things to investigate. | 13:27 |
| lintonv | @gordc. I will let you know how the results look | 13:28 |
| gordc | lintonv: cool cool | 13:29 |
| *** jroll is now known as jtroll | 13:33 | |
| *** jtroll is now known as Guest13730 | 13:34 | |
| *** Guest13730 is now known as jroll | 13:34 | |
| *** links has quit IRC | 13:38 | |
| *** logan2 has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 13:43 | |
| *** ddieterly has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 13:51 | |
| *** ddieterly has quit IRC | 13:52 | |
| *** ddieterly has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 13:52 | |
| cdent | biab | 13:55 |
| *** cdent has quit IRC | 13:55 | |
| *** ddieterly has quit IRC | 13:57 | |
| *** ddieterly has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 14:01 | |
| *** ddieterl_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 14:08 | |
| *** ddieterl_ has quit IRC | 14:09 | |
| *** ddieterly has quit IRC | 14:11 | |
| openstackgerrit | Julien Danjou proposed openstack/ceilometer: doc: update devstack usage https://review.openstack.org/221230 | 14:13 |
| *** ildikov has quit IRC | 14:22 | |
| *** yprokule has quit IRC | 14:24 | |
| *** nadya has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 14:27 | |
| *** tongli has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 14:35 | |
| *** liusheng_ has quit IRC | 14:40 | |
| *** cdent has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 14:41 | |
| cdent | gordc: make the unicorns stop | 14:47 |
| *** r-daneel has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 14:52 | |
| *** gordc has quit IRC | 14:53 | |
| *** gordc has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 15:12 | |
| gordc | cdent: what i'd miss? they're doing some network stuff right now so i pretty much dropped right when you messaged. | 15:14 |
| cdent | nothing, there's just all these dragons and unicorns for the past 24 hours and they won't stop | 15:14 |
| gordc | cdent: in a dark environment or among rainbows? | 15:17 |
| gordc | cdent: vastly different experiences. | 15:17 |
| cdent | it keeps changing | 15:18 |
| gordc | that's a bad trip | 15:18 |
| gordc | i did notice that they discovered the mess that is juno ceilometerclient versioning | 15:18 |
| cdent | yeah | 15:19 |
| openstackgerrit | Julien Danjou proposed openstack/ceilometer: doc: update devstack usage https://review.openstack.org/221230 | 15:29 |
| openstackgerrit | gordon chung proposed openstack/ceilometer: update architecture documentation https://review.openstack.org/222674 | 15:30 |
| *** prnk28 has quit IRC | 15:32 | |
| *** AlexeyElagin has quit IRC | 15:33 | |
| *** AlexeyElagin has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 15:35 | |
| *** Ala has quit IRC | 15:46 | |
| gordc | pradk: does the fact that we removed the ceilometer-central/compute-agent logic affect packaging? | 15:51 |
| pradk | gordc, ceilo packaging? | 15:51 |
| gordc | pradk: right. | 15:51 |
| gordc | to start services you need to define namespace and what not... i don't know if that's relevant from packaging pov. | 15:52 |
| pradk | gordc, if its just python code then it shouldnt, but it involves removing service scripts/config files then yes | 15:52 |
| pradk | i think we already have the namespace thingy handled in kilo i thought when starting the polling agent | 15:53 |
| gordc | ah, good to know. | 15:53 |
| gordc | was going to ask if it helps to release an rc1 with the central/compute agent removed to help with packaging. | 15:54 |
| gordc | if you aren't using it already then we all good. | 15:54 |
| pradk | gordc, so did we remove /usr/bin/ceilometer-agent-central and compute? or its still there? | 15:55 |
| gordc | it should be effectively gone as of https://review.openstack.org/#/c/212498/ | 15:56 |
| pradk | gordc, ok the polling agent pkging has support for namespaces already. | 15:58 |
| gordc | cool cool | 15:59 |
| pradk | but we still carry around the central/comput agent service files.. those will need to be removed | 15:59 |
| *** ankita_wagh has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 16:03 | |
| cdent | pradk: I was talking to someone in the rdo channel yesterday and I think they were interested in maintaining different service files | 16:03 |
| *** safchain has quit IRC | 16:03 | |
| cdent | he (number80 maybe) was going to change the running command but not the service name | 16:04 |
| pradk | cdent, we already have separate service files .. you mean keep the service files and let each using polling service with the corresponding name space | 16:05 |
| cdent | I think that's what he was saying. I don't have a strong opinion, however keeping the service names the same makes upgrades (for people who have scripts and what not) easier | 16:06 |
| *** devlaps has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 16:06 | |
| gordc | yeah... i was asking that as well. because of openstack-manual | 16:06 |
| gordc | although i might just make change anyways and note that you can still use old way | 16:07 |
| pradk | yea makes sense from upgrade standpoint, so long as the docs say the same | 16:07 |
| *** rohit_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 16:07 | |
| pradk | gordc, that would be better, just note the old names are just aliases | 16:08 |
| gordc | pradk: kk | 16:09 |
| gordc | still downloading openstack-manuals repo... blazing 65kb/s | 16:09 |
| cdent | Hang on, I'm confused | 16:09 |
| cdent | are we talking about commands or service names? | 16:09 |
| cdent | (or both?) | 16:10 |
| pradk | both | 16:10 |
| rohit_ | mriedem: Please review and approve https://review.openstack.org/#/c/217415/ when you get a chance, thanks | 16:10 |
| gordc | cdent: i'm talking about this: http://docs.openstack.org/kilo/install-guide/install/yum/content/metering-service.html | 16:10 |
| gordc | what's the diff between command and service names? | 16:11 |
| pradk | cdent, central-agent service command is an alias to polling-agent --namespace central | 16:11 |
| pradk | so systemctl start central-agent will kick off the above command | 16:11 |
| pradk | its a service script from packaging pov | 16:12 |
| cdent | right, but that's different from what gordc appears to be talking about | 16:12 |
| cdent | thus my question | 16:12 |
| gordc | cdent: i was asking whether it breaks packaging that we removed central/compute agent entrypoints... which apparently they don't use anyways. | 16:14 |
| gordc | cdent: regarding service names, from what i understand we'll keep all three, ceilometer-polling, ceilometer-central, and ceilometer-compute (the latter two for backward compat) | 16:15 |
| pradk | entry point wont hurt packaging, but service scripts do which use /usr/bin/ceilo-central-agent command5 and i'm suggesting we just change that to use polling-agent --namespace | 16:16 |
| pradk | yea and keep the service names as is | 16:16 |
| openstackgerrit | Rohit Jaiswal proposed openstack/ceilometer: Fix for AttributeError in discovery when keystone unavailable https://review.openstack.org/221546 | 16:25 |
| cdent | gordc: while you're around, have you heard anything more on that rally failure? | 16:26 |
| gordc | cdent: nope... i've no idea what event they are querying on. | 16:26 |
| gordc | i'm fairly confident it's because of restriction rather than performance but i'm going to test that out today | 16:27 |
| *** ankita_wagh has quit IRC | 16:30 | |
| *** ankita_wagh has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 16:31 | |
| *** bmotz has quit IRC | 16:33 | |
| gordc | zigo: i noticed there's no ceilometer-polling package in debian. just to let you know, the central-agent and compute-agent commands are removed in liberty ^^ | 16:41 |
| *** IBerezovskiy has quit IRC | 16:41 | |
| zigo | gordc: There's a ceilometer-polling package. | 16:42 |
| zigo | gordc: Ok, so I should remove the ceilometer-agent-compute and ceilometer-agent-central packages ? | 16:42 |
| *** lsmola has quit IRC | 16:42 | |
| gordc | zigo: oh? i'm probably using the search wrong then. | 16:43 |
| gordc | good to know | 16:43 |
| gordc | zigo: speaking with pradk and cdent it's probably best to keep central/compute packages just for backward compatibility | 16:43 |
| gordc | but they'll need to be changed to point to ceilometer-polling --namespace central | 16:44 |
| zigo | gordc: Did you just kept a /usr/bin/ceilometer-polling that replaces the agents? | 16:45 |
| gordc | zigo: yeah, basically a year ago we merge the agents into one... but we kept the original entrypoints around to maintain compability | 16:46 |
| gordc | we removed taht here:https://review.openstack.org/#/c/212498/ | 16:47 |
| zigo | gordc: What's the point? Multiple entry point is ... hum ... comfortable ! | 16:47 |
| zigo | Thanks for letting me know anyway. | 16:47 |
| gordc | simiplification. :) | 16:47 |
| gordc | zigo: is this the right place to search for packges? https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=ceilometer&searchon=names&suite=stable§ion=all | 16:48 |
| zigo | Yes. | 16:48 |
| zigo | Just this is enough: https://packages.debian.org/ceilometer | 16:48 |
| zigo | :) | 16:48 |
| gordc | zigo: ah ok, got it. original search was filtering too much | 16:49 |
| gordc | zigo: good to know | 16:49 |
| cdent | bbl | 16:49 |
| *** jasonamyers has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 16:53 | |
| zigo | gordc: So, I have to do "ceilometer-polling --namespace central" for the central agent, and what for the compute agent? | 16:53 |
| *** jasonamyers has quit IRC | 16:53 | |
| gordc | ceilometer-polling --polling-namespaces compute | 16:55 |
| gordc | sorry wrong option name | 16:55 |
| gordc | and ceilometer-polilng --polling-namespaces ipmi for agent-ipmi | 16:56 |
| *** changbl has quit IRC | 16:58 | |
| *** ankita_wagh has quit IRC | 17:03 | |
| *** exploreshaifali has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 17:05 | |
| *** ankita_wagh has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 17:10 | |
| *** ankita_wagh has quit IRC | 17:11 | |
| *** ankita_wagh has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 17:11 | |
| rohit_ | looking for reviews for https://review.openstack.org/#/c/208068/ | 17:12 |
| *** ankita_wagh has quit IRC | 17:20 | |
| *** leakypipes has quit IRC | 17:28 | |
| *** ankita_wagh has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 17:32 | |
| *** ankita_wagh has quit IRC | 17:32 | |
| *** ankita_wagh has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 17:33 | |
| *** cdent has quit IRC | 17:39 | |
| *** changbl has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 17:40 | |
| lintonv | gordc: | 17:44 |
| lintonv | gordc: I still see no events through stacktack's webui | 17:45 |
| lintonv | should the event_pipeline file have notifier:?topic=<rabbitmq queue> | 17:45 |
| lintonv | that should push the events to rabbitmq? | 17:46 |
| *** ankita_w_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 17:47 | |
| *** ankita_wagh has quit IRC | 17:51 | |
| *** ankita_w_ has quit IRC | 18:00 | |
| *** ankita_wagh has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 18:00 | |
| *** thumpba has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 18:08 | |
| gordc | lintonv: i'm not sure what queue stacktach is configured to consume from... if you're going to stacktach route, i'd probably suggest turning all of ceilometer off. | 18:18 |
| gordc | sorry i don't have much information on the latest stacktach. after they stopped integration efforts, a lot of the development went internal for a bit. | 18:19 |
| lintonv | so the events get pushed to rabbitmq, even without ceilometer | 18:19 |
| lintonv | ? | 18:19 |
| gordc | lintonv: right. nova and the other services will emit notifications. ceilometer(or stacktach) will consume them and convert them into normalised events. | 18:19 |
| gordc | the stacktach information is based on how it functioned a year ago. they might have changed their model (i'm not entirely sure) | 18:20 |
| lintonv | I see. Can aodh and ceilometer work together? Are they supposed to? I think they are one and maybe I should use aodh | 18:21 |
| gordc | yeah, they are designed to work together. | 18:22 |
| gordc | right now Aodh is only designed to notify by http request... but it's relatively simple to build other notification mechanism... you'd need to create a spec/bug for that those... or let me know what you're requirements are and we can look at adding support in. | 18:23 |
| lintonv | Ok. I will pull down aodh and configure to listen to the rabbitmq queue. I am going to install aodh outside of an openstack cluster. I will leave ceilometer as it is on the cluster. Does that make sense? | 18:24 |
| gordc | the only real requirements are that the aodh-listener service needs to have access to same message queue as ceilometer... of course you'll need to register aodh service and such. | 18:26 |
| gordc | we're still working on that documentation right now. | 18:26 |
| lintonv | ok | 18:27 |
| *** yassine__ has quit IRC | 18:30 | |
| *** lintonv_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 18:33 | |
| *** lintonv has quit IRC | 18:33 | |
| lintonv_ | gordc: I will open a bug/request with what I am trying to do here. Just saw that the community can comment or try to fix it. I will try to fix it as well, when I have narrowed down exactly what needs to be done | 18:34 |
| *** nadya has quit IRC | 18:34 | |
| gordc | lintonv_: yep, anyone can propose and fix stuff and if you're volunteering all the better :) | 18:35 |
| gordc | lintonv_: let us know if you have questions. | 18:35 |
| rohit_ | gordc: quick question on https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-ceilometerclient/+bug/1494245, do we need to fix the client? i think the apis are all fixed now except event-list which returns empty list when -q limit=1 | 18:35 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1494245 in python-ceilometerclient "--limit can collide with query string on some commands" [Medium,New] - Assigned to Rohit Jaiswal (rohit-jaiswal-3) | 18:35 |
| lintonv_ | gordc: the main challenge is understanding the system better and seeing what it can do now. I can fix after that :) | 18:36 |
| gordc | lintonv_: cool cool | 18:36 |
| gordc | rohit_: i'm actually not sure if we need a fix on client side (i haven't checked though) | 18:37 |
| gordc | rohit_: i'd think all the behaviour is dictated by the api. | 18:37 |
| gordc | rohit_: does it return empty list because it's querying for limit trait or because it doesn't know what to do with limit param? | 18:38 |
| *** dyasny has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 18:41 | |
| dyasny | gordc, ping | 18:41 |
| rohit_ | gordc: not sure, let me check | 18:43 |
| gordc | dyasny: hey, whatsup? | 18:43 |
| dyasny | gordc, all good, you? How's the new place treating you? | 18:44 |
| gordc | dyasny: it's a place.lol | 18:44 |
| *** ahilan has quit IRC | 18:44 | |
| gordc | i assume montreal is all well | 18:44 |
| dyasny | gordc, :) yeah, nice and french, as always | 18:45 |
| gordc | :) | 18:45 |
| dyasny | gordc, vladik tells me part of your lasers-pew-pew thing was an ELK stack | 18:45 |
| gordc | dyasny: it's th E and K part | 18:47 |
| gordc | and a lot of lasers. | 18:47 |
| gordc | we don't use logstash | 18:47 |
| dyasny | gordc, what did you use? fluentd? | 18:47 |
| gordc | we have our own processing service... we had existing code and we don't really do anything complex so we skipped logstash | 18:49 |
| gordc | i suppose you could always use logstash to actually capture system logs or what not | 18:49 |
| rohit_ | gordc: its the former, it constructs a traitfilter with key as limit | 18:50 |
| gordc | rohit_: yeah, that's what i guessed... which means the empty list makes sense. | 18:51 |
| gordc | rohit_: i don't think we should try to assume they intended to set limit rather than query for limit trait. | 18:52 |
| dyasny | gordc, I need to gather logs, but I'm not sure I need the actual logs, and not some sort of ETL | 18:53 |
| rohit_ | gordc: oh ok, then i will leave it as-is | 18:53 |
| gordc | rohit_: sounds good | 18:53 |
| rohit_ | gordc: thanks, Btw, can you please review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/208068/ | 18:53 |
| dyasny | gordc, the task is to get operational metrics, e.g. how many VMs got started between X and Y date-time, and how many started and how many failed | 18:53 |
| dyasny | gordc, avg VM lifetime maybe... you know, typical BI stuff | 18:54 |
| *** ankita_w_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 18:54 | |
| *** ankita_wagh has quit IRC | 18:54 | |
| gordc | dyasny: oh. yeah i don't think we have support for that yet. not from statistical pov. you'd have to do the maths outside ceilometer | 18:55 |
| gordc | you might be able to calculate it via kibana (if you use elasticsearch) | 18:56 |
| gordc | i never tried though. | 18:56 |
| dyasny | gordc, so what CAN ceilometer do? I always thought it was something like ETL+DWH for openstack | 18:57 |
| gordc | it's definitely not a data warehouse. | 18:59 |
| gordc | from events pov, all we have right now is the ability to capture events that happens on the services and normalise it. from there you can query on specific attributes. | 19:00 |
| gordc | we don't support querying like you need. but again, if you using elasticsearch you can probably craft the appropriate queries in kibana | 19:01 |
| *** changbl has quit IRC | 19:03 | |
| dyasny | gordc, I see, thanks | 19:09 |
| *** exploreshaifali has quit IRC | 19:10 | |
| *** ankita_w_ has quit IRC | 19:25 | |
| *** eglynn has quit IRC | 19:30 | |
| rohit_ | gordc: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ceilometer/+bug/1484695, does it need something from oslo_messaging? | 19:39 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1484695 in Ceilometer "pollster/api publish to info queue" [Medium,Triaged] - Assigned to Rohit Jaiswal (rohit-jaiswal-3) | 19:39 |
| gordc | rohit_: nope... or not necessarily. | 19:43 |
| gordc | rohit_: you should be able to add a sample endpoint to notificatino agent similar the info endpoint it already has | 19:44 |
| rohit_ | gordc: oslo_messaging support publishing at sample level"https://github.com/openstack/oslo.messaging/blob/stable/kilo/oslo_messaging/notify/notifier.py#L272 | 19:44 |
| rohit_ | yep thats what i commented in the bug | 19:44 |
| gordc | rohit_: yeah, i believe jd's comment was more granular/flexible control | 19:45 |
| rohit_ | gordc: ok, cool | 19:45 |
| gordc | rohit_: it has a fairly high chance of overlapping with liusheng patch's https://review.openstack.org/#/c/218148/ | 19:47 |
| gordc | actually... now taht i think about it. i'm not sure what topic the polling/api publishes to | 19:48 |
| gordc | if it's the notifications.sample topic it might actually overlap with the queue taht notification agent -> collector publishes | 19:48 |
| gordc | to | 19:49 |
| rohit_ | gordc: i thought thats the metering.sample topic | 19:50 |
| rohit_ | for the collector | 19:50 |
| gordc | rohit_: ah yeah you're right | 19:50 |
| gordc | i guess we just need to make sure they don't overlap in anyway | 19:50 |
| rohit_ | ok | 19:51 |
| rohit_ | i think liushengs patch is to disable telemetry samples to be consumed as events, we will be changing the topic it gets published with so that it can still be consumed as samples by noti agent | 19:52 |
| gordc | rohit_: right. but the notification agent doesn't listen to *.sample topic when building events so it will effectively do the same thing. | 19:53 |
| gordc | so yeah, i'm pretty sure it makes his option useless... so we either need to drop his patch or you need to add support in event endpoint to listen to sample topic (if you were to code this). | 19:56 |
| rohit_ | yes, got it, so just changing the topic where telemetry.* events get published will make his patch redundant | 19:56 |
| rohit_ | yeah..:) | 19:56 |
| gordc | tbh, i'd imagine we'd be using the *.sample topic for events eventually. | 19:56 |
| gordc | ie. we can create health check events from polling. | 19:57 |
| gordc | but that's all hypothetical. | 19:57 |
| rohit_ | ok, that sounds like a good use case | 19:57 |
| rohit_ | gordc: thanks, i will keep Luisheng's patch in minid | 19:58 |
| gordc | i have a slight preference to do the topic change now and maybe delay liusheng's patch. | 19:58 |
| rohit_ | gordc: yeah, i shud have it ready by early next week | 19:59 |
| gordc | rohit_: ok. i'm going to hold off on liusheng's patch for now... we can discuss which one we want later (or both) | 19:59 |
| rohit_ | or we can use gerrit Depends-on | 19:59 |
| rohit_ | sure | 20:00 |
| gordc | yeah. i'm thinking one only but we can mark depends on later. | 20:01 |
| rohit_ | ok, sounds good | 20:02 |
| *** lintonv_ has quit IRC | 20:11 | |
| *** dyasny has quit IRC | 20:19 | |
| *** ankita_wagh has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 20:24 | |
| *** tiny-hands has quit IRC | 21:03 | |
| *** thorst has quit IRC | 21:07 | |
| *** thumpba has quit IRC | 21:07 | |
| *** pradk has quit IRC | 21:10 | |
| *** pradk has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 21:10 | |
| *** thorst has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 21:41 | |
| *** gordc has quit IRC | 21:44 | |
| *** shardy has quit IRC | 21:47 | |
| *** edmondsw has quit IRC | 22:05 | |
| *** rohit_ has quit IRC | 22:20 | |
| -openstackstatus- NOTICE: 30 minute warning, Gerrit will be offline from 23:00 to 23:30 UTC while some projects are renamed http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-September/074235.html | 22:31 | |
| -openstackstatus- NOTICE: Gerrit is offline from 23:00 to 23:30 UTC while some projects are renamed. http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-September/074235.html | 23:01 | |
| *** ChanServ changes topic to "Gerrit is offline from 23:00 to 23:30 UTC while some projects are renamed. http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-September/074235.html" | 23:01 | |
| *** rex_lee has quit IRC | 23:03 | |
| *** ondergetekende has quit IRC | 23:04 | |
| *** ondergetekende has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 23:05 | |
| *** rex_lee has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 23:09 | |
| *** tongli has quit IRC | 23:14 | |
| *** ChanServ changes topic to "OpenStack Telemetry (Ceilometer) | https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Ceilometer" | 23:38 | |
| *** openstackgerrit has quit IRC | 23:46 | |
| *** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-ceilometer | 23:46 | |
| *** ankita_wagh has quit IRC | 23:49 | |
| *** kbyrne has quit IRC | 23:58 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!