| opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/cinderlib master: Remove six https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinderlib/+/840568 | 00:54 |
|---|---|---|
| opendevreview | Ghanshyam proposed openstack/cinder-tempest-plugin master: Add stable/zed jobs on master gate https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder-tempest-plugin/+/861516 | 01:08 |
| opendevreview | Atsushi Kawai proposed openstack/cinder master: Hitachi and OEM: Support multi pool https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/846977 | 02:32 |
| opendevreview | Atsushi Kawai proposed openstack/cinder master: HPE: Cinder driver for HPE XP storage FC and iSCSI arrays https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/815582 | 02:59 |
| opendevreview | OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/cinder master: Imported Translations from Zanata https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/861557 | 03:49 |
| opendevreview | Andrew Bogott proposed openstack/cinder master: cinder-backup: use the same backup backend host for incremental backups https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/861566 | 04:47 |
| *** bhagyashris is now known as bhagyashris|ruck | 05:37 | |
| whoami-rajat | haleema[m], hi, the idea is to get as much coverage as possible so I think it would be good if you could include tests for all backup APIs | 05:53 |
| opendevreview | Masayuki Igawa proposed openstack/cinder master: Doc: Fix way to update default quota value for a new project https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/845069 | 06:22 |
| *** amoralej|off is now known as amoralej | 06:45 | |
| opendevreview | Tushar Trambak Gite proposed openstack/cinder master: Update IBM Storwize drivers https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/860209 | 09:42 |
| haleema[m] | <whoami-rajat> "haleema, hi, the idea is to..." <- Alright, Can you take a look at the current PR and let me know if changes are needed. Its just one test but it will be good if I move on to others once I know if I am doing it correctly. | 09:45 |
| whoami-rajat | haleema[m], sure, can you provide the link to it? | 09:59 |
| haleema[m] | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/861491 | 10:01 |
| opendevreview | Masayuki Igawa proposed openstack/cinder stable/yoga: rbd: Fix snapshot delete when the source volume doesn't exist https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/858463 | 10:21 |
| *** amoralej is now known as amoralej|lunch | 12:05 | |
| *** dviroel_ is now known as dviroel | 12:24 | |
| *** amoralej|lunch is now known as amoralej | 13:05 | |
| whoami-rajat | haleema[m], left some comments on your patch | 13:12 |
| opendevreview | Rajat Dhasmana proposed openstack/cinder master: WIP: Test Ubuntu 22.04 (Jammy) migration https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/861609 | 13:25 |
| *** dviroel is now known as dviroel|lunch | 15:34 | |
| *** dviroel|lunch is now known as dviroel | 16:27 | |
| *** amoralej is now known as amoralej|off | 16:50 | |
| whoami-rajat | rosmaita, hey, I was expecting a SLURP discussion to happen anytime but strangely it didn't happen, is it planned for the next TC meet? | 17:09 |
| opendevreview | Andrew Bogott proposed openstack/cinder master: cinder-backup: use the same backup backend host for incremental backups https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/861566 | 17:17 |
| simondodsley | Looking for a simple Yes or No answer here. Can a cinder volume type be linked to multiple volume groups? I'm trying to see if we can have a single volume type that will create a volume with both a synchronous replicated copy and an asynchronous replicated copy. | 17:43 |
| hemna | mep | 17:56 |
| hemna | simondodsley I don't see a limitation in the DB against that | 18:07 |
| simondodsley | hemna: i'm trying to get my head around what the volume type definition would be for that. How can a single volume type have both sync and async replicatrion_type set? | 18:30 |
| *** dviroel is now known as dviroel|out | 21:31 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!