Monday, 2017-02-13

*** os-chef-bot has quit IRC03:12
*** os-chef-bot has joined #openstack-chef03:12
*** nkrinner_afk is now known as nkrinner07:12
*** jojden has joined #openstack-chef07:29
*** furlongm has quit IRC08:30
*** furlongm has joined #openstack-chef08:31
*** Damjanek has quit IRC09:26
*** Damjanek has joined #openstack-chef09:26
*** eroux has joined #openstack-chef12:30
*** eroux has quit IRC12:37
*** eroux has joined #openstack-chef12:38
*** mutin-sa has joined #openstack-chef13:24
*** mutin-s has quit IRC13:27
*** laurent\_ has joined #openstack-chef13:30
*** laurent\ has quit IRC13:32
*** jperry has joined #openstack-chef14:14
sc`i have what i think is a good start to two-node gates, but without pushing it to gerrit, i have no way of knowing if what i write is even going to work14:17
sc`frickler: would you be in a position to review such things?14:23
*** eroux has quit IRC14:43
*** eroux has joined #openstack-chef14:46
fricklersc`: maybe, but it will mostly still be try-and-error. I've discussed this with jklare earlier today, and we are not sure whether it will be worth the effort. we are assuming that going multi-node will open up a new can of worms for sure, mainly networking related which we can completely ignore for aio. doing that in parallel to dealing with OOM issues seems bad14:47
fricklersc`: the alternative would be that maybe you could consider setting up a 3rd party CI system like we did here14:48
sc`i have no such resources at my disposal :/14:48
sc`that's partly why things have dragged on for so long14:48
sc`it wasn't until talking with people and reading code did it become apparent that multinode was a thing. repo has the memory limits for the controller at 4G, so i thought that piggy could run on two nodes14:50
sc`it's only allinone that is our problem14:50
sc`just don't advocate for allinone14:51
sc`if that doesn't make sense, or sounds like a Bad Idea, do let me know14:52
fricklersc`: I don' think it makes sense to setup multi-node on infra without having good support from an infra-root, allowing for properly debugging the networking issues that will come up14:53
fricklersc`: maybe we could first give it a try in our local CI env, but you'd have to convince jklare that that would be a good idea, first14:54
fricklersc`: other option would be trying to get a different sponsor for a second 3rd party CI. we wouldn't need more than a small controller and a quota of a couple of 12G instances. we could even do with a quota of 1, if needed14:57
sc`of course. i'm doing this on my own time. i wouldn't expect anyone to assist unless it was interesting and worth the time14:57
fricklersc`: so workday isn't interested in this anymore?14:58
sc`they're still interested in their own way14:58
sc`particularly, once mitaka is eol, i'd expect someone to poke their head in14:58
fricklersc`: another idea that just comes to my mind, maybe we could try to do a some-in-one, like leave out ceilometer and heat for a start, and see how far that will work?15:04
sc`possible. i did see that puppet disables some services depending on what they're building15:04
sc`that, and tripleo, have been my inspiration for this multinode madness15:05
sc`apparently this is a problem all over15:05
sc`solving it for chef would help the remaining five openstack-chef users ;)15:06
fricklersc`: yes, and it seems to be even more severe with ocata, once we do the switch15:07
sc`one solution on the infra side would be doubling the size of single use instances, that was mentioned when i was chatting with them, but that comes with a huge cost15:08
fricklersc`: yes, I've seen that. trouble is that they only have one pool of instances. not sure whether zuulv3 would be more flexible in the future15:10
sc`yup. that's more the nuclear option. the options for us would be to help put openstack itself on a diet, or ci work15:11
sc`we could split resources across clouds like tripleo does, but that would be getting buy-in from them15:12
sc`i think tripleo is using rhcloud, so there'a completely different relationship there15:13
fricklerthe more hooks we need in order to setup testing in a special way, the less useful will it be, because it will be different from what people deploy. we are working locally on a heat stack that will mimic our real world deployment, with multiple interfaces per node, that would IMHO be a good solution for a proper CI setup15:17
sc`of course. i didn't intend on reinventing the whole of tripleo ci for chef, but leveraging the useful parts like what nodepool exposes15:21
-openstackstatus- NOTICE: We are currently investigating an issue with our AFS mirrors which is causing some projects jobs to fail. We are working to correct the issue.15:48
*** eroux has quit IRC16:41
*** jojden has quit IRC16:50
*** nkrinner is now known as nkrinner_afk17:18
-openstackstatus- NOTICE: AFS replication issue has been addressed. Mirrors are currently re-syncing and coming back online.17:18
*** jperry has quit IRC17:23
*** jperry has joined #openstack-chef17:24
*** Edi_ has joined #openstack-chef17:41
Edi_Guide Deploying Openstack with Chef?17:43
Edi_Hi Guys17:43
Edi_Guide install Openstack with Chef17:43
Edi_where to find?17:43
*** Edi_ has quit IRC18:27
*** eroux has joined #openstack-chef18:43
*** emagana has joined #openstack-chef18:54
sc`^ that is a problem :/19:14
sc`could topic link to jklare's post from mitaka. it's still relevant19:15
*** jperry has quit IRC22:55

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!