opendevreview | Tushar Trambak Gite proposed openstack/cinder master: Use self volume_type_id while backup restore. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/851351 | 11:29 |
---|---|---|
*** tosky is now known as Guest1012 | 12:14 | |
*** tosky__ is now known as tosky | 12:14 | |
*** tosky is now known as Guest1013 | 12:30 | |
*** tosky__ is now known as tosky | 12:30 | |
opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/cinder stable/yoga: rbd: Fix snapshot delete when the source volume doesn't exist https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/858463 | 12:33 |
tkajinam | whoami-rajat, ^^^ | 12:36 |
whoami-rajat | tkajinam, ack | 12:37 |
tkajinam | gouthamr, whoami-rajat could you check my reply to the suggestion about the release note ? I'm afraid it's too late to fix it (since rc1 was just released) but I want to know whether we better fix it anyway. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/824149 | 12:37 |
tkajinam | if we need the follow up commit then I'll hold that stable/yoga backport until the follow-up is merged in maser/zed | 12:38 |
whoami-rajat | tkajinam, it's a not so easy situation, the releasenote update will go into antelope (next cycle) which might be misleading so we would need to fix the releasenote directly in stable/zed | 12:40 |
whoami-rajat | rosmaita, can you take a look at the above situation? ^ | 12:40 |
tkajinam | whoami-rajat, hmm, ok | 12:42 |
tkajinam | I tend to keep the original note (without follow-up) to avoid messing up things but I'd follow suggestions here | 12:42 |
rosmaita | whoami-rajat: tkajinam: was not paying attention, what's up? | 12:46 |
whoami-rajat | rosmaita, tkajinam had a patch proposed that merged in zed release with a releasenote followup suggestion, now if we propose the followup, the releasenote will show up in antelope so i suggested a direct patch to stable/zed | 12:48 |
lajoskatona | whoami-rajat, tkajinam, rosmaita: Hi, shall I have a dumb question regarding nexenta driver and encryption? | 12:49 |
lajoskatona | whoami-rajat, tkajinam, rosmaita: by a downstream bug it seems that encrypted volume cant be created with nexenta, shall I open a bug for it or solving these issues are more feature like for cinder? | 12:50 |
rosmaita | whoami-rajat: i think that is correct, propose correction directly to stable/zed | 12:50 |
whoami-rajat | rosmaita, ack, thanks for the confirmation | 12:51 |
whoami-rajat | tkajinam, let's wait for stable/zed to cut, i think it's still not cut | 12:51 |
rosmaita | lajoskatona: sounds like a bug | 12:51 |
whoami-rajat | lajoskatona, depends, did nexenta support encryption? did it work before? | 12:52 |
whoami-rajat | if it is not supported by the driver, it is a feature | 12:53 |
whoami-rajat | if driver supports it and doesn't work, it's a bug | 12:53 |
lajoskatona | rosmaita, whoami-rajat: as I remember it supports, but I checked it before the RC rush, so have to double-check :-) | 12:54 |
lajoskatona | rosmaita, whoami-rajat: I check it with nexenta, and come back based on that, thanks for the help | 12:54 |
whoami-rajat | np | 12:55 |
rosmaita | whoami-rajat: on that Airtel issue, the current status is that you're waiting for them to do the test you asked for, is that right? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124285 | 13:21 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/cinder master: Ceph backup: Close source file https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/854274 | 15:53 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!